1
|
Verlaat L, Rijks N, Dilai J, Admiraal M, Beudel M, de Bie RM, van der Zwaag W, Schuurman R, van den Munckhof P, Bot M. 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Improving Visualization of the Dorsolateral Subthalamic Nucleus. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2024; 11:373-380. [PMID: 38385792 PMCID: PMC10982587 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying the dorsolateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) can be challenging due to the size and double-oblique orientation. Since 2015 we implemented 7-Tesla T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (7 T T2) for improving visualization and targeting of the dorsolateral STN. We describe the changes in surgical planning and outcome since implementation of 7 T T2 for DBS in PD. METHODS By comparing two cohorts of STN DBS patients in different time periods we evaluated the influence of 7 T T2 on STN target planning, the number of microelectrode recording (MER) trajectories, length of STN activity and the postoperative motor (UPDRS) improvement. RESULTS From February 2007 to January 2014, 1.5 and 3-Tesla T2 guided STN DBS with 3 MER channels was performed in 76 PD patients. Average length of recorded STN activity in the definite electrode trajectory was 3.9 ± 1.5 mm. From January 2015 to January 2022 7 T T2 and MER-guided STN DBS was performed in 182 PD patients. Average length of recorded STN activity in the definite electrode trajectory was 5.1 ± 1.3 mm and used MER channels decreased from 3 to 1. Average UPDRS improvement was comparable. CONCLUSION Implementation of 7 T T2 for STN DBS enabled a refinement in targeting. Combining classical DBS targeting with dorsolateral STN alignment may be used to determine the optimal trajectory. The improvement in dorsolateral STN visualization can be used for further target refinements, for example adding probabilistic subthalamic connectivity, to enhance clinical outcome of STN DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Verlaat
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Niels Rijks
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - José Dilai
- Department of Neurology and Clinical NeurophysiologyUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Admiraal
- Department of Neurology and Clinical NeurophysiologyUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology and Clinical NeurophysiologyUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Rob M.A. de Bie
- Department of Neurology and Clinical NeurophysiologyUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Wietske van der Zwaag
- Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and SciencesAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Rick Schuurman
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Pepijn van den Munckhof
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Maarten Bot
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centers, Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kremer NI, Roberts MJ, Potters WV, Dilai J, Mathiopoulou V, Rijks N, Drost G, van Laar T, van Dijk JMC, Beudel M, de Bie RMA, van den Munckhof P, Janssen MLF, Schuurman PR, Bot M. Dorsal subthalamic nucleus targeting in deep brain stimulation: microelectrode recording versus 7-Tesla connectivity. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad298. [PMID: 38025271 PMCID: PMC10664414 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Connectivity-derived 7-Tesla MRI segmentation and intraoperative microelectrode recording can both assist subthalamic nucleus targeting for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. It remains unclear whether deep brain stimulation electrodes placed in the 7-Tesla MRI segmented subdivision with predominant projections to cortical motor areas (hyperdirect pathway) achieve superior motor improvement and whether microelectrode recording can accurately distinguish the motor subdivision. In 25 patients with Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation electrodes were evaluated for being inside or outside the predominantly motor-connected subthalamic nucleus (motor-connected subthalamic nucleus or non-motor-connected subthalamic nucleus, respectively) based on 7-Tesla MRI connectivity segmentation. Hemi-body motor improvement (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III) and microelectrode recording characteristics of multi- and single-unit activities were compared between groups. Deep brain stimulation electrodes placed in the motor-connected subthalamic nucleus resulted in higher hemi-body motor improvement, compared with electrodes placed in the non-motor-connected subthalamic nucleus (80% versus 52%, P < 0.0001). Multi-unit activity was found slightly higher in the motor-connected subthalamic nucleus versus the non-motor-connected subthalamic nucleus (P < 0.001, receiver operating characteristic 0.63); single-unit activity did not differ between groups. Deep brain stimulation in the connectivity-derived 7-Tesla MRI subthalamic nucleus motor segment produced a superior clinical outcome; however, microelectrode recording did not accurately distinguish this subdivision within the subthalamic nucleus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi I Kremer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Roberts
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6211 LK, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Potters
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - José Dilai
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Varvara Mathiopoulou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Rijks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Gea Drost
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - Teus van Laar
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - J Marc C van Dijk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Rob M A de Bie
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn van den Munckhof
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus L F Janssen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands
| | - P Richard Schuurman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Bot
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rijks N, Potters WV, Dilai J, De Bie RMA, de Win M, van der Zwaag W, Schuurman R, van den Munckhof P, Bot M. Combining 7T T2 and 3T FGATIR: from physiological to anatomical identification of the subthalamic nucleus borders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:1019-1020. [PMID: 35184040 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Rijks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Potters
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - José Dilai
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob M A De Bie
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje de Win
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske van der Zwaag
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Schuurman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Bot
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kho E, Sperna Weiland NH, Vlaar APJ, Veelo DP, van der Ster BJP, Corsmit OT, Koolbergen DR, Dilai J, Immink RV. Cerebral hemodynamics during sustained intra-operative hypotension. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2022; 132:1560-1568. [PMID: 35511723 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00050.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Static cerebral autoregulation (CA) maintains cerebral blood flow (CBF) relatively constant above a mean arterial blood pressure (BPmean) of 60-65 mmHg. Below this lower limit of CA (LLCA), CBF declines along with BPmean. Data are lacking describing how CA reacts to sustained hypotension, since hypotension is usually avoided. In this study, we took advantage of a procedure requiring sustained hypotension. We assessed static CA for LLCA determination, and a more continuous CA, which counter short-term blood pressure variations. With these data, we analyzed CA during longstanding hypotension. Methods Continuous arterial blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAVmean) were monitored in 23 patients that required deep intra-operative hypotension. The LLCA was determined for every patient, and BPmean below this LLCA was classified as the patient specific hypotension. With the mean flow index (Mxa) continuous CA (Mxa-CA) was quantified. Mxa was calculated and averaged after induction of general anesthesia (baseline), every 15 minutes during, and 15 minutes after one-hour of hypotension. Functioning CA was defined as Mxa <0.4. Data are expressed as median (25th-75th percentile). Results The LLCA was located at 56 (47-74) mmHg. At baseline, Mxa was 0.21 (0.14-0.32) and 0.61 (0.48-0.78) during hypotension (p<0.01), with no appreciable change over time, n=12. After blood pressure restoration, Mxa improved, 0.25 (0.06-0.35, n=9). Conclusions Mxa-CA became and remained disturbed during the one-hour of hypotension, and improved after blood pressure restoration. This completely reversible situation suggests no ischemic hyperemia occurs and renders an adaptation mechanism during sustained hypotension unlikely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline Kho
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander P J Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise P Veelo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Björn J P van der Ster
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oskar T Corsmit
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave R Koolbergen
- Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - José Dilai
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier V Immink
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frequin HL, Bot M, Dilai J, Scholten MN, Postma M, Bour LJ, Contarino MF, de Bie RMA, Schuurman PR, van den Munckhof P. Relative Contribution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Microelectrode Recordings, and Awake Test Stimulation in Final Lead Placement during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2020; 98:118-128. [PMID: 32131066 DOI: 10.1159/000505710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD), many centers employ visualization of the nucleus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MER), and test stimulation in awake patients. The value of these steps is a subject for ongoing debate. In the current study, we determined the relative contribution of MRI targeting, multitrack MER, and awake test stimulation in final lead placement during STN DBS surgery for PD. METHODS Data on PD patients undergoing MRI-targeted STN DBS surgery with three-channel MER and awake test stimulation between February 2010 and January 2014 were analyzed to determine in which MER trajectory final leads were implanted and why this tract was chosen. RESULTS Seventy-six patients underwent implantation of 146 DBS leads. In 92% of the STN, the final leads were implanted in one of the three planned channels. In 6%, additional channels were needed. In 2%, surgery was aborted before final lead implantation due to anxiety or fatigue. The final leads were implanted in the channels with the longest STN MER signal trajectory in 60% of the STN (38% of the bilaterally implanted patients). This was the central channel containing the MRI target in 39% of the STN (18% bilaterally). The most frequently noted reasons why another channel than the central channel was chosen for final lead placement were (1) a lower threshold for side effects (54%) and (2) no or a too short trajectory of the STN MER signal (40%) in the central channel. The latter reason correlated with larger 2D (x and y) errors in our stereotactic method. CONCLUSIONS STN DBS leads were often not implanted in the MRI-planned trajectory or in the trajectory with the longest STN MER signal. Thresholds for side effects during awake test stimulation were decisive for final target selection in the majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrieke L Frequin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Bot
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - José Dilai
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije N Scholten
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Postma
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk J Bour
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Fiorella Contarino
- Department of Neurology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rob M A de Bie
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Rick Schuurman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn van den Munckhof
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| |
Collapse
|