1
|
Berchet C, Dedet G, Klazinga N, Colombo F. Inequalities in cancer prevention and care across Europe. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:10-11. [PMID: 36603916 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00746-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Berchet
- Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris 75016, France.
| | - Guillaume Dedet
- Department of Health Policy and Practice, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Niek Klazinga
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Francesca Colombo
- Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris 75016, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Ferrario
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Guillaume Dedet
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France
| | - Tifenn Humbert
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG/Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria
| | - Fatima Suleman
- Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Hanne Bak Pedersen
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vogler S, Dedet G, Pedersen HB. Financial Burden of Prescribed Medicines Included in Outpatient Benefits Package Schemes: Comparative Analysis of Co-Payments for Reimbursable Medicines in European Countries. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019; 17:803-816. [PMID: 31506879 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00509-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to analyse the financial burden that co-payments for prescribed and reimbursed medicines pose on patients in European countries. METHODS Five medicines used in acute conditions (antibiotic, analgesic) and in chronic care (hypertension, asthma, diabetes) were selected. Co-payments (standard and five defined population groups, e.g. low-income people, patients with high consumption) were surveyed based on information retrieved from national price lists (September 2017) and co-payment regulation in nine countries (Albania, Austria, England, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Kyrgyzstan and Sweden). The financial burden of the selected medicines (originator and lowest-priced generic) was described as the percentage of patients' payments for 1 month's therapy or treatment of one episode in comparison to the national minimum monthly wage. RESULTS The study showed large variation in co-payments between the countries. Financial burden resulting from co-payments for reimbursed medicines tended to be higher in lower-income countries (Kyrgyzstan: 9% of minimum monthly wage for generic amlodipine; 2-4% for generic and originator salbutamol; Albania: approximately 3% for originator amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and metformin). Most studied countries applied reduction or exemption mechanisms (children were exempt in five countries, no or lower co-payments for low-income people in five countries, exemptions from co-payments upon reaching a threshold of expenses in six countries). CONCLUSIONS Co-payments for prescribed medicines can pose a substantial financial burden for outpatients, particularly in lower-income countries. The price of a medicine, availability of lower-priced medicines and the design of co-payments, including exemptions and reductions for specific groups, can considerably impact patients' expenses for medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Stubenring 6, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Guillaume Dedet
- Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 75116, Paris, France
- World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanne Bak Pedersen
- World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dedet G. Maghreb health systems and European health systems: so different? Eur J Public Health 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
5
|
Vogler S, Schneider P, Dedet G, Bak Pedersen H. Affordable and equitable access to subsidised outpatient medicines? Analysis of co-payments under the Additional Drug Package in Kyrgyzstan. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18:89. [PMID: 31196109 PMCID: PMC6567501 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0990-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Out-of-pocket (OOP) payments can constitute a major barrier for affordable and equitable access to essential medicines. Household surveys in Kyrgyzstan pointed to a perceived growth in OOP payments for outpatient medicines, including those covered by the benefits package scheme (the Additional Drug Package, ADP). The study aimed to explore the extent of co-payments for ADP-listed medicines and to explain the reasons for developments. METHODS A descriptive statistical analysis was performed on prices and volumes of prescribed ADP-listed medicines dispensed in pharmacies during 2013-2015 (1,041,777 prescriptions claimed, data provided by the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund). Additionally, data on the value and volume of imported medicines in 2013-2015 (obtained from the National Medicines Regulatory Agency) were analysed. RESULTS In 2013-2015, co-payments for medicines dispensed under the ADP grew, on average, by 22.8%. Co-payments for ADP-listed medicines amounted to around 50% of a reimbursed baseline price, but as pharmacy retail prices were not regulated, co-payments tended to be higher in practice. The increase in co-payments coincided with a reduction in the number of prescriptions dispensed (by 14%) and an increase in average amounts reimbursed per prescription in nearly all therapeutic groups (by 22%) in the study period. While the decrease in prescriptions suggests possible underuse, as patients might forego filling prescriptions due to financial restraints, the growth in average amounts reimbursed could be an indication of inefficiencies in public funding. Variation between the regions suggests regional inequity. Devaluation of the national currency was observed, and the value of imported medicines increased by nearly 20%, whereas volumes of imports remained at around the same level in 2013-2015. Thus, patients and public procurers had to pay more for the same amount of medicines. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest an increase in pharmacy retail prices as the major driver for higher co-payments. The national currency devaluation contributed to the price increases, and the absence of medicine price regulation aggravated the effects of the depreciation. It is recommended that Kyrgyzstan should introduce medicine price regulation and exemptions for low-income people from co-payments to ensure a more affordable and equitable access to medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG / Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Schneider
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG / Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria
| | - Guillaume Dedet
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France
| | - Hanne Bak Pedersen
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vogler S, Paris V, Ferrario A, Wirtz VJ, de Joncheere K, Schneider P, Pedersen HB, Dedet G, Babar ZUD. How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2017; 15:307-321. [PMID: 28063134 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
This article discusses pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in European countries with regard to their ability to ensure affordable access to medicines. A frequently applied pricing policy is external price referencing. While it provides some benchmark for policy-makers and has been shown to be able to generate savings, it may also contribute to delay in product launch in countries where medicine prices are low. Value-based pricing has been proposed as a policy that promotes access while rewarding useful innovation; however, implementing it has proven quite challenging. For high-priced medicines, managed-entry agreements are increasingly used. These agreements allow policy-makers to manage uncertainty and obtain lower prices. They can also facilitate earlier market access in case of limited evidence about added therapeutic value of the medicine. However, these agreements raise transparency concerns due to the confidentiality clause. Tendering as used in the hospital and offpatent outpatient sectors has been proven to reduce medicine prices but it requires a robust framework and appropriate design with clear strategic goals in order to prevent shortages. These pricing and reimbursement policies are supplemented by the widespread use of Health Technology Assessment to inform decision-making, and by strategies to improve the uptake of generics, and also biosimilars. While European countries have been implementing a set of policy options, there is a lack of thorough impact assessments of several pricing and reimbursement policies on affordable access. Increased cooperation between authorities, experience sharing and improving transparency on price information, including the disclosure of confidential discounts, are opportunities to address current challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), 1010, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Valérie Paris
- Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 75116, Paris, France
| | - Alessandra Ferrario
- LSE Health and Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Veronika J Wirtz
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Kees de Joncheere
- Essential Medicines and Health Products Department (EMP), World Health Organization (WHO), 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| | - Peter Schneider
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), 1010, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hanne Bak Pedersen
- World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
| | - Guillaume Dedet
- World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
| | - Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Mail Bag, 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Panteli D, Arickx F, Cleemput I, Dedet G, Eckhardt H, Fogarty E, Gerkens S, Henschke C, Hislop J, Jommi C, Kaitelidou D, Kawalec P, Keskimaki I, Kroneman M, Lopez Bastida J, Pita Barros P, Ramsberg J, Schneider P, Spillane S, Vogler S, Vuorenkoski L, Wallach Kildemoes H, Wouters O, Busse R. Pharmaceutical regulation in 15 European countries review. Health Syst Transit 2016; 18:1-122. [PMID: 27929376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In the context of pharmaceutical care, policy-makers repeatedly face the challenge of balancing patient access to effective medicines with affordability and rising costs. With the aim of guiding the health policy discourse towards questions that are important to actual and potential patients, this study investigates a broad range of regulatory measures, spanning marketing authorization to generic substitution and resulting price levels in a sample of 16 European health systems (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Scotland, Spain and Sweden). All countries employ a mix of regulatory mechanisms to contain pharmaceutical expenditure and ensure quality and efficiency in pharmaceutical care, albeit with varying configurations and rigour. This variation also influences the extent of publicly financed pharmaceutical costs. Overall, observed differences in pharmaceutical expenditure should be interpreted in conjunction with the differing volume and composition of consumption and price levels, as well as dispensation practices and their impact on measurement of pharmaceutical costs. No definitive evidence has yet been produced on the effects of different cost-containment measures on patient outcomes. Depending on the foremost policy concerns in each country, different levers will have to be used to enable the delivery of appropriate care at affordable prices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Reinhard Busse
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies and Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Bruijn W, Ibáñez C, Frisk P, Bak Pedersen H, Alkan A, Vella Bonanno P, Brkičić LS, Bucsics A, Dedet G, Eriksen J, Fadare JO, Fürst J, Gallego G, Godói IP, Guerra Júnior AA, Gürsöz H, Jan S, Jones J, Joppi R, Kerman S, Laius O, Madzikwa N, Magnússon E, Maticic M, Markovic-Pekovic V, Massele A, Ogunleye O, O'Leary A, Piessnegger J, Sermet C, Simoens S, Tiroyakgosi C, Truter I, Thyberg M, Tomekova K, Wladysiuk M, Vandoros S, Vural EH, Zara C, Godman B. Introduction and Utilization of High Priced HCV Medicines across Europe; Implications for the Future. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7:197. [PMID: 27516740 PMCID: PMC4964878 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is a widespread transmittable disease with a diagnosed prevalence of 2.0%. Fortunately, it is now curable in most patients. Sales of medicines to treat HCV infection grew 2.7% per year between 2004 and 2011, enhanced by the launch of the protease inhibitors (PIs) boceprevir (BCV) and telaprevir (TVR) in addition to ribavirin and pegylated interferon (pegIFN). Costs will continue to rise with new treatments including sofosbuvir, which now include interferon free regimens. OBJECTIVE Assess the uptake of BCV and TVR across Europe from a health authority perspective to offer future guidance on dealing with new high cost medicines. METHODS Cross-sectional descriptive study of medicines to treat HCV (pegIFN, ribavirin, BCV and TVR) among European countries from 2008 to 2013. Utilization measured in defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 patients/quarter (DIQs) and expenditure in Euros/DDD. Health authority activities to influence treatments categorized using the 4E methodology (Education, Engineering, Economics and Enforcement). RESULTS Similar uptake of BCV and TVR among European countries and regions, ranging from 0.5 DIQ in Denmark, Netherlands and Slovenia to 1.5 DIQ in Tayside and Catalonia in 2013. However, different utilization of the new PIs vs. ribavirin indicates differences in dual vs. triple therapy, which is down to factors including physician preference and genotypes. Reimbursed prices for BCV and TVR were comparable across countries. CONCLUSION There was reasonable consistency in the utilization of BCV and TVR among European countries in comparison with other high priced medicines. This may reflect the social demand to limit the transmission of HCV. However, the situation is changing with new curative medicines for HCV genotype 1 (GT1) with potentially an appreciable budget impact. These concerns have resulted in different prices across countries, with their impact on budgets and patient outcomes monitored in the future to provide additional guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie de Bruijn
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht UniversityUtrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cristina Ibáñez
- Catalan Health Service - Servei Català de la SalutBarcelona, Spain
| | - Pia Frisk
- Public Health Services Committee, Stockholm County CouncilStockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanne Bak Pedersen
- Health Technologies and Pharmaceuticals, Division of Health Systems and Public Health, WHO Regional Office for EuropeCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ali Alkan
- Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Ministry of HealthAnkara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Anna Bucsics
- Department of Finance, University of ViennaVienna, Austria
| | | | - Jaran Eriksen
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital HuddingeStockholm, Sweden
| | - Joseph O. Fadare
- Department of Pharmacology, Ekiti State UniversityAdo-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance InstituteLjubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gisselle Gallego
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame AustraliaDarlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umea UniversityUmea, Sweden
| | - Isabella P. Godói
- School of Pharmacy, Graduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Assistance, Federal University of Minas GeraisBelo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Social Pharmacy, SUS Collaborating Centre – Health Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas GeraisBelo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Augusto A. Guerra Júnior
- School of Pharmacy, Graduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Assistance, Federal University of Minas GeraisBelo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Social Pharmacy, SUS Collaborating Centre – Health Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas GeraisBelo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Hakkı Gürsöz
- Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Ministry of HealthAnkara, Turkey
| | - Saira Jan
- Clinical Pharmacy, Rutgers State University of New JerseyPiscataway, NJ, USA
- Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New JerseyNewark, NJ, USA
| | - Jan Jones
- Scottish Medicines ConsortiumGlasgow, UK
| | - Roberta Joppi
- Pharmaceutical Drug Department, Azienda Sanitaria Locale of VeronaVerona, Italy
| | - Saim Kerman
- Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Ministry of HealthAnkara, Turkey
| | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of MedicinesTartu, Estonia
| | | | - Einar Magnússon
- Department of Health Services, Ministry of HealthReykjavík, Iceland
| | - Mojca Maticic
- Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses, University Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vanda Markovic-Pekovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja LukaBanja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Ministry of Health and Social WelfareBanja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Amos Massele
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of BotswanaGaborone, Botswana
| | - Olayinka Ogunleye
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching HospitalLagos, Nigeria
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Lagos State University College of MedicineLagos, Nigeria
| | | | - Jutta Piessnegger
- Hauptverband der Österreichischen SozialversicherungsträgerWien, Austria
| | | | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU LeuvenLeuven, Belgium
| | | | - Ilse Truter
- Drug Utilisation Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityPort Elizabeth, South Africa
| | - Magnus Thyberg
- Stockholms Läns Landsting, Hälso-och SjukvårdsförvaltningenStockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Sotiris Vandoros
- School of Management and Business, King's College LondonLondon, UK
| | - Elif H. Vural
- Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Ministry of HealthAnkara, Turkey
| | - Corinne Zara
- Catalan Health Service - Servei Català de la SalutBarcelona, Spain
| | - Brian Godman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital HuddingeStockholm, Sweden
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of StrathclydeGlasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Ferrario A, Wirtz VJ, de Joncheere K, Pedersen HB, Dedet G, Paris V, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Babar ZUD. Pharmaceutical policies in a crisis? Challenges and solutions identified at the PPRI Conference. J Pharm Policy Pract 2016; 9:9. [PMID: 26981252 PMCID: PMC4792087 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-016-0056-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In October 2015, the third international Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information (PPRI) Conference was held in Vienna to foster discussion on challenges in pricing and reimbursement policies for medicines. The research presented highlighted that commonly used pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies are not sufficiently effective to address current challenges. Conference participants called for fundamental reforms to ensure access to medicines, particularly to new and potentially more effective and/or safe medicines, while safeguarding the financial sustainability of health systems and working towards universal health coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Health Economics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, 1010 Austria
| | - Nina Zimmermann
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Health Economics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, 1010 Austria
| | - Alessandra Ferrario
- LSE Health and Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE UK
| | - Veronika J Wirtz
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118 USA
| | - Kees de Joncheere
- Essential Medicines and Health Products Department (EMP), World Health Organization (WHO), 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
| | - Hanne Bak Pedersen
- World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2100 Denmark
| | - Guillaume Dedet
- World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2100 Denmark
| | - Valérie Paris
- Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, 75116 France
| | - Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3508 TB The Netherlands
| | - Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Mail Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Landais P, Boudemaghe T, Suehs C, Dedet G, Lebihan-Benjamin C. Computerized Medico-Economic Decision Making: An International Comparison. Medical Informatics, e-Health 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-2-8178-0478-1_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
|
11
|
Malouf GG, Camparo P, Molinié V, Dedet G, Oudard S, Schleiermacher G, Theodore C, Dutcher J, Billemont B, Bompas E, Guillot A, Boccon-Gibod L, Couturier J, Escudier B. Transcription factor E3 and transcription factor EB renal cell carcinomas: clinical features, biological behavior and prognostic factors. J Urol 2010; 185:24-9. [PMID: 21074195 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Translocation renal cell carcinomas represent a distinct clinicopathological entity. Studying the natural history, biological behavior and potential prognostic factors are crucially warranted. MATERIALS AND METHODS We selected 54 patients with renal cell carcinoma with positive nuclear transcription factor E3 and transcription factor EB expression from the Juvenile RCC Network. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS Median patient age was 24 years (range 1 to 64) and the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.4. At diagnosis 35 patients (65%) had local disease while 19 (35%) presented with distant metastases. The latter patients were older (median age 36 years) and predominantly male (male-to-female ratio 2) whereas the former group had a median age of 16 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.5. Overall 36 patients underwent complete tumor resection and of these 8 had recurring cancer. On univariate analysis only lymph node involvement and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage were associated with poor recurrence-free survival. When stratified according to lymph node status age 25 years or older was found to predict relapse (p = 0.03). With a median followup of 19.2 months (range 1 to 58) 3-year overall survival was 14.3% in patients with distant metastasis and 70.6% in those without distant metastasis. Distant metastasis developed in the 2 patients with ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion vs 1 of 11 with other fusion genes. CONCLUSIONS Transcription factor E3 and transcription factor EB renal cell carcinoma display different clinical behavior according to gender and age. Lymph node involvement represents the only factor that predicts recurrence. ASPSCR1-TFE3 might be the most aggressive among the transcription factor E3 fusion genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel G Malouf
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|