1
|
Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Kothari S, Humar A, Albasata H, Yetmar ZA, Razonable RR, Neofytos D, D'Asaro M, Boggian K, Hirzel C, Khanna N, Manuel O, Mueller NJ, Imlay H, Kabbani D, Tyagi V, Smibert OC, Nasra M, Fontana L, Obeid KM, Apostolopoulou A, Zhang SX, Permpalung N, Alhatimi H, Silverman MS, Guo H, Rogers BA, MacKenzie E, Pisano J, Gioia F, Rapi L, Prasad GVR, Banegas M, Alonso CD, Doss K, Rakita RM, Fishman JA. Adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients: A multicenter cohort, 2015-2020. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:653-668. [PMID: 37977229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) frequently receive adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy (AGT) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). This multicenter cohort of SOTRs with PJP admitted to 20 transplant centers in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Australia, was examined for whether AGT was associated with a lower rate of all-cause intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 90-day death, or a composite outcome (ICU admission or death). Of 172 SOTRs with PJP (median [IQR] age: 60 (51.5-67.0) years; 58 female [33.7%]), the ICU admission and death rates were 43.4%, and 20.8%, respectively. AGT was not associated with a reduced risk of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI]: 0.49 [0.21-1.12]), death (aOR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.30-2.17]), or the composite outcome (aOR [95% CI]: 0.97 [0.71-1.31]) in the propensity score-adjusted analysis. AGT was not significantly associated with at least 1 unit of the respiratory portion of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score improvement by day 5 (12/37 [32.4%] vs 39/111 [35.1%]; P = .78). We did not observe significant associations between AGT and ICU admission or death in SOTRs with PJP. Our findings should prompt a reevaluation of routine AGT administration in posttransplant PJP treatment and highlight the need for interventional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed M Hosseini-Moghaddam
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sagar Kothari
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Atul Humar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanan Albasata
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Matilde D'Asaro
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Katia Boggian
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cedric Hirzel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nina Khanna
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Oriol Manuel
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Vaud, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas J Mueller
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hannah Imlay
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Dima Kabbani
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Varalika Tyagi
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Olivia C Smibert
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne at Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mohamed Nasra
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne at Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren Fontana
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karam M Obeid
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anna Apostolopoulou
- Transplant Infectious Disease Program and Transplant Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sean X Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nitipong Permpalung
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hind Alhatimi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael S Silverman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry Guo
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin A Rogers
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erica MacKenzie
- Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer Pisano
- Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Francesca Gioia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Roman y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lindita Rapi
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcela Banegas
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carolyn D Alonso
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathleen Doss
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert M Rakita
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jay A Fishman
- Transplant Infectious Disease Program and Transplant Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prasad GVR, Nash MM, Yuan W, Beriault D, Yazdanpanah M, Connelly PW. Plasma Branched-Chain Amino Acid Concentrations and Glucose Homeostasis in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Candidates. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2023; 10:20543581231168085. [PMID: 37101847 PMCID: PMC10123875 DOI: 10.1177/20543581231168085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) encompasses new-onset and previously unrecognized type 2 diabetes. Kidney failure masks type 2 diabetes. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) are closely associated with glucose metabolism. Therefore, understanding BCAA metabolism both in kidney failure and after kidney transplantation may inform PTDM mechanisms. Objective To understand the impact of present or absent kidney function on plasma BCAA concentrations. Design Cross-sectional study of kidney transplant recipients and kidney transplant candidates. Setting Large kidney transplant center in Toronto, Canada. Measurements We measured plasma BCAA and aromatic amino acid (AAA) concentrations in 45 pre-kidney transplant candidates (15 with type 2 diabetes, 30 without type 2 diabetes) and 45 post-kidney transplant recipients (15 PTDM, 30 non-PTDM), along with insulin resistance and sensitivity by 75 g oral glucose loading for those in each group without type 2 diabetes. Methods Plasma AA concentrations were analyzed using MassChrom AA Analysis and compared between groups. The insulin sensitivity for oral glucose tolerance tests or Matsuda index (a measure of whole-body insulin resistance), Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (a measure of hepatic insulin resistance), and Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2, a measure of pancreatic β-cell response) was calculated from fasting insulin and glucose concentrations, and compared with BCAA concentrations. Results Each BCAA concentration was higher in post-transplant subjects than pre-transplant subjects (P < .001 for leucine, isoleucine, valine). In post-transplant subjects, each BCAA concentration was higher in PTDM versus non-PTDM (odds ratio for PTDM 3-4 per 1 SD increase in BCAA concentration, P < .001 for each). Tyrosine concentrations were also higher in post-transplant subjects than pre-transplant subjects, but tyrosine did not differ by PTDM status. By contrast, neither BCAA nor AAA concentrations were different in pre-transplant subjects with or without type 2 diabetes. Whole-body insulin resistance, hepatic insulin resistance, and pancreatic β-cell response did not differ between nondiabetic post-transplant and pre-transplant subjects. Branched-chain amino acid concentrations correlated with the Matsuda index and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (P < .05 for each) only in nondiabetic post-transplant subjects-not in nondiabetic pre-transplant subjects. Branched-chain amino acid concentrations did not correlate with ISSI-2 in either pre-transplant or post-transplant subjects. Limitations The sample size was small, and subjects were not studied prospectively for the development of type 2 diabetes. Conclusions Plasma BCAA concentrations are higher post-transplant in type 2 diabetic states, but do not differ by diabetes status in the presence of kidney failure. The association of BCAA with measures of hepatic insulin resistance among nondiabetic post-transplant patients is consistent with impaired BCAA metabolism as a characteristic of kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- G. V. Ramesh Prasad, Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada.
| | - M. M. Nash
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W. Yuan
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D. Beriault
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M. Yazdanpanah
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P. W. Connelly
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garg AX, Arnold JB, Cuerden M, Dipchand C, Feldman LS, Gill JS, Karpinski M, Klarenbach S, Knoll GA, Lok C, Miller M, Monroy-Cuadros M, Nguan C, Prasad GVR, Sontrop JM, Storsley L, Boudville N. The Living Kidney Donor Safety Study: Protocol of a Prospective Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221129442. [PMID: 36325263 PMCID: PMC9619271 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221129442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Living kidney donation is considered generally safe in healthy individuals; however, there is a need to better understand the long-term effects of donation on blood pressure and kidney function. Objectives To determine the risk of hypertension in healthy, normotensive adults who donate a kidney compared with healthy, normotensive non-donors with similar indicators of baseline health. We will also compare the 2 groups on the rate of decline in kidney function, the risk of albuminuria, and changes in health-related quality of life. Design Participants and Setting Prospective cohort study of 1042 living kidney donors recruited before surgery from 17 transplant centers (12 in Canada and 5 in Australia) between 2004 and 2014. Non-donor participants (n = 396) included relatives or friends of the donor, or donor candidates who were ineligible to donate due to blood group or cross-match incompatibility. Follow-up will continue until 2021, and the main analysis will be performed in 2022. The anticipated median (25th, 75th percentile, maximum) follow-up time after donation is 7 years (6, 8, 15). Measurements Donors and non-donors completed the same schedule of measurements at baseline and follow-up (non-donors were assigned a simulated nephrectomy date). Annual measurements were obtained for blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, patient-reported health-related quality of life, and general health. Outcomes Incident hypertension (a systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg or receipt of anti-hypertensive medication) will be adjudicated by a physician blinded to the participant's donation status. We will assess the rate of change in eGFR starting from 12 months after the nephrectomy date and the proportion who develop an albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol (≥30 mg/g) in follow-up. Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 36-item RAND health survey and the Beck Anxiety and Depression inventories. Limitations Donation-attributable hypertension may not manifest until decades after donation. Conclusion This prospective cohort study will estimate the attributable risk of hypertension and other health outcomes after living kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit X. Garg
- Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, ON, Canada,Amit X. Garg, Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, ELL-200, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | | | - Meaghan Cuerden
- Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - John S. Gill
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | - Greg A. Knoll
- Department of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall VG, Solera JT, Al-Alahmadi G, Marinelli T, Cardinal H, Poirier C, Huard G, Prasad GVR, De Serres SA, Isaac D, Mainra R, Lamarche C, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Gilmour S, Humar A, Kumar D. Severity of COVID-19 among solid organ transplant recipients in Canada, 2020–2021: a prospective, multicentre cohort study. CMAJ 2022; 194:E1155-E1163. [PMID: 36302101 PMCID: PMC9435532 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Severe COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect people who are immunocompromised, although Canadian data in this context are limited. We sought to determine factors associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes among recipients of organ transplants across Canada. Methods: We performed a multicentre, prospective cohort study of all recipients of solid organ transplants from 9 transplant programs in Canada who received a diagnosis of COVID-19 from March 2020 to November 2021. Data were analyzed to determine risk factors for oxygen requirement and other metrics of disease severity. We compared outcomes by organ transplant type and examined changes in outcomes over time. We performed a multivariable analysis to determine variables associated with need for supplemental oxygen. Results: A total of 509 patients with solid organ transplants had confirmed COVID-19 during the study period. Risk factors associated with needing (n = 190), compared with not needing (n = 319), supplemental oxygen included age (median 62.6 yr, interquartile range [IQR] 52.5–69.5 yr v. median 55.5 yr, IQR 47.5–66.5; p < 0.001) and number of comorbidities (median 3, IQR 2–3 v. median 2, IQR 1–3; p < 0.001), as well as parameters associated with immunosuppression. Recipients of lung transplants (n = 48) were more likely to have severe disease with a high mortality rate (n = 15, 31.3%) compared with recipients of other organ transplants, including kidney (n = 48, 14.8%), heart (n = 1, 4.4%), liver (n = 9, 11.4%) and kidney–pancreas (n = 3, 12.0%) transplants (p = 0.02). Protective factors against needing supplemental oxygen included having had a liver transplant and receiving azathioprine. Having had 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine did not have an appreciable influence on oxygen requirement. Multivariable analysis showed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.07) and number of comorbidities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.30–2.04), among other factors, were associated with the need for supplemental oxygen. Over time, disease severity did not decline significantly. Interpretation: Despite therapeutic advances and vaccination of recipients of solid organ transplants, evidence of increased severity of COVID-19, in particular among those with lung transplants, supports ongoing public health measures to protect these at-risk people, and early use of COVID-19 therapies for recipients of solid organ transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G Hall
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Javier T Solera
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Ghadeer Al-Alahmadi
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Tina Marinelli
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Heloise Cardinal
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Charles Poirier
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Geneviève Huard
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Sacha A De Serres
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Debra Isaac
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Caroline Lamarche
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Susan Gilmour
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Atul Humar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program (Hall, Solera, Al-Alahmadi, Marinelli, Humar, Kumar), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (Hall), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (Marinelli), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AU; Department of Medicine (Cardinal, Poirier, Huard), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Kidney Transplant Program (Prasad), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine (De Serres), University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Que.; Division of Transplant Medicine (Isaac), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division (Mainra), Department of Medicine, University Health Centre of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute (Lamarche), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (Sapir-Pichhadze), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health (Sapir-Pichhadze), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Gilmour), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hall VG, Al-Alahmadi G, Solera JT, Marinelli T, Cardinal H, Prasad GVR, De Serres SA, Isaac D, Mainra R, Lamarche C, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Gilmour S, Matelski J, Humar A, Kumar D. Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Unvaccinated Compared With Vaccinated Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Matched Cohort Study. Transplantation 2022; 106:1622-1628. [PMID: 35502801 PMCID: PMC9311277 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk for complications from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccination may mitigate this risk; however, immunogenicity appears to be significantly impaired, with reports of increased risk of breakthrough infection. It is unknown if vaccine breakthrough infections are milder or as severe as infections in unvaccinated patients. METHODS We performed a multicenter matched cohort study between March 2020 and September 2021 to assess influence of COVID-19 vaccination on outcomes of COVID-19 infection. Treatment characteristics and disease severity outcomes were compared on the basis of vaccine status; breakthrough infections versus unvaccinated infections. Variable ratio propensity score matching based on age, sex, transplant type, and number of comorbidities, was used to develop the analytic cohort. Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of vaccination status on the selected outcomes. RESULTS From a cohort of 511 SOT patients with COVID-19, we matched 77 partially or fully vaccinated patients with 220 unvaccinated patients. Treatment characteristics including use of dexamethasone, remdesivir, and antibiotics did not differ. Vaccinated participants were more likely to receive tocilizumab, 15 of 77 (19.5%) versus 5 of 220 (2.3%), P < 0.001. Disease severity outcomes including oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, and mortality were similar among medically attended vaccine breakthroughs compared with unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSIONS SOT recipients who develop medically attended COVID-19 following 1- or 2-dose vaccination seem to have similar disease severity to unvaccinated patients who develop infection. This is consistent with the requirement that SOT recipients need 3 or more vaccine doses and emphasizes the importance of alternate strategies for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G. Hall
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ghadeer Al-Alahmadi
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Javier T. Solera
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Marinelli
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heloise Cardinal
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sacha A. De Serres
- Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Debra Isaac
- Division of Transplant Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, University Health Center of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Caroline Lamarche
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Susan Gilmour
- Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - John Matelski
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Atul Humar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prasad GVR, Sahay M, Kit-Chung Ng J. The Role of Registries in Kidney Transplantation Across International Boundaries. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:151267. [PMID: 36577647 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Transplant professionals strive to improve domestic kidney transplantation rates safely, cost efficiently, and ethically, but to increase rates further may wish to allow their recipients and donors to traverse international boundaries. Travel for transplantation presents significant challenges to the practice of transplantation medicine and donor medicine, but can be enhanced if sustainable international registries develop to include low- and low-middle income countries. Robust data collection and sharing across registries, linking pretransplant information to post-transplant information, linking donor to recipient information, increasing living donor transplant activity through paired exchange, and ongoing reporting of results to permit flexibility and adaptability to changing clinical environments, will all serve to enhance kidney transplantation across international boundaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Manisha Sahay
- Department of Nephrology, Osmania General Hospital, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Jack Kit-Chung Ng
- Carol and Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Center, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clase CM, Dicks E, Holden R, Sood MM, Levin A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Moore LW, Bartlett SJ, Bello AK, Bohm C, Bridgewater D, Bouchard J, Burger D, Carrero JJ, Donald M, Elliott M, Goldenberg MJ, Jardine M, Lam NN, Maddigan WJ, Madore F, Mavrakanas TA, Molnar AO, Prasad GVR, Rigatto C, Tennankore KK, Torban E, Trainor L, White CA, Hartwig S. Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221080327. [PMID: 35514878 PMCID: PMC9067031 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221080327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Peer review aims to select articles for publication and to improve articles before publication. We believe that this process can be infused by kindness without losing rigor. In 2014, the founding editorial team of the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) made an explicit commitment to treat authors as we would wish to be treated ourselves. This broader group of authors reaffirms this principle, for which we suggest the terminology “supportive review.”
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M. Clase
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, St Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rachel Holden
- Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Manish M. Sood
- Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, ON, Canada
| | - Adeera Levin
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Linda W Moore
- Houston Methodist Hospital Department of Surgery, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Aminu K. Bello
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Clara Bohm
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Darren Bridgewater
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Josee Bouchard
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Dylan Burger
- Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Juan Jesús Carrero
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maoliosa Donald
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Meghan Elliott
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Meg Jardine
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ngan N. Lam
- Division of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - W. Joy Maddigan
- Faculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
| | | | | | - Amber O. Molnar
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, St Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio Rigatto
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Karthik K. Tennankore
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Elena Torban
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laurel Trainor
- Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster Institute for Music and the Mind, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sunny Hartwig
- University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dharia AA, Huang M, Nash MM, Dacouris N, Zaltzman JS, Prasad GVR. Post-transplant outcomes in recipients of living donor kidneys and intended recipients of living donor kidneys. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:97. [PMID: 35247959 PMCID: PMC8898413 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02718-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term kidney transplant survival at the population level is consistently favorable, but this survival varies widely at an individual level due to both recipient and donor factors. The distinct contribution of recipient and donor factors to individual post kidney transplant outcome remains unclear. Comparing outcomes in deceased donor (DD) recipients with potential but non-actualized living donors (DD1) to those recipients with actualized living donors (LD), and to DD recipients without potential living donors (DD0) may provide transplant candidates with more information about their own post-transplant prognosis. Methods We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study of kidney transplant candidates presenting to our centre for evaluation between 01/01/06 and 31/12/18, and who also received a transplant during that time. Patients were followed to 31/08/2019. Candidates were classified as DD0, DD1, or LD based on whether they had an identified living donor at the time of initial pre-transplant assessment, and if the donor actualized or not. Primary outcome was 5-year death-censored graft survival, adjusted for common pre- and post-transplant donor and recipient risk factors. Secondary outcomes analyzed included patient survival and graft function. Results There were 453 kidney transplant recipients (LD = 136, DD1 = 83, DD0 = 234) who received a transplant during the study period. DD0 and DD1 did not differ in key donor organ characteristics. The 5-year death censored graft survival of DD1 was similar to LD (p = 0.19). DD0 graft survival was inferior to LD (p = 0.005), but also trended inferior to DD1 (p = 0.052). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, LD demonstrated similar 5-year graft survival to DD1 (HR for graft loss 0.8 [95% CI 0.25–2.6], p = 0.72) but LD graft survival was superior to DD0 (HR 0.34 [0.16–0.72], p = 0.005). The 5-year patient survival in DD1 was similar to LD (p = 0.26) but was superior to DD0 (p = 0.01). Conclusions DD recipients with potential but non-actualized living donors exhibit similar mid-term graft and patient survival compared to LD recipients. Having an identified living donor at the time of pre-transplant assessment portends a favorable prognosis for the recipient. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02718-6.
Collapse
|
9
|
Connelly PW, Yan AT, Nash MM, Wald RM, Lok C, Gunaratnam L, Kirpalani A, Prasad GVR. The Increase in Paraoxonase 1 Is Associated With Decrease in Left Ventricular Volume in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:763389. [PMID: 34926614 PMCID: PMC8674585 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.763389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients on dialysis have impaired cardiac function, in part due to increased fluid volume and ventricular stress. Restored kidney function through transplantation reduces left ventricular volume in both systole and diastole. We previously reported that the decrease in NT-proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was associated with a decrease in adiponectin. Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) has been inversely associated with cardiovascular outcomes. We now report the association of changes in PON1 with changes in left ventricular volume and left ventricular mass after kidney transplantation. Design: Patients on dialysis were assessed at baseline and 12 months after kidney transplantation (n = 38). A comparison group of patients on dialysis who were not expected to receive a transplant in the next 24 months were studied (n = 43) to determine if the change of PON1 with kidney transplantation achieved a significance greater than that due to biologic variation. Left ventricular volume and mass were determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. PON1 was measured by arylesterase activity and by mass. Results: PON1 mass and activity were not different between the groups at baseline. Both PON1 mass and activity were increased post-kidney transplantation (p < 0.0001 for change). The change in PON1 mass (p = 0.0062) and PON1 arylesterase activity (p = 0.0254) were inversely correlated with the change in NT-proBNP for patients receiving a kidney transplant. However, only the change in the PON1 mass, and not the change in PON1 arylesterase, was inversely correlated with the change in left ventricular volume (ml/m2.7) (p = 0.0146 and 0.0114 for diastolic and systolic, respectively) and with the change in hemoglobin (p = 0.0042). Conclusion: Both PON1 mass and arylesterase activity are increased by kidney transplantation. The increase in PON1 mass is consistent with a novel relationship to the increase in hemoglobin and decrease in left ventricular volume and NT-proBNP seen when kidney function is restored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip W Connelly
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew T Yan
- Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle M Nash
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel M Wald
- Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charmaine Lok
- Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lakshman Gunaratnam
- Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anish Kirpalani
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garcia-Ochoa C, Feldman LS, Nguan C, Monroy-Caudros M, Arnold JB, Barnieh L, Boudville N, Cuerden MS, Dipchand C, Gill JS, Karpinski M, Klarenbach S, Knoll G, Lok CE, Miller M, Prasad GVR, Sontrop JM, Storsley L, Garg AX. Impact of Perioperative Complications on Living Kidney Donor Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2021; 8:20543581211037429. [PMID: 34394947 PMCID: PMC8361543 DOI: 10.1177/20543581211037429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Although living kidney donation is safe, some donors experience perioperative complications. Objective: This study explored how perioperative complications affected donor-reported health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Design: This research was a conducted as a prospective cohort study. Setting: Twelve transplant centers across Canada. Patients: A total of 912 living kidney donors were included in this study. Measurements: Short Form 36 health survey, Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Methods: Living kidney donors were prospectively enrolled predonation between 2009 to 2014. Donor perioperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Mental and physical health-related quality of life was assessed with the 3 measurements; measurements were taken predonation and at 3- and 12-months postdonation. Results: Seventy-four donors (8%) experienced a perioperative complication; most were minor (n = 67 [91%]), and all minor complications resolved before hospital discharge. The presence (versus absence) of a perioperative complication was associated with lower mental health-related quality of life and higher depression symptoms 3-month postdonation; neither of these differences persisted at 12-month. Perioperative complications were not associated with any changes in physical health-related quality of life or anxiety 3-month postdonation. Limitations: Minor complications may have been missed and information on complications postdischarge were not collected. No minimal clinically significant change has been defined for kidney donors across the 3 measurements. Conclusions: These findings highlight a potential opportunity to better support the psychosocial needs of donors who experience perioperative complications in the months following donation. Trial registration: NCT00319579 and NCT00936078.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chris Nguan
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Neil Boudville
- Medical School, Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | | | - John S Gill
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | - Greg Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthew Miller
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jessica M Sontrop
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prasad GVR, Bhamidi V. Managing cardiovascular disease risk in South Asian kidney transplant recipients. World J Transplant 2021; 11:147-160. [PMID: 34164291 PMCID: PMC8218347 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i6.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
South Asians (SA) are at higher cardiovascular risk than other ethnic groups, and SA kidney transplant recipients (SA KTR) are no exception. SA KTR experience increased major adverse cardiovascular events both early and late post-transplantation. Cardiovascular risk management should therefore begin well before transplantation. SA candidates may require aggressive screening for pre-transplant cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to their ethnicity and comorbidities. Recording SA ethnicity during the pre-transplant evaluation may enable programs to better assess cardiovascular risk, thus allowing for earlier targeted peri- and post-transplant intervention to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Diabetes remains the most prominent post-transplant cardiovascular risk factor in SA KTR. Diabetes also clusters with other metabolic syndrome components including lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, higher triglycerides, hypertension, and central obesity in this population. Dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and obesity are all significant CVD risk factors in SA KTR, and contribute to increased insulin resistance. Novel biomarkers such as adiponectin, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) may be especially important to study in SA KTR. Focused interventions to improve health behaviors involving diet and exercise may especially benefit SA KTR. However, there are few interventional clinical trials specific to the SA population, and none are specific to SA KTR. In all cases, understanding the nuances of managing SA KTR as a distinct post-transplant group, while still screening for and managing each CVD risk factor individually in all patients may help improve the long-term success of all kidney transplant programs catering to multi-ethnic populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5C 2T2, ON, Canada
| | - Vaishnavi Bhamidi
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5C 2T2, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Herblum J, Dacouris N, Huang M, Zaltzman J, Prasad GVR, Nash M, Chen L. Retrospective Analysis of Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability as a Measure of Medication Adherence. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2021; 8:20543581211021742. [PMID: 34188946 PMCID: PMC8209833 DOI: 10.1177/20543581211021742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Increased intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus levels is associated with graft rejection, de novo donor-specific antibodies, and graft loss. Medication nonadherence may be a significant contributor to high IPV. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the utility of tacrolimus IPV in detecting nonadherence by examining the relationship between self-reported adherence and tacrolimus coefficient of variability (COV), a measure of IPV. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. Patients: All patients who were at least 1-year post-kidney transplant as of March 31, 2019, prescribed tacrolimus as an immunosuppressant and had a self-reported adherence status. Patients were excluded from the primary analysis of examining the correlation between COV and self-reported adherence if they lacked a calculatable COV. Measurements: Self-reported adherence, COV, demographic data, transplant, and medication history. Methods: A modified Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS) administered by healthcare professionals to assess self-reported adherence was used. The COV of tacrolimus trough levels was calculated and its correlation to BAASIS response was noted. The median COV was used as a cutoff to examine the characteristics of patients deemed “high COV” and “low COV.” Results: A total of 591 patients fit the initial criteria; however, only 525 had a recent calculatable COV. Overall, 92.38% of the population were adherent by self-report. Primary analysis identified a COV of 25.2% and 29.6% in self-reported adherent and nonadherent patients, respectively, though the result was not significant (P = .2). Secondary analyses showed a significant correlation between younger age at transplant and at the time of adherence self-reporting with nonadherence (P = .01). In addition, there was a strong correlation between those nonadherent with routine post-transplant blood work and younger age (P < .01). Limitations: The limitations included modified nonvalidated BAASIS questionnaire, social desirability bias, BAASIS only administered in English, and patients with graft failure not active in clinic not being captured. Conclusions: The COV should not be used as the sole method for determining medication adherence. However, COV may have some utility in capturing individuals who are not adherent to their blood work or patients who are having a poor response to tacrolimus and should be switched to another medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordana Herblum
- Keenan Research Summer Student Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Niki Dacouris
- Kidney and Metabolism Program, Unity Health Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Huang
- Kidney and Metabolism Program, Unity Health Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Zaltzman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Nash
- Kidney Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lucy Chen
- Kidney Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prasad GVR. Enhancing clinical judgement in virtual care for complex chronic disease. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:677-683. [PMID: 33559390 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed traditional in-person care into a new reality of virtual care for patients with complex chronic disease (CCD), but how has this transformation impacted clinical judgement? I argue that virtual specialist-patient interaction challenges clinical reasoning and clinical judgement (clinical reasoning combined with statistical reasoning). However, clinical reasoning can improve by recognising the abductive, deductive, and inductive methods that the clinician employs. Abductive reasoning leading to an inference to the best explanation or invention of an explanatory hypothesis is the default response to unfamiliar or confusing situations. Deductive reasoning supports a previously established goal, but deductive accuracy requires sound premises leading to a valid conclusion. Inductive reasoning uses efficient data sorting, data interpretation, and plan creation without a previously established goal, and allows assessing inferential accuracy over time. In all cases, communication remains the backbone of the clinical encounter. Virtual care for CCD challenges clinical judgement by reducing available information, so even experienced specialists who use induction might default to deduction or abduction. The visit might shorten, decreasing narrative competence and in-turn management quality. Clinical judgement in virtual encounters can be enhanced by allowing sufficient time, employing allied health staff, using an advance script, avoiding dogmatic commitment to either virtual or in-person encounters, special training in virtual care, and conscious awareness of abductive, deductive, and inductive reasoning processes. Clinical judgement in virtual encounters especially calls for Gestalt cognition to assess a situational pattern irreducible to its parts and independent of its particulars, so that efficient data interpretation and self-reflection are enabled. Gestalt cognition integrates abduction, deduction, and induction, appropriately divides the time and effort spent on each, and can compensate for reduced available information. Evaluating one's clinical judgement for those components especially vulnerable to compromise can help optimize the delivery of virtual care for patients with CCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Montada-Atin T, Prasad GVR. Recent advances in new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. World J Diabetes 2021; 12:541-555. [PMID: 33995843 PMCID: PMC8107982 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A common challenge in managing kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) or diabetes mellitus (DM) newly diagnosed after transplantation, in addition to known pre-existing DM. PTDM is an important risk factor for post-transplant cardiovascular (CV) disease, which adversely affects patient survival and quality of life. CV disease in KTR may manifest as ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and/or left ventricular hypertrophy. Available therapies for PTDM include most agents currently used to treat type 2 diabetes. More recently, the use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) has cautiously extended to KTR with PTDM, even though KTR are typically excluded from large general population clinical trials. Initial evidence from observational studies seems to indicate that SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and DPP4i may be safe and effective for glycemic control in KTR, but their benefit in reducing CV events in this otherwise high-risk population remains unproven. These newer drugs must still be used with care due to the increased propensity of KTR for intravascular volume depletion and acute kidney injury due to diarrhea and their single-kidney status, pre-existing burden of peripheral vascular disease, urinary tract infections due to immunosuppression and a surgically altered urinary tract, erythrocytosis from calcineurin inhibitors, and reduced kidney function from acute or chronic rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Montada-Atin
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5C 2T2, Ontario, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5C 2T2, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto M5C 2T2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Habbous S, Barnieh L, Litchfield K, McKenzie S, Reich M, Lam NN, Mucsi I, Bugeja A, Yohanna S, Mainra R, Chong K, Fantus D, Prasad GVR, Dipchand C, Gill J, Getchell L, Garg AX. A RAND-Modified Delphi on Key Indicators to Measure the Efficiency of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:1464-1473. [PMID: 32972951 PMCID: PMC7536753 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03780320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Many patients, providers, and potential living donors perceive the living kidney donor evaluation process to be lengthy and difficult to navigate. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We sought consensus on key terms and process and outcome indicators that can be used to measure how efficiently a transplant center evaluates persons interested in becoming a living kidney donor. Using a RAND-modified Delphi method, 77 participants (kidney transplant recipients or recipient candidates, living kidney donors or donor candidates, health care providers, and health care administrators) completed an online survey to define the terms and indicators. The definitions were then further refined during an in-person meeting with ten stakeholders. RESULTS We identified 16 process indicators (e.g., average time to evaluate a donor candidate), eight outcome indicators (e.g., annual number of preemptive living kidney donor transplants), and two measures that can be considered both process and outcome indicators (e.g., average number of times a candidate visited the transplant center for the evaluation). Transplant centers wishing to implement this set of indicators will require 22 unique data elements, all of which are either readily available or easily collected prospectively. CONCLUSIONS We identified a set of indicators through a consensus-based approach that may be used to monitor and improve the performance of a transplant center in how efficiently it evaluates persons interested in becoming a living kidney donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Habbous
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada .,Quality, Measurement, and Evaluation, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianne Barnieh
- Department of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Litchfield
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Susan McKenzie
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Marian Reich
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Kidney Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann Bugeja
- Division of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seychelle Yohanna
- Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Saskatchewan Transplant Program, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kate Chong
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Daniel Fantus
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Dipchand
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leah Getchell
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Every individual experiences good luck and bad luck. Three features characterize medical events associated with good luck or bad luck: There is no control over the event, the event occurs through chance or accident, and the event is of significant interest. These characteristics can be used to develop a working definition of medical luck. Medical good luck and medical bad luck are typically assigned to either the individual or to the event, but assigning these instead to the relationship between individual and event provides the opportunity for intervention. By assigning valences to each individual-event relationship and summating them, the total good luck or bad luck associated with the event can be determined. Intervening in the medical event by increasing the valence of the significance for each affected individual to the event will increase that event's total good luck. A total valence of zero before or after intervention does not, however, imply absent medical luck but simply a combination of medical good luck and medical bad luck because significance interest in the event persists. Therefore, there is no medical luck simpliciter, only medical good luck and medical bad luck. Medical events are especially helpful to understanding good luck and bad luck, because they are non-fictional, often generate significant interest, and are modifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Connelly PW, Yan AT, Nash MM, Lok CE, Gunaratnam L, Prasad GVR. Growth differentiation factor 15 is decreased by kidney transplantation. Clin Biochem 2019; 73:57-61. [PMID: 31361994 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is markedly increased in end-stage kidney disease and has been related to increased mortality in patients on dialysis. We hypothesized that kidney transplantation would decrease both GDF15 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and that GDF-15 decrease relates to post-kidney transplantation allograft function. METHODS End-stage kidney disease patients on dialysis awaiting a living donor kidney transplantation (n = 39), and those expected to be on the deceased donor waitlist for at least 12 months (n = 43) were enrolled at three transplant centers. Serum GDF15 and NT-proBNP were measured at 0, 3, and 12 months post-kidney transplantation or post-enrollment. Change in serum GDF15 and NT-proBNP concentrations, and their relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were assessed by non-parametric tests and regression analyses. RESULTS Median baseline GDF15 was 4744 pg/ml and 5451 pg/ml for the kidney transplantation and dialysis groups, respectively (p = 0.09). Kidney transplantation resulted in a significant decrease in GDF15 (month 12 median 1631 pg/ml, p < 0.0001 vs. baseline), whereas there was no change for the dialysis group (month 12 median 5658 pg/ml, p = 0.31). Post-kidney transplantation NT-proBNP highly correlated with GDF15 (ρ = 0.64, p < 0.0001). GDF15 inversely correlated with post-transplant eGFR for the kidney transplantation group (ρ = -0.42, p = 0.0081). Month 12 NT-proBNP explained 15.8% and 40.1% of the variance in month 12 GDF15 in the dialysis and kidney transplantation groups, respectively. The relationship of GDF15 with eGFR was no longer significant when NT-proBNP was included in the models. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplantation significantly decreases serum GDF15 concentrations. The post-kidney transplantation association of GDF15 with NT-proBNP is consistent with a gradient of post- kidney transplantation cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip W Connelly
- Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto and Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Sciences of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Andrew T Yan
- University of Toronto, Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michelle M Nash
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Charmaine E Lok
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lakshman Gunaratnam
- Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- University of Toronto, Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Garcia-Ochoa C, Feldman LS, Nguan C, Monroy-Cuadros M, Arnold J, Boudville N, Cuerden M, Dipchand C, Eng M, Gill J, Gourlay W, Karpinski M, Klarenbach S, Knoll G, Lentine KL, Lok CE, Luke P, Prasad GVR, Sener A, Sontrop JM, Storsley L, Treleaven D, Garg AX. Perioperative Complications During Living Donor Nephrectomy: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019; 6:2054358119857718. [PMID: 31367455 PMCID: PMC6643179 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119857718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While living kidney donation is considered safe in healthy individuals, perioperative complications can occur due to several factors. OBJECTIVE We explored associations between the incidence of perioperative complications and donor characteristics, surgical technique, and surgeon's experience in a large contemporary cohort of living kidney donors. DESIGN Living kidney donors enrolled prospectively in a multicenter cohort study with some data collected retrospectively after enrollment was complete (eg, surgeon characteristics). SETTING Living kidney donor centers in Canada (n = 12) and Australia (n = 5). PATIENTS Living kidney donors who donated between 2004 and 2014 and the surgeons who performed the living kidney donor nephrectomies. MEASUREMENTS Operative and hospital discharge medical notes were collected prospectively, with data on perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) information abstracted from notes after enrollment was complete. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo system and further classified into minor and major. In 2016, surgeons who performed the nephrectomies were invited to fill an online survey on their training and experience. METHODS Multivariable logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to compare perioperative complication rates between different groups of donors. The effect of surgeon characteristics on the complication rate was explored using a similar approach. Poisson regression was used to test rates of overall perioperative complications between high- and low-volume centers. RESULTS Of the 1421 living kidney donor candidates, 1042 individuals proceeded with donation, where 134 (13% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11%-15%]) experienced 142 perioperative complications (55 intraoperative; 87 postoperative). The most common intraoperative complication was organ injury and the most common postoperative complication was ileus. No donors died in the perioperative period. Most complications were minor (90% of 142 complications [95% CI: 86%-96%]); however, 12 donors (1% of 1042 [95% CI: 1%-2%]) experienced a major complication. No statistically significant differences were observed between donor groups and the rate of complications. A total of 43 of 48 eligible surgeons (90%) completed the online survey. Perioperative complication rates did not vary significantly by surgeon characteristics or by high- versus low-volume centers. LIMITATIONS Operative and discharge reporting is not standardized and varies among surgeons. It is possible that some complications were missed. The online survey for surgeons was completed retrospectively, was based on self-report, and has not been validated. We had adequate statistical power only to detect large effects for factors associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the safety of living kidney donation as evidenced by the low rate of major perioperative complications. We did not identify any donor or surgeon characteristics associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS NCT00319579: A Prospective Study of Living Kidney Donation (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00319579)NCT00936078: Living Kidney Donor Study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00936078).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Garcia-Ochoa
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Christopher Nguan
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer Arnold
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Boudville
- Medical School, The University of
Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Meaghan Cuerden
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Dipchand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Michael Eng
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - John Gill
- Division of Nephrology, The University
of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - William Gourlay
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Martin Karpinski
- Department of Medicine, University of
Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Greg Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ON, Canada
| | - Krista L. Lentine
- Centre for Abdominal Transplantation,
Saint Louis University School of Medicine, MO, USA
| | | | - Patrick Luke
- Department of Urology, Western
University, London, ON, Canada
| | - G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alp Sener
- Department of Urology, Western
University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica M. Sontrop
- Department of Epidemiology &
Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Leroy Storsley
- Department of Internal Medicine,
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Darin Treleaven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Amit X. Garg
- Division of Nephrology, Department of
Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cockfield SM, Wilson S, Campbell PM, Cantarovich M, Gangji A, Houde I, Jevnikar AM, Keough‐Ryan TM, Monroy‐Cuadros F, Nickerson PW, Pâquet MR, Ramesh Prasad GV, Senécal L, Shoker A, Wolff J, Howell J, Schwartz JJ, Rush DN. Comparison of the effects of standard vs low-dose prolonged-release tacrolimus with or without ACEi/ARB on the histology and function of renal allografts. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:1730-1744. [PMID: 30582281 PMCID: PMC6590452 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Targeting the renin-angiotensin system and optimizing tacrolimus exposure are both postulated to improve outcomes in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) by preventing interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). In this multicenter, prospective, open-label controlled trial, adult de novo RTRs were randomized in a 2 × 2 design to low- vs standard-dose (LOW vs STD) prolonged-release tacrolimus and to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor 1 blockers (ACEi/ARBs) vs other antihypertensive therapy (OAHT). There were 2 coprimary endpoints: the prevalence of IF/TA at month 6 and at month 24. IF/TA prevalence was similar for LOW vs STD tacrolimus at month 6 (36.8% vs 39.5%; P = .80) and ACEi/ARBs vs OAHT at month 24 (54.8% vs 58.2%; P = .33). IF/TA progression decreased significantly with LOW vs STD tacrolimus at month 24 (mean [SD] change, +0.42 [1.477] vs +1.10 [1.577]; P = .0039). Across the 4 treatment groups, LOW + ACEi/ARB patients exhibited the lowest mean IF/TA change and, compared with LOW + OAHT patients, experienced significantly delayed time to first T cell-mediated rejection. Renal function was stable from month 1 to month 24 in all treatment groups. No unexpected safety findings were detected. Coupled with LOW tacrolimus dosing, ACEi/ARBs appear to reduce IF/TA progression and delay rejection relative to reduced tacrolimus exposure without renin-angiotensin system blockade. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00933231.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sam Wilson
- Astellas Pharma Global DevelopmentNorthbrookIllinois
| | | | | | - Azim Gangji
- St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Howell
- Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.MarkhamOntarioCanada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Barnieh L, Klarenbach S, Arnold J, Cuerden M, Knoll G, Lok C, Sontrop JM, Miller M, Ramesh Prasad GV, Przech S, Garg AX. Nonreimbursed Costs Incurred by Living Kidney Donors: A Case Study From Ontario, Canada. Transplantation 2019; 103:e164-e171. [PMID: 31246933 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donors may incur out-of-pocket costs during the donation process. While many jurisdictions have programs to reimburse living kidney donors for expenses, few programs have been evaluated. METHODS The Program for Reimbursing Expenses of Living Organ Donors was launched in the province of Ontario, Canada in 2008 and reimburses travel, parking, accommodation, meals, and loss of income; each category has a limit and the maximum total reimbursement is $5500 CAD. We conducted a case study to compare donors' incurred costs (out-of-pocket and lost income) with amounts reimbursed by Program for Reimbursing Expenses of Living Organ Donors. Donors with complete or partial cost data from a large prospective cohort study were linked to Ontario's reimbursement program to determine the gap between incurred and reimbursed costs (n = 159). RESULTS The mean gap between costs incurred and costs reimbursed to the donors was $1313 CAD for out-of-pocket costs and $1802 CAD for lost income, representing a mean reimbursement gap of $3115 CAD. Nondirected donors had the highest mean loss for out-of-pocket costs ($2691 CAD) and kidney paired donors had the highest mean loss for lost income ($4084 CAD). There were no significant differences in the mean gap across exploratory subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Reimbursement programs minimize some of the financial loss for living kidney donors. Opportunities remain to remove the financial burden of living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Barnieh
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Scott Klarenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Arnold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Meaghan Cuerden
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Greg Knoll
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Charmaine Lok
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica M Sontrop
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Miller
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sebastian Przech
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Malyala R, Rapi L, Nash MM, Prasad GVR. Serum Apolipoprotein B and A1 Concentrations Predict Late-Onset Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus in Prevalent Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019; 6:2054358119850536. [PMID: 31205732 PMCID: PMC6535897 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119850536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Glucose metabolism links closely to cholesterol metabolism. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) adversely affects posttransplant outcomes, but its risk factors in relation to cholesterol metabolism have not been fully delineated. The apolipoprotein B/A1 (Apo B/A1) ratio, which is associated with insulin resistance, has not been evaluated in kidney transplant recipients as a risk factor for PTDM. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether serum apolipoprotein profiles predict late PTDM, defined as a new onset diabetes occurring greater than 3 months posttransplant. Design Retrospective chart review of a prevalent population of kidney transplant recipients. Setting Large transplant center in Ontario, Canada. Patients We identified 1104 previously nondiabetic adults who received a kidney transplant between January 1, 1998, and December 1, 2015, and were followed at 1 transplant center. Measurements Recipients provided testing for serum apolipoprotein B (Apo B) and apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) concentrations from 2010, either at 3 months posttransplant for new transplant recipients or the next clinic visit for prevalent recipients. Late PTDM defined using Canadian Diabetes Association criteria as occurring ≥3 months posttransplant was recorded until May 1, 2016. Methods All analyses were conducted with R, version 3.4.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Comparisons were made using Student t test, Fisher exact test or chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier methodology with the logrank test, or Cox proportional hazards analysis as appropriate. Covariates for the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models of PTDM as the outcome variable were selected based on significance of the univariate associations and biological plausibility. Results There were 53 incident late PTDM cases, or 1.71 cases per 100 patient-years. Incident late PTDM differed between the highest and lowest quartiles for Apo B/A1 ratio, 2.47 per 100 patient-years vs 0.88 per 100 patient-years (P = .005 for difference). In multiple Cox regression analysis, first measured serum Apo B/A1 concentration better predicted subsequent PTDM than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; hazard ratio [HR] = 7.80 per unit increase, P = .039 vs HR = 1.05 per unit increase, P = .774). Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations also did not predict PTDM (P = .136). By contrast to Apo B, Apo A1 was protective against PTDM in statin users (HR = 0.17 per unit increase, P = .016). Limitations Posttransplant diabetes mellitus cases occurring before apolipoprotein testing was implemented were not included in the analysis. Conclusions Apolipoproteins B and A1 better predict late PTDM than conventional markers of cholesterol metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Malyala
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lindita Rapi
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle M Nash
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Prasad GVR, Beckley J, Mathur M, Gunasekaran M, Nash MM, Rapi L, Huang M, Zaltzman JS. Safety and efficacy of prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia involving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole dose reduction in kidney transplantation. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19:311. [PMID: 30953458 PMCID: PMC6451305 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-3944-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the drug of choice for anti-Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PcP) prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Post-transplant management balances preventing PcP with managing TMP-SMX-related adverse effects. TMP-SMX dose reduction addresses adverse effects but its implications to incident PcP are unclear. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients transplanted between 2011 and 2015 prescribed daily single strength TMP-SMX for twelve months post-transplantation as PcP prophylaxis. Actual TMP-SMX dose and duration, adverse effects, number of dose reductions and reasons, and PcP events were captured. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for risk factors associated with dose reduction were performed. Results Of 438 KTR, 233 (53%) maintained daily TMP-SMX and 205 (47%) sustained ≥1 dose reduction, with the point prevalence of a reduced dose regimen being between 18 and 25%. Median duration for daily TMP-SMX was 8.45/12 months, contributing 4137 patient-months daily TMP-SMX and 1110 patient-months with a reduced dose. PcP did not occur in any patients. There were 84 documented dose reductions for hyperkalemia and 102 for leukopenia, with 12 and 7 patients requiring TMP-SMX cessation. In multivariate analysis, a living donor transplant protected against hyperkalemia (Odds Ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.83, p < 0.01) while acute rejection risked leukopenia (Odds Ratio 3.31, 95% CI 1.39–7.90, p = 0.006). Conclusions TMP-SMX dose reduction is frequent in the first post-transplant year but PcP does not occur. To limit the need for TMP-SMX dose reduction due to adverse effects, a clinical trial comparing daily to thrice weekly single strength TMP-SMX in de-novo KTR is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5C 2T2, Canada.
| | - Jill Beckley
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5C 2T2, Canada
| | - Mohit Mathur
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Michelle M Nash
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5C 2T2, Canada
| | - Lindita Rapi
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5C 2T2, Canada
| | - Michael Huang
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5C 2T2, Canada
| | - Jeffrey S Zaltzman
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5C 2T2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Malyala R, Rapi L, Nash MM, Prasad GVR. Pre-Transplant Left Ventricular Geometry and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Kidney Transplantation. Ann Transplant 2019; 24:100-107. [PMID: 30787265 PMCID: PMC6397615 DOI: 10.12659/aot.913649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after kidney transplantation motivates pre-transplant cardiac evaluation that includes two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The relationship of relative wall thickness (RWT) to left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in predicting post-transplant MACE is unclear. Material/Methods In this multi-ethnic Canadian single-center cohort study, we identified 1063 adults undergoing pre-transplant TTE within 1 year pre-transplant and with minimum 6 months of post-kidney transplant follow-up for MACE, defined as a composite of coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac death. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, >131 g/m2 in men and >100 g/m2 in women) and increased RWT (>0.45) were a priori used to define normal (no LVH, normal RWT), concentric remodeling (no LVH, increased RWT), eccentric hypertrophy (LVH, normal RWT), and concentric hypertrophy (LVH, increased RWT). Results There were 134 MACE over 3577 patient-years of post-transplant follow-up. Both LVH (HR 1.58, p=0.022) and high RWT (HR 1.44, p=0.041) predicted MACE in multivariate survival regression analysis independently of common pre-transplant MACE risk factors. Concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, and eccentric hypertrophy all increased the risk for MACE (4.44, 5.05, and 5.55 events per 100 patient-years, respectively) versus normal echocardiography (2.71 events per 100 patient-years, all p<0.05 for difference). In Cox interactive regression analysis, LVMI and RWT were independently associated with MACE (p=0.015, p=0.025) and significantly interacted (p=0.008). Conclusions LV geometric parameters beyond LVH alone can assist post-transplant prognostication in kidney transplant candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Malyala
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lindita Rapi
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle M Nash
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Kidney Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gong IY, Al-Amro B, Prasad GVR, Connelly PW, Wald RM, Wald R, Deva DP, Leong-Poi H, Nash MM, Yuan W, Gunaratnam L, Kim SJ, Lok CE, Connelly KA, Yan AT. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance left ventricular strain in end-stage renal disease patients after kidney transplantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018; 20:83. [PMID: 30554567 PMCID: PMC6296102 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-018-0504-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and kidney transplant (KT) patients. Compared with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), LV strain has emerged as an important marker of LV function as it is less load dependent. We sought to evaluate changes in LV strain using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in ESRD patients who received KT, to determine whether KT may improve LV function. METHODS We conducted a prospective multi-centre longitudinal study of 79 ESRD patients (40 on dialysis, 39 underwent KT). CMR was performed at baseline and at 12 months after KT. RESULTS Among 79 participants (mean age 55 years; 30% women), KT patients had significant improvement in global circumferential strain (GCS) (p = 0.007) and global radial strain (GRS) (p = 0.003), but a decline in global longitudinal strain (GLS) over 12 months (p = 0.026), while no significant change in any LV strain was observed in the ongoing dialysis group. For KT patients, the improvement in LV strain paralleled improvement in LVEF (57.4 ± 6.4% at baseline, 60.6% ± 6.9% at 12 months; p = 0.001). For entire cohort, over 12 months, change in LVEF was significantly correlated with change in GCS (Spearman's r = - 0.42, p < 0.001), GRS (Spearman's r = 0.64, p < 0.001), and GLS (Spearman's r = - 0.34, p = 0.002). Improvements in GCS and GRS over 12 months were significantly correlated with reductions in LV end-diastolic volume index and LV end-systolic volume index (all p < 0.05), but not with change in blood pressure (all p > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS Compared with continuation of dialysis, KT was associated with significant improvements in LV strain metrics of GCS and GRS after 12 months, which did not correlate with blood pressure change. This supports the notion that KT has favorable effects on LV function beyond volume and blood pessure control. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bandar Al-Amro
- Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Philip W. Connelly
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rachel M. Wald
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ron Wald
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Djeven P. Deva
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Howard Leong-Poi
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michelle M. Nash
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Weiqiu Yuan
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Lakshman Gunaratnam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - S. Joseph Kim
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Charmaine E. Lok
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kim A. Connelly
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew T. Yan
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Rm 6-030 Donnelly, Toronto, M5B 1W8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Prasad GVR, Yan AT, Nash MM, Kim SJ, Wald R, Wald R, Lok C, Gunaratnam L, Karur GR, Kirpalani A, Connelly PW. Determinants of Left Ventricular Characteristics Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cardiovascular Biomarkers Related to Kidney Transplantation. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2018; 5:2054358118809974. [PMID: 30542623 PMCID: PMC6236646 DOI: 10.1177/2054358118809974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging accurately and precisely measures
left ventricular (LV) mass and function. Identifying mechanisms by which LV
mass change and functional improvement occur in some end-stage kidney
disease (ESKD) patients may help to appropriately target kidney transplant
(KT) recipients for further investigation and intervention. The
concentration of serum adiponectin, a cardiovascular biomarker, increases in
cardiac failure, its production being enhanced by B-type natriuretic peptide
(BNP), and both serum adiponectin and BNP concentrations decline
posttransplantation. Objective: We tested the hypothesis that kidney transplantation alters LV
characteristics that relate to serum adiponectin concentrations. Design: Prospective and observational cohort study. Setting: The study was performed at 3 adult kidney transplant and dialysis centers in
Ontario, Canada. Patients: A total of 82 KT candidate subjects were recruited (39 to the KT group and 43
to the dialysis group). Predialysis patients were excluded. Measurements: Subjects underwent CMR with a 1.5-tesla whole-body magnetic resonance scanner
using a phased-array cardiac coil and retrospective vectorographic gating.
LV mass, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV
end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were measured by CMR pre-KT and again 12 months
post-KT (N = 39), or 12 months later if still receiving dialysis (N = 43).
LV mass, LVESV, and LVEDV were indexed for height (m2.7) to
calculate left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular end-systolic
volume index (LVESVI), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index
(LVEDVI), respectively. Serum total adiponectin and N-terminal proBNP
(NT-proBNP) concentrations were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 12
months. Methods: We performed a prospective 1:1 observational study comparing KT candidates
with ESKD either receiving a living donor organ (KT group) or waiting for a
deceased donor organ (dialysis group). Results: Left ventricular mass index change was −1.98 ± 5.5 and −0.36 ± 5.7
g/m2.7 for KT versus dialysis subjects (P =
.44). Left ventricular mass change was associated with systolic blood
pressure (SBP) (P = .0008) and average LV mass
(P = .0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not
improve (2.9 ± 6.6 vs 0.7 ± 4.9 %, P = .09), while LVESVI
and LVEDVI decreased more post-KT than with continued dialysis (−3.36 ± 5.6
vs −0.22 ± 4.4 mL/m2.7, P < .01 and −4.9 ±
8.5 vs −0.3 ± 9.2 mL/m2.7, P = .02). Both
adiponectin (−7.1 ± 11.3 vs −0.11 ± 7.9 µg/mL, P <
.0001) and NT-proBNP (−3811 ± 8130 vs 1665 ± 20013 pg/mL, P
< .0001) declined post-KT. Post-KT adiponectin correlated with NT-proBNP
(P = .001), but not estimated glomerular filtration
rate (eGFR) (P = .13). Change in adiponectin did not
correlate with change in LVEF in the KT group (Spearman ρ = 0.16,
P = .31) or dialysis group (Spearman ρ = 0.19,
P = .21). Limitations: Few biomarkers of cardiac function were measured to fully contextualize their
role during changing kidney function. Limited intrapatient biomarker
sampling and CMR measurements precluded constructing dose-response curves of
biomarkers to LV mass and function. The CMR timing in relation to dialysis
was not standardized. Conclusions: The LVESVI and LVEDVI but not LVMI or LVEF improve post-KT. LVMI and LVEF
change is independent of renal function and adiponectin. As adiponectin
correlates with NT-proBNP post-KT, improved renal function through KT
restores the normal heart-endocrine axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew T Yan
- Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle M Nash
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Joseph Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ron Wald
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Wald
- Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charmaine Lok
- Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lakshman Gunaratnam
- Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, ON, Canada
| | - Gauri R Karur
- Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anish Kirpalani
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philip W Connelly
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Przech S, Garg AX, Arnold JB, Barnieh L, Cuerden MS, Dipchand C, Feldman L, Gill JS, Karpinski M, Knoll G, Lok C, Miller M, Monroy M, Nguan C, Prasad GVR, Sarma S, Sontrop JM, Storsley L, Klarenbach S. Financial Costs Incurred by Living Kidney Donors: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:2847-2857. [PMID: 30404908 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018040398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 40% of the kidneys for transplant worldwide come from living donors. Despite advantages of living donor transplants, rates have stagnated in recent years. One possible barrier may be costs related to the transplant process that potential willing donors may incur for travel, parking, accommodation, and lost productivity. METHODS To better understand and quantify the financial costs incurred by living kidney donors, we conducted a prospective cohort study, recruiting 912 living kidney donors from 12 transplant centers across Canada between 2009 and 2014; 821 of them completed all or a portion of the costing survey. We report microcosted total, out-of-pocket, and lost productivity costs (in 2016 Canadian dollars) for living kidney donors from donor evaluation start to 3 months after donation. We examined costs according to (1) the donor's relationship with their recipient, including spousal (donation to a partner), emotionally related nonspousal (friend, step-parent, in law), or genetically related; and (2) donation type (directed, paired kidney, or nondirected). RESULTS Living kidney donors incurred a median (75th percentile) of $1254 ($2589) in out-of-pocket costs and $0 ($1908) in lost productivity costs. On average, total costs were $2226 higher in spousal compared with emotionally related nonspousal donors (P=0.02) and $1664 higher in directed donors compared with nondirected donors (P<0.001). Total costs (out-of-pocket and lost productivity) exceeded $5500 for 205 (25%) donors. CONCLUSIONS Our results can be used to inform strategies to minimize the financial burden of living donation, which may help improve the donation experience and increase the number of living donor kidney transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Przech
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer B Arnold
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianne Barnieh
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meaghan S Cuerden
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Dipchand
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Liane Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - John S Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Karpinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Greg Knoll
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charmaine Lok
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Miller
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mauricio Monroy
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Chris Nguan
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
| | - Sisira Sarma
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica M Sontrop
- Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leroy Storsley
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Scott Klarenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Living donors are the preferred source of organs for kidney transplantation, which is the treatment modality of choice for end-stage kidney disease. Health care systems widely promote living kidney donation. However, women are consistently overrepresented among living donors. The reasons behind the sex-based disparity in living kidney donation remain poorly understood. Compared to women, men possess a greater amount of kidney function, and the higher deceased donation rate among men reflects their higher overall kidney quality. A plausible medical explanation for the sex-based disparity in living kidney donation includes an uncompromising emphasis on preserving donor health, with less emphasis placed on organ quality, which is the main criterion in deceased donor selection. On the other hand, consent to deceased donation is also greater in women, indicating their greater desire to donate even though fewer women actually become deceased donors. Therefore, nonmedical reasons for the sex disparity in living donation must be sought. Increased empathic distress or emotional memory; a greater sense of responsibility, urgency, and impulsiveness with increased reaction to empathy; a different body image; and a different social status may all contribute to greater living kidney donation in women. Economic inequity may be the singular explanation when personal worth links to economic worth. To better understand the sex disparity in living kidney donation, we need better data on the reasons behind both nondonation and donor rejection after evaluation in clinical practice. Nondirected living kidney donation provides unique opportunities to minimize factors such as emotional distress, empathy, and impulsiveness. More liberal acceptance criteria for donors with isolated medical abnormalities and testing legitimate donor reimbursement strategies based on actual income levels rather than a fixed amount can assist in both ascertaining the reasons behind the sex disparity in living kidney donation and increasing overall living kidney donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Habbous S, Arnold J, Begen MA, Boudville N, Cooper M, Dipchand C, Dixon SN, Feldman LS, Goździk D, Karpinski M, Klarenbach S, Knoll GA, Lam NN, Lentine KL, Lok C, McArthur E, McKenzie S, Miller M, Monroy-Cuadros M, Nguan C, Prasad GVR, Przech S, Sarma S, Segev DL, Storsley L, Garg AX. Duration of Living Kidney Transplant Donor Evaluations: Findings From 2 Multicenter Cohort Studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 72:483-498. [PMID: 29580662 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A prolonged living kidney donor evaluation may result in worse outcomes for transplant recipients. Better knowledge of the duration of this process may help inform future donors and identify opportunities for improvement. STUDY DESIGN 1 prospective and 1 retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS At 16 Canadian and Australian transplantation centers (prospective cohort) and 5 Ontario transplantation centers (retrospective cohort), we assessed the duration of living kidney donor evaluation and explored donor, recipient, and transplantation factors associated with longer evaluation times. Data were obtained from 2 sources: donor medical records using chart abstraction and health care administrative databases. PREDICTORS Donor and recipient demographics, direct versus paired donation, center-level variables. OUTCOMES Duration of living donor evaluation. RESULTS The median total duration of transplantation evaluation (time from when the candidate started the evaluation until donation) was 10.3 (IQR, 6.5-16.7) months. The median duration from evaluation start until approval to donate was 7.9 (IQR, 4.6-14.1) months, and from approval until donation was 0.7 (IQR, 0.3-2.4) months, respectively. The median time between the first and last consultation among donors who completed a nephrology, surgery, and psychosocial assessment in the prospective cohort was 3.0 (IQR, 1.0-6.3) months, and between computed tomography angiography and donation was 4.8 (IQR, 2.6-9.2) months. After adjustment, the total duration of transplantation evaluation was longer if the donor participated in paired donation (6.6 [95% CI, 1.6-9.7] months) and if the recipient was referred later relative to the donor's evaluation start date (0.9 [95% CI, 0.8-1.0] months [per month of delayed referral]). Results depended on whether the recipient was receiving dialysis. LIMITATIONS Living donor candidates who did not donate were not included and proxy measures were used for some dates in the donor evaluation process. CONCLUSIONS The duration of kidney transplant donor evaluation is variable and can be lengthy. Better understanding of the reasons for a prolonged evaluation may inform quality improvement initiatives to reduce unnecessary delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Habbous
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mehmet A Begen
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Ivey School of Business, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Boudville
- University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - Stephanie N Dixon
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Greg A Knoll
- Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Centre for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Eric McArthur
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Chris Nguan
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sebastian Przech
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sisira Sarma
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Leroy Storsley
- Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Tacrolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressant after kidney transplantation. It has a narrow therapeutic range and demonstrates wide interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics, leading to potential underimmunosuppression or toxicity. Genetic polymorphism in CYP3A5 enzyme expression contributes to differences in tacrolimus bioavailability between individuals. Individuals carrying one or more copies of the wild-type allele *1 express CYP3A5, which increases tacrolimus clearance. CYP3A5 expressers require 1.5 to 2-fold higher tacrolimus doses compared to usual dosing to achieve therapeutic blood concentrations. Individuals with homozygous *3/*3 genotype are CYP3A5 nonexpressers. CYP3A5 nonexpression is the most frequent phenotype in most ethnic populations, except blacks. Differences between CYP3A5 genotypes in tacrolimus disposition have not translated into differences in clinical outcomes, such as acute rejection and graft survival. Therefore, although genotype-based dosing may improve achievement of therapeutic drug concentrations with empiric dosing, its role in clinical practice is unclear. CYP3A5 genotype may predict differences in absorption of extended-release and immediate-release oral formulations of tacrolimus. Two studies found that CYP3A5 expressers require higher doses of tacrolimus in the extended-release formulation compared to immediate release. CYP3A5 genotype plays a role in determining the impact of interacting drugs, such as fluconazole, on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Evidence conflicts regarding the impact of CYP3A5 genotype on risk of nephrotoxicity associated with tacrolimus. Further study is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Chen
- Kidney Transplant Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nerenberg KA, Zarnke KB, Leung AA, Dasgupta K, Butalia S, McBrien K, Harris KC, Nakhla M, Cloutier L, Gelfer M, Lamarre-Cliche M, Milot A, Bolli P, Tremblay G, McLean D, Padwal RS, Tran KC, Grover S, Rabkin SW, Moe GW, Howlett JG, Lindsay P, Hill MD, Sharma M, Field T, Wein TH, Shoamanesh A, Dresser GK, Hamet P, Herman RJ, Burgess E, Gryn SE, Grégoire JC, Lewanczuk R, Poirier L, Campbell TS, Feldman RD, Lavoie KL, Tsuyuki RT, Honos G, Prebtani APH, Kline G, Schiffrin EL, Don-Wauchope A, Tobe SW, Gilbert RE, Leiter LA, Jones C, Woo V, Hegele RA, Selby P, Pipe A, McFarlane PA, Oh P, Gupta M, Bacon SL, Kaczorowski J, Trudeau L, Campbell NRC, Hiremath S, Roerecke M, Arcand J, Ruzicka M, Prasad GVR, Vallée M, Edwards C, Sivapalan P, Penner SB, Fournier A, Benoit G, Feber J, Dionne J, Magee LA, Logan AG, Côté AM, Rey E, Firoz T, Kuyper LM, Gabor JY, Townsend RR, Rabi DM, Daskalopoulou SS. Hypertension Canada's 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children. Can J Cardiol 2018; 34:506-525. [PMID: 29731013 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 409] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension Canada provides annually updated, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults and children. This year, the adult and pediatric guidelines are combined in one document. The new 2018 pregnancy-specific hypertension guidelines are published separately. For 2018, 5 new guidelines are introduced, and 1 existing guideline on the blood pressure thresholds and targets in the setting of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is revised. The use of validated wrist devices for the estimation of blood pressure in individuals with large arm circumference is now included. Guidance is provided for the follow-up measurements of blood pressure, with the use of standardized methods and electronic (oscillometric) upper arm devices in individuals with hypertension, and either ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring in individuals with white coat effect. We specify that all individuals with hypertension should have an assessment of global cardiovascular risk to promote health behaviours that lower blood pressure. Finally, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor combination should be used in place of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in individuals with heart failure (with ejection fraction < 40%) who are symptomatic despite appropriate doses of guideline-directed heart failure therapies. The specific evidence and rationale underlying each of these guidelines are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara A Nerenberg
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Kelly B Zarnke
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health and Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alexander A Leung
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kaberi Dasgupta
- Department of Medicine and Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sonia Butalia
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kerry McBrien
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kevin C Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Meranda Nakhla
- Department of Medicine and Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lyne Cloutier
- Department of Nursing, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark Gelfer
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Alain Milot
- Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Bolli
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Guy Tremblay
- CHU-Québec-Hopital St. Sacrement, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Donna McLean
- Alberta Health Services and Covenant Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Raj S Padwal
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen C Tran
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Steven Grover
- McGill Comprehensive Health Improvement Program (CHIP), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon W Rabkin
- Vancouver Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gordon W Moe
- St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan G Howlett
- Departments of Medicine and Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Patrice Lindsay
- Director of Stroke, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Adjunct Faculty, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mike Sharma
- McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thalia Field
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver Stroke Program, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Theodore H Wein
- McGill University, Stroke Prevention Clinic, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ashkan Shoamanesh
- McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - George K Dresser
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pavel Hamet
- Faculté de Médicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert J Herman
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ellen Burgess
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven E Gryn
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean C Grégoire
- Université de Montréal, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Richard Lewanczuk
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Luc Poirier
- Institut National d'Excellence en Sante et Services Sociaux, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tavis S Campbell
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ross D Feldman
- Winnipeg Regional Health Authority and the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kim L Lavoie
- University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ross T Tsuyuki
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - George Honos
- CHUM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ally P H Prebtani
- Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Kline
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Sheldon W Tobe
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, and Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard E Gilbert
- University of Toronto, Division of Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence A Leiter
- University of Toronto, Division of Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlotte Jones
- Department of Medicine, UBC Southern Medical Program, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vincent Woo
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Robert A Hegele
- Departments of Medicine (Division of Endocrinology) and Biochemistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Selby
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Pipe
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philip A McFarlane
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Oh
- University Health Network, Toronto Rehab and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Milan Gupta
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, and Canadian Collaborative Research Network, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon L Bacon
- Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, and Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janusz Kaczorowski
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal and CRCHUM, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Luc Trudeau
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Norman R C Campbell
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Swapnil Hiremath
- University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Roerecke
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Arcand
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcel Ruzicka
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michel Vallée
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cedric Edwards
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Praveena Sivapalan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Anne Fournier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Geneviève Benoit
- Service de néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janusz Feber
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janis Dionne
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laura A Magee
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, London, and Department of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Evelyne Rey
- CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tabassum Firoz
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Laura M Kuyper
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jonathan Y Gabor
- Interlake-Eastern Regional Healthy Authority, Concordia Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Raymond R Townsend
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Doreen M Rabi
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stella S Daskalopoulou
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Leung AA, Daskalopoulou SS, Dasgupta K, McBrien K, Butalia S, Zarnke KB, Nerenberg K, Harris KC, Nakhla M, Cloutier L, Gelfer M, Lamarre-Cliche M, Milot A, Bolli P, Tremblay G, McLean D, Tran KC, Tobe SW, Ruzicka M, Burns KD, Vallée M, Prasad GVR, Gryn SE, Feldman RD, Selby P, Pipe A, Schiffrin EL, McFarlane PA, Oh P, Hegele RA, Khara M, Wilson TW, Penner SB, Burgess E, Sivapalan P, Herman RJ, Bacon SL, Rabkin SW, Gilbert RE, Campbell TS, Grover S, Honos G, Lindsay P, Hill MD, Coutts SB, Gubitz G, Campbell NRC, Moe GW, Howlett JG, Boulanger JM, Prebtani A, Kline G, Leiter LA, Jones C, Côté AM, Woo V, Kaczorowski J, Trudeau L, Tsuyuki RT, Hiremath S, Drouin D, Lavoie KL, Hamet P, Grégoire JC, Lewanczuk R, Dresser GK, Sharma M, Reid D, Lear SA, Moullec G, Gupta M, Magee LA, Logan AG, Dionne J, Fournier A, Benoit G, Feber J, Poirier L, Padwal RS, Rabi DM. Hypertension Canada's 2017 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults. Can J Cardiol 2017; 33:557-576. [PMID: 28449828 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hypertension Canada provides annually updated, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. This year, we introduce 10 new guidelines. Three previous guidelines have been revised and 5 have been removed. Previous age and frailty distinctions have been removed as considerations for when to initiate antihypertensive therapy. In the presence of macrovascular target organ damage, or in those with independent cardiovascular risk factors, antihypertensive therapy should be considered for all individuals with elevated average systolic nonautomated office blood pressure (non-AOBP) readings ≥ 140 mm Hg. For individuals with diastolic hypertension (with or without systolic hypertension), fixed-dose single-pill combinations are now recommended as an initial treatment option. Preference is given to pills containing an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in combination with either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic. Whenever a diuretic is selected as monotherapy, longer-acting agents are preferred. In patients with established ischemic heart disease, caution should be exercised in lowering diastolic non-AOBP to ≤ 60 mm Hg, especially in the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy. After a hemorrhagic stroke, in the first 24 hours, systolic non-AOBP lowering to < 140 mm Hg is not recommended. Finally, guidance is now provided for screening, initial diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of renovascular hypertension arising from fibromuscular dysplasia. The specific evidence and rationale underlying each of these guidelines are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Leung
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Stella S Daskalopoulou
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kaberi Dasgupta
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kerry McBrien
- Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sonia Butalia
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kelly B Zarnke
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kara Nerenberg
- Department of Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kevin C Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Meranda Nakhla
- Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lyne Cloutier
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark Gelfer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, Copeman Healthcare Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maxime Lamarre-Cliche
- Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Milot
- Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Bolli
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Guy Tremblay
- CHU-Québec-Hopital St Sacrement, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Donna McLean
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Marcel Ruzicka
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin D Burns
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michel Vallée
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Steven E Gryn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ross D Feldman
- Discipline of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
| | - Peter Selby
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Pipe
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ernesto L Schiffrin
- Department of Medicine and Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philip A McFarlane
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Oh
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert A Hegele
- Departments of Medicine (Division of Endocrinology) and Biochemistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Milan Khara
- Vancouver Coastal Health Addiction Services, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas W Wilson
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - S Brian Penner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ellen Burgess
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Praveena Sivapalan
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Robert J Herman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Simon L Bacon
- Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, and Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon W Rabkin
- Vancouver Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Richard E Gilbert
- University of Toronto, Division of Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tavis S Campbell
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Grover
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - George Honos
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrice Lindsay
- Stroke, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelagh B Coutts
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gord Gubitz
- Division of Neurology, Halifax Infirmary, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Norman R C Campbell
- Medicine, Community Health Sciences, Physiology and Pharmacology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gordon W Moe
- St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan G Howlett
- Departments of Medicine and Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Martin Boulanger
- Charles LeMoyne Hospital Research Centre, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Gregory Kline
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lawrence A Leiter
- Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlotte Jones
- University of British Columbia, Southern Medical Program, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Vincent Woo
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Janusz Kaczorowski
- Université de Montréal and Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Luc Trudeau
- Division of Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ross T Tsuyuki
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Swapnil Hiremath
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denis Drouin
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kim L Lavoie
- Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pavel Hamet
- Faculté de Médicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean C Grégoire
- Université de Montréal, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - George K Dresser
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mukul Sharma
- McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Debra Reid
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux (CISSS) de l'Outaouais, Groupes de médecine de famille (GMF) de Wakefield, Wakefield, Quebec, Canada
| | - Scott A Lear
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gregory Moullec
- Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Public Health School, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Milan Gupta
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, and Canadian Collaborative Research Network, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A Magee
- St George's, University of London and the St George's Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Janis Dionne
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anne Fournier
- Service de cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Geneviève Benoit
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janusz Feber
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luc Poirier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec et Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raj S Padwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Doreen M Rabi
- Departments of Medicine, Community Health and Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prasad GVR. Distinguishing internal property from external property in kidney transplantation. J Eval Clin Pract 2016; 22:539-43. [PMID: 27198733 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
What determines the ownership of human body parts? In this paper, I argue that this question can be informed by an exploration of the cognitive distinction between property external to the human body such as houses, cars or land, and internal property such as organs that are located within anatomical body confines. Each type of property has distinct brain representations and possibly different effects on the sense of self. This distinction may help explain the divergence in post-donation outcomes seen in different kidney donor populations. Poor outcomes in some types of kidney donors may be due not only to a failure in their proper selection by standard medical testing or post-donation care but may also be a manifestation of differing effects on sense of self resulting from transfer of their internal property. Because a kidney is internal property, a hypothesis worth exploring is that those who experience good outcomes post-donation experience dopaminergic activation and a feeling of reward, while those experiencing bad outcomes are instead overcoming cortisol or adrenergic-based stress or fear responses without a corresponding feeling of reward, disrupting of their sense of self. Discussions about the rules for internal property transfer must be based not only on values and laws designed to govern external property but also on cognitive science-based facts, values and judgments that discussions of external property do not presently accommodate. Any future system of rules for governing organ distribution requires a framework different from that of external property to prevent harm to living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Montada-Atin T, Choi D, Woo M, Retnakaran R, Huang M, Prasad GVR, Zaltzman JS. Reduction in new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplant with erythropoietin-stimulating agents: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2016; 3:23. [PMID: 27119016 PMCID: PMC4845385 DOI: 10.1186/s40697-016-0114-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) protect mice against the development of diabetes through direct effects on pancreatic ß cells. However, the effect of ESAs on the incidence of diabetes in humans has not been well studied. It is unknown whether exposure to ESAs is associated with a reduced incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between ESA exposure post-renal transplant and the development of NODAT. DESIGN We performed a single center, retrospective cohort analysis. PATIENTS We compared patients who received a first live or deceased donor renal allograft, with any exposure to an ESA vs. those without such exposure and who developed NODAT and who did not. Patients with a prior history of diabetes mellitus or multi-organ transplant, including a second renal transplant were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS NODAT was defined based on the 2008 Canadian Diabetes Association criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors independently associated with NODAT. RESULTS One hundred thirty-two (29 %) patients were exposed to an ESA, four of which developed NODAT compared to 128 who did not develop NODAT (p < 0.0001). Of those not exposed to an ESA, 15 % (48/319) developed NODAT. By Fisher's exact test, exposure to an ESA at any time post-transplant reduced the risk of developing NODAT; odds ratio (OR) = 0.08, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.018-0.352), p = 0.0008. Older age; OR = 1.41, 95 % CI (1.036-1.933), p < 0.02, higher random blood sugar at discharge; OR = 1.30, 95 % CI (1.077-1.57), p < 0.006 and deceased donor; OR 2.18 CI (1.009-4.729), p = 0.04 were associated with an increased risk of NODAT. LIMITATIONS The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, single center, and homogenous population; thus, generalizability of the results must be approached with caution. CONCLUSION ESA exposure may be associated with a reduced incidence of NODAT in the post-renal transplant population. The role of ESA in preventing NODAT requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Montada-Atin
- />Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON Canada M5C 2T2
- />Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Diana Choi
- />Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Minna Woo
- />Endocrinology and Metabolism, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5G 2C4
- />Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- />Department of Medicine and Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ravi Retnakaran
- />Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital, 60 Murray Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5T 3L9
- />Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- />Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Huang
- />Renal Transplant Research, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5B 1W8
| | - G. V. Ramesh Prasad
- />Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON Canada M5C 2T2
- />Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeffrey S. Zaltzman
- />Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, 61 Queen Street East, 9th Floor, Toronto, ON Canada M5C 2T2
- />Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- />Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Agarwal A, Prasad GVR. Post-transplant dyslipidemia: Mechanisms, diagnosis and management. World J Transplant 2016; 6:125-134. [PMID: 27011910 PMCID: PMC4801788 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-transplant dyslipidemia is highly prevalent and presents unique management challenges to the clinician. The two major outcomes to consider with post-transplant therapies for dyslipidemia are preserving or improving allograft function, and reducing cardiovascular risk. Although there are other cardiovascular risk factors such as graft dysfunction, hypertension, and diabetes, attention to dyslipidemia is warranted because interventions for dyslipidemia have an impact on reducing cardiac events in clinical trials specific to the transplant population. Dyslipidemia is not synonymous with hyperlipidemia. Numerous mechanisms exist for the occurrence of post-transplant dyslipidemia, including those mediated by immunosuppressive drug therapy. Statin therapy has received the most attention in all solid organ transplant recipient populations, although the effect of proper dietary advice and adjuvant pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents should not be dismissed. At all stages of treatment appropriate monitoring strategies for side effects should be implemented so that the benefits from these therapies can be achieved. Clinicians have a choice when there is a conflict between various transplant society and lipid society guidelines for therapy and targets.
Collapse
|
35
|
Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, McBrien K, Zarnke KB, Dasgupta K, Cloutier L, Gelfer M, Lamarre-Cliche M, Milot A, Bolli P, Tremblay G, McLean D, Tobe SW, Ruzicka M, Burns KD, Vallée M, Prasad GVR, Lebel M, Feldman RD, Selby P, Pipe A, Schiffrin EL, McFarlane PA, Oh P, Hegele RA, Khara M, Wilson TW, Penner SB, Burgess E, Herman RJ, Bacon SL, Rabkin SW, Gilbert RE, Campbell TS, Grover S, Honos G, Lindsay P, Hill MD, Coutts SB, Gubitz G, Campbell NRC, Moe GW, Howlett JG, Boulanger JM, Prebtani A, Larochelle P, Leiter LA, Jones C, Ogilvie RI, Woo V, Kaczorowski J, Trudeau L, Petrella RJ, Hiremath S, Drouin D, Lavoie KL, Hamet P, Fodor G, Grégoire JC, Lewanczuk R, Dresser GK, Sharma M, Reid D, Lear SA, Moullec G, Gupta M, Magee LA, Logan AG, Harris KC, Dionne J, Fournier A, Benoit G, Feber J, Poirier L, Padwal RS, Rabi DM. Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32:569-88. [PMID: 27118291 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 329] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension Canada's Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines Task Force provides annually updated, evidence-based recommendations to guide the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. This year, we present 4 new recommendations, as well as revisions to 2 previous recommendations. In the diagnosis and assessment of hypertension, automated office blood pressure, taken without patient-health provider interaction, is now recommended as the preferred method of measuring in-office blood pressure. Also, although a serum lipid panel remains part of the routine laboratory testing for patients with hypertension, fasting and nonfasting collections are now considered acceptable. For individuals with secondary hypertension arising from primary hyperaldosteronism, adrenal vein sampling is recommended for those who are candidates for potential adrenalectomy. With respect to the treatment of hypertension, a new recommendation that has been added is for increasing dietary potassium to reduce blood pressure in those who are not at high risk for hyperkalemia. Furthermore, in selected high-risk patients, intensive blood pressure reduction to a target systolic blood pressure ≤ 120 mm Hg should be considered to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events. Finally, in hypertensive individuals with uncomplicated, stable angina pectoris, either a β-blocker or calcium channel blocker may be considered for initial therapy. The specific evidence and rationale underlying each of these recommendations are discussed. Hypertension Canada's Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines Task Force will continue to provide annual updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Leung
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Kara Nerenberg
- Department of Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stella S Daskalopoulou
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kerry McBrien
- Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kelly B Zarnke
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kaberi Dasgupta
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lyne Cloutier
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark Gelfer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, Copeman Healthcare Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maxime Lamarre-Cliche
- Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Milot
- Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Bolli
- Ambulatory Internal Medicine Teaching Clinic, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Guy Tremblay
- CHU-Québec-Hopital St Sacrement, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Donna McLean
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Marcel Ruzicka
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin D Burns
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michel Vallée
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Marcel Lebel
- Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ross D Feldman
- Discipline of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Peter Selby
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Pipe
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ernesto L Schiffrin
- Department of Medicine and Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philip A McFarlane
- Division of Nephrology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Oh
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert A Hegele
- Departments of Medicine (Division of Endocrinology) and Biochemistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Milan Khara
- Vancouver Coastal Health Addiction Services, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas W Wilson
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - S Brian Penner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ellen Burgess
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert J Herman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Simon L Bacon
- Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, and Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon W Rabkin
- Vancouver Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Richard E Gilbert
- Division of Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tavis S Campbell
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Grover
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - George Honos
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrice Lindsay
- Best Practices and Performance, Heart and Stroke Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelagh B Coutts
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gord Gubitz
- Division of Neurology, Halifax Infirmary, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Norman R C Campbell
- Medicine, Community Health Sciences, Physiology and Pharmacology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gordon W Moe
- St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan G Howlett
- Departments of Medicine and Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Martin Boulanger
- Charles LeMoyne Hospital Research Centre, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Pierre Larochelle
- Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence A Leiter
- Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlotte Jones
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Richard I Ogilvie
- University Health Network, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vincent Woo
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Luc Trudeau
- Division of Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert J Petrella
- Department of Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Swapnil Hiremath
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denis Drouin
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kim L Lavoie
- Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pavel Hamet
- Faculté de Médicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - George Fodor
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean C Grégoire
- Université de Montréal, Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - George K Dresser
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mukul Sharma
- The Canadian Stroke Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Debra Reid
- Canadian Forces Health Services, Department of National Defence and Dietitians of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott A Lear
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Gregory Moullec
- Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Public Health School, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Milan Gupta
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A Magee
- St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kevin C Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janis Dionne
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anne Fournier
- Service de cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Geneviève Benoit
- Service de néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janusz Feber
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luc Poirier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec et Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raj S Padwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Doreen M Rabi
- Departments of Medicine, Community Health and Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Prasad GVR, Ananth S, Palepu S, Huang M, Nash MM, Zaltzman JS. Commercial kidney transplantation is an important risk factor in long-term kidney allograft survival. Kidney Int 2016; 89:1119-1124. [PMID: 27083285 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.12.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Transplant tourism, a form of transplant commercialization, has resulted in serious short-term adverse outcomes that explain reduced short-term kidney allograft survival. However, the nature of longer-term outcomes in commercial kidney transplant recipients is less clear. To study this further, we identified 69 Canadian commercial transplant recipients of 72 kidney allografts transplanted during 1998 to 2013 who reported to our transplant center for follow-up care. Their outcomes to 8 years post-transplant were compared with 702 domestic living donor and 827 deceased donor transplant recipients during this period using Kaplan-Meier survival plots and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Among many complications, notable specific events included hepatitis B or C seroconversion (7 patients), active hepatitis and/or fulminant hepatic failure (4 patients), pulmonary tuberculosis (2 patients), and a type A dissecting aortic aneurysm. Commercial transplantation was independently associated with significantly reduced death-censored kidney allograft survival (hazard ratio 3.69, 95% confidence interval 1.88-7.25) along with significantly delayed graft function and eGFR 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) or less at 3 months post-transplant. Thus, commercial transplantation represents an important risk factor for long-term kidney allograft loss. Concerted arguments and efforts using adverse recipient outcomes among the main premises are still required in order to eradicate transplant commercialization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Sailesh Ananth
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sneha Palepu
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Huang
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle M Nash
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey S Zaltzman
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Palepu S, Prasad GVR. Screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2015; 5:276-286. [PMID: 26722655 PMCID: PMC4689938 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 10/31/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pre-kidney transplant cardiac screening has garnered particular attention from guideline committees as an approach to improving post-transplant success. Screening serves two major purposes: To more accurately inform transplant candidates of their risk for a cardiac event before and after the transplant, thereby informing decisions about proceeding with transplantation, and to guide pre-transplant management so that post-transplant success can be maximized. Transplant candidates on dialysis are more likely to be screened for coronary artery disease than those not being considered for transplantation. Thorough history and physical examination taking, resting electrocardiography and echocardiography, exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, dobutamine stress echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac biomarker measurement, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging all play contributory roles towards screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation. In this review, the importance of each of these screening procedures for both coronary artery disease and other forms of cardiac disease are discussed.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Analogical reasoning is central to medical progress, and is either creative or conservative. According to Hofmann et al., conservative analogy relates concepts from old technology to new technologies with emphasis on preservation of comprehension and conduct. Creative analogy however brings new understanding to new technology, brings similarities existing in the source domain to a target domain where they previously had no bearing, and imports something entirely different from the content of the analogy itself. I defend the claim that while conservative analogies are useful by virtue of being comfortable to use from familiarity and experience, and are more easily accepted by society, they only lead to incremental advances in medicine. However, creative analogies are more exciting and productive because they generate previously unexpected associations across widely separated domains, emphasize relations over physical similarities, and structure over superficiality. I use kidney transplantation and anti-rejection medication development as an exemplar of analogical reasoning used to improve medical practice. Anti-rejection medication has not helped highly sensitized patients because of their propensity to rejecting most organs. I outline how conservative analogical reasoning led to anti-rejection medication development, but creative analogical reasoning helped highly sensitized and blood type incompatible patients through domino transplants, by which they obtain a kidney to which they are not sensitized. Creative analogical reasoning is more likely than conservative analogical reasoning to lead to revolutionary progress. While these analogies overlap and creative analogies eventually become conservative, progress is best facilitated by combining conservative and creative analogical reasoning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Palepu S, Prasad GVR. New-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: Current status and future directions. World J Diabetes 2015; 6:445-455. [PMID: 25897355 PMCID: PMC4398901 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i3.445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2014] [Revised: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
A diagnosis of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) carries with it a threat to the renal allograft, as well as the same short- and long-term implications of type 2 diabetes seen in the general population. NODAT usually occurs early after transplantation, and is usually diagnosed according to general population guidelines. Non-modifiable risk factors for NODAT include advancing age, African American, Hispanic, or South Asian ethnicity, genetic background, a positive family history for diabetes mellitus, polycystic kidney disease, and previously diagnosed glucose intolerance. Modifiable risk factors for NODAT include obesity and the metabolic syndrome, hepatitis C virus and cytomegalovirus infection, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitor drugs (especially tacrolimus), and sirolimus. NODAT affects graft and patient survival, and increases the incidence of post-transplant cardiovascular disease. The incidence and impact of NODAT can be minimized through pre- and post-transplant screening to identify patients at higher risk, including by oral glucose tolerance tests, as well as multi-disciplinary care, lifestyle modification, and the use of modified immunosuppressive regimens coupled with glucose-lowering therapies including oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin. Since NODAT is a major cause of post-transplant morbidity and mortality, measures to reduce its incidence and impact have the potential to greatly improve overall transplant success.
Collapse
|
40
|
Prasad GVR. Metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease: Current status and future directions. World J Nephrol 2014; 3:210-219. [PMID: 25374814 PMCID: PMC4220353 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Revised: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 09/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a term used to denote a combination of selected, widely prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related risk factors. Despite the ambiguous definition of MetS, it has been clearly associated with chronic kidney disease markers including reduced glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and/or microalbuminuria, and histopathological markers such as tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. However, the etiological role of MetS in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less clear. The relationship between MetS and CKD is complex and bidirectional, and so is best understood when CKD is viewed as a common progressive illness along the course of which MetS, another common disease, may intervene and contribute. Possible mechanisms of renal injury include insulin resistance and oxidative stress, increased proinflammatory cytokine production, increased connective tissue growth and profibrotic factor production, increased microvascular injury, and renal ischemia. MetS also portends a higher CVD risk at all stages of CKD from early renal insufficiency to end-stage renal disease. Clinical interventions for MetS in the presence of CKD should include a combination of weight reduction, appropriate dietary modification and increase physical activity, plus targeting of individual CVD-related risk factors such as dysglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia while conforming to relevant national societal guidelines.
Collapse
|
41
|
Prasad GVR, Huang M, Silver SA, Al-Lawati AI, Rapi L, Nash MM, Zaltzman JS. Metabolic syndrome definitions and components in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 2014; 28:79-88. [PMID: 25207680 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2014] [Revised: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) associates with cardiovascular risk post-kidney transplantation, but its ambiguity impairs understanding of its diagnostic utility relative to components. We compared five MetS definitions and the predictive value of constituent components of significant definitions for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a cohort of 1182 kidney transplant recipients. MetS definitions were adjusted for noncomponent traditional Framingham risk factors and relevant transplant-related variables. Kaplan-Meier, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards analysis were utilized. There were 143 MACE over 7447 patient-years of follow-up. Only the World Health Organization (WHO) 1998 definition predicted MACE (25.3 vs 15.5 events/1000 patient-years, P = 0.019). Time-to-MACE was 5.5 ± 3.5 years with MetS and 6.8 ± 3.9 years without MetS (P < 0.0001). MetS was independent of pertinent MACE risk factors except age and previous cardiac disease. Among MetS components, dysglycemia provided greatest hazard ratio (HR) for MACE (1.814 [95% confidence interval 1.26-2.60]), increased successively by microalbuminuria (HR 1.946 [1.37-2.75]), dyslipidemia (3.284 [1.72-6.26]), hypertension (4.127 [2.16-7.86]), and central obesity (4.282 [2.09-8.76]). MetS did not affect graft survival. In summary, although the WHO 1998 definition provides greatest predictive value for post-transplant MACE, most of this is conferred by dysglycemia and is overshadowed by age and previous cardiac disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Renal Transplant Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ruzicka M, Quinn RR, McFarlane P, Hemmelgarn B, Ramesh Prasad GV, Feber J, Nesrallah G, MacKinnon M, Tangri N, McCormick B, Tobe S, Blydt-Hansen TD, Hiremath S. Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 63:869-87. [PMID: 24725980 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 03/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) 2012 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) provides the structural and evidence base for the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) commentary on this guideline's relevancy and application to the Canadian health care system. While in general agreement, we provide commentary on 13 of the 21 KDIGO guideline statements. Specifically, we agreed that nonpharmacological interventions should play a significant role in the management of hypertension in patients with CKD. We also agreed that the approach to the management of hypertension in elderly patients with CKD should be individualized and take into account comorbid conditions to avoid adverse outcomes from excessive BP lowering. In contrast to KDIGO, the CSN Work Group believes there is insufficient evidence to target a lower BP for nondiabetic CKD patients based on the presence and severity of albuminuria. The CSN Work Group concurs with the Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) recommendation of a target BP for all non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients without diabetes of ≤140 mm Hg systolic and ≤90 mm Hg diastolic. Similarly, it is our position that in diabetic patients with CKD and normal urinary albumin excretion, raising the threshold for treatment from <130 mm Hg systolic BP to <140 mm Hg systolic BP could increase stroke risk and the risk of worsening kidney disease. The CSN Work Group concurs with the CHEP and the Canadian Diabetic Association recommendation for diabetic patients with CKD with or without albuminuria to continue to be treated to a BP target similar to that of the overall diabetes population, aiming for BP levels < 130/80 mm Hg. Consistent with this, the CSN Work Group endorses a BP target of <130/80 mm Hg for diabetic patients with a kidney transplant. Finally, in the absence of evidence for a lower BP target, the CSN Work Group concurs with the CHEP recommendation to target BP<140/90 mm Hg for nondiabetic patients with a kidney transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Ruzicka
- Division of Nephrology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
| | - Robert R Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Phil McFarlane
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Brenda Hemmelgarn
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - G V Ramesh Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Janusz Feber
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa
| | - Gihad Nesrallah
- The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Keenan Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Division of Nephrology, Humber River Regional Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Martin MacKinnon
- Division of Nephrology, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, New Brunswick
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Division of Nephrology, Seven Oaks General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
| | | | - Sheldon Tobe
- Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Tom D Blydt-Hansen
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Klarenbach S, Gill JS, Knoll G, Caulfield T, Boudville N, Prasad GVR, Karpinski M, Storsley L, Treleaven D, Arnold J, Cuerden M, Jacobs P, Garg AX. Economic consequences incurred by living kidney donors: a Canadian multi-center prospective study. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:916-22. [PMID: 24597854 PMCID: PMC4285205 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2013] [Revised: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 12/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Some living kidney donors incur economic consequences as a result of donation; however, these costs are poorly quantified. We developed a framework to comprehensively assess economic consequences from the donor perspective including out-of-pocket cost, lost wages and home productivity loss. We prospectively enrolled 100 living kidney donors from seven Canadian centers between 2004 and 2008 and collected and valued economic consequences ($CAD 2008) at 3 months and 1 year after donation. Almost all (96%) donors experienced economic consequences, with 94% reporting travel costs and 47% reporting lost pay. The average and median costs of lost pay were $2144 (SD 4167) and $0 (25th-75th percentile 0, 2794), respectively. For other expenses (travel, accommodation, medication and medical), mean and median costs were $1780 (SD 2504) and $821 (25th-75th percentile 242, 2271), respectively. From the donor perspective, mean cost was $3268 (SD 4704); one-third of donors incurred cost >$3000, and 15% >$8000. The majority of donors (83%) reported inability to perform usual household activities for an average duration of 33 days; 8% reported out-of-pocket costs for assistance with these activities. The economic impact of living kidney donation for some individuals is large. We advocate for programs to reimburse living donors for their legitimate costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Klarenbach
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Health EconomicsEdmonton, AB, Canada,
*Corresponding author: Scott Klarenbach,
| | - J S Gill
- Department of Medicine, University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC, Canada
| | - G Knoll
- Department of Medicine, University of OttawaOttawa, ON, Canada
| | - T Caulfield
- Faculty of Law, School of Population and Public Health, University of AlbertaEdmonton, AB, Canada
| | - N Boudville
- School of Medicine, University of Western AustraliaCrawley, WA, Canada
| | - G V R Prasad
- Department of Medicine, University of TorontoToronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Karpinski
- Department of Medicine, University of ManitobaWinnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - L Storsley
- Department of Medicine, University of ManitobaWinnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - D Treleaven
- Department of Medicine, McMaster UniversityHamilton, ON, Canada
| | - J Arnold
- University of Western OntarioLondon, ON, Canada
| | - M Cuerden
- University of Western OntarioLondon, ON, Canada
| | - P Jacobs
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Health EconomicsEdmonton, AB, Canada
| | - A X Garg
- Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western OntarioLondon, ON, Canada,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster UniversityHamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Thomas SM, Lam NN, Welk BK, Nguan C, Huang A, Nash DM, Prasad GVR, Knoll GA, Koval JJ, Lentine KL, Kim SJ, Lok CE, Garg AX. Risk of kidney stones with surgical intervention in living kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2013; 13:2935-44. [PMID: 24102981 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Revised: 07/12/2013] [Accepted: 07/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
A kidney stone in a person with a solitary kidney requires urgent attention, which may result in surgical and/or hospital attention. We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to determine if living kidney donors compared to healthy nondonors have a higher risk of: (i) kidney stones with surgical intervention, and (ii) hospital encounters for kidney stones. We reviewed all predonation charts for living kidney donations from 1992 to 2009 at five major transplant centers in Ontario, Canada, and linked this information to healthcare databases. We selected nondonors from the healthiest segment of the general population and matched 10 nondonors to every donor. Of the 2019 donors and 20 190 nondonors, none had evidence of kidney stones prior to cohort entry. Median follow-up time was 8.4 years (maximum 19.7 years; loss to follow-up <7%). There was no difference in the rate of kidney stones with surgical intervention in donors compared to nondonors (8.3 vs. 9.7 events/10 000 person-years; rate ratio 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.53). Similarly there was no difference in the rate of hospital encounters for kidney stones (12.1 vs. 16.1 events/10 000 person-years; rate ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.45-1.24). These interim results are reassuring for the safety of living kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Thomas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Young A, Kim SJ, Garg AX, Huang A, Knoll G, Prasad GR, Treleaven D, Lok CE, Arnold J, Boudville N, Bugeya A, Dipchand C, Doshi M, Feldman L, Garg A, Geddes C, Gibney E, Gill J, Karpinski M, Kim J, Klarenbach S, Knoll G, Lok C, McFarlane P, Monroy-Cuadros M, Muirhead N, Nevis I, Nguan CY, Parikh C, Poggio E, Prasad GVR, Storsley L, Taub K, Thomas S, Treleaven D, Young A. Living kidney donor estimated glomerular filtration rate and recipient graft survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 29:188-95. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
46
|
Hackam DG, Quinn RR, Ravani P, Rabi DM, Dasgupta K, Daskalopoulou SS, Khan NA, Herman RJ, Bacon SL, Cloutier L, Dawes M, Rabkin SW, Gilbert RE, Ruzicka M, McKay DW, Campbell TS, Grover S, Honos G, Schiffrin EL, Bolli P, Wilson TW, Feldman RD, Lindsay P, Hill MD, Gelfer M, Burns KD, Vallée M, Prasad GVR, Lebel M, McLean D, Arnold JMO, Moe GW, Howlett JG, Boulanger JM, Larochelle P, Leiter LA, Jones C, Ogilvie RI, Woo V, Kaczorowski J, Trudeau L, Petrella RJ, Milot A, Stone JA, Drouin D, Lavoie KL, Lamarre-Cliche M, Godwin M, Tremblay G, Hamet P, Fodor G, Carruthers SG, Pylypchuk GB, Burgess E, Lewanczuk R, Dresser GK, Penner SB, Hegele RA, McFarlane PA, Sharma M, Reid DJ, Tobe SW, Poirier L, Padwal RS. The 2013 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29:528-42. [PMID: 23541660 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2013] [Revised: 01/14/2013] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We updated the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults for 2013. This year's update includes 2 new recommendations. First, among nonhypertensive or stage 1 hypertensive individuals, the use of resistance or weight training exercise does not adversely influence blood pressure (BP) (Grade D). Thus, such patients need not avoid this type of exercise for fear of increasing BP. Second, and separately, for very elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (age 80 years or older), the target for systolic BP should be < 150 mm Hg (Grade C) rather than < 140 mm Hg as recommended for younger patients. We also discuss 2 additional topics at length (the pharmacological treatment of mild hypertension and the possibility of a diastolic J curve in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease). In light of several methodological limitations, a recent systematic review of 4 trials in patients with stage 1 uncomplicated hypertension did not lead to changes in management recommendations. In addition, because of a lack of prospective randomized data assessing diastolic BP thresholds in patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension, no recommendation to set a selective diastolic cut point for such patients could be affirmed. However, both of these issues will be examined on an ongoing basis, in particular as new evidence emerges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Hackam
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cole EH, Prasad GVR, Cardella CJ, Kim JS, Tinckam KJ, Cattran DC, Schiff JR, Landsberg DN, Zaltzman JS, Gill JS. A pilot study of reduced dose cyclosporine and corticosteroids to reduce new onset diabetes mellitus and acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Res 2013; 2:1. [PMID: 23369458 PMCID: PMC3599918 DOI: 10.1186/2047-1440-2-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2012] [Accepted: 12/15/2012] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background New onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) and acute rejection (AR) are important causes of morbidity and risk factors for allograft failure after kidney transplantation. Methods In this multi-center, open label, single-arm pilot study, 49 adult (≥18 years of age), low immunologic risk, non-diabetic recipients of a first deceased or living donor kidney transplant received early steroid reduction to 5 mg/day combined with Thymoglobulin® (Genzyme Transplant, Cambridge, MA, USA) induction, low dose cyclosporine (2-hour post-dose (C2) target of 600 to 800 ng/ml) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) therapy. Results Six months after transplantation, two patients (4%) developed NODM and one patient (2%) developed AR. Four patients had impaired fasting glucose tolerance based on 75-g oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT). There was one patient death. There were no episodes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or BK virus nephritis. In contrast, in a historical cohort of n = 27 patients treated with Thymoglobulin induction, and conventional doses of cyclosporine and corticosteroids, the incidence of NODM and AR was 18% and 15%. Conclusions The pilot study results suggest that Thymoglobulin induction combined with early steroid reduction, reduced cyclosporine exposure and MPA, may reduce the incidence of both NODM and AR in low immunological risk patients. A future controlled study enriched for patients at high risk for NODM is under consideration. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: http://NCT00706680
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H Cole
- Toronto General Hospital, 190 Elizabeth Street, M5G 2C4, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Connelly PW, Ramesh Prasad GV. Adiponectin in renal disease--a review of the evidence as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2012; 49:218-31. [PMID: 23216078 DOI: 10.3109/10408363.2012.736470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Adiponectin, an adipokine, was discovered in 1995. The initial evidence led to the study of adiponectin as a determinant of insulin sensitivity and blood glucose levels. The literature then evolved to reports of the inverse association of adiponectin with incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. Shortly thereafter, reports of a positive association with heart failure and mortality appeared and were replicated. We review here the basic science evidence and clinical studies of the role of renal function and kidney disease as a determinant of adiponectin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip W Connelly
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ramesh Prasad GV. ACP Journal Club. Review: lipid-lowering drugs decrease all-cause and cardiac mortality and CV events in CKD. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157:JC5-5. [PMID: 23165681 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-02005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
50
|
Ramesh Prasad GV. ACP Journal Club. Review: statins decrease mortality and major CV events in adults with CKD not receiving dialysis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157:JC5-4. [PMID: 23165680 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-02004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|