Real world data on outcomes of anti-CD38 antibody treated, including triple class refractory, patients with multiple myeloma: a multi-institutional report from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) Database

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable despite the availability of novel agents. This multi-center retrospective cohort study used the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database to describe real-world outcomes of patients withanti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) refractory MM subsequently treated with standard of care (SoC) regimens. Patients with triple class refractory (TCR) disease (refractory to a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 mAb) were examined as a distinct cohort. Overall, 663 patients had disease progression on anti-CD38 mAb therapy, 466 received further treatment (346 with SoC regimens were included, 120 with investigational agents on clinical trial and were excluded). The median age at initiation of subsequent SoC therapy of 67.9 (range 39.6-89.6) years with a median of 3 prior lines (range 1-9). The median PFS and OS from the start of subsequent therapy was 4.6 (95% CI 4.1-5.6) months and 13.3 (95% CI 10.6-16.6) months, respectively. The median PFS and OS of patients with TCR disease (n = 199) was 4.4 (95% CI 3.6-5.3) months and 10.5 (95% CI 8.5-13.8) months. Our results reinforce that real-world patients with relapsed MM, particularly those with TCR disease, have dismal outcomes. There remains an urgent unmet need for the development of and access to effective therapeutics for these patients.

Consensus guidelines for the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in systemic light-chain amyloidosis

This manuscript summarizes the recommendations that emerged from the first Roundtable on Clinical Research in Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis (AL), a meeting sponsored by the Amyloidosis Foundation (Clarkston, MI, USA) to develop a consensus of experts on a modern framework for clinical trial design and drug development in AL. Recent diagnostic and technical advances in AL, and updated consensus guidelines for assessing hematologic and organ responses, enable us to define study populations, appropriate end points, and other criteria for all phases of clinical research. This manuscript provides a framework for the design and conduct of systematic collaborative clinical research in AL to encourage more rapid testing of therapies and to expedite new drug development and approval.

A retrospective study assessing the incidence, risk factors and comorbidities of pamidronate-related necrosis of the jaws in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND

Bone necrosis of the jaws is a newly recognized complication associated with the use of bisphosphonates. The true incidence of this complication is unknown and the pathophysiology is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of jaw necrosis among a homogeneous population of multiple myeloma patients receiving the bisphosphonate pamidronate, to investigate risk factors and comorbidities that increase the risk and to characterize the radiographic changes on conventional dental radiographs in terms of type and frequency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective review of medical and dental charts and databases in the medical oncology and dental departments at Princess Margaret Hospital, a tertiary cancer centre in Toronto. Two patient sample sizes were used, n = 655 for assessment of the incidence and n = 120 for analysis of the risk factors and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The incidence was estimated at 3.2% (95% confidence interval). The following risk factors were found to be statistically significant: longer duration of pamidronate therapy (P < 0.001), dental extractions (P < 0.001), cyclophosphamide therapy (P < 0.014), prednisone therapy (P < 0.014), erythropoietin therapy (P = 0.006), low hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001), renal dialysis (P < 0.016) and advanced age (P < 0.001). Radiographic changes produced by the necrotic bone were less evident than the clinically exposed bone.

Retrospective review of DPACE therapy for aggressive, refractory multiple myeloma (MM)

18500

Background: Oral dexamethasone ± thalidomide with a 4-day infusion of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (DPACE) is an effective induction therapy prior to transplant in patients (pts) with MM. Limited experience also suggests DPACE may reduce disease burden as a salvage regimen for aggressive, refractory MM. Methods: We performed a retrospective review from 1999- 2005 of all MM pts who received DPACE ± thalidomide as a salvage regimen at our center. Results: A total of 39 pts received DPACE at a median 23 mos from diagnosis (range, 10–84). Median age was 53 years (34–70), 51% stage 3 at diagnosis. Plasma cell leukemia had developed in 12 pts and leptomeningeal disease in 4 pts at time of DPACE. Ten of 24 pts (42%) with cytogenetics had del 13q. Pts were heavily pretreated (median 3 prior regimens; prior autotransplant [ASCT] 38%; thalidomide 64%; and bortezomib 10%). Pts received 1–4 cycles as tolerated for refractory (83%) or relapsed (17%) disease. Thalidomide was used in 41% of cycles. Hematologic toxicity was common (grade 3–4 neutropenia 92% and thrombocytopenia 72%). Although G-CSF was used in 71% of cycles, febrile neutropenia was common (53%) and 26% required hospitalization. Overall RR was 36% (14 pts: PR 12, VGPR 2). An additional 8% achieved MR, 23% SD. PD occurred in 15% and 18% died on therapy (4 progressive MM; 2 neutropenic sepsis, 1 GI bleed). No prior ASCT (p=0.04) and <4 prior regimens (p=0.04) predicted for response to DPACE. Eleven pts proceeded to ASCT and one pt to a clinical trial with lenalidomide with a median OS from DPACE of 24.7 mos (95% CI, 11.2–63.6). Those who did not bridge to transplant or trial (n=27) had a short median PFS of 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.2–5.5) and OS of 6.7 mos (95% CI, 1.8–9.7). OS for all 39 pts was 8.7 mos (95% CI, 6.4–12.4). Conclusion: DPACE may be effective salvage therapy for heavily pretreated MM pts. Although the RR of 36% in this poor prognosis cohort is reasonable, the PFS is short and suggests that the best role for this regimen is in bridging to more definitive therapy such as transplantation.

[Table: see text]

ZIO-101 (S-dimethylarsino-glutathione): Phase I/II trials in advanced/progressive multiple myeloma

8109

Background: ZIO-101(S-dimethylarsino-glutathione), a novel organic arsenic, is active against multiple cancers including myeloma in vitro and in animal models. In vitro, it is active at low concentrations in cancers resistant to arsenic trioxide. Anti-cancer activity is multifaceted and is mediated by disrupted mitochondrial function, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, modified signal transduction and anti-angiogenesis. Methods: (1) Phase I/II study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose- limiting toxicity (DLT), safety-profile and preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced/progressive myeloma receiving ZIO-101 daily for 5 consecutive d every 4 w; (2) comparison of this schedule at MTD with a schedule of 420 mg/me2/d twice/w for 3 w every 4 w. Results: (1) phase I/ II: 19 patients have been treated so far. Median age is 61 y (range, 41–84 y). Median N prior therapies was 8 (range, 4–10). ZIO-101 was well-tolerated; MTD was 420 mg/me2/d for the 5 d schedule, and DLT was transient confusion /ataxia. No clinically- important biochemical, bone marrow, or cardiac toxicities were seen and there was neither neuropathy nor QTc-prolongation. Pain during peripheral infusion was reported in some patients. Anemia was the only adverse event = grade-3 in 25% of subjects. 6 of 14 evaluable subjects had stable disease (SD) =8 w and 2, SD > 6 mo. Accrual to the phase II portion continues. Conclusions: ZIO-101 was well- tolerated. In the daily for 5 consecutive d every 4 w schedule, the MTD is 420 mg/me2/d and DLT, transient confusion /ataxia. There was SD in 43% of patients with advanced/progressive myeloma, of whom half are beyond 6 months. Accrual into the phase II part of this study continues.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Clinical Practice Guideline

Questions: (1) In patients with multiple myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma, what is the efficacy of bortezomib alone or in combination as measured by survival, quality of life, disease control (for example, time to progression), response duration, or response rate? (2) What is the toxicity associated with the use of bortezomib? (3) Which patients are more or less likely to benefit from treatment with bortezomib? Perspectives: Evidence was selected and reviewed by two members of the Hematology Disease Site Group and by methodologists from the Program in Evidencebased Care (pebc) at Cancer Care Ontario. The practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Hematology Disease Site Group, which comprises hematologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and a patient representative. As part of an external review process, the report was disseminated to practitioners throughout Ontario to obtain their feedback. Outcomes: Outcomes of interest were overall survival, quality of life, response rates and duration, and rates of adverse events. Methodology: A systematic search was conducted of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthStar, cinahl, and Cochrane Library databases for primary articles and practice guidelines. The resulting evidence informed the development of clinical practice recommendations. Those recommendations were appraised by a sample of practitioners in Ontario and modified in response to the feedback received. The systematic review and modified recommendations were approved by a review body w theithin pebc. Results: The literature review found one randomized controlled trial (rct)—the only published rct of bortezomib in relapsed myeloma. A number of phase ii studies were also retrieved, including a randomized phase ii study. No randomized trials were retrieved for lymphoma. The rct found bortezomib to be superior to highdose dexamethasone for median time to progression and 1-year survival in patients with relapsed myeloma, although grade 3 adverse events were more common in the bortezomib arm. Bortezomib is recommended as the preferred treatment option in patients with myeloma relapsing within 1 year of the conclusion of initial treatment; it may also be a reasonable option in patients relapsing at least 1 year after autologous stem-cell transplantation. Practice Guideline: This evidence-based series applies to adult patients with myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma of any type, stage, histology, or performance status. Recommendations: Based on the results of a large well-conducted rct, which represents the only published randomized study in relapsed myeloma, the Hematology Disease Site Group (dsg) offers the following recommendations: (1) For patients with myeloma refractory to or relapsing within 1 year of the conclusion of initial or subsequent treatment or treatments, including autologous stem-cell transplantation, and who are candidates for further chemotherapy, bortezomib is recommended as the preferred treatment option. (2) Bortezomib is also a reasonable option for patients relapsing at least 1 year after autologous stem-cell transplantation. The dsg is aware that thalidomide, alkylating agents, or repeat transplantation may also be options for these patients. However, evaluation of these other options is beyond the scope of this practice guideline. (3) For patients with myeloma relapsing at least 1 year after the conclusion of alkylating agent–based chemotherapy who are candidates for further chemotherapy, further treatment with alkylating agent–based chemotherapy is recommended. (4) Evidence is insufficient to support the use of bortezomib in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Waldenström macroglobulinemia outside of clinical trials. Qualifying Statements: Limited evidence supports the appropriateness of a specific time-to-relapse period as being indicative of treatment-insensitive disease. The 1-year threshold provided in the foregoing recommendations is based on the opinion of the Hematology dsg. For specific details related to the administration of bortezomib therapy, the dsg suggests that clinicians refer to the protocols used in major trials. Some of those details are provided here for informational purposes. Dosage: Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 is given as a rapid intravenous bolus over 3–5 seconds on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle; a minimum of 72 hours between doses is required to allow for recovery of normal proteasome function. Vital signs should be checked before and after each dose. A complete blood count is recommended before each dose, with blood chemistries (including electrolyte and creatinine levels) monitored at a minimum on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The dose of bortezomib should be reduced or held immediately upon development of painful neuropathy, as described in the product monograph; dose modification may also be required for peripheral sensory neuropathy without pain or for other toxicities. Most toxicities are reversible if dose modification guidelines are followed. Response to Treatment: Responses are usually apparent by 6 weeks (2 cycles). For patients achieving complete remission (determined by negative electrophoresis and immunofixation), bortezomib should be given for 2 additional cycles beyond the date of confirmed complete remission. In patients with progressive disease after 2 cycles or stable disease after 4 cycles, dexamethasone added to the bortezomib regimen (20 mg by mouth the day of and the day after each bortezomib dose) may produce an objective response. Bortezomib (with or without dexamethasone) should be continued in patients showing benefit from therapy (excluding those in complete remission) unless disease progression or significant toxicity is observed. Therapy should be discontinued in patients who do not respond to bortezomib alone if disease progression is seen within 2 cycles of the addition of dexamethasone. The Hematology dsg recognizes that thalidomide is an active agent in multiple myeloma patients who have relapsed after autologous stem-cell transplantation or who are refractory to alkylating agent–based chemotherapy. To date, no reported rcts have evaluated thalidomide in this role, and specifically, no trials have compared thalidomide with bortezomib. Given these limitations, the members of the Hematology dsg regard thalidomide or bortezomib as therapy alternatives to dexamethasone.

Bortezomib in multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline

QUESTIONS

In patients with multiple myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma, what is the efficacy of bortezomib alone or in combination as measured by survival, quality of life, disease control (for example, time to progression), response duration, or response rate?What is the toxicity associated with the use of bortezomib?Which patients are more or less likely to benefit from treatment with bortezomib?

PERSPECTIVES

Evidence was selected and reviewed by two members of the Hematology Disease Site Group and by methodologists from the Program in Evidence-based Care (pebc) at Cancer Care Ontario. The practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Hematology Disease Site Group, which comprises hematologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and a patient representative. As part of an external review process, the report was disseminated to practitioners throughout Ontario to obtain their feedback.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest were overall survival, quality of life, response rates and duration, and rates of adverse events.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic search was conducted of the medline, embase, HealthStar, cinahl, and Cochrane Library databases for primary articles and practice guidelines. The resulting evidence informed the development of clinical practice recommendations. Those recommendations were appraised by a sample of practitioners in Ontario and modified in response to the feedback received. The systematic review and modified recommendations were approved by a review body w theithin pebc.

RESULTS

The literature review found one randomized controlled trial (rct)-the only published rct of bortezomib in relapsed myeloma. A number of phase ii studies were also retrieved, including a randomized phase ii study. No randomized trials were retrieved for lymphoma. The rct found bortezomib to be superior to high-dose dexamethasone for median time to progression and 1-year survival in patients with relapsed myeloma, although grade 3 adverse events were more common in the bortezomib arm. Bortezomib is recommended as the preferred treatment option in patients with myeloma relapsing within 1 year of the conclusion of initial treatment; it may also be a reasonable option in patients relapsing at least 1 year after autologous stem-cell transplantation.

PRACTICE GUIDELINE

This evidence-based series applies to adult patients with myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma of any type, stage, histology, or performance status.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of a large well-conducted rct, which represents the only published randomized study in relapsed myeloma, the Hematology Disease Site Group (dsg) offers the following recommendations: For patients with myeloma refractory to or relapsing within 1 year of the conclusion of initial or subsequent treatment or treatments, including autologous stem-cell transplantation, and who are candidates for further chemotherapy, bortezomib is recommended as the preferred treatment option.Bortezomib is also a reasonable option for patients relapsing at least 1 year after autologous stem-cell transplantation. The dsg is aware that thalidomide, alkylating agents, or repeat transplantation may also be options for these patients. However, evaluation of these other options is beyond the scope of this practice guideline.For patients with myeloma relapsing at least 1 year after the conclusion of alkylating agent-based chemotherapy who are candidates for further chemotherapy, further treatment with alkylating agent-based chemotherapy is recommended.Evidence is insufficient to support the use of bortezomib in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Waldenström macroglobulinemia outside of clinical trials.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

Limited evidence supports the appropriateness of a specific time-to-relapse period as being indicative of treatment-insensitive disease. The 1-year threshold provided in the foregoing recommendations is based on the opinion of the Hematology dsg. For specific details related to the administration of bortezomib therapy, the dsg suggests that clinicians refer to the protocols used in major trials. Some of those details are provided here for informational purposes.

DOSAGE

Bortezomib 1.3,g/m(2) is given as a rapid intravenous bolus over 3-5 seconds on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle; a minimum of 72 hours between doses is required to allow for recovery of normal proteasome function. Vital signs should be checked before and after each dose. A complete blood count is recommended before each dose, with blood chemistries (including electrolyte and creatinine levels) monitored at a minimum on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The dose of bortezomib should be reduced or held immediately upon development of painful neuropathy, as described in the product monograph; dose modification may also be required for peripheral sensory neuropathy without pain or for other toxicities. Most toxicities are reversible if dose modification guidelines are followed. RESPONSE TO TREATMENT: Responses are usually apparent by 6 weeks (2 cycles). For patients achieving complete remission (determined by negative electrophoresis and immunofixation), bortezomib should be given for 2 additional cycles beyond the date of confirmed complete remission. In patients with progressive disease after 2 cycles or stable disease after 4 cycles, dexamethasone added to the bortezomib regimen (20 mg by mouth the day of and the day after each bortezomib dose) may produce an objective response. Bortezomib (with or without dexamethasone) should be continued in patients showing benefit from therapy (excluding those in complete remission) unless disease progression or significant toxicity is observed. Therapy should be discontinued in patients who do not respond to bortezomib alone if disease progression is seen within 2 cycles of the addition of dexamethasone. The Hematology dsg recognizes that thalidomide is an active agent in multiple myeloma patients who have relapsed after autologous stem-cell transplantation or who are refractory to alkylating agent-based chemotherapy. To date, no reported rcts have evaluated thalidomide in this role, and specifically, no trials have compared thalidomide with bortezomib. Given these limitations, the members of the Hematology dsg regard thalidomide or bortezomib as therapy alternatives to dexamethasone.

Genetic risk identifies multiple myeloma patients who do not benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation

Genetic aberrations have emerged as major prognostic factors for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated 126 MM patients for t(4;14) or t(11;14), 13q or p53 deletions and correlated the number of genetic aberrations with patient's clinical outcome following undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. We demonstrate the significance of genetic-based risk classification that clearly segregate patients into low (no genetic abnormalities or only t(11;14)), intermediate (any one of the genetic abnormalities other than t(11;14)) and high-risk groups (any two or more of the genetic abnormalities other than t(11;14)). High-risk patients do not benefit from stem cell transplant and should be offered alternative therapies.

Outcome of unrelated transplants in patients with multiple myeloma

The outcome of patients with multiple myeloma treated with standard therapy is disappointing, with a historical median survival of 3 years. Although high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant has improved treatment outcomes, cure is unlikely. Allogeneic transplant provides a tumor-free graft and a graft-versus-myeloma effect. However, only a minority of patients has a compatible sibling donor. Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplant is another option. We analyzed the outcome of patients who received an unrelated bone marrow transplant facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP). Between 1989 and 2000, 71 patients received a myeloablative unrelated transplant for multiple myeloma; 70 patients consented for this analysis. The median recipient age was 44 years. A total of 31% of patients had received a prior autologous transplant. In all, 91% of patients engrafted. The 3-year cumulative incidence estimate of relapse was 34+/-10%. The incidence of Grade II-IV GVHD was 47%. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall survival at 5 years was 9+/-7%. The 100-day treatment-related mortality was 42%. In multivariate analysis, only a male donor was a significant predictor for survival. Better strategies are needed to treat patients with multiple myeloma, perhaps by using less-toxic, nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in primary systemic amyloidosis: the impact of selection criteria on outcome

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) produces high hematologic and organ responses. However, treatment-related mortality remains high and reported series are subject to selection bias. In all, 48 of 80 amyloid patients referred to our center had AL in the absence of myeloma, 26 of these 48 were deemed transplant candidates and 20 actually underwent ASCT. Transplant-related mortality has fallen from 50 to 20% since January 1999 due to better patient selection and prophylactic measures. Intent-to-treat organ responses were renal (46%), cardiac (25%) and liver (50%). Organ responses in patients who survived transplantation were renal (75%), cardiac (40%) and liver (100%). The 3-year OS post-ASCT was 56% with improved outcome predicted by a better performance status (P=0.08), normal ALP (P=0.08), nephrotic syndrome (P=0.01) and the absence of severe hypotension (P=0.01). The 3-year OS for all referred patients was 44% and this was not significantly better for transplant candidates. Patients with significant hypotension (systolic blood pressure < or =90 mmHg) or poor performance status (ECOG >2) have an exceedingly high treatment-related mortality and should not be transplanted. For those undergoing ASCT, organ response rates appear promising, but conclusive evidence of improved survival for this select group of patients is still lacking and will require randomized trials.

Intermediate dose thalidomide (200 mg daily) has comparable efficacy and less toxicity than higher doses in relapsed multiple myeloma

Thalidomide at doses >200 mg has 100% grade 1-2 and 25% grade 3-4 toxicities requiring discontinuation. We report a retrospective study of relapsed myeloma patients treated with thalidomide 200 mg with no dose escalation. Thirty patients were identified; 43% of patients responded with paraprotein decline >75% -- 2 (6%), 50-75% -- 7 (23%), 25-50% -- 4 (14%) and 2 (6%) were stable. All five patients with 13q deletion responded. Only 54% reported grade 1-2 toxicities (none reporting > grade 2) with 5 (17%) discontinuing treatment due to toxicity. Thalidomide 200 mg daily with no dose escalation appears as effective and better tolerated than escalated doses for relapsed myeloma patients.

The journal of pathology publishes faster on EarlyView

Original papers accepted by The Journal of Pathology are now published online via EarlyView once proofs have been approved by authors. Readers can therefore view papers before they are compiled into a print issue. Authors can cite the EarlyView version of the paper as published online and by using the paper's DOI (digital object identifier). Papers can therefore be read and cited in a shorter time frame, enabling faster publication for authors and a faster response to published work. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A randomized phase II study of BB-10010: a variant of human macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha for patients receiving high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide for malignant lymphoma and breast cancer

Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha) is a chemokine that can inhibit the cell cycle progression of both primitive haemopoietic and epidermal progenitor cells. This property could potentially be exploited to attenuate both the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy as well as mucositis. We evaluated both the biological and clinical effects of BB-10010, a genetically engineered variant of MIP-1alpha, in patients with malignant lymphoma or breast cancer receiving high-dose etoposide (VP 3.6 g/m2) and cyclophosphamide (Cy 200 mg/kg). 52 patients were randomized to one of three cohorts. Cohort A received no BB-10010; cohorts B and C received 10 microg/kg and 100 microg/kg of BB-10010, respectively. All patients received post-chemotherapy G-CSE BB-10010 was well tolerated. There were no significant differences between groups in recovery to an ANC > 0.5 x 10(9)/l, 1 x 10(9)/l or 1.5 x 10(9)/l, the number of days with an ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/l, days to a platelet count > 50 x 10(9)/l or 100 x 10(9)/l, or the incidence and severity of mucositis. There was no evidence of any effect of BB-10010 on colony-forming cell (CFC) or long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) mobilization, cycling activity in the marrow or on chemotherapy-induced changes in CFC or LTC-IC number both of which were in the normal range by 22 d after completion of the chemotherapy. To our knowledge this is the first report of a myelointensive regimen having no apparent long-term effect on the LTC-IC compartment. In summary, BB-10010 is safe when used in patients receiving high-dose therapy but has no effect on reducing the toxicity of such therapy.

Acyclovir prophylaxis of oral herpes virus during bone marrow transplantation

Oropharyngeal shedding of herpes viruses (herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus) was assessed in patients on standard acyclovir prophylaxis during bone marrow transplantation (BMT) to determine the frequency of viral shedding and to assess possible oropharyngeal complications that may be associated with viral reactivation in these patients. We conducted a prospective assessment of 83 patients receiving BMT. Patients were evaluated weekly and oral surveillance cultures were completed. Shedding of herpes simplex virus (HSV) was detected in the oropharynx of 2.9% of seropositive patients on prophylactic acyclovir, and only one case of clinical oral herpetic infection was seen. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) was cultured from the oropharynx in 13.3% of CMV seropositive patients provided with prophylactic acyclovir, but no oropharyngeal lesions were attributed to CMV reactivation. No correlation was seen between HSV and CMV pretransplant serology and severity of oral mucositis and acute graft versus host disease. No effect on time to engraftment was detected. This study supports the continuing use of acyclovir prophylaxis in HSV seropositive patients receiving BMT. Acyclovir prophylaxis was effective in preventing viral shedding in all but 2.9% of patients, and only one case of clinical infection was diagnosed. The frequency of CMV shedding was approximately four times that of HSV; however, no oral lesions were attributed to CMV.

Prophylaxis of candidiasis in patients with leukemia and bone marrow transplants

OBJECTIVES

The increased risk for systemic fungal infection and the potential fatal consequences of disseminated candidiasis in bone marrow transplant patients has prompted study of prophylaxis and early treatment of candida colonization and infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with leukemia who received fluconazole prophylaxis were compared with a concurrent group of patients not given prophylaxis for fungal organisms.

RESULTS

A trend to reduction of oropharyngeal colonization by Candida albicans was seen (p = 0.07) although no significant differences in systemic candidiasis were seen. In patients with documented systemic candidiasis, oral colonization was present and systemic infection was identified after the development of ulcerative oral mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the potential of fluconazole to reduce oropharyngeal colonization by Candida albicans, however, we did not show prophylaxis of oral candidiasis or systemic candidiasis. These findings and reports of fluconazole-resistant candidal species and a rising number of cases of infection as a result of Candida krusei indicate the need for further studies of prophylaxis of candidal infection in patients who are anticipated to develop profound neutropenia.

Early autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease

The use of ABMT "early" in Hodgkin's disease (HD) could refer to its to its application at diagnosis, as part of primary therapy or even at the first evidence of disease progression after primary therapy. We have recommended intensive therapy and ABMT to HD patients at the time of first relapse after a complete remission induced by primary chemotherapy. Among the 58 patients entering transplant protocols at the time of first relapse, the majority first received several cycles of conventional chemotherapy and/or local radiotherapy prior to hospitalization for conditioning and autotransplantation. However, all 58 were subsequently conditioned with high-dose cyclophosphamide, BCNU and VP 16-213 +/- cisplatin (CBV +/- P) and autologous transplantation. The progression free survival (PFS) after transplantation was 61% (95% confidence intervals [C.I.] 43%-74%) at a median follow-up of 3.6 (range 1.6-8.2) years. Two patients died of toxicity within the first 5 months of ABMT, while 3 late deaths occurred > 1 year post-transplant. The probability of progression was 28% (95% C.I. 17%-43%). Multivariate analysis identified 3 adverse risk factors for PFS-B symptoms at relapse, initial remission duration < 1 year and extranodal disease at relapse. PFS was significantly correlated with the number of adverse factors. Patients with 2 or 3 risk factors are candidates for more intensive or innovative measures due to the high relapse rate seen in these subgroups. Patients with 0 or 1 risk factors have a < 15% probability of relapse post-transplant, and are arguably candidates for less aggressive regimens.

Should high risk patients with Hodgkin's disease be singled out for heavier therapeutic regimens while low risk patients are spared such therapies?

In order to optimize the use of intensive therapy and autologous transplantation in patients with progressive Hodgkin's disease, we have examined the outcome of our initial 100 patients entered into autograft studies between 1985 and 1992. At a median follow-up of 3.6 (range 1.6-8.2) years, the actuarial progression free survival (PFS) was 46% (95% confidence intervals 33%-57%). The most significant determinant of PFS was the disease status at the time of protocol entry. Patients entered into transplant studies at the time of first untested relapse had a PFS of 61% compared with 38% in those who had failed induction chemotherapy, 25% in patients treated in > or = second untested relapse and 0% in those in a chemoresistant relapse. The reasons for failure differed, however, in that a high non-relapse mortality was seen in the > or = second untested relapse and resistant relapse groups while a high probability of relapse was observed in the induction failures and resistant relapse group. The most obvious group to target with more intensive therapeutic regimens consists of patients who have failed induction chemotherapy.

Structural rearrangement of the Y chromosome in a case of acute myeloid leukemia M2

Involvement of the Y chromosome in numerical changes associated with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia is quite common, whereas acquired structural rearrangements of the Y chromosome are much rarer, there being only four such cases documented in the literature [1]. We identified a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML M2) with rearrangements of chromosomes 1, 10, and Y; at remission, all analyzed metaphases were normal, confirming the acquired nature of the Y chromosome abnormality.

Efficacy of chlorhexidine and nystatin rinses in prevention of oral complications in leukemia and bone marrow transplantation

The goal of reducing oral complications during chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation has received attention at several centers. The current randomized study of 86 adults with leukemia treated with chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation assessed the potential role of chlorhexidine, nystatin, and saline solution rinses to reduce the findings of oral mucositis, gingivitis, and oral infection. The results of this study did not show a reduction in mucositis with the use of these rinses. However, potential bacterial and fungal pathogens were identified less frequently in the patients using chlorhexidine rinse.

Outcome of treatment of first relapse of Hodgkin's disease after primary chemotherapy: identification of risk factors from the British Columbia experience 1970 to 1988

The outcome of treatment for a first relapse of Hodgkin's disease after primary chemotherapy was analyzed in 80 patients. They were divided into four groups: group 1 (n = 24) had initially been treated with three cycles of (mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone, and procarbazine [MOPP]) and wide-field irradiation therapy; group 2 (n = 25) had six cycles of MOPP; group 3 (n = 15) and group 4 (n = 16) both initially received MOPP/ABVD (MOPP plus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or MOPP/ABV hybrid, but group 3 received conventional salvage regimens whereas group 4 was treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation as salvage therapy (n = 16). Freedom from second failure (FF2F) was used as the major endpoint. Actuarial FF2F for all patients was 38% after a median follow-up of 75 months for patients who were alive. Risk factor analysis was performed on the 71 patients who had been treated with curative intent. The presence or absence of any one of three risk factors had a strong negative impact on outcome: stage IV disease at primary diagnosis, B symptoms at relapse, or a time from primary treatment to relapse of less than 1 year. Actuarial FF2F at 5 years was 17% in the group of patients with one or more of these three factors present (n = 49). If none of these factors was present, FF2F was 82% (n = 22) (P less than .001). Even high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation were not able to overcome the negative impact of one or more risk factors (FF2F = 19%, n = 12). The outcome of salvage treatments depends most on the presence or absence of these three risk factors and less on the type of salvage treatment. Patients with none of these risk factors present have an excellent outcome if they are treated with non-cross-resistant chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, or both. Novel approaches are needed for patients with one or more of these factors present. Reports on salvage treatments for Hodgkin's disease in first relapse after primary chemotherapy should include data on the proportion of patients having stage IV disease at diagnosis, B symptoms at relapse, and a time from primary treatment to relapse of less than 1 year.

Neuromedin N: presence and chromatographic characterization in the rat

The distribution of neuromedin N and its structurally related peptide, neurotensin, was investigated in the rat and found to be remarkably similar with highest concentrations in the ileum. However, neuromedin N but not neurotensin was found in the kidney. Chromatographic analysis of immunoreactive neuromedin N demonstrated a single peak of immunoreactivity which was distinguishable from the single peak of immunoreactive neurotensin. Neuromedin N is likely to be a naturally occurring peptide and is distinct from neurotensin in rat peripheral tissues.