1
|
Beck RW, Raghinaru D, Calhoun P, Bergenstal RM. A Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Measured Time-in-Range 70-180 mg/dL Versus Time-in-Tight-Range 70-140 mg/dL. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:151-155. [PMID: 37870460 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-measured time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) and time-in-tight-range 70-140 mg/dL (TITR). Methods: TIR and TITR were calculated from CGM data collected using blinded or unblinded Dexcom sensors from 9 studies with 912 participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 2 studies with 184 participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The TIR-TITR relationship was assessed overall and stratified by coefficient of variation (CV) and by time below range <70 mg/dL (TBR). Results: The correlation between TIR and TITR was 0.94. TITR was higher for a given TIR for T2D compared with T1D. However, after adjusting for the differences in CV or TBR, both of which were higher with T1D than T2D, the differences were minimized. The TIR-TITR relationship was nonlinear, with a higher ratio of TITR:TIR observed as TIR increased ranging from 0.42 when TIR was 20% to 0.66 when TIR was 80%. Similarly, as TITR increased, the ratio of TIR:TITR decreased, varying from 2.6 with TITR of 10% to 1.3 for TITR of 70%. The TIR-TITR relationship varied according to CV and TBR, such that the higher the CV or higher the amount of TBR the greater was TITR for a given TIR. Conclusions: TIR and TITR are highly correlated, although the relationship is nonlinear. With knowledge of TIR, TITR can be estimated with reasonable precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy W Beck
- JAEB Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- JAEB Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Calhoun
- JAEB Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aleppo G, Gal RL, Raghinaru D, Kruger D, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Cushman T, Hood KK, Johnson ML, McArthur T, Bradshaw A, Olson BA, Oser SM, Oser TK, Kollman C, Weinstock RS. Comprehensive Telehealth Model to Support Diabetes Self-Management. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2336876. [PMID: 37792375 PMCID: PMC10551767 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance As the number of patients with diabetes continues to increase in the United States, novel approaches to clinical care access should be considered to meet the care needs for this population, including support for diabetes-related technology. Objective To evaluate a virtual clinic to facilitate comprehensive diabetes care, support continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) integration into diabetes self-management, and provide behavioral health support for diabetes-related issues. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was a prospective, single-arm, remote study involving adult participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were referred through community resources. The study was conducted virtually from August 24, 2020, to May 26, 2022; analysis was conducted at the clinical coordinating center. Intervention Training and education led by a Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist for CGM use through a virtual endocrinology clinic structure, which included endocrinologists and behavioral health team members. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes included CGM-measured mean glucose level, coefficient of variation, and time in range (TIR) of 70 to 180 mg/dL, time with values greater than 180 mg/dL or 250 mg/dL, and time with values less than 70 mg/dL or 54 mg/dL. Hemoglobin A1c was measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results Among the 234 participants, 160 had type 1 diabetes and 74 had type 2 diabetes. The mean (SD) age was 47 (14) years, 123 (53%) were female, and median diabetes duration was 20 years. Median (IQR) CGM use over 6 months was 96% (91%-98%) for participants with type 1 diabetes and 94% (85%-97%) for those with type 2 diabetes. Mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in those with type 1 diabetes decreased from 7.8% (1.6%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.0%) at 3 months and 7.1% (1.0%) at 6 months (mean change from baseline to 6 months, -0.6%, 95% CI, -0.8% to -0.5%; P < .001), with an 11% mean TIR increase over 6 months (95% CI, 9% to 14%; P < .001). Mean HbA1c in participants with type 2 diabetes decreased from 8.1% (1.7%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.0%) at 3 months and 7.1% (0.9%) at 6 months (mean change from baseline to 6 months, -1.0%; 95% CI, -1.4% to -0.7%; P < .001), with an 18% TIR increase over 6 months (95% CI, 13% to 24%; P < .001). In participants with type 1 diabetes, mean percentage of time with values less than 70 mg/dL and less than 54 mg/dL decreased over 6 months by 0.8% (95% CI, -1.2% to -0.4%; P = .001) and by 0.3% (95% CI, -0.5% to -0.2%, P < .001), respectively. In the type 2 diabetes group, hypoglycemia was rare (mean [SD] percentage of time <70 mg/dL, 0.5% [0.6%]; and <54 mg/dL, 0.07% [0.14%], over 6 months). Conclusions and Relevance Results from this cohort study demonstrated clinical benefits associated with implementation of a comprehensive care model that included diabetes education. This model of care has potential to reach a large portion of patients with diabetes, facilitate diabetes technology adoption, and improve glucose control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Aleppo
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robin L Gal
- Jaeb Center for Health and Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health and Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | - Korey K Hood
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | | - Sean M Oser
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levy CJ, Raghinaru D, Kudva YC, Pandit K, Blevins T, Casaubon L, Desjardins D, Levister CM, O’Malley G, Reid C, Lum J, Kollman C, Beck RW. Beneficial Effects of Control-IQ Automated Insulin Delivery in Basal-Bolus and Basal-Only Insulin Users With Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2023; 42:116-124. [PMID: 38230336 PMCID: PMC10788662 DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
The t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology (Control-IQ) advanced hybrid closed-loop automated insulin delivery system was evaluated in this prospective single-arm trial. Thirty adults with type 2 diabetes using the Control-IQ system showed substantial glycemic improvement with no increase in hypoglycemia. Mean time in range (70-180 mg/dL) improved 15%, representing an increase of 3.6 hours/day, and mean glucose decreased by 22 mg/dL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Keta Pandit
- Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology, Austin, TX
| | | | | | - Donna Desjardins
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Camilla M. Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Grenye O’Malley
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Corey Reid
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - John Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ekhlaspour L, Raghinaru D, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Kudva YC, Lam DW, Levister C, O’Malley G, Church MM, Lum JW, Buckingham B, Brown SA. Outcomes in Pump- and CGM-Baseline Use Subgroups in the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:935-942. [PMID: 35473359 PMCID: PMC10347978 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221089361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the potential benefits of automated insulin delivery (AID) among individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in sub-populations of baseline device use determined by continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use status and insulin delivery via multiple daily injections (MDI) or insulin pump. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a six-month randomized, multicenter trial, 168 individuals were assigned to closed-loop control (CLC, Control-IQ, Tandem Diabetes Care), or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. The trial included a two- to eight-week run-in phase to train participants on study devices. The participants were stratified into four subgroups: insulin pump and CGM (pump+CGM), pump-only, MDI and CGM (MDI+CGM), and MDI users without CGM (MDI-only) users. We compared glycemic outcomes among four subgroups. RESULTS At baseline, 61% were pump+CGM users, 18% pump-only users, 10% MDI+CGM users, and 11% MDI-only users. Mean time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) improved from baseline in the four subgroups using CLC: pump+CGM, 62% to 73%; pump-only, 61% to 70%; MDI+CGM, 54% to 68%; and MDI-only, 61% to 69%. The reduction in time below 70 mg/dL from baseline was comparable among the four subgroups. No interaction effect was detected with baseline device use for TIR (P = .67) or time below (P = .77). On the System Usability Questionnaire, scores were high at 26 weeks for all subgroups: pump+CGM: 87.2 ± 12.1, pump-only: 89.4 ± 8.2, MDI+CGM 87.2 ± 9.3, MDI: 78.1 ± 15. CONCLUSIONS There was a consistent benefit in patients with T1D when using CLC, regardless of baseline insulin delivery modality or CGM use. These data suggest that this CLC system can be considered across a wide range of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elvira Isganaitis
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W. Lam
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Camilla Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Grenye O’Malley
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beck RW, Raghinaru D, Calhoun P, Bergenstal RM. The Relationship Between Percent Time <70 mg/dL and Percent Time <54 mg/dL Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:157-160. [PMID: 36576488 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective: While it is recognized that there is a strong relationship between the amount of time glucose levels are <70 mg/dL (T<70) and the amount of time <54 mg/dL (T<54), the association has not been well quantified. Methods: Datasets with Dexcom continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from nine type 1 diabetes randomized trials were pooled to evaluate the relationship between CGM-measured T<70 and T<54. Penalized B-spline regression lines were fitted to assess the relationship between T<70 and T<54 for blinded CGM use, unblinded CGM use without an automated insulin delivery (AID) system, and unblinded CGM use with an AID system. Results: For blinded data, the T<54 : T<70 ratio varied from 19% when the amount of T<70 was <1% to 44% when the amount of T<70 was ≥7% whereas for unblinded data the ratio varied from 15% to 42%, respectively. When T<70 was 4%, the predicted T<54 was 1.18%, 0.94%, and 0.91% for the blinded, unblinded, and AID data, respectively (P<0.001 comparing blinded versus unblinded and AID). Conclusions: The T<54 : T<70 ratio increases with greater T<70, and the ratio generally is higher with blinded than unblinded CGM data, with the latter appearing to be similar to AID system data. The finding of greater T<54 for a given T<70 with blinded CGM data is presumed to be due to an action being taken by the unblinded CGM user and/or by the AID system to minimize hypoglycemia which will have the effect of reducing the amount of T<54.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy W Beck
- JAEB Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- JAEB Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Calhoun
- JAEB Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raghinaru D, Calhoun P, Bergenstal RM, Beck RW. The Optimal Duration of a Run-In Period to Initiate Continuous Glucose Monitoring for a Randomized Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:868-872. [PMID: 35920822 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To determine the optimal duration of a run-in period for initiation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) before the start of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Data sets were pooled from 8 RCTs, which had a blinded CGM wear period followed by at least 3 months of unblinded CGM use. Across all participants, mean time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) and mean time <54 mg/dL (T < 54) as well as other key CGM metrics were computed for the initial period of blinded CGM wear and from the subsequent 13 weeks of unblinded CGM use. Results: The analysis cohort included data from 485 participants: 348 with T1D and 137 with T2D, ranging in age from 2 to 82 years. Mean TIR was 49% with blinded CGM before initiation of unblinded CGM use, increased to 55% by the end of the first week of unblinded CGM use, and then showed little change through 13 weeks. Mean T < 54 decreased from 1.4% with blinded CGM to 0.8% 1 week and 0.6% 2 weeks after initiating unblinded CGM use, which matched the value in month 3. Similar results were obtained for mean glucose, time >180 mg/dL, time >250 mg/dL, and time <70 mg/dL, with the mean improvement in hyperglycemia metrics plateauing slightly faster than hypoglycemia metrics. Findings were largely similar for T1D and T2D. Conclusion: When initiating unblinded real-time CGM, improvement in key CGM metrics occurs rapidly, with maximal effect on the mean of each metric achieved within 1-2 weeks. For a randomized trial in which all participants will use real-time unblinded CGM for glucose monitoring, a run-in period should be implemented before collecting baseline data for participants who are not CGM users. For such CGM-naive individuals, a 7- to 14-day acclimation period is sufficient followed by a 14-day period for collection of baseline unblinded CGM data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Calhoun
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Deshpande S, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Church MM, Desrochers H, Ekhlaspour L, Kaur RJ, Levister C, Shi D, Lum JW, Kollman C, Doyle FJ. Outpatient Randomized Crossover Comparison of Zone Model Predictive Control Automated Insulin Delivery with Weekly Data Driven Adaptation Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump: Results from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial 4. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:635-642. [PMID: 35549708 PMCID: PMC9422791 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven effective in increasing time-in-range during both clinical trials and real-world use. Further improvements in outcomes for single-hormone (insulin only) AID may be limited by suboptimal insulin delivery settings. Methods: Adults (≥18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes were randomized to either sensor-augmented pump (SAP) (inclusive of predictive low-glucose suspend) or adaptive zone model predictive control AID for 13 weeks, then crossed over to the other arm. Each week, the AID insulin delivery settings were sequentially and automatically updated by an adaptation system running on the study phone. Primary outcome was sensor glucose time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, with noninferiority in percent time below 54 mg/dL as a hierarchical outcome. Results: Thirty-five participants completed the trial (mean age 39 ± 16 years, HbA1c at enrollment 6.9% ± 1.0%). Mean time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL was 66% with SAP versus 69% with AID (mean adjusted difference +2% [95% confidence interval: -1% to +6%], P = 0.22). Median time <70 mg/dL improved from 3.0% with SAP to 1.6% with AID (-1.5% [-2.4% to -0.5%], P = 0.002). The adaptation system decreased initial basal rates by a median of 4% (-8%, 16%) and increased initial carbohydrate ratios by a median of 45% (32%, 59%) after 13 weeks. Conclusions: Automated adaptation of insulin delivery settings with AID use did not significantly improve time-in-range in this very well-controlled population. Additional study and further refinement of the adaptation system are needed, especially in populations with differing degrees of baseline glycemic control, who may show larger benefits from adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eyal Dassau
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sunil Deshpande
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Hannah Desrochers
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ravinder Jeet Kaur
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Camilla Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dawei Shi
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Francis J. Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ekhlaspour L, Town M, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Brown SA, Buckingham BA. Glycemic Outcomes in Baseline Hemoglobin A1C Subgroups in the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:588-591. [PMID: 35020488 PMCID: PMC9353995 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Using a closed-loop system significantly improves time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). In a 6-month RCT, 112 subjects were randomly assigned to closed-loop control (Tandem Control-IQ) after obtaining 2 weeks of baseline Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from sensor-augmented pump therapy. We compared glycemic outcomes from baseline to end of study among subgroups classified by baseline HbA1c levels. All HbA1c subgroups showed an improvement in TIR due to reduction of both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Those with HbA1c <6.5% improved mostly by reducing nocturnal hypoglycemia due to the automated basal insulin adjustments. Those with HbA1c ≥8.5% improved mostly by reducing daytime and nocturnal hyperglycemia due to both automated basal insulin adjustments and correction boluses during the day. There does not appear to be any reason to exclude individuals with T1D from automated insulin delivery based on their HbA1c. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT03563313.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Academic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Address correspondence to: Laya Ekhlaspour, MD, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Academic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 453 Quarry Road, MC 5660, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Marissa Town
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Academic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Academic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Levy CJ, O'Malley G, Raghinaru D, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Pinsker JE, Lum JW, Brown SA. Insulin Delivery and Glucose Variability Throughout the Menstrual Cycle on Closed Loop Control for Women with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:357-361. [PMID: 35099294 PMCID: PMC9127830 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To analyze insulin delivery and glycemic metrics throughout the menstrual cycle for women with type 1 diabetes using closed loop control (CLC) insulin delivery. Methods: Menstruating women using a CLC system in a clinical trial were invited to record their menstrual cycles through a cycle-tracking application. Sixteen participants provided data for this secondary analysis over three or more complete cycles. Insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were analyzed in relation to reported cycle phases. Results: Insulin delivery and CGM metrics remained consistent during cycle phases. Intraparticipant variability of CGM metrics and weight-based insulin delivery did not change through cycle phases. Conclusions: For this sample of menstruating women with type 1 diabetes using a CLC system, insulin delivery and glycemic metrics remained stable throughout menstrual cycle phases. Additional studies in this population are needed, particularly among women who report variable glycemic control during their cycles. Trial Registration: NCT03591354.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol J. Levy
- Deparment of Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Diseases, Mount Sinai Diabetes Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Grenye O'Malley
- Deparment of Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Diseases, Mount Sinai Diabetes Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Division, Department of Medicine, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Brown SA, Raghinaru D, Pinsker JE, Ekhlaspour L, Levy CJ, Messer LH, Kovatchev BP, Lum JW, Beck RW, Gonder-Frederick L. Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control: The Pivotal International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:673-683. [PMID: 34115959 PMCID: PMC8573794 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Closed-loop control (CLC) has been shown to improve glucose time in range and other glucose metrics; however, randomized trials >3 months comparing CLC with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy are limited. We recently reported glucose control outcomes from the 6-month international Diabetes Closed-Loop (iDCL) trial; we now report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in this iDCL trial. Methods: Participants were randomized 2:1 to CLC (N = 112) versus SAP (N = 56) and completed questionnaires, including Hypoglycemia Fear Survey, Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Hypoglycemia Awareness, Hypoglycemia Confidence, Hyperglycemia Avoidance, and Positive Expectancies of CLC (INSPIRE) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. CLC participants also completed Diabetes Technology Expectations and Acceptance and System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: The Hypoglycemia Fear Survey Behavior subscale improved significantly after 6 months of CLC compared with SAP. DDS did not differ except for powerless subscale scores, which worsened at 3 months in SAP. Whereas Hypoglycemia Awareness and Hyperglycemia Avoidance did not differ between groups, CLC participants showed a tendency toward improved confidence in managing hypoglycemia. The INSPIRE questionnaire showed favorable scores in the CLC group for teens and parents, with a similar trend for adults. At baseline and 6 months, CLC participants had high positive expectations for the device with Diabetes Technology Acceptance and SUS showing high benefit and low burden scores. Conclusion: CLC improved some PROs compared with SAP. Participants reported high benefit and low burden with CLC. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT03563313.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Laurel H. Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Boris P. Kovatchev
- University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Address correspondence to: John W. Lum, MS, Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Dr, Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33647, USA.
| | - Roy W. Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Isganaitis E, Raghinaru D, Ambler-Osborn L, Pinsker JE, Buckingham BA, Wadwa RP, Ekhlaspour L, Kudva YC, Levy CJ, Forlenza GP, Beck RW, Kollman C, Lum JW, Brown SA, Laffel LM. Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy Improves Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults: Outcomes from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:342-349. [PMID: 33216667 PMCID: PMC8080922 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of closed-loop control (CLC) insulin delivery system in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: Prespecified subanalysis of outcomes in adolescents and young adults aged 14-24 years old with type 1 diabetes in a previously published 6-month multicenter randomized trial. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to CLC (Tandem Control-IQ) or sensor augmented pump (SAP, various pumps+Dexcom G6 CGM) and followed for 6 months. Results: Mean age of the 63 participants was 17 years, median type 1 diabetes duration was 7 years, and mean baseline HbA1c was 8.1%. All 63 completed the trial. Time in range (TIR) increased by 13% with CLC versus decreasing by 1% with SAP (adjusted treatment group difference = +13% [+3.1 h/day]; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9-16, P < 0.001), which largely reflected a reduction in time >180 mg/dL (adjusted difference -12% [-2.9 h/day], P < 0.001). Time <70 mg/dL decreased by 1.6% with CLC versus 0.3% with SAP (adjusted difference -0.7% [-10 min/day], 95% CI -1.0% to -0.2%, P = 0.002). CLC use averaged 89% of the time for 6 months. The mean adjusted difference in HbA1c after 6 months was 0.30% in CLC versus SAP (95% CI -0.67 to +0.08, P = 0.13). There was one diabetic ketoacidosis episode in the CLC group. Conclusions: CLC use for 6 months was substantial and associated with improved TIR and reduced hypoglycemia in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Thus, CLC has the potential to improve glycemic outcomes in this challenging age group. The clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03563313).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira Isganaitis
- Research Division, Department of Pediatrics, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Louise Ambler-Osborn
- Research Division, Department of Pediatrics, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford Children's Health, Stanford, California, USA
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford Children's Health, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Diseases, Mount Sinai Diabetes Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Roy W. Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Division, Department of Medicine, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Research Division, Department of Pediatrics, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O'Malley G, Messer LH, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Kudva YC, Ekhlaspour L, Raghinaru D, Lum J, Brown SA. Clinical Management and Pump Parameter Adjustment of the Control-IQ Closed-Loop Control System: Results from a 6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:245-252. [PMID: 33155824 PMCID: PMC8114941 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Data are limited on the need for and benefits of pump setting optimization with automated insulin delivery. We examined clinical management of a closed-loop control (CLC) system and its relationship to glycemic outcomes. Materials and Methods: We analyzed personal parameter adjustments in 168 participants in a 6-month multicenter trial of CLC with Control-IQ versus sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Preset parameters (BR = basal rates, CF = correction factors, CR = carbohydrate ratios) were optimized at randomization, 2 and 13 weeks, for safety issues, participant concerns, or initiation by participants' usual diabetes care team. Time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL) was compared in the week before and after parameter changes. Results: In 607 encounters for parameter changes, there were fewer adjustments for CLC than SAP (3.4 vs. 4.1/participant). Adjustments involved BR (CLC 69%, SAP 80%), CR (CLC 68%, SAP 50%), CF (CLC 44%, SAP 41%), and overnight parameters (CLC 62%, SAP 75%). TIR before and after adjustments was 71.2% and 71.3% for CLC and 61.0% and 62.9% for SAP. The highest baseline HbA1c CLC subgroup had the largest TIR improvement (51.2% vs. 57.7%). When a CR was made more aggressive in the CLC group, postprandial time >180 mg/dL was 43.1% before the change and 36.0% after the change. The median postprandial time <70 mg/dL before making CR less aggressive was 1.8%, and after the change was 0.7%. Conclusions: No difference in TIR was detected with parameter changes overall, but they may have an effect in higher HbA1c subgroups or following user-directed boluses, suggesting that changes may matter more in suboptimal control or during discrete periods of the day. Clinical Trials Registration number: NCT03563313.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grenye O'Malley
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Laurel H. Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elvira Isganaitis
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Address correspondence to: John Lum, MS, Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33647, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brown SA, Beck RW, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Laffel LM, Wadwa RP, Kudva YC, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Ambler-Osborn L, Anderson SM, Church MM, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Levister C, Simha V, Breton MD, Kollman C, Lum JW, Kovatchev BP. Glycemic Outcomes of Use of CLC Versus PLGS in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:1822-1828. [PMID: 32471910 PMCID: PMC7372060 DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited information is available about glycemic outcomes with a closed-loop control (CLC) system compared with a predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After 6 months of use of a CLC system in a randomized trial, 109 participants with type 1 diabetes (age range, 14-72 years; mean HbA1c, 7.1% [54 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned to CLC (N = 54, Control-IQ) or PLGS (N = 55, Basal-IQ) groups for 3 months. The primary outcome was continuous glucose monitor (CGM)-measured time in range (TIR) for 70-180 mg/dL. Baseline CGM metrics were computed from the last 3 months of the preceding study. RESULTS All 109 participants completed the study. Mean ± SD TIR was 71.1 ± 11.2% at baseline and 67.6 ± 12.6% using intention-to-treat analysis (69.1 ± 12.2% using per-protocol analysis excluding periods of study-wide suspension of device use) over 13 weeks on CLC vs. 70.0 ± 13.6% and 60.4 ± 17.1% on PLGS (difference = 5.9%; 95% CI 3.6%, 8.3%; P < 0.001). Time >180 mg/dL was lower in the CLC group than PLGS group (difference = -6.0%; 95% CI -8.4%, -3.7%; P < 0.001) while time <54 mg/dL was similar (0.04%; 95% CI -0.05%, 0.13%; P = 0.41). HbA1c after 13 weeks was lower on CLC than PLGS (7.2% [55 mmol/mol] vs. 7.5% [56 mmol/mol], difference -0.34% [-3.7 mmol/mol]; 95% CI -0.57% [-6.2 mmol/mol], -0.11% [1.2 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS Following 6 months of CLC, switching to PLGS reduced TIR and increased HbA1c toward their pre-CLC values, while hypoglycemia remained similarly reduced with both CLC and PLGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue A Brown
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Carol J Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | | | - Eyal Dassau
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA.,Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Francis J Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Stacey M Anderson
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Camilla Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | - Vinaya Simha
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Marc D Breton
- Division of Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - John W Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kovatchev B, Anderson SM, Raghinaru D, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy C, Pinsker JE, Wadwa RP, Buckingham B, Doyle FJ, Brown SA, Church MM, Dadlani V, Dassau E, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Lam DW, Lum J, Beck RW. Erratum. Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobile Closed-Loop Control. Diabetes Care 2020;43:607-615. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:1366. [PMID: 32245747 PMCID: PMC7245358 DOI: 10.2337/dc20-er06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
15
|
Kovatchev B, Anderson SM, Raghinaru D, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy C, Pinsker JE, Wadwa RP, Buckingham B, Doyle FJ, Brown SA, Church MM, Dadlani V, Dassau E, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Lam DW, Lum J, Beck RW. Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobile Closed-Loop Control. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:607-615. [PMID: 31937608 PMCID: PMC7035585 DOI: 10.2337/dc19-1310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess the efficacy of inControl AP, a mobile closed-loop control (CLC) system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This protocol, NCT02985866, is a 3-month parallel-group, multicenter, randomized unblinded trial designed to compare mobile CLC with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Eligibility criteria were type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year, use of insulin pumps for at least 6 months, age ≥14 years, and baseline HbA1c <10.5% (91 mmol/mol). The study was designed to assess two coprimary outcomes: superiority of CLC over SAP in continuous glucose monitor (CGM)-measured time below 3.9 mmol/L and noninferiority in CGM-measured time above 10 mmol/L. RESULTS Between November 2017 and May 2018, 127 participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to CLC (n = 65) versus SAP (n = 62); 125 participants completed the study. CGM time below 3.9 mmol/L was 5.0% at baseline and 2.4% during follow-up in the CLC group vs. 4.7% and 4.0%, respectively, in the SAP group (mean difference -1.7% [95% CI -2.4, -1.0]; P < 0.0001 for superiority). CGM time above 10 mmol/L was 40% at baseline and 34% during follow-up in the CLC group vs. 43% and 39%, respectively, in the SAP group (mean difference -3.0% [95% CI -6.1, 0.1]; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority). One severe hypoglycemic event occurred in the CLC group, which was unrelated to the study device. CONCLUSIONS In meeting its coprimary end points, superiority of CLC over SAP in CGM-measured time below 3.9 mmol/L and noninferiority in CGM-measured time above 10 mmol/L, the study has demonstrated that mobile CLC is feasible and could offer certain usability advantages over embedded systems, provided the connectivity between system components is stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Kovatchev
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Stacey M Anderson
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Carol Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Francis J Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sue A Brown
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Vikash Dadlani
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eyal Dassau
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | - David W Lam
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - John Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Wadwa RP, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Anderson SM, Church MM, Dadlani V, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Lam DW, Kollman C, Beck RW. Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1707-1717. [PMID: 31618560 PMCID: PMC7076915 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1907863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 550] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Closed-loop systems that automate insulin delivery may improve glycemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS In this 6-month randomized, multicenter trial, patients with type 1 diabetes were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with a closed-loop system (closed-loop group) or a sensor-augmented pump (control group). The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the blood glucose level was within the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.9 to 10.0 mmol per liter), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS A total of 168 patients underwent randomization; 112 were assigned to the closed-loop group, and 56 were assigned to the control group. The age range of the patients was 14 to 71 years, and the glycated hemoglobin level ranged from 5.4 to 10.6%. All 168 patients completed the trial. The mean (±SD) percentage of time that the glucose level was within the target range increased in the closed-loop group from 61±17% at baseline to 71±12% during the 6 months and remained unchanged at 59±14% in the control group (mean adjusted difference, 11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 14; P<0.001). The results with regard to the main secondary outcomes (percentage of time that the glucose level was >180 mg per deciliter, mean glucose level, glycated hemoglobin level, and percentage of time that the glucose level was <70 mg per deciliter or <54 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter]) all met the prespecified hierarchical criterion for significance, favoring the closed-loop system. The mean difference (closed loop minus control) in the percentage of time that the blood glucose level was lower than 70 mg per deciliter was -0.88 percentage points (95% CI, -1.19 to -0.57; P<0.001). The mean adjusted difference in glycated hemoglobin level after 6 months was -0.33 percentage points (95% CI, -0.53 to -0.13; P = 0.001). In the closed-loop group, the median percentage of time that the system was in closed-loop mode was 90% over 6 months. No serious hypoglycemic events occurred in either group; one episode of diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in the closed-loop group. CONCLUSIONS In this 6-month trial involving patients with type 1 diabetes, the use of a closed-loop system was associated with a greater percentage of time spent in a target glycemic range than the use of a sensor-augmented insulin pump. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; iDCL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03563313.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue A Brown
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Boris P Kovatchev
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - John W Lum
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Lori M Laffel
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Carol J Levy
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Jordan E Pinsker
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Eyal Dassau
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Francis J Doyle
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Stacey M Anderson
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Mei Mei Church
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Vikash Dadlani
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Elvira Isganaitis
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - David W Lam
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Craig Kollman
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| | - Roy W Beck
- From the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology, Charlottesville (S.A.B., B.P.K., S.M.A.); the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (D.R., J.W.L., C.K., R.W.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford (B.A.B., L.E.), and the Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara (J.E.P., M.C.) - both in California; the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.C.K., V.D.); the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.L., E.I.), and the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge (E.D., F.J.D.) - both in Massachusetts; the Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (C.J.L., D.W.L.); and the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.P.W., G.P.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Anderson SM, Dassau E, Raghinaru D, Lum J, Brown SA, Pinsker JE, Church MM, Levy C, Lam D, Kudva YC, Buckingham B, Forlenza GP, Wadwa RP, Laffel L, Doyle FJ, DeVries JH, Renard E, Cobelli C, Boscari F, Del Favero S, Kovatchev BP. The International Diabetes Closed-Loop Study: Testing Artificial Pancreas Component Interoperability. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019; 21:73-80. [PMID: 30649925 PMCID: PMC6354594 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of artificial pancreas (AP) requires seamless interaction of device components, such as continuous glucose monitor (CGM), insulin pump, and control algorithm. Mobile AP configurations also include a smartphone as computational hub and gateway to cloud applications (e.g., remote monitoring and data review and analysis). This International Diabetes Closed-Loop study was designed to demonstrate and evaluate the operation of the inControl AP using different CGMs and pump modalities without changes to the user interface, user experience, and underlying controller. METHODS Forty-three patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were enrolled at 10 clinical centers (7 United States, 3 Europe) and 41 were included in the analyses (39% female, >95% non-Hispanic white, median T1D duration 16 years, median HbA1c 7.4%). Two CGMs and two insulin pumps were tested by different study participants/sites using the same system hub (a smartphone) during 2 weeks of in-home use. RESULTS The major difference between the system components was the stability of their wireless connections with the smartphone. The two sensors achieved similar rates of connectivity as measured by percentage time in closed loop (75% and 75%); however, the two pumps had markedly different closed-loop adherence (66% vs. 87%). When connected, all system configurations achieved similar glycemic outcomes on AP control (73% [mean] time in range: 70-180 mg/dL, and 1.7% [median] time <70 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS CGMs and insulin pumps can be interchangeable in the same Mobile AP system, as long as these devices achieve certain levels of reliability and wireless connection stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey M. Anderson
- Center for Diabetes Technology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia
- Address correspondence to: Stacey M. Anderson, MD, Center for Diabetes Technology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, PO Box 400888, Charlottesville, VA 22903
| | - Eyal Dassau
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - John Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sue A. Brown
- Center for Diabetes Technology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia
| | | | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Carol Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York
| | - David Lam
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lori Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Francis J. Doyle
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - J. Hans DeVries
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
- INSERM 1411 Clinical Investigation Center, Institute of Functional Genomics, UMR CNRS 5203/INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Claudio Cobelli
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Simone Del Favero
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Boris P. Kovatchev
- Center for Diabetes Technology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown S, Raghinaru D, Emory E, Kovatchev B. First Look at Control-IQ: A New-Generation Automated Insulin Delivery System. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:2634-2636. [PMID: 30305346 PMCID: PMC6245207 DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To pilot test a new closed-loop control technology to validate it for a further large clinical trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ Technology (Tandem Diabetes Care) includes a Dexcom G6 sensor and a closed-loop algorithm implemented in the pump that 1) automates insulin correction boluses, 2) has a dedicated hypoglycemia safety system, and 3) gradually intensifies control overnight, aiming for blood glucose levels of approximately 100-120 mg/dL every morning. RESULTS Five patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 52.8 years, 2/3 male/female, mean A1C 6.5%) used Control-IQ in an outpatient setting (hotel) for approximately 37 h. During the closed loop, mean glucose was 129 mg/dL (135/121 mg/dL during the day/night), time within target range 70-180 mg/dL was 87% (82%/94% during the day/night), and time <60 mg/dL was 1.1% (2.0%/0.0% during the day/night). CONCLUSIONS Following this pilot trial, Control-IQ was deployed in several studies, including the large-scale National Institutes of Health International Diabetes Closed-Loop (iDCL) Trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Brown
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.,Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Emma Emory
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Boris Kovatchev
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Forlenza GP, Raghinaru D, Cameron F, Bequette BW, Chase HP, Wadwa RP, Maahs DM, Jost E, Ly TT, Wilson DM, Norlander L, Ekhlaspour L, Min H, Clinton P, Njeru N, Lum JW, Kollman C, Beck RW, Buckingham BA. Predictive hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia minimization: In-home double-blind randomized controlled evaluation in children and young adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2018; 19:420-428. [PMID: 29159870 PMCID: PMC5951790 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a predictive hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia minimization (PHHM) system vs predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) alone in optimizing overnight glucose control in children 6 to 14 years old. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Twenty-eight participants 6 to 14 years old with T1D duration ≥1 year with daily insulin therapy ≥12 months and on insulin pump therapy for ≥6 months were randomized per night into PHHM mode or PLGS-only mode for 42 nights. The primary outcome was percentage of time in sensor-measured range 70 to 180 mg/dL in the overnight period. RESULTS The addition of automated insulin delivery with PHHM increased time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) from 66 ± 11% during PLGS nights to 76 ± 9% during PHHM nights (P<.001), without increasing hypoglycemia as measured by time below various thresholds. Average morning blood glucose improved from 176 ± 28 mg/dL following PLGS nights to 154 ± 19 mg/dL following PHHM nights (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS The PHHM system was effective in optimizing overnight glycemic control, significantly increasing time in range, lowering mean glucose, and decreasing glycemic variability compared to PLGS alone in children 6 to 14 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P Forlenza
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Faye Cameron
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York
| | | | - H Peter Chase
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | - David M Maahs
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado,Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Emily Jost
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | - Trang T Ly
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Darrell M Wilson
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Lisa Norlander
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Hyojin Min
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Paula Clinton
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Nelly Njeru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | - John W Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wadwa RP, Chase HP, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Hramiak I, Maahs DM, Messer L, Ly T, Aye T, Clinton P, Kollman C, Beck RW, Lum J. Ketone production in children with type 1 diabetes, ages 4-14 years, with and without nocturnal insulin pump suspension. Pediatr Diabetes 2017; 18:422-427. [PMID: 27402452 PMCID: PMC5233607 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Revised: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the frequency of elevated morning blood ketone levels according to age in 4-14 year olds with type 1 diabetes following overnight use of an automated low glucose insulin suspension system, or following control nights when the system was not used. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS For 28 children ages 4-9 years and 54 youth ages 10-14 years, elevation of morning blood ketone levels was assessed using the Precision Xtra Ketone meter following 1155 and 2345 nights, respectively. Repeated measures logistic regression models were used to compare age groups for blood ketone level elevation following control nights (system not activated) and following intervention nights with and without insulin suspension. RESULTS Elevated morning blood ketones (≥0.6 mmol/L) were present following 10% of 580 control nights in the 4-9 year olds compared with 2% of 1162 control nights in 10-14 year olds (P < 0.001). Likewise, the frequency was greater following intervention nights in the younger age group (13% of 575 nights vs 2% of 1183 nights, P < 0.001). A longer duration of pump suspension resulted in a higher percentage of mornings with elevated blood ketones in the younger age group (P = 0.002), but not in the older age group (P = 0.63). The presence of elevated morning ketone levels did not progress to ketoacidosis in any subject. CONCLUSIONS Elevated morning blood ketones are more common in younger children with type 1 diabetes with or without nocturnal insulin suspension. Care providers need to be aware of the differences in ketogenesis in younger age children relative to various clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - H Peter Chase
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Irene Hramiak
- Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada
| | - David M Maahs
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Laurel Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Trang Ly
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Tandy Aye
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Paula Clinton
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Spaic T, Driscoll M, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Wilson DM, Clinton P, Chase HP, Maahs DM, Forlenza GP, Jost E, Hramiak I, Paul T, Bequette BW, Cameron F, Beck RW, Kollman C, Lum JW, Ly TT. Predictive Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia Minimization: In-Home Evaluation of Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy in Overnight Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:359-366. [PMID: 28100606 PMCID: PMC5319476 DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a predictive hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia minimization (PHHM) system compared with predictive low-glucose insulin suspension (PLGS) alone in overnight glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A 42-night trial was conducted in 30 individuals with type 1 diabetes in the age range 15-45 years. Participants were randomly assigned each night to either PHHM or PLGS and were blinded to the assignment. The system suspended the insulin pump on both the PHHM and PLGS nights for predicted hypoglycemia but delivered correction boluses for predicted hyperglycemia on PHHM nights only. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in a sensor glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL during the overnight period. RESULTS The addition of automated insulin delivery with PHHM increased the time spent in the target range (70-180 mg/dL) from 71 ± 10% during PLGS nights to 78 ± 10% during PHHM nights (P < 0.001). The average morning blood glucose concentration improved from 163 ± 23 mg/dL after PLGS nights to 142 ± 18 mg/dL after PHHM nights (P < 0.001). Various sensor-measured hypoglycemic outcomes were similar on PLGS and PHHM nights. All participants completed 42 nights with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, or other study- or device-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The addition of a predictive hyperglycemia minimization component to our existing PLGS system was shown to be safe, feasible, and effective in overnight glucose control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Spaic
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Darrell M Wilson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Paula Clinton
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - H Peter Chase
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - David M Maahs
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Emily Jost
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Irene Hramiak
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terri Paul
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | - John W Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | - Trang T Ly
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Anderson SM, Raghinaru D, Pinsker JE, Boscari F, Renard E, Buckingham BA, Nimri R, Doyle FJ, Brown SA, Keith-Hynes P, Breton MD, Chernavvsky D, Bevier WC, Bradley PK, Bruttomesso D, Del Favero S, Calore R, Cobelli C, Avogaro A, Farret A, Place J, Ly TT, Shanmugham S, Phillip M, Dassau E, Dasanayake IS, Kollman C, Lum JW, Beck RW, Kovatchev B. Multinational Home Use of Closed-Loop Control Is Safe and Effective. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:1143-50. [PMID: 27208316 PMCID: PMC5876016 DOI: 10.2337/dc15-2468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of a portable, wearable, wireless artificial pancreas system (the Diabetes Assistant [DiAs] running the Unified Safety System) on glucose control at home in overnight-only and 24/7 closed-loop control (CLC) modes in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS At six clinical centers in four countries, 30 participants 18-66 years old with type 1 diabetes (43% female, 96% non-Hispanic white, median type 1 diabetes duration 19 years, median A1C 7.3%) completed the study. The protocol included a 2-week baseline sensor-augmented pump (SAP) period followed by 2 weeks of overnight-only CLC and 2 weeks of 24/7 CLC at home. Glucose control during CLC was compared with the baseline SAP. RESULTS Glycemic control parameters for overnight-only CLC were improved during the nighttime period compared with baseline for hypoglycemia (time <70 mg/dL, primary end point median 1.1% vs. 3.0%; P < 0.001), time in target (70-180 mg/dL: 75% vs. 61%; P < 0.001), and glucose variability (coefficient of variation: 30% vs. 36%; P < 0.001). Similar improvements for day/night combined were observed with 24/7 CLC compared with baseline: 1.7% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001; 73% vs. 65%, P < 0.001; and 34% vs. 38%, P < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CLC running on a smartphone (DiAs) in the home environment was safe and effective. Overnight-only CLC reduced hypoglycemia and increased time in range overnight and increased time in range during the day; 24/7 CLC reduced hypoglycemia and increased time in range both overnight and during the day. Compared with overnight-only CLC, 24/7 CLC provided additional hypoglycemia protection during the day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Eric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition and INSERM 1411 Clinical Investigation Center, Montpellier University Hospital, and UMR CNRS 5203/INSERM U1191, Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Revital Nimri
- Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Francis J Doyle
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Patrick Keith-Hynes
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA TypeZero Technologies, LLC, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Farret
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition and INSERM 1411 Clinical Investigation Center, Montpellier University Hospital, and UMR CNRS 5203/INSERM U1191, Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jerome Place
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition and INSERM 1411 Clinical Investigation Center, Montpellier University Hospital, and UMR CNRS 5203/INSERM U1191, Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Trang T Ly
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Satya Shanmugham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Moshe Phillip
- Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Eyal Dassau
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | - Isuru S Dasanayake
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
| | | | - John W Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Buckingham BA, Raghinaru D, Cameron F, Bequette BW, Chase HP, Maahs DM, Slover R, Wadwa RP, Wilson DM, Ly T, Aye T, Hramiak I, Clarson C, Stein R, Gallego PH, Lum J, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Beck RW. Erratum. Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1197-1204. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:1813. [PMID: 26294776 PMCID: PMC5321240 DOI: 10.2337/dc15-er09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
24
|
Buckingham BA, Raghinaru D, Cameron F, Bequette BW, Chase HP, Maahs DM, Slover R, Wadwa RP, Wilson DM, Ly T, Aye T, Hramiak I, Clarson C, Stein R, Gallego PH, Lum J, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Beck RW. Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:1197-204. [PMID: 26049549 PMCID: PMC4477332 DOI: 10.2337/dc14-3053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 03/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nocturnal hypoglycemia can cause seizures and is a major impediment to tight glycemic control, especially in young children with type 1 diabetes. We conducted an in-home randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a continuous glucose monitor-based overnight predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In two age-groups of children with type 1 diabetes (11-14 and 4-10 years of age), a 42-night trial for each child was conducted wherein each night was assigned randomly to either having the PLGS system active (intervention night) or inactive (control night). The primary outcome was percent time <70 mg/dL overnight. RESULTS Median time at <70 mg/dL was reduced by 54% from 10.1% on control nights to 4.6% on intervention nights (P < 0.001) in 11-14-year-olds (n = 45) and by 50% from 6.2% to 3.1% (P < 0.001) in 4-10-year-olds (n = 36). Mean overnight glucose was lower on control versus intervention nights in both age-groups (144 ± 18 vs. 152 ± 19 mg/dL [P < 0.001] and 153 ± 14 vs. 160 ± 16 mg/dL [P = 0.004], respectively). Mean morning blood glucose was 159 ± 29 vs. 176 ± 28 mg/dL (P < 0.001) in the 11-14-year-olds and 154 ± 25 vs. 158 ± 22 mg/dL (P = 0.11) in the 4-10-year-olds, respectively. No differences were found between intervention and control in either age-group in morning blood ketosis. CONCLUSIONS In 4-14-year-olds, use of a nocturnal PLGS system can substantially reduce overnight hypoglycemia without an increase in morning ketosis, although overnight mean glucose is slightly higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - H Peter Chase
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - David M Maahs
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Robert Slover
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Trang Ly
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Cheril Clarson
- Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Stein
- Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - John Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sugar A, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, Croasdale CR, Feder RS, Holland EJ, Lass JH, Macy JI, Mannis MJ, Smith PW, Soukiasian SH, Beck RW. Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133:246-54. [PMID: 25322173 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The Cornea Donor Study (CDS) showed that donor age is not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease. Secondary analyses confirm the importance of surgical indication and presence of glaucoma in outcomes at 10 years. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between donor and recipient factors and corneal graft survival in the CDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter prospective, double-masked, controlled clinical trial conducted at 80 clinical sites. One hundred five surgeons enrolled 1090 participants undergoing corneal transplant for a moderate-risk condition, principally Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE). Forty-three eye banks provided corneas. INTERVENTIONS Corneas from donors younger than 66 years and donors 66 years or older were assigned, masked to donor age. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. Participants were followed up for as long as 12 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Graft failure, defined as a regrafting procedure or a cloudy cornea for 3 consecutive months. RESULTS The 10-year cumulative probability of graft failure was higher in participants with PACE than in those with Fuchs dystrophy (37% vs 20%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1 [99% CI, 1.4-3.0]; P < .001) and in participants with a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glaucoma surgery (58% with prior glaucoma surgery and use of medications to lower intraocular pressure at the time of surgery vs 22% with no history of glaucoma surgery or medication use; HR, 4.1 [99% CI, 2.2-7.5]; P < .001). We found trends toward increased graft failure in recipients who were 70 years or older compared with those younger than 60 years (29% vs 19%; HR, 1.2 [99% CI, 0.7-2.1]; P = .04) or were African American (HR, 1.5; P = .11) or who had a history of smoking (35% vs 24%; HR, 1.6 [99% CI, 0.9-2.8]; P = .02). Lower endothelial cell density (ECD) and higher corneal thickness (CT) at 6 months (6% vs 41% for ECD ≥2700 vs <1700 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 14% vs 36% for CT <500 vs ≥600 μm [P = .001]), 1 year (4% vs 39% for ECD ≥2700 vs <1700 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 18% vs 28% for CT <500 vs ≥600 μm [P = .04]), and 5 years (2% vs 29% for ECD ≥1500 vs <500 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 7% vs 34% for CT <550 vs ≥650 μm [P < .001]) were associated with subsequent graft failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Most penetrating corneal grafts for Fuchs dystrophy or PACE remain clear at 10 years. The risk for failure is greater for graft recipients with PACE and those with a history of glaucoma. Measurements of ECD and CT during the course of postkeratoplasty follow-up are associated with a risk for failure. However, even with very low ECD and high CT at 5 years, most corneas remain clear at 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Sugar
- W. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Robin L Gal
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert S Feder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward J Holland
- Cincinnati Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jonathan H Lass
- University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Mark J Mannis
- Eye Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento
| | | | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM, Raghinaru D, Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Peters AL, Bode BW, Aleppo G, Hirsch IB, Kleis L, Chase HP, DuBose SN, Miller KM, Beck RW, Adi S. Response to comment on Wong et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2702-2709. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:e61. [PMID: 25805875 DOI: 10.2337/dc14-2782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jenise C Wong
- Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - David M Maahs
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Andrew J Ahmann
- Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Anne L Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Lora Kleis
- Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - H Peter Chase
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | - Saleh Adi
- Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blackman SM, Raghinaru D, Adi S, Simmons JH, Ebner-Lyon L, Chase HP, Tamborlane WV, Schatz DA, Block JM, Litton JC, Raman V, Foster NC, Kollman CR, DuBose SN, Miller KM, Beck RW, DiMeglio LA. Insulin pump use in young children in the T1D Exchange clinic registry is associated with lower hemoglobin A1c levels than injection therapy. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15:564-72. [PMID: 24494980 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2013] [Revised: 12/20/2013] [Accepted: 01/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Insulin delivery via injection and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via insulin pump were compared in a cross-sectional study (n = 669) and retrospective longitudinal study (n = 1904) of young children (<6 yr) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) participating in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Use of CSII correlated with longer T1D duration (p < 0.001), higher parental education (p < 0.001), and annual household income (p < 0.006) but not with race/ethnicity. Wide variation in pump use was observed among T1D Exchange centers even after adjusting for these factors, suggesting that prescriber preference is a substantial determinant of CSII use. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was lower in pump vs. injection users (7.9 vs. 8.5%, adjusted p < 0.001) in the cross-sectional study. In the longitudinal study, HbA1c decreased after initiation of CSII by 0.2%, on average (p < 0.001). Frequency of a severe hypoglycemia (SH) event did not differ in pump vs. injection users (p = 0.2). Frequency of ≥1 parent-reported diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) event in the prior year was greater in pump users than injection users (10 vs. 8%, p = 0.04). No differences between pump and injection users were observed for clinic-reported DKA events. Children below 6 yr have many unique metabolic characteristics, feeding behaviors, and care needs compared with older children and adolescents. These data support the use of insulin pumps in this youngest age group, and suggest that metabolic control may be improved without increasing the frequency of SH, but care should be taken as to the possibly increased risk of DKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Blackman
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM, Raghinaru D, Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Peters AL, Bode BW, Aleppo G, Hirsch IB, Kleis L, Chase HP, DuBose SN, Miller KM, Beck RW, Adi S. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:2702-9. [PMID: 25011947 PMCID: PMC4392936 DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the frequency of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device use, factors associated with its use, and the relationship of CGM with diabetes outcomes (HbA1c, severe hypoglycemia [SH], and diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Survey questions related to CGM device use 1 year after enrollment in the T1D Exchange clinic registry were completed by 17,317 participants. Participants were defined as CGM users if they indicated using real-time CGM during the prior 30 days. RESULTS Nine percent of participants used CGM (6% of children <13 years old, 4% of adolescents 13 to <18 years, 6% of young adults 18 to <26 years, and 21% of adults ≥26 years). CGM use was more likely with higher education, higher household income, private health insurance, longer duration of diabetes, and use of insulin pump (P < 0.01 all factors). CGM use was associated with lower HbA1c in children (8.3% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001) and adults (7.7% vs. 7.9%, P < 0.001). In adults, more frequent use of CGM (≥6 days/week) was associated with lower mean HbA1c. Only 27% of users downloaded data from their device at least once per month, and ≤15% of users reported downloading their device at least weekly. Among participants who used CGM at baseline, 41% had discontinued within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS CGM use is uncommon but associated with lower HbA1c in some age-groups, especially when used more frequently. Factors associated with discontinuation and infrequent use of retrospective analysis of CGM data should be considered in developing next-generation devices and education on CGM use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenise C Wong
- Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - David M Maahs
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Andrew J Ahmann
- Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Anne L Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Lora Kleis
- Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - H Peter Chase
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | - Saleh Adi
- Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Maturi RK, Chen V, Raghinaru D, Bleau L, Stewart MW. A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8:1057-64. [PMID: 24940042 PMCID: PMC4051812 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s60159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. Methods Thirty eyes were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy or bevacizumab monotherapy. All patients received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline, followed by dexamethasone implants or sham injections 1 week later. Monthly bevacizumab injections were given if the central subfield thickness (CST) was >250 μm, and the combined group received a second implant at month 4 or 5 if CST was >250 μm. Results At 6 months, several secondary endpoints were met. Patients receiving combined therapy required fewer bevacizumab reinjections compared to those receiving monotherapy (two versus three; P=0.02), experienced greater mean reductions in CST from randomization (−56 μm versus +45 μm; P=0.01), and were more likely to have resolved all edema (CST <250 μm) (7/11 versus 2/14; P=0.02). The primary endpoint was not met since mean visual acuity changes from baseline were similar in the two groups (P=0.75). Conclusion In patients with macular edema due to vein occlusions, bevacizumab with dexamethasone implants produces greater improvements in macular thickness compared to bevacizumab monotherapy, despite fewer bevacizumab injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj K Maturi
- Midwest Eye Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA ; Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Gal RL, Dontchev M, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dunn SP, Schultze RL, Verdier DD, Lass JH, Raber IM, Sugar J, Gorovoy MS, Sugar A, Stulting RD, Montoya MM, Penta JG, Benetz BA, Beck RW. The effect of donor age on penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease: graft survival after 10 years in the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology 2014; 120:2419-2427. [PMID: 24246825 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2013] [Revised: 08/18/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the 10-year success rate of penetrating keratoplasty for corneal endothelial disorders is associated with donor age. DESIGN Multicenter, prospective, double-masked clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1090 participants undergoing penetrating keratoplasty at 80 sites for Fuchs' dystrophy (62%), pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema (34%), or another corneal endothelial disorder (4%) and followed for up to 12 years. METHODS Forty-three eye banks provided corneas from donors aged 12 to 75 years, using a randomized approach to assign donor corneas to study participants without respect to recipient factors. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Graft failure defined as a regraft or, in the absence of a regraft, a cloudy cornea that was sufficiently opaque to compromise vision for 3 consecutive months. RESULTS In the primary analysis, the 10-year success rate was 77% for 707 corneas from donors aged 12 to 65 years compared with 71% for 383 donors aged 66 to 75 years (difference, +6%; 95% confidence interval, -1 to +12; P = 0.11). When analyzed as a continuous variable, higher donor age was associated with lower graft success beyond the first 5 years (P<0.001). Exploring this association further, we observed that the 10-year success rate was relatively constant for donors aged 34 to 71 years (75%). The success rate was higher for 80 donors aged 12 to 33 years (96%) and lower for 130 donors aged 72 to 75 years (62%). The relative decrease in the success rate with donor ages 72 to 75 years was not observed until after year 6. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary analysis did not show a significant difference in 10-year success rates comparing donor ages 12 to 65 years and 66 to 75 years, there was evidence of a donor age effect at the extremes of the age range. Because we observed a fairly constant 10-year success rate for donors aged 34 to 71 years, which account for approximately 75% of corneas in the United States available for transplant, the Cornea Donor Study results indicate that donor age is not an important factor in most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark J Mannis
- University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
| | - Edward J Holland
- Cincinnati Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Robin L Gal
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | - Steven P Dunn
- Michigan Cornea Consultants, P.C., Southfield, Michigan
| | | | | | - Jonathan H Lass
- Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Irving M Raber
- Ophthalmic Partners of Pennsylvania, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania
| | - Joel Sugar
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Alan Sugar
- W. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - R Doyle Stulting
- Emory University (now at Woolfson Eye Institute), Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Beth Ann Benetz
- Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lass JH, Benetz BA, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Chow C, McCoy K, Price FW, Sugar A, Verdier DD, Beck RW. Donor age and factors related to endothelial cell loss 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty: Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study. Ophthalmology 2014; 120:2428-2435. [PMID: 24246826 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2013] [Revised: 08/30/2013] [Accepted: 08/30/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of donor age and other perioperative factors on long-term endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). DESIGN Multicenter, prospective, double-masked clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS We included 176 participants from the Cornea Donor Study cohort who had not experienced graft failure ≥ 10 years after PKP for a moderate risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema). METHODS Corneas from donors 12 to 75 years old were assigned to participants using a randomized approach, without respect to recipient factors. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. Images of the central endothelium were obtained preoperatively and at intervals for 10 years postoperatively. Images were analyzed by a central image analysis reading center to determine endothelial cell density (ECD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Endothelial cell density at 10 years. RESULTS Among study participants with a clear graft at 10 years, the 125 who received a cornea from a donor 12 to 65 years old experienced a median cell loss of 76%, resulting in a 10-year median ECD of 628 cells/mm(2) (interquartile range [IQR], 522-850 cells/mm(2)), whereas the 51 who received a cornea from a donor 66 to 75 years old experienced a cell loss of 79%, resulting in a median 10-year ECD of 550 cells/mm(2) (IQR, 483-694 cells/mm(2); P adjusted for baseline ECD = 0.03). In addition to younger donor age, higher ECD values were significantly associated with higher baseline ECD (P<0.001) and larger donor tissue size (P<0.001). Forty-two of the 176 participants (24%) had an ECD of <500 cells/mm(2) at 10 years and only 24 (14%) had an ECD of >1000 cells/mm(2). CONCLUSIONS Substantial cell loss occurs in eyes with a clear graft 10 years after PKP, with the rate of cell loss being slightly greater with older donor age. Greater preoperative ECD and larger donor tissue size are associated with higher ECD at 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Lass
- Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Beth Ann Benetz
- Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robin L Gal
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | - Mark J Mannis
- University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Edward J Holland
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Alan Sugar
- W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Beck RW, Raghinaru D, Wadwa RP, Chase HP, Maahs DM, Buckingham BA. Frequency of morning ketosis after overnight insulin suspension using an automated nocturnal predictive low glucose suspend system. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:1224-9. [PMID: 24757229 PMCID: PMC3994933 DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of overnight insulin pump suspension in an automated predictive low glucose suspend system on morning blood glucose and ketone levels in an attempt to determine whether routine measurement of ketone levels is useful when a closed-loop system that suspends insulin delivery overnight is being used. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data from an in-home randomized trial of 45 individuals with type 1 diabetes (age range 15-45 years) were analyzed, evaluating an automated predictive low glucose pump suspension system in which blood glucose, blood ketone, and urine ketone levels were measured on 1,954 mornings. RESULTS One or more pump suspensions occurred during 744 of the 977 intervention nights (76%). The morning blood ketone level was ≥0.6 mmol/L after 11 of the 744 nights (1.5%) during which a pump suspension occurred and 2 of the 233 nights (0.9%) during which there was no suspension compared with 11 of 977 control nights (1.1%). The morning blood ketone level was ≥0.6 mmol/L after only 2 of 159 nights (1.3%) with a pump suspension exceeding 2 h. Morning fasting blood glucose level was not a good predictor of the presence of blood ketones. CONCLUSIONS Routine measurement of blood or urine ketones during use of an automated pump suspension system using continuous glucose monitoring, whether threshold based or predictive, is not necessary. Recommendations for checking ketone levels should be no different when a patient is using a system with automated insulin suspension than it is for conventional diabetes self-management.
Collapse
|
33
|
Scali ST, Chang CK, Raghinaru D, Daniels MJ, Beck AW, Feezor RJ, Berceli SA, Huber TS. Prediction of graft patency and mortality after distal revascularization and interval ligation for hemodialysis access-related hand ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2012; 57:451-8. [PMID: 23244784 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2012] [Revised: 08/17/2012] [Accepted: 08/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The treatment goals of access-related hand ischemia (ARHI) are to reverse symptoms and salvage the access. Many procedures have been described, but the optimal treatment strategy remains unresolved. In an effort to guide clinical decision making, this study was undertaken to document our outcomes for distal revascularization and interval ligation (DRIL) and to identify predictors of bypass patency and patient mortality. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent DRIL at the University of Florida from 2002 to 2011. Diagnosis of ARHI was based primarily upon clinical symptoms with noninvasive studies used to corroborate in equivocal cases. Patient demographics, procedure-outcome variables, and reinterventions were recorded. Bypass patency and mortality were estimated using cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier methodology, respectively. Cumulative incidence and Cox regression analysis were performed to determine predictors of bypass patency and mortality, respectively. RESULTS A total of 134 DRILs were performed in 126 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 57 [12] years) following brachial artery-based access. The postoperative complication rate was 27% (19% wound), and 30-day mortality was 2%. The wrist-brachial index and digital brachial index increased 0.31 (0.25) and 0.25 (0.29), respectively. Symptoms resolved in 82% of patients, and 85% continued to use their access. Cumulative incidences (± standard error of the mean) of loss of primary and primary-assisted patency rates were 5% ± 2% and 4% ± 2% at 1 year and 22% ± 5% and 18% ± 5% at 5 years, respectively, with mean follow-up of 14.8 months. Univariate predictors of primary patency failure were DRIL complications (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-8.9; P = .02), configuration other than brachiobasilic/brachiocephalic autogenous access (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.3; P = .009), and two or more prior access attempts (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.6-10.4; P = .004). Brachiocephalic access configuration (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04-0.8; P = .02) and autogenous vein conduit (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.06-0.58; P = .004) were predictors of improved bypass patency. All-cause mortality was 28% and 79% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Multivariable predictors of mortality were age >40 (hazard ratio [HR], 8.3; 95% CI, 2.5-33.3; P = .0004), grade 3 ischemia (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.6; P = .0008), complication from DRIL (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.5; P = .004), and smoking history (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-4; P = .007). Patients with no prior access attempts had lower predicted mortality (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS The DRIL procedure effectively improves distal perfusion and reverses the symptoms of ARHI while salvaging the access, but the long-term survival of these patients is poor. Given the poor survival, preoperative risk stratification is critical. Patients at high risk for DRIL failure and mortality may be best served with alternate remedial procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore T Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0128, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|