Capivasertib: A Novel AKT Inhibitor Approved for Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER-2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of capivasertib for the treatment of adults with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with 1 or more PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE databases, published abstracts, and studies from ClinicalTrials.gov between 2003 and February 2024. Keywords included capivasertib, AZD5363, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, and breast cancer.

DATA EXTRACTION

All applicable publications, package inserts, meeting abstracts, and clinical trials with capivasertib were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Capivasertib is a first-in-class inhibitor of 3 isoforms of AKT (AKT-1, AKT-2, and AKT-3) which is an essential component in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway involved in oncogenesis. In the phase III CAPItello-291 trial, capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant (C+F) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) (7.3 vs 3.1 months) compared with placebo-fulvestrant (P+F) cohort in AKT-altered pathway patients who had progressed through prior aromatase inhibitor. The most common adverse reactions of any grade reported in the C+F group were diarrhea, cutaneous skin reactions, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS

HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients experience progression following endocrine therapies and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors. Capivasertib is a viable treatment option for patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN activating mutations following progression on endocrine-based regimens in the metastatic setting or recurrence within 12 months of completing adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Integration of capivasertib into clinical practice is ongoing; intermittent dosing and favorable toxicity are attractive for future novel combination prospective trials.

Unraveling Racial Disparities in Supportive Care Medication Use among End-of-Life Pancreatic Cancer Patients: Focus on Pain Management and Psychiatric Therapies

BACKGROUND

Supportive care medication use differences may contribute to racial disparities observed in health-related quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In this observation study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database, we sought to examine supportive care medication use disparities in patients with pancreatic cancer from 2005 to 2017 by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Among 74,309 patients included in the final analysis, racial and ethnic disparities in the use of supportive care medications were identified. After adjustment for confounding factors and compared with non-Hispanic Whites, minorities had significantly less use of opioids [Black: adjusted OR (aOR), 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.88; Asian: aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90), and skeletomuscular relaxants (Black: aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; Hispanic: aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91; Asian: aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.68), and increased use of non-opioid analgesics (Hispanic: aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; Asian: aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26-1.49). Racial and ethnic minorities had less use of antidepressants (Black: aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.53-0.59; Hispanic: aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.82; Asian: aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51), anxiolytics (Black: aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82; Hispanic: aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71; Asian: aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.57), and antipsychotics (Hispanic: aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; Asian: aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of supportive care medications among patients with pancreatic cancer were observed, with the differences unexplained by sociodemographic factors.

IMPACT

Future studies should identify strategies to promote equitable use of supportive care medications among racial minorities and explore factors that may influence their use in these populations.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant liposomal irinotecan with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

For patients with localized pancreatic cancer with minimal vascular involvement, optimal survivability requires a multidisciplinary approach of surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a combination chemotherapy regimen that offers promising results in the perioperative and metastatic settings; however, it can cause significant adverse effects. Such toxicity can negatively impact some patients, resulting in chemotherapy discontinuation or surgical unsuitability. In an effort to reduce toxicities and optimize outcomes, this investigation explores the safety and feasibility of substituting liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) for nonliposomal irinotecan to improve tumor drug delivery and potentially reduce toxicity. This regimen, NALIRIFOX, has the potential to be both safer and more effective when administered in the preoperative setting.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Surveillance Evaluation of Patients Treated With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy

Background Anthracyclines remain a key treatment for many malignancies but can increase the risk of heart failure or cardiomyopathy. Specific guidelines recommend echocardiography and serum cardiac biomarkers such as BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) or NT-proBNP (N-terminal proBNP) evaluation before and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Our objective was to evaluate associations between racial and ethnic groups in cardiac surveillance of survivors of cancer after exposure to anthracyclines. Methods and Results Adult patients in the OneFlorida Consortium without prior cardiovascular disease who received at least 2 cycles of anthracyclines were included in the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for receiving cardiac surveillance at baseline before anthracycline therapy, 6 months after, and 12 months after anthracycline exposure among different racial and ethnic groups. Among the entire cohort of 5430 patients, 63.4% had a baseline echocardiogram, with 22.3% receiving an echocardiogram at 6 months and 25% at 12 months. Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients had a lower likelihood of receiving a baseline echocardiogram than Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.88]; P=0.0006) or any baseline cardiac surveillance (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.89]; P=0.001). Compared with NHW patients, Hispanic patients received significantly less cardiac surveillance at the 6-month (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]; P=0.03) and 12-month (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74-0.98]; P=0.03) time points, respectively. Conclusions There were significant racial and ethnic differences in cardiac surveillance among survivors of cancer at baseline and following anthracycline-based treatment in NHB and Hispanic cohorts. Health care providers need to be cognizant of these social inequities and initiate efforts to ensure recommended cardiac surveillance occurs following anthracyclines.

Review of genetic and pharmacogenetic differences in cytotoxic and targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer in African Americans

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the third leading cause of cancer mortality and the incidence is projected to increase by 2030. Despite recent advances in its treatment, African Americans have a 50-60% higher incidence and 30% higher mortality rate when compared to European Americans possibly resulting from differences in socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and genetics. Genetics plays a role in cancer predisposition, response to cancer therapeutics (pharmacogenetics), and in tumor behavior, making some genes targets for oncologic therapeutics. We hypothesize that the germline genetic differences in predisposition, drug response, and targeted therapies also impact PDAC disparities. To demonstrate the impact of genetics and pharmacogenetics on PDAC disparities, a review of the literature was performed using PubMed with variations of the following keywords: pharmacogenetics, pancreatic cancer, race, ethnicity, African, Black, toxicity, and the FDA-approved drug names: Fluoropyrimidines, Topoisomerase inhibitors, Gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel, Platinum agents, Pembrolizumab, PARP-inhibitors, and NTRK fusion inhibitors. Our findings suggest that the genetic profiles of African Americans may contribute to disparities related to FDA approved chemotherapeutic response for patients with PDAC. We recommend a strong focus on improving genetic testing and participation in biobank sample donations for African Americans. In this way, we can improve our current understanding of genes that influence drug response for patients with PDAC.

A phase Ib/II study of atezolizumab plus tivozanib in pancreatic, gallbladder, and bile duct malignancies

TPS625

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy represents a significant advance in cancer care however it is not an effective intervention in the treatment of several immunologically cold tumors including pancreatic, gallbladder, and bile duct malignancies where ICIs have produced objective response rates of 0-6%. VEGF is thought to play a key role in modulating the anti-tumor immune response as it is secreted by tumors and leads to endothelial cell proliferation, vascular permeability, and vasodilation. This in turn leads to the development of an abnormal vasculature with excessive permeability and poor blood flow, thus limiting immune surveillance. In addition, VEGF inhibits dendritic cell differentiation, limiting the presentation of tumor antigens to CD4 and CD8 T cells. Through the inhibition of VEGF, it may be possible to potentiate the effect of ICIs. Combined use of a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and ICI is already approved for advanced kidney and endometrial cancer. Methods: This is a single institution, single arm, open-label phase Ib/II study with the co-primary endpoints of safety and efficacy of the combination of the VEGFR-TKI tivozanib and the ICI atezolizumab. Eligible patients are those with metastatic cancer progressing on at least one line of therapy of the following organs: pancreatic, gallbladder, bile duct, well-differentiated grade 2 and 3 neuroendocrine tumors, ovarian, vulvar, soft tissue sarcoma, castrate resistant prostate, and HER2 positive hormone receptor negative breast. Key exclusion criteria will include patients with known mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, or high tumor mutational burden. The phase Ib portion will assess the safety profile of the combination of tivozanib and atezolizumab with a potential dose de-escalation of tivozanib using a 3+3 study design. Three patients will be treated with tivozanib 1.34 mg per day (dose level 0) for 21 days of each 28-day cycle and atezolizumab 1680 mg on day 1 of every 28-day cycle. If one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is found then 3 more patients will be enrolled at dose level 0. If >1 DLT occurs in the first 3 patients or >1 DLT in the first 6, another 3+3 study will begin at dose level -1 (0.89 mg of tivozanib). If 1 DLT occurs in these 3 patients at dose level -1 then another 3 will be enrolled at this dose. The study will be stopped for toxicity if there is >1 DLT in the first 3 patients at dose level -1 or if there are >1 DLT in the 6 patients at dose level -1. A subsequent protocol amendment was made to reduce tivozanib dose level 0 to 0.89 mg per day and dose level -1 to 0.89 mg every other day. The phase II portion will enroll up to 26 patients using the dose of tivozanib found to be safe in the Ib portion. Disease response assessment every 12 weeks with CT Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis via RECIST 1.1. Treatment will continue until progression or intolerance. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05000294 .

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NEO-Nal-IRI Study)

TPS778

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given neoadjuvantly. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multidisciplinary GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NEO-N-IRI regimen as per Table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in perioperative setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30-day postoperative complication rate. Microbiota specimens will be collected for exploratory analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038 . [Table: see text]

A Scoping Review on the Relationship between Race/Ethnicity and the Receipt of Supportive Care Medications during Cancer Treatment: Implications for the Clinical Pharmacist

There is surmounting levels of evidence on the health disparities within cancer treatment in the United States (US). Most of the research focused on cancer specific factors including anticancer incidence, screening, treatment and follow-up, and clinical outcomes such as overall survival (OS). Less is known about the disparities present with supportive care medication use in cancer patients. Supportive care utilization during cancer treatment has been linked to improved quality of life (QoL) and OS among patients. The goal of this scoping review is to summarize findings of current literature on the relationship between race and ethnicity and the receipt of supportive care medications during cancer treatment for pain and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Our literature search included quantitative studies, qualitative studies, and grey literature written in the English language with clinically relevant outcomes pertaining to pain and CINV management in cancer treatment published from 2001-2021. Articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion in the analysis. The initial search yielded 308 studies. Following de-duplication and screening, 14 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria, with majority of the studies being quantitative studies (n=13). Collectively, results were mixed results regarding the presence of racial disparities for supportive care medication use. Half of the studies (n=7) supported this finding whereas, the other half (n=7) did not identify any racial disparities. In our review, multiple studies illustrate the existence of disparities in the use of supportive care medications in some cancer types. Clinical pharmacists should strive to eliminate supportive medication use disparities as part of a multidisciplinary team. In order to develop strategies to prevent supportive care medication use disparities in this population, further research and analysis of external factors that influence them are needed.

Atezolizumab plus tivozanib for immunologically cold tumor types: the IMMCO-1 trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy represents a significant advance in cancer care. The interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 induces immune tolerance and the inhibition of this interaction is an effective treatment strategy for numerous malignancies. Despite its demonstrated potential, immunotherapy is not clinically effective in immunogenically 'cold' tumors such as pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors. Through the inhibition of VEGF, it may be possible to potentiate the effect of immune checkpoint blockade in tumors that have traditionally shown a lack of clinical response to immunotherapy. This signal-seeking, single-arm, prospective clinical trial aims to determine the objective response of tivozanib and atezolizumab in advanced immunogenically cold solid tumors. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05000294 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Results of a phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in BAP1 and other DNA damage response pathway deficient neoplasms

3122

Background: BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) acts as a tumor suppressor and critical regulator of the cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR). PARP inhibitors (PARPi) demonstrate synthetic lethality in BAP1 mutant (mBAP1) preclinical models, independent of underlying germline BRCA status. mBAP1 leads to a loss of functional protein in several solid tumors. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients (pts) with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1. Methods: Eligible adult pts with measurable metastatic solid tumors having exhausted approved therapies, adequate organ function, and ECOG PS 0-1 were assigned to Cohort A (histology-specific): tumors likely to harbor mBAP1 (i.e., cholangiocarcinoma, uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, or clear cell renal cell carcinoma) with tissue available for mBAP1 confirmation; or Cohort B (histology-agnostic): tumors with other known non-BRCA confirmed DDR mutations. Known BRCA1 or 2 mutations or prior PARPi exposure were excluded. All pts received niraparib 200-300mg daily, depending on weight and/or platelet count. Radiographic response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 measured every 8 weeks while on treatment. The primary endpoint was ORR with secondary endpoints of PFS, OS, clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD), toxicity, and exploratory biomarker determinations. Cohort A employed Simon's optimal two-stage design to assess a 30% ORR increase (a = 0.05; power = 90%). Cohort B aimed to assess a 40% ORR increase for this molecularly selected/enriched patient population. Results: From 08/13/2018 to 12/21/2021, 37 pts enrolled from two different centers, with 32 evaluable for response (Cohort A n = 18; Cohort B n = 14). In Cohort A, best ORR was 1 PR (6%), 8 SD (44%; median 5.7 mo; range 2 - 9.4 mo), and 9 PD (50%). Cohort A was stopped at the first stage following the pre-specified Simon’s design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 pts (78%) with PR or SD but in only 2/9 (22%) in those with PD. In Cohort B, best ORR was 6 SD (43%; median 7.5 mo; range 3.3 - 8.6 mo) and 8 PD (57%). Mutations in those with SD included ATM, CHEK2, PTEN, RAD50, and ARID1A. Common grade 3/4 AEs observed were anemia (16%), thrombocytopenia (16%), nausea (11%), and vomiting (8%). There were no unexpected nor grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions: The use of niraparib was well tolerated in pts with advanced treatment refractory solid tumors but failed to meet pre-specified efficacy threshold of ORR. However, clinical benefit was identified in 78% of patients in cohort A who had a confirmed mBAP1 tumor. Further correlative analyses are ongoing and additional clinical development restricted to mBAP1 tumors may be justified. Clinical trial information: NCT03207347.

A phase II, open-label, pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEO-Nal-IRI study

TPS4196

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given pre-op. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved in combination with 5-FU/LV with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NALIRIFOX regimen as per the table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in pre-op setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30-day post-op complication rate. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

National Survey on the Effect of Oncology Drug Shortages in Clinical Practice: A Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association Survey

PURPOSE

Drug shortages are a clear and growing challenge. Prominent shortages included oncology medications and supportive care products essential for the care of patients with cancer. Oncology drug shortages often result in disruptions in the timing of chemotherapy treatments, alterations in the dose or regimen administered, or even missed doses when alternative agents are unavailable. The purpose of this survey was to characterize the impact of oncology drug shortages across the United States, including the experiences of health care organizations, resource implications, and the impact on patient safety, patient care, and clinical trials.

METHODS

A 36-item online survey was distributed to membership of the Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association to gather information on shortages of oncology drugs (ie, all drugs essential in the care of patients with cancer, including supportive care agents).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight US organizations participated in the survey between December 2019 and July 2020. Sixty-three percent of institutions reported one or more drug shortages per month, with a 34% increase in 2019 from 2018. Treatment delays, reduced doses, or alternative regimens were reported by 75% of respondents. The most difficult agents to obtain were vincristine, vinblastine, intravenous immunoglobulin, leucovorin, and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin.

CONCLUSION

A survey of US oncology pharmacists indicated that oncology drug shortages occurred frequently in 2020. Shortages led to delays in chemotherapy and changes in treatment or omission, complicated clinical research, and increased risk of medication errors and adverse outcomes.

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEO-Nal-IRI study

TPS619

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given pre-op. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5FU/LV is FDA approved with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NALIRIFOX regimen as per the table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in pre-op setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Exploratory ctDNA and stool microbiome analyses are also planned. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30-day post-op complication rate. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib/II study (IMMCO-1) of atezolizumab plus tivozanib in immunologically cold pancreatic, gallbladder, and biliary cancers

TPS491

Background: Checkpoint inhibition (CPI) represents a significant advance in cancer care however it is not effective in the treatment of several immunologically cold tumors including pancreatic, gallbladder, and biliary cancers where checkpoint inhibitors have produced objective response rates of <5%. VEGF is thought to play a key role in modulating the anti-tumor immune response. Secreted by tumors, it leads to endothelial cell proliferation, vascular permeability, and vasodilation that together leads to the development of an abnormal vasculature with excessive permeability and poor blood flow, thus limiting immune surveillance. In addition, VEGF inhibits dendritic cell differentiation, limiting the presentation of tumor antigens to CD4 and CD8 T cells. Through the inhibition of VEGF, it may be possible to potentiate the effect of immune checkpoint blockade. Combined use of a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and checkpoint inhibitor is already standard of care in advanced kidney, cervical and endometrial cancers. There has been suggestion that such a combination may have clinical activity in some microsatellite stable (MSS) GI malignancies. This signal seeking study aims to build upon those observations by incorporating a pan-VEGF axis inhibitor (tivozanib) with CPI. Methods: This is an open-label non-randomized phase Ib/II signal seeking basket study in multiple immunologically cold tumors. The co-primary endpoints are safety and efficacy of the combination of the VEGF-TKI tivozanib and CPI atezolizumab. Key eligibility criteria includes patients with MSS pancreatic, biliary (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder), well-differentiated grade 2 and 3 neuroendocrine tumors, ovarian and vulvar cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, castrate resistant prostate cancer, and HER2 positive hormone receptor negative breast cancer, that is metastatic and progressed on at least one line of therapy. Key exclusion criteria will include patients with known mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, or high tumor mutational burden. The phase Ib portion will assess the safety profile of the combination of tivozanib and atezolizumab with a potential dose de-escalation of tivozanib using a 3+3 study design. Starting doses include tivozanib 1.34 mg per day for 21 days of each 28-day cycle and atezolizumab 1680 mg on day 1 of every 28-day cycle. The phase II portion will enroll up to 26 additional patients using the dose of tivozanib found to be safe in the Ib portion. Disease response assessments are every 12 weeks with CT Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis via RECIST 1.1. Treatment will continue until progression or intolerance. This signal seeking study is looking to confirm the best objective response rate for evaluable patients increasing from <7% (null hypothesis) to 25% (one-sided alpha = 0.05; 80% power). Active enrollment continues. Clinical trial information: NCT05000294.

Impact of coronavirus of 2019 on the delivery of pharmacy services to patients with cancer: An international survey of oncology pharmacy practitioners

INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus of 2019 pandemic has necessitated vast and rapid changes in the way oncology pharmacy services are delivered around the world.

METHODS/AIMS

An international survey of oncology pharmacists and technicians was conducted via the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners and collaborating global pharmacy organisations to determine the impact that the coronavirus of 2019 has had on pharmacy service delivery, pharmacy practitioners and oncology practice.

RESULTS

The survey received 862 responses from 40 different countries from September to October 2020. The majority of respondents were pharmacists (n = 841, 97.6%), with 24% involved in the direct care of patients with the coronavirus of 2019. Of the survey participants, 55% increased their time working remotely, with remote activities including dispensing, patient assessment/follow-up and attending multi-disciplinary rounds. Respondents reported a 72% increase in the use of technology to perform remote patient interaction activities and that participation in educational meetings and quality improvement projects was reduced by 68% and 44%, respectively. Workforce impacts included altered working hours (50%), cancelled leave (48%) and forced leave/furloughing (30%). During the pandemic, respondents reported reduced access to intensive care (19%) and anti-cancer (15%) medications. In addition, 39% of respondents reported reduced access to personal protective equipment, including N95 masks for chemotherapy compounding. Almost half of respondents (49%) reported that cancer treatments were delayed or intervals were altered for patients being treated with curative intent. A third of practitioners (30%) believed that patient outcomes would be adversely impacted by changes to pharmacy services. Sixty-five percent of respondents reported impacts on their mental health, with 12% utilising support services.

CONCLUSION

The coronavirus of 2019 pandemic has altered the way oncology pharmacy services are delivered. These results demonstrate the adaptability of the oncology pharmacy profession and highlight the importance of formal evaluation of the varied practice models to determine the evidence-based practices that enhance pharmacy services and, thus, should be reinstated as soon as practical and reasonable.

National survey on the effect of oncology drug shortages in clinical practice: A Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) survey

e13609

Background: Drug shortages are a clear and growing challenge. Prominent shortages included oncology medications and supportive care products essential for the care of cancer patients. Oncology drug shortages often result in disruptions in the timing of chemotherapy treatments, alterations in the dose or regimen administered, or even missed doses when alternative agents are unavailable. The purpose of this survey was to characterize the impact of oncology drug shortages across the United States, including the experiences of health care organizations, resource implications, and the impact on patient safety, patient care, and clinical trials. Methods: A 34-item online survey was distributed to HOPA membership of the Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association to gather information on shortages of oncology drugs (i.e., all drugs essential in the care of cancer patients, including supportive care agents. Results: Sixty-eight organizations completed the survey; almost all completed by pharmacists, and analysis completed. Sixty-three percent of institutions reported one or more drugs shortages a month, with a 34.33% increase in 2019 from 2018. Sixty four percent of responded had incurred increased costs from oncology drugs shortages, with 7% noting reimbursement issues when switched to brand name therapies due to shortages. Treatment delays, reduced doses or alternative regimens were reported by 74.63% of respondents. The most common disease states which causes a dose delay of treatment included Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma with dose reductions noted in 36.36%, 36.36 and 15.91%. The top five oncology drugs on shortage included epirubicin, flutamide, decitabine, mechlorethamine, dactinomycin with the top 5 supportive care drugs on shortage being noted as hydrocortisone, bivalirudin, promethazine, mycophenolate sodium and scopolamine. Respondents noted medication errors related to oncology drug shortages at 4.48%, with noted errors including incorrect conversion from iv to oral etoposide and incorrect EMR drug builds. Oncology Drug shortages impacted clinical trials in 13.4% of respondents in which 54.55% of respondents noting patients not being enrolled in clinical trials. Conclusions: A survey of US oncology pharmacists and technicians indicated that oncology drug shortages occurred frequently in 2020. Shortages led to delays in chemotherapy and changes in treatment or omission, complicated clinical research and increased the risk of medication errors and adverse outcomes.

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NEO-Nal-IRI study) (NCT03483038)

TPS4170

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given neoadjuvantly. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NALIRIFOX regimen as per the table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in perioperative setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30 day postoperative complication rate. NCT03483038. NALIRIFOX regimen components given intravenously (IV) every 14 days. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

Lactate Dehydrogenase B and Pyruvate Oxidation Pathway Associated With Carfilzomib-Related Cardiotoxicity in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Result of a Multi-Omics Integrative Analysis

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most frequent hematologic cancer in the United States. Carfilzomib (CFZ), an irreversible proteasome inhibitor being used to treat relapsed and refractory MM, has been associated with cardiotoxicity, including heart failure. We hypothesized that a multi-omics approach integrating data from different omics would provide insights into the mechanisms of CFZ-related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs). Plasma samples were collected from 13 MM patients treated with CFZ (including 7 with CVAEs and 6 with no CVAEs) at the University of Florida Health Cancer Center. These samples were evaluated in global metabolomic profiling, global proteomic profiling, and microRNA (miRNA) profiling. Integrative pathway analysis was performed to identify genes and pathways differentially expressed between patients with and without CVAEs. The proteomics analysis identified the up-regulation of lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB) [fold change (FC) = 8.2, p = 0.01] in patients who experienced CVAEs. The metabolomics analysis identified lower plasma abundance of pyruvate (FC = 0.16, p = 0.0004) and higher abundance of lactate (FC = 2.4, p = 0.0001) in patients with CVAEs. Differential expression analysis of miRNAs profiling identified mir-146b to be up-regulatein (FC = 14, p = 0.046) in patients with CVAE. Pathway analysis suggested that the pyruvate fermentation to lactate pathway is associated with CFZ-CVAEs. In this pilot multi-omics integrative analysis, we observed the down-regulation of pyruvate and up-regulation of LDHB among patients who experienced CVAEs, suggesting the importance of the pyruvate oxidation pathway associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Validation and further investigation in a larger independent cohort are warranted to better understand the mechanisms of CFZ-CVAEs.

Newly diagnosed cardiovascular disease in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective analysis of patients at an academic tertiary care center

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a novel class of anticancer agents that have demonstrated clinical response for both solid and hematological malignancies. ICIs are associated with development of immune-related adverse events including cardiotoxicity. We estimated the incidence of newly diagnosed cardiovascular disease in patients treated with ICIs at a large, tertiary care center.

Methods

All patients with a cancer diagnosis who received any ICI treatment in the University of Florida’s Integrated Data Repository from 2011 to 2017 were included. Cardiovascular disease was defined as a new ICD diagnosis code for cardiomyopathy, heart failure, arrhythmia, heart block, pericardial disease, or myocarditis after initiation of ICI treatment.

Results

Of 102,701 patients with a diagnosis of malignancy, 424 patients received at least one ICI. Sixty-two (14.6%) patients were diagnosed with at least one new cardiovascular disease after initiation of ICI therapy. Of the 374 patients receiving one ICI, 21 (5.6%) developed heart failure. Of the 49 patients who received two ICIs sequentially, three (6.1%) developed heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy. Incident cardiovascular disease was diagnosed at a median of 63 days after initial ICI exposure. One patient developed myocarditis 28 days after receiving nivolumab. Mortality in ICI treated patients with a concomitant diagnosis of incident cardiovascular disease was higher compared to those who did not (66.1% vs. 41.4%, odds ratio = 2.77, 1.55–4.95, p = 0.0006).

Conclusions

This study suggests a high incidence of newly diagnosed cardiovascular disease after the initiation of ICI therapy in a real-world clinical setting.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40959-021-00097-9.

Phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) and other DNA damage response (DDR) pathway deficient neoplasms including cholangiocarcinoma

TPS354

Background: BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical regulator of the cell cycle, cellular differentiation, cell death, and DNA damage response. It also acts as a tumor suppressor. Preclinical models demonstrate significant synthetic lethality in BAP1 mutant cell lines and patient xenografts when treated with PARP inhibitors, independent of underlying BRCA status, suggesting this mutation confers a BRCA-like phenotype. BAP1 is mutated, leading to a loss of functional protein, in up to 30% of cholangiocarcinomas as well as several other solid tumors. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, single arm multicenter study aims to exploit the concept of synthetic lethality with the use of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in pts with metastatic relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Eligible pts with measurable metastatic and incurable solid tumors are assigned to one of two cohorts: Cohort A (histology-specific): tumors harboring suspected BAP1 mutations including cholangiocarcinoma, uveal melanoma, mesothelioma or clear cell renal cell carcinoma with tissue available for BAP1 mutational assessment via NGS or Cohort B (histology-agnostic): tumors with known DNA damage response (DDR) mutations (Table) confirmed by CLIA-approved NGS. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Pts with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations or prior PARPi exposure are excluded. Pts receive niraparib 200-300mg daily (depending on weight and/or platelet count) continuously. Primary endpoint is objective response rate with secondary endpoints of PFS, OS, toxicity and exploratory biomarker determinations. Radiographic response by RECIST criteria is measured every 8 weeks while on treatment. Cohort A has fully enrolled. Cohort B enrollment continues to a maximum of 47 total evaluable subjects with expansion cohorts allowable for histologic or molecular subtypes meeting pre-specified responses. NCT03207347 Clinical trial information: NCT03207347. [Table: see text]

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NEO-Nal-IRI Study)

TPS446

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given neoadjuvantly. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase II, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NALIRIFOX regimen as per the table below every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in perioperative setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30 day postoperative complication rate. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in BAP1 and other DNA damage response (DDR) pathway deficient neoplasms (NCT03207347)

e22061

Background: BRCA-associated protein-1 (BAP1) is a ubiquitin ligase associated with regulating cell cycle, cell proliferation, DNA damage pathway, and cell death. It also acts as a tumor suppressor gene as seen in hereditary cancer syndrome associated with germline mutations in BAP1. Preclinical studies have shown that PARP-inhibitor treatment of BAP1 mutant cell lines demonstrated significant synthetic lethality, independent of underlying BRCA status suggesting this mutation confers a BRCA-like phenotype. BAP1 is mutated, leading to a loss of functional protein, in up to 30% of several solid tumors including cholangiocarcinoma, mesothelioma, uveal melanoma, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, single arm study aims to exploit the concept of synthetic lethality with the use of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in two biologically distinct cohorts. Eligible patients (pts) with measurable metastatic and incurable solid tumors are assigned to one of the two cohorts: Cohort A (histology-specific): tumors harboring suspected BAP1 mutations including cholangiocarcinoma, uveal melanoma, mesothelioma or clear cell renal cell carcinoma with tissue available for BAP1 mutational assessment via Next Generation Sequencing (NGS); or Cohort B (histology-agnostic): tumors with known DNA damage response (DDR) mutations (Table) confirmed by CLIA-approved NGS. Key inclusion criteria also include age ≥18 years, adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG PS of 0 to 1. Key exclusion criteria include known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations or prior PARPi exposure. Pts receive niraparib 200-300mg daily (depending on weight and/or platelet count) continuously. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints are progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and exploratory biomarker determinations. Radiographic response by RECIST criteria is measured every 8 weeks while on treatment. Cohort B enrollment is closed. Enrollment in Cohort A continues. A maximum of 47 evaluable subjects is planned with expansion cohorts allowable for histologic or molecular subtypes meeting pre-specified responses. Clinical trial information: NCT03207347. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in BAP1 and other DNA damage response (DDR) pathway deficient neoplasms including cholangiocarcinoma

TPS591

Background: BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical regulator of the cell cycle, cellular differentiation, cell death, and DNA damage response. It also acts as a tumor suppressor. Preclinical models demonstrate significant synthetic lethality in BAP1 mutant cell lines and patient xenografts when treated with PARP inhibitors, independent of underlying BRCA status, suggesting this mutation confers a BRCA-like phenotype. BAP1 is mutated, leading to a loss of functional protein, in up to 30% of cholangiocarcinomas as well as several other solid tumors. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, single arm study aims to exploit the concept of synthetic lethality with the use of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in pts with metastatic relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Eligible pts with measurable metastatic and incurable solid tumors are assigned to one of two cohorts: Cohort A (histology-specific): tumors harboring suspected BAP1 mutations including cholangiocarcinoma, uveal melanoma, mesothelioma or clear cell renal cell carcinoma with tissue available for BAP1 mutational assessment via NGS or Cohort B (histology-agnostic): tumors with known DNA damage response (DDR) mutations (Table) confirmed by CLIA-approved NGS. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations or prior PARPi exposure are excluded. Pts receive niraparib 200-300mg daily (depending on weight and/or platelet count) continuously. Primary endpoint is objective response rate with secondary endpoints of PFS, OS, toxicity and exploratory biomarker determinations. Radiographic response by RECIST criteria is measured every 8 weeks on treatment. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 47 evaluable subjects with expansion cohorts allowable for histologic or molecular subtypes meeting pre-specified responses. Clinical trial information: NCT03207347.

[Table: see text]

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of Nal-IRI in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NEO-Nal-IRI Study) (NCT03483038)

TPS790

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PCa) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given neoadjuvantly. Irinotecan liposomal injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PCa. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with borderline resectable PCa without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board, adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive FOLFNal-IRINOX regimen as per Table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in perioperative setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30 day postoperative complication rate. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038 . [Table: see text]

Pharmacy Student Performance in a Capstone Course Utilizing the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process

Objective. To develop, implement, and assess student performance and confidence in a pharmacy capstone course that used case-based instruction and the Pharmacist's Patient Care Process (PPCP) to develop patient work-up skills in third-year Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students. Methods. A skills-based capstone course was developed by a team of faculty members and instructional designers that focused on patient evaluation skills and applying the steps of the PPCP to complex patient cases housed in a simulated electronic health record (SEHR). The acuity of the cases increased over the course of the semester. For each patient case, students were expected to identify drug-related problems and develop an assessment and plan based on the information provided in the SEHR. Results. Students (n=134) were assessed through weekly quizzes and two practical examinations. The average score for all quizzes was 81%. A significant correlation was found between average quiz scores and performance on the end-of-course practical examination. Student scores significantly improved from the first to the second practical examination (10.4 vs 12.9, respectively), and student confidence with regard to all course objectives significantly improved from the beginning to the end of the semester. Conclusion. A capstone course that applied the PPCP framework successfully taught third-year PharmD students the patient care skills they would need in advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Immune-mediated adverse events following influenza vaccine in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed treatment paradigms for various malignancies. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of complications and hospitalizations from influenza; therefore, it is recommended that they receive inactivated influenza vaccination. However, efficacy and safety of inactivated influenza vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors is uncertain. The objective of this prospective case series was to evaluate the incidence of immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) following inactivated influenza vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Changes in cytokine and chemokine levels were also evaluated.

METHODS

Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors during the 2017-2018 influenza season were eligible for study participation. Peripheral blood samples were collected prior to administration of inactivated influenza vaccine and two post-vaccination time points. Evaluation of new or worsening imAEs occurred via patient questionnaire and review of medical records for 60 days following inactivated influenza vaccination. Baseline imAEs were evaluated from review of medical records for 60 days prior to inactivated influenza vaccination. Serum cytokines and chemokines were measured using a multiplex Luminex assay.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Seven patients experienced any grade imAE (one patient having 2) within 60 days following inactivated influenza vaccination. The majority were Grades 1-2, including rash (n = 3), hypothyroidism, myalgia, and colitis (n = 1 each). Two patients experienced severe imAEs (grade 3 nephritis and grade 4 diabetes). No significant changes (p > 0.05) in serum cytokine or chemokine concentrations were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although small, our study suggests that inactivated influenza vaccine may be safely administered to patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The majority of imAEs following inactivated influenza vaccination were Grades 1-2 and did not require changes in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of nal-IRI in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NEO-Nal-IRI study)

TPS476

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PCa) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given neoadjuvantly. Irinotecan liposomal injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved with a very tolerable safety profile in refractory metastatic PCa. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen and demonstrate safe and effective delivery in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: This phase II, open-label, single-arm study targets patients with borderline resectable PCa without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Patients receive FOLFNal-IRINOX regimen as per table every two weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Patients who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within four to eight weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in perioperative setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable patients to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30 day postoperative complication rate. FOLFNal-IRINOX regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

Final toxicity results from a phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and dasatinib (FOLFOX-D) in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

504

Background: Systemic chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) improves survival but most targeted agents have consistently failed to demonstrate clinical benefits. Src is overexpressed in PCa and promotes an aggressive cancer phenotype. Dasatinib (D) is an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) affecting tumor proliferation through inhibition of Src, Bcr-Abl, CKit and other pathways. Inhibition of Src is associated with biologic modifications favorably modifying the PCa phenotype and has synergy with restoring inherent chemosensitivity. Src inhibition can also increase oxaliplatin activity and modulate Tcell responses. The addition of D to the well-established backbone of FOLFOX represents a multifaceted line of scientific investigation. Methods: This single arm phase II trial is to determine activity and toxicity of FOLFOX + D in previously untreated metastatic PCa. Pts must have at least 1 RECIST measurable target lesion, ECOG PS 0-2, normal QTc and adequate organ function. Treatment is standard q14d cycles of mFOLFOX6 with continuous D (150mg PO daily). Tumor assessments occur q8w. Endpoints are PFS (primary), objective and biochemical response rates, clinical benefit rate, freedom from metastases, overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life. Exploratory tissue, circulating tumor cell and serum analyses to identify predictors of response are planned, particularly in those with durable disease control or exceptional response. Sample size is based on a 50% improved median PFS from 4 (historical) to 6 months. Results: Enrollment is now closed on this prospective phase II study with 42 of 42 evaluable pts. Baseline demographics are in Table 1. Toxicity and outcomes continue to be assessed. Conclusions: Final toxicity data will be presented at the meeting for this novel combination treatment in advanced PCa. Clinical trial information: NCT01652976. [Table: see text]

The Emerging Role of PD-1/PD-L1-Targeting Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and evaluate immunotherapy agents targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) recently approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinomas (UC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was performed using PubMed (2012 to June 2017), the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases (2012 to June 2017 Annual Meetings/symposia), and the America Association for Cancer Research symposia (2012 to June 2017). A search using clinicaltrials.gov was conducted to identify studies for atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English language phase I to III studies assessing PD-1 and PD-L1 in UC were incorporated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have demonstrated clinical efficacy with tolerable toxicities in patients with metastatic UC with disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies may provide overall survival advantage; these are currently being evaluated in ongoing phase 3 studies. Greater objective response rates seem to be observed in PD-L1-positive patients versus PD-L1-negative patients, but methodologies in this assessment differ among clinical trials. The identification of biomarkers that provide greater insight into patients who positively respond to PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment options for metastatic UC have expanded to include PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. These agents should be strongly considered as second-line therapy over single-agent chemotherapy for patients who fail or progress after platinum-based treatment.

The Importance of Research and Scholarly Activity in Pharmacy Training

Regardless of practice setting, it is imperative that pharmacists be able to either participate in generating new knowledge or use the ever-expanding body of literature to guide patient care. However, competing priorities in Pharm.D. curricula and residency training programs have resulted in limited emphasis on acquiring research and scholarly skills. Factors likely contributing to this reduced focus include the lack of curricular and postgraduate training standards emphasizing the development of research skills, time to commit to scholarly activity, and accessibility to experienced mentors. Strategies for increasing scholarly activity for pharmacy students and residents should therefore continue to be a focus of professional degree and residency training programs. Several resources are available for academic planners, program directors, and institutions to augment scholarly experience for pharmacy trainees and clinicians. This commentary highlights the importance of providing research opportunities for students and residents, describes the potential barriers to these activities, and provides recommendations on how to increase the instruction and mentoring of trainees to generate and use research.

Clinical and Cost Comparison Evaluation of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Administration of EPOCH-Containing Regimens in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background:

Etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (EPOCH)-containing regimens are frequently utilized in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, however, the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving inpatient versus outpatient EPOCH has not been described. Additionally, no comparisons have been made regarding financial implications of EPOCH administration in either setting. This study’s primary objective was to compare hospital admissions for FN in patients receiving inpatient or outpatient EPOCH.

Methods:

A single-center, institutional review board-approved review was conducted for adults receiving EPOCH beginning January 2010. Clinical and financial data were collected through chart review and the institution’s financial department. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis.

Results:

A total of 25 patients received 86 cycles of an EPOCH-containing regimen (61 [70.9%] inpatient). Five (8.2%) inpatient cycles resulted in an admission for FN compared to 4 (16%) outpatient cycles. Prophylactic antifungal and antiviral agents were prescribed more often after inpatient cycles (>80%) compared to outpatient cycles (<50%). Overall, 27 (31.4%) of 86 cycles did not receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Outpatient EPOCH administration was associated with a cost savings of approximately US$141 116 for both chemotherapy costs and hospital day avoidance.

Conclusion:

EPOCH-containing regimens can be safely administered in the outpatient setting, which may result in cost savings for healthcare institutions.

Evaluation of romiplostim for the treatment of secondary failure of platelet recovery among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) is a serious complication observed in approximately 20% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Although the standard therapeutic approach has been frequent platelet transfusions, romiplostim, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, may have utility in treating SFPR. The primary objective of this single-center retrospective analysis was to assess effectiveness of romiplostim for SFPR and to evaluate patient factors which may influence clinical outcomes. The primary outcome measure of response was defined as achievement of platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/L without transfusions for ≥ 7 consecutive days. During the study period, 93 patients underwent HSCT and 13 (13.9%) received romiplostim for SFPR. Seven patients (53.8%) responded to romiplostim, requiring a median of three doses (range 1-6) to achieve independence from platelet transfusions. Disease relapse occurred in 38.5% of all patients, two responders and three nonresponders. Median survival post-HSCT was 753 days among responders and 266 days among nonresponders ( p = 0.0375). No serious adverse events were reported, and rates of graft-versus-host disease did not increase following administration of romiplostim. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists including romiplostim offer a treatment option for persistent thrombocytopenia following HSCT. Positive clinical response to romiplostim post-HSCT is associated with improved outcomes.

Fosaprepitant for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving BEAM or high-dose melphalan before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of single-dose fosaprepitant on nausea and emesis after BEAM and high-dose melphalan conditioning regimens for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

In a single-center cohort study patients receiving melphalan containing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation regimens who received a one-time dose of 150 mg IV fosaprepitant (n = 56) were compared to a historical control (n = 70).

RESULTS

The primary endpoint of no emesis from melphalan administration through five days afterward was 80% for the fosaprepitant group versus 66% in the control group (p = 0.068). Addition of fosaprepitant demonstrated significant improvement in emetic episodes per patient during the entire assessment period (p = 0.011) and days 1-5 after melphalan (p = 0.045). Fosaprepitant resulted in no substantial nausea during the entire assessment period in 37% of high-dose melphalan patients and 57% of BEAM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are suggested to investigate the optimal number and timing of doses of fosaprepitant in this setting.

Targeting Src-mediated Tyr216 phosphorylation and activation of GSK-3 in prostate cancer cells inhibit prostate cancer progression in vitro and in vivo

Recent studies suggest a positive correlation between glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) activation and tumor growth. Currently, it is unclear how both Akt that inhibits GSK-3 and active GSK-3 are maintained concurrently in tumor cells. We investigated the role of GSK-3 and the existence of an Akt-resistant pathway for GSK-3 activation in prostate cancer cells. Our data show that Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase is responsible for Y216GSK-3 phosphorylation leading to its activation even when Akt is active. Experiments involving mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking cSrc, Yes and Fyn, as well as Src activity modulation in prostate cancer cells with constitutively active (CA-Src) and dominant negative Src (DN-Src) plasmids demonstrated the integral role of Src in Y216GSK-3 phosphorylation and activity modulation. Inhibition of GSK-3 with SB415286 in PC3 cells resulted in impaired motility, proliferation and colony formation. Treatment of PC3 cells with the Src inhibitor dasatinib reduced Y216GSK-3 phosphorylation and inhibited proliferation, invasion and micrometastasis in vitro. Dasatinib treatment of athymic nude mice resulted in impaired growth of PC3 cell tumor xenograft. Together, we provide novel insight into the Src-mediated Y216GSK-3 phosphorylation and activation in prostate cancer cells and reveal the potential benefits of targeting Src-GSK-3 axis using drugs such as dasatinib.

Busulfan dosing (Q6 or Q24) with adjusted or actual body weight, does it matter?

BACKGROUND

In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), patients receive individualized treatment planning in conditioning regimens to prevent unwarranted toxicities while maximizing desired outcomes. The dose of a widely studied agent in this setting, busulfan, can be adjusted based on area under the curve (AUC); however, choice of actual body weight (ABW) versus adjusted body weight (DBW) weight to calculate the initial dose may be critical in attaining goal AUC.

OBJECTIVE

To determine which weight best correlates with achievement of goal AUC for patients receiving busulfan conditioning for HSCT. Secondary objectives include evaluation of AUC results with clinical outcomes such as toxicity and survival.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis was performed on 31 allogeneic HSCT recipients who received intravenous busulfan (Q6H with cyclophosphamide [Bu/Cy] or once daily with fludarabine [Flu/Bu]).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients received Flu/Bu (50% ABW, 50% DBW) and 13 received Bu/Cy (23% ABW, 77% DBW). Overall, patients dosed by DBW were more likely to undershoot goal AUC (-12.8% vs. +19.5%, p = 0.018) and require dose increases (+20% vs. -19.9%, p = 0.012) versus those dosed by ABW. Subgroup analysis confirmed these results for Bu/Cy (-23.6% vs. +2.2%, p < 0.001 for goal AUC; +36.2% vs. -4.5%, p = 0.008 for busulfan dose increase), but not Flu/Bu (-0.8% vs. +25.3%, p = 0.123 for goal AUC; +3.4% vs. -25.1%, p = 0.174 for busulfan dose increase). Time to engraftment, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not different between dosing groups (p > 0.05). No patient experienced busulfan-related toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate which weight is most likely to achieve goal AUC and subsequent optimal patient outcomes.

Romiplostim resistance in secondary failure of platelet recovery

Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin mimetic, is FDA approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Given the success of thrombopoietin agonists in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia, data in other clinical settings are emerging. In the bone marrow transplant setting, secondary failure of platelet recovery and persistent thrombocytopenia are associated with increased mortality. In this case, romiplostim was attempted in a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient who underwent a matched, unrelated donor, non-myeloablative stem cell transplant. This patient experienced profound thrombocytopenia despite dose escalation. Anti-thrombopoietin or anti-romiplostim antibodies were not detected by specific assays. Furthermore, the patient remains in disease remission with full chimerism. This case demonstrates that heavily pre-treated patients with limited bone marrow reserve may not respond to thrombopoietin agonists.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous disease, vast majority of these patients have a gain of function mutation in the gene encoding the tyrosine kinase KIT (KIT(D816V)). A small subset of SM patients with KIT(D816V) mutation require cytoreductive therapy. In these patients, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been actively investigated over the last decade because of codon 816 KIT mutations causing constitutive activation of tyrosine kinase activity of the molecule. The main question has been whether the success story with imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), another disease associated with a constitutively active tyrosine kinase, could be mimicked in mastocytosis. However, the results from various TKIs in SM with KIT(D816V) mutation have been disappointing to date. Only a few of the TKIs sufficiently block KIT(D816V) activity and have shown promising clinical results. The data from these studies indicate that, apart from KIT(D816V), other kinase targets and target pathways may play a role in disease evolution and progression, especially in patients with SM with an associated clonal hematological non-mast cell lineage disease (SM-AHNMD). Imatinib is effective in patients with increased mast cells and eosinophils associated with FIP1L1/PDGFRA+ (e.g., myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA) or rare patients with SM associated with KIT mutations outside of exon 17. This review will focus on the KIT receptor, KIT mutations, and the effects of the mutations in SM. The preclinical and clinical activities of FDA approved TKIs (for CML) as well as novel TKIs in SM will be evaluated.

Critical appraisal of nilotinib in frontline treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

The development of imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Follow-up analysis of IRIS trial participants continues to demonstrate durable responses for imatinib at 400 mg/day. However, 10%-15% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia will become imatinib-resistant or intolerant of adverse events. Phase II studies have shown that most of these patients will respond to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib. Both nilotinib and dasatinib have recently demonstrated clinical efficacy as frontline therapy in Phase III studies. In the ENESTnd trial, nilotinib 600-800 mg/day produced significantly higher major molecular rates and complete cytogenetic response rates in comparison with imatinib at 12 months. Recently, 18-month follow-up analysis of this trial continues to demonstrate superiority for nilotinib. It is unknown whether this will ultimately translate into improved long-term outcomes, such as event-free survival or overall survival. Nilotinib continues to be generally well tolerated and tends to produce less Grade 3/4 toxicity in frontline therapy when compared with its use following imatinib failure. With three tyrosine kinase inhibitors for potential frontline therapy and an active drug discovery pipeline, treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia is still subject to change with time as clinical algorithms continue to evolve.

Investigational drugs targeting FLT3 for leukemia

FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) is a member of the class III membrane receptor tyrosine kinase family and is important in survival, proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. FLT3 is mutated in approximately 30% of acute myelogenous leukemia patients. These mutations involve internal tandem duplications in the juxtamembrane domain of the receptor and tyrosine kinase point mutations in the activation loop. Over the past decade, due to the incidence and poor prognosis associated with FLT3, numerous agents have been developed to directly inhibit the activity of wild type and mutated FLT3. In this review, we focus on the preclinical data demonstrating in vitro activity, inhibition of downstream signaling pathways and potential synergy with traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Also, early clinical trial data specifically focusing on drug toxicity, clinical efficacy and future directions of FLT3-directed anticancer therapy are discussed.