Abstract OT3-4-02: MINT I: Multi-Institutional Neo-adjuvant Therapy, MammaPrint Project I

Background: Women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) are often treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the size of the tumor prior to surgery, to enable breast conserving surgery and to observe the clinical effect of therapy in real time. Studies have shown that the 25–27% of individuals who have a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy have a survival advantage of 80% in 5 years, which is double the expected survival of the remaining patients without pCR. If patients who are likely to show a pCR could be identified prior to initiation of therapy, it would enable more informed treatment decisions – patients likely to respond would be served well by current neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols, while those unlikely to respond may be better suited to innovative new strategies for drug discovery [von Minckwitz et al. JCO 2006]. Genomics assays, which are widely used to provide prognostic and predictive information in early breast cancer, have the potential to provide information on the likelihood of a patient with LABC responding to neo-adjuvant therapy [Glück et al. ASCO 2012].

Trial design: MINT I is a prospective study designed to test the ability of molecular profiling, as well as traditional pathologic and clinical prognostic factors, to predict responsiveness to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LABC. MammaPrint risk profile, BluePrint molecular subtyping profile, TargetPrint estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 single gene readout, and the 56-gene TheraPrint Research Gene Panel will be analyzed on a fresh tumor specimen using the whole genome array. Patients will receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy pre-specified in the protocol. Response will be measured centrally. pCR is defined as the absence of invasive carcinoma in both the breast and axilla at microscopic examination of the resection specimen, regardless of the presence of carcinoma in situ.

Eligibility: The study will include women ≥18 years with histologically-proven invasive breast cancer T2 (≥3.5cm)-T4, N0M0 or T2-T4N1M0, adequate bone marrow reserves and normal renal and hepatic function who signed an IRB approved informed consent.

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to: 1. Determine the predictive power of MammaPrint and BluePrint for sensitivity to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy as measured by pCR.2. Compare TargetPrint ER, PR and HER2 with local and centralized IHC and/or CISH/FISH assessment.3. Identify correlations between TheraPrint and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.4. Identify and/or validate predictive gene expression profiles of clinical response or resistance to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.5. Compare BluePrint with IHC-based subtype classification.

Statistical methods: Standard statistical tests such as the Pearson Chi-square test will be used to characterize and evaluate the relationship between chemoresponsiveness and gene expression patterns.

Accrual: A total of 226 eligible patients will be enrolled from multiple institutions. To date (June 06, 2012), 31 patients have been enrolled.

Clinical trial registry number: NCT01501487.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-4-02.

Factors influencing accrual to ACOSOG Z0011, a randomized phase III trial of axillary dissection vs. observation for sentinel node positive breast cancer

601

Background: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group opened a phase III randomized trial to assess the value of axillary node dissection (ALND) after positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB). After 5.5 years, the trial closed due to poor accrual with only 891 patients of the planned 1900 accrued. The purpose of the current analysis is to assess factors impacting accrual to Z0011. Methods: Women having SNB for T1 or T2 breast cancer were eligible for participation in the Z0010 trial to assess the significance of micrometastases identified by immunohistochemistry. If the SN was positive for metastasis by H&E, the patient was eligible for randomization on Z0011 trial. Intraoperative (IOR) and postoperative randomization were allowed. Patients having SNB outside of the Z0010 trial were eligible. Results: 1003 patients from the Z0010 trial were eligible for randomization on Z0011. Of these, only 37% were entered in Z0011. Z0010 participants accounted for 42% of patients in Z0011. 16% of patients not randomized refused ALND. 69% of those not randomized had ALND. 67% of these had no additional positive nodes. Only 14% had ≥ 4 positive nodes. Enrollment of eligible Z0010 patients varied by type of institution: 25% at academic sites, 42% at teaching affiliated and 53% at community (p < 0.0001). By geographic region, sites in the South entered 42% of eligible patients compared with 24–36% in other geographic regions (p=0.0027). Only 32% of patients were consented for IOR based on frozen section of the SN. Sites in the South and West were less likely to use IOR (25% and 28%) compared to Northeast and Midwest (45% and 46%) (p < 0.0001). 110 sites participated in Z0011, yet 48% of patients were enrolled by 10% of sites. Conclusions: Failure of this important trial to accrue as planned is likely related to the clinical bias of physicians and patients to standard ALND. Yet, 2/3 of patients had no additional positive nodes and extensive nodal disease was infrequent. While it was thought that IOR might improve accrual to Z0011, the most successful sites were less likely to use this approach. Community surgeons were most successful in randomizing patients.

[Table: see text]

Improved staging of node-negative patients with intermediate to thick melanomas (>1 mm) with the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Elective lymph node dissection (ELND) may contribute to a survival benefit in certain stratified subsets of melanoma patients. We hypothesized that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (with complete node dissection if metastases are present) may improve both staging and survival of patients with clinically negative nodes, without subjecting all patients to the morbidity associated with complete ELND.

METHODS

We reviewed the data for all 14,914 N0 patients of the AJCC Melanoma Staging Database to determine the effect of SLN biopsy and ELND on staging and survival.

RESULTS

Retrospective analysis revealed that there was an apparent statistically significant survival advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas > 1 mm (n = 9024; 68.5% and 26.2% reduction in mortality compared with patients staged to be N0 by clinical exam and ELND, respectively; P < .0001). Five-year survivals were 90.5%, 77.7%, and 69.8%, respectfully, for patients staged by SLN biopsy (n = 2552), ELND (n = 2014), and clinical examination alone (n = 5192). The survival advantage of SLN biopsy was statistically significant for each T-stage category (T2, T3, and T4) and ulceration status. There was no advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas <1 mm (n = 5890).

CONCLUSIONS

SLN biopsy provides more accurate staging and may contribute to a survival benefit in populations of patients with melanoma.

Desmoplastic melanoma

Desmoplastic melanoma is an uncommonly encountered variant of malignant melanoma. Three histological subtypes exist: desmoplastic, neurotropic, and neural transforming. Desmoplastic melanoma commonly presents in conjunction with existing melanocytic lesions or as an amelanotic firm nodule. Local recurrences are common. Thirty patients over a 6-year period were treated at our institution for desmoplastic melanoma. All lesions were treated with local excision. Local recurrence occurred in seven patients (23%) and was treated by aggressive re-excision in each instance. Clinical regional metastasis (lymph nodal basins) were detected in two patients (6%). Distant metastasis (lung) developed in two patients (6%). Twenty-three patients (76%) were found to have desmoplastic subtype, whereas five (17%) had neurotropic subtype. Six patients (20%) had associated pigmented melanotic lesions. Average length of follow-up has been 18 months. Overall survival is 96 per cent. Presentations and histologic diagnosis can sometimes be difficult and misleading. Treatment is aggressive local excision with follow-up necessary to detect resectable recurrent lesions.

Molecular analysis in evaluating the sentinel node in malignant melanoma

The most powerful predictor of cancer mortality in solid tumors is the status of regional lymph nodes. If the presence or absence of regional nodal metastases will determine which patient receives formal dissection or which patient enters adjuvant therapy, then a technique is needed to accurately screen lymph node samples for occult disease. Routine histopathologic examination commonly underestimates the number of patient with metastases. The use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method increased the detection of nodal metastases exponentially. Studies have shown that RT-PCR is a sensitive, reproducible, and efficient technique with prognostic significance. If identification of micrometastases through RT-PCR can lead to improved clinical outcome, then this more accurate method of staging would become the new standard in cancer care.

Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS?

The appropriateness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with biopsy diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) has not been established. Three hundred forty-one patients presented with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Two hundred forty (70%) underwent sentinel node biopsy at their definitive procedure. All clinical and pathologic data were collected prospectively. Of 224 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS 23 (10%) were upstaged to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) at their definitive therapy and of 16 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCISM seven (44%) were upstaged to IDC. Excisional biopsies were no more sensitive for detecting IDC than was core biopsy. Lymph node metastases were detected in 26 of 195 (13%) patients with a definitive diagnosis of DCIS, in three of 15 (20%) with a definitive diagnosis of DCISM, and in eight of 30 (27%) with a definitive diagnosis of IDC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with DCIS and DCISM and is particularly needed in those undergoing mastectomy. No "high-risk" group of patients can be identified for selective sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for extremity sarcomas

BACKGROUND

The treatment options available for extremity sarcomas are amputation or limb-sparing surgery with radiation, which may incur significant morbidity and body disfigurement. Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) may be an attractive option in extremity sarcomas for unresectable lesions to preserve limb function and maintain quality of life.

METHODS

We report the outcomes of 5 patients who underwent HILP for unresectable primary or recurrent extremity sarcomas from 1994 to 2000 at our institution.

RESULTS

All patients had initial complete clinical responses to HILP, and the limb was salvaged in 4 of the 5 patients. Complications included chronic lymphedema, neuropathic pain, and prolonged wound healing.

CONCLUSIONS

HILP with melphalan is a safe and effective treatment option for selected patients with locally advanced and unresectable extremity sarcomas. The response rates are high, with limb salvage occurring in most patients. Further studies of larger groups of patients are warranted.

Learning curves and breast cancer lymphatic mapping: institutional volume index

INTRODUCTION

To date, studies of breast cancer lymphatic mapping (LM) have analyzed success with respect to individual surgeons. However, LM and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) are procedures that require institutional multidisciplinary cooperation between the departments of radiology, pathology, and surgery. Thus, it is important to evaluate these procedures with respect to the institution. This study examines 30 institutions to clarify the value of the institutional volume index (IVI) (cases/month) to the outcome of LM and SLNBx in breast cancer.

METHODS

From July 1997 to July 1999, 30 institutions participated in the Department of Defense national breast LM trial. All participants underwent a 2-day training course for surgeons, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists. The records for each institution were prospectively accrued and submitted to a database. The false negatives, failure rates, and IVI were calculated for each institution. A logistic regression model plots the relationship between IVI and institutional failure rate. Using a multivariate analysis, mapping failure was analyzed as a function of case number with respect to the individual surgeon and the institution as a whole.

RESULTS

False negative results were demonstrated in only 5 (4%) cases among all institutions and were excluded from further analysis due to small numbers. Mapping failures were found in all but 7 of the 30 institutions whose data were complete. There were 71 mapping failures among 74 surgeons over 555 cases, which yielded an overall failure rate of 12.79% (71 555). The logistic regression model revealed an inverse relationship between IVI and institutional failure rate. However, the multivariate analysis revealed that the individual surgeon performance was the most significant factor in determining institutional mapping success.

CONCLUSION

Failure to map can be a function of multiple factors including surgical skill, surgical volume index, and injection method of the SLN patient, all under the quality control of an institution. The surgical failure rate on the other hand is a function of surgical skill, surgical volume, and injection methods. While differences in mapping success exist across institutions, this disparity is not due to factors associated with the institution as a whole, but lie with the individual surgeon.

Surgical management of primary melanoma

A significant proportion of the general population is diagnosed with malignant melanoma each year, and more people die of melanoma now than at any time in the past. Consequently, treatment of melanoma at all stages of development is an important clinical issue. A variety of management options are discussed here, including biopsy techniques and treatment of the primary melanoma. The latter include lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion, and surgery for stage IV melanoma patients. Procedure-associated benefits and possible complications associated with each modality are also summarized.

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma

The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.

Metastatic melanoma to regional lymph nodes

There is an epidemic of melanoma in the United States and throughout most parts of the word. Recent advancements in the management of this disease has provided the patient with more options. The emerging technology of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy results in a more conservative, less morbid procedure to obtain nodal staging information. At the same time, providing the pathologist the 1-2 nodes from the basin most likely to contain metastatic disease, allows for a more detailed examination of the sentinel lymph node. This more detailed examination may include serial sectioning, immunohistochemical staining or even molecular biology techniques based on RT-PCR to provide more accurate staging. National trials are ongoing to examine the clinical relevance of the disease that is detected and the 'upstaging' that occurs with more sensitive assays for occult metastases.

Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the multicenter application of intraoperative lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and selective complete lymph node dissection (LM/SL/SCLND) for the management of early-stage melanoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The multidisciplinary technique of LM/SL/SCLND has been widely adopted, but not validated in a multicenter trial. The authors began the international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT) 5 years ago to evaluate the survival of patients with early-stage primary melanoma after wide excision alone versus wide excision plus LM/SL/SCLND. This study examined the accuracy of LM/SL/SCLND in the MSLT, using the experience of the organizing center (John Wayne Cancer Institute [JWCI]) as a standard for comparison.

METHODS

Before entering patients into the randomization phase, each center in the MSLT was required to finish a 30-case learning phase with complete nuclear medicine, pathology, and surgical review. Selection of MSLT patients in the LM/SL/SCLND treatment arm was based on complete pathologic and surgical data. The comparison group of JWCI patients was selected using these criteria: primary cutaneous melanoma having a thickness > or =1 mm with a Clark level > or =III, or a thickness <1 mm with a Clark level > or =IV (MSLT criterion); LM/SL performed between June 1, 1985, and December 30, 1998; and patient not entered in the MSLT. The accuracy of LM/SL/SCLND was determined by comparing the rates of sentinel node (SN) identification and the incidence of SN metastases in the MSLT and JWCI groups.

RESULTS

There were 551 patients in the MSLT group and 584 patients in the JWCI group. In both groups, LM performed with blue dye plus a radiocolloid was more successful (99.1 %) than LM performed with blue dye alone (95.2%) (p = 0.014). After a center had completed the 30-case learning phase, the success of SN identification in the MSLT group was independent of the center's case volume or experience in the MSLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy can be successfully learned and applied in a standardized fashion with high accuracy by centers worldwide. Successful SN identification rates of 97% can be achieved, and the incidence of nodal metastases approaches that of the organizing center. A multidisciplinary approach (surgery, nuclear medicine, and pathology) and a learning phase of > or =30 consecutive cases per center are sufficient for mastery of LM/SL in cutaneous melanoma. Lymphatic mapping performed using blue dye plus radiocolloid is superior to LM using blue dye alone.

Lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancers <1 centimeter (T1A-T1B)

Because of its high cost and attendant morbidity, the necessity of axillary dissection in patients with small invasive primary tumors has been questioned. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an alternative to complete axillary dissection; however, researchers have excluded patients with T1A-T1B lesions. Seven hundred patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers underwent an Institutional Review Board-approved prospective trial of intraoperative lymphatic mapping using a combination of Lymphazurin and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. An SLN was defined as a blue node and/or hot node with a 10:1 ex vivo radioactivity ratio in the SLN versus non-SLNs. All SLNs were evaluated by both hematoxylin and eosin and cytokeratin immunohistochemical stains. Of the 700 patients, 665 (95.0%) were mapped successfully. One hundred ninety-six (28.0%) had T1A-T1B tumors. Forty patients (20.4%) with T1A-T1B tumors had metastases to the SLNs. We conclude that breast cancer SLN mapping is highly accurate and sensitive when combined dye techniques (radiocolloid and vital blue dye) are utilized. This technique is particularly useful in patients with small invasive primary tumors, which, despite their size, still demonstrate a significant rate of axillary metastasis. These patients should not be excluded from lymphatic mapping protocols.

Parotid selective lymphadenectomy in malignant melanoma

Malignant melanoma of the head and neck can metastasize to lymph nodes within the parotid gland. Selective lymphadenectomy is the modern method of staging regional lymph node basins in clinically localized melanoma. This procedure involves intraoperative lymphatic mapping and directed, selective removal of the first draining nodes or sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Historically, the assessment of parotid lymph nodes would involve a superficial parotidectomy with facial nerve dissection. Since 1993, 28 patients with localized melanoma of the head and neck have demonstrated lymphatic drainage to parotid lymph nodes on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. The overall success rate of parotid selective lymphadenectomy is 86% (24 of 28 patients). Of the 28 patients, there were 6 early patients in whom blue dye alone was utilized intraoperatively, and the success rate is 50% (3 of 6 patients). When blue dye and radiocolloid mapping techniques are combined, the parotid selective lymphadenectomy is successful in 95% of patients (21 of 22 patients). Four of the 24 patients (17%) had metastases to the SLNs and underwent therapeutic superficial parotidectomy and/or modified radical neck dissection. After completion of the therapeutic superficial parotidectomy, 1 of the 4 patients was found to have an additional parotid (nonsentinel) node with melanoma metastases. None of the patients incurred injury to the facial nerve by parotid selective lymphadenectomy. To date, 2 of 28 patients (7%) have had regional recurrence to the parotid gland. Failure of the SLN technique may occur when blue dye alone is used, when human serum albumin (not sulfur colloid) is the radiocolloid, when prior wide excision and skin graft is present before lymphatic mapping, and when all SLNs are not retrieved. We conclude that parotid selective lymphadenectomy is a safe and reliable alternative to superficial parotidectomy for staging clinically localized melanoma of the head and neck.

Cutaneous lymphatic drainage in patients with grossly involved nodal basins

BACKGROUND

The development of lymphatic mapping techniques has facilitated the identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), the first node in the regional basin into which cutaneous lymphatics flow from a particular skin area. Previous studies have shown that SLN histology reflects the histology of the entire basin, because melanoma metastases progress in an orderly fashion, involving the SLN before higher nodes in the basin become involved with metastatic disease. It is uncertain whether these orderly cutaneous lymphatic flow patterns are maintained in grossly involved basins. Lymphatic mapping was performed in a population of melanoma patients with clinically palpable lymphadenopathy to address this question. We aimed to determine whether the presence of gross nodal disease in the basin alters lymphatic flow into that basin so that lymphatic mapping techniques are not applicable, and, in patients referred with a grossly involved basin, whether preoperative lymphoscintigraphy should be performed to identify other regional basins at risk for metastases.

METHODS

Eight patients presented with grossly palpable disease in the regional basin and underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. All patients with palpable disease and all basins indicated by lymphoscintigraphy to be at risk were dissected. Three patients presented with clinically palpable nodes at the time of diagnosis, and five developed nodal disease on clinical follow-up after undergoing initial wide local excision only. A total of 10 basins in the eight patients were dissected. Of these, eight of the basins had grossly palpable regional nodal disease, and the other two basins were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy as being at risk for metastases. The SLN was identified with intraoperative mapping, harvested, and submitted to pathology. Complete therapeutic lymph node dissections were performed following the SLN harvest in the basins with grossly palpable disease. SLN biopsy alone was performed in the two basins that did not have clinically palpable adenopathy but showed cutaneous lymphatic flow from the scintigram.

RESULTS

Sixteen SLNs were harvested from these eight basins with grossly palpable disease, and 14 (87.5%) contained tumor. In each case, one of the SLNs was the grossly palpable node, and in six of the basins (75%) it was the only site of melanoma metastases. An additional 190 higher level, non-SLNs were removed, 32 (16.8%) of which contained microscopic foci of metastatic melanoma (P = .015). The null hypothesis that melanoma nodal metastasis is a random event is rejected. Two patients with trunk melanoma primary sites were identified to have other basins at risk for metastatic disease on lymphoscintigraphy. SLN biopsies were performed in these two patients, and one had microscopic nodal disease in the SLN.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the fact that cutaneous lymphatic drainage patterns are maintained in patients with grossly involved basins, thus buttressing the idea that the SLN is the node most likely to develop metastatic disease. Gross disease in the basin does not significantly alter cutaneous lymphatic flow into the regional basin, as the sentinel lymph node identified under these circumstances is the same as with the grossly involved node. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who present with grossly involved nodes in one basin may identify other regional basins with micrometastatic disease and deserves further study in this setting.

Cytologic evaluation of lumpectomy margins in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Breast conservation therapy is controversial for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) due to recently reported high recurrence rates. We believe that cytologic evaluation of lumpectomy margins improves efficiency and leads to a lower recurrence rate following lumpectomy for DCIS.

METHODS

A prospectively accrued database of 1255 breast cancer patients at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute was found to have 218 patients with DCIS (17.4%). Of those 218 cases, 114 were treated with lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and radiation therapy; the remaining 104 patients were treated with mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Imprint cytology was used to evaluate all lumpectomy margins. Permanent sections and imprint cytology were reviewed by the same pathologist.

RESULTS

All lumpectomy specimens (116 tumors in 114 patients) were evaluated. The median follow up was 57.5 months (range 2-110 months). One hundred and three patients with 104 tumors were selected on the basis of pure DCIS (with or without microinvasion), and treated with lumpectomy, axillary dissection and radiation therapy. Of the 104 tumors utilizing attempted breast conservation therapy, 7 (6.6%) required mastectomy. There were 6 recurrences (6.1%) with a median time for recurrence of 47.5 months (range 27-85 months); four recurrences were comedo and two were noncomedo at original diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The determination of lumpectomy margins in DCIS patients using imprint cytology leads to an overall recurrence rate of 6.1% with reduction in operative time, and re-excision rate. Significant recurrence rates were associated with microinvasion and multifocal tumors (28%) versus simple DCIS at 5 years. Breast conservation therapy and surgical margin determination with imprint cytology for DCIS is a cost-effective and reliable method of treatment for simple DCIS.

A pilot study utilizing intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy for identification of the sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify sentinel lymph nodes using intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy.

METHODS

Technetium-99-labeled sulfur colloid was injected at the site of primary vulvar carcinoma. An intraoperative gamma counter was used to identify one or more sentinel lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent bilateral inguinal and femoral lymphadenectomy. The clinical stages are as follows: T1 in 6, T2 in 2, and T3 in 2. A total of four groins (3 patients) were positive for metastases. In one patient only the sentinel node was positive for disease. In a second patient, two unilateral nodes were positive for disease and both were identified with the gamma counter as sentinel nodes. In the third patient, a single sentinel node was positive for malignancy in each groin. Multiple nonsentinel lymph nodes were positive in each groin in this patient. In no case was the sentinel node negative when other nonsentinel nodes were positive.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy quantitatively identifies one or more sentinel lymph nodes. Since sentinel lymph nodes can be localized transcutaneously, this technique may be useful for selective lymphadenectomy. Larger patient accrual is necessary to verify this technique.

Menopausal Status and the Impact of Early Recurrence on Breast Cancer Survival

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer represents the leading form of invasive cancer among American women, killing nearly 50,000 annually. Several prognostic factors that are associated with survival include age, race, menopausal status, and the stage of disease at presentation. METHODS: Patient characteristics were collected based on a systematic chart audit of demographic features and medical, family, and social histories. We studied the survival of 220 patients with recurrent disease out of 1,429 consecutive patients with breast cancer seen over a 15-year period. RESULTS: Patients with a disease-free interval following diagnosis of less than 24 months were more frequently premenopausal and hormone receptor-negative than those with a disease-free interval of 24 months or greater. Patients with early recurrence had a shorter survival than patients with late recurrence. Menopausal status, nodal involvement, receptor status, and the site of recurrent disease were independent predictors of survival following recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Premenopausal women with early recurrence of breast cancer experience a significantly shorter survival than those with late recurrence, even after adjustment for hormone receptor status and site of recurrence. This effect was not seen in postmenopausal women.

The Role of Selective Lymphadenectomy in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: Axillary node dissection is considered a standard staging procedure in patients with breast cancer. The procedure is associated with significant morbidity and provides pathologists with many lymph nodes to evaluate. METHODS: A total of 174 women participated in a trial that included preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping using a combination of a vital blue dye and radiocolloid mapping. RESULTS: The intraoperative lymphatic mapping correctly identified a sentinel lymph node (SLN) in 160 (92%) of 174 patients. One skip metastasis (0.7%) occurred in 136 women who had a subsequent complete node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy using a combination of mapping techniques provide accurate nodal staging for women with breast cancer. With this technique, approximately 70% to 80% of women with no axillary metastases could be spared the morbidity of a complete node dissection.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in patients with malignant melanoma

Intra-operative sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and biopsy is a procedure that accurately stages the regional lymph node basin. Defined patterns of lymphatic drainage allow intra-operative determination of the first (sentinel) lymph node in the regional basin, and the absence of metastatic disease in the SLN accurately reflects the absence of melanoma in the remaining regional nodes. The use of a radiocolloid and a handheld gamma probe together with a vital blue dye provides optimal results, and allows for the successful identification of the SLN(s) in over 98 percent of the procedures. Close collaboration between surgeons, nuclear radiologists and pathologists is required to ensure optimal results. Surgical excision of the SLN allows for a more thorough and focused pathological examination of one or two nodes. Examination of serially sectioned SLNs by H&E staining, immunohistochemical staining and perhaps RT-PCR should reduce the number of patients with missed microscopic melanoma in the regional lymph nodes. Recently reported survival data from the Intergroup Melanoma Trial suggest that patients may benefit from identification and removal of regional lymph nodes that contain metastatic melanoma. Furthermore, the survival benefit recently reported in patients with melanoma metastatic to regional nodes prospectively randomized to receive high dose Interferon alfa-2b signals that the surgeons should aggressively examine patients for the presence of occult regional melanoma metastases. Intra-operative SLN mapping and SLN biopsy is a cost-effective procedure that allows accurate identification of regional lymph nodes that contain metastatic melanoma.

The adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma

Interferon alfa-2b has recently been approved by the FDA as the first effective adjuvant therapy for the treatment of the "high risk for recurrence" melanoma patient. In a landmark study (ECOG 1684), the use of high dose Interferon alfa-2b for one year in melanoma patients with either deep primary melanomas or resected nodal metastases resulted in significant increases in overall survival (p = 0.04) and disease-free survival (p < 0.01) compared to the control, observation arm. If one considers only those patients with nodal metastases (89% of the study population) the survival benefit associated with adjuvant Interferon alfa-2b had a p value of 0.008. This survival benefit is on par with the survival benefit experienced with the adjuvant therapy of either breast or colon cancer. Because of the survival benefit associated with the adjuvant therapy, one could argue that any melanoma patient with a significant risk of nodal metastases (tumor thickness greater than 1.0 mm) should have a nodal staging procedure. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy techniques are the least morbid and costly method to obtain this information. By performing nodal staging on patients with melanomas greater than 1.0 mm in thickness, effective adjuvant therapy can be applied in a selective fashion, exposing only those patients who have the most to benefit to the toxicities of the therapy.

Florida's undeclared epidemic: malignant melanoma

Contrary to the trend of early diagnosis observed in other parts of the world, in Florida melanoma is still being discovered in the more advanced stages. This is characterized by thicker lesions at diagnosis, which are hallmarked by bleeding, itching, ulceration, and increased vertical growth. In a study of 1,626 cutaneous melanoma patients at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida, three prognostic factors, tumor thickness, Clark level, and presence of ulceration in the primary tumor, have remained relatively constant over an eight-year period (1987-1994). Despite the lack of change in tumor thickness in the last four years, mortality rate is decreasing, possibly due to more effective treatments. Regardless of these apparent improvements in mortality rates, definite progress must be made in the early detection of malignant melanoma through the initiation of statewide programs of lay public and professional education. In addition, it is proposed that the establishment of statewide screening programs of the Caucasian population with skin phenotypes 1 and 2 will also facilitate the early diagnosis of melanoma in the future, improve the outlook for these patients, and begin to address a major public health problem in the state of Florida.

Investment in new technology research can save future health care dollars

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cost analysis of the emerging technology of lymphatic mapping for patients with malignant melanoma.

DESIGN

A retrospective, computer-aided chart and financial cost and charge review of consecutive patients with the diagnosis of melanoma registered at a cancer center from December, 1995 to March, 1996.

PARTICIPANTS

73 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of Stage 1 and 2 melanoma (cutaneous disease only) had nodal staging of their disease with either a sentinel node (SLN) biopsy or an elective complete node dissection (ELND). This was determined largely by patient choice and the protocol in operation at the time of the presentation of the patient to the clinic.

OUTCOMES MEASURED

There were no deaths in the series. Patient morbidity endpoints included rates of infection, incidence of extremity lymphedema, development of a seroma in the regional nodal basin wound and wound healing. Clinical outcome was measured by the ability to obtain complete nodal staging information with the new lymphatic mapping technology, and recurrence rates in the nodal basin after a negative SLN biopsy. Total charges, direct costs and total costs were calculated from all hospital, OR, pathology and lab charges. Professional fees were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Group 1 patients (50) had melanomas greater than 0.76 mm in thickness treated with a wide local excision (WLE), lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy under general anesthesia. Five patients (Group 2) had their procedure performed under a straight local anesthesia. Group 3 patients (18) had nodal staging performed with an elective node dissection. In Groups 1 and 2, if the SLN was positive for micrometastases, the patients were taken back to the OR for a complete node dissection. The total charges per patient were $13,835, $6,853 and $19,285, respectively. Significant dollar savings were achieved if the nodal staging could be accomplished with the lymphatic mapping technology (p = 0.001). Morbidity was significantly less in Groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3. After a mean follow-up of three years, only one patient has recurred in a SLN negative basin.

CONCLUSIONS

With 38,300 new cases of melanoma diagnosed each year in the United States, a projected savings of $172 million per year (general anesthesia) and $350 million per year (local anesthesia) could be realized if this new mapping technology could be incorporated into the care of the melanoma patient. Patient morbidity is minimized, nodal staging is complete and patients return to work sooner. Recently approved adjuvant therapy can be applied in a selective fashion, treating only those patients in which a documented benefit has been obtained, saving the health care system more dollars. Initial investment in defining the technology was minimal.

Comparison of psychological symptoms of women requesting removal of breast implants with those of breast cancer patients and healthy controls

Concern about the safety of silicone breast implants has led many women with numerous physical and psychological symptoms to seek breast implant removal. This retrospective group comparison study describes the psychological profile of women requesting breast implant removal compared with two control groups. The Brief Symptom Inventory was used to compare psychological symptoms of three groups of women: a preoperative breast implant group requesting removal of implants (n = 78), a postoperative breast cancer group without breast implants (n = 64), and a control group with no known breast disease and unknown breast implant status (n = 68). Scores were compared on the Global Severity Index of the Brief Symptom Inventory as well as on nine subscales: somatization, obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. The breast implant group had significantly elevated Global Severity Index scores, as well as somatization, obsessive-compulsiveness, depression, hostility, and anxiety subscale scores, when compared with the other groups. Post hoc data analysis revealed that women who had implants after subcutaneous mastectomy as prophylaxis for breast cancer (n = 18) had a significantly different symptom profile and higher Global Severity Index scores than women who had cosmetic augmentation (n = 53). Additionally, women who had subcutaneous mastectomy and implants had significantly higher subscales of interpersonal sensitivity, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism than the cosmetic implant subjects. Women requesting removal of silicone breast implants had greater psychological distress than women who were recently diagnosed with breast cancer or controls with no known breast disease and unknown implant status. Within the implant group, however, women who had subcutaneous mastectomy showed greater psychological disturbance than those who had augmentation mammaplasty.

Redefining cutaneous lymphatic flow: the necessity of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in the management of malignant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to emphasize the instrumental role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in the surgical treatment of patients with malignant melanoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The efficacy of lymphoscintigraphy is reflected in its ability to reveal cutaneous lymphatic drainage to regional nodal basins that are at risk for melanoma metastases but not necessarily discernable to be at risk through standard historical anatomical guidelines or clinical experience. This preoperative lymphatic mapping technique has contributed greatly to the accuracy and efficiency of staging procedures including sentinel node biopsy and elective lymph node dissection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After informed consent, a selected series of four patients with primary melanomas located in watershed areas of the body (left neck, right mid-abdomen, right scapula, left back) and two patients with extremity melanomas (right distal forearm and left ankle) underwent pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy to identify all basins for metastases.

RESULTS

In all of the cases, lymphatic drainage occurred in an unusual and unexpected basin that could not have been predicted clinically and in three of the cases the resected basins contained positive sentinel nodes. If not for the preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, these nodal basins would not have been resected and metastatic disease would have been left behind. In addition, the staging of the melanoma patient would have been inaccurate.

CONCLUSION

If the sentinel node biopsy of elective lymph node dissection (ELND) were based on clinical predictions only, nodes equally at risk for metastatic disease would not have been resected and in some cases, nodal basins not at risk for metastases would have been resected unnecessarily. Without lymphoscintigraphy, the validity and efficacy of the ELND or the sentinel node biopsy for nodal staging is greatly compromised. These six case studies illustrate the difficulty of predicating lymphatic drainage from primary sites located on the head and neck, truck and even the extremities and demonstrate the indispensability of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in the management of malignant melanoma.

Importance of race on breast cancer survival

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survival has been shown to be significantly less among black women than white women. The reason for this difference in survival is unclear.

METHODS

Data were obtained retrospectively on 439 women seen between 1985 and 1993 based on a detailed chart audit. The impact of race and several known prognostic factors on overall survival, time to relapse, and survival after relapse were studied.

RESULTS

Black women with breast cancer were found to have a greater risk of recurrence, shorter overall survival, and shorter survival after relapse than did white women. Black patients were found to be younger and have higher stage of disease and lower hormone receptor levels than were white patients. After adjustment for menopausal status and disease stage, a significant independent effect of race was observed on overall survival but not risk of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, a significant interaction was observed between race and age in some models. Survival after recurrence of disease was lower among black than white women after adjustment for menopausal status and estrogen receptor level.

CONCLUSION

Black women experience shorter survival times than do white women, including a shorter survival time after disease recurrence. Breast cancer in black women is associated with younger age, higher stage at presentation, and low hormone receptor levels. After adjustment for known prognostic factors, race remains a significant independent predictor of breast cancer survival.

Recent advances in the care of the patient with malignant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The authors review the recent advances in the surgical care, staging, and adjuvant treatment of the patient with melanoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Melanoma care has not changed significantly in the last 20 years, and the controversy of elective lymph node dissections in this disease continues to be discussed. Two advances in the care of the patient with melanoma have occurred in the last 3 years to make this an exciting time for clinicians and to offer more hope for the patients with this disease. The concept of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), defined by Morton as the first node in the lymphatic basin that drains the primary melanoma, has been documented to contain the first site of metastatic disease. This technology can be used to stage nodally the melanoma patient, identifying the subgroup of patients (stage III) who have a 5-year survival rate less than 50%. Members of this group are candidates for effective adjuvant therapies.

METHODS

A review of the surgical techniques of melanoma care, including recently reported new studies of elective node dissection (ELND) and SLN biopsy in patients with melanoma was performed. In addition, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1684 trial, which was the basis for the Food and Drug Administration approval of adjuvant interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) is discussed.

RESULTS

The Intergroup Melanoma Trial has reported a survival benefit for performing ELND in patients with melanoma and tumor thickness between 1 and 2 mm or in patients that are younger than 60 years of age. With six reports in the literature that show there is an order to melanoma nodal metastases and that the SLN histology is reflective of the histology of the remainder of the nodal basin, the more conservative SLN biopsy can be performed to adequately stage nodally the patient with melanoma. Patients with nodal metastases who are rendered free of disease with surgical resection have the most to benefit from adjuvant IF-alpha-2b. If one considers only the lymph node-positive group of patients, the survival benefit associate with adjuvant IFN is significant (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

New standards of care for the melanoma patient have been established. Patients at high risk for recurrence have been shown to experience a survival benefit with adjuvant IFN-alpha-2b. With these data, the argument can be made that all patients with melanoma greater than 1 mm should have a nodal staging procedure. Selective lymphadenectomy with SLN biopsy is the least morbid procedure that can be used to obtain this information. If surgeons do not have the nuclear medicine or pathology support to perform lymphatic mapping, then the guidelines of the Intergroup Melanoma Study should be used to apply ELND in a selective fashion. In this way, patients are identified with micrometastatic disease early in their clinical course and can be offered the survival benefit of adjuvant therapy.

Computer database for melanoma registry. A clinical management and research tool to monitor outcomes and ensure continuous quality improvement

The need for an efficient method of handling data is more apparent today in medical practice than at any time in the past. This PC-based database helps with the daily collection, filing, storage, and abstraction of data for clinical management and research. The program also provides a mechanism for continuous quality assessment to monitor clinical standards of care and make interventions to improve the care of the melanoma patient.

Evaluation of new putative tumor markers for melanoma

BACKGROUND

The early diagnosis of recurrent melanoma can contribute to better outcome if the disease can be surgically resected or if the metastases are responsive to systemic therapies. Lipid-associated sialic acid (LASA-P) and the S-100 protein (S-100) were evaluated as tumor markers for melanoma with the goal of early detection of recurrence.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients were identified who had levels of S-100 and LASA-P drawn during their clinical course. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the significance of the serum markers in relation to other prognostic factors for melanoma.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 30 months, 58 patients had recurrences, and 49 patients died of disease. LASA-P elevation was not associated with the time to recurrence (p = 0.2176) or survival (p = 0.2507). S-100 positivity was a significant predictor of recurrence (p < 0.0001) and survival (p = 0.0059). The median time to recurrence for S-100-positive and S-100-negative patients was 7.6 and 33.8 months, respectively. The median survival time was 59.2 months for S-100-negative patients and 29.6 months for patients positive for S-100.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum S-100 shows significant correlations to both time to recurrence and survival and could be useful in the clinical detection of malignant melanoma.

The use of intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node biopsy in patients with malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Selective lymphadenectomy or "sentinel node" biopsy has been introduced recently by Morton and colleagues (Arch Surg 1992;127:392-9) to stage patients with intermediate and thick malignant melanomas. It has proven to be an effective way to identify nodal basins at risk for metastasis without the morbidity of a complete lymph node dissection. The majority of biopsies can be performed under local anesthesia with small incisions, but technical difficulties occasionally result in unsuccessful explorations. Identification of the sentinel node can be enhanced by a intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy, a technique introduced Alex and Krag (Surg Oncol 1993;137-43) that uses radiolabeled sulfur colloid and a hand-held gamma probe.

OBJECTIVE

We used intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy in conjunction with 1% lymphazurin blue dye to define the sentinel node(s) in 148 patients with greater than 0.76 mm in thickness or Clark level IV melanomas. Sentinel lymph nodes were isolated, harvested, and examined using conventional histopathology, and immunohistochemistry for S-100 and HMB-45 antibodies.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of sentinel lymph node localization was 97% using a combination of the two techniques. Twenty-one (14%) patients had micrometastasis, and 17 of these subsequently underwent complete lymph node dissection. A total of 220 of 275 (80%) sentinel nodes harvested were radioactive or "hot" compared with 165 of 275 (60%) with the blue dye alone. Four of the patients with micrometastasis had sentinel nodes positive by gamma probe, but negative by blue dye mapping techniques.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy using a hand-held gamma detecting probe improves the identification of sentinel lymph nodes during selective lymphadenectomy. This may reduce the number of "unsuccessful explorations" using the vital blue dye technique for lymphatic mapping, and appeal to a greater variety of surgeons, including dermatologic surgeons.

Medical-legal pitfalls for the breast surgeon: incomplete mammographic localization of suspicious lesions and the correlation between palpable and mammographic abnormalities

In approximately 5 per cent of mammographically detected lesions, the mammographic abnormality is present in only one view, either craniocaudal or mediolateral. In such a scenario, the physician has been left with the option of closely following the lesion, hoping it will eventually become apparent in two views, or guessing the approximate location of the lesion for subsequent open biopsy. However, with today's advances in technology, CT scan and its production of a three-dimensional image can compensate for mammography's two-dimensional limitation. With diminished need for identification on two mammographic views, localization in these instances falls more within the realm of possibility. This paper highlights Moffitt Cancer Center's experience with CT-directed breast biopsy as an alternative to close follow-up or blind-biopsy. In addition, because palpable breast abnormalities may not be the same as mammographic abnormalities, the report details the accuracy of CT-directed biopsy in allowing the surgeon to perform precise open biopsy, thus avoiding medical-legal exposure.

More rational and conservative surgical strategies for malignant melanoma using lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy techniques

Stimulated by novel lymphatic mapping techniques, the surgical care of the melanoma patient is becoming more conservative. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can identify all regional nodal basins at risk for metastatic disease, areas of "intransit" nodal collections, and the location and number of the primary draining nodes in relation to the rest of the nodes in the basin. Intraoperative mapping techniques, using a combination of a vital blue dye and a radioactive tracer, can then be used to harvest this first draining node, termed the sentinel node, for examination. It is clear that the most powerful prognostic factor for any solid tumor, including melanoma, is the presence or absence of regional lymph node disease. However, routine histologic examination may underestimate the number of patients with nodal disease. Serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining, techniques that have been available for years, can increase the yield of positive dissections compared with routine histology. The selective approach to the nodal basin would allow the pathologist to be more detailed in examining the harvested sentinel node, providing more accurate staging information for melanoma.