1
|
Ralph JE, Ross JS, Zylstra AB, Kritcher AL, Robey HF, Young CV, Hurricane OA, Pak A, Callahan DA, Baker KL, Casey DT, Döppner T, Divol L, Hohenberger M, Pape SL, Patel PK, Tommasini R, Ali SJ, Amendt PA, Atherton LJ, Bachmann B, Bailey D, Benedetti LR, Berzak Hopkins L, Betti R, Bhandarkar SD, Biener J, Bionta RM, Birge NW, Bond EJ, Bradley DK, Braun T, Briggs TM, Bruhn MW, Celliers PM, Chang B, Chapman T, Chen H, Choate C, Christopherson AR, Clark DS, Crippen JW, Dewald EL, Dittrich TR, Edwards MJ, Farmer WA, Field JE, Fittinghoff D, Frenje J, Gaffney J, Gatu Johnson M, Glenzer SH, Grim GP, Haan S, Hahn KD, Hall GN, Hammel BA, Harte J, Hartouni E, Heebner JE, Hernandez VJ, Herrmann HW, Herrmann MC, Hinkel DE, Ho DD, Holder JP, Hsing WW, Huang H, Humbird KD, Izumi N, Jarrott LC, Jeet J, Jones O, Kerbel GD, Kerr SM, Khan SF, Kilkenny J, Kim Y, Geppert-Kleinrath H, Geppert-Kleinrath V, Kong C, Koning JM, Kroll JJ, Kruse MKG, Kustowski B, Landen OL, Langer S, Larson D, Lemos NC, Lindl JD, Ma T, MacDonald MJ, MacGowan BJ, Mackinnon AJ, MacLaren SA, MacPhee AG, Marinak MM, Mariscal DA, Marley EV, Masse L, Meaney KD, Meezan NB, Michel PA, Millot M, Milovich JL, Moody JD, Moore AS, Morton JW, Murphy TJ, Newman K, Di Nicola JMG, Nikroo A, Nora R, Patel MV, Pelz LJ, Peterson JL, Ping Y, Pollock BB, Ratledge M, Rice NG, Rinderknecht HG, Rosen M, Rubery MS, Salmonson JD, Sater J, Schiaffino S, Schlossberg DJ, Schneider MB, Schroeder CR, Scott HA, Sepke SM, Sequoia K, Sherlock MW, Shin S, Smalyuk VA, Spears BK, Springer PT, Stadermann M, Stoupin S, Strozzi DJ, Suter LJ, Thomas CA, Town RPJ, Trosseille C, Tubman ER, Volegov PL, Weber CR, Widmann K, Wild C, Wilde CH, Van Wonterghem BM, Woods DT, Woodworth BN, Yamaguchi M, Yang ST, Zimmerman GB. The impact of low-mode symmetry on inertial fusion energy output in the burning plasma state. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2975. [PMID: 38582938 PMCID: PMC10998902 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47302-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Indirect Drive Inertial Confinement Fusion Experiments on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) have achieved a burning plasma state with neutron yields exceeding 170 kJ, roughly 3 times the prior record and a necessary stage for igniting plasmas. The results are achieved despite multiple sources of degradations that lead to high variability in performance. Results shown here, for the first time, include an empirical correction factor for mode-2 asymmetry in the burning plasma regime in addition to previously determined corrections for radiative mix and mode-1. Analysis shows that including these three corrections alone accounts for the measured fusion performance variability in the two highest performing experimental campaigns on the NIF to within error. Here we quantify the performance sensitivity to mode-2 symmetry in the burning plasma regime and apply the results, in the form of an empirical correction to a 1D performance model. Furthermore, we find the sensitivity to mode-2 determined through a series of integrated 2D radiation hydrodynamic simulations to be consistent with the experimentally determined sensitivity only when including alpha-heating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Ralph
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA.
| | - J S Ross
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA.
| | | | - A L Kritcher
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - H F Robey
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | - C V Young
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - O A Hurricane
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - A Pak
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | | | - K L Baker
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D T Casey
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - T Döppner
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L Divol
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M Hohenberger
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S Le Pape
- Laboratoire pour l'utilisation des Lasers Intenses chez École Polytechnique, F-91128, Palaiseau Cedex, France
| | - P K Patel
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - R Tommasini
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S J Ali
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - P A Amendt
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L J Atherton
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B Bachmann
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D Bailey
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L R Benedetti
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L Berzak Hopkins
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - R Betti
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA
| | - S D Bhandarkar
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J Biener
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - R M Bionta
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - N W Birge
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | - E J Bond
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D K Bradley
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - T Braun
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - T M Briggs
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M W Bruhn
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - P M Celliers
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B Chang
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - T Chapman
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - H Chen
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - C Choate
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - A R Christopherson
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D S Clark
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | | | - E L Dewald
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - T R Dittrich
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M J Edwards
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - W A Farmer
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J E Field
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D Fittinghoff
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J Frenje
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - J Gaffney
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M Gatu Johnson
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - S H Glenzer
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - G P Grim
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S Haan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - K D Hahn
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - G N Hall
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B A Hammel
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J Harte
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - E Hartouni
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J E Heebner
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - V J Hernandez
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - H W Herrmann
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | - M C Herrmann
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D E Hinkel
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D D Ho
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J P Holder
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - W W Hsing
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - H Huang
- General Atomics, San Diego, CA, 92186, USA
| | - K D Humbird
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - N Izumi
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L C Jarrott
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J Jeet
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - O Jones
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - G D Kerbel
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S M Kerr
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S F Khan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J Kilkenny
- General Atomics, San Diego, CA, 92186, USA
| | - Y Kim
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | | | | | - C Kong
- General Atomics, San Diego, CA, 92186, USA
| | - J M Koning
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J J Kroll
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M K G Kruse
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B Kustowski
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - O L Landen
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S Langer
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D Larson
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - N C Lemos
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J D Lindl
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - T Ma
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M J MacDonald
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B J MacGowan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - A J Mackinnon
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S A MacLaren
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - A G MacPhee
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M M Marinak
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D A Mariscal
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - E V Marley
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L Masse
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - K D Meaney
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | - N B Meezan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - P A Michel
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M Millot
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J L Milovich
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J D Moody
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - A S Moore
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J W Morton
- Atomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, RG7 4PR, UK
| | - T J Murphy
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | - K Newman
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J-M G Di Nicola
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - A Nikroo
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - R Nora
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M V Patel
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L J Pelz
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J L Peterson
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - Y Ping
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B B Pollock
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M Ratledge
- General Atomics, San Diego, CA, 92186, USA
| | - N G Rice
- General Atomics, San Diego, CA, 92186, USA
| | - H G Rinderknecht
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA
| | - M Rosen
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M S Rubery
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J D Salmonson
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - J Sater
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S Schiaffino
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D J Schlossberg
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M B Schneider
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - C R Schroeder
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - H A Scott
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S M Sepke
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - K Sequoia
- General Atomics, San Diego, CA, 92186, USA
| | - M W Sherlock
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S Shin
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - V A Smalyuk
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B K Spears
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - P T Springer
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - M Stadermann
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - S Stoupin
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D J Strozzi
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - L J Suter
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - C A Thomas
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA
| | - R P J Town
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - C Trosseille
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - E R Tubman
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - P L Volegov
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop F663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
| | - C R Weber
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - K Widmann
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - C Wild
- Diamond Materials Gmbh, 79108, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C H Wilde
- Pacific Fusion, Fremont, CA, 94538, USA
| | - B M Van Wonterghem
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - D T Woods
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - B N Woodworth
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | | | - S T Yang
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| | - G B Zimmerman
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551-0808, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilbody S, Littlewood E, McMillan D, Atha L, Bailey D, Baird K, Brady S, Burke L, Chew-Graham CA, Coventry P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Henry A, Hollingsworth K, Newbronner E, Ryde E, Shearsmith L, Wang HI, Webster J, Woodhouse R, Clegg A, Dexter-Smith S, Gentry T, Hewitt C, Hill A, Lovell K, Sloan C, Traviss-Turner G, Pratt S, Ekers D. Behavioural activation to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions on older people in England and Wales (BASIL+): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Healthy Longev 2024; 5:e97-e107. [PMID: 38310902 PMCID: PMC10834375 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00238-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults were more likely to be socially isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased risk of depression and loneliness. We aimed to investigate whether a behavioural activation intervention delivered via telephone could mitigate depression and loneliness in at-risk older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS BASIL+ (Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation) was a pragmatic randomised controlled trial conducted among patients recruited from general practices in England and Wales, and was designed to assess the effectiveness of behavioural activation in mitigating depression and loneliness among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible participants were aged 65 years and older, socially isolated, with a score of 5 or higher on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and had multiple long-term conditions. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention (behavioural activation) or control groups by use of simple randomisation without stratification. Behavioural activation was delivered by telephone; participants were offered up to eight weekly sessions with trained BASIL+ Support Workers. Behavioural activation was adapted to maintain social connections and encourage socially reinforcing activities. Participants in the control group received usual care with existing COVID-19 wellbeing resources. The primary clinical outcome was self-reported depression severity, assessed by the PHQ-9, at 3 months. Outcomes were assessed masked to allocation and analysis was by treatment allocation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN63034289). FINDINGS Between Feb 8, 2021, and Feb 28, 2022, 449 eligible participants were identified and 435 from 26 general practices were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to the behavioural activation intervention (n=218) or to the control group (usual care with signposting; n=217). The mean age of participants was 75·7 years (SD 6·7); 270 (62·1%) of 435 participants were female, and 418 (96·1%) were White. Participants in the intervention group attended an average of 5·2 (SD 2·9) of eight remote behavioural activation sessions. The adjusted mean difference in PHQ-9 scores between the control and intervention groups at 3 months was -1·65 (95% CI -2·54 to -0·75, p=0·0003). No adverse events were reported that were attributable to the behavioural activation intervention. INTERPRETATION Behavioural activation is an effective and potentially scalable intervention that can reduce symptoms of depression and emotional loneliness in at-risk groups in the short term. The findings of this trial add to the range of strategies to improve the mental health of older adults with multiple long-term conditions. These results can be helpful to policy makers beyond the pandemic in reducing the global burden of depression and addressing the health impacts of loneliness, particularly in at-risk groups. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Littlewood
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Lucy Atha
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kalpita Baird
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Samantha Brady
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lauren Burke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Peter Coventry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Henry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Kelly Hollingsworth
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Han-I Wang
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Clegg
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Dexter-Smith
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Hill
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karyotaki E, Sijbrandij M, Purgato M, Acarturk C, Lakin D, Bailey D, Peckham E, Uygun E, Tedeschi F, Wancata J, Augustinavicius J, Carswell K, Välimäki M, van Ommeren M, Koesters M, Popa M, Leku MR, Anttila M, Churchill R, White RG, Al-Hashimi S, Lantta T, Au T, Klein T, Tol WA, Cuijpers P, Barbui C. Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ Ment Health 2023; 26:e300672. [PMID: 37524517 PMCID: PMC10391800 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
QUESTION Refugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to examine the effects and moderators of SH+ compared with Enhanced Care as Usual (ECAU) in reducing depressive symptoms among refugees and asylum seekers. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS Three randomised trials were identified with 1795 individual participant data (IPD). We performed an IPD meta-analysis to estimate the effects of SH+, primarily on depressive symptoms and second on post-traumatic stress, well-being, self-identified problems and functioning. Effects were also estimated at 5-6 months postrandomisation (midterm). FINDINGS There was no evidence of a difference between SH+ and ECAU+ in reducing depressive symptoms at postintervention. However, SH+ had significantly larger effects among participants who were not employed (β=1.60, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.00) and had lower mental well-being levels (β=0.02, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.05). At midterm, SH+ was significantly more effective than ECAU in improving depressive symptoms (β=-1.13, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.26), self-identified problems (β=-1.56, 95% CI -2.54 to -0.59) and well-being (β=6.22, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.90). CONCLUSIONS Although SH+ did not differ significantly from ECAU in reducing symptoms of depression at postintervention, it did present benefits for particularly vulnerable participants (ie, unemployed and with lower mental well-being levels), and benefits were also evident at midterm follow-up. These results are promising for the use of SH+ in the management of depressive symptoms and improvement of well-being and self-identified problems among refugees and asylum seekers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ceren Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Daniel Lakin
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ersin Uygun
- Department of Trauma and Disasters, Bilge University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Johannes Wancata
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jura Augustinavicius
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth Carswell
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Xiangya School of Nursing, The Xiangya Evidence-Based Practice and Healthcare Innovation, Central South University, Chang, People's Republic of China
| | - Mark van Ommeren
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Mariana Popa
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ross G White
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Sarah Al-Hashimi
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Teresa Au
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Klein
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wietse A Tol
- Xiangya School of Nursing, The Xiangya Evidence-Based Practice and Healthcare Innovation, Central South University, Chang, People's Republic of China
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Estrin-Serlui T, Bailey D, Osborn M. An occupational health survey of the UK's mortuary workforce. Occup Med (Lond) 2023; 73:208-210. [PMID: 37061840 DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqad048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortuaries are predominantly staffed by anatomical pathology technologists (APTs) and pathologists, and the work they undertake carries implicit health risk due to its nature. Until now there has not been a nationwide assessment of the occupational health of these essential workers in the UK. AIMS To assess the current occupational health status and needs of the mortuary workforce in the UK. METHODS We created a bespoke, brief online survey which was approved by the professional bodies representing APTs and pathologists in the UK. The survey was disseminated electronically using these organizations' targeted mailing lists. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty participants completed the survey, comprising 108 (47%) APTs and 122 (53%) pathologists. Most (89%) respondents reported that they have suffered from occupational health issues, the largest subcategory being musculoskeletal problems (77%). Almost half (48%) of APTs and around one-quarter (26%) of pathologists who responded have taken time off work in the last year because of occupational health problems, with almost one-fifth (19%) of the APTs having taken at least 4 weeks off. CONCLUSIONS A significant number of workhours are lost per year to sick leave resulting from occupational health problems. Respondents' comments highlight issues in workspaces, rest facilities and staffing, and variability in working conditions across the country. We suggest that future workforce planning should prioritize good occupational health, with nationwide improvements in mortuary design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Estrin-Serlui
- West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hemel Hempstead Hospital, Hemel Hempstead, UK
| | - D Bailey
- North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough City Hospital, Edith Cavell Campus, Bretton Gate, Peterborough PE3 9GZ, UK
| | - M Osborn
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Road, London W6 8RF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shearsmith L, Coventry PA, Sloan C, Henry A, Newbronner L, Littlewood E, Bailey D, Gascoyne S, Burke L, Ryde E, Woodhouse R, McMillan D, Ekers D, Gilbody S, Chew-Graham C. Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064694. [PMID: 36914198 PMCID: PMC10015671 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic heightened the need to address loneliness, social isolation and associated incidence of depression among older adults. Between June and October 2020, the Behavioural Activation in Social IsoLation (BASIL) pilot study investigated the acceptability and feasibility of a remotely delivered brief psychological intervention (behavioural cctivation) to prevent and reduce loneliness and depression in older people with long-term conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN An embedded qualitative study was conducted. Semi-structured interviews generated data that was analysed inductively using thematic analysis and then deductively using the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA). SETTING NHS and third sector organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS Sixteen older adults and nine support workers participating in the BASIL pilot study. RESULTS Acceptability of the intervention was high across all constructs of the TFA: Older adults and BASIL Support Workers described a positive Affective Attitude towards the intervention linked to altruism, however the activity planning aspect of the intervention was limited due to COVID-19 restrictions. A manageable Burden was involved with delivering and participating in the intervention. For Ethicality, older adults valued social contact and making changes, support workers valued being able to observe those changes. The intervention was understood by older adults and support workers, although less understanding in older adults without low mood (Intervention Coherence). Opportunity Cost was low for support workers and older adults. Behavioural Activation was perceived to be useful in the pandemic and likely to achieve its aims (Perceived Effectiveness), especially if tailored to people with both low mood and long-term conditions. Self-efficacy developed over time and with experience for both support workers and older adults. CONCLUSIONS Overall, BASIL pilot study processes and the intervention were acceptable. Use of the TFA provided valuable insights into how the intervention was experienced and how the acceptability of study processes and the intervention could be enhanced ahead of the larger definitive trial (BASIL+).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter A Coventry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Andrew Henry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Liz Newbronner
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Lauren Burke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Littlewood E, McMillan D, Chew Graham C, Bailey D, Gascoyne S, Sloane C, Burke L, Coventry P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Henry A, Hewitt C, Baird K, Ryde E, Shearsmith L, Traviss-Turner G, Woodhouse R, Webster J, Meader N, Churchill R, Eddy E, Heron P, Hicklin N, Shafran R, Almeida O, Clegg A, Gentry T, Hill A, Lovell K, Dexter-Smith S, Ekers D, Gilbody S. Can we mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation using behavioural activation? Long-term results of the UK BASIL urgent public health COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial and living systematic review. Evid Based Ment Health 2022; 25:e49-e57. [PMID: 36223980 PMCID: PMC9811092 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural and cognitive interventions remain credible approaches in addressing loneliness and depression. There was a need to rapidly generate and assimilate trial-based data during COVID-19. OBJECTIVES We undertook a parallel pilot RCT of behavioural activation (a brief behavioural intervention) for depression and loneliness (Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation, the BASIL-C19 trial ISRCTN94091479). We also assimilate these data in a living systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021298788) of cognitive and/or behavioural interventions. METHODS Participants (≥65 years) with long-term conditions were computer randomised to behavioural activation (n=47) versus care as usual (n=49). Primary outcome was PHQ-9. Secondary outcomes included loneliness (De Jong Scale). Data from the BASIL-C19 trial were included in a metanalysis of depression and loneliness. FINDINGS The 12 months adjusted mean difference for PHQ-9 was -0.70 (95% CI -2.61 to 1.20) and for loneliness was -0.39 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.65).The BASIL-C19 living systematic review (12 trials) found short-term reductions in depression (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0.31, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.11) and loneliness (SMD=-0.48, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.27). There were few long-term trials, but there was evidence of some benefit (loneliness SMD=-0.20, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.01; depression SMD=-0.20, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.07). DISCUSSION We delivered a pilot trial of a behavioural intervention targeting loneliness and depression; achieving long-term follow-up. Living meta-analysis provides strong evidence of short-term benefit for loneliness and depression for cognitive and/or behavioural approaches. A fully powered BASIL trial is underway. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Scalable behavioural and cognitive approaches should be considered as population-level strategies for depression and loneliness on the basis of a living systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dean McMillan
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Health and Population Science, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Coventry
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eloise Ryde
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | | | | | | | - Judith Webster
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - Nick Meader
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth Eddy
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Heron
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nisha Hicklin
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Roz Shafran
- PPP, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Paediatric Psychology Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Osvaldo Almeida
- UWA Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | - Tom Gentry
- Health and Care Policy, Age UK, London, UK
| | - Andrew Hill
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Dexter-Smith
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wijayatunga N, Chang Y, Brown A, Webster A, Sollid K, Bailey D. Signals of Environmental Sustainability and Influence On Food Purchasing Decisions By U.S. Consumers. J Acad Nutr Diet 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.08.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
8
|
Ali F, Musbahi O, Petohazi A, Sindhar J, Akilapa S, Bailey D, Harnett P. 974 Fragility Fractures of the Hip: A Matched Cohort Study of Acetabular Fractures and Neck of Femur Fractures. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac269.486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Due to an ageing population, acetabular fractures in the elderly are on the rise. Management of this group of patients remains controversial, especially as it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, there will be an increasing trend in low energy associated acetabular fractures. We present the largest cohort of operatively treated acetabular geriatric patients in the UK, comparing complications and mortality, and also comparing them to patients with neck of femur fractures.
Method
A review of a prospectively collected acetabular database was conducted. All patients over the age of 60 that had an operative fixation for an acetabular fracture from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Demographic data, operative details and complications were recorded. We cohort-matched these patients with neck of femur fractures during the same period to compare patient outcomes and cohort demographics.
Results
204 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 76. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall from less than 1 metre (64%). The mean length of stay for acetabular fractures was 25 days. In-hospital mortality was 3% and 10% for acetabular fractures and neck of femur fractures respectively.
Conclusion
There is little difference in demographic information between geriatric acetabular fractures and neck of femur fractures. Operatively treated geriatric acetabular fractures are associated with greater length of stay than neck of femur fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ali
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| | - O Musbahi
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| | - A Petohazi
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| | - J Sindhar
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| | - S Akilapa
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| | - D Bailey
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| | - P Harnett
- King’s College Hospital NHS Trust , London , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spanakis P, Peckham E, Young B, Heron P, Bailey D, Gilbody S. A systematic review of behavioural smoking cessation interventions for people with severe mental ill health-what works? Addiction 2022; 117:1526-1542. [PMID: 34697848 PMCID: PMC9298065 DOI: 10.1111/add.15724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS People with severe mental ill health smoke more and suffer greater smoking-related morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the effectiveness of behavioural interventions for smoking cessation in this group. This review evaluated randomized controlled trial evidence to measure the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions (both digital and non-digital) in people with severe mental ill health. DESIGN Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis. We searched between inception and January 2020 in Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Health Management Information Consortium and CENTRAL databases. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of behavioural smoking cessation and reduction interventions in adults with severe mental ill health, conducted in any country, in either in-patient or community settings and published in English. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was biochemically verified smoking cessation. Smoking reduction and changes in mental health symptoms and body mass index (BMI) were included as secondary outcomes. Narrative data synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted and the quality of included studies was appraised using the risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool. FINDINGS We included 12 individual studies (16 articles) involving 1861 participants. The first meta-analysis (three studies, 921 participants) demonstrated effectiveness of bespoke face-to-face interventions compared with usual care across all time-points [medium-term: relative risk (RR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.38-3.81; long-term: RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.09-2.30]. The second (three studies, 275 participants) did not demonstrate any difference in effectiveness of bespoke digital on-line interventions compared with standard digital on-line interventions (medium-term: RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.17-4.46). A narrative overview revealed mixed results when comparing bespoke face-to-face interventions with other active interventions. The methodological quality of studies was mixed, with the majority having some concerns mainly around risk of selective reporting. CONCLUSIONS Face-to-face bespoke smoking cessation interventions for adults with severe mental ill health appear to be effective when compared with treatment as usual, but evidence is equivocal when compared with other active interventions. There is limited evidence comparing bespoke digital interventions with generic interventions, and we found no studies comparing them with usual treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Spanakis
- Department of Health Sciences and Closing the Gap NetworkUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences and Closing the Gap NetworkUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Ben Young
- Institute of Health and WellbeingUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences and Closing the Gap NetworkUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences and Closing the Gap NetworkUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences and Closing the Gap NetworkUniversity of YorkYorkUK,York Hull Medical SchoolUniversity of York, HeslingtonYorkUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Sharif HF, Dennison SR, Tully M, Crossley S, Mwangi W, Bailey D, Graham SP, Reddy SM. Evaluation of electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymers (E-MIPs) on disposable electrodes for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva. Anal Chim Acta 2022; 1206:339777. [PMID: 35473858 PMCID: PMC8974637 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
We investigate electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymers (E-MIPs) for the selective recognition of SARS-CoV-2 whole virus. E-MIPs imprinted with SARS-CoV-2 pseudoparticles (pps) were electrochemically deposited onto screen printed electrodes by reductive electropolymerization, using the water-soluble N-hydroxmethylacrylamide (NHMA) as functional monomer and crosslinked with N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBAm). E-MIPs for SARS-CoV-2 showed selectivity for template SARS-CoV-2 pps, with an imprinting factor of 3:1, and specificity (significance = 0.06) when cross-reacted with other respiratory viruses. E-MIPs detected the presence of SARS-CoV-2 pps in <10 min with a limit of detection of 4.9 log10 pfu/mL, suggesting their suitability for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with minimal sample preparation. Using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and principal component analysis (PCA), the capture of SARS-CoV-2 from real patient saliva samples was also evaluated. Fifteen confirmed COVID-19 positive and nine COVID-19 negative saliva samples were compared against the established loop-mediated isothermal nucleic acid amplification (LAMP) technique used by the UK National Health Service. EIS data demonstrated a PCA discrimination between positive and negative LAMP samples. A threshold real impedance signal (ZRe) ≫ 4000 Ω and a corresponding charge transfer resistance (RCT) ≫ 6000 Ω was indicative of absence of virus (COVID-19 negative) in agreement with values obtained for our control non-imprinted polymer control. A ZRe at or below a threshold value of 600 Ω with a corresponding RCT of <1200 Ω was indicative of a COVID-19 positive sample. The presence of virus was confirmed by treatment of E-MIPs with a SARS-CoV-2 specific monoclonal antibody.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H F El Sharif
- Department of Chemistry, UCLan Centre for Smart Materials, School of Natural Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, United Kingdom
| | - S R Dennison
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, United Kingdom
| | - M Tully
- The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
| | - S Crossley
- The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
| | - W Mwangi
- The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
| | - D Bailey
- The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
| | - S P Graham
- The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
| | - S M Reddy
- Department of Chemistry, UCLan Centre for Smart Materials, School of Natural Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burke L, Littlewood E, Gascoyne S, McMillan D, Chew-Graham CA, Bailey D, Sloan C, Fairhurst C, Baird K, Hewitt C, Henry A, Ryde E, Shearsmith L, Coventry P, Crosland S, Newbronner E, Traviss-Turner G, Woodhouse R, Clegg A, Gentry T, Hill A, Lovell K, Dexter Smith S, Webster J, Ekers D, Gilbody S. Behavioural Activation for Social IsoLation (BASIL+) trial (Behavioural activation to mitigate depression and loneliness among older people with long-term conditions): Protocol for a fully-powered pragmatic randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0263856. [PMID: 35324908 PMCID: PMC8947398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Depression is a leading mental health problem worldwide. People with long-term conditions are at increased risk of experiencing depression. The COVID-19 pandemic led to strict social restrictions being imposed across the UK population. Social isolation can have negative consequences on the physical and mental wellbeing of older adults. In the Behavioural Activation in Social IsoLation (BASIL+) trial we will test whether a brief psychological intervention (based on Behavioural Activation), delivered remotely, can mitigate depression and loneliness in older adults with long-term conditions during isolation. Methods We will conduct a two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial across several research sites, to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the BASIL+ intervention. Participants will be recruited via participating general practices across England and Wales. Participants must be aged ≥65 with two or more long-term conditions, or a condition that may indicate they are within a ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ group in relation to COVID-19, and have scored ≥5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), to be eligible for inclusion. Randomisation will be 1:1, stratified by research site. Intervention participants will receive up to eight intervention sessions delivered remotely by trained BASIL+ Support Workers and supported by a self-help booklet. Control participants will receive usual care, with additional signposting to reputable sources of self-help and information, including advice on keeping mentally and physically well. A qualitative process evaluation will also be undertaken to explore the acceptability of the BASIL+ intervention, as well as barriers and enablers to integrating the intervention into participants’ existing health and care support, and the impact of the intervention on participants’ mood and general wellbeing in the context of the COVID-19 restrictions. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with intervention participants, participant’s caregivers/supportive others and BASIL+ Support Workers. Outcome data will be collected at one, three, and 12 months post-randomisation. Clinical and cost-effectiveness will be evaluated. The primary outcome is depressive symptoms at the three-month follow up, measured by the PHQ9. Secondary outcomes include loneliness, social isolation, anxiety, quality of life, and a bespoke health services use questionnaire. Discussion This study is the first large-scale trial evaluating a brief Behavioural Activation intervention in this population, and builds upon the results of a successful external pilot trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov identifier ISRCTN63034289, registered on 5th February 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Burke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Samantha Gascoyne
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kalpita Baird
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Henry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Leanne Shearsmith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Coventry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Crosland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Rebecca Woodhouse
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Gentry
- Age UK, Tavis House, 1–6 Tavistock Square, London United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Hill
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Dexter Smith
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | | | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Littlewood E, Chew-Graham CA, Coleman E, Gascoyne S, Sloan C, Ali S, Badenhorst J, Bailey D, Crosland S, Kitchen CEW, McMillan D, Pearson C, Todd A, Whittlesea C, Bambra C, Hewitt C, Jones C, Keding A, Newbronner E, Paterson A, Rhodes S, Ryde E, Toner P, Watson M, Gilbody S, Ekers D. A psychological intervention by community pharmacies to prevent depression in adults with subthreshold depression and long-term conditions: the CHEMIST pilot RCT. Public Health Res 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/ekze0617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Depression is common in people with long-term health conditions, and this combination can lead to worsened health outcomes and increased health-care costs. Subthreshold depression, a risk factor for major depression, is prevalent in this population, but many people remain untreated due to the demand on services. The community pharmacy may be an alternative setting to offer mental health support; however, insufficient evidence exists to support implementation.
Objectives
To conduct a feasibility study and pilot randomised controlled trial of a community pharmacy-delivered psychological intervention aimed at preventing depression in adults with long-term health conditions.
Design
A feasibility study with nested qualitative evaluation and an external pilot, two-arm, 1 : 1 individually randomised controlled trial with nested process and economic evaluations.
Setting
Community pharmacies in the north of England.
Participants
Adults aged ≥ 18 years with subthreshold depression and at least one long-term health condition.
Intervention
A bespoke enhanced support intervention (behavioural activation within a collaborative care framework) involving up to six sessions delivered by trained community pharmacy staff (intervention facilitators) compared with usual care.
Main outcome measures
Recruitment and retention rates, completeness of outcome measures and intervention engagement. The intended primary outcome was depression severity at 4 months, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Results
In the feasibility study, 24 participants were recruited. Outcome measure completeness was 95–100%. Retention at 4 months was 83%. Seventeen participants (71%) commenced intervention sessions and all completed two or more sessions. Depression symptoms reduced slightly at 4 months. The process evaluation suggested that the intervention was acceptable to participants and intervention facilitators. In the pilot randomised controlled trial, 44 participants (target of 100 participants) were randomised (intervention, n = 24; usual care, n = 20). Outcome measure completeness was 100%. Retention at 4 months was 93%. Eighteen participants (75%) commenced intervention sessions and 16 completed two or more sessions. Depression symptoms reduced slightly at 4 months, with a slightly larger reduction in the usual-care arm, although the small sample size limits any conclusions. The process evaluation reported good acceptability of the intervention and identified barriers associated with study implementation and its impact on core pharmacy functions. The economic analysis revealed some indication of reduced resource use/costs associated with the intervention, but this is limited by the small sample size. Intervention costs were low.
Limitations
The main limitation is the small sample size due to difficulties with recruitment and barriers to implementing the study within existing pharmacy practices.
Conclusions
The community pharmacy represents a new setting to deliver a depression prevention intervention. Recruitment was a challenge and pharmacy staff encountered barriers to effective implementation of the study within busy pharmacy practice. Despite these challenges, good retention rates and intervention engagement were demonstrated, and process evaluation suggested that the intervention was acceptable in this setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that community pharmacy staff can be trained to deliver a depression prevention intervention.
Future work
Further work is needed to address barriers to recruitment, intervention delivery and implementation of psychological interventions in the community pharmacy setting.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN11290592.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jay Badenhorst
- Whitworth Chemists Ltd, Foxhills Industrial Estate, Scunthorpe, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Adam Todd
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Cate Whittlesea
- University College London School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Bambra
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Claire Jones
- Public Health Team, Adult & Health Services, Durham County Council, Durham, UK
| | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Alastair Paterson
- Pharmacy Department, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Shelley Rhodes
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Paul Toner
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chew-Graham CA, Kitchen CEW, Gascoyne S, Littlewood E, Coleman E, Bailey D, Crosland S, Pearson C, Ali S, Badenhorst J, Bambra C, Hewitt C, Jones C, Keding A, McMillan D, Sloan C, Todd A, Toner P, Whittlesea C, Watson M, Gilbody S, Ekers D. The feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychological intervention for adults with long-term health conditions and subthreshold depression delivered via community pharmacies: a mixed methods evaluation-the Community Pharmacies Mood Intervention Study (CHEMIST). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:27. [PMID: 35115052 PMCID: PMC8812235 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-00992-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with long-term health conditions (LTCs) are more likely to experience depressive symptoms which can worsen health outcomes and quality of life, and increase healthcare costs. Subthreshold depression may go undetected and/or untreated. The Community Pharmacies Mood Intervention Study (CHEMIST) explored whether community pharmacies represent a suitable setting to offer brief psychological support to people with LTCs and comorbid subthreshold depression. METHODS A feasibility intervention study with a nested mixed methods evaluation was employed. Adults with subthreshold depression and a minimum of one LTC were recruited from community pharmacies/local general practices and offered a brief psychological support intervention ('Enhanced Support Intervention' (ESI)), based on behavioural activation within a Collaborative Care framework. The intervention included up to six sessions supported by pharmacy staff ('ESI facilitators') trained to deliver the ESI within the community pharmacy setting. Recruitment, retention rates and engagement with the ESI were assessed. Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with pharmacy staff and study participants, and a focus group with pharmacy staff, explored experiences and acceptability of the study and the ESI. Themes were mapped onto constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS Recruitment of ESI participants was challenging and slower than anticipated despite the varied methods of recruitment employed; although, this was useful in identifying barriers and enabling factors for participation. Engagament with the ESI was good with n=17 (71%) recruited participants commencing the ESI. The ESI was found to be acceptable to participants and ESI facilitators. Retention rate at 4 months was good n=20 (87.0%). The main barriers to identifying potential participants for pharmacy staff were lack of time, resources and limited experience in research. The ESI training and support manual were acceptable to ESI facilitators. The ESI and supporting patient workbook were acceptable to people with LTCs and subthreshold depression. CONCLUSIONS Community pharmacies were viewed as an acceptable setting in which to deliver preventative brief psychological support to people with LTCs at risk of depression. This feasibility study provided important data to inform the design of a pilot randomised controlled trial in this setting and highlighted important considerations for future pharmacy-based research. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN11290592.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Shehzad Ali
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Badenhorst
- Whitworth Chemists Ltd, Foxhills Industrial Estate, Scunthorpe, UK
| | - Clare Bambra
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | | | - Claire Jones
- Public Health Team, Adult & Health Services, Durham County Council, Durham, UK
| | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Adam Todd
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.,School of Pharmacy, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Toner
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Cate Whittlesea
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilbody S, Brabyn S, Mitchell A, Ekers D, McMillan D, Bailey D, Hems D, Chew Graham CA, Keding A, Bosanquet K. Can We Prevent Depression in At-Risk Older Adults Using Self-Help? The UK SHARD Trial of Behavioral Activation. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 30:197-207. [PMID: 34266750 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of established depression is the dominant approach to care of older adults, but prevention holds much promise. Self-help interventions are a feasible preventive approach, since they are scalable and low cost. There are few trials in this area. Behavioral Activation (BA) is a credible candidate psychological approach, which has been shown to work in therapist led care but not been trialled in a self-help form. AIM To test the effectiveness of an unguided self-help intervention based on BA for older adults. METHODS We compared a self-help intervention based on BA for older people (n = 172) to usual care (n = 160) in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Outcomes were depression status and severity (PHQ9) and health related quality of life (SF12). The primary timepoint of the primary outcome was depression at 4 months, with longer term follow up at 12 months to test sustained impact of the primary outcome. RESULTS At 4 months adjusted PHQ-9 scores for BA self-help were 0.79 lower (95% CI: -1.70 to 0.13; p = 0.09) and the proportion of participants with case-level depression was significantly reduced (BA 31/137 (22.6%) versus usual care 41/141 (29.1%); Odds Ratio 0.48; 95% CI: 0.26-0.92; p = 0.03). There was no PHQ-9 difference at 12 months or for health related quality of life at any point (4 or 12 months). DISCUSSION Self-help using BA for older people at risk of depression is a feasible and scalable intervention with potential short-term benefits in preventing depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK; Hull York Medical School (SG, DM), UK.
| | - Sally Brabyn
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK
| | - Alex Mitchell
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK; York Trials Unit (AM, AD), University of York, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK; Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (DE), North Yorkshire, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK; Hull York Medical School (SG, DM), UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK
| | - Deborah Hems
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK
| | | | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK; York Trials Unit (AM, AD), University of York, UK
| | - Kate Bosanquet
- Department of Health Sciences (SG, SB, AM, DE, DM, DB, DH, AK, KB), University of York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gilbody S, Littlewood E, McMillan D, Chew-Graham CA, Bailey D, Gascoyne S, Sloan C, Burke L, Coventry P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Henry A, Hewitt C, Joshi K, Ryde E, Shearsmith L, Traviss-Turner G, Woodhouse R, Clegg A, Gentry T, Hill AJ, Lovell K, Dexter Smith S, Webster J, Ekers D. Behavioural activation to prevent depression and loneliness among socially isolated older people with long-term conditions: The BASIL COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003779. [PMID: 34637450 PMCID: PMC8509874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults, including those with long-term conditions (LTCs), are vulnerable to social isolation. They are likely to have become more socially isolated during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, often due to advice to "shield" to protect them from infection. This places them at particular risk of depression and loneliness. There is a need for brief scalable psychosocial interventions to mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation. Behavioural activation (BA) is a credible candidate intervention, but a trial is needed. METHODS AND FINDINGS We undertook an external pilot parallel randomised trial (ISRCTN94091479) designed to test recruitment, retention and engagement with, and the acceptability and preliminary effects of the intervention. Participants aged ≥65 years with 2 or more LTCs were recruited in primary care and randomised by computer and with concealed allocation between June and October 2020. BA was offered to intervention participants (n = 47), and control participants received usual primary care (n = 49). Assessment of outcome was made blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was depression severity (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)). We also measured health-related quality of life (measured by the Short Form (SF)-12v2 mental component scale (MCS) and physical component scale (PCS)), anxiety (measured by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)), perceived social and emotional loneliness (measured by the De Jong Gierveld Scale: 11-item loneliness scale). Outcome was measured at 1 and 3 months. The mean age of participants was aged 74 years (standard deviation (SD) 5.5) and they were mostly White (n = 92, 95.8%), and approximately two-thirds of the sample were female (n = 59, 61.5%). Remote recruitment was possible, and 45/47 (95.7%) randomised to the intervention completed 1 or more sessions (median 6 sessions) out of 8. A total of 90 (93.8%) completed the 1-month follow-up, and 86 (89.6%) completed the 3-month follow-up, with similar rates for control (1 month: 45/49 and 3 months 44/49) and intervention (1 month: 45/47and 3 months: 42/47) follow-up. Between-group comparisons were made using a confidence interval (CI) approach, and by adjusting for the covariate of interest at baseline. At 1 month (the primary clinical outcome point), the median number of completed sessions for people receiving the BA intervention was 3, and almost all participants were still receiving the BA intervention. The between-group comparison for the primary clinical outcome at 1 month was an adjusted between-group mean difference of -0.50 PHQ-9 points (95% CI -2.01 to 1.01), but only a small number of participants had completed the intervention at this point. At 3 months, the PHQ-9 adjusted mean difference (AMD) was 0.19 (95% CI -1.36 to 1.75). When we examined loneliness, the adjusted between-group difference in the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale at 1 month was 0.28 (95% CI -0.51 to 1.06) and at 3 months -0.87 (95% CI -1.56 to -0.18), suggesting evidence of benefit of the intervention at this time point. For anxiety, the GAD adjusted between-group difference at 1 month was 0.20 (-1.33, 1.73) and at 3 months 0.31 (-1.08, 1.70). For the SF-12 (physical component score), the adjusted between-group difference at 1 month was 0.34 (-4.17, 4.85) and at 3 months 0.11 (-4.46, 4.67). For the SF-12 (mental component score), the adjusted between-group difference at 1 month was 1.91 (-2.64, 5.15) and at 3 months 1.26 (-2.64, 5.15). Participants who withdrew had minimal depressive symptoms at entry. There were no adverse events. The Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation (BASIL) study had 2 main limitations. First, we found that the intervention was still being delivered at the prespecified primary outcome point, and this fed into the design of the main trial where a primary outcome of 3 months is now collected. Second, this was a pilot trial and was not designed to test between-group differences with high levels of statistical power. Type 2 errors are likely to have occurred, and a larger trial is now underway to test for robust effects and replicate signals of effectiveness in important secondary outcomes such as loneliness. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that BA is a credible intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 isolation for older adults. We demonstrated that it is feasible to undertake a trial of BA. The intervention can be delivered remotely and at scale, but should be reserved for older adults with evidence of depressive symptoms. The significant reduction in loneliness is unlikely to be a chance finding, and replication will be explored in a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN94091479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Gascoyne
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Burke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Coventry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Crosland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Henry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Kalpita Joshi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Leanne Shearsmith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rebecca Woodhouse
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew J. Hill
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Dexter Smith
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | | | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bailey D, Bruno L, Spano M, Crosby M, Sterling S. Adapting Communications of a Nutrition and Physical Activity Study to Reach Registered Dietitians During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Acad Nutr Diet 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
17
|
Walker L, Bailey D, Churchill R, Peckham E. Remote data collection during COVID-19 restrictions: an example from a refugee and asylum-seeker participant group in the UK. Trials 2021; 22:117. [PMID: 33546716 PMCID: PMC7863031 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05058-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
This article describes how one trial site of the Refugee Emergency: Defining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions (RE-DEFINE) study, designed to evaluate a Self Help+ intervention with Arabic-speaking refugees and asylum seekers currently living in the UK and experiencing stress, was adapted to accommodate social distancing rules and working from home during the COVID-19 restrictions. Digital divide, risk and safety management, acceptability of remote data collection and practical considerations are described. The adaptions to methods have practical implications for researchers looking for more flexible approaches in response to continuing restrictions resulting from COVID-19, and the authors believe that others could adopt such an approach. The need for a further acceptability study focusing on human and economic costs and benefits of telephone and video as an alternative to face-to-face data collection is indicated. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Refugee Emergency - Defining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions RE-DEFINE. (Trials registration numbers NCT03571347 , NCT03587896 ) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030259 (2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Walker
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Della Bailey
- York Mental Health Research Group, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gilbody S, Peckham E, Bailey D, Arundel C, Heron P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Li J. Smoking cessation in severe mental illness: combined long-term quit rates from the UK SCIMITAR trials programme. Br J Psychiatry 2021; 218:95-97. [PMID: 31685048 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Smoking contributes to health inequalities for people with severe mental illness (SMI). Although smoking cessation interventions are effective in the short term, there are few long-term trial-based estimates of abstinence. The SCIMITAR trials programme includes the largest trial to date of a smoking cessation intervention for people with SMI, but this was underpowered to detect anticipated long-term quit rates. By pooling pilot and full-trial data we found that quit rates were maintained at 12 months (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.02-2.73, P = 0.04). Policymakers can now be confident that bespoke smoking cessation interventions produce successful short- and long-term quitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Professor of Psychological Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Manager of the SCIMITAR trial and Research Fellow, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Research Fellow, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Catherine Arundel
- Trials Coordinator, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Paul Heron
- Research Fellow, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Suzanne Crosland
- Research Fellow, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | | | - Catherine Hewitt
- Professor of Medical Statistics, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Jinshuo Li
- Research Fellow, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karyotaki E, Sijbrandij M, Purgato M, Acarturk C, Lakin D, Bailey D, Peckham E, Uygun E, Tedeschi F, Wancata J, Augustinavicius J, Carswell K, Välimäki M, van Ommeren M, Koesters M, Popa M, Leku MR, Anttila M, Churchill R, White R, Al-Hashimi S, Lantta T, Au T, Klein T, Tol WA, Cuijpers P, Barbui C. Self-help plus for refugees and asylum seekers; study protocol for a series of individual participant data meta-analyses. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2021; 12:1930690. [PMID: 34262667 PMCID: PMC8259851 DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1930690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugees and asylum seekers face various stressors due to displacement and are especially vulnerable to common mental disorders. To effectively manage psychological distress in this population, innovative interventions are required. The World Health Organization (WHO) Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention has shown promising outcomes in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders among refugees and asylum seekers. However, individual participant differences in response to SH+ remain largely unknown. The Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis synthesizes raw datasets of trials to provide cutting-edge evidence of outcomes that cannot be examined by conventional meta-analytic approaches. OBJECTIVES This protocol outlines the methods of a series of IPD meta-analyses aimed at examining the effects and potential moderators of SH+ in (a) reducing depressive symptoms at post-intervention and (b) preventing the six-month cumulative incidence of mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers. METHOD RCTs on SH+ have been identified through WHO and all authors have agreed to share the datasets of the trials. The primary outcomes of the IPD meta-analyses are (a) reduction in depressive symptoms at post-intervention, and (b) prevention of six-month cumulative incidence of mental disorders. Secondary outcomes include post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, well-being, functioning, quality of life, and twelve-month cumulative incidence of mental disorders. One-stage IPD meta-analyses will be performed using mixed-effects linear/logistic regression. Missing data will be handled by multiple imputation. CONCLUSIONS These results will enrich current knowledge about the response to SH+ and will facilitate its targeted dissemination. The results of these IPD meta-analyses will be published in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ceren Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Daniel Lakin
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ersin Uygun
- Department of Trauma and Disasters, Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Johannes Wancata
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jura Augustinavicius
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ken Carswell
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Mark van Ommeren
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Mariana Popa
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ross White
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sarah Al-Hashimi
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Teresa Au
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Klein
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wietse A Tol
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hout D, Seitz R, Bailey D, Schweitzer B, Nielsen T, Vidal G. PR01.03 A Novel 27-Gene Signature Associated with Better Outcomes for NSCLC Patients Treated with IO Therapies with PD-L1 Expression >50%. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
21
|
Li J, Fairhurst C, Peckham E, Bailey D, Arundel C, Hewitt C, Heron P, Crosland S, Parrott S, Gilbody S. Cost-effectiveness of a specialist smoking cessation package compared with standard smoking cessation services for people with severe mental illness in England: a trial-based economic evaluation from the SCIMITAR+ study. Addiction 2020; 115:2113-2122. [PMID: 32319154 DOI: 10.1111/add.15086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a specialist smoking cessation package for people with severe mental illness DESIGN: Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective over a 12-month time horizon. Total costs, including smoking cessation, health-care and social services costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), derived from the five-level EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5 L), collected from a randomized controlled trial, were used as outcome measures. The bootstrap technique was employed to assess the uncertainty. SETTING Sixteen primary care and 21 secondary care mental health sites in England. PARTICIPANTS Adult smokers with bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia and related illnesses (n = 526). INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR A bespoke smoking cessation (BSC) package for people with severe mental illness offered up to 12 individual sessions with a mental health smoking cessation practitioner versus usual care (UC). Of the participants who were randomized, 261 were in UC group and 265 were in BSC group. MEASUREMENTS BSC intervention cost was estimated from the treatment log. Costs of UC, health-care and social services and EQ-5D-5 L were collected at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Incremental costs and incremental QLAYs were estimated using regression adjusting for respective baseline values and other baseline covariates. FINDINGS The mean total cost in the BSC group was £270 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -£1690 to £1424] lower than in the UC group, while the mean QALYs were 0.013 (95% CI = -0.008 to 0.045) higher, leading to BSC dominating UC (76% probability of cost-effective at £20 000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS A bespoke smoking cessation package for people with severe mental illness is likely to be cost-effective over 12 months compared with usual care provided by the UK's National Health Service and personal social services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinshuo Li
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catherine Arundel
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Paul Heron
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Suzanne Crosland
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Manning D, Butler T, Butler M, Majeed Y, Gordon R, Qadir G, Kazi S, Beynon R, Appaji A, Patwala A, Bailey D, Satchithananda D. Estimated population prevalence of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis in elderly men derived from incidental cardiac uptake from routine bone scans – “we're going to need a bigger boat”. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
Transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR) is a cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy and heart failure predominantly in elderly men. Two main factors have moved TTR amyloidosis from super-specialist centres into mainstream cardiology:
We aimed to determine the potential magnitude of referrals to our embryonic cardiac TTR service from patients having routine bone scans for non-cardiac reasons. We planned to estimate the prevalence of cardiac TTR in our local over 65 male population to plan service provision.
Methods
All HDP bone scans performed at a teaching and research hospital in the UK from the 2017/18 financial year were reviewed (n=1530). Our hospital is the only provider of these scans locally. Of these, 1399 were for oncological and musculoskeletal (oncology/MSK) indications and 37 were referred to specifically “exclude amyloidosis”. We excluded paediatric and duplicate follow-up imaging. There are approximately 140,000 people over aged 65 living within our catchment region. We have assumed approximately 50% are male.
Results
Myocardial uptake was present in 7/1399 of the oncology/MSK group and 3/7 (43%) of these already had features of heart failure. In these 7 patients bone scans were performed to investigate bony metastases in 6 (1 oesophageal cancer and 5 for prostate cancer) and 1 following an orthopaedic procedure. Cardiac uptake was present in 10/37 of the “exclude amyloid” group. In those with cardiac uptake across both groups (17) 94% were male with a mean age of 83 (sd ±6.59) and 41% were from the oncology/musculoskeletal group. Incidental cardiac uptake was seen in 1:200 routine HDP scans. When looking at males >65 specifically the uptake rate increases to (6 out of 701 scans) i.e. 1:117. Assuming there is no increased risk of TTR in patients with prostate or oesophageal cancer, then an estimate of cardiac TTR in the 75,000 males over the age of 65 locally would be approximately 640 men.
Conclusions
Bone scans account for 41% of all HDP scans with incidental cardiac uptake and therefore represents a significant potential referral source for a cardiac amyloid service. Our data suggests a potential prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis in 1:117 men over 65 with 43% already having heart failure symptoms and signs. Our age and sex specific prevalence suggests cardiac TTR is neither a rare nor unusual diagnosis. We will use our prevalence estimate to ensure our cardiac TTR service is resourced appropriately. We suggest that cardiac amyloid and cardio-oncology services should include pathways incorporating rapid access routes for suitable patients with incidental cardiac uptake on bone scans performed by non-cardiologists.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Manning
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - T Butler
- Student, Stoke-On-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - M Butler
- Student, Stoke-On-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Y Majeed
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - R Gordon
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - G Qadir
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - S Kazi
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - R Beynon
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - A Appaji
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - A Patwala
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - D Bailey
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Arundel CE, Peckham E, Bailey D, Crosland S, Heron P, Gilbody S. Challenges and solutions to nicotine replacement therapy access: observations from SCIMITAR. BJPsych Open 2020; 6:e120. [PMID: 33054882 PMCID: PMC7576667 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2020.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given that smoking results in poor physical and mental health, reducing tobacco harm is of high importance. Recommendations published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to reduce smoking harms included provision of support, use of nicotine containing products and commissioning of smoking cessation services. AIMS This report explores the difficulties in obtaining such support, as observed in a recently conducted randomised controlled trial in patients with severe mental ill health, and outlines suggestions to improve facilitation of provision. METHOD Data collected during the Smoking Cessation Intervention for Severe Mental Ill Health Trial (SCIMITAR+) (trial Registration ISRCTN72955454), was reviewed to identify the difficulties experienced, across the trial, with regards to access and provision of nicotine replacements therapy (NRT). Actions taken to facilitate access and provision of NRT were collated to outline how provision could be better facilitated. RESULTS Access to NRT varied across study settings and in some instances proved impossible for patients to access. Difficulty in access was irrespective of a diagnosis of severe mental ill health. Where NRT was provided, this was not always provided in accordance with NICE guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Availability of smoking cessation support, and NRT provision would benefit from being made clearer, simpler and more easily accessible so as to enhance smoking cessation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | | | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peckham E, Arundel C, Bailey D, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Heron P, Hewitt C, Li J, Parrott S, Bradshaw T, Horspool M, Hughes E, Hughes T, Ker S, Leahy M, McCloud T, Osborn D, Reilly J, Steare T, Ballantyne E, Bidwell P, Bonner S, Brennan D, Callen T, Carey A, Colbeck C, Coton D, Donaldson E, Evans K, Herlihy H, Khan W, Nyathi L, Nyamadzawo E, Oldknow H, Phiri P, Rathod S, Rea J, Romain-Hooper CB, Smith K, Stribling A, Vickers C, Gilbody S. A bespoke smoking cessation service compared with treatment as usual for people with severe mental ill health: the SCIMITAR+ RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-116. [PMID: 31549622 DOI: 10.3310/hta23500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a high prevalence of smoking among people with severe mental ill health (SMI). Helping people with SMI to quit smoking could improve their health and longevity, and reduce health inequalities. However, those with SMI are less likely to access and engage with routine smoking cessation services than the general population. OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a bespoke smoking cessation (BSC) intervention with usual stop smoking services for people with SMI. DESIGN A pragmatic, two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial. SETTING Primary care and secondary care mental health services in England. PARTICIPANTS Smokers aged ≥ 18 years with SMI who would like to cut down on or quit smoking. INTERVENTIONS A BSC intervention delivered by mental health specialists trained to deliver evidence-supported smoking cessation interventions compared with usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was self-reported, CO-verified smoking cessation at 12 months. Smoking-related secondary outcomes were self-reported smoking cessation, the number of cigarettes smoked per day, the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and the Motivation to Quit questionnaire. Other secondary outcomes were Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items, Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 items and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, to assess mental health and body mass index measured at 6 and 12 months post randomisation. RESULTS The trial randomised 526 people (265 to the intervention group, 261 to the usual-care group) aged 19 to 72 years (mean 46 years). About 60% of participants were male. Participants smoked between 3 and 100 cigarettes per day (mean 25 cigarettes per day) at baseline. The intervention group had a higher rate of exhaled CO-verified smoking cessation at 6 and 12 months than the usual-care group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 12 months: 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 2.8; adjusted OR 6 months: 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.7]. This was not statistically significant at 12 months (p = 0.12) but was statistically significant at 6 months (p = 0.01). In total, 111 serious adverse events were reported (69 in the BSC group and 42 in the usual-care group); the majority were unplanned hospitalisations due to a deterioration in mental health (n = 98). The intervention is likely (57%) to be less costly but more effective than usual care; however, this result was not necessarily associated with participants' smoking status. LIMITATIONS Follow-up was not blind to treatment allocation. However, the primary outcome included a biochemically verified end point, less susceptible to observer biases. Some participants experienced difficulties in accessing nicotine replacement therapy because of changes in service provision. Efforts were made to help participants access nicotine replacement therapy, but this may have affected participants' quit attempt. CONCLUSIONS People with SMI who received the intervention were more likely to have stopped smoking at 6 months. Although more people who received the intervention had stopped smoking at 12 months, this was not statistically significant. FUTURE WORK Further research is needed to establish how quitting can be sustained among people with SMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN72955454. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 50. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim Bradshaw
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Horspool
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Tom Hughes
- Research and Development, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- North East York Community Mental Health Team, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Moira Leahy
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph Reilly
- North East York Community Mental Health Team, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Thomas Steare
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Ballantyne
- Research and Development, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Polly Bidwell
- Research and Development, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Susan Bonner
- Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton on Tees, UK
| | - Diane Brennan
- Research and Development, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sleaford, UK
| | - Tracy Callen
- Research and Development, Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Alex Carey
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charlotte Colbeck
- Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Debbie Coton
- Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | - Emma Donaldson
- Research and Development, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Kimberley Evans
- Research and Development, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Hannah Herlihy
- Research and Development, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | - Wajid Khan
- Research and Development, South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Lizwi Nyathi
- Research and Development, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sleaford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Nyamadzawo
- Research and Development, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Helen Oldknow
- Research and Development, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jamie Rea
- Research and Development, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Kaye Smith
- Research and Development, Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Alison Stribling
- Research and Development, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carinna Vickers
- Research and Development, Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, South Petherton, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bailey D, Wijayatunga N, Klobodu S, Knight K, Dhurandhar E. The Association of Weight Bias with Health At Every Size® Alignment and Weight Bias Training in a Nationally Representative Sample of Registered Dietitians. J Acad Nutr Diet 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.06.247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
26
|
Peckham E, Mishu M, Fairhurst C, Robson D, Bradshaw T, Arundel C, Bailey D, Heron P, Ker S, Gilbody S. E-cigarette use and associated factors among smokers with severe mental illness. Addict Behav 2020; 108:106456. [PMID: 32388396 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smoking is more prevalent among people with severe mental illness (SMI) than the general population. E-cigarettes could provide an effective means of helping people to quit smoking. The aim of this paper is to explore the use of e-cigarettes and factors related to their use in people smokers with SMI. METHODS This is a cross sectional study including adult smokers with a documented diagnosis of SMI (ICD-10) recruited to the SCIMITAR + trial (2015-2016) from primary and secondary care. At baseline, participants were asked for demographic information and about their use of e-cigarettes. Data was were analysed to explore factors associated with e-cigarette use. After testing bivariate associations, logistic regressions were conducted. RESULTS Among 526 participants, 58.7% were male, mean age 46 years (SD 12.1), the majority (70.3%) had tried an e-cigarette. Among those who had ever tried an e-cigarette, over half (54.6%) reported the reason was to quit smoking, while 13.9% reported that the reason was to reduce smoking. Having an educational qualification of GCSE or higher (odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.86, p = 0.008) and having made a quit attempt in the past six months (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.63, p = 0.032) was associated with ever having tried an e-cigarette. CONCLUSIONS Ever use of an e-cigarette was associated with education levels and recent quit attempts. Future trials could explore the effectiveness of e-cigarettes as a cessation aid in this participant group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Masuma Mishu
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Deborah Robson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King'S College London, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Tim Bradshaw
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Catherine Arundel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Huntington, York YO32 9XW, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bailey D, Bruno L, Schwartz Cohen J. Check in With Chicken: Novel Development and Delivery of a Nutrition Communications Program at a National Food and Nutrition Meeting. J Acad Nutr Diet 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.06.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Arundel C, Coleman E, Fairhurst C, Peckham E, Bailey D, Gilbody S. The effectiveness of a contingent financial incentive to improve trial follow up; a randomised study within a trial (SWAT). F1000Res 2019; 8:1937. [PMID: 32742637 PMCID: PMC7372525 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21059.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a contingent financial incentive (£10 note in addition to a routinely provided £10 voucher) versus no contingent financial incentive, on improving the retention rate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Methods A two arm 'Study within a Trial' (SWAT) embedded within a host RCT (SCIMITAR+). Participants were randomised to the SWAT using a 2:1 (intervention:control) allocation ratio. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants completing a CO breath measurement at the first SCIMITAR+ follow up time point (6 months). Secondary outcomes were withdrawing from follow-up after contact and time from assessment due date to completion. Analyses were conducted using logistic or Cox Proportional Hazards regression as appropriate. Results A total of 434 participants were randomised into this SWAT. Completion of the CO breath measurement at 6 months was 88.5% (n=247) in the intervention arm of the SWAT and 85.4% (n=123) in the control arm (Difference 3.1%, OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.71-2.33, p=0.41). There was also no evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants withdrawing from follow-up after contact (intervention n=7 (2.5%), control n=5 (3.5%); OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.23-2.44, p=0.64), nor in terms of proximity of 6-month visit completion to due date (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86-1.33, p=0.55). Conclusion It is unclear if contingent financial incentives increased rates of face-to-face follow-up completion within the SCIMITAR+ trial population. However, the sample size of this SWAT was constrained by the size of the host trial and power was limited. This SWAT adds to the body of evidence for initiatives to increase response rates in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Arundel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coleman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Arundel C, Coleman E, Fairhurst C, Peckham E, Bailey D, Gilbody S. SCIMITAR+ Trial: A randomised study within a trial (SWAT) of a contingent financial reward to improve trial follow-up. F1000Res 2019; 8:1937. [PMID: 32742637 PMCID: PMC7372525 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21059.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 03/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of a contingent financial incentive (£10 note in addition to a routinely provided £10 voucher) versus no contingent financial incentive, on improving the retention rate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Methods: A two arm 'Study within a Trial' (SWAT) embedded within a host RCT (SCIMITAR+). Participants were randomised to the SWAT using a 2:1 (intervention:control) allocation ratio. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants completing a CO breath measurement at the first SCIMITAR+ follow up time point (6 months). Secondary outcomes were withdrawing from follow-up after contact and time from assessment due date to completion. Analyses were conducted using logistic or Cox Proportional Hazards regression as appropriate. Results: A total of 434 participants were randomised into this SWAT. Completion of the CO breath measurement at 6 months was 88.5% (n=247) in the intervention arm of the SWAT and 85.4% (n=123) in the control arm. The difference (3.1%) was not statistically significant (p=0.36; OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.71-2.33, p=0.41). There was also no evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants withdrawing from follow-up after contact (intervention n=7 (2.5%), control n=5 (3.5%); OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.23-2.44, p=0.64), nor in terms of proximity of 6-month visit completion to due date (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86-1.33, p=0.55). Conclusion: Contingent financial incentives did not statistically significantly increase rates of face-to-face follow-up completion within the SCIMITAR+ trial population. However, the sample size of this SWAT was constrained by the size of the host trial and power was limited. This SWAT adds to the body of evidence for initiatives to increase response rates in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Arundel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coleman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lim L, Chan D, Thomas D, Wyld D, Cehic G, Macdonald W, Du Y, Tincknell G, Kuchel A, Pavlakis N, Bailey D, Davis A, Segelov E. An Australian multi-centre experience of the use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for bronchial carcinoid tumours. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz256.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
31
|
Heron P, McCloud T, Arundel C, Bailey D, Ker S, Li J, Mishu M, Osborn D, Parrott S, Peckham E, Stribling A, Gilbody S. Standard smoking cessation services in sites participating in the SCIMITAR+ trial for people with severe mental ill health. BJPsych Bull 2019; 44:6-11. [PMID: 31162002 DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2019.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims and methodThe SCIMITAR+ trial was commissioned to evaluate the effectiveness of a bespoke smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental ill health compared with usual services. It is difficult to define what constitutes usual care in smoking cessation services. We aimed to define what this was during the trial. Twenty-two National Health Service healthcare providers participated in a bespoke survey asking about usual care in their area. RESULTS: All sites offered smoking cessation support; however, service provider and service type varied substantially. In some cases services were not streamlined, meaning that people received smoking cessation counselling from one organisation and smoking cessation medication from another.Clinical implicationsTo better implement the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline PH48, clearer referral pathways need to be implemented and communicated to patients, staff and carers. People with severe mental ill health need to be able to access services that combine nicotine replacement therapy and behavioural support in a streamlined manner.Declaration of interestNone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Heron
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK
| | | | - Della Bailey
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- Huntington House Mental Health Resource Centre, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jinshuo Li
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| | - Masuma Mishu
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| | - Alison Stribling
- Windsor Research Unit, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Littlewood E, Ali S, Badenhorst J, Bailey D, Bambra C, Chew-Graham C, Coleman E, Crosland S, Gascoyne S, Gilbody S, Hewitt C, Jones C, Keding A, Kitchen C, McMillan D, Pearson C, Rhodes S, Sloan C, Todd A, Watson M, Whittlesea C, Ekers D. Community Pharmacies Mood Intervention Study (CHEMIST): feasibility and external pilot randomised controlled trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:71. [PMID: 31161045 PMCID: PMC6540405 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0457-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
FEASIBILITY STUDY Objectives:Refine a bespoke enhanced support intervention (ESI) (including self-help materials, intervention manual and training) for implementation by community pharmacy (CP) staff to people with sub-threshold depression and long-term conditions (LTCs) based upon evidence-supported interventions in primary careDevelop and refine study procedures (recruitment strategies and set up, screening, participant recruitment, assessment, suitability of outcome measures and data collection procedures) for testing in the pilot study phaseDesign: A case series/qualitative studySetting: UK community pharmacyPopulation: Adults with long-term health conditions who screen-positive for depression but who do not reach the threshold for DSM IV Moderate Depressive disorderIntervention: Enhanced support intervention (ESI) delivered by an appropriately trained community pharmacy team member involving four to six sessions over four months. ESI is a modified form of an intervention within the collaborative care framework for sub-threshold depression validated in previous studies in UK primary care which appears suitable for implementation in community settings.Sample size: 20-30 participantsOutcomes: Study implementation (recruitment and attrition rates), quality of data collection at baseline and 4 months and ESI adherence (number of contacts, DNA and drop out) as per objectives 1a/bQualitative evaluation: Semi-structured interviews with up to 10 participants and ESI facilitators and focus group(s) (range of pharmacy staff n = 8-10) will be conducted to explore the acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of the study, training and study procedures. EXTERNAL PILOT STUDY Objectives:Quantify the flow of participants (eligibility, recruitment and follow-up rate)Evaluate proposed recruitment, assessment and outcome measure collection methodsExamine the delivery of the enhanced support intervention in a community pharmacy setting (intervention uptake, retention and dose) to inform process evaluationProcess evaluation, using semi-structured interviews with participants across a range of socio-economic settings, and pharmacy staff to explore the acceptability of the ESI within community pharmacy, elements of the intervention that were considered useful (or not) and appropriateness of study proceduresDesign: Pilot randomised controlled trial, including a prospective economic and qualitative evaluationSetting: As abovePopulation: As aboveIntervention: As above with adaptations post feasibility studyComparator: Usual careSample size: 100 participantsOutcomes: Data will be used to estimate recruitment, intervention delivery and study completion rates as per objectives 2a-d. Definitive estimates of the effectiveness of ESI will not be made.Primary outcome: Depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire 9) at four months.Secondary outcomes: Patient acceptance, uptake and attrition. ICD10 depression status, anxiety (GAD 7), health-related quality of life (SF-12v2) and health-state utility (EQ5D 3L) will be measured at four months.Economic evaluation: The incremental cost per QALY will be calculated from both the NHS and societal perspective.Process evaluation: Using mixed methods, potential mediators/moderators of the intervention, the acceptability (to participants and pharmacy staff), barriers and facilitators to the use of ESI in community pharmacy, and impact on usual practice will be examined. Semi-structured interviews with approximately 30 study participants, 20 pharmacy staff and eight GPs near participating pharmacies will be conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: ISRCTN11290592Protocol version number: Version 4.1 (dated 16th January 2018)Study Sponsor Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Jay Badenhorst
- Whitworth Chemists Ltd, 2C Atkinson Way, Foxhill Industrial Estate, Scunthorpe, DN15 8QJ UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Clare Bambra
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Carolyn Chew-Graham
- Research Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Elizabeth Coleman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Suzanne Crosland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Samantha Gascoyne
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Claire Jones
- Public Health Team, Children & Adult Services, Durham County Council, County Hall, DH1 5UJ UK
| | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Charlotte Kitchen
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Caroline Pearson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Shelley Rhodes
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Adam Todd
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
- School of Pharmacy, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK
| | - Michelle Watson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Cate Whittlesea
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX UK
| | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
- Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT/University of York, Tarncroft House, Lanchester Road Hospital, Durham, DH1 5RD UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Purgato M, Carswell K, Acarturk C, Au T, Akbai S, Anttila M, Baumgartner J, Bailey D, Biondi M, Bird M, Churchill R, Eskici S, Hansen LJ, Heron P, Ilkkursun Z, Kilian R, Koesters M, Lantta T, Nosè M, Ostuzzi G, Papola D, Popa M, Sijbrandij M, Tarsitani L, Tedeschi F, Turrini G, Uygun E, Välimäki MA, Wancata J, White R, Zanini E, Cuijpers P, Barbui C, Van Ommeren M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+) for preventing mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers in Europe and Turkey: study protocols for two randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030259. [PMID: 31092670 PMCID: PMC6530324 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article describes two randomised controlled trials that will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+), a group self-help intervention developed by the WHO to reduce distress. In these trials SH+ is being tested as a preventative intervention to lower the incidence of mental disorders in asylum seekers and refugees with psychological distress resettled in Europe and Turkey. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Two prospective, multicentre, randomised, rater-blinded, parallel-group studies will follow participants over a period of 12 months. One trial will be conducted in Europe and one in Turkey. In each trial, 600 asylum seekers and refugees screening positive on the General Health Questionnaire (≥3), but without a formal diagnosis of any mental disorders according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, will be randomly allocated to SH+or to enhanced treatment-as-usual. The primary outcome will be a lower incidence of mental disorders at 6 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include the evaluation of psychological symptoms, functioning, well-being, treatment acceptability and indicators of intervention cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The two trials received ethical clearance from the local Ethics Committees of the participating sites (seven sites), as well as from the WHO Ethics Committee. All participants will provide informed consent before screening and before study inclusion (a two-step procedure). The results of the trials will be disseminated in agreement with a dissemination plan that includes publication(s) in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant national and international conferences and meetings. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT03571347, NCT03587896.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Purgato
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
| | - Kenneth Carswell
- Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse, World Health Organisation, Geneve, Switzerland
| | | | - Teresa Au
- Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse, World Health Organisation, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Sena Akbai
- Department of Psychology, Istanbul Sehir Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Josef Baumgartner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Massimo Biondi
- Department of Human Neurosciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Martha Bird
- IFRC Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, Danish Red Cross, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Sevde Eskici
- Department of Psychology, Istanbul Sehir Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Louise Juul Hansen
- IFRC Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, Danish Red Cross, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Zeynep Ilkkursun
- Department of Psychology, Istanbul Sehir Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Markus Koesters
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, Turun Yliopisto, Turku, Finland
| | - Michela Nosè
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ostuzzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Papola
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
| | - Mariana Popa
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Lorenzo Tarsitani
- Department of Human Neurosciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Turrini
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
| | - Ersin Uygun
- Trauma and Disaster Mental Health, Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maritta Anneli Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Johannes Wancata
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ross White
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Elisa Zanini
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrado Barbui
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, Verona, Italy
| | - Mark Van Ommeren
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gilbody S, Peckham E, Bailey D, Arundel C, Heron P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Li J, Parrott S, Bradshaw T, Horspool M, Hughes E, Hughes T, Ker S, Leahy M, McCloud T, Osborn D, Reilly J, Steare T, Ballantyne E, Bidwell P, Bonner S, Brennan D, Callen T, Carey A, Colbeck C, Coton D, Donaldson E, Evans K, Herlihy H, Khan W, Nyathi L, Nyamadzawo E, Oldknow H, Phiri P, Rathod S, Rea J, Romain-Hooper CB, Smith K, Stribling A, Vickers C. Smoking cessation for people with severe mental illness (SCIMITAR+): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6:379-390. [PMID: 30975539 PMCID: PMC6546931 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30047-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia are three times more likely to smoke than the wider population, contributing to widening health inequalities. Smoking remains the largest modifiable risk factor for this health inequality, but people with severe mental illness have not historically engaged with smoking cessation services. We aimed to test the effectiveness of a combined behavioural and pharmacological smoking cessation intervention targeted specifically at people with severe mental illness. METHODS In the smoking cessation intervention for severe mental illness (SCIMITAR+) trial, a pragmatic, randomised controlled study, we recruited heavy smokers with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia from 16 primary care and 21 community-based mental health sites in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, and smoked at least five cigarettes per day. Exclusion criteria included substantial comorbid drug or alcohol problems and people who lacked capacity to consent at the time of recruitment. Using computer-generated random numbers, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a bespoke smoking cessation intervention or to usual care. Participants, mental health specialists, and primary care physicians were unmasked to assignment. The bespoke smoking cessation intervention consisted of behavioural support from a mental health smoking cessation practitioner and pharmacological aids for smoking cessation, with adaptations for people with severe mental illness-such as, extended pre-quit sessions, cut down to quit, and home visits. Access to pharmacotherapy was via primary care after discussion with the smoking cessation specialist. Under usual care participants were offered access to local smoking cessation services not specifically designed for people with severe mental illnesses. The primary endpoint was smoking cessation at 12 months ascertained via carbon monoxide measurements below 10 parts per million and self-reported cessation for the past 7 days. Secondary endpoints were biologically verified smoking cessation at 6 months; number of cigarettes smoked per day, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and Motivation to Quit (MTQ) questionnaire; general and mental health functioning determined via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12); and body-mass index (BMI). This trial was registerd with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN72955454, and is complete. FINDINGS Between Oct 7, 2015, and Dec 16, 2016, 526 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the bespoke smoking cessation intervention (n=265) or usual care (n=261). 309 (59%) participants were male, median age was 47·2 years (IQR 36·3-54·5), with high nicotine dependence (mean 24 cigarettes per day [SD 13·2]), and the most common severe mental disorders were schizophrenia or other psychotic illness (n=343 [65%]), bipolar disorder (n=115 [22%]), and schizoaffective disorder (n=66 [13%]). 234 (88%) of intervention participants engaged with the treatment programme and attended 6·4 (SD 3·5) quit smoking sessions, with an average duration of 39 min (SD 17; median 35 min, range 5-120). Verified quit data at 12 months were available for 219 (84%) of 261 usual care and 223 (84%) of 265 intervention participants. The proportion of participants who had quit at 12 months was higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group, but non-significantly (34 [15%] of 223 [13% of those assigned to group] vs 22 [10%] of 219 [8% of those assigned to group], risk difference 5·2%, 95% CI -1·0 to 11·4; odds ratio [OR] 1·6, 95% CI 0·9 to 2·9; p=0·10). The proportion of participants who quit at 6 months was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group (32 [14%] of 226 vs 14 [6%] of 217; risk difference 7·7%, 95% CI 2·1 to 13·3; OR 2·4, 95% CI 1·2 to 4·6; p=0·010). The incidence rate ratio for number of cigarettes smoked per day at 6 months was 0·90 (95% CI 0·80 to 1·01; p=0·079), and at 12 months was 1·00 (0·89 to 1·13; p=0·95). At both 6 months and 12 months, the intervention group was non-significantly favoured in the FTND (adjusted mean difference 6 months -0·18, 95% CI -0·53 to 0·17, p=0·32; and 12 months -0·01, -0·39 to 0·38, p=0·97) and MTQ questionnaire (adjusted mean difference 0·58, -0·01 to 1·17, p=0·056; and 12 months 0·64, 0·04 to 1·24, p=0·038). The PHQ-9 showed no difference between the groups (adjusted mean difference at 6 months 0·20, 95% CI -0·85 to 1·24 vs 12 months -0·12, -1·18 to 0·94). For the SF-12 survey, we saw evidence of improvement in physical health in the intervention group at 6 months (adjusted mean difference 1·75, 95% CI 0·21 to 3·28), but this difference was not evident at 12 months (0·59, -1·07 to 2·26); and we saw no difference in mental health between the groups at 6 or 12 months (adjusted mean difference at 6 months -0·73, 95% CI -2·82 to 1·36, and 12 months -0·41, -2·35 to 1·53). The GAD-7 questionnaire showed no difference between the groups (adjusted mean difference at 6 months -0·32 95% CI -1·26 to 0·62 vs 12 months -0·10, -1·05 to 0·86). No difference in BMI was seen between the groups (adjusted mean difference 6 months 0·16, 95% CI -0·54 to 0·85; 12 months 0·25, -0·62 to 1·13). INTERPRETATION This bespoke intervention is a candidate model of smoking cessation for clinicians and policy makers to address high prevalence of smoking. The incidence of quitting at 6 months shows that smoking cessation can be achieved, but the waning of this effect by 12 months means more effort is needed for sustained quitting. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Paul Heron
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tim Bradshaw
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Horspool
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Tom Hughes
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Moira Leahy
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joe Reilly
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Thomas Steare
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Ballantyne
- Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | | | - Sue Bonner
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Diane Brennan
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Alex Carey
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charlotte Colbeck
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Debbie Coton
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | | | | | - Hannah Herlihy
- Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | - Wajid Khan
- South West Yorkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Lizwi Nyathi
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Helen Oldknow
- Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Jamie Rea
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Kaye Smith
- Solent NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Carinna Vickers
- Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, South Petherton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Back M, Jayamanne D, Brazier D, Newey A, Bailey D, Schembri G, Hsiao E, Khasraw M, Wong M, Kastelan M, Brown C, Wheeler H. Pattern of failure in anaplastic glioma patients with an IDH1/2 mutation. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 196:31-39. [PMID: 31028406 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01467-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The current study aimed to assess patterns of failure (PoF) in anaplastic glioma (AG) patients managed with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and their relationship to molecular subtype. METHODS The outcomes of AG patients managed between 2008 and 2014 and entered into a prospective database were assessed, including PoF. AG was initially defined using the WHO 2007 classification, but for analysis, patients were subsequently recategorised based on WHO 2016 as anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AOD), astrocytoma isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant (AAmut) or astrocytoma IDH wildtype (AAwt). Management involved IMRT and temozolomide (TMZ), including from 2011 patients with an IDH mutation (IDHmut) planned with 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET). PoF was local, marginal or distant in relation to the IMRT volume. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the start of IMRT. RESULTS A total of 156 patients were assessed, with median follow-up of 5.1 years. Of these patients, 75% were IDHmut, 44% were managed at first or later relapse and 73% received TMZ. Relapse occurred in 68 patients, with 6‑year RFS of 75.0, 48.8 and 2.5% for AOD, AAmut and AAwt, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a component of local relapse in 63%, of marginal relapse in 19% and of distant relapse in 37% of relapses. Isolated local, marginal and distant relapse was evident in 51, 9 and 22%, respectively. A distant relapse pattern was more frequent in IDHmut compared to IDHwt patients (26% vs. 45%, p = 0.005), especially within the first 2 years post-IMRT. In multivariate analysis, distant relapse remained associated with AAmut (p < 0.002) and delayed IMRT until the second relapse (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Although patients with IDH-mutated AG have improved outcomes, there was a higher proportion of distant relapses occurring during the 2 years after IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia.
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia.
- Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, Australia.
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia.
| | - D Jayamanne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia
| | - D Brazier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Newey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - G Schembri
- The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - E Hsiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Khasraw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Wong
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia
| | - M Kastelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - H Wheeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards Sydney NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sellon E, Durdle S, Bailey D. Assessing the utility of ultrasound in the role 2 hospital setting. BMJ Mil Health 2019; 167:323-326. [PMID: 31005886 DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2019-001208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The usefulness of departmental diagnostic ultrasound in the role 2 setting has not been previously evaluated. This is because role 2 hospital manning does not traditionally include a diagnostic radiologist. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of this added capability in the deployed role 2 hospital setting. METHODS Prospective data were collected using a questionnaire alongside each scan request during the Op TRENTON 3 operational period. This included details of clinical indication and presumptive diagnosis. Scans were acquired and reported as part of routine care. The postscan clinical diagnosis and effect on management plan were determined by the treating clinician and recorded on the questionnaire. Point-of-care and focused assessment with sonography in trauma scans were excluded, as were ultrasound-guided interventional procedures. RESULTS 41 diagnostic departmental scans were included over the six-month period. 68% (28/41) of the scans increased clinical confidence in the management plan, while 29% (12/41) led to an alteration in the management plan. Only one examination (3%) was deemed to have had no clinical impact. Overall, the musculoskeletal scans had the greatest impact on patient management. CONCLUSIONS Constraints of manoeuvrability at role 2 currently preclude the availability of body CT and shift the demand for diagnostic soft tissue imaging to ultrasound. This capability is only possible with the deployment of suitably trained individuals. This study highlights the utility of this capability at role 2. Musculoskeletal ultrasound skills were of particular value, and training should be encouraged among physiotherapists and radiographers in lieu of, where necessary, a suitably trained deployable radiologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Sellon
- Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Durdle
- Radiology Department, 33 Field Hospital, Gosport, UK
| | - D Bailey
- Radiology Department, 306 Hospital Support Regiment, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dastaran M, Bailey D, Austin S, Chandu A, Judge R. Complications of augmentation procedures for dental implants in private practice, Victoria, Australia. Aust Dent J 2019; 64:223-228. [PMID: 30883798 DOI: 10.1111/adj.12686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study audited complications associated with augmentation for dental implants, retrospectively over a 5-year period in a variety of private dental practices in Victoria (Australia). METHODS Complications were categorized as surgical or biological and compared to a group not requiring augmentation. Implant factors underwent univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS The study assessed 8486 implants with 26.9% undergoing augmentation. Augmentation had no effect on implant survival, however, a significant increase in complications for those implants requiring augmentation was found (P = <0.001). The hard tissue augmented group had significantly more cases of insufficient bone/dehiscences at implant placement (P < 0.001), and post-placement bone loss (P = 0.0014). These implants were grafted simultaneously (P < 0.05) with particulate autogenous bone and/or Bio-Oss (P < 0.05) with resorbable xenograft membrane (P < 0.001). There was significantly more bone loss in open sinus lifted cases than implants placed in native bone (1.90% v 0.30%; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated no increase in graft complications that could be related to any specific augmentation technique, suggesting that routine grafting procedures used in private practice were safe and appropriate. Previously augmented sites were found to be more likely to require further augmentation at implant placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dastaran
- Victoria and Tasmania Oral & Maxillofacial Training Programme, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Bailey
- Oral Health Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Chair, eviDent Foundation, Australian Dental Council (ADC), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Austin
- Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Western Hospital Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Chandu
- Nu Dastaran- Specialist Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon- Royal Melbourne Hospital and Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Judge
- Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hollins JPW, Thambithurai D, Van Leeuwen TE, Allan B, Koeck B, Bailey D, Killen SS. Shoal familiarity modulates effects of individual metabolism on vulnerability to capture by trawling. Conserv Physiol 2019; 7:coz043. [PMID: 31380110 PMCID: PMC6661965 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coz043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Impacts of fisheries-induced evolution may extend beyond life history traits to more cryptic aspects of biology, such as behaviour and physiology. Understanding roles of physiological traits in determining individual susceptibility to capture in fishing gears and how these mechanisms change across contexts is essential to evaluate the capacity of commercial fisheries to elicit phenotypic change in exploited populations. Previous work has shown that metabolic traits related to anaerobic swimming may determine individual susceptibility to capture in trawls, with fish exhibiting higher anaerobic performance more likely to evade capture. However, high densities of fish aggregated ahead of a trawl net may exacerbate the role of social interactions in determining an individual fish's behaviour and likelihood of capture, yet the role of social environment in modulating relationships between individual physiological traits and vulnerability to capture in trawls remains unknown. By replicating the final moments of capture in a trawl using shoals of wild minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus), we investigated the role of individual metabolic traits in determining susceptibility to capture among shoals of both familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics. We expected that increased shoal cohesion and conformity of behaviour in shoals of familiar fish would lessen the role of individual metabolic traits in determining susceptibility to capture. However, the opposite pattern was observed, with individual fish exhibiting high anaerobic capacity less vulnerable to capture in the trawl net, but only when tested alongside familiar conspecifics. This pattern is likely due to stronger cohesion within familiar shoals, where maintaining a minimal distance from conspecifics, and thus staying ahead of the net, becomes limited by individual anaerobic swim performance. In contrast, lower shoal cohesion and synchronicity of behaviours within unfamiliar shoals may exacerbate the role of stochastic processes in determining susceptibility to capture, disrupting relationships between individual metabolic traits and vulnerability to capture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P W Hollins
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
- Corresponding author: Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
| | - D Thambithurai
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - T E Van Leeuwen
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Salmonid Section, 80 East White Hills Road, PO Box 5667, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1C 5X1, Canada
- Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland A1C 5S7, Canada
| | - B Allan
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - B Koeck
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - D Bailey
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - S S Killen
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pierce C, Bailey D, Medrano J, Cánovas A, Speidel S, Coleman S, Enns R, Thomas M. 283 Validation of Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Grazing Distribution Traits in Beef Cattle Using Bayes C. J Anim Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky404.232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C Pierce
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - D Bailey
- Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University,Las Cruces, NM, United States
| | - J Medrano
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis,Davis, CA, United States
| | - A Cánovas
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph,Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - S Speidel
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - S Coleman
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - R Enns
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - M Thomas
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Herron E, Murray M, Hilton L, Goldstein T, Ogunleye T, Bailey D. Surface Guided Radiation Therapy as a Replacement for Patient Marks in Treatment of Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.1400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
41
|
Murden F, Bailey D, Mackenzie F, Oeppen RS, Brennan PA. The impact and effect of emotional resilience on performance: an overview for surgeons and other healthcare professionals. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 56:786-790. [PMID: 30220608 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Medicine and surgery can be demanding professions with high levels of burnout, but few healthcare professionals are given training or education in the management of stress, and the ability of individuals to cope with work and other pressures is often taken for granted. Emotional resilience - the ability to recover from a stressful event, whether at work or at home - is influenced by factors that are both within and outside our control. In this review, we provide an overview of emotional resilience for surgeons and other healthcare professionals, and focus on the factors that can be modulated to help us cope with difficult or complex situations. We also discuss the importance of teamwork and camaraderie, which can easily be forgotten in busy working practice. A greater awareness and understanding of emotional resilience and ways to cope with stress and pressure at work are essential if we are to look after ourselves better, improve the work of our teams, and provide the best care for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Murden
- Aroka Ltd, Tunbridge-Wells, Kent TN3 0XJ
| | - D Bailey
- Maxillofacial Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK
| | - F Mackenzie
- Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH
| | - R S Oeppen
- University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - P A Brennan
- Maxillofacial Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bosanquet K, Adamson J, Atherton K, Bailey D, Baxter C, Beresford-Dent J, Birtwistle J, Chew-Graham C, Clare E, Delgadillo J, Ekers D, Foster D, Gabe R, Gascoyne S, Haley L, Hamilton J, Hargate R, Hewitt C, Holmes J, Keding A, Lewis H, McMillan D, Meer S, Mitchell N, Nutbrown S, Overend K, Parrott S, Pervin J, Richards DA, Spilsbury K, Torgerson D, Traviss-Turner G, Trépel D, Woodhouse R, Gilbody S. CollAborative care for Screen-Positive EldeRs with major depression (CASPER plus): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-252. [PMID: 29171379 DOI: 10.3310/hta21670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression in older adults is common and is associated with poor quality of life, increased morbidity and early mortality, and increased health and social care use. Collaborative care, a low-intensity intervention for depression that is shown to be effective in working-age adults, has not yet been evaluated in older people with depression who are managed in UK primary care. The CollAborative care for Screen-Positive EldeRs (CASPER) plus trial fills the evidence gap identified by the most recent guidelines on depression management. OBJECTIVES To establish the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for older adults with major depressive disorder in primary care. DESIGN A pragmatic, multicentred, two-arm, parallel, individually randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study. Participants were automatically randomised by computer, by the York Trials Unit Randomisation Service, on a 1 : 1 basis using simple unstratified randomisation after informed consent and baseline measures were collected. Blinding was not possible. SETTING Sixty-nine general practices in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS A total of 485 participants aged ≥ 65 years with major depressive disorder. INTERVENTIONS A low-intensity intervention of collaborative care, including behavioural activation, delivered by a case manager for an average of six sessions over 7-8 weeks, alongside usual general practitioner (GP) care. The control arm received only usual GP care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items score at 4 months post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures included depression severity and caseness at 12 and 18 months, the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, Short Form questionnaire-12 items, Patient Health Questionnaire-15 items, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 items, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 items, a medication questionnaire, objective data and adverse events. Participants were followed up at 12 and 18 months. RESULTS In total, 485 participants were randomised (collaborative care, n = 249; usual care, n = 236), with 390 participants (80%: collaborative care, 75%; usual care, 86%) followed up at 4 months, 358 participants (74%: collaborative care, 70%; usual care, 78%) followed up at 12 months and 344 participants (71%: collaborative care, 67%; usual care, 75%) followed up at 18 months. A total of 415 participants were included in primary analysis (collaborative care, n = 198; usual care, n = 217), which revealed a statistically significant effect in favour of collaborative care at the primary end point at 4 months [8.98 vs. 10.90 score points, mean difference 1.92 score points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 2.99 score points; p < 0.001], equivalent to a standard effect size of 0.34. However, treatment differences were not maintained in the longer term (at 12 months: 0.19 score points, 95% CI -0.92 to 1.29 score points; p = 0.741; at 18 months: < 0.01 score points, 95% CI -1.12 to 1.12 score points; p = 0.997). The study recorded details of all serious adverse events (SAEs), which consisted of 'unscheduled hospitalisation', 'other medically important condition' and 'death'. No SAEs were related to the intervention. Collaborative care showed a small but non-significant increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over the 18-month period, with a higher cost. Overall, the mean cost per incremental QALY for collaborative care compared with usual care was £26,016; however, for participants attending six or more sessions, collaborative care appears to represent better value for money (£9876/QALY). LIMITATIONS Study limitations are identified at different stages: design (blinding unfeasible, potential contamination), process (relatively low overall consent rate, differential attrition/retention rates) and analysis (no baseline health-care resource cost or secondary/social care data). CONCLUSION Collaborative care was effective for older people with case-level depression across a range of outcomes in the short term though the reduction in depression severity was not maintained over the longer term of 12 or 18 months. Participants who received six or more sessions of collaborative care did benefit substantially more than those who received fewer treatment sessions but this difference was not statistically significant. FUTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations for future research include investigating the longer-term effect of the intervention. Depression is a recurrent disorder and it would be useful to assess its impact on relapse and the prevention of future case-level depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45842879. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 67. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joy Adamson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Katie Atherton
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Carolyn Chew-Graham
- Research Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Emily Clare
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (Mental Health) North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jaime Delgadillo
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Primary Care Mental Health Service, Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Mental Health Research Group, Durham University, Durham, UK.,Research and Development Department, Tees, Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Deborah Foster
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Lesley Haley
- Research and Development Department, Tees, Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jahnese Hamilton
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (Mental Health) North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - John Holmes
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Helen Lewis
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Shaista Meer
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Sarah Nutbrown
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karen Overend
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jodi Pervin
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - David A Richards
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | | | - Dominic Trépel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Taylor AK, Gilbody S, Bosanquet K, Overend K, Bailey D, Foster D, Lewis H, Chew-Graham CA. How should we implement collaborative care for older people with depression? A qualitative study using normalisation process theory within the CASPER plus trial. BMC Fam Pract 2018; 19:116. [PMID: 30021506 PMCID: PMC6052715 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0813-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Depression in older people may have a prevalence as high as 20%, and is associated with physical co-morbidities, loss, and loneliness. It is associated with poorer health outcomes and reduced quality of life, and is under-diagnosed and under-treated. Older people may find it difficult to speak to their GPs about low mood, and GPs may avoid identifying depression due to limited consultation time and referral options for older patients. Methods A qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial for older people with moderate to severe depression: the CASPER plus Trial (Care for Screen Positive Elders). We interviewed patient participants, GPs, and case managers (CM) to explore patients’ and professionals’ views on collaborative care developed for older people, and how this model could be implemented at scale. Transcripts were analysed thematically using normalization process theory. Results Thirty-three interviews were conducted. Across the three data-sets, four main themes were identified based on the main principles of the Normalization Process Theory: understanding of collaborative care, interaction between patients and professionals, liaison between GPs and case managers, and the potential for implementation. Conclusions A telephone-delivered intervention, incorporating behavioural activation, is acceptable to older people with depression, and is deliverable by case managers. The collaborative care framework makes sense to case managers and has the potential to optimize patient outcomes, but implementation requires integration in day to day general practice. Increasing GPs’ understanding of collaborative care might improve liaison and collaboration with case managers, and facilitate the intervention through better support of patients. The CASPER plus model, delivering therapy to older adults with depression by telephone, offers the potential for implementation in a resource-poor health service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kathryn Taylor
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Senate House, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK.
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Katharine Bosanquet
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Karen Overend
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Deborah Foster
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Helen Lewis
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Carolyn Anne Chew-Graham
- Research Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.,West Midlands CLAHRC (Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care), Warwick, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Burroughs H, Bartlam B, Ray M, Kingstone T, Shepherd T, Ogollah R, Proctor J, Waheed W, Bower P, Bullock P, Lovell K, Gilbody S, Bailey D, Butler-Whalley S, Chew-Graham C. A feasibility study for NOn-Traditional providers to support the management of Elderly People with Anxiety and Depression: The NOTEPAD study Protocol. Trials 2018; 19:172. [PMID: 29514682 PMCID: PMC5842638 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2550-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anxiety and depression are common among older people, with up to 20% reporting such symptoms, and the prevalence increases with co-morbid chronic physical health problems. Access to treatment for anxiety and depression in this population is poor due to a combination of factors at the level of patient, practitioner and healthcare system. There is evidence to suggest that older people with anxiety and/or depression may benefit both from one-to-one interventions and group social or educational activities, which reduce loneliness, are participatory and offer some activity. Non-traditional providers (support workers) working within third-sector (voluntary) organisations are a valuable source of expertise within the community but are under-utilised by primary care practitioners. Such a resource could increase access to care, and be less stigmatising and more acceptable for older people. METHODS The study is in three phases and this paper describes the protocol for phase III, which will evaluate the feasibility of recruiting general practices and patients into the study, and determine whether support workers can deliver the intervention to older people with sufficient fidelity and whether this approach is acceptable to patients, general practitioners and the third-sector providers. Phase III of the NOTEPAD study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that is individually randomised. It recruited participants from approximately six general practices in the UK. In total, 100 participants aged 65 years and over who score 10 or more on PHQ9 or GAD7 for anxiety or depression will be recruited and randomised to the intervention or usual general practice care. A mixed methods approach will be used and follow-up will be conducted 12 weeks post-randomisation. DISCUSSION This study will inform the design and methods of a future full-scale RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN16318986 . Registered 10 November 2016. The ISRCTN registration is in line with the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set. The present paper represents the original version of the protocol. Any changes to the protocol will be communicated to ISRCTN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Burroughs
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Bernadette Bartlam
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Mo Ray
- Department School of Health and Social Care, Lincoln University, Lincoln, UK
| | - Tom Kingstone
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
- South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust, St Georges Hospital, Stafford, ST16 3SR UK
| | - Tom Shepherd
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Reuben Ogollah
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Janine Proctor
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Waquas Waheed
- National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bullock
- National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Stephanie Butler-Whalley
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Carolyn Chew-Graham
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
- South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust, St Georges Hospital, Stafford, ST16 3SR UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lewis H, Adamson J, Atherton K, Bailey D, Birtwistle J, Bosanquet K, Clare E, Delgadillo J, Ekers D, Foster D, Gabe R, Gascoyne S, Haley L, Hargate R, Hewitt C, Holmes J, Keding A, Lilley-Kelly A, Maya J, McMillan D, Meer S, Meredith J, Mitchell N, Nutbrown S, Overend K, Pasterfield M, Richards D, Spilsbury K, Torgerson D, Traviss-Turner G, Trépel D, Woodhouse R, Ziegler F, Gilbody S. CollAborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with subthreshold depression (CASPER): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-196. [PMID: 28248154 DOI: 10.3310/hta21080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to reduce the burden of illness and personal suffering associated with depression in older adults have focused on those with more severe depressive syndromes. Less attention has been paid to those with mild disorders/subthreshold depression, but these patients also suffer significant impairments in their quality of life and level of functioning. There is currently no clear evidence-based guidance regarding treatment for this patient group. OBJECTIVES To establish the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity intervention of collaborative care for primary care older adults who screened positive for subthreshold depression. DESIGN A pragmatic, multicentred, two-arm, parallel, individually randomised controlled trial with a qualitative study embedded within the pilot. Randomisation occurred after informed consent and baseline measures were collected. SETTING Thirty-two general practitioner (GP) practices in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS A total of 705 participants aged ≥ 75 years during the pilot phase and ≥ 65 years during the main trial with subthreshold depression. INTERVENTIONS Participants in the intervention group received a low-intensity intervention of collaborative care, which included behavioural activation delivered by a case manager for an average of six sessions over 7-8 weeks, alongside usual GP care. Control-arm participants received only usual GP care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was a self-reported measure of depression severity, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items PHQ-9 score at 4 months post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures included the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, Short Form questionnaire-12 items, Patient Health Questionnaire-15 items, Generalised Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale two-item version, a medication questionnaire and objective data. Participants were followed up for 12 months. RESULTS In total, 705 participants were randomised (collaborative care n = 344, usual care n = 361), with 586 participants (83%; collaborative care 76%, usual care 90%) followed up at 4 months and 519 participants (74%; collaborative care 68%, usual care 79%) followed up at 12 months. Attrition was markedly greater in the collaborative care arm. Model estimates at the primary end point of 4 months revealed a statistically significant effect in favour of collaborative care compared with usual care [mean difference 1.31 score points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.95 score points; p < 0.001]. The difference equates to a standard effect size of 0.30, for which the trial was powered. Treatment differences measured by the PHQ-9 were maintained at 12 months' follow-up (mean difference 1.33 score points, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.10 score points; p = 0.001). Base-case cost-effectiveness analysis found that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £9633 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). On average, participants allocated to collaborative care displayed significantly higher QALYs than those allocated to the control group (annual difference in adjusted QALYs of 0.044, 95% bias-corrected CI 0.015 to 0.072; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Collaborative care has been shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective for older adults with subthreshold depression and to reduce the proportion of people who go on to develop case-level depression at 12 months. This intervention could feasibly be delivered in the NHS at an acceptable cost-benefit ratio. Important future work would include investigating the longer-term effect of collaborative care on the CASPER population, which could be conducted by introducing an extension to follow-up, and investigating the impact of collaborative care on managing multimorbidities in people with subthreshold depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02202951. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Lewis
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Joy Adamson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Katie Atherton
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Emily Clare
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Clinical Research Network (Mental Health) North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jaime Delgadillo
- Primary Care Mental Health Service, Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Mental Health Research Group, University of Durham, Durham, UK
| | - Deborah Foster
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Lesley Haley
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Clinical Research Network North East and North Cumbria, Research and Development Department, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - John Holmes
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Jahnese Maya
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Clinical Research Network (Mental Health) North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Shaista Meer
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jodi Meredith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Sarah Nutbrown
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karen Overend
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - David Richards
- Department of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | | | - Dominic Trépel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Littlewood E, Ali S, Dyson L, Keding A, Ansell P, Bailey D, Bates D, Baxter C, Beresford-Dent J, Clarke A, Gascoyne S, Gray C, Hackney L, Hewitt C, Hutchinson D, Jefferson L, Mann R, Marshall D, McMillan D, North A, Nutbrown S, Peckham E, Pervin J, Richardson Z, Swan K, Taylor H, Waterhouse B, Wills L, Woodhouse R, Gilbody S. Identifying perinatal depression with case-finding instruments: a mixed-methods study (BaBY PaNDA – Born and Bred in Yorkshire PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy). Health Serv Deliv Res 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Perinatal depression is well recognised as a mental health condition but < 50% of cases are identified in routine practice. A case-finding strategy using the Whooley questions is currently recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Objectives
To determine the diagnostic accuracy, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to identify perinatal depression.
Design
A prospective diagnostic accuracy cohort study, with concurrent qualitative and economic evaluations.
Setting
Maternity services in England.
Participants
A total of 391 pregnant women.
Main outcome measures
Women completed the Whooley questions, EPDS and a diagnostic reference standard (Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised) during pregnancy (20 weeks) and postnatally (3–4 months). Qualitative interviews were conducted with health professionals (HPs) and a subsample of women.
Results
Diagnostic accuracy results: depression prevalence rates were 10.3% during pregnancy and 10.5% postnatally. The Whooley questions and EPDS (cut-off point of ≥ 10) performed reasonably well, with comparable sensitivity [pregnancy: Whooley questions 85.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 70.2% to 94.3%; EPDS 82.5%, 95% CI 67.2% to 92.7%; postnatally: Whooley questions 85.7%, 95% CI 69.7% to 95.2%; EPDS 82.9%, 95% CI 66.4% to 93.4%] and specificity (pregnancy: Whooley questions 83.7%, 95% CI 79.4% to 87.4%; EPDS 86.6%, 95% CI 82.5% to 90.0%; postnatally: Whooley questions 80.6%, 95% CI 75.7% to 84.9%; EPDS 87.6%, 95% CI 83.3% to 91.1%). Diagnostic accuracy of the EPDS (cut-off point of ≥ 13) was poor at both time points (pregnancy: sensitivity 45%, 95% CI 29.3% to 61.5%, and specificity 95.7%, 95% CI 93.0% to 97.6%; postnatally: sensitivity 62.9%, 95% CI 44.9% to 78.5%, and specificity 95.7%, 95% CI 92.7% to 97.7%). Qualitative evaluation: women and HPs were supportive of screening/case-finding for perinatal depression. The EPDS was preferred to the Whooley questions by women and HPs, mainly because of its ‘softer’ wording. Whooley question 1 was thought to be less acceptable, largely because of the terms ‘depressed’ and ‘hopeless’, leading to women not revealing their depressive symptoms. HPs identified a ‘patient-centred’ environment that focused on the mother and baby to promote discussion about mental health. Cost-effectiveness results: screening/case-finding using the Whooley questions or the EPDS alone was not the most cost-effective strategy. A two-stage strategy, ‘Whooley questions followed by the Patient Health Questionnaire’ (a measure assessing depression symptomatology), was the most cost-effective strategy in the range between £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year in both the prenatal and postnatal decision models.
Limitations
Perinatal depression diagnosis was not cross-referenced with women’s medical records so the proportion of new cases identified is unknown. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening/case-finding strategies was not assessed as part of a randomised controlled trial.
Conclusions
The Whooley questions and EPDS had acceptable sensitivity and specificity, but their use in practice might be limited by low predictive value and variation in their acceptability. A two-stage strategy was more cost-effective than single-stage strategies. Neither case-finding instrument met National Screening Committee criteria.
Future work
The yield of screening/case-finding should be established with reference to health-care records. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening/case-finding for perinatal depression needs to be tested in a randomised controlled trial.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Littlewood
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lisa Dyson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ada Keding
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Pat Ansell
- Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Debrah Bates
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe General Hospital, Scunthorpe, UK
| | - Catherine Baxter
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bootham Park Hospital, York, UK
| | - Jules Beresford-Dent
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bootham Park Hospital, York, UK
| | - Arabella Clarke
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Samantha Gascoyne
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Carol Gray
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe General Hospital, Scunthorpe, UK
| | - Lisa Hackney
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bootham Park Hospital, York, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Dorothy Hutchinson
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe General Hospital, Scunthorpe, UK
| | - Laura Jefferson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Rachel Mann
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Marshall
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bootham Park Hospital, York, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | - Alice North
- Patient and public involvement representative, York, UK
| | - Sarah Nutbrown
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jodi Pervin
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Zoe Richardson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kelly Swan
- Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Holly Taylor
- Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bootham Park Hospital, York, UK
| | - Bev Waterhouse
- Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Louise Wills
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate District Hospital, Harrogate, UK
| | - Rebecca Woodhouse
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Peckham E, Arundel C, Bailey D, Callen T, Cusack C, Crosland S, Foster P, Herlihy H, Hope J, Ker S, McCloud T, Romain-Hooper CB, Stribling A, Phiri P, Tait E, Gilbody S. Successful recruitment to trials: findings from the SCIMITAR+ Trial. Trials 2018; 19:53. [PMID: 29351792 PMCID: PMC5775553 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2460-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCT) can struggle to recruit to target on time. This is especially the case with hard to reach populations such as those with severe mental ill health. The SCIMITAR+ trial, a trial of a bespoke smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental ill health achieved their recruitment ahead of time and target. This article reports strategies that helped us to achieve this with the aim of aiding others recruiting from similar populations. Methods SCIMITAR+ is a multi-centre pragmatic two-arm parallel-group RCT, which aimed to recruit 400 participants with severe mental ill health who smoke and would like to cut down or quit. The study recruited primarily in secondary care through community mental health teams and psychiatrists with a smaller number of participants recruited through primary care. Recruitment opened in October 2015 and closed in December 2016, by which point 526 participants had been recruited. We gathered information from recruiting sites on strategies which led to the successful recruitment in SCIMITAR+ and in this article present our approach to trial management along with the strategies employed by the recruiting sites. Results Alongside having a dedicated trial manager and trial management team, we identified three main themes that led to successful recruitment. These were: clinicians with a positive attitude to research; researchers and clinicians working together; and the use of NHS targets. The overriding theme was the importance of relationships between both the researchers and the recruiting clinicians and the recruiting clinicians and the participants. Conclusions This study makes a significant contribution to the limited evidence base of real-world cases of successful recruitment to RCTs and offers practical guidance to those planning and conducting trials. Building positive relationships between clinicians, researchers and participants is crucial to successful recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Catherine Arundel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | | | | - Suzanne Crosland
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Penny Foster
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 8DW, UK
| | - Hannah Herlihy
- Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, ME16 9PH, UK
| | - James Hope
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, NE3 3XT, UK
| | - Suzy Ker
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, HG1 2PW, UK
| | - Tayla McCloud
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | | - Alison Stribling
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB21 5EF, UK
| | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO30 3JB, UK
| | - Ellen Tait
- 2gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, GL1 1LY, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Burton JE, Easterbrook L, Pitman J, Anderson D, Roddy S, Bailey D, Vipond R, Bruce CB, Roberts AD. The effect of a non-denaturing detergent and a guanidinium-based inactivation agent on the viability of Ebola virus in mock clinical serum samples. J Virol Methods 2017; 250:34-40. [PMID: 28941617 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa required the rapid testing of clinical material for the presence of potentially high titre Ebola virus (EBOV). Safe, fast and effective methods for the inactivation of such clinical samples are required so that rapid diagnostic tests including downstream analysis by RT-qPCR or nucleotide sequencing can be carried out. One of the most commonly used guanidinium - based denaturing agents, AVL (Qiagen) has been shown to fully inactivate EBOV once ethanol is added, however this is not compatible with the use of automated nucleic acid extraction systems. Additional inactivation agents need to be identified that can be used in automated systems. A candidate inactivation agent is Triton X-100, a non-denaturing detergent that is frequently used in clinical nucleic acid extraction procedures and has previously been used for inactivation of EBOV. In this study the effect of 0.1% and 1.0% Triton X-100 (final concentration 0.08% and 0.8% respectively) alone and in combination with AVL on the viability of EBOV (106 TCID50/ml) spiked into commercially available pooled negative human serum was tested. The presence of viable EBOV in the treated samples was assessed by carrying out three serial passages of the samples in Vero E6 cells (37°C, 5% CO2, 1 week for each passage). At the end of each passage the cells were observed for evidence of cytopathic effect and samples were taken for rRT-PCR analysis for the presence of EBOV RNA. Before cell culture cytotoxic components of AVL and Triton X-100 were removed from the samples using size exclusion spin column technology or a hydrophobic adsorbent resin. The results of this study showed that EBOV spiked into human serum was not fully inactivated when treated with either 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 10 mins or 1.0% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 20 mins (final concentrations 0.08% and 0.8% Triton X-100 respectively). AVL alone also did not consistently provide complete inactivation. Samples treated with both AVL and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 or 20 mins were shown to be completely inactivated. This treatment is compatible with downstream analysis by RT-qPCR and next generation sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Burton
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
| | - L Easterbrook
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - J Pitman
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - D Anderson
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - S Roddy
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - D Bailey
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - R Vipond
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - C B Bruce
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - A D Roberts
- High Containment Microbiology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Darby I, Barrow SY, Cvetkovic B, Musolino R, Wise S, Yung C, Bailey D. Periodontal treatment in private dental practice: a case-based survey. Aust Dent J 2017; 62:471-477. [PMID: 28423453 DOI: 10.1111/adj.12523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the management and referral patterns of Victorian general dental practitioners based on periodontal diagnosis. METHODS Following ethics approval, Victorian general dental practitioners were invited to complete five randomized text-based periodontitis scenario questionnaires. Based on their diagnosis, respondents were asked for their management options and asked to specify who would perform these treatments. Respondents were also asked about referral procedures. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-five dentists attempted the survey. Most were in group practice and based in Melbourne. Of the total respondents, 22.5% worked in a practice employing a hygienist. The management of periodontal disease was appropriate, and treatment options increased with severity. As severity increased, patients were more likely to be referred to a periodontist. Periodontal services referred by general dentists to dental hygienists increased with the number of days the hygienists worked within a practice. Over- and underdiagnosis did not markedly affect management. The recommendation of antibiotics, mouthwashes and periodontal surgery varied depending on year and school of graduation. CONCLUSIONS The general dentists that completed the survey are managing periodontal conditions appropriately and according to current guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Darby
- Periodontics, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S-Y Barrow
- eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - B Cvetkovic
- eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Musolino
- eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Wise
- eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Yung
- eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Bailey
- eviDent Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Back M, LeMottee M, Crasta C, Bailey D, Wheeler H, Guo L, Eade T. Reducing radiation dose to normal brain through a risk adapted dose reduction protocol for patients with favourable subtype anaplastic glioma. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:46. [PMID: 28253929 PMCID: PMC5335728 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0782-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutated anaplastic glioma determine the dosimetric benefits of delivering radiation therapy using a PET guided integrated boost IMRT technique (ib-IMRT) compared with standard IMRT (s-IMRT) in reducing dose to normal brain. METHODS Ten patients with anaplastic glioma, identified as a favourable molecular subgroup through presence of IDH mutation, and managed with radiation therapy using an ib-IMRT were enrolled into a dosimetric study comparing two RT techniques: s-IMRT to 59.4Gy or ib-IMRT with 59.4/54Gy regions. Gross Tumour volume (GTV) and Clinical Target Volumes (CTV) were determined by MRI, 18F-Fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging. A standard risk Planning Target Volume (PTVsr) receiving 59.4Gy (PTV59.4) in the s-IMRT technique was determined by MRI T2Flair and FET PET. For the ib-IMRT technique this PTVsr volume was treated to 54Gy, and the high-risk PTV (PTVhr) receiving 59.4Gy was determined as a higher risk region by FDG PET and MRI gadolinium enhancement. Standard dosimetric criteria and normal tissue constraints based on recent clinical trials were used in target delineation and planning. Normal Brain was defined as Brain minus CTV. Endpoints for dosimetric evaluation related to mean Brain dose (mBrainDose), brain volume receiving 40Gy (Brainv40) and 20Gy (Brainv20). The variation between the dosimetric endpoints for both techniques was examined using Wilcoxon analysis. RESULTS The 10 patients had tumours located in temporal (1), parietal (3), occipital (2) and bifrontal (4) regions. In ib-IMRT technique the median volume of PTVhr was 25.5 cm3 compared with PTVsr of 300.0 cm3. For dose to PTVhr the two treatments were equivalent (p = 0.33), and although the ibIMRT had a prescribed 10% dose reduction from 59.4Gy to 54Gy the median reduction was only 5.9%. The ib-IMRT dosimetry was significantly improved in normal brain endpoints specifically mBrainDose (p = 0.007), Brainv40 (p = 0.005) and Brainv20 (p = 0.001), with a median reduction of 9.3%, 19.0 and 10.8% respectively. After a median follow-up of 38 months two patients have progressed, with no isolated relapse in the dose reduction region. CONCLUSION An approach using ib-IMRT for anaplastic glioma produces significant dosimetric advantages in relation to normal brain dose compared with s-IMRT plan. This is achieved without a significant reduction to the target volume dose despite the reduction in prescribed dose. This technique has advantages to minimise potential late neurocognitive effects from high dose radiation in patients with favorable subtype anaplastic glioma with predicted median survival beyond ten years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Back
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia. .,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. .,Sydney Neuro-Oncology Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - M LeMottee
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - C Crasta
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Bailey
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia.,Department of PET and Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - H Wheeler
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Neuro-Oncology Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L Guo
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - T Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|