1
|
An P, Awe C, Barbeau PS, Becker B, Belov V, Bernardi I, Bock C, Bolozdynya A, Bouabid R, Brown A, Browning J, Cabrera-Palmer B, Cervantes M, Conley E, Daughhetee J, Detwiler J, Ding K, Durand MR, Efremenko Y, Elliott SR, Fabris L, Febbraro M, Gallo Rosso A, Galindo-Uribarri A, Germer AC, Green MP, Hakenmüller J, Heath MR, Hedges S, Hughes M, Johnson BA, Johnson T, Khromov A, Konovalov A, Kozlova E, Kumpan A, Kyzylova O, Li L, Link JM, Liu J, Mahoney M, Major A, Mann K, Markoff DM, Mastroberti J, Mattingly J, Mueller PE, Newby J, Parno DS, Penttila SI, Pershey D, Prior CG, Rapp R, Ray H, Raybern J, Razuvaeva O, Reyna D, Rich GC, Ross J, Rudik D, Runge J, Salvat DJ, Sander J, Scholberg K, Shakirov A, Simakov G, Sinev G, Skuse C, Snow WM, Sosnovtsev V, Subedi T, Suh B, Tayloe R, Tellez-Giron-Flores K, Tsai YT, Ujah E, Vanderwerp J, van Nieuwenhuizen EE, Varner RL, Virtue CJ, Visser G, Walkup K, Ward EM, Wongjirad T, Yoo J, Yu CH, Zawada A, Zettlemoyer J, Zderic A. Measurement of Electron-Neutrino Charged-Current Cross Sections on ^{127}I with the COHERENT NaIνE Detector. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 131:221801. [PMID: 38101357 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.131.221801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Using an 185-kg NaI[Tl] array, COHERENT has measured the inclusive electron-neutrino charged-current cross section on ^{127}I with pion decay-at-rest neutrinos produced by the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Iodine is one the heaviest targets for which low-energy (≤50 MeV) inelastic neutrino-nucleus processes have been measured, and this is the first measurement of its inclusive cross section. After a five-year detector exposure, COHERENT reports a flux-averaged cross section for electron neutrinos of 9.2_{-1.8}^{+2.1}×10^{-40} cm^{2}. This corresponds to a value that is ∼41% lower than predicted using the MARLEY event generator with a measured Gamow-Teller strength distribution. In addition, the observed visible spectrum from charged-current scattering on ^{127}I has been measured between 10 and 55 MeV, and the exclusive zero-neutron and one-or-more-neutron emission cross sections are measured to be 5.2_{-3.1}^{+3.4}×10^{-40} and 2.2_{-0.5}^{+0.4}×10^{-40} cm^{2}, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P An
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - C Awe
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - P S Barbeau
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - B Becker
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - V Belov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
| | - I Bernardi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - C Bock
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - A Bolozdynya
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - R Bouabid
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Brown
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - J Browning
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | | | - M Cervantes
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - E Conley
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Daughhetee
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Detwiler
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - K Ding
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - M R Durand
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Y Efremenko
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S R Elliott
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - L Fabris
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M Febbraro
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - A Gallo Rosso
- Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - A C Germer
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - M P Green
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Hakenmüller
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - M R Heath
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S Hedges
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - M Hughes
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - B A Johnson
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - T Johnson
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Khromov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - A Konovalov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - E Kozlova
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - A Kumpan
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - O Kyzylova
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - L Li
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - J Liu
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - M Mahoney
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - A Major
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - K Mann
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - D M Markoff
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - J Mastroberti
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - J Mattingly
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Newby
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - D S Parno
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - S I Penttila
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - D Pershey
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - C G Prior
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - R Rapp
- Washington & Jefferson College, Washington, Pennsylvania 15301, USA
| | - H Ray
- Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
| | - J Raybern
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - O Razuvaeva
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
| | - D Reyna
- Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - G C Rich
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Ross
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - D Rudik
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - J Runge
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - D J Salvat
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - J Sander
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - K Scholberg
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Shakirov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - G Simakov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
| | - G Sinev
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - C Skuse
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - W M Snow
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - V Sosnovtsev
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - T Subedi
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
- Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Concord University, Athens, West Virginia 24712, USA
| | - B Suh
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - R Tayloe
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | | | - Y-T Tsai
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
| | - E Ujah
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - J Vanderwerp
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - E E van Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - C J Virtue
- Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - G Visser
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - K Walkup
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - E M Ward
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - T Wongjirad
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - J Yoo
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - C-H Yu
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - A Zawada
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Zettlemoyer
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - A Zderic
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang LJ, Yang XX, Zhao KZ, Chen SH, Cai MX, Ding K. [Brief introduction on compilation and editions of Yang ke xuan cui]. Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi 2023; 53:240-244. [PMID: 37727003 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112155-20230113-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Yang ke xuan cui («») is a surgical work compiled by Chen Wenzhi () of the Ming Dynasty. There are few of research on the completion and author of the book. Based on the evidences in the local chronicles, the prefaces and postscripts of the book, it has been verified that the book was originally completed no later than 1591, and Chen Wenzhi passed away no later than 1623. After investigating the 6 editions collected by 8 institutions, a collection of 11 books in total, by comparing the characteristics and circulation relationship of each edition, two systems of circulation were sorted out: block-printed edition of Xu Xi () and review edition of Xu Dachun ().
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Zhang
- Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature, Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
| | - X X Yang
- Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature, Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
| | - K Z Zhao
- Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature, Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
| | - S H Chen
- Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature, Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
| | - M X Cai
- Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature, Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
| | - K Ding
- Institute of Chinese Medical History and Literature, Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akimov D, An P, Awe C, Barbeau PS, Becker B, Belov V, Bernardi I, Blackston MA, Bock C, Bolozdynya A, Browning J, Cabrera-Palmer B, Chernyak D, Conley E, Daughhetee J, Detwiler J, Ding K, Durand MR, Efremenko Y, Elliott SR, Fabris L, Febbraro M, Gallo Rosso A, Galindo-Uribarri A, Green MP, Heath MR, Hedges S, Hoang D, Hughes M, Johnson T, Khromov A, Konovalov A, Kozlova E, Kumpan A, Li L, Link JM, Liu J, Mann K, Markoff DM, Mastroberti J, Mueller PE, Newby J, Parno DS, Penttila SI, Pershey D, Rapp R, Raybern J, Razuvaeva O, Reyna D, Rich GC, Ross J, Rudik D, Runge J, Salvat DJ, Salyapongse AM, Sander J, Scholberg K, Shakirov A, Simakov G, Sinev G, Snow WM, Sosnovtsev V, Suh B, Tayloe R, Tellez-Giron-Flores K, Tolstukhin I, Ujah E, Vanderwerp J, Varner RL, Virtue CJ, Visser G, Wongjirad T, Yen YR, Yoo J, Yu CH, Zettlemoyer J. First Probe of Sub-GeV Dark Matter beyond the Cosmological Expectation with the COHERENT CsI Detector at the SNS. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 130:051803. [PMID: 36800477 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.051803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The COHERENT Collaboration searched for scalar dark matter particles produced at the Spallation Neutron Source with masses between 1 and 220 MeV/c^{2} using a CsI[Na] scintillation detector sensitive to nuclear recoils above 9 keV_{nr}. No evidence for dark matter is found and we thus place limits on allowed parameter space. With this low-threshold detector, we are sensitive to coherent elastic scattering between dark matter and nuclei. The cross section for this process is orders of magnitude higher than for other processes historically used for accelerator-based direct-detection searches so that our small, 14.6 kg detector significantly improves on past constraints. At peak sensitivity, we reject the flux consistent with the cosmologically observed dark-matter concentration for all coupling constants α_{D}<0.64, assuming a scalar dark-matter particle. We also calculate the sensitivity of future COHERENT detectors to dark-matter signals which will ambitiously test multiple dark-matter spin scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Akimov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - P An
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - C Awe
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - P S Barbeau
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - B Becker
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - V Belov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 123182, Russian Federation
| | - I Bernardi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - M A Blackston
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - C Bock
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - A Bolozdynya
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - J Browning
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | | | - D Chernyak
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - E Conley
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Daughhetee
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Detwiler
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - K Ding
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - M R Durand
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics and Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Y Efremenko
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S R Elliott
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - L Fabris
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M Febbraro
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - A Gallo Rosso
- Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M P Green
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - M R Heath
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S Hedges
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, 94550, USA
| | - D Hoang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - M Hughes
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - T Johnson
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Khromov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - A Konovalov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 123182, Russian Federation
| | - E Kozlova
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 123182, Russian Federation
| | - A Kumpan
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - L Li
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - J Liu
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - K Mann
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - D M Markoff
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - J Mastroberti
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Newby
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - D S Parno
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - S I Penttila
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - D Pershey
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - R Rapp
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - J Raybern
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - O Razuvaeva
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 123182, Russian Federation
| | - D Reyna
- Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - G C Rich
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Ross
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - D Rudik
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - J Runge
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - D J Salvat
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - A M Salyapongse
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - J Sander
- Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - K Scholberg
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Shakirov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - G Simakov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 123182, Russian Federation
| | - G Sinev
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - W M Snow
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - V Sosnovtsev
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - B Suh
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - R Tayloe
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | | | - I Tolstukhin
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - E Ujah
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - J Vanderwerp
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - C J Virtue
- Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - G Visser
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - T Wongjirad
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - Y-R Yen
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - J Yoo
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - C-H Yu
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Zettlemoyer
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Narang A, Shin E, Ding K, Krishnan K, Casey B, Bhutani M, Herman J, Meyer J, Hong T, Koay E. Using Hydrogel to Create Spatial Separation between the Pancreas and Duodenum in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Safety and Feasibility Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
5
|
Lin Q, Ding K, Zhao R, Wang H, Ren L, Wei Y, Ye Q, Cui Y, He G, Tang W, Feng Q, Zhu D, Chang W, Lv Y, Mao Y, Wang X, Liang L, Zhou G, Liang F, Xu J. 43O Preoperative chemotherapy prior to primary tumor resection for colorectal cancer patients with asymptomatic resectable primary lesion and synchronous unresectable liver-limited metastases (RECUT): A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
|
6
|
Ding K, Chen F, Priedigkeit N, Brown DD, Weiss K, Watters R, Levine KM, Heim T, Li W, Hooda J, Lucas PC, Atkinson JM, Oesterreich S, Lee AV. Single cell heterogeneity and evolution of breast cancer bone metastasis and organoids reveals therapeutic targets for precision medicine. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1085-1088. [PMID: 35764274 PMCID: PMC10007959 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- K Ding
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Integrative Systems Biology Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - F Chen
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - N Priedigkeit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D D Brown
- Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - K Weiss
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Musculoskeletal Oncology Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - R Watters
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Musculoskeletal Oncology Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - K M Levine
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - T Heim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Musculoskeletal Oncology Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - W Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - J Hooda
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - P C Lucas
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - J M Atkinson
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - S Oesterreich
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
| | - A V Lee
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Akimov D, An P, Awe C, Barbeau P, Becker B, Belov V, Bernardi I, Blackston M, Bock C, Bolozdynya A, Bouabid R, Browning J, Cabrera-Palmer B, Chernyak D, Conley E, Daughhetee J, Detwiler J, Ding K, Durand M, Efremenko Y, Elliott S, Fabris L, Febbraro M, Gallo Rosso A, Galindo-Uribarri A, Green M, Heath M, Hedges S, Hoang D, Hughes M, Johnson B, Johnson T, Khromov A, Konovalov A, Kozlova E, Kumpan A, Li L, Link J, Liu J, Major A, Mann K, Markoff D, Mastroberti J, Mattingly J, Mueller P, Newby J, Parno D, Penttila S, Pershey D, Prior C, Rapp R, Ray H, Razuvaeva O, Reyna D, Rich G, Ross J, Rudik D, Runge J, Salvat D, Salyapongse A, Sander J, Scholberg K, Shakirov A, Simakov G, Snow W, Sosnovstsev V, Suh B, Tayloe R, Tellez-Giron-Flores K, Tolstukhin I, Ujah E, Vanderwerp J, Varner R, Virtue C, Visser G, Wongjirad T, Yen YR, Yoo J, Yu CH, Zettlemoyer J. COHERENT constraint on leptophobic dark matter using CsI data. Int J Clin Exp Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.052004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
8
|
Ding K, Liu Y, Song Y, Xu D, Li J, Wang J, Chen X, Lin R, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Cheng Y, Wu X, Yuan Y. 441TiP A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study of anlotinib plus CAPEOX versus bevacizumab plus CAPEOX as first-line therapy in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
9
|
Akimov D, An P, Awe C, Barbeau PS, Becker B, Belov V, Bernardi I, Blackston MA, Bock C, Bolozdynya A, Browning J, Cabrera-Palmer B, Chernyak D, Conley E, Daughhetee J, Detwiler J, Ding K, Durand MR, Efremenko Y, Elliott SR, Fabris L, Febbraro M, Gallo Rosso A, Galindo-Uribarri A, Green MP, Heath MR, Hedges S, Hoang D, Hughes M, Johnson T, Khromov A, Konovalov A, Kozlova E, Kumpan A, Li L, Link JM, Liu J, Mann K, Markoff DM, Mastroberti J, Mueller PE, Newby J, Parno DS, Penttila SI, Pershey D, Rapp R, Ray H, Raybern J, Razuvaeva O, Reyna D, Rich GC, Ross J, Rudik D, Runge J, Salvat DJ, Salyapongse AM, Scholberg K, Shakirov A, Simakov G, Sinev G, Snow WM, Sosnovstsev V, Suh B, Tayloe R, Tellez-Giron-Flores K, Tolstukhin I, Ujah E, Vanderwerp J, Varner RL, Virtue CJ, Visser G, Wongjirad T, Yen YR, Yoo J, Yu CH, Zettlemoyer J. Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT. Phys Rev Lett 2022; 129:081801. [PMID: 36053683 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.081801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We measured the cross section of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) using a CsI[Na] scintillating crystal in a high flux of neutrinos produced at the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. New data collected before detector decommissioning have more than doubled the dataset since the first observation of CEvNS, achieved with this detector. Systematic uncertainties have also been reduced with an updated quenching model, allowing for improved precision. With these analysis improvements, the COHERENT Collaboration determined the cross section to be (165_{-25}^{+30})×10^{-40} cm^{2}, consistent with the standard model, giving the most precise measurement of CEvNS yet. The timing structure of the neutrino beam has been exploited to compare the CEvNS cross section from scattering of different neutrino flavors. This result places leading constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions while testing lepton flavor universality and measures the weak mixing angle as sin^{2}θ_{W}=0.220_{-0.026}^{+0.028} at Q^{2}≈(50 MeV)^{2}.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Akimov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - P An
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - C Awe
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - P S Barbeau
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - B Becker
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - V Belov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
| | - I Bernardi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| | - M A Blackston
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - C Bock
- Physics Department, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - A Bolozdynya
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - J Browning
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | | | - D Chernyak
- Physics Department, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - E Conley
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Daughhetee
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Detwiler
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - K Ding
- Physics Department, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - M R Durand
- Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Y Efremenko
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S R Elliott
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - L Fabris
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M Febbraro
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - A Gallo Rosso
- Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - A Galindo-Uribarri
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - M P Green
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - M R Heath
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - S Hedges
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - D Hoang
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - M Hughes
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - T Johnson
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Khromov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - A Konovalov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
| | - E Kozlova
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
| | - A Kumpan
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - L Li
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - J Liu
- Physics Department, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - K Mann
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - D M Markoff
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - J Mastroberti
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - P E Mueller
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Newby
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - D S Parno
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - S I Penttila
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - D Pershey
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - R Rapp
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - H Ray
- Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
| | - J Raybern
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - O Razuvaeva
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
| | - D Reyna
- Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - G C Rich
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - J Ross
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - D Rudik
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - J Runge
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - D J Salvat
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - A M Salyapongse
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - K Scholberg
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - A Shakirov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - G Simakov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
- Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
| | - G Sinev
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - W M Snow
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - V Sosnovstsev
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow 115409, Russian Federation
| | - B Suh
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - R Tayloe
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | | | - I Tolstukhin
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - E Ujah
- Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA
| | - J Vanderwerp
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - R L Varner
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - C J Virtue
- Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
| | - G Visser
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - T Wongjirad
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - Y-R Yen
- Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - J Yoo
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - C-H Yu
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
| | - J Zettlemoyer
- Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Akimov D, An P, Awe C, Barbeau P, Becker B, Belov V, Bernardi I, Blackston M, Bock C, Bolozdynya A, Browning J, Cabrera-Palmer B, Chernyak D, Conley E, Daughhetee J, Detwiler J, Ding K, Durand M, Efremenko Y, Elliott S, Fabris L, Febbraro M, Galambos J, Gallo Rosso A, Galindo-Uribarri A, Green M, Heath M, Hedges S, Hoang D, Hughes M, Iverson E, Johnson T, Khromov A, Konovalov A, Kozlova E, Kumpan A, Li L, Link J, Liu J, Mann K, Markoff D, Mastroberti J, McIntyre M, Mueller P, Newby J, Parno D, Penttila S, Pershey D, Rapp R, Ray H, Raybern J, Razuvaeva O, Reyna D, Rich G, Rimal D, Ross J, Rudik D, Runge J, Salvat D, Salyapongse A, Scholberg K, Shakirov A, Simakov G, Sinev G, Snow W, Sosnovstsev V, Suh B, Tayloe R, Tellez-Giron-Flores K, Tolstukhin I, Trotter S, Ujah E, Vanderwerp J, Varner R, Virtue C, Visser G, Wongjirad T, Yen YR, Yoo J, Yu CH, Zettlemoyer J, Zhang S. Simulating the neutrino flux from the Spallation Neutron Source for the COHERENT experiment. Int J Clin Exp Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.032003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
11
|
Jackson CG, Moore KN, Cantrell L, Erickson BK, Duska LR, Richardson DL, Landrum LM, Holman LL, Walker JL, Mannel RS, Moxley KM, Queimado L, Cohoon A, Ding K, Dockery LE. A phase II trial of bevacizumab and rucaparib in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:44-49. [PMID: 35491267 PMCID: PMC10428664 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the tolerability and efficacy of combination bevacizumab rucaparib therapy in patients with recurrent cervical or endometrial cancer. PATIENTS & METHODS Thirty-three patients with recurrent cervical or endometrial cancer were enrolled. Patients were required to have tumor progression after first line treatment for metastatic, or recurrent disease. Rucaparib was given at 600 mg BID twice daily for each 21-day cycle. Bevacizumab was given at 15 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was efficacy as determined by objective response rate or 6-month progression free survival. RESULTS Of the 33 patients enrolled, 28 were evaluable. Patients with endometrial cancer had a response rate of 17% while patients with cervical cancer had a response rate of 14%. Median progression free survival was 3.8 months (95% C·I 2.5 to 5.7 months), and median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% C·I 7.0 to 15.1 months). Patients with ARID1A mutations displayed a better response rate (33%) and 6-month progression free survival (PFS6) rate (67%) than the entire study population. Observed toxicity was similar to that of previous studies with bevacizumab and rucaparib. CONCLUSIONS The combination of bevacizumab with rucaparib did not show significantly increased anti-tumor activity in all patients with recurrent cervical or endometrial cancer. However, patients with ARID1A mutations had a higher response rate and PFS6 suggesting this subgroup may benefit from the combination of bevacizumab and rucaparib. Further study is needed to confirm this observation. No new safety signals were seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C G Jackson
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - K N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - L Cantrell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - B K Erickson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota; Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - L R Duska
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - D L Richardson
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - L M Landrum
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - L L Holman
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - J L Walker
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - R S Mannel
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - K M Moxley
- Stephenson Cancer Center Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - L Queimado
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - A Cohoon
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - K Ding
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - L E Dockery
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sang CM, Shi QL, Kang YJ, Cui LM, Ding K, Liu XQ, Zhao SP. [Pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis with fertility requirements: retrospective analysis of clinical data from real world]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2022; 57:265-270. [PMID: 35484658 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210830-00475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To retrospectively analyze the pregnancy outcomes of patients with adenomyosis requiring fertility in a single center under real world condition. Methods: From June 2015 to May 2020, 231 cases of pregnancy complicated with adenomyosis diagnosed by ultrasound with fertility requirements were treated in the Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University with complete clinical data. And they were divided into three groups according to the treatment of adenomyosis before pregnancy: expectation group, drug group and operation group. The relevant data before pregnancy of the three groups were analyzed, and the pregnancy outcomes of the patients were summarized. According to whether the early pregnancy was treated with medication, the patients who were naturally conceived without symptoms of threatened abortion were divided into observation group and fetus protection group, and the pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results: (1) Compared with the expectation group, the ages of patients in the drug group and the operation group were larger [(31.5±1.8) vs (34.1±3.7) vs (36.9±3.6) years old], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Only 9 patients (11.5%, 9/78) had clinical symptoms in the expectation group, while the patients in the drug group and the operation group had a higher proportion of dysmenorrhea and increased menstrual volume. The uterine volume of the drug group and the operation group were larger than that of the expectation group [(151±46) vs (166±27) vs (97±18) cm3], the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 78.6% (33/42) of the operation group were focal adenomyosis. The proportion of natural pregnancy in the expectation group was 97.4% (76/78), and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer was mainly used in the drug group and the operation group. (2) The abortion rates of the three groups were 48.7% (26/111), 4/17, 67.5% (27/78) respectively. Compared with the drug group and the operation group, the preterm birth rate was lower [55.9% (33/111) vs 11/17 vs 12.5% (5/78)] and the natural delivery rate was higher [44.1% (26/111) vs 4/17 vs 67.5% (27/78)] in the expectation group. (3) There were 89 cases of spontaneous pregnancy without threatened abortion symptoms, including 31 cases in the observation group and 58 cases in the fetus protection group. Compared with the observation group, the abortion rate of patients in the fetus protection group was lower [41.9% (13/31) vs 34.5% (20/58)], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients with adenomyosis who have fertility requirements should be comprehensively evaluated and individualized treatment plans should be given. Pregnancy patients with adenomyosis have a high rate of miscarriage, and they should be included in the management of high-risk pregnant women. Active fetal protection treatment during early pregnancy might improve pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Sang
- Center for Gynecology, Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, China
| | - Q L Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Y J Kang
- Center for Gynecology, Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, China
| | - L M Cui
- Department of Gynecology, Qingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Weifang 262500, China
| | - K Ding
- Center for Gynecology, Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, China
| | - X Q Liu
- Center for Reproduction, Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, China
| | - S P Zhao
- Center for Gynecology, Women's and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ding K, Yu L, Huang Z, Zheng H, Yang X, Tian T, Xie R. [Differential expression profile of miRNAs in amniotic fluid exosomes from fetuses with Down syndrome]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2022; 42:293-299. [PMID: 35365456 DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.02.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the role of miRNAs in amniotic fluid exosomes in growth and development of fetuses with Down syndrome (DS). METHODS Amniotic fluid were collected from 20 fetuses with DS and 20 normal fetuses (control) to extract amniotic exosome miRNA. MicroRNA sequencing technique was used to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs between the two groups, for which gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis was performed. Three differentially expressed miRNAs with the strongest correlation with DS phenotype were selected for qPCR verification. Dual luciferase reporter assay was used to verify the activity of let-7d-5p for targeted regulation of BACH1. RESULTS We identified 15 differentially expressed miRNAs in DS as compared with the control group, among which 7 miRNAs were up-regulated and 8 were down-regulated. Target gene prediction results showed that the differentially expressed miRNAs targeted 17 DS-related genes. GO analysis revealed that the main functions of the target genes involved protein binding, protein transport, ATP binding, transferase activity and synapses. Pathway analysis revealed that the functional pathways were closely related with the development of the nervous system. qPCR results showed that the expression levels of miR-140-3p and let-7d-5p were significantly lower in DS group than in the control group (P < 0.05), as was consistent with miRNA sequencing results; the expression level of miR-4512 was significantly higher in DS group than in control group (P < 0.05), which was contrary to miRNA sequencing results. The results of double luciferase reporter gene assay confirmed that let-7d-5p was capable of targeted regulation of BACH1 expression. CONCLUSION Let-7d-5p in amniotic fluid exosomes may promote oxidative stress events in the brain of fetuses with DS by regulating BACH1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ding
- Department of Pathophysiology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China.,Department of Assisted Reproduction, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Center, Guiyang 550003, China
| | - L Yu
- Department of Pathology, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Center, Guiyang 550003, China
| | - Z Huang
- Department of Eugenic Genetics, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Center, Guiyang 550003, China
| | - H Zheng
- Department of Eugenic Genetics, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Center, Guiyang 550003, China
| | - X Yang
- Department of Eugenic Genetics, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Center, Guiyang 550003, China
| | - T Tian
- Department of Eugenic Genetics, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Center, Guiyang 550003, China
| | - R Xie
- Department of Pathophysiology, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ding K, Liu Y, Du J, Zhu Y, Xu D, Li J, Liao X, He J, Wang J, Liu Z, Sun L, Xiao Q, Wang J, Cao H, Cai Y, Cai C, Jin Z, Yuan Y. 420P A single-arm, multicenter, phase II study of anlotinib combined with CAPEOX as first-line treatment in RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (ALTER-C002). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
15
|
Fomra D, Mamun M, Ding K, Avrutin V, Özgür Ü, Kinsey N. Plasmonic colors in titanium nitride for robust and covert security features. Opt Express 2021; 29:19586-19592. [PMID: 34266066 DOI: 10.1364/oe.423155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A mechanically robust metasurface exhibiting plasmonic colors across the visible and the near-IR spectrum is designed, fabricated, and characterized. Thin TiN layers (41 nm in thickness) prepared by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (ALD) are patterned with sub-wavelength apertures (75 nm to 150 nm radii), arranged with hexagonal periodicity. These patterned films exhibit extraordinary transmission in the visible and the near-IR spectrum (550 nm to 1040 nm), which is accessible by conventional Si CCD detectors. The TiN structures are shown to withstand high levels of mechanical stresses, tested by rubbing the films against a lint-free cloth under 14.5 kPa of load for 30 minutes, while structures patterned on gold, a widely used plasmonic material, do not. The subwavelength nature of the plasmonic resonances, coupled with robustness and durability of TiN, makes these structures an attractive choice for use in nanoscale security features for heavily handled objects. Furthermore, ALD of these films enables scalability, which in conjunction with the cost-effectiveness of the process and material (TiN) makes the entire process industry friendly.
Collapse
|
16
|
Xu W, Song Y, Wang T, Yang S, Liu L, Hu Y, Zhang W, Zhou J, Gao S, Ding K, Zhang H, Zhu Z, Wang S, Xu B, Hu J, Liu T, Ji C, Xia Z, Li Y, Wang X, Zhao R, Zhang B, Li J. UPDATED EFFICACY AND SAFETY RESULTS OF ORELABRUTINIB IN THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA/SMALL CELL LEUKEMIA. Hematol Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/hon.43_2880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Xu
- Pukou CLL Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Jiangsu Province Hospital, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Hematology Department Nanjing China
| | - Y. Song
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University Hematology Department Zhengzhou China
| | - T. Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Blood Disease State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Blood Disease Hospital and Institute of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Lymphoma Center Tianjin China
| | - S. Yang
- Peking University People's Hospital Hematology Department Beijing China
| | - L. Liu
- The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University Hematology Department Shijiazhuang China
| | - Y. Hu
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Hematology Department Wuhan China
| | - W. Zhang
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital Hematology Department Beijing China
| | - J. Zhou
- Tongji Hospital Huazhong University of Science and Technology Hematology Department Wuhan China
| | - S. Gao
- The First Hospital, Jilin University Hematology Department Jilin China
| | - K. Ding
- The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China Hematology Department Hefei China
| | - H. Zhang
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital Lymphoma Tianjin China
| | - Z. Zhu
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital Hematology Department Zhengzhou China
| | - S. Wang
- Guangzhou First People's Hospital Hematology Department Guangzhou China
| | - B. Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University Hematology Department Xiamen China
| | - J. Hu
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Institute of Hematology Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Hematology Department Fuzhou China
| | - T. Liu
- West China Hospital Sichuan University Hematology Department Chengdu China
| | - C. Ji
- Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine Shandong University Hematology Department Jinan China
| | - Z. Xia
- Sate Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation of Cancer Medicine Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer center Department of Hematologic Oncology Guangzhou China
| | - Y. Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Hematology Department Shenyang China
| | - X. Wang
- School of Medicine Shandong University Hematology Jinan China
| | - R. Zhao
- Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd Beijing China
| | - B. Zhang
- Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd Beijing China
| | - J. Li
- Pukou CLL Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Jiangsu Province Hospital, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Hematology Department Nanjing China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li W, Cheng P, Zhang JB, Zhao LM, Ma YB, Ding K. Synergism of microorganisms and enzymes in solid-state fermentation of animal feed. A review. J Anim Feed Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.22358/jafs/133151/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
Sahgal A, Myrehaug S, Siva S, Masucci L, Foote M, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Maralani P, Thibault I, Wong R, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar W. CCTG SC.24/TROG 17.06: A Randomized Phase II/III Study Comparing 24Gy in 2 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Fractions Versus 20Gy in 5 Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) Fractions for Patients with Painful Spinal Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1397-1398. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Song A, Ding K, Laperriere N, Perry J, Mason W, Winch C, O'Callaghan C, Menten J, Brandes A, Phillips C, Fay M, Nishikawa R, Osoba D, Cairncross G, Roa W, Wick W, Shi W. Impact of Lymphopenia on Survival for Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma: A Secondary Analysis of the CCTG CE.6 (EORTC 26062-22061, TROG03.01) Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
20
|
Han D, Hooshangnejad H, Chen C, Ding K. A Novel Use of Hydrogel as a Dual-Buffer in Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
21
|
Hooshangnejad H, Youssefian S, Ding K. Virtual Spacer Implantation Platform Based on Finite Element Method for Simulation and Planning Patient-Specific Spacer Placement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
22
|
Chen H, Meyer J, Narang A, Han-Oh S, Ding K, Wong J, Tsien C, Li H. Delivery Uncertainty Estimation Using Daily Breath-Hold Cone-Beam CTs For Liver Proton Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.1974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
Han-Oh S, Hill C, Wang K, Ding K, Li H, Chen H, Meyer J, Narang A. Dosimetric Impact of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Uncertainty on Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
24
|
Gillen J, Essel K, Burkett W, Dvorak J, Ding K, Zheng B, Thai T, Moore K. Adiposity and influence on response to immunotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
25
|
Fang Y, Chen HQ, Zhang X, Zhang H, Xia J, Ding K, Fang ZY. Probiotic administration of lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 attenuates atherosclerotic plaque formation in ApoE-/- mice fed with a high-fat diet. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 23:3533-3541. [PMID: 31081110 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 on atherosclerotic progression in apolipoprotein-E knockout (ApoE-/-) mice fed with a high-fat diet and the underlying mechanisms of its action. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight-week-old ApoE-/- mice were treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 daily for 12 weeks. ApoE-/- mice in the vehicle group and wild type (WT) mice were treated with normal saline. Serum lipid levels, histopathological analysis of the aorta, oxidative and inflammatory indexes and activation of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway were examined. RESULTS Compared to ApoE-/- mice in the vehicle group, no changes in body weight or serum lipid levels were found in ApoE-/- mice treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1. However, the administration of GR-1 slowed down the development of atherosclerosis and reduced plaque formation. Additionally, GR-1 attenuated the development of oxidative stress and chronic inflammation in a dose-dependent manner in ApoE-/- mice fed a high-fat diet. Furthermore, in ApoE-/- mice treated with GR-1, GR-1 was demonstrated to have a role in inhibiting the translocation of NF-κB p65 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and suppressing the degradation of IκB-α. CONCLUSIONS We showed that the administration of GR-1 decreased atherosclerotic lesion size in ApoE-/- mice by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Additionally, the NF-κB signaling pathway might mediate these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Fang
- First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pouliot F, Rouleau M, Neveu B, Toren P, Morin F, Vélot L, Ding K, Caron P, Lacombe L, Lévesque É, Klotz L, Guillemette C. Evaluation of the contribution of extragonadal steroids to androgen receptor activity and to castration resistance development in recurrent prostate cancers after primary therapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33822-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
27
|
Mcinnes I, Behrens F, Mease PJ, Kavanaugh A, Ritchlin CT, Nash P, Gratacos-Masmitja J, Goupille P, Korotaeva T, Gottlieb AB, Martin R, Ding K, Pellet P, Mpofu S, Pricop L. OP0227 SECUKINUMAB VERSUS ADALIMUMAB HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON IN BIOLOGIC-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS THROUGH 52-WEEKS (EXCEED): A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PHASE-3B STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:Secukinumab (SEC), an interleukin-17A inhibitor, has demonstrated improvements on multiple domains of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1Adalimumab (ADA), a TNF inhibitor, is widely used as a first–line biologic in PsA.Objectives:To report efficacy and safety outcomes from the head-to-head EXCEED trial (NCT02745080) that compares SECvs.ADA as first–line biologic monotherapy through 52-weeks (wks), with a musculoskeletal primary endpoint in pts with active PsA.Methods:Head-to-head, phase-3b, randomised, double-blind trial: biologic naïve active PsA pts were randomised to receive SEC 300mg subcutaneous at baseline, Wk1-4, and then every 4wks (q4w) until Wk48 or ADA 40mg subcutaneous at baseline and then q2w until Wk50. The primary endpoint was superiority of SECvs.ADA on ACR20 response at Wk52. Binary and continuous variables were analysed using logistic-regression model and MMRM, respectively. Safety analysis included patients who received ≥1 dose of study-drug.Results:853 pts were randomised to receive SEC (n=426) or ADA (n=427). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment-groups except higher proportion of female pts and pts without enthesitis in the SEC group. ACR20 response at Wk52 for SECvs.ADA were 67·4%vs.61·5%, respectively (p=0·0719) (Figure). Higher clinical responses were observed with SECvs.ADA for a range of musculoskeletal, skin, and higher-hurdle outcomes (Table). A higher retention rate was observed for SEC (85.7%)vs.ADA (76.3%). Safety profiles of SEC and ADA were consistent with previous reports.2,3Conclusion:Results suggest that SEC is at least as efficacious as ADA on musculoskeletal endpoints whilst providing higher responses on skin endpoints, and is associated with a higher retention rate. No new safety signals were reported.References:[1]van der Heijde, et al. Rheumatol. (Oxford).2019; DOI10.1093/rheumatology/kez420.[2]Deodhar A, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:111.[3]Burmester GR, et al. Ann Rheum Dis.2013; 72:517-24.Figure.ACR20 Response through Wk 52Table.Efficacy Outcomes at Wk 52Endpoints, % response unless specified otherwiseSEC 300 mg(N=426)ADA 40 mg(N=427)P-value (unadjusted)*ACR2067·461·50·0719aACR2066·959·50·0239Key SecondarybPASI 9065·443·2<0·0001ACR5049·044·80·2251HAQ-DI mean change from baseline ± SE-0·58 ± 0.03-0·56 ± 0.030·5465cResolution of enthesitis (based on LEI)60·554·20·1498ExploratoryMDA43·037·90·1498VLDA18·116·60·6107DAPSA LDA+Remission61·753·10·0178PASDAS LDA+Remission51·144·10·0557*Unadjusted P-valuesvsADABinary variables were analysed using logistic regression. Pts who discontinued study treatment prematurely or took csDMARDs after week-36 were considered non-responders. Multiple imputation was used for all other missing data. HAQ-DI mean change from baseline was analysed using mixed-effect model repeated measuresaNon-responder imputation was used for pre-specified sensitivity analysisbN=215 in SEC and N=202 in ADA in psoriasis subsetcN=234 in SEC and N=264 in ADA in enthesitis subsetDisclosure of Interests:Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Frank Behrens Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Janssen, Chugai, Celgene, Lilly and Roche, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, Genzyme, Boehringer, Janssen, MSD, Celgene, Roche and Chugai, Philip J Mease Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau, Arthur Kavanaugh Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, UCB – grant/research support, Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Peter Nash Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Grant/research support from: a grant from Pfizzer to study implementation of multidisciplinary units to manage PSA in SPAIN, Consultant of: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Speakers bureau: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Philippe Goupille Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Alice B Gottlieb Grant/research support from:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Consultant of:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Speakers bureau:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Ruvie Martin Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Kevin Ding Employee of: Novartis, Pascale Pellet Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Shephard Mpofu Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Luminita Pricop Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis
Collapse
|
28
|
Gottlieb AB, Behrens F, Nash P, Merola JF, Ding K, Pellet P, Pricop L, Mcinnes I. FRI0340 COMPARISON OF SECUKINUMAB VERSUS ADALIMUMAB EFFICACY ON SKIN OUTCOMES IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: 52-WEEK RESULTS FROM THE EXCEED STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous disease comprising musculoskeletal and dermatological manifestations, especially plaque psoriasis.1Secukinumab (SEC), an IL-17A inhibitor, provided significantly greater PASI 75/100 responses in a head-to-head trialversus (vs.) etanercept, a TNF inhibitor, in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.2The objective of the EXCEED study (NCT02745080) was to investigate whether SEC is superior to adalimumab (ADA), a TNF inhibitor, as monotherapy in biologic-naive active PsA pts with active plaque psoriasis (defined as having at least one psoriatic plaque of ≥2 cm diameter or nail changes consistent with psoriasis or documented history of plaque psoriasis).Objectives:To report the pre-specified skin outcomes from the EXCEED study in the subset of pts with at least 3% body surface area (BSA) affected with psoriasis at baseline.Methods:Head-to-head, phase-3b, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group trial: pts were randomised to receive SEC 300 mg subcutaneous at baseline, Week 1-4, followed by dosing every 4 weeks (q4w) until Week 48 or ADA 40 mg subcutaneous at baseline followed by same dosing q2w until Week 50. The primary endpoint was superiority of SECvs.ADA on ACR20 response at Week 52. Pre-specified outcomes included the proportion of pts achieving a combined ACR50 and PASI 100 response, PASI 100 response, and absolute PASI score ≤3. Missing data was handled using multiple imputation.Results:853 pts were randomised to receive SEC (n=426) or ADA (n=427). At baseline, there were 215 and 202 pts having at least 3% BSA affected with psoriasis in the SEC and ADA groups, respectively. A higher proportion of patients achieved simultaneous improvement in ACR50 and PASI 100 response with SECvs.ADA (30·7%vs.19·2%; P=0·0087 [Figure]). Higher efficacy was demonstrated for SECvs.ADA for PASI 100 responses and for the proportion of pts achieving absolute PASI score ≤3 (Table).Conclusion:In this pre-specified analysis, SEC provided higher responses compared to ADA in achievement of simultaneous improvement of joint and skin disease (combined ACR50 and PASI 100 response) and in skin specific endpoints (PASI 100 and PASI score ≤3) at Week 52.References:[1]Coates LC and Helliwell PS.Clinical Med.2017;17:65–70.[2]Langley RG et al.N Engl J Med.2014;371:326–38.Figure.Combined ACR50 and PASI 100 Response through Week 52Table.Skin Specific Outcomes at Week 52Endpoints, data is presented as % responseSEC 300 mg(N = 215)ADA 40 mg(N = 202)P-value (unadjusted)PASI 10046·029·70·0007Absolute PASI score ≤379·265·00·0015P value vs. adalimumab; Unadjusted P values are presentedN, number of patients in psoriasis subsetMultiple imputation was used for handling missing dataADA, adalimumab; BSA, body surface area; PASI, psoriasis area severity index; SEC, secukinumabAcknowledgments:Suchita Dubey (Novartis) provided medical writing support.Disclosure of Interests:Alice B Gottlieb Grant/research support from:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Consultant of:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Speakers bureau:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Frank Behrens Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Janssen, Chugai, Celgene, Lilly and Roche, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, Genzyme, Boehringer, Janssen, MSD, Celgene, Roche and Chugai, Peter Nash Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: Merck, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB Pharma, Celgene, Sanofi, Regeneron, Arena, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, EMD Sorono, Avotres and LEO Pharma, Kevin Ding Employee of: Novartis, Pascale Pellet Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Luminita Pricop Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB
Collapse
|
29
|
Reshchikov MA, Vorobiov M, Andrieiev O, Ding K, Izyumskaya N, Avrutin V, Usikov A, Helava H, Makarov Y. Determination of the concentration of impurities in GaN from photoluminescence and secondary-ion mass spectrometry. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2223. [PMID: 32041980 PMCID: PMC7010669 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59033-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Photoluminescence (PL) was used to estimate the concentration of carbon in GaN grown by hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE). The PL data were compared with profiles of the impurities obtained from secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements. Comparison of PL and SIMS data has revealed that apparently high concentrations of C and O at depths up to 1 µm in SIMS profiles do not represent depth distributions of these species in the GaN matrix but are rather caused by post-growth surface contamination and knocking-in impurity species from the surface. In particular, PL analysis supplemented by reactive ion etching up to the depth of 400 nm indicates that the concentration of carbon in nitrogen sites is below 2-5 × 1015 cm-3 at any depth of GaN samples grown by HVPE. We demonstrate that PL is a very sensitive and reliable tool to determine the concentrations of impurities in the GaN matrix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Reshchikov
- Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23220, USA.
| | - M Vorobiov
- Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23220, USA
| | - O Andrieiev
- Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23220, USA
| | - K Ding
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23220, USA
| | - N Izyumskaya
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23220, USA
| | - V Avrutin
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23220, USA
| | - A Usikov
- Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 49 Kronverkskiy Ave., 197101, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - H Helava
- Nitride Crystals, Inc. 9702 Gayton Road, Ste. 320, Richmond, VA, 23238, USA
| | - Yu Makarov
- Nitride Crystals, Inc. 9702 Gayton Road, Ste. 320, Richmond, VA, 23238, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wells J, Sidhu A, Ding K, Heng D, Shepherd F, Ellis P, Bradbury P, Jonker D, Moore M, Siu L, Gelmon K, Karapetis C, Shapiro J, Nott L, O’Callaghan C, Parulekar W, Seymour L, Smoragiewicz M, Monzon J. Complementary medicine (CM) use in phase III clinical trials (P3T) conducted by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz265.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
31
|
Rao A, Shin E, Meyer J, Thompson E, Fu W, Hu C, Fishman E, Weiss M, Wolfgang C, Burkhart R, He J, Kerdsirichariat T, Herman J, Ding K, Narang A. Evaluation of a Novel Absorbable Radiopaque Hydrogel in Patients Undergoing Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
32
|
Castellano T, Qiu Y, Papaila A, Moore K, Mason N, Thai T, Ding K, Gunderson C. Predictive utility of qualitative feature clusters of pretreatment CT imaging compared to traditional PET/CT to predict treatment outcomes in locoregionally advanced cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
33
|
Greenwood A, Crim A, Ding K, Dvorak J, Hile E, Holman L. Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction among cervical cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
34
|
Gillen J, Enty M, Rowland M, Dvorak J, Ding K, Moore K. Evaluating the impact of a history of breast cancer on chemotherapy toxicities experienced in women with high grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
35
|
Essel K, Qiu Y, Thai T, Ding K, Burkett W, Zheng B, Moore K. Quantitative computed tomography image feature analysis predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
36
|
Dockery L, Rubenstein A, Ding K, Mashburn S, Burkett W, Montgomery A, Doo D, Arend R, Moore K, Gunderson C. Extending the platinum-free Interval: The impact of omitting 2nd line platinum chemotherapy in intermediate platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
37
|
Liu H, Zhang J, Ding K, Chen X, Han T. The development and characterisation of an immunoaffinity column used for the simultaneous selective extraction of Fusarium toxins from grain products. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 2019. [DOI: 10.3920/qas2018.1496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H.J. Liu
- Food Science and Engineering College, Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Detection and Control for Spoilage Organisms and Pesticides, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China P.R
| | - J.N. Zhang
- Food Science and Engineering College, Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Detection and Control for Spoilage Organisms and Pesticides, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China P.R
| | - K. Ding
- Food Science and Engineering College, Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Detection and Control for Spoilage Organisms and Pesticides, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China P.R
| | - X.N. Chen
- Food Science and Engineering College, Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Detection and Control for Spoilage Organisms and Pesticides, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China P.R
| | - T. Han
- Food Science and Engineering College, Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Detection and Control for Spoilage Organisms and Pesticides, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China P.R
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lu L, Song XP, Ding K, Ding B. [Investigation on the health status of workers exposed to dimethylformamid]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2019; 36:896-899. [PMID: 30812073 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective: By analyzing the examination results of physical examination of workers exposed to DMF among 32 factories in some areas of a province, to investigate the working years of dimethylformamide (DMF) poisoning and the impact on the health status of exposed workers, and to explore the targeted intervention strategies. Methods: From February to May 2018, 2, 457 workers exposed to DMF in some areas of Jiangsu Province were selected as survey targets. Cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the health status of workers exposed to health, And the health surveillance data, detection data of occupational disease risk factors in the workplace were collected and analyzed, respectively. Results: The positive rate of abnormal liver function and B-ultrasound of males exposed to DMF was significantly higher than that of females. The abnormal rates of liver function, blood pressure and B-ultrasound in workers aged between 60 and 69 were higher in contrast to those in any other age groups. And the differences was statistically significant. In particular, the highest rate of abnormal blood pressure was found in workers exposed 21-30 years (39.2%) , the highest rate of abnormal liver function was found in workers exposed 11-20 years (44.3%) , and the highest rate of abnormal B-ultrasound was found in workers exposed 0-10 years (60.4%) . Conclusion: Long-term exposure to dimethylformamide can affect workers' liver function and blood pressure. Specifically, with the increase of contact age, the degree of chronic damage to liver, cardiovascular and other organs also increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Lu
- Yixing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yixing 214200, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Castellano T, Brinkman D, Ding K, Gunderson C. Outcomes associated with chemoradiation versus radiation alone in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
40
|
Essel K, Thai T, Ding K, Burkett W, Buechel M, Zheng B, Moore K. Quantitative computed tomography image feature analysis predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Essel K, Behbakht K, Lai T, Hand L, Evans E, Dvorak J, Ding K, Konecny G, Moore K. PARPi after PARPi in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
42
|
Essel K, Thai T, Ding K, Burkett W, Moore K. Quantitative computed tomography image feature analysis predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
43
|
Cheung WY, Kornelsen EA, Mittmann N, Leighl NB, Cheung M, Chan KK, Bradbury PA, Ng RCH, Chen BE, Ding K, Pater JL, Tu D, Hay AE. The economic impact of the transition from branded to generic oncology drugs. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:89-93. [PMID: 31043808 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Economic evaluations are an integral component of many clinical trials. Costs used in those analyses are based on the prices of branded drugs when they first enter the market. The effect of genericization on the cost-effectiveness (ce) or cost-utility (cu) of an intervention is unknown because economic analyses are rarely updated using the costs of generic drugs. Methods We re-examined the ce or cu of regimens previously evaluated in Canadian Cancer Trials Group (cctg) studies that included prospective economic evaluations and where genericization has occurred or is anticipated in Canada. We incorporated the new costs of generic drugs to characterize changes in ce or cu. We also determined acceptable cost levels of generic drugs that would make regimens reimbursable in a publicly funded health care system. Results The four randomized controlled trials included (representing 1979 patients) were cctg br.10 (early lung cancer, adjuvant vinorelbine-cisplatin vs. observation, n = 172), cctg br.21 (metastatic lung cancer, erlotinib vs. placebo, n = 731), cctg co.17 (metastatic colon cancer, cetuximab vs. best supportive care, n = 557), and cctg ly.12 (relapsed or refractory lymphoma, gemcitabine-dexamethasone-cisplatin vs. cytarabine-dexamethasone-cisplatin, n = 619). Since the initial publication of those trials, the genericization of vinorelbine, erlotinib, cetuximab, and cisplatin has taken place or is expected in Canada. Costs of generics improved the ces and cus of treatment significantly. For example, genericization of erlotinib ($1460.25 per 30 days) resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (icer) of $45,746 per life-year gained compared with $94,638 for branded erlotinib. Likewise, genericization of cetuximab ($275.80 per 100 mg) produced an icer of $261,126 per quality-adjusted life-year (qaly) gained compared with $299,613 for branded cetuximab. Decreases in the cost of generic cetuximab to $129.39 and $63.51 would further improve the icer to $150,000 and $100,000 per QALY respectively. Conclusions Genericization of a costly oncology drug can modify the ce and cu of a regimen significantly. Failure to revisit economic analyses with the costs of generics could be a missed opportunity for funding bodies to optimize value-based allocation of health care resources. At current levels, the costs of generics might not be sufficiently low to sustain publicly funded health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - M Cheung
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - K K Chan
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | | | - R C H Ng
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - B E Chen
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - K Ding
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | | | - D Tu
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - A E Hay
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Levine KM, Ding K, Priedigkeit N, Sikora MJ, Tasdemir N, Zhu L, Tseng GC, Jankowitz RC, Dabbs DJ, McAuliffe PF, Lee AV, Oesterreich S. Abstract P5-04-21: FGFR4 is a novel druggable target for recurrent ER-positive breast cancers. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-04-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Breast cancer recurrence is a major clinical problem for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) disease, even decades after initial surgery. These long-term recurrences are a challenge for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and are particularly frequent for the histological subtype of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). To study the long-term endocrine resistance seen in ILC patients, our lab recently generated six long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) models of ILC cells and performed RNA-Sequencing to identify differentially expressed genes that ostensibly allow these cells to grow in the absence of estrogen. We overlapped these results with a previously published microarray dataset of tamoxifen-resistant cells, and found that FGFR4 is the most consistently overexpressed gene in the setting of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy in ILC cells. From a recent publication of RNA-Seq from other LTED models, FGFR4 RNA overexpression is also seen in all five IDC cell lines.
Hypothesis
FGFR4 is an important mediator of acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer.
Methods
To study the role of FGFR4 in vitro, we used multiple shRNAs and specific small molecule inhibition for growth assays. To study the role of FGFR4 in de novo resistance to endocrine therapy, we collected 129 well curated ER+ ILC tumor specimens and performed gene expression analysis on the pre-treatment samples using a custom NanoString panel. To study the role of FGFR4 in acquired resistance, we collected over 50 pairs of primary-metastatic ER+ tumors and performed exon capture based RNA-Sequencing.
Results
FGFR4 inhibition decreases parental and LTED cell growth in classic 2D conditions and in colony formation assays. The LTED cells, with higher FGFR4 expression, are more sensitive to its inhibition. For the parental cells, combination FGFR4 and ER-targeting drugs results in synergistic decreases in growth. In our database of primary ILC clinical samples, increased expression of FGFR4 is predictive of shorter time to distant recurrence. Among primary-recurrent tumor pairs, FGFR4 is an outlier expression gain in 20/50 (40%), spanning all recurrence sites studied (i.e. local recurrences, and metastases to the brain, bone, ovaries, and GI tract). Finally, in analyzing large cohorts of metastatic tumors, there is a significant enrichment of hotspot FGFR4 mutations in tumors originating in the breast, with >2% of metastatic ILC tumors containing such a mutation.
Conclusion/Future studies
FGFR4 may play an important role in de novo resistance to endocrine therapy in ILC and acquired resistance in both ILC and IDC. Ongoing studies include overexpression of wild-type and FGFR4 hotspot mutations in ILC and IDC cell lines to determine growth and metastatic phenotypes.
Citation Format: Levine KM, Ding K, Priedigkeit N, Sikora MJ, Tasdemir N, Zhu L, Tseng GC, Jankowitz RC, Dabbs DJ, McAuliffe PF, Lee AV, Oesterreich S. FGFR4 is a novel druggable target for recurrent ER-positive breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KM Levine
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - K Ding
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - N Priedigkeit
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - MJ Sikora
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - N Tasdemir
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - L Zhu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - GC Tseng
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - RC Jankowitz
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - DJ Dabbs
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - PF McAuliffe
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - AV Lee
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - S Oesterreich
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vigneault E, Morton G, Parulekar WR, Niazi TM, Springer CW, Barkati M, Chung P, Koll W, Kamran A, Monreal M, Ding K, Loblaw A. Randomised Phase II Feasibility Trial of Image-guided External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (CCTG PR15/ NCT01982786). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:527-533. [PMID: 29903505 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We conducted a multicentre feasibility study to assess the ability to randomise patients between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and IGRT + high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost and to adhere to appropriate radiation quality assurance standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS The primary end point was to determine the ability to randomise 60 patients over an 18 month period. Arm 1 (IGRT) patients received 78 Gy in 39 fractions or 60 Gy in 20 fractions (physician's preference), whereas arm 2 (IGRT + HDR) received 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with HDR boost of 15 Gy. The secondary end points included >grade 3 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at 3 months, validation of a prospectively defined radiation oncology quality assurance to assess treatment compliance. All analyses were descriptive; no formal comparisons between treatment arms were carried out. RESULTS Between April 2014 and September 2015, 57 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were randomised between IGRT alone (arm 1; n = 29) and IGRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost (arm 2; n = 28). Overall, 93% received the treatment as randomised. There were four patients (one on IGRT arm 1 and three patients on the IGRT + HDR arm 2) who were treated differently from randomisation assignment. For the 29 patients receiving IGRT (arm 1), there were 14 cases reported with minor deviations and three with major deviations. For patients on IGRT + HDR (arm 2), there were 18 cases reported with minor deviations and two with major deviations. At 3 months in the IGRT group (arm 1), one patient reported grade 3 diarrhoea, whereas in the IGRT + HDR group (arm 2), two patients reported grade 3 haematuria. No other gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION The pilot study showed the feasibility of randomisation between treatment with IGRT alone versus IGRT + HDR boost. Treatment compliance was good, including adherence to quality assurance standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Vigneault
- Département de Radio-Oncologie, Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| | - G Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W R Parulekar
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - T M Niazi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - C W Springer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Windsor Regional Hospital, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Barkati
- Département de Radio-Oncologie, CHUM Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - P Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Koll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lakeridge Hospital, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr H Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - M Monreal
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Ding
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Buechel M, Dey A, Dwivedi S, Crim A, Banerjee Mustafi S, Zhang R, Ding K, Moore K, Bhattacharya R. Targeting BMI1 for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
48
|
Liu N, Ding K, Wang JQ, Jia SC, Wang JP, Xu TS. Detoxification, metabolism, and glutathione pathway activity of aflatoxin B1 by dietary lactic acid bacteria in broiler chickens. J Anim Sci 2018; 95:4399-4406. [PMID: 29108062 DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and the glutathione (GSH) pathway are protective against aflatoxin, but information on the effect of LAB on aflatoxin metabolism and GSH activity in farm animals is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LAB and aflatoxin B (AFB) on growth performance, aflatoxin metabolism, and GSH pathway activity using 480 male Arbor Acres broiler chickens from d 1 to 35 of age. Diets were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design, including AFB at 0 or 40 µg/kg of feed and LAB at 0 or 3 × 10 cfu/kg of feed, and the LAB was a mixture of equal amounts of , , and . The results showed that there were highly significant ( < 0.01) effects of AFB toxicity, LAB protection, and their interaction on ADFI, ADG, and G:F of broilers during d 1 to 35. Compared with the AFB diet, the LAB diet reduced ( < 0.05) the residues of AFB in the liver, kidney, serum, ileal digesta, and excreta on d 14 by 121.5, 80.6, 43.7, 47.0, and 26.5%, respectively, and on d 35 by 40.6, 60.2, 131.7, 37.9, and 32.9%, respectively, whereas the LAB diet increased ( < 0.05) the contents of aflatoxin M, a metabolite of AFB, in the liver, kidney, serum, and ileal digesta on d 14 by 98.2, 154.2, 168.6, 19.1, and 34.1%, respectively, and in the kidney and serum on d 35 by 32.6 and 142.2%, respectively. For the activity of the GSH pathway in the liver and duodenal mucosa, there were significant ( ≤ 0.01) effects of LAB and AFB on reduced GSH, glutathione S-transferases (GST), and glutathione reductase (GR) on d 14 and 35; compared with the control diet, the LAB diet increased ( < 0.05) GSH, GST, and GR by a range of 11.6 to 86.1%, and compared with the AFB diet, the LAB diet increased ( < 0.05) GSH, GST, and GR by a range of 24.1 to 146.9%. In the liver, there were interactions ( < 0.05) on GSH and GST on d 14 and on GSH on d 35; in the mucosa, interactions were significant ( ≤ 0.01) on GSH and GR on d 14 and on GST on d 35. It can be concluded that LAB is effective in the detoxification of AFB by modulating toxin metabolism and activating the GSH pathway in animals.
Collapse
|
49
|
Liu N, Ding K, Wang J, Deng Q, Gu K, Wang J. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and smectite after aflatoxin B 1 challenge on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood parameters of broilers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2018; 102:953-961. [PMID: 29638014 DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and smectite on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood parameters of broilers that were fed diets contaminated with aflatoxin B1 (AFB1 ). A total of 480 newly hatched male Arbor Acres broilers were randomly allocated into four groups with six replicates of 20 chicks each. The broilers were fed diets with the AFB1 (40 μg/kg) challenge or without (control) it and supplemented with smectite (3.0 g/kg) or LAB (4.0 × 1010 CFU/kg) based on the AFB1 diet. The trial lasted for 42 days. The results showed that during days 1-42 of AFB1 challenge, the feed intake (FI) and body weight gain (BWG) were depressed (p < .05). The inclusion of LAB and smectite increased (p < .05) the BWG by 71.58 and 41.89 g/bird, respectively, which reached the level of the control diet (p ≥ .05), but there were no differences (p ≥ .05) in performance between LAB and smectite. LAB and smectite also increased (p < .05) the apparent total tract digestibility of the crude protein. Regarding the blood parameters, AFB1 decreased (p < .05) the levels of red blood cell count, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, haemoglobin, albumin and total protein. In the meantime, the AFB1 increased (p < .05) leucocyte counts, urea nitrogen, cholesterol, total bilirubin, creatinine, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and alkaline phosphatase. By contrast, LAB and smectite affected (p < .05) these parameters in the opposite direction. It can be concluded that after the AFB1 challenge, LAB and smectite have similar effects on the growth and health of the broilers, suggesting that LAB could be an alternative against AFB1 in commercial animal feeds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Liu
- Department of Animal Production, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
| | - K Ding
- Hongxiang Biological Feed Laboratory, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
| | - J Wang
- Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Q Deng
- Department of Animal Production, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
| | - K Gu
- Department of Animal Production, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
| | - J Wang
- Department of Animal Production, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yerushalmi R, Dong B, Chapman JW, Goss PE, Pollak MN, Burnell MJ, Levine MN, Bramwell VHC, Pritchard KI, Whelan TJ, Ingle JN, Shepherd LE, Parulekar WR, Han L, Ding K, Gelmon KA. Impact of baseline BMI and weight change in CCTG adjuvant breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1560-1568. [PMID: 28379421 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We hypothesized that increased baseline BMI and BMI change would negatively impact clinical outcomes with adjuvant breast cancer systemic therapy. Methods Data from chemotherapy trials MA.5 and MA.21; endocrine therapy MA.12, MA.14 and MA.27; and trastuzumab HERA/MA.24 were analyzed. The primary objective was to examine the effect of BMI change on breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) landmarked at 5 years; secondary objectives included BMI changes at 1 and 3 years; BMI changes on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS); and effects of baseline BMI. Stratified analyses included trial therapy and composite trial stratification factors. Results In pre-/peri-/early post-menopausal chemotherapy trials (N = 2793), baseline BMI did not impact any endpoint and increased BMI from baseline did not significantly affect BCFI (P = 0.85) after 5 years although it was associated with worse BCFI (P = 0.03) and DSS (P = 0.07) after 1 year. BMI increase by 3 and 5 years was associated with better DSS (P = 0.01; 0.01) and OS (P = 0.003; 0.05). In pre-menopausal endocrine therapy trial MA.12 (N = 672), patients with higher baseline BMI had worse BCFI (P = 0.02) after 1 year, worse DSS (P = 0.05; 0.004) after 1 and 5 years and worse OS (P = 0.01) after 5 years. Increased BMI did not impact BCFI (P = 0.90) after 5 years, although it was associated with worse BCFI (P = 0.01) after 1 year. In post-menopausal endocrine therapy trials MA.14 and MA.27 (N = 8236), baseline BMI did not significantly impact outcome for any endpoint. BMI change did not impact BCFI or DSS after 1 or 3 years, although a mean increased BMI of 0.3 was associated with better OS (P = 0.02) after 1 year. With the administration of trastuzumab (N = 1395) baseline BMI and BMI change did not significantly impact outcomes. Conclusions Higher baseline BMI and BMI increases negatively affected outcomes only in pre-/peri-/early post-menopausal trial patients. Otherwise, BMI increases similar to those expected in healthy women either did not impact outcome or were associated with better outcomes. Clinical Trials numbers CAN-NCIC-MA5; National Cancer Institute (NCI)-V90-0027; MA.12-NCT00002542; MA.14-NCT00002864; MA.21-NCT00014222; HERA, NCT00045032;CAN-NCIC-MA24; MA-27-NCT00066573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Yerushalmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - B Dong
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG; Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - J W Chapman
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG; Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - P E Goss
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, USA
| | - M N Pollak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal
| | - M J Burnell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John
| | - M N Levine
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario
| | - V H C Bramwell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary
| | - K I Pritchard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - T J Whelan
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
| | - J N Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - L E Shepherd
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG; Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - W R Parulekar
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG; Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - L Han
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG; Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - K Ding
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG; Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - K A Gelmon
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|