Collection of human and environmental data on pesticide use in Europe and Argentina: Field study protocol for the SPRINT project

Current farm systems rely on the use of Plant Protection Products (PPP) to secure high productivity and control threats to the quality of the crops. However, PPP use may have considerable impacts on human health and the environment. A study protocol is presented aiming to determine the occurrence and levels of PPP residues in plants (crops), animals (livestock), humans and other non-target species (ecosystem representatives) for exposure modelling and impact assessment. To achieve this, we designed a cross-sectional study to compare conventional and organic farm systems across Europe. Environmental and biological samples were/are being/will be collected during the 2021 growing season, at 10 case study sites in Europe covering a range of climate zones and crops. An additional study site in Argentina will inform the impact of PPP use on growing soybean which is an important European protein-source in animal feed. We will study the impact of PPP mixtures using an integrated risk assessment methodology. The fate of PPP in environmental media (soil, water and air) and in the homes of farmers will be monitored. This will be complemented by biomonitoring to estimate PPP uptake by humans and farm animals (cow, goat, sheep and chicken), and by collection of samples from non-target species (earthworms, fish, aquatic and terrestrial macroinvertebrates, bats, and farm cats). We will use data on PPP residues in environmental and biological matrices to estimate exposures by modelling. These exposure estimates together with health and toxicity data will be used to predict the impact of PPP use on environment, plant, animal and human health. The outcome of this study will then be integrated with socio-economic information leading to an overall assessment used to identify transition pathways towards more sustainable plant protection and inform decision makers, practitioners and other stakeholders regarding farming practices and land use policy.

[Behaviour therapy in the practice management of a veterinary practice. Survey among practicing veterinarians and veterinarians specializing in behaviour therapy]

OBJECTIVE

of the study was to investigate whether behaviour therapy may be an economic niche within practice management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was used to analyze to what extent veterinarians have already applied behaviour therapy (BT) and how they evaluate economic efficiency and patient owners' attitude. The descriptive analysis included the data from 312 practicing veterinarians (167 randomly selected, interviewed and 145 signed on for training sessions, veterinarians) and of 23 veterinarians specialized in BT.

RESULTS

Two-thirds (67% of n=288) of the practicing veterinarians offered BT in their practices. The economic efficiency of BT was evaluated as positive by 64% (of n=281) of the practicing veterinarians and by 83% (of n=23) of specialists. 32% (of n = 146) of practitioners who offered behavioural therapy confirmed an increase in sales through the application of BT. Among the specialists, 84% (of n=19) confirmed this experience. In comparison to the specialists and literature data, most of the practicing veterinarians spent insufficient time (61% of n=180) for a behaviour consultation. Furthermore, most of them (86% of n=162) charged less for BT than the amounts fixed by the German Payment Regulations (Gebührenordnung für Tierärzte), as compared to the specialists.

CONCLUSION

The specialized veterinarians offered, in contrast to most practitioners, a consultation of BT with sufficiently calculated time and accurate payment planning to realise a therapeutic and commercial outcome. Therefore, the assessment of the economic efficiency of BT and their sales increase through BT were better than the estimation of the practicing veterinarians. Behaviour therapy cannot be managed by providing advice free of charge or charging less. Veterinarians have to become aware that BT is a veterinary area of specialization for which an adequate qualification is necessary. If the veterinarian is not specialized in BT he should refer to a qualified colleague.