1
|
Hanna GK, Madany M, Tay ASMS, Edwards LA, Kim S, Michael JS, Nuno M, Thomas T, Li A, Berel D, Black KL, Fan X, Zhang W, Rudnick JD, Wang R, Yu JS. ZEB1 loss increases glioma stem cell tumorigenicity and resistance to chemoradiation. J Neurosurg 2022; 138:1313-1324. [PMID: 36115050 DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.jns22259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma has been known to be resistant to chemotherapy and radiation, whereas the underlying mechanisms of resistance have not been fully elucidated. The authors studied the role of the transcription factor ZEB1 (zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 protein), which is associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is central to the stemness of glioblastoma, to determine its role in therapeutic resistance to radiation and chemotherapy. The authors previously demonstrated that ZEB1 is deleted in a majority of glioblastomas. METHODS The authors explored resistance to therapy in the context of ZEB1 loss and overexpression in glioma stem cells (GSCs) and in patient data. RESULTS Patients with ZEB1 loss had a shorter survival time than patients with wild-type ZEB1 in both the high- and low-MGMT groups. Consistent with the clinical data, mice implanted with ZEB1 knockdown GSCs showed shortened survival compared with mice inoculated with nonsilencing control (NS) short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) GSC glioblastoma. ZEB1-deleted GSCs demonstrated increased tumorigenicity with regard to proliferation and invasion. Importantly, GSCs that lose ZEB1 expression develop enhanced resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined chemoradiation. ZEB1 loss may lead to increased HER3 expression through the HER3/Akt pathway associated with this chemoresistance. Conversely, overexpression of ZEB1 in GSCs that are ZEB1 null leads to increased sensitivity to chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS The study results indicate that ZEB1 loss in cancer stem cells confers resistance to chemoradiation and uncovers a potentially targetable cell surface receptor in these resistant cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Miriam Nuno
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,3Department of Biostatics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | | | - Aiguo Li
- 4Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; and
| | | | | | - Xuemo Fan
- 5Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Wei Zhang
- 4Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; and
| | - Jeremy D Rudnick
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,6Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Rongfu Wang
- 7USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu JL, Omofoye OA, Rudnick JD, Kim S, Tighiouart M, Phuphanich S, Wang H, Mazer M, Ganaway T, Chu RM, Patil CG, Black KL, Shiao SL, Wang RF, Yu JS. A Phase I Study of Autologous Dendritic Cell Vaccine Pulsed with Allogeneic Stem-like Cell Line Lysate in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 28:689-696. [PMID: 34862245 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is a heterogeneous malignancy with multiple subpopulations of cancer cells present within any tumor. We present the results of a phase 1 clinical trial utilizing an autologous dendritic cell vaccine pulsed with lysate derived from a glioblastoma stem-like cell line. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma were enrolled as separate cohorts. Eligibility criteria included a qualifying surgical resection or minimal tumor size, less than or equal to 4 mg dexamethasone daily dose, and Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 70. Vaccine treatment consisted of two phases: An induction phase with vaccine given weekly for 4 weeks, and a maintenance phase with vaccines administered every 8 weeks until depletion of supply or disease progression. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma also received standard-of-care radiation and temozolomide. The primary objective for this open-label, single-institution trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of the autologous dendritic cell vaccine. RESULTS For the 11 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, median PFS was 8.75 months, and median OS was 20.36 months. For the 25 patients with recurrent glioblastoma, median PFS was 3.23 months, 6-month PFS was 24%, and median survival was 11.97 months. A subset of patients developed a cytotoxic T cell response as determined by an IFNγ ELISpot assay. CONCLUSIONS In this trial, treatment of newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma with autologous dendritic cell vaccine pulsed with lysate derived from an allogeneic stem-like cell line was safe and well-tolerated. Clinical outcomes add to the body of evidence suggesting that immunotherapy plays a role in the treatment of glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jethro L Hu
- Department of Neurology and the Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
| | | | | | - Sungjin Kim
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
| | | | | | | | - Mia Mazer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
| | | | - Ray M Chu
- Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
| | | | | | | | - Rong-Fu Wang
- Department of Medicine, University of Southern California
| | - John S Yu
- Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sun T, Patil R, Galstyan A, Klymyshyn D, Ding H, Chesnokova A, Cavenee WK, Furnari FB, Ljubimov VA, Shatalova ES, Wagner S, Li D, Mamelak AN, Bannykh SI, Patil CG, Rudnick JD, Hu J, Grodzinski ZB, Rekechenetskiy A, Falahatian V, Lyubimov AV, Chen YL, Leoh LS, Daniels-Wells TR, Penichet ML, Holler E, Ljubimov AV, Black KL, Ljubimova JY. Blockade of a Laminin-411-Notch Axis with CRISPR/Cas9 or a Nanobioconjugate Inhibits Glioblastoma Growth through Tumor-Microenvironment Cross-talk. Cancer Res 2019; 79:1239-1251. [PMID: 30659021 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
There is an unmet need for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The extracellular matrix, including laminins, in the tumor microenvironment is important for tumor invasion and progression. In a panel of 226 patient brain glioma samples, we found a clinical correlation between the expression of tumor vascular laminin-411 (α4β1γ1) with higher tumor grade and with expression of cancer stem cell (CSC) markers, including Notch pathway members, CD133, Nestin, and c-Myc. Laminin-411 overexpression also correlated with higher recurrence rate and shorter survival of GBM patients. We also showed that depletion of laminin-411 α4 and β1 chains with CRISPR/Cas9 in human GBM cells led to reduced growth of resultant intracranial tumors in mice and significantly increased survival of host animals compared with mice with untreated cells. Inhibition of laminin-411 suppressed Notch pathway in normal and malignant human brain cell types. A nanobioconjugate potentially suitable for clinical use and capable of crossing blood-brain barrier was designed to block laminin-411 expression. Nanobioconjugate treatment of mice carrying intracranial GBM significantly increased animal survival and inhibited multiple CSC markers, including the Notch axis. This study describes an efficient strategy for GBM treatment via targeting a critical component of the tumor microenvironment largely independent of heterogeneous genetic mutations in glioblastoma.Significance: Laminin-411 expression in the glioma microenvironment correlates with Notch and other cancer stem cell markers and can be targeted by a novel, clinically translatable nanobioconjugate to inhibit glioma growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Sun
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rameshwar Patil
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anna Galstyan
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Dmytro Klymyshyn
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hui Ding
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alexandra Chesnokova
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Webster K Cavenee
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Frank B Furnari
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Vladimir A Ljubimov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ekaterina S Shatalova
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shawn Wagner
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Debiao Li
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Adam N Mamelak
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Serguei I Bannykh
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Chirag G Patil
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremy D Rudnick
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jethro Hu
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zachary B Grodzinski
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Vida Falahatian
- Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Clinical Research Training Program (CRTP), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alexander V Lyubimov
- Toxicology Research Laboratory (TRL), Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Yongmei L Chen
- Toxicology Research Laboratory (TRL), Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lai S Leoh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tracy R Daniels-Wells
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Manuel L Penichet
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Molecular Biology Institute, AIDS Institute, the California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eggehard Holler
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Institut für Biophysik und Physikalische Biochemie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alexander V Ljubimov
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Keith L Black
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Julia Y Ljubimova
- Nanomedicine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. .,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saria MG, Corle C, Hu J, Rudnick JD, Phuphanich S, Mrugala MM, Crew LK, Bota DA, Dan Fu B, Kim RY, Brown T, Feely H, Brechlin J, Brown BD, Drappatz J, Wen PY, Chen CC, Carter B, Lee JW, Kesari S. Retrospective analysis of the tolerability and activity of lacosamide in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 2013; 118:1183-7. [DOI: 10.3171/2013.1.jns12397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
The object of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity of lacosamide in patients with brain tumors.
Methods
The authors reviewed the medical records at 5 US academic medical centers with tertiary brain tumor programs, seeking all patients in whom a primary brain tumor had been diagnosed and who were taking lacosamide.
Results
The authors identified 70 patients with primary brain tumors and reviewed seizure frequency and toxicities. The majority of the patients had gliomas (96%). Fifty-five (78%) had partial seizures only, and 12 (17%) had generalized seizures. Most of the patients (74%) were started on lacosamide because of recurrent seizures. Forty-six patients (66%) reported a decrease in seizure frequency, and 21 patients (30%) reported stable seizures. Most of the patients (54 [77%]) placed on lacosamide did not report any toxicities.
Conclusions
This retrospective analysis demonstrated that lacosamide was both well tolerated and active as an add-on antiepileptic drug (AED) in patients with brain tumors. Lacosamide's novel mechanism of action will allow for concurrent use with other AEDs, as documented by its activity across many different types of AEDs used in this patient population. Larger prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jethro Hu
- 2Cochran Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Jeremy D. Rudnick
- 2Cochran Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Surasak Phuphanich
- 2Cochran Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Maciej M. Mrugala
- 3Departments of Neurology and
- 5Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Laura K. Crew
- 4Neurological Surgery, and
- 5Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniela A. Bota
- 6Departments of Neurology and
- 7Neurological Surgery, and
- 8Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California
| | | | | | | | - Homira Feely
- 1Departments of Neurosciences and
- 9Neurosurgery, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | | | - Jan Drappatz
- 10Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and
- 11Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- 10Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and
- 11Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clark C. Chen
- 9Neurosurgery, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Bob Carter
- 9Neurosurgery, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Jong Woo Lee
- 10Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and
| | | |
Collapse
|