1
|
Reyhani A, Gimson E, Baker C, Kelly M, Maisey N, Meenan J, Subesinghe M, Hill M, Lagergren J, Gossage J, Zeki S, Dunn J, Davies A. Multiple staging investigations may not change management in patients with high-grade dysplasia or early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doad020. [PMID: 37032121 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
The clinical value of multiple staging investigations for high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is unclear. A single-center prospective cohort of patients treated for early esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2019 was analyzed. This coincided with a transition period from esophagectomy to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the treatment of choice. Patients were staged with computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography(PET)/CT. The aim of this study was to assess their accuracy and impact on clinical management. 297 patients with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma were included (endoscopic therapy/EMR n = 184; esophagectomy n = 113 [of which a 'combined' group had surgery preceded by endoscopic therapy n = 23]). Staging accuracy was low (accurate staging EMR: CT 40.1%, EUS 29.6%, FDG-PET/CT 11.0%; Esophagectomy: CT 43.3%, EUS 59.7%, FDG-PET/CT 29.6%; Combined: CT 28.6%, EUS46.2%, FDG-PET/CT 30.0%). Staging inaccuracies across all groups that could have changed management by missing T2 disease were CT 12%, EUS 12% and FDG-PET/CT 1.6%. The sensitivity of all techniques for detecting nodal disease was low (CT 12.5%, EUS 12.5%, FDG-PET/CT0.0%). Overall, FDG-PET/CT and EUS changed decision-making in only 3.2% of patients with an early cancer on CT and low-risk histology. The accuracy of staging with EUS, CT and FDG-PET/CT in patients with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is low. EUS and FDG-PET/CT added relevant staging information over standard CT in very few cases, and therefore, these investigations should be used selectively. Factors predicting the need for esophagectomy are predominantly obtained from EMR histology rather than staging investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Reyhani
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - E Gimson
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C Baker
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - M Kelly
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - N Maisey
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Meenan
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - M Subesinghe
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
- Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Hill
- Department of Oncology, Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Gossage
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Zeki
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Dunn
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Davies
- Oesophagogastric research group, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Centre, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frisell A, Bergman O, Khan A, Gisterå A, Fisher RM, Lagergren J, de Boniface J, Halle M. Capsular inflammation after immediate breast reconstruction - Gene expression patterns and inflammatory cell infiltration in irradiated and non-irradiated breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 76:18-26. [PMID: 36512998 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsular contracture following post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is commonly seen in patients undergoing implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Further understanding of the underlying biology is needed for the development of preventive or therapeutic strategies. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of gene expression patterns in capsular tissue from breast cancer patients who had received versus those who had not received PMRT after implant-based IBR. METHODS Biopsies from irradiated and healthy non-irradiated capsular tissue were harvested during implant exchange following IBR. Biopsies from irradiated (n = 13) and non-irradiated (n = 12) capsules were compared using Affymetrix microarrays to identify the most differentially regulated genes. Further analysis using immunohistochemistry was performed in a subset of materials to compare the presence of T cells, B cells, and macrophages. RESULTS Enrichment testing using Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the 227 most differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in an inflammatory response. Twenty-one GO biological processes were identified [p < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 5%], several with B-cell-associated inflammation. Cell-type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) analysis identified macrophages as the most common inflammatory cell type in both groups, further supported by immunostaining of CD68. Radiation remarkably increased B-cell infiltration in the capsular region of biopsies, as quantified by immunostaining of CD20 (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Transcript analysis and immunohistochemistry revealed inflammatory responses in capsular biopsies regardless of radiotherapy. However, the radiation response specifically involved B-cell-associated inflammatory responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Dermatology, Theme Inflammation and Infection, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Bergman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Bioclinicum J8:20, Visionsgatan 4, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Khan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Gisterå
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Bioclinicum J8:20, Visionsgatan 4, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R M Fisher
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Bioclinicum J8:20, Visionsgatan 4, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Halle
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jamaly S, Lundberg C, Adiels A, Lagergren J, Bjorck L, Rosengren A. Incidence of type 2 diabetes after gastric by-pass surgery in a Swedish controlled cohort study. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
To assess the long-term risk of developing type 2 diabetes in patients with obesity who have undergone gastric bypass surgery compared to non-operated patients with obesity and the general population.
Methods and results
This study included 55,534 patients aged 20–65 years with a principal diagnosis of obesity in the Swedish Patient Register in 2001–2013. Of these, 23,099 had undergone gastric bypass and 32,435 had not. Each patient was matched by age, sex and geographic region with two population controls from the general population without an obesity diagnosis, i.e., 44,735 controls for the gastric bypass patients and 62,522 controls for the non-operated cohort with obesity. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.4, 7.1 years), 3,761 (11.6%) non-operated patients with obesity developed type 2 diabetes (incidence rate 226.0 per 1,000 person-years, confidence interval [CI] 218.8–233.4) compared to 381 (1.6%) among gastric bypass patients (incidence rate 38.7 per 1,000 person-years CI 34.7–43.5). The latter incidence was comparable to population controls incidence rate (34.7 per 1,000 person-years CI 31.7–38.2). Operated and non-operated patients with obesity were also directly compared using Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, education, and sex, and showed gastric bypass patients had an 85% lower risk of developing diabetes compared to non-operated patients with obesity during the first six years of follow-up (hazard ratio 0.14; 95% CI 0.12–0.17).
Conclusion
Gastric bypass surgery for obesity seems to reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes to levels similar to that of the general population during the first six years of follow-up, but not thereafter.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Swedish government and the county councils concerning economic support of research and education of doctorsSwedish Heart and Lung FoundationSwedish Research Council
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Jamaly
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - C Lundberg
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - A Adiels
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Molecular Medicine and?Surgery , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - L Bjorck
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - A Rosengren
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine , Gothenburg , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore JL, Davies AR, Santaolalla A, Van Hemelrijck M, Maisey N, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Kelly M, Baker CR. Clinical Relevance of the Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification System for Gastric Cancer in a Western Population. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3911-3920. [PMID: 35041098 PMCID: PMC9072452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11252-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification (MLC) system combines Laurén histologic subtype and anatomic tumor location. It divides gastric tumors into proximal non-diffuse (PND), distal non-diffuse (DND), and diffuse (D) types. The optimum classification of patients with Laurén mixed tumors in this system is not clear due to its grouping with both diffuse and non-diffuse types in previous studies. The clinical relevance of the MLC in a Western population has not been examined. Methods A cohort study investigated 404 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2020. The classification of Laurén mixed tumors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics (chi-square). Survival analysis was performed using multivariable Cox regression. Results The ROC curve analysis demonstrated a slightly higher area under the curve value for predicting survival when Laurén mixed tumors were grouped with intestinal-type rather than diffuse-type tumors (0.58 vs 0.57). Survival, tumor recurrence, and resection margin positivity in mixed tumors also was more similar to intestinal type. Distal non-diffuse tumors had the best 5-year survival (DND 64.7 % vs PND 56.1 % vs diffuse 45.1 %; p = 0.006) and were least likely to have recurrence (DND 27.0 % vs PND 34.3 % vs diffuse 48.3 %; p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that MLC was an independent prognostic factor for survival (PND: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.16–2.32 vs diffuse: HR, 2.20; 95 % CI, 1.56–3.09) Conclusions The MLC was an independent prognostic marker in this Western cohort of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. The patients with PND and D tumors had worse survival than those with DND tumors.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-11252-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Moore
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. .,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.
| | - A R Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - A Santaolalla
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.,Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.,Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - M Kelly
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yanes M, Santoni G, Maret-Ouda J, Ness-Jensen E, Färkkilä M, Lynge E, Pukkala E, Romundstad P, Tryggvadóttir L, -Chelpin MVE, Lagergren J. Survival after antireflux surgery versus medication in patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus: multinational cohort study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:864-870. [PMID: 33724340 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to examine the hypothesis that antireflux surgery with fundoplication improves long-term survival compared with antireflux medication in patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus. METHOD Individuals aged between 18 and 70 years with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus (intestinal metaplasia) documented from in-hospital and specialized outpatient care were selected from national patient registries in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, and Sweden from 1980 to 2014. The study investigated all-cause mortality and disease-specific mortality, comparing patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic antireflux surgery with fundoplication versus those using antireflux medication. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals for all-cause mortality and disease-specific mortality, adjusted for sex, age, calendar period, country, and co-morbidity. RESULTS Some 240 226 patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus were included, of whom 33 904 (14.1 per cent) underwent antireflux surgery. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower after antireflux surgery than with use of medication (HR 0.61, 95 per cent c.i. 0.58 to 0.63), and lower after laparoscopic (HR 0.56, 0.52 to 0.60) than open (HR 0.80, 0.70 to 0.91) surgery. After antireflux surgery, mortality was decreased from cardiovascular disease (HR 0.58, 0.55 to 0.61), respiratory disease (HR 0.62, 0.57 to 0.66), laryngeal or pharyngeal cancer (HR 0.35, 0.19 to 0.65), and lung cancer (HR 0.67, 0.58 to 0.80), but not from oesophageal cancer (HR 1.05, 0.87 to 1.28), compared with medication, The decreased mortality rates generally remained over time. CONCLUSION In patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus, antireflux surgery is associated with lower mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, laryngeal or pharyngeal cancer, and lung cancer, but not from oesophageal cancer, compared with antireflux medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Yanes
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Santoni
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Maret-Ouda
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - E Ness-Jensen
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim/Levanger, Norway.,Medical Department, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - M Färkkilä
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Lynge
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Pukkala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland.,Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - P Romundstad
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim/Levanger, Norway
| | - L Tryggvadóttir
- Icelandic Cancer Registry, Icelandic Cancer Society, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheng Z, Johar A, Gottlieb-Vedi E, Nilsson M, Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Impact of co-morbidity on reoperation or death within 90 days of surgery for oesophageal cancer. BJS Open 2021; 5:6073399. [PMID: 33609378 PMCID: PMC7893455 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of preoperative co-morbidity on postoperative outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer is uncertain. A population-based and nationwide cohort study was conducted to assess the influence of preoperative co-morbidity on the risk of reoperation or mortality within 90 days of surgery for oesophageal cancer. Methods This study enrolled 98 per cent of patients who had oesophageal cancer surgery between 1987 and 2015 in Sweden. Modified Poisson regression models provided risk ratios (RRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) to estimate associations between co-morbidity and risk of reoperation or death within 90 days of oesophagectomy. The RRs were adjusted for age, sex, educational level, pathological tumour stage, neoadjuvant therapy, annual hospital volume, tumour histology and calendar period of surgery. Results Among 2576 patients, 446 (17.3 per cent) underwent reoperation or died within 90 days of oesophagectomy. Patients with a Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) score of 2 or more had an increased risk of reoperation or death compared with those with a CCI score of 0 (RR 1.78, 95 per cent c.i. 1.44 to 2.20), and the risk increased on average by 27 per cent for each point increase of the CCI (RR 1.27, 1.18 to 1.37). The RR was increased in patients with pulmonary disease (RR 1.66, 1.36 to 2.04), cardiac disease (RR 1.37, 1.08 to 1.73), diabetes (RR 1.50, 1.14 to 1.99) and cerebral disease (RR 1.40, 1.06 to 1.85). Conclusion Co-morbidity in general, and pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, diabetes and cerebral disease in particular, increased the risk of reoperation or death within 90 days of oesophageal cancer surgery. This highlights the value of tailored patient selection, preoperative preparation and postoperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Cheng
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Gottlieb-Vedi
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bott RK, Beckmann K, Zylstra J, Wilkinson MJ, Knight WRC, Baker CR, Kelly M, Maisey N, Qureshi A, Sevitt T, Van Hemelrijck M, Smyth EC, Allum WH, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Cunningham D, Davies AR. Adjuvant therapy following oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma in patients with a positive resection margin. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1801-1810. [PMID: 32990343 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy is contentious. In UK practice, surgical resection margin status is often used to classify patients for receiving adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with positive (R1) resection margins. METHODS Two prospectively collected UK institutional databases were combined to identify eligible patients. Adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival according to adjuvant treatment. Recurrence patterns were assessed as a secondary outcome. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed. RESULTS Of 616 patients included in the combined database, 242 patients who had an R1 resection were included in the study. Of these, 112 patients (46·3 per cent) received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 46 (19·0 per cent) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and 84 (34·7 per cent) had no adjuvant treatment. In adjusted analysis, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0·59, 95 per cent c.i. 0·38 to 0·94; P = 0·026), with a benefit in terms of both local (HR 0·48, 0·24 to 0·99; P = 0·047) and systemic (HR 0·56, 0·33 to 0·94; P = 0·027) recurrence. In analyses stratified by tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-responders (Mandard tumour regression grade 4-5) treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had an overall survival benefit (HR 0·61, 0·38 to 0·97; P = 0·037). In propensity score-matched analysis, an overall survival benefit (HR 0·62, 0·39 to 0·98; P = 0·042) and recurrence-free survival benefit (HR 0·51, 0·30 to 0·87; P = 0·004) were observed for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus no adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy may improve overall survival and recurrence-free survival after margin-positive resection. This pattern seems most pronounced with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R K Bott
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - K Beckmann
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK.,University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital
| | - M J Wilkinson
- Departments of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, London, UK
| | - W R C Knight
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - M Kelly
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - N Maisey
- Departments of Medical Oncology, London, UK
| | - A Qureshi
- Clinical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - T Sevitt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - E C Smyth
- Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - W H Allum
- Departments of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - D Cunningham
- Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A R Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frisell A, Lagergren J, Halle M, de Boniface J. Risk factors for implant failure following revision surgery in breast cancer patients with a previous immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:977-984. [PMID: 32920741 PMCID: PMC7655578 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05911-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the current study was to evaluate risk factors and timing of revision surgery following immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Methods This retrospective cohort included women with a previous therapeutic mastectomy and implant-based IBR who had undergone implant revision surgery between 2005 and 2015. Data were collected by medical chart review and registered in the Stockholm Breast Reconstruction Database. The primary endpoint was implant removal due to surgical complications, i.e. implant failure. Results The cohort consisted of 475 women with 707 revisions in 542 breasts. Overall, 33 implants were removed due to complications. The implant failure rate (4.7%) was lower without RT (2.4%) compared to RT administered after mastectomy (7.5%) and prior to IBR (6.5%) (p = 0.007). While post-mastectomy RT (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.53–7.53), smoking (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.76–8.65) and diabetes (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.05–27.85) were confirmed as risk factors, time from completion of RT (> 9 months, 6–9 months, < 6 months) was not (OR 3.17, 95% CI 0.78–12.80, and OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.20–2.71). Additional risk factors were a previous axillary clearance (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.09–11.53) and a history of a post-IBR infection (OR 15.52, 95% CI 4.15–58.01, and OR 12.93, 95% CI 3.04–55.12, for oral and intravenous antibiotics, respectively). Conclusions Previous axillary clearance and a history of post-IBR infection emerged as novel risk factors for implant failure after revision surgery. While known risk factors were confirmed, time elapsed from RT completion to revision surgery did not influence the outcome in this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Halle
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.,Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lohmander F, Lagergren J, Johansson H, Roy PG, Frisell J, Brandberg Y. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial. BJS Open 2020; 4:811-820. [PMID: 32762012 PMCID: PMC7528522 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant‐based breast reconstructions (IBBRs) aims to improve cosmetic outcomes. Six‐month data are presented from a randomized trial evaluating whether IBBR with ADM provides higher health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient‐reported cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional IBBR without ADM. Methods In this multicentre open‐label RCT, women with breast cancer planned for mastectomy with immediate IBBR in four centres in Sweden and one in the UK were allocated randomly (1 : 1) to IBBR with or without ADM. HRQoL, a secondary endpoint, was measured as patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) using three validated instruments (EORTC‐QLQC30, QLQ‐BR23, QLQ‐BRR26) at baseline and 6 months. Results Between 24 April 2014 and 10 May 2017, 135 women were enrolled, of whom 64 with and 65 without ADM were included in the final analysis. At 6 months after surgery, patient‐reported HRQoL, measured with generic QLQ‐C30 or breast cancer‐specific QLQ‐BR23, was similar between the groups. For patient‐reported cosmetic outcomes, two subscale items, cosmetic outcome (8·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·46 to 16·86; P = 0·041) and problems finding a well‐fitting bra (−13·21, −25·54 to −0·89; P = 0·038), yielded higher scores in favour of ADM, corresponding to a small to moderate clinical difference. None of the other 27 domains measured showed any significant differences between the groups. Conclusion IBBR with ADM was not superior in terms of higher levels of HRQoL compared with IBBR without ADM. Although two subscale items of patient‐reported cosmetic outcomes favoured ADM, the majority of cosmetic items showed no significant difference between treatments at 6 months. Registration number: NCT02061527 (
www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Lohmander
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Section of Breast Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P G Roy
- Department of Breast Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Y Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kauppila J, Santoni G, Tao W, Koivukangas V, Tryggvadóttir L, Ness-Jensen E, Romundstad P, von Euler-Chelpin M, Lagergren J. Author response to: Comment on: Reintervention or mortality within 90 days of bariatric surgery: a population-based cohort study Validity and power of Nordic registry-based research. Br J Surg 2020; 107:e350. [PMID: 32497245 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Kauppila
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Santoni
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - W Tao
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - V Koivukangas
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Tryggvadóttir
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Ness-Jensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Romundstad
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M von Euler-Chelpin
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kauppila JH, Santoni G, Tao W, Lynge E, Koivukangas V, Tryggvadóttir L, Ness-Jensen E, Romundstad P, Pukkala E, von Euler-Chelpin M, Lagergren J. Reintervention or mortality within 90 days of bariatric surgery: population-based cohort study. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1221-1230. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Bariatric surgery carries a risk of severe postoperative complications, sometimes leading to reinterventions or even death. The incidence and risk factors for reintervention and death within 90 days after bariatric surgery are unclear, and were examined in this study.
Methods
This population-based cohort study included all patients who underwent bariatric surgery in one of the five Nordic countries between 1980 and 2012. Data on surgical and endoscopic procedures, diagnoses and mortality were retrieved from national high-quality and complete registries. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for country, age, sex, co-morbidity, type of surgery and approach, year and hospital volume of bariatric surgery.
Results
Of 49 977 patients, 1111 (2·2 per cent) had a reintervention and 95 (0·2 per cent) died within 90 days of bariatric surgery. Risk factors for the composite outcome reintervention/mortality were older age (HR 1·65, 95 per cent c.i. 1·36 to 2·01, for age at least 50 years versus less than 30 years) and co-morbidity (HR 2·66, 1·53 to 4·62, for Charlson co-morbidity index score 2 or more versus 0). The risk of reintervention/mortality was decreased for vertical banded gastroplasty compared with gastric bypass (HR 0·37, 0·28 to 0·48) and more recent surgery (HR 0·51, 0·39 to 0·67, for procedures undertaken in 2010 or later versus before 2000). Sex, surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open) and hospital volume did not influence risk of reintervention/mortality, but laparoscopic surgery was associated with a lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR 0·29, 0·16 to 0·53).
Conclusion
Reintervention and death were uncommon events within 90 days of bariatric surgery even in this unselected nationwide cohort from five countries. Older patients with co-morbidities have an increased relative risk of these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Kauppila
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Centre Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - G Santoni
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - W Tao
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Lynge
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - V Koivukangas
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Centre Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - L Tryggvadóttir
- Icelandic Cancer Registry, Icelandic Cancer Society, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, Laeknagardur, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - E Ness-Jensen
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - P Romundstad
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - E Pukkala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Frisell A, Lagergren J, Halle M, de Boniface J. Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision-making. BJS Open 2020; 4:232-240. [PMID: 32003544 PMCID: PMC7093785 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates in breast cancer differ between healthcare regions in Sweden. This is not explained by regional differences in patient age distribution or tumour characteristics, but by differences in patient‐reported information and patient involvement in the decision‐making process. As socioeconomic status may play a significant role in surgical decision‐making, its potential associations with IBR rates were analysed. Methods Women who had undergone therapeutic mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included in the analysis. Tumour and treatment data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register, and socioeconomic background data from the Central Bureau of Statistics Sweden. Postal questionnaires regarding information about reconstruction and perceived involvement in the preoperative decision‐making process had been sent out in a previous survey. Results In addition to regional differences, lower tumour and nodal category, independent factors increasing the likelihood of having IBR for the 3131 women in the study were living without a registered partner, having current employment and high income per household. Patient‐reported perceived preoperative information (odds ratio (OR) 12·73, 95 per cent c.i. 6·03 to 26·89) and the feeling of being involved in the decision‐making process (OR 2·56, 1·14 to 5·76) remained strong independent predictors of IBR despite adjustment for socioeconomic factors. Importantly, responders to the survey represented a relatively young and wealthy population with a lower tumour burden. Conclusion Several socioeconomic factors independently influence IBR rates; however, patient‐reported information and involvement in the surgical decision‐making process remain independent predictors for the likelihood of having IBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Halle
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frisell A, Lagergren J, Halle M, de Boniface J. Socioeconomic status differs between breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and breast conservation, and affects patient-reported preoperative information. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 179:721-729. [PMID: 31735998 PMCID: PMC6997274 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05496-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer treatment is reported to be influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). Few reports, however, stem from national, equality-based health care systems. The aim of this study was to analyse associations between SES, rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), patient-reported preoperative information and perceived involvement in Sweden. METHODS All women operated for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour and treatment data as well as socioeconomic data were retrieved from national registers. Postal questionnaires regarding preoperative information about breast-conserving options and perceived involvement in the decision-making process had previously been sent to all women receiving mastectomy. RESULTS Of 7735 women, 4604 (59.5%) received BCS. In addition to regional differences, independent predictors of BCS were being in the middle or higher age groups, having small tumours without clinically involved nodes, being born in Europe outside Sweden, having a higher education than primary school and an intermediate or high income per household. Women with smaller, clinically node-negative tumours felt more often involved in the surgical decision and informed about breast-conserving options (both p < 0.001). In addition, women who perceived that BCS was discussed as an alternative to mastectomy were more often in a partnership (p < 0.001), not born in Sweden (p = 0.035) and had an employment (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION Socioeconomic factors are associated with surgical treatment even in a national health care system that is expected to offer all women the same standard of care. This should be taken into account and adapted to in preoperative counselling on surgical options in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, L1:00, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, L1:00, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Halle
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, L1:00, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, L1:00, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brusselaers N, Tamimi RM, Konings P, Rosner B, Adami HO, Lagergren J. Different menopausal hormone regimens and risk of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1771-1776. [PMID: 29917061 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are considerable knowledge gaps concerning different estrogen and progestin formulations, regimens, and modes of administration of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk of breast cancer. Our objective was to assess the different treatment options for menopausal HT and the risk of breast cancer. Patients and methods This Swedish prospective nationwide cohort study included all women who received ≥1 HT prescription during the study period 2005-2012 (290 186 ever-users), group-level matched (1 : 3) to 870 165 never-users; respectively, 6376 (2.2%) and 18 754 (2.2%) developed breast cancer. HT, ascertained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, was subdivided by estrogen and progestogen formulation types, regimens (continuous versus sequential) and modes of administration (oral versus transdermal). The risk of invasive breast cancer was presented as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Results Current use of estrogen-only therapy was associated with a slight excess breast cancer risk [odds ratio (OR) = 1.08 (1.02-1.14)]. The risk for current estrogen plus progestogen therapy was higher [OR = 1.77 (1.69-1.85)] and increased with higher age at initiation [OR = 3.59 (3.30-3.91) in women 70+ years]. In contrast, past use was associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Current continuous estrogen/progestin use was associated with higher risk [OR = 2.18 (1.99-2.40) for progesterone-derived; OR = 2.66 (2.49-2.84) for testosterone-derived] than sequential use [OR = 1.37 (0.97-1.92) for progesterone-derived; OR = 1.12 (0.96-1.30) for testosterone-derived]. The OR for current use was 1.12 (1.04-1.20) for estradiol, 0.76 (0.69-0.84) for estriol, 4.47 (2.67-7.48) for conjugated estrogens, and 1.68 (1.51-1.87) for tibolone. Oral and cutaneous HT showed similar associations. Conclusion Different HT regimens have profoundly different effects on breast cancer risk. Because of registry limitations some confounders could not be assessed. This knowledge may guide clinical decision-making when HT is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Brusselaers
- Department of Microbiology, Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - R M Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - P Konings
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - B Rosner
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - H-O Adami
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Knight WRC, Yip C, Wulaningsih W, Jacques A, Griffin N, Zylstra J, Van Hemelrijck M, Maisey N, Gaya A, Baker CR, Kelly M, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Landau D, Goh V, Davies AR, Ngan S, Qureshi A, Deere H, Green M, Chang F, Mahadeva U, Gill‐Barman B, George S, Dunn J, Zeki S, Meenan J, Hynes O, Tham G, Iezzi C. Prediction of a positive circumferential resection margin at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. BJS Open 2019; 3:767-776. [PMID: 31832583 PMCID: PMC6887675 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been associated with higher rates of locoregional recurrence and worse survival in oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to establish if clinicopathological and radiological variables might predict CRM positivity in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods Multivariable analysis of clinicopathological and CT imaging characteristics considered potentially predictive of CRM was performed at initial staging and following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prediction models were constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) from 1000 bootstrapping was assessed. Results A total of 223 patients were included in the study. Poor differentiation (odds ratio (OR) 2·84, 95 per cent c.i. 1·39 to 6·01) and advanced clinical tumour status (T3-4) (OR 2·93, 1·03 to 9·48) were independently associated with an increased CRM risk at diagnosis. CT-assessed lack of response (stable or progressive disease) following chemotherapy independently corresponded with an increased risk of CRM positivity (OR 3·38, 1·43 to 8·50). Additional CT evidence of local invasion and higher CT tumour volume (14 cm3) improved the performance of a prediction model, including all the above parameters, with an AUC (c-index) of 0·76 (0·67 to 0·83). Variables associated with significantly higher rates of locoregional recurrence were pN status (P = 0·020), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0·007) and poor response to chemotherapy (Mandard score 4-5) (P = 0·006). CRM positivity was associated with a higher locoregional recurrence rate, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0·092). Conclusion The presence of advanced cT status, poor tumour differentiation, and CT-assessed lack of response to chemotherapy, higher tumour volume and local invasion can be used to identify patients at risk of a positive CRM following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. R. C. Knight
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
| | - C. Yip
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London
| | - W. Wulaningsih
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London
| | - A. Jacques
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - N. Griffin
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J. Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
| | - M. Van Hemelrijck
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London
| | - N. Maisey
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - A. Gaya
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - C. R. Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
| | - M. Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
| | - J. A. Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J. Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D. Landau
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - V. Goh
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London
| | - A. R. Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Substantial weight loss and eating problems are common before and after esophagectomy for cancer. The use of jejunostomy might prevent postoperative weight loss, but studies evaluating other outcomes are scarce. This study aims to assess the influence of jejunostomy on postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL), complications, reoperation, hospital stay, and survival. This prospective and population-based cohort study included all patients operated on for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer in Sweden in 2001-2005 with follow-up until 31st December 2016. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics and treatment were prospectively collected. Multivariable logistic regression provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), whereas Cox regression provided hazard ratios with 95% CI. All risk estimates were adjusted for age, sex, tumor histology, stage, comorbidity, surgical approach, neoadjuvant therapy, and body mass index and weight loss at baseline. Among 397 patients, 181 (46%) received a jejunostomy during surgery. The use of jejunostomy did not influence the HRQOL at 6 months or 3 years after treatment. Jejunostomy users had no statistically significantly increased risk of postoperative complications (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.86-1.87) or reoperation (OR 1.70; 95% CI 0.88-3.28). Intensive unit care and length of hospital stay was the same independent of the use of jejunostomy. The all-cause mortality was not increased in the jejunostomy group (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-1.07). This study indicates that jejunostomy does not influence postoperative HRQOL, complications, or survival after esophageal cancer surgery, it can be considered a safe method for early enteral nutrition after esophageal cancer surgery but benefits for the patients need further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Klevebro
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Helminen O, Kytö V, Kauppila JH, Gunn J, Lagergren J, Sihvo E. Population-based study of anastomotic stricture rates after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS Open 2019; 3:634-640. [PMID: 31592081 PMCID: PMC6773660 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The population‐based incidence of anastomotic stricture after minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) and open oesophagectomy (OO) is not known. The aim of this study was to compare rates of anastomotic stricture requiring dilatation after the two approaches in an unselected cohort using nationwide data from Finland and Sweden. Methods All patients who had MIO or OO for oesophageal cancer between 2007 and 2014 were identified from nationwide registries in Finland and Sweden. Outcomes were the overall rate of anastomotic stricture and need for single or repeated (3 or more) dilatations for stricture within the first year after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals, adjusted for age, sex, co‐morbidity, histology, stage, year, country, hospital volume, length of hospital stay and readmissions. Results Some 239 patients underwent MIO and 1430 had an open procedure. The incidence of strictures requiring one dilatation was 16·7 per cent, and that for strictures requiring three or more dilatations was 6·6 per cent. The HR for strictures requiring one dilatation was not increased after MIO compared with that after OO (HR 1·19, 95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 2·12), but was threefold higher for repeated dilatations (HR 3·25, 1·43 to 7·36). Of 18 strictures following MIO, 14 (78 per cent) occurred during the first 2 years after initiating this approach. Conclusion The need for endoscopic anastomotic dilatation after oesophagectomy was common, and the need for repeated dilatation was higher after MIO than following OO. The increased risk after MIO may reflect a learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Helminen
- Department of Surgery Central Finland Central Hospital Jyväskylä Finland.,Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Centre Oulu University of Oulu Oulu Finland.,Department of Surgery Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland
| | - V Kytö
- Heart Centre Turku University Hospital Turku Finland.,Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine University of Turku Turku Finland
| | - J H Kauppila
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Centre Oulu University of Oulu Oulu Finland.,Department of Surgery Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
| | - J Gunn
- Heart Centre Turku University Hospital Turku Finland.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine University of Turku Turku Finland
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences King's College London London UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - E Sihvo
- Department of Surgery Central Finland Central Hospital Jyväskylä Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kilander C, Lagergren J, Konings P, Sadr-Azodi O, Brusselaers N. Menopausal hormone therapy and biliary tract cancer: a population-based matched cohort study in Sweden. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:290-295. [PMID: 30656997 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1549367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study tested the hypothesis that contemporary menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) increases the risk of biliary tract cancer. The risk of cancer of the biliary tract (gallbladder and extra-hepatic bile ducts) may be increased following estrogen exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a nationwide population-based matched cohort study in Sweden. Data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register identified all women exposed to systemic MHT in 2005-2012. Group-level matching (1:3 ratio) was used to select women unexposed to MHT from the same study base, matched for history of delivery, thrombotic events, hysterectomy, age, smoking- and alcohol related diseases, obesity, and diabetes. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Comparing 290,186 women exposed to MHT with 870,165 unexposed, MHT did not increase the OR of biliary tract cancer. The OR of gallbladder cancer was rather decreased in MHT users (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.79), but this association became attenuated and statistically non-significant after adjusting for gallstone disease (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60-1.15). The OR of extra-hepatic bile duct cancers was 0.83 (95% CI 0.61-1.15). There were no clear differences when the analyses were stratified for estrogen or estrogen/progestogen combinations. MHT increased the risk of gallstone disease (OR 6.95, 95% CI 6.64-7.28). CONCLUSIONS Contemporary MHT does not seem to increase the risk of biliary tract cancer. The decreased risk of gallbladder cancer may be explained by the increased use of surgery for symptomatic gallstones in MHT users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Kilander
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J. Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - P. Konings
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - O. Sadr-Azodi
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Clinical Research: Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - N. Brusselaers
- Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell biology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smyth EC, Nyamundanda G, Cunningham D, Fontana E, Ragulan C, Tan IB, Lin SJ, Wotherspoon A, Nankivell M, Fassan M, Lampis A, Hahne JC, Davies AR, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Maisey N, Green M, Zylstra JL, Allum WH, Langley RE, Tan P, Valeri N, Sadanandam A. A seven-Gene Signature assay improves prognostic risk stratification of perioperative chemotherapy treated gastroesophageal cancer patients from the MAGIC trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:2356-2362. [PMID: 30481267 PMCID: PMC6311954 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastroesophageal cancer, lymph node metastasis is the only validated prognostic variable; however, within lymph node groups there is still heterogeneity with risk of relapse. We hypothesized that gene profiles from neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated resection specimens from gastroesophageal cancer patients can be used to define prognostic risk groups to identify patients at risk for relapse. Patients and methods The Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial (n = 202 with high quality RNA) samples treated with perioperative chemotherapy were profiled for a custom gastric cancer gene panel using the NanoString platform. Genes associated with overall survival (OS) were identified using penalized and standard Cox regression, followed by generation of risk scores and development of a NanoString biomarker assay to stratify patients into risk groups associated with OS. An independent dataset served as a validation cohort. Results Regression and clustering analysis of MAGIC patients defined a seven-Gene Signature and two risk groups with different OS [hazard ratio (HR) 5.1; P < 0.0001]. The median OS of high- and low-risk groups were 10.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 6.5 and 13.2 months] and 80.9 months (CI: 43.0 months and not assessable), respectively. Risk groups were independently prognostic of lymph node metastasis by multivariate analysis (HR 3.6 in node positive group, P = 0.02; HR 3.6 in high-risk group, P = 0.0002), and not prognostic in surgery only patients (n = 118; log rank P = 0.2). A validation cohort independently confirmed these findings. Conclusions These results suggest that gene-based risk groups can independently predict prognosis in gastroesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This signature and associated assay may help risk stratify these patients for post-surgery chemotherapy in future perioperative chemotherapy-based clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Nyamundanda
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Cunningham
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Fontana
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Ragulan
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - I B Tan
- Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - S J Lin
- Bioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia; Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - M Nankivell
- Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Fassan
- Department of Pathology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - A Lampis
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - J C Hahne
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - J Lagergren
- Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - N Maisey
- Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Green
- Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J L Zylstra
- Department of Pathology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - R E Langley
- Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, University College London, London, UK
| | - P Tan
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - N Valeri
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Sadanandam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davies AR, Myoteri D, Zylstra J, Baker CR, Wulaningsih W, Van Hemelrijck M, Maisey N, Allum WH, Smyth E, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Cunningham D, Green M. Lymph node regression and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1639-1649. [PMID: 30047556 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to define the pathological response in lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma and to quantify any associated survival benefit. METHODS Lymph nodes retrieved at oesophagectomy were examined retrospectively by two pathologists for evidence of a response to chemotherapy. Patients were classified as lymph node-negative (either negative nodes with no evidence of previous tumour involvement or negative with evidence of complete regression) or positive (allocated a lymph node regression score based on the proportion of fibrosis to residual tumour). Lymph node responders (score 1, complete response; 2, less than 10 per cent remaining tumour; 3, 10-50 per cent remaining tumour) and non-responders (score 4, more than 50 per cent viable tumour; 5, no response) were compared in survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Among 377 patients, 256 had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 68 of 256 patients (26·6 per cent) had a lymph node response and 115 (44·9 per cent) did not. The remaining 73 patients (28·5 per cent) had negative lymph nodes with no evidence of regression. Some patients had a lymph node response in the absence of a response in the primary tumour (27 of 99, 27 per cent). Lymph node responders had a significant survival benefit (P < 0·001), even when stratified by patients with or without a response in the primary tumour. On multivariable analysis, lymph node responders had decreased overall (hazard ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·78) and disease-specific (HR 0·42, 0·27 to 0·66) mortality, and experienced reduced local and systemic recurrence. CONCLUSION Lymph node regression is a strong prognostic factor and may be more important than response in the primary tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Myoteri
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
| | - W Wulaningsih
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Oncology, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Cunningham
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Green
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zheng J, Xie SH, Santoni G, Lagergren J. Population-based cohort study of diabetes mellitus and mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1799-1806. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Gastric adenocarcinoma is a common cause of cancer death globally. It remains unclear whether coexisting diabetes mellitus influences survival in patients with this tumour. A cohort study was conducted to determine whether coexisting diabetes increases mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma.
Methods
This nationwide population-based cohort study included all patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma in Sweden between 1990 and 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing risks regression were used to assess the influence of coexisting diabetes on disease-specific mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma with adjustment for sex, age, calendar year and co-morbidity (Charlson Co-morbidity Index score excluding diabetes).
Results
Among 23 591 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, 2806 (11·9 per cent) had coexisting diabetes. Overall, patients with diabetes had a moderately increased risk of disease-specific mortality after diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma compared with those without diabetes, as shown by both Cox regression (hazard ratio (HR) 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·11 to 1·22) and competing risks regression (sub-HR 1·08, 1·02 to 1·13). The HRs for disease-specific mortality were notably increased in diabetic patients without other co-morbidity (HR 1·23, 1·15 to 1·32) and in diabetic patients who had surgery with curative intent (HR 1·27, 1·16 to 1·38).
Conclusion
These findings indicate a worse prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and coexisting diabetes compared with those without diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Zheng
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S-H Xie
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Santoni
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mackenzie H, Markar SR, Askari A, Faiz O, Hull M, Purkayastha S, Møller H, Lagergren J. Obesity surgery and risk of cancer. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1650-1657. [PMID: 30003539 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity increases the risk of several types of cancer. Whether bariatric surgery influences the risk of obesity-related cancer is not clear. This study aimed to uncover the risk of hormone-related (breast, endometrial and prostate), colorectal and oesophageal cancers following obesity surgery. METHODS This national population-based cohort study used data from the Hospital Episode Statistics database in England collected between 1997 and 2012. Propensity matching on sex, age, co-morbidity and duration of follow-up was used to compare cancer risk among obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery (gastric bypass, gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy) and obese individuals not undergoing such surgery. Conditional logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals. RESULTS In the study period, from a cohort of 716 960 patients diagnosed with obesity, 8794 patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched exactly with 8794 obese patients who did not have surgery. Compared with the no-surgery group, patients who had bariatric surgery exhibited a decreased risk of hormone-related cancers (OR 0·23, 95 per cent c.i. 0·18 to 0·30). This decrease was consistent for breast (OR 0·25, 0·19 to 0·33), endometrium (OR 0·21, 0·13 to 0·35) and prostate (OR 0·37, 0·17 to 0·76) cancer. Gastric bypass resulted in the largest risk reduction for hormone-related cancers (OR 0·16, 0·11 to 0·24). Gastric bypass, but not gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy, was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR 2·63, 1·17 to 5·95). Longer follow-up after bariatric surgery strengthened these diverging associations. CONCLUSION Bariatric surgery is associated with decreased risk of hormone-related cancers, whereas gastric bypass might increase the risk of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Mackenzie
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Askari
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - O Faiz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK
| | - M Hull
- Section of Molecular Gastroenterology, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - S Purkayastha
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - H Møller
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Markar SR, Johar A, Maisey N, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Complications during neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis following surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31:4774516. [PMID: 29293984 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Previous researchers have focused upon the influence of postoperative complications upon prognosis from esophagectomy, with very little attention paid to the potential negative effects of complications during neoadjuvant therapy. The hypothesis under investigation in this study was that the prognosis after esophageal cancer surgery is negatively influenced by complications causing hospital admission during neoadjuvant therapy. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for esophageal cancer between 1987 and 2010 were identified from a population-based nationwide Swedish cohort study and followed up until 2016. The association between hematological and nonhematological complications during neoadjuvant therapy and risk of short- and long-term mortality following surgery was analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs were adjusted for appropriate confounding variables.Among 587 patients, complications during neoadjuvant therapy requiring emergency hospitalization affected 65 (12%) patients. Hematological complications were associated with an increased 90-day overall mortality (HR = 5.60; 95% CI 1.27-24.75), particularly in subgroups of patients of tumor stage 0-II, adenocarcinoma, and radical and nonradical resection margins, and rendered increased 5-year disease-specific mortality specifically for esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.00-10.40). Occurrence of nonhematological complications was followed by an increase in 5-year mortality (HR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.15-4.81) in poor prognostic groups (tumor stage III-IV). There was no increased 5-year mortality following hematological or nonhematological complications in other subgroups of patients. Complications during neoadjuvant therapy may adversely impact short and long-term mortality in subgroups of patients with esophageal cancer receiving esophagectomy. Patient selection, optimization of neoadjuvant therapy, and timing of surgical resection, remain important areas for future development in the management of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Markar
- Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London
| | - A Johar
- Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Trust
| | - P Lagergren
- Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Cancer studies, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Davies AR, Zylstra J, Baker CR, Gossage JA, Dellaportas D, Lagergren J, Findlay JM, Puccetti F, El Lakis M, Drummond RJ, Dutta S, Mera A, Van Hemelrijck M, Forshaw MJ, Maynard ND, Allum WH, Low D, Mason RC. A comparison of the left thoracoabdominal and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31:4566196. [PMID: 29087474 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes of a large multicenter series of left thoracoabdominal esophagectomies, and compare these to the more widely utilized Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. With ethics approval and an established study protocol, anonymized data from five centers were merged into a structured database. The study exposure was operative approach (ILE or LTE). The primary outcome measure was time to death. Secondary outcome measures included time to tumor recurrence, positive surgical resection margins, lymph node yield, postoperative death, and hospital length of stay. Cox proportional hazards models provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for age, pathological tumor stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and neoadjuvant treatment. Among 1228 patients (598 ILE; 630 LTE), most (86%) had adenocarcinoma (AC) and were male (81%). Comparing ILE and LTE for AC patients, no difference was seen in terms of time to death (HR 0.904 95%CI 0.749-1.1090) or time to recurrence (HR 0.973 95%CI 0.768-1.232). The risk of a positive resection margin was also similar (OR 1.022 95%CI 0.731-1.429). Median lymph node yield did not differ between approaches (LTE 21; ILE 21; P = 0.426). In-hospital mortality was 2.4%, significantly lower in the LTE group (LTE 1.3%; ILE 3.6%; P = 0.004). Median hospital stay was 11 days in the LTE group and 14 days in the ILE group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this is the largest series of left thoracoabdominal esophagectomies to be submitted for publication and the only one to compare two different transthoracic esophagectomy strategies. It demonstrates oncological equivalence between operative approaches but possible short- term advantages to the left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Dellaportas
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J M Findlay
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford Esophago-Gastric Centre, Oxford University Hospitals.,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford
| | - F Puccetti
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - M El Lakis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Centre, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - R J Drummond
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Dutta
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Mera
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London
| | - M J Forshaw
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - N D Maynard
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford Esophago-Gastric Centre, Oxford University Hospitals
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - D Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Centre, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - R C Mason
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kauppila JH, Johar A, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Zylstra J, Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Health-related quality of life after open transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2018; 105:230-236. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer have similar survival rates. Whether these approaches differ in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is uncertain and was examined in this study.
Methods
Patients undergoing transhiatal or transthoracic surgery for lower-third oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer between 2011 and 2015 were selected from an institutional database. HRQoL outcomes were measured at 6 and 12 months after surgery using validated written questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25). Linear mixed models provided mean score differences (MSDs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals, adjusted for preoperative HRQoL, age, physical status (ASA fitness grade), tumour location, tumour stage, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy and postoperative complications. MSD values of 10 or more were regarded as clinically relevant.
Results
Some 146 patients underwent transhiatal (86, 58·9 per cent) or transthoracic (60, 41·1 per cent) oesophagectomy. The HRQoL questionnaires were returned by 111 patients at 6 months and 74 at 12 months. At 6 months, transthoracic oesophagectomy was associated with worse role function (MSD –12, 95 per cent c.i. –23 to 0; P = 0·046). At 12 months, patients in the transthoracic group had more nausea and vomiting (MSD 11, 0 to 22; P = 0·045), dyspnoea (MSD 13, 1 to 25; P = 0·029) and constipation (MSD 20, 7 to 33; P = 0·003) than those in the transhiatal group.
Conclusion
Transhiatal oesophagectomy seems to offer better HRQoL than transthoracic oesophagectomy 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Kauppila
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Centre, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - A Johar
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - A R Davies
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - P Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lagergren J, Mattsson F, Lagergren P. Weekday of cancer surgery in relation to prognosis. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1735-1743. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Later weekday of surgery seems to affect the prognosis adversely in oesophageal cancer, whereas any such influence on other cancer sites is unknown. This study aimed to test whether weekday of surgery influenced prognosis following commonly performed cancer operations.
Methods
This nationwide Swedish population-based cohort study from 1997 to 2014 analysed weekday of elective surgery for ten major cancers in relation to disease-specific and all-cause mortality. Cox regression provided hazard ratios with 95 per cent confidence intervals, adjusted for the co-variables age, sex, co-morbidity, hospital volume, calendar year and tumour stage.
Results
A total of 228 927 patients were included. Later weekday of surgery (Thursdays and, even more so, Fridays) was associated with increased mortality rates for gastrointestinal cancers. Adjusted hazard ratios for disease-specific mortality, comparing surgery on Friday with that on Monday, were 1·57 (95 per cent c.i. 1·31 to 1·88) for oesophagogastric cancer, 1·49 (1·17 to 1·88) for liver/pancreatic/biliary cancer and 1·53 (1·44 to 1·63) for colorectal cancer. Excluding mortality during the initial 90 days of surgery made little difference to these findings, and all-cause mortality was similar to disease-specific mortality. The associations were similar in analyses stratified for co-variables. No consistent associations were found between weekday of surgery and prognosis for cancer of the head and neck, lung, thyroid, breast, kidney/bladder, prostate or ovary/uterus.
Conclusion
Later weekday of surgery (Thursday or Friday) seems to influence the prognosis adversely for cancers of the gastrointestinal tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| | - F Mattsson
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hynes O, Anandavadivelan P, Gossage J, Johar A, Lagergren J, Lagergren P. The impact of pre- and post-operative weight loss and body mass index on prognosis in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:1559-1565. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
28
|
Ullah I, Muralidharan KG, Alkodsi A, Kjällquist U, Stålhammar G, Lövrot J, Martinez NF, Lagergren J, Hautaniemi S, Hartman J, Bergh J. Abstract P6-01-04: Evolutionary analyses of matched primary and metastatic breast cancer reveal both linear and parallel progression with lack of axillary lymph node involvement. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p6-01-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ullah
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - KG Muralidharan
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Alkodsi
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - U Kjällquist
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Stålhammar
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lövrot
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - NF Martinez
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Hautaniemi
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Hartman
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Bergh
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Markar S, Wiggins T, Antonowicz S, Lagergren J, Mughal M, Hanna G. Breath volatile organic compound analysis for the diagnosis of oesophago-gastric cancer; multi-centre blinded validation clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(17)30095-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
30
|
Hellstadius Y, Lagergren J, Zylstra J, Gossage J, Davies A, Hultman CM, Lagergren P, Wikman A. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression among esophageal cancer patients prior to surgery. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:1128-1134. [PMID: 26542282 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to establish the prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression among esophageal cancer patients, post-diagnosis but prior to curatively intended surgery. This was a cross-sectional study using data from a hospital-based prospective cohort study, carried out at St Thomas' Hospital, London. Potential predictor variables were retrieved from medical charts and self-report questionnaires. Anxiety and depression were measured prior to esophageal cancer surgery, using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Prevalence of anxiety and depression was calculated using the established cutoff (scores ≥8 on each subscale) indicating cases of 'possible-probable' anxiety or depression, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine predictors of emotional distress. Among the 106 included patients, 36 (34%) scored above the cutoff (≥8) for anxiety and 24 (23%) for depression. Women were more likely to report anxiety than men (odds ratio 4.04, 95% confidence interval 1.45-11.16), and patients reporting limitations in their activity status had more than five times greater odds of reporting depression (odds ratio 6.07, 95% confidence interval 1.53-24.10). A substantial proportion of esophageal cancer patients report anxiety and/or depression prior to surgery, particularly women and those with limited activity status, which highlights a need for qualified emotional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Hellstadius
- Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Section of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Section of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Gossage
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Section of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Davies
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Section of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C M Hultman
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Section of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Wikman
- Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Frisell A, Lagergren J, de Boniface J. National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1640-1648. [PMID: 27550796 PMCID: PMC5095775 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Reconstructive alternatives should be discussed with women facing mastectomy for breast cancer. These include immediate and delayed reconstruction, which both have inherent advantages and disadvantages. Immediate reconstruction rates vary considerably in Swedish healthcare regions, and the aim of the study was to analyse reasons for this disparity. Methods All women who underwent mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Registry and from questionnaires regarding patient information and involvement in preoperative decision‐making sent to women who were still alive in 2015. Results Of 2929 women who had undergone 2996 mastectomies, 2906 were still alive. The questionnaire response rate was 76·3 per cent. Immediate reconstruction rates varied regionally, between 3·0 and 26·4 per cent. Tumour characteristics impacted on reconstruction rates but did not explain regional differences. Patient participation in decision‐making, availability of plastic surgery services and patient information, however, were independent predictors of immediate breast reconstruction, and varied significantly between regions. Even in younger patients with low‐risk tumours, rates of patient information ranged between 34·3 and 83·3 per cent. Conclusion Significant regional differences in immediate reconstruction rates were not explained by differences in tumour characteristics, but by disparities in patient information, availability of plastic surgery services and involvement in decision‐making. Information is key
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Frisell
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J de Boniface
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Markar S, Wahlin K, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. University hospital status and prognosis following surgery for esophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1191-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Revised: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
33
|
Maret-Ouda J, Yanes M, Konings P, Brusselaers N, Lagergren J. Mortality from laparoscopic antireflux surgery in a nationwide cohort of the working-age population. Br J Surg 2016; 103:863-70. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Revised: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Both medication and surgery are effective treatments for severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Postoperative risks have contributed to decreased use of antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to assess short-term mortality following primary laparoscopic fundoplication.
Methods
This was a population-based nationwide cohort study including all Swedish hospitals that performed laparoscopic fundoplication between 1997 and 2013. All patients aged 18–65 years with GORD who underwent primary laparoscopic fundoplication during the study interval were included. The primary outcome was absolute all-cause and surgery-related 90- and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were reoperation and length of hospital stay. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios with 95 per cent confidence intervals of reoperation within 90 days and prolonged hospital stay (4 days or more).
Results
Of 8947 included patients, 5306 (59·3 per cent) were men and 551 (6·2 per cent) had significant co-morbidity (Charlson score above 0). Median age at surgery was 48 years, and median hospital stay was 2 days. The annual rate of laparoscopic fundoplication decreased from 15·3 to 2·4 patients per 100 000 population during the study period, whereas the proportion of patients with co-morbidity increased more than twofold. All-cause 90- and 30-day mortality rates were 0·08 per cent (7 patients) and 0·03 per cent (3 patients) respectively. Only one death (0·01 per cent) was directly surgery-related. The 90-day reoperation rate was 0·4 per cent (39 patients). Co-morbidity and older age were associated with an increased risk of prolonged hospital stay, but not reoperation.
Conclusion
This population-based study revealed very low mortality and reoperation rates following primary laparoscopic fundoplication in the working-age population. The findings may influence clinical decision-making in the treatment of severe GORD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Maret-Ouda
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Yanes
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Konings
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Brusselaers
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Section of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lagergren K, Lagergren J, Brusselaers N. Hormone Replacement Therapy and Oral Contraceptives and Risk of Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv096.287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
35
|
Lindam A, Ness-Jensen E, Jansson C, Nordenstedt H, Hveem K, Lagergren J. The Bidirectional Association between Insomnia and Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms, the HUNT Study, Norway. Int J Epidemiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv096.336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
36
|
Ljung R, Mattsson F, Lagergren K, Jokinen J, Lagergren J. Suicide Attempt and Future Risk of Cancer—A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv097.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
37
|
Backemar L, Lagergren P, Johar A, Lagergren J. Impact of co-morbidity on mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2015; 102:1097-105. [PMID: 26059747 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Revised: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited knowledge of how co-morbidities influence survival after surgery for oesophageal cancer. This population-based cohort study investigated how Charlson co-morbidity index and specific co-morbidities influenced all-cause and disease-specific mortality. METHODS Data from all patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden in 1987-2010, with follow-up until 2012, came from histopathology records, operation charts and nationwide registers. Associations between co-morbidities (Charlson co-morbidity index) and mortality were analysed using Cox proportional hazard regression with adjustment for potential confounding, and presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95 per cent c.i. RESULTS Among 1822 patients there were 1474 deaths (80.9 per cent), of which 1139 (77.3 per cent) occurred between 91 days and 5 years after surgery. Overall all-cause mortality was increased in patients with a Charlson score of 2 or more (HR 1.24, 95 per cent c.i. 1.08 to 1.42), and those with a history of myocardial infarction (HR 1.23, 1.01 to 1.49) or congestive heart failure (HR 1.31, 1.04 to 1.67). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma had increased overall all-cause mortality if they had been diagnosed with cerebrovascular disease (HR 1.35, 1.00 to 1.83) or other cancers (HR 1.36, 1.09 to 1.71), whereas those with adenocarcinoma did not. A Charlson score of 1 or exposure to the co-morbidity groups peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, connective tissue disease, peptic ulcer disease, diabetes and liver disease did not increase mortality. The disease-specific results were generally similar to the all-cause mortality data. CONCLUSION Co-morbidity with a Charlson score of 2 or more, previous myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure were associated with increased mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery undertaken with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Backemar
- Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Davies AR, Sandhu H, Pillai A, Sinha P, Mattsson F, Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Allum WH, Mason RC. Surgical resection strategy and the influence of radicality on outcomes in oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2014; 101:511-7. [PMID: 24615656 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal surgical approach to tumours of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction remains controversial. The principal randomized trial comparing transhiatal (THO) and transthoracic (TTO) oesophagectomy showed no survival difference, but suggested that some subgroups of patients may benefit from the more extended lymphadenectomy typically conducted with TTO. METHODS This was a cohort study based on two prospectively created databases. Short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing THO and TTO were compared. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, with secondary outcomes including time to recurrence and patterns of disease relapse. A Cox proportional hazards model provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.), with adjustments for age, tumour stage, tumour grade, response to chemotherapy and lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS Of 664 included patients (263 THO, 401 TTO), the distributions of age, sex and histological subtype were similar between the groups. In-hospital mortality (1·1 versus 3·2 per cent for THO and TTO respectively; P = 0·110) and in-hospital stay (14 versus 17 days respectively; P < 0·001) favoured THO. In the adjusted model, there was no difference in overall survival (HR 1·07, 95 per cent c.i. 0·84 to 1·36) or time to tumour recurrence (HR 0·99, 0·76 to 1·29) between the two operations. Local tumour recurrence patterns were similar (22·8 versus 24·4 per cent for THO and TTO respectively). No subgroup could be identified of patients who had benefited from more radical surgery on the basis of tumour location or stage. CONCLUSION There was no difference in survival or tumour recurrence for TTO and THO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, King's College London, London, UK; Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK; Unit of Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sjostrand J, Tofigh A, Daubin V, Arvestad L, Sennblad B, Lagergren J. A Bayesian Method for Analyzing Lateral Gene Transfer. Syst Biol 2014; 63:409-20. [DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
40
|
van der Schaaf M, Johar A, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Gossage J, Mason R, Lagergren J. Surgical Prevention of Reflux after Esophagectomy for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:3655-61. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3041-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
41
|
Yip CSP, Davnall F, Kozarski R, Landau D, Mason R, Lagergren J, Cook G, Goh V. CT Tumoral Heterogeneity as a Prognostic Marker in Primary Esophageal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2013; 3:S3. [PMID: 24674540 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C S P Yip
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - F Davnall
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Kozarski
- University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - D Landau
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Mason
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Lagergren
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - G Cook
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Goh
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Coupland VH, Lagergren J, Konfortion J, Allum W, Mendall MA, Hardwick RH, Linklater KM, Møller H, Jack RH. Ethnicity in relation to incidence of oesophageal and gastric cancer in England. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:1908-14. [PMID: 23059745 PMCID: PMC3504951 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/04/2012] [Accepted: 09/18/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the variation in incidence of all, and six subgroups of, oesophageal and gastric cancer between ethnic groups. METHODS Data on all oesophageal and gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2007 in England were analysed. Self-assigned ethnicity from the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset was used. Male and female age-standardised incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for each ethnic group, using White groups as the references. RESULTS Ethnicity information was available for 83% of patients (76 130/92 205). White men had a higher incidence of oesophageal cancer, with IRR for the other ethnic groups ranging from 0.17 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.15-0.20) (Pakistani men) to 0.58 95% CI (0.50-0.67) (Black Caribbean men). Compared with White women, Bangladeshi women (IRR 2.02 (1.24-3.29)) had a higher incidence of oesophageal cancer. For gastric cancer, Black Caribbean men (1.39 (1.22-1.60)) and women (1.57 (1.28-1.92)) had a higher incidence compared with their White counterparts. In the subgroup analysis, White men had a higher incidence of lower oesophageal and gastric cardia cancer compared with the other ethnic groups studied. Bangladeshi women (3.10 (1.60-6.00)) had a higher incidence of upper and middle oesophageal cancer compared with White women. CONCLUSION Substantial ethnic differences in the incidence of oesophageal and gastric cancer were found. Further research into differences in exposures to risk factors between ethnic groups could elucidate why the observed variation in incidence exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V H Coupland
- King's College London, Thames Cancer Registry, 1st Floor Capital House, 42, Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Anderin C, Martling A, Lagergren J, Ljung A, Holm T. Short-term outcome after gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14:1060-4. [PMID: 21981319 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02848.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (APE) of the rectum has been introduced with the aim of improving the oncological outcome of low rectal cancer. The procedure includes resection of the levator muscles en bloc with the mesorectum, leaving a larger perineal defect than after conventional APE. This study reports short-term outcome of gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction on perineal wound healing. METHOD Sixty-five patients were studied after extra-levator APE and a one-sided myocutaneous flap for a low or locally recurrent rectal cancer at the Karolinska University Hospital from January 2002 to December 2008. Fifty-nine had received neoadjuvant radio- or radiochemotherapy. All perineal complications occurring within 30 days after surgery were registered. In addition, the status of the perineal reconstruction at 6 months and 1 year after surgery was assessed based on medical records from outpatient visits. RESULTS Twenty-seven (41.5%) patients had one or more perineal wound complications. A minor wound infection occurred in 15, while 12 had either a more severe infection with dehiscence or a pelvic abscess. The reconstruction was completely healed in 91% of the patients at 1 year. CONCLUSION Although the vast majority of the perineal reconstructions were healed at 1 year, the short-term perineal wound complication rate of gluteus maximus flap reconstruction was high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Anderin
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of sex hormonal influence in explaining the strong male predominance in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) needs attention. METHODS A nation-wide nested case-control study was initiated from the Swedish Multi-Generation Register with subjects born since 1932. The study exposures were the number of children and age at having the first child. Cases of EA, gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma (EJA), and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were identified. Ten age- and sex-matched controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS In women, 115 EA, 246 EJA, and 363 SCC were identified. Comparing parous with non-parous women, a decreased risk of EA was indicated (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.14), which became statistically significant when EA and EJA were combined (OR=0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.99). All these associations were, however, at least as strong in men. Age at first birth did not show significant risk in women, but showed risk in men. In addition, the results were similar for SCC in both sexes. CONCLUSION These findings indicate that associations between the reproductive factors parity and age at first birth, and risk of EA might not be explained by sex hormonal influence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Lu
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rutegård M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Mason R, Lagergren J. Surgical complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012; 38:555-61. [PMID: 22483704 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.02.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2011] [Revised: 02/08/2012] [Accepted: 02/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Acute surgical complications after esophageal resection for cancer may decrease the long-term survival. Previous results on this topic are conflicting and no population-based studies are available. METHODS A prospective, nationwide Swedish study was conducted in 2001-2010. Eligible patients comprised those afflicted by esophageal or cardia cancer and underwent surgical resection in Sweden in 2001-2005. Details concerning patient and tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, and postoperative surgical complications were collected prospectively. Follow-up for mortality, starting from 90 days after the surgery, was done until May 2010. Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, tumor stage, sex, histology, comorbidity, surgical approach and surgical radicality. RESULTS Among 567 included patients who survived at least 90 days postoperatively, 130 (22.9%) sustained a predefined surgical complication within 30 days of surgery. The adjusted HR of mortality was increased in patients who sustained surgical complications, compared to patients without such complications (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.63). CONCLUSIONS The occurrence of surgical complications might be an independent predictor for poorer long-term survival in patients resected for esophageal cancer, even in patients who survived the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rutegård
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Plecka Östlund M, Wenger U, Mattsson F, Ebrahim F, Botha A, Lagergren J. Population-based study of the need for cholecystectomy after obesity surgery. Br J Surg 2012; 99:864-9. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Weight loss following obesity surgery is associated with gallstone formation, but there is limited evidence on whether prophylactic cholecystectomy is indicated during obesity surgery. The aim of this study was to clarify the need for cholecystectomy following obesity surgery.
Methods
A Swedish nationwide, population-based cohort study was conducted during the 22-year interval 1987–2008. Need for later cholecystectomy for gallstone disease was assessed in patients who had undergone obesity surgery in comparison with the general population of corresponding age, sex and calendar year. This need was also compared with the need for cholecystectomy in cohorts of patients who had undergone antireflux surgery and appendicectomy. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) were calculated to estimate the relative risk.
Results
In the obesity surgery cohort of 13 443 patients, the observed number of cholecystectomies (1149, 8·5 per cent) exceeded the expected number by over fivefold (SIR 5·5, 95 per cent c.i. 5·1 to 5·8). The observed need for imperative cholecystectomy (for cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, or jaundice; 427, 3·2 per cent) was also greater than expected (SIR 5·2, 4·7 to 5·7). The SIR peaked 7–24 months after obesity surgery and decreased with longer follow-up. The SIRs for cholecystectomy after antireflux surgery and appendicectomy were 2·4 (2·2 to 2·6) and 1·7 (1·6 to 1·7) respectively.
Conclusion
An increased need for cholecystectomy after obesity surgery was confirmed, but was probably partly due to an increased detection of gallbladder disease only because of the surgery; the individual's risk of imperative cholecystectomy was low. Therefore, prophylactic cholecystectomy might not be recommended during obesity surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Plecka Östlund
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - U Wenger
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Mattsson
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Ebrahim
- National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Botha
- Department of General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinomas are highly lethal tumours of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary tract. The aetiology is largely unknown, and the potential roles of gallstones and gall bladder removal (cholecystectomy) need to be addressed in a large study with a long follow-up. METHODS A population-based nationwide Swedish cohort study was carried out, in which patients hospitalised for gallstone diagnosis with or without gallbladder removal (cholecystectomy) between 1965 and 2008 were identified in the Swedish Patient Registry. The cohort was followed up for cancer in the Swedish Cancer Registry. The observed numbers of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas that developed after one year of follow-up were compared with the expected numbers, calculated from the corresponding background population, and the relative risks were estimated by standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Among the 192,960 non-cholecystectomised individuals with gallstones, there was a more than two-fold overall increased risk of both intra- and extra- hepatic cholangiocarcinomas, which remained stable over the follow-up period (SIR 2.77, 95% CI 2.17-3.49, and SIR 2.58, 95% CI 2.21-3.00, respectively). In the cholecystectomy cohort, including 345,251 people and 4,854,969 person-years, 325 incident cholangiocarcinomas were identified, of which 98 (30%) were intrahepatic and 227 (70%) were extrahepatic. Initially (1-4 years after surgery), the risk was increased for both intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SIR 1.80, 95% CI 1.19-2.62) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SIR 2.29, 95% CI 1.83-2.82), but no increase remained after 10 years of follow-up or more (SIR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79-1.48, and SIR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70-1.07, respectively). INTERPRETATION Gallstones seem to increase the risk of both intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. However, this risk seems to decline to the level of the background population with time after cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Nordenstedt
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
van der Schaaf M, Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Persisting symptoms after intrathoracic anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2011; 99:95-9. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Intrathoracic anastomotic leak is a major cause of postoperative mortality and morbidity after resection for oesophageal cancer. Little is known about persisting symptoms after this complication. In this Swedish nationwide cohort study, it was hypothesized that intrathoracic anastomotic leak makes patients more susceptible to persisting eating difficulties, odynophagia, dysphagia, trouble swallowing saliva and reflux.
Methods
Patients who underwent oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer, and had reconstruction with a gastric conduit and an intrathoracic anastomosis, between April 2001 and December 2005 were included. Symptoms were measured using an oesophageal cancer-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ-OES18), developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate risk estimates for symptoms, expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95 per cent confidence interval, 6 months after intrathoracic anastomotic leakage.
Results
Among the 277 patients included in the study, the 29 patients with an intrathoracic anastomotic leak had a fourfold increased risk (OR 4·05, 1·47 to 11·16) of eating difficulties and a more than twofold greater risk (OR 2·59, 1·15 to 5·82) of odynophagia, 6 months after surgery, compared with patients without a leak. There was a twofold increased risk of trouble swallowing, but this was not statistically significant (OR 1·98, 0·58 to 6·67).
Conclusion
Patients with an intrathoracic anastomotic leak after oesophageal cancer surgery were at increased risk of eating difficulties and odynophagia 6 months after surgery. Higher risks of reflux and dysphagia were not found among patients with anastomotic leak. Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M van der Schaaf
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shore R, Ljung R, Mattsson F, Lagergren J, Lindblad M. 6565 POSTER Androgens in the Etiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma – a Population-based Cohort Study on Prostate Cancer Patients in Sweden 1961 to 2008. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71876-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
50
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to an increased risk of oesophageal bile exposure after cholecystectomy, an association with oesophageal adenocarcinoma is possible. There are some data in support of this hypothesis, and the aim of this study was to ascertain whether the association could be confirmed. METHODS A population-based cohort study was undertaken to compare the number of cases of oesophageal adenocarcinoma observed in a cohort of patients who have had a cholecystectomy in Sweden during 1965-2008 with the expected number, calculated from the entire Swedish population of corresponding age, sex and year. The risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma was assessed by calculating the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals. RESULTS The cholecystectomy cohort included 345 251 patients who were followed up for a mean of 15 years and contributed 4 854 969 person-years at risk. The total of 126 new cases of oesophageal adenocarcinoma was greater than expected (SIR 1.29, 1.07 to 1.53). The strength of the association between cholecystectomy and oesophageal adenocarcinoma tended to increase with longer follow-up after cholecystectomy. There was no association between cholecystectomy and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SIR 0.93, 0.81 to 1.08), and in an unoperated cohort of 192 960 patients with gallstones no increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma was identified (SIR 0.99, 0.71 to 1.35). CONCLUSION Cholecystectomy appears to be linked to an increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, but the absolute risk is small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|