LRRC8/VRAC Channels and the Redox Balance: A Complex Relationship

More than three decades after their first biophysical description, Volume Regulated Anion Channels (VRACs) still remain challenging to understand. Initially, VRACs were identified as the main pathway for the cell to extrude Cl^- ions during the regulatory volume decrease (RVD) mechanism contributing in fine to the recovery of normal cell volume. For years, scientists have tried unsuccessfully to find their molecular identity, leading to controversy within the field that only ended in 2014 when two independent groups demonstrated that VRACs were formed by heteromers of LRRC8 proteins. This breakthrough gave a second breath to the research field and was followed by many publications regarding LRRC8/VRACs structure/ function, physiological roles and 3D structures. Nevertheless, far from simplifying the field, these discoveries have instead exponentially increased its complexity. Indeed, the channel's biophysical properties seem to be dependent on the LRRC8 subunits composition with each heteromer showing different ion/molecule permeabilities and regulatory mechanisms. One clear example of this complexity is the intricate relationship between LRRC8/VRACs and the redox system. On one hand, VRACs appear to be directly regulated by oxidation or reduction depending on their subunit composition. On the other hand, VRACs can also impact the redox balance within the cells, through their permeability to reduced glutathione or through other as yet uncharacterized pathways. Unravelling this issue is particularly crucial as LRRC8/VRACs play an important role in a wide variety of physiological processes involving oxidative stress signaling. In this regard, we have tried to systematically identify in the literature both preand post-LRRC8 discovery as well as the interplay between VRACs and the redox system to provide new insights into this complex relationship.

Inhibition of eIF5A hypusination pathway as a new pharmacological target for stroke therapy

In eukaryotes, the polyamine pathway generates spermidine that activates the hypusination of the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 5A (eIF5A). Hypusinated-eIF5A modulates translation, elongation, termination and mitochondrial function. Evidence in model organisms like drosophila suggests that targeting polyamines synthesis might be of interest against ischemia. However, the potential of targeting eIF5A hypusination in stroke, the major therapeutic challenge specific to ischemia, is currently unknown. Using in vitro models of ischemic-related stress, we documented that GC7, a specific inhibitor of a key enzyme in the eIF5A activation pathway, affords neuronal protection. We identified the preservation of mitochondrial function and thereby the prevention of toxic ROS generation as major processes of GC7 protection. To represent a thoughtful opportunity of clinical translation, we explored whether GC7 administration reduces the infarct volume and functional deficits in an in vivo transient focal cerebral ischemia (tFCI) model in mice. A single GC7 pre- or post-treatment significantly reduces the infarct volume post-stroke. Moreover, GC7-post-treatment significantly improves mouse performance in the rotarod and Morris water-maze, highlighting beneficial effects on motor and cognitive post-stroke deficits. Our results identify the targeting of the polyamine-eIF5A-hypusine axis as a new therapeutic opportunity and new paradigm of research in stroke and ischemic diseases.

Comparative Effects of Chloride Channel Inhibitors on LRRC8/VRAC-Mediated Chloride Conductance

Chloride channels play an essential role in a variety of physiological functions and in human diseases. Historically, the field of chloride channels has long been neglected owing to the lack of powerful selective pharmacological agents that are needed to overcome the technical challenge of characterizing the molecular identities of these channels. Recently, members of the LRRC8 family have been shown to be essential for generating the volume-regulated anion channel (VRAC) current, a chloride conductance that governs the regulatory volume decrease (RVD) process. The inhibitory effects of six commonly used chloride channel inhibitors on VRAC/LRRC8-mediated chloride transport were tested in wild-type HEK-293 cells expressing LRRC8 proteins and devoid of other types of chloride channels (CFTR and ANO1/2). We explored the effectiveness of the inhibitors using the patch-clamp whole-cell approach and fluorescence-based quantification of cellular volume changes during hypotonic challenge. Both DCPIB and NFA inhibited VRAC current in a whole-cell configuration, with IC₅₀ values of 5 ± 1 μM and 55 ± 2 μM, respectively. Surprisingly, GlyH-101 and PPQ-102, two CFTR inhibitors, also inhibited VRAC conductance at concentrations in the range of their current use, with IC₅₀ values of 10 ± 1 μM and 20 ± 1 μM, respectively. T16A_inh-A01, a so-called specific inhibitor of calcium-activated Cl^- conductance, blocked the chloride current triggered by hypo-osmotic challenge, with an IC₅₀ of 6 ± 1 μM. Moreover, RVD following hypotonic challenge was dramatically reduced by these inhibitors. CFTR_inh-172 was the only inhibitor that had almost no effect on VRAC/LRRC8-mediated chloride conductance. All inhibitors tested except CFTR_inh-172 inhibited VRAC/LRRC8-mediated chloride conductance and cellular volume changes during hypotonic challenge. These results shed light on the apparent lack of chloride channel inhibitors specificity and raise the question of how these inhibitors actually block chloride conductances.