Reduced functional capacity is associated with the proportion of impaired myocardial deformation assessed in heart failure patients by CMR

Aims

Heart failure (HF) does not only reduce the life expectancy in patients, but their life is also often limited by HF symptoms leading to a reduced quality of life (QoL) and a diminished exercise capacity. Novel parameters in cardiac imaging, including both global and regional myocardial strain imaging, promise to contribute to better patient characterization and ultimately to better patient management. However, many of these methods are not part of clinical routine yet, their associations with clinical parameters have been poorly studied. An imaging parameters that also indicate the clinical symptom burden of HF patients would make cardiac imaging more robust toward incomplete clinical information and support the clinical decision process.

Methods and results

This prospective study conducted at two centers in Germany between 2017 and 2018 enrolled stable outpatient subjects with HF [n = 56, including HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] and a control cohort (n = 19). Parameters assessed included measures for external myocardial function, for example, cardiac index and myocardial deformation measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), the global circumferential strain (GCS), and the regional distribution of segment deformation within the LV myocardium, as well as basic phenotypical characteristics including the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). If less than 80% of the LV segments are preserved in their deformation capacity the functional capacity by 6MWT (6 minutes walking distance: MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 579.8 ± 177.6 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 401.3 ± 121.7 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 456.4 ± 68.9 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 397.6 ± 125.9 m, overall p-value: 0.03) as well as the symptom burden are significantly impaired (NYHA class: MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 0.6 ± 1.1 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 1.7 ± 1.2 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 1.8 ± 0.7 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 2.4 ± 0.5 m; overall p-value < 0.01). Differences were also observed in the perceived exertion assessed by on the Borg scale (MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 8.2 ± 2.3 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 10.4 ± 3.2 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 9.8 ± 2.1 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 11.0 ± 2.9 m; overall p-value: 0.20) as well as quality of life measures (MLHFQ; MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 7.5 ± 12.4 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 23.4 ± 23.4 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 20.5 ± 21.2 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 27.4 ± 24.4 m; overall p-value: 0.15)-while these differences were not significant.

Conclusion

The share of LV segments with preserved myocardial contraction promises to discriminate between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects based on the imaging findings, even when the LV ejection fraction is preserved. This finding is promising to make imaging studies more robust toward incomplete clinical information.

Myocardial deformation assessed among heart failure entities by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

AIMS

Although heart failure (HF) is a leading cause for hospitalization and mortality, normalized and comparable non-invasive assessment of haemodynamics and myocardial action remains limited. Moreover, myocardial deformation has not been compared between the guideline-defined HF entities. The distribution of affected and impaired segments within the contracting left ventricular (LV) myocardium have also not been compared. Therefore, we assessed myocardial function impairment by strain in patients with HF and control subjects by magnetic resonance imaging after clinically phenotyping these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective study conducted at two centres in Germany between 2017 and 2018 enrolled stable outpatient subjects with HF [n = 56, including HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] and a control cohort (n = 12). Parameters assessed included measures for external myocardial function, for example, cardiac index and myocardial deformation measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), the global circumferential strain (GCS) and the regional distribution of segment deformation within the LV myocardium, as well as basic phenotypical characteristics. Comparison of the cardiac indices at rest showed no differences neither between the HF groups nor between the control group and HF patients (one-way ANOVA P = 0.70). The analysis of the strain data revealed differences between all groups in both LV GLS (One-way ANOVA: P < 0.01. Controls vs. HFpEF: -20.48 ± 1.62 vs. -19.27 ± 1.25. HFpEF vs. HFmrEF: -19.27 ± 1.25 vs. -15.72 ± 2.76. HFmrEF vs. HFrEF: -15.72 ± 2.76 vs. -11.51 ± 3.97.) and LV GCS (One-way ANOVA: P < 0.01. Controls vs. HFpEF: -19.74 ± 2.18 vs. -17.47 ± 2.10. HFpEF vs. HFmrEF: -17.47 ± 2.10 vs. -12.78 ± 3.47. HFrEF: -11.41 ± 3.27). Comparing the segment deformation distribution patterns highlighted the discriminating effect between the groups was much more prominent between the groups (one-way ANOVA P < 0.01) when compared by a score combining regional effects and a global view on the LV. Further analyses of the patterns among the segments affected showed that while the LVEF is preserved in HFpEF, the segments impaired in their contractility are located in the ventricular septum. The worse the LVEF is, the more segments are affected, but the septum remains an outstanding location with the most severe contractility impairment throughout the HF entities.

CONCLUSIONS

While cardiac index at rest did not differ significantly between controls and stable HF patients suffering from HFrEF, HFmrEF, or HFpEF, the groups did differ significantly in LV GLS and LV GCS values. Regional strain analysis revealed that the LV septum is the location affected most, with reduced values already visible in HFpEF and further reductions in HFmrEF and HFrEF.

Effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on adverse cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction-Results of the Chymase Inhibitor in Adverse Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction (CHIARA MIA) 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Adverse cardiac remodeling is a major risk factor for the development of post myocardial infarction (MI) heart failure (HF). This study investigates the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on adverse cardiac remodeling after acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial patients with first STEMI were eligible. To preferentially enrich patients at high risk of adverse remodeling, main inclusion criteria were a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% and an infarct size >10% on day 5 to 9 post MI as measured by cardiac MRI. Patients were then randomized to 6 months treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n = 54) or placebo (n = 53) twice daily on top of standard of care starting day 6 to 12 post MI. The changes in LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) from baseline to 6 months were analyzed by a central blinded cardiac MRI core laboratory.

RESULTS

Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated and achieved mean total trough concentrations that were approximately tenfold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. Comparable changes in LVEF (fulacimstat: 3.5% ± 5.4%, placebo: 4.0% ± 5.0%, P = .69), LVEDVI (fulacimstat: 7.3 ± 13.3 mL/m², placebo: 5.1 ± 18.9 mL/m², P = .54), and LVESVI (fulacimstat: 2.3 ± 11.2 mL/m², placebo: 0.6 ± 14.8 mL/m², P = .56) were observed in both treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after first STEMI but had no effect on cardiac remodeling.

87Effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on adverse cardiac remodelling after acute myocardial infarction - Results of the CHIARA MIA 2 trial

Introduction

Adverse cardiac remodelling represents the most important risk factor for the development of heart failure (HF) after myocardial infarction (MI). Chymase is a protease that generates locally pro-fibrotic factors such as angiotensin II, TGFβ, and matrixmetallproteases that contribute to tissue remodelling.

Purpose

This phase IIa study examined the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on functional parameters of adverse cardiac remodelling after acute MI.

Methods

A double-blind, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed in patients after first STEMI who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24h of symptom onset. To enrich for patients at risk of adverse remodelling, main inclusion criteria were a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤45% and an infarct size>10% on day 5 to 9 post MI as measured by cardiac MRI. On day 6 to 12 post MI, patients were randomized to treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n=54) or placebo (n=53) twice daily on top of standard of care. The changes in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LVESVI from baseline to 6 months of treatment were analyzed by a central blinded cardiac MRI core laboratory.

Results

Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated, 64.8% of patients treated with fulacimstat and 75.5% of patients treated with placebo reported treatment emergent adverse events. Fulacimstat achieved exposures that were approximately 10-fold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. After six months of treatment, there were no effects of fulacimstat compared to placebo on the changes in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LVESVI (see Table).

Analysis of primary efficacy parameters Parameter Placebo Fulacimstat p-value LVEF (%) baseline 37.2±6.1 39.1±5.5 0.15 6 months 41.2±8.4 42.6±8.4 0.45 delta 4.0±5.0 3.5±5.4 0.69 LVEDVI (mL/m2) baseline 80.0±17.1 77.4±18.2 0.51 6 months 85.1±19.1 84.7±23.4 0.94 delta 5.1±18.9 7.3±13.3 0.54 LVESVI (mL/m2) baseline 50.5±13.0 47.3±12.3 0.26 6 months 51.1±16.9 49.6±18.1 0.71 delta 0.6±14.8 2.3±11.2 0.56 Data are given as mean ± standard deviation.

Conclusion

Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after first STEMI but had no effect on adverse cardiac remodelling in the experimental setting of this study.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The study was funded by its sponsor BAYER AG

Safety, Tolerability and efficacy of Rapid Optimization, helped by NT-proBNP and GDF-15, of Heart Failure therapies (STRONG-HF): rationale and design for a multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study

AIMS

Patients admitted for acute heart failure (HF) are at high risk of readmission and death, especially in the 90 days following discharge. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of early optimization of oral HF therapy with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) on 90-day clinical outcomes in patients admitted for acute HF.

METHODS

In a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, a total of 900 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 'usual care' or 'high-intensity care'. Patients enrolled in the usual care arm will be discharged and managed according to usual clinical practice at the site. In the high-intensity care arm, doses of oral HF medications - including a BB, ACEi or ARB, and MRA - will be up-titrated to 50% of recommended doses before discharge and to 100% of recommended doses within 2 weeks of discharge. Up-titration will be delayed if the patients develop worsening symptoms and signs of congestion, hyperkalaemia, hypotension, bradycardia, worsening of renal function or significant increase in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide between visits. The primary endpoint is 90-day all-cause mortality or HF readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

STRONG-HF is the first study to assess whether rapid up-titration of evidence-based guideline-recommended therapies with close follow-up in a large cohort of patients discharged from an acute HF admission is safe and can affect adverse outcomes during the first 90 days after discharge.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03412201.

Ghrelin and hormonal markers under exercise training in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results from the Ex-DHF pilot study

BACKGROUND

Over 50% of patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) experience HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Exercise training (ET) is effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness and dimensions of quality of life in patients with HFpEF. A systemic pro-inflammatory state induced by comorbidities as the cause of myocardial structural and functional alterations has been proposed in HFpEF. ET modifies myocardial structure and has been related to inflammatory state. We investigated Ghrelin, related adipokines, markers of inflammation, and neuro-hormonal activation in patients undergoing a structured ET vs. usual care are with HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ex-DHF-P was a prospective, controlled, randomized multi-centre trial on structured and supervised ET in patients with HFpEF. We performed a post hoc analysis in 62 patients from Ex-DHF-P. Ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, MR-proANP, MR-proADM, CT-proET1, and CT-proAVP were assessed to seize the impact of ET on these markers in patients with HFpEF. Thirty-six (58%) patients were female, mean age was 64 years, and median ghrelin was 928 pg/mL (interquartile range 755-1156). When stratified for high versus low ghrelin, groups significantly differed at baseline in presence obesity, waist circumference, and adiponectin levels (P < 0.05, respectively). Overall, ghrelin levels rose significantly to 1013 pg/mL (interquartile range 813-1182) (P < 0.001). Analysis of covariance modelling for change in ghrelin identified ET (P = 0.013) and higher baseline adiponectin levels (P = 0.035) as influencing factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise training tended to increase ghrelin levels in Ex-DHF-P. This increase was especially pronounced in patients with higher baseline adiponectin levels. Future trials are needed to investigate the effect of ET on endogenous ghrelin levels in regard to interactions with cardiac structure and clinically meaningful surrogate parameters.

Comparison of self-care behaviors of heart failure patients in 15 countries worldwide

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians worldwide seek to educate and support heart failure patients to engage in self-care. We aimed to describe self-care behaviors of patients from 15 countries across three continents.

METHODS

Data on self-care were pooled from 5964 heart failure patients from the United States, Europe, Australasia and South America. Data on self-care were collected with the Self-care of Heart Failure Index or the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale.

RESULTS

In all the samples, most patients reported taking their medications as prescribed but exercise and weight monitoring were low. In 14 of the 22 samples, more than 50% of the patients reported low exercise levels. In 16 samples, less than half of the patients weighed themselves regularly, with large differences among the countries. Self-care with regard to receiving an annual flu shot and following a low sodium diet varied most across the countries.

CONCLUSION

Self-care behaviors are sub-optimal in heart failure patients and need to be improved worldwide.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Interventions that focus on specific self-care behaviors may be more effective than general educational programs. Changes in some health care systems and national policies are needed to support patients with heart failure to increase their self-care behavior.