The prevalence of bilateral and ipsilateral radiographic osteoarthritis is high in White, Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders presenting for unilateral knee or hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that one-third of patients presenting with unilateral joint pain have contralateral osteoarthritis (OA) at first presentation. Most studies have primarily examined White patient cohorts. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of contralateral joint OA for patients presenting for unilateral total knee (TKA), unicompartmental knee (UKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) among Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White patients.

METHODS

Bilateral radiographic reports at initial presentation of 2,312 subjects who underwent unilateral arthroplasties (332 UKAs, 933 TKAs and 1,047 THAs) were reviewed. The presence of contralateral OA was recorded and compared by racial group and type of arthroplasty performed. Parametric statistical analyses were performed to determine differences between groups. Multivariable analyses were completed for each arthroplasty group to determine the influence on the presence of contralateral OA, presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Contralateral joint OA was present in 86.7%, 90.4% and 70.4% of UKA, TKA and THA patients, respectively. Concurrent hip OA was present in 41.6% and 59.5% of UKA and TKA patients. No racial differences in the prevalence of contralateral knee OA were found for knee arthroplasty patients. White patients (74.6%) had a greater prevalence of contralateral hip OA compared to Asians (66.5%, p = 0.037) amongst THA recipients. Increased age and body mass index were significantly associated with the presence of contralateral knee OA. Increased age, being male and being White were significant contributors for the presence of contralateral hip OA.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of contralateral joint OA and concurrent hip OA is high in all three racial groups. Due to the extensive prevalence of contralateral and concurrent knee and hip OA, bilateral radiographic evaluation should be considered for all patients presenting with unilateral hip or knee pain due to OA.

Influence of obesity and intra-operative imaging guidance technology on acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Accuracy of acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be improved with intra-operative imaging but may be influenced by body mass index (BMI). This study assessed the influence of BMI (kg/m2) on cup accuracy when using intra-operative fluoroscopy (IF) alone or supplemented with a commercial product.

METHODS

This retrospective review included four consecutive cohorts of patients having undergone anterior approach THA with IF alone (2011-2015), IF and Overlay (2015-2016) (Radlink Inc., Los Angeles, CA), IF and Grid (2017-2018) (HipGrid Drone™, OrthoGrid Systems Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) and IF and Digital (2018-2020) (OrthoGrid Phantom®, OrthoGrid Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). Component placement accuracy was measured on 6-week post-operative weight bearing radiographs and compared between four BMI patient groups (BMI ≤ 25, 25 < BMI ≤ 30, 30 < BMI ≤ 35, and 35 < BMI). Total fluoroscopy times were also recorded directly from the fluoroscopy unit.

RESULTS

Abduction angle significantly increased as BMI increased (p = 0.003) with IF alone but no difference was present in groups with guidance technology. Anteversion was significantly different between BMI groups for IF alone (p = 0.028) and Grid (p = 0.027) but was not different in Overlay (p = 0.107) or Digital (p = 0.210). Fluoroscopy time was significantly different between BMI categories for IF alone (p = 0.005) and Grid (p = 0.018) but was not different in Overlay (p = 0.444) or Digital (p = 0.170).

CONCLUSION

Morbid obesity (BMI > 35) increases risk for malpositioning of acetabular cups and increases surgical time with IF alone or the Grid. Additional IF guidance technology (Overlay or Digital) increased cup positioning accuracy without decreasing surgical efficiency.

Hip Offset and Leg Length Equalization in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty without Preoperative Templating

The standard practice of preoperative templating may be less important for direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) with intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF). However, this has yet to be tested. The purpose of this retrospective review was to report the hip offset (HO) and leg length (LL) equalization accuracy following 304 consecutively performed DAA THA with IF and no preoperative templating. A supplemental fluoroscopic gridding tool was used to assess hip symmetry. Operative and fluoroscopic times were also documented to assess for surgical efficiency. The mean HO and LL difference was 3.5 ± 2.6 mm (range: 0.0-9.3) and 2.9 ± 2.2 mm (range: 0.0-9.9), respectively. Hip offset and LL equalization within 10 mm was achieved in all patients. The mean operative time for unilateral THA was 72.2 ± 12.0 minutes, and the mean fluoroscopy time per hip was 10.5 ± 4.5 seconds. These results suggest that for surgeons with adequate experience performing DAA THA with IF, preoperative templating may not be necessary to reliably and efficiently achieve clinically acceptable HO and LL.