1
|
Smith J, Cvejic E, Houssami N, Schonberg MA, Vincent W, Naganathan V, Jansen J, Dodd RH, Wallis K, McCaffery KJ. Randomized Trial of Information for Older Women About Cessation of Breast Cancer Screening Invitations. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08656-3. [PMID: 38409512 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08656-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older women receive no information about why Australia's breast screening program (BreastScreen) invitations cease after 74 years. We tested how providing older women with the rationale for breast screening cessation impacted informed choice (adequate knowledge; screening attitudes aligned with intention). METHODS In a three-arm online randomized trial, eligible participants were females aged 70-74 years who had recently participated in breast screening (within 5 years), without personal breast cancer history, recruited through Qualtrics. Participants read a hypothetical scenario in which they received a BreastScreen letter reporting no abnormalities on their mammogram. They were randomized to receive the letter: (1) without any rationale for screening cessation (control); (2) with screening cessation rationale in printed-text form (e.g., downsides of screening outweigh the benefits after age 74); or (3) with screening cessation rationale presented in an animation video form. The primary outcome was informed choice about continuing/stopping breast screening beyond 74 years. RESULTS A total of 376 participant responses were analyzed. Compared to controls (n = 122), intervention arm participants (text [n = 132] or animation [n = 122]) were more likely to make an informed choice (control 18.0%; text 32.6%, p = .010; animation 40.5%, p < .001). Intervention arm participants had more adequate knowledge (control 23.8%; text 59.8%, p < .001; animation 68.9%, p < .001), lower screening intentions (control 17.2%; text 36.4%, p < .001; animation 49.2%, p < .001), and fewer positive screening attitudes regarding screening for themselves in the animation arm, but not in the text arm (control 65.6%; text 51.5%, p = .023; animation 40.2%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Providing information to older women about the rationale for breast cancer screening cessation increased informed decision-making in a hypothetical scenario. This study is an important first step in improving messaging provided by national cancer screening providers direct to older adults. Further research is needed to assess the impact of different elements of the intervention and the impact of providing this information in clinical practice, with more diverse samples. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTRN12623000033640.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with the Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wendy Vincent
- BreastScreen NSW, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Centre for Education and Research On Ageing, Concord Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with the Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katharine Wallis
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Edward Ford Building (A27), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zadro JR, Ferreira GE, Stahl-Timmins W, Egger V, Elkins MR, Gamble AR, O'Keeffe M, McCaffery KJ, Harris IA, Ardern CL, West CA, Maher CG, Hoffmann TC. Development of the Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative studies (RIVA-C) checklist and guide. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024:bmjebm-2023-112784. [PMID: 38242568 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
People often use infographics (also called visual or graphical abstracts) as a substitute for reading the full text of an article. This is a concern because most infographics do not present sufficient information to interpret the research appropriately and guide wise health decisions. The Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative studies (RIVA-C) checklist and guide aims to improve the completeness with which research findings of comparative studies are communicated and avoid research findings being misinterpreted if readers do not refer to the full text. The primary audience for the RIVA-C checklist and guide is developers of infographics that summarise comparative studies of health and medical interventions. The need for the RIVA-C checklist and guide was identified by a survey of how people use infographics. Possible checklist items were informed by a systematic review of how infographics report research. We then conducted a two-round, modified Delphi survey of 92 infographic developers/designers, researchers, health professionals and other key stakeholders. The final checklist includes 10 items. Accompanying explanation and both text and graphical examples linked to the items were developed and pilot tested over a 6-month period. The RIVA-C checklist and guide was designed to facilitate the creation of clear, transparent and sufficiently detailed infographics which summarise comparative studies of health and medical interventions. Accurate infographics can ensure research findings are communicated appropriately and not misinterpreted. By capturing the perspectives of a wide range of end users (eg, authors, informatics editors, journal editors, consumers), we are hopeful of rapid endorsement and implementation of RIVA-C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Zadro
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Giovanni E Ferreira
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Veronika Egger
- Is-design, International Institute for Information design (IIID), Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark R Elkins
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew R Gamble
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary O'Keeffe
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Clare L Ardern
- Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Courtney A West
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris G Maher
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tammy C Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Copp T, Thompson R, Hammarberg K, Lensen S, Augustine L, Doust J, Peate M, Cvejic E, Mol BW, Lieberman D, McCaffery KJ. Attitudes, knowledge and practice regarding the anti-müllerian hormone test among general practitioners and reproductive specialists: A cross-sectional study. BJOG 2024. [PMID: 38196321 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe clinicians' attitudes, knowledge and practice relating to the anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) test. DESIGN Cross-sectional nationwide survey. SETTING Australia. POPULATION OR SAMPLE A total of 362 general practitioners (GPs), gynaecologists and reproductive specialists. METHODS Clinicians were recruited through relevant professional organisations, with data collected from May 2021 to April 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinicians' attitudes, knowledge and practice relating to the AMH test, measured using multiple choice, Likert scales and open-ended items. RESULTS Fifteen percent of GPs (n = 27) and 40% of gynaecologists and other specialists (n = 73) order at least one AMH test per month. Specialists reported raising the idea of testing most of the time, whereas GPs reported that patient request was more common. Half of clinicians lacked confidence interpreting (n = 182, 51%) and explaining (n = 173, 48%) an AMH result to their patients. Five percent (n = 19) believed the test was moderately/very useful in predicting natural conception/birth and 22% (n = 82) believed the same for predicting premature menopause, despite evidence that the test cannot reliably predict either. Forty percent (n = 144) had previously ordered the test to help with reproductive planning and 21% (n = 75) to provide reassurance about fertility. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians reported use of AMH testing in clinical circumstances not supported by the evidence. With the proliferation of direct-to-consumer testing, efforts to support clinicians in the judicious use of testing and effectively navigating patient requests are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lidiya Augustine
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Australian Women and Girls' Health Research Centre, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Devora Lieberman
- City Fertility Centre Pty Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nickel B, Ormiston‐Smith N, Hammerton L, Cvejic E, Vardon P, Mcinally Z, Legerton P, Baker K, Isautier J, Larsen E, Giles M, Brennan ME, McCaffery KJ, Houssami N. Psychosocial outcomes and health service use after notifying women participating in population breast screening when they have dense breasts: a BreastScreen Queensland randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2023; 219:423-428. [PMID: 37751916 PMCID: PMC10952548 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robust evidence regarding the benefits and harms of notifying Australian women when routine breast screening identifies that they have dense breasts is needed for informing future mammography population screening practice and policy. OBJECTIVES To assess the psychosocial and health services use effects of notifying women participating in population-based breast cancer screening that they have dense breasts; to examine whether the mode of communicating this information about its implications (print, online formats) influences these effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study population comprises women aged 40 years or older who attend BreastScreen Queensland Sunshine Coast services for mammographic screening and are found to have dense breasts (BI-RADS density C or D). The randomised controlled trial includes three arms (952 women each): standard BreastScreen care (no notification of breast density; control arm); notification of dense breasts in screening results letter and print health literacy-sensitive information (intervention arm 1) or a link or QR code to online video-based health literacy-sensitive information (intervention arm 2). Baseline demographic data will be obtained from BreastScreen Queensland. Outcomes data will be collected in questionnaires at baseline and eight weeks, twelve months, and 27 months after breast screening. Primary outcomes will be psychological outcomes and health service use; secondary outcomes will be supplemental screening outcomes, cancer worry, perceived breast cancer risk, knowledge about breast density, future mammographic screening intentions, and acceptability of notification about dense breasts. ETHICS APPROVAL Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Ethics Committee (HREC/2023/QGC/89770); Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service Research Governance and Development (SSA/2023/QSC/89770). DISSEMINATION OF FINDINGS Findings will be reported in peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences. They will also be reported to BreastScreen Queensland, BreastScreen Australia, Cancer Australia, and other bodies involved in cancer care and screening, including patient and support organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000001695p (prospective: 9 January 2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- School of Public Healththe University of SydneySydneyNSW
| | | | - Lisa Hammerton
- Sunshine Coast Service, BreastScreen QueenslandNambourQLD
| | - Erin Cvejic
- School of Public Healththe University of SydneySydneyNSW
| | - Paul Vardon
- Cancer Screening Unit, Queensland Department of HealthBrisbaneQLD
| | - Zoe Mcinally
- Cancer Screening Unit, Queensland Department of HealthBrisbaneQLD
| | - Paula Legerton
- Cancer Screening Unit, Queensland Department of HealthBrisbaneQLD
| | - Karen Baker
- Cancer Screening Unit, Queensland Department of HealthBrisbaneQLD
| | | | - Emma Larsen
- Sunshine Coast Service, BreastScreen QueenslandNambourQLD
| | | | - Meagan E Brennan
- School of Public Healththe University of SydneySydneyNSW
- The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSydneyNSW
| | | | - Nehmat Houssami
- School of Public Healththe University of SydneySydneyNSW
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney and Cancer Council NSWSydneyNSW
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith J, Dodd RH, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J, Wallis K, McCaffery KJ. Screening for cancer beyond recommended upper age limits: views and experiences of older people. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad196. [PMID: 37930739 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, screening programmes and clinical practice guidelines recommend when older adults should stop cancer screening using upper age limits, but it is unknown how older adults view these recommendations. OBJECTIVE To examine older adults' views and experiences about continuing or stopping cancer screening beyond the recommended upper age limit for breast, cervical, prostate and bowel cancer. DESIGN Qualitative, semi-structured interviews. SETTING Australia, telephone. SUBJECTS A total of 29 community-dwelling older adults (≥70-years); recruited from organisation newsletters, mailing lists and Facebook advertisements. METHODS Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Firstly, older adults were on a spectrum between trusting recommendations and actively deciding about cancer screening, with some who were uncertain. Secondly, participants reported limited in-depth discussions with health professionals about cancer screening. In primary care, discussions were focused on checking they were up to date with screening or going over results. Discussions mostly only occurred if older adults initiated themselves. Finally, participants had a socially- and self-constructed understanding of screening recommendations and potential outcomes. Perceived reasons for upper age limits were cost, reduced cancer risk or ageism. Risks of screening were understood in relation to their own social experiences (e.g. shared stories about friends with adverse outcomes of cancer treatment or conversations with friends/family about controversy around prostate screening). CONCLUSIONS Direct-to-patient information and clinician support may help improve communication about the changing benefit to harm ratio of cancer screening with increasing age and increase understanding about the rationale for an upper age limit for cancer screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katharine Wallis
- General Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Queensland, QLD, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scherer LD, Suresh K, Lewis CL, McCaffery KJ, Hersch J, Cappella JN, Morse B, Tate CE, Mosley BS, Schmiege S, Schapira MM. Assessing and Understanding Reactance, Self-Exemption, Disbelief, Source Derogation and Information Conflict in Reaction to Overdiagnosis in Mammography Screening: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:789-802. [PMID: 37705500 PMCID: PMC10843591 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231195603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Overdiagnosis is a concept central to making informed breast cancer screening decisions, and yet some people may react to overdiagnosis with doubt and skepticism. The present research assessed 4 related reactions to overdiagnosis: reactance, self-exemption, disbelief, and source derogation (REDS). The degree to which the concept of overdiagnosis conflicts with participants' prior beliefs and health messages (information conflict) was also assessed as a potential antecedent of REDS. We developed a scale to assess these reactions, evaluated how those reactions are related, and identified their potential implications for screening decision making. METHODS Female participants aged 39 to 49 years read information about overdiagnosis in mammography screening and completed survey questions assessing their reactions to that information. We used a multidimensional theoretical framework to assess dimensionality and overall domain-specific internal consistency of the REDS and Information Conflict questions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using data randomly split into a training set and test set. Correlations between REDS, screening intentions, and other outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Five-hundred twenty-five participants completed an online survey. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified that Reactance, Self Exemption, Disbelief, Source Derogation, and Information Conflict represent unique constructs. A reduced 20-item scale was created by selecting 4 items per construct, which showed good model fit. Reactance, Disbelief, and Source Derogation were associated with lower intent to use information about overdiagnosis in decision making and the belief that informing people about overdiagnosis is unimportant. CONCLUSIONS REDS and Information Conflict are distinct but correlated constructs that are common reactions to overdiagnosis. Some of these reactions may have negative implications for making informed screening decisions. HIGHLIGHTS Overdiagnosis is a concept central to making informed breast cancer screening decisions, and yet when provided information about overdiagnosis, some people are skeptical.This research developed a measure that assessed different ways in which people might express skepticism about overdiagnosis (reactance, self-exemption, disbelief, source derogation) and also the perception that overdiagnosis conflicts with prior knowledge and health messages (information conflict).These different reactions are distinct but correlated and are common reactions when people learn about overdiagnosis.Reactance, disbelief, and source derogation are associated with lower intent to use information about overdiagnosis in decision making as well as the belief that informing people about overdiagnosis is unimportant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Scherer
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- CO Center of Innovation (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Krithika Suresh
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Carmen L Lewis
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joseph N Cappella
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Annenburg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brad Morse
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Channing E Tate
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Bridget S Mosley
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sarah Schmiege
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marilyn M Schapira
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Center for Health Equity Research & Promotion (CHERP), Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith J, Dodd RH, Gainey KM, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J, McCaffery KJ. Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners' Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2998-3020. [PMID: 37142822 PMCID: PMC10593684 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE To examine the factors influencing PCPs' recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer screening for older adults. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Pre-Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, searched from 1 January 2000 to July 2021, and citation searching in July 2022. STUDY SELECTION Assessed factors influencing PCPs' breast, prostate, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening decisions for older adults' (defined either as ≥ 65 years or < 10-year life expectancy). DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently conducted data extraction and quality appraisal. Decisions were crosschecked and discussed where necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS From 1926 records, 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty were quantitative, nine were qualitative, and one used a mixed method design. Twenty-nine were conducted in the USA, and one in the UK. Factors were synthesized into six categories: patient demographic characteristics, patient health characteristics, patient and clinician psycho-social factors, clinician characteristics, and health system factors. Patient preference was most reported as influential across both quantitative and qualitative studies. Age, health status, and life expectancy were also commonly influential, but PCPs held nuanced views about life expectancy. Weighing benefits/harms was also commonly reported with variation across cancer screening types. Other factors included patient screening history, clinician attitudes/personal experiences, patient/provider relationship, guidelines, reminders, and time. LIMITATIONS We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to variability in study designs and measurement. The vast majority of included studies were conducted in the USA. CONCLUSIONS Although PCPs play a role in individualizing cancer screening for older adults, multi-level interventions are needed to improve these decisions. Decision support should continue to be developed and implemented to support informed choice for older adults and assist PCPs to consistently provide evidence-based recommendations. REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021268219. FUNDING SOURCE NHMRC APP1113532.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Rachael H. Dodd
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between Cancer Council NSW and The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Karen M. Gainey
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Centre for Education and Research On Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muscat DM, Thompson R, Cvejic E, Smith J, Chang EHF, Tracy M, Zadro J, Lindner R, McCaffery KJ. Randomized Trial of the Choosing Wisely Consumer Questions and a Shared Decision-Making Video Intervention on Decision-Making Outcomes. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:642-655. [PMID: 37403779 PMCID: PMC10422858 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231184461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite widespread use, there are few studies evaluating the consumer Choosing Wisely questions. METHODS We evaluated the impact of the Choosing Wisely questions on consumers' decision-making outcomes. Adults living in Australia were presented with a hypothetical low-value care scenario. Using a 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design, they were randomized to either the Choosing Wisely questions ("Questions"), a shared decision-making (SDM) preparation video ("Video"), both interventions, or control (no intervention). Primary outcomes were 1) self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making and 2) intention to engage in SDM. RESULTS A total of 1,439 participants (45.6% with "inadequate" health literacy) were eligible and included in the analysis. Intention to engage in SDM was higher in people randomized to the Video (mean difference [MD] = 0.24 [scale 0-6], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14, 0.35), Questions (MD = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.22), and both interventions (MD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44, P < 0.001, d = 0.28) compared with control. Combining interventions had a greater impact than presenting the Questions alone (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.32; P < 0.001). Those who received the Video or both interventions reported lower intention to follow the low-value treatment plan without further questioning (all P < 0.05) and more positive attitudes toward SDM (all P < 0.05) compared with control. Intervention acceptability was high in all study arms (>80%), but proactive access was low (1.7%-20.8%). Compared with control, participants who received one or both interventions asked more questions that mapped to the Choosing Wisely questions (all P < .001). There were no main effects of either intervention on self-efficacy or knowledge. CONCLUSIONS The Choosing Wisely questions and a video to promote SDM may improve intention to engage in SDM and support patients in identifying questions that align with the Choosing Wisely campaign (with some additional benefits of the video intervention). TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR376477. HIGHLIGHTS We conducted a randomized controlled trial online with adults living in Australia to test the effectiveness of the consumer Choosing Wisely questions and a shared decision-making (SDM) preparation video.Both interventions improved intention to engage in SDM and supported participants to identify questions that align with the Choosing Wisely campaign.There were some additional benefits of the Video intervention in reducing willingness to accept low-value treatment for low-back pain without asking questions; however, neither intervention changed participants' self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making nor affected perceptions of preparedness to engage in SDM or knowledge of rights to be involved in health care decision-making.The simple, low-cost nature of the interventions may make them appropriate for implementation within a suite of approaches to address low-value care at a population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Marie Muscat
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenna Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edward Hoi-fan Chang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marguerite Tracy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joshua Zadro
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Health literacy is an important aspect of equitable, safe, and high-quality care. For organizations implementing health literacy initiatives, using 'change champions' appears to be a promising strategy. This systematic review aimed to identify the empirical and conceptual research that exists about health literacy champions. We conducted the systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and PubMed, with additional studies identified by searching references and citations of included studies and reviews of organizational health literacy. Seventeen articles were included in the final review (case studies, n = 9; qualitative research, n = 4; quasi-experimental, n = 2; opinion articles without case studies, n = 2). Using JBI critical appraisal tools, most articles had a high risk of bias. Often champions were not the focus of the article. Champions included staff across frontline, management, and executive levels. Only five studies described training for champions. Key champion activities related to either (i) increasing organizational awareness and commitment to health literacy, or (ii) influencing organizational strategic and operational planning. The most common output was ensuring that the organization's health information materials met health literacy guidelines. Articles recommended engaging multiple champions at varying levels within the organization, including the executive level. Limited funding and resources were key barriers. Two of four articles reported positive impacts of champions on implementation of health literacy initiatives. Overall, few of the articles described health literacy champions in adequate detail. More comprehensive reporting on this implementation strategy and further experimental and process evaluation research are needed to progress this area of research. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022348816).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Zhang
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dana Mouwad
- Health Literacy Hub, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dipti Zachariah
- Multicultural Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Copp T, Thompson R, Doust J, Hammarberg K, Peate M, Lensen S, Cvejic E, Lieberman D, Mol BW, McCaffery KJ. Community awareness and use of anti-Müllerian hormone testing in Australia: a population survey of women. Hum Reprod 2023:7193900. [PMID: 37309652 PMCID: PMC10391311 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) test usage, awareness, and perceived reasons for testing in a representative community sample of women in Australia? SUMMARY ANSWER : Among women aged 18-55 years, 13% had heard about AMH testing and 7% had had an AMH test, with the top three reasons for testing including due to infertility investigations (51%), considering pregnancy and wanting to understand their chances (19%) or to find out if a medical condition had affected fertility (11%). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The growing availability of direct-to-consumer AMH testing has raised concerns about overuse, however as most AMH tests are paid for privately by consumers, data on test usage is not publicly available. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION National cross-sectional survey of 1773 women, conducted in January 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Females aged 18-55 years were recruited from the representative 'Life in Australia' probability-based population panel and completed the survey online or by telephone. Main outcome measures included if and how participants had heard about AMH testing, whether they had ever had an AMH test, main reason for testing and test access. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 2423 women who were invited 1773 responded (73% response rate). Of these, 229 (13%) had heard about AMH testing and 124 (7%) had had an AMH test. Testing rates were highest among those currently aged 35-39 years (14%) and associated with educational attainment. Almost all accessed the test through their general practitioner or fertility specialist. Reasons for testing were: part of an infertility investigation (51%), considering pregnancy and wanting to understand chances of conceiving (19%), finding out if a medical condition had affected fertility (11%), curiosity (9%), considering egg freezing (5%), and considering delaying pregnancy (2%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although the sample was large and mostly representative, it was over-represented by people holding a university degree and under-represented by people aged 18-24, however, we used weighted data where possible to account for this. All data were self-reported so there is a risk of recall bias. The number of survey items was also restricted, so the type of counselling women received prior to testing, reasons for declining an AMH test or test timing were not measured. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Whilst most women reported having an AMH test for appropriate reasons, about one third had it for reasons not supported by evidence. Public and clinician education about the lack of utility of AMH testing for women not undergoing infertility treatment is needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence grant (1104136) and Program grant (1113532). T.C. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leader Research Fellowship (2009419). B.W.M. reports research funding, consultancy and travel support from Merck. D.L. is the Medical Director of City Fertility NSW and reports consultancy for Organon, Ferring, Besins and Merck. The authors have no other competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre of Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Ben W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fossey B, McCaffery KJ, Cvejic E, Jansen J, Copp T. Understanding the Relationship between Illness Perceptions and Health Behaviour among Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20:5998. [PMID: 37297602 PMCID: PMC10252798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20115998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This paper aims to delineate the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to their illness by applying the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) to their health behaviour. An online cross-sectional design was used to examine the relationship between participants' illness perceptions (illness identity, consequence, timeline, control, and cause) and emotional representations of their PCOS, and their health behaviours (diet, physical activity, and risky contraceptive behaviour). The participants were 252 women between the ages of 18 and 45 years, living in Australia, and self-reporting a diagnosis of PCOS, recruited through social media. Participants completed an online questionnaire regarding illness perceptions as well as their diet, physical activity, and risky contraceptive behaviour. Illness identity was positively associated with the number of maladaptive dietary practices (B = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.003, 0.138; p = 0.04), and perception of longer illness duration was associated with reduced physical activity (OR = 0.898, 95% CI: 0.807, 0.999; p = 0.49) and risky contraceptive behaviour (OR = 0.856, 95% CI: 0.736, 0.997; p = 0.045). The limitations of the study include all data being self-reported (including PCOS diagnosis), and the potential for analyses of physical activity and risky contraceptive use being underpowered due to reduced sample sizes. The sample was also highly educated and restricted to those who use social media. These findings suggest that illness perceptions may play a role in influencing health behaviour in women with PCOS. A better understanding of the illness perceptions of women with PCOS is needed to increase health-promoting behaviour and improve health outcomes for women with PCOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Fossey
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Department of Family Medicine, School Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mavragani A, Bonner C, Muscat DM, Dunn AG, Harrison E, Dalmazzo J, Mouwad D, Aslani P, Shepherd HL, McCaffery KJ. Multiple Automated Health Literacy Assessments of Written Health Information: Development of the SHeLL (Sydney Health Literacy Lab) Health Literacy Editor v1. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e40645. [PMID: 36787164 PMCID: PMC9975914 DOI: 10.2196/40645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Producing health information that people can easily understand is challenging and time-consuming. Existing guidance is often subjective and lacks specificity. With advances in software that reads and analyzes text, there is an opportunity to develop tools that provide objective, specific, and automated guidance on the complexity of health information. This paper outlines the development of the SHeLL (Sydney Health Literacy Lab) Health Literacy Editor, an automated tool to facilitate the implementation of health literacy guidelines for the production of easy-to-read written health information. Target users were any person or organization that develops consumer-facing education materials, with or without prior experience with health literacy concepts. Anticipated users included health professionals, staff, and government and nongovernment agencies. To develop this tool, existing health literacy and relevant writing guidelines were collated. Items amenable to programmable automated assessment were incorporated into the Editor. A set of natural language processing methods were also adapted for use in the SHeLL Editor, though the approach was primarily procedural (rule-based). As a result of this process, the Editor comprises 6 assessments: readability (school grade reading score calculated using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG)), complex language (percentage of the text that contains public health thesaurus entries, words that are uncommon in English, or acronyms), passive voice, text structure (eg, use of long paragraphs), lexical density and diversity, and person-centered language. These are presented as global scores, with additional, more specific feedback flagged in the text itself. Feedback is provided in real-time so that users can iteratively revise and improve the text. The design also includes a "text preparation" mode, which allows users to quickly make adjustments to ensure accurate calculation of readability. A hierarchy of assessments also helps users prioritize the most important feedback. Lastly, the Editor has a function that exports the analysis and revised text. The SHeLL Health Literacy Editor is a new tool that can help improve the quality and safety of written health information. It provides objective, immediate feedback on a range of factors, complementing readability with other less widely used but important objective assessments such as complex and person-centered language. It can be used as a scalable intervention to support the uptake of health literacy guidelines by health services and providers of health information. This early prototype can be further refined by expanding the thesaurus and leveraging new machine learning methods for assessing the complexity of the written text. User-testing with health professionals is needed before evaluating the Editor's ability to improve the health literacy of written health information and evaluating its implementation into existing Australian health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adam G Dunn
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eliza Harrison
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason Dalmazzo
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dana Mouwad
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Health Literacy Hub, Sydney, Australia
| | - Parisa Aslani
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gainey KM, Smith J, McCaffery KJ, Clifford S, Muscat DM. What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review. Patient 2023; 16:31-42. [PMID: 36301440 PMCID: PMC9813023 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plain language summaries (PLSs) are intended for a non-expert audience in order to make health research accessible and understandable to the public. This is important because most research is written with jargon and at a high reading level. However, there is a high degree of variability in the instructions for writing PLSs, which may impede their usefulness as a tool for communicating health research to the public. OBJECTIVE The aim of this scoping review was to conduct a detailed analysis of the author instructions for PLSs provided by leading biomedical and health journals. METHOD We screened 534 health journals covering 11 categories selected from the InCites Journal Citation Reports linked to the top 10 non-communicable diseases. We included journals published in English that recommended the inclusion of a PLS (as defined by the National Institute for Health Research) and provided authors with text-based instructions on how it should be written. Two independent reviewers extracted data pertaining to common elements identified in author instructions, such as word count/PLS length, content, structure, purpose, wording to support plain language, and the use of jargon, acronyms and abbreviations. Other aspects of PLSs were recorded, such as the label used (e.g., plain language summary, lay summary, and patient summary), journal publisher, consumer involvement and whether the PLS is optional or mandatory. We recorded the frequency of each element and qualitative details of specific instructions. A consumer representative provided ongoing and iterative feedback on the methods, results, and reporting of this study RESULTS: Despite reviewing 534 journals across 10 non-communicable disease areas and 11 journal categories, we found only 27 (5.1%) contained text-based instructions for PLS. Of the 27 journals included in this review, most (70%) did not require a PLS. Approximately 70% of journals with PLS instructions included advice about the use of jargon, abbreviations, and acronyms. Only one journal recommended the use of a readability tool, however five noted that the reading level of the audience or readability of the PLS should be considered. Author instructions were highly heterogeneous between journals. There was inconsistency regarding the word count/PLS length (e.g., between 100 and 850 words), structure (e.g., paragraphs or bullet points), and varying levels of detail for other elements in the instructions. Although only one journal recommended consumer involvement in the development of PLSs, many recommended authors consult those who are not an expert in their field to review their summary prior to submission. CONCLUSION The development of consistent author instructions could enhance the effectiveness and use of PLSs. Such instructions should be developed with consumers to ensure they met the needs of a lay non-expert audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M. Gainey
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 127A Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Jenna Smith
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 127A Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 127A Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Sharon Clifford
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC Australia
| | - Danielle M. Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 127A Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Smith J, Cvejic E, Lal TJ, Fisher A, Tracy M, McCaffery KJ. Impact of alternative terminology for depression on help-seeking intention: A randomized online trial. J Clin Psychol 2023; 79:68-85. [PMID: 35802773 PMCID: PMC10953448 DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE People with depression experience barriers to seeking professional help. Different diagnostic terminology can influence people's treatment/management preferences. The aim of this study was to investigate how alternative depression diagnostic labels and recommendations impact help-seeking intentions and psychosocial outcomes. METHODS Participants (18-70 years) were recruited using an online panel (Australia) to complete a randomized controlled trial. They read a hypothetical scenario where they discussed experiencing depressive symptoms with their GP and were randomized to receive one of four diagnoses ("depression," "burnout," "functional impairment syndrome" [fictitious label], no label [control]), and one of two follow-up recommendations ("clinical psychologist," "mind coach"). PRIMARY OUTCOME help-seeking intention (5-point scale, higher = greater intention); secondary outcomes: intention to speak to boss, self-stigma, worry, perceived severity, illness perceptions, and personal stigma. RESULTS A total of 676 participants completed the survey. There was no main effect of diagnostic label on help-seeking intention or stigma outcomes. Intention to speak to a boss was higher with the depression compared to burnout label (MD = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.14-0.66) and perceived severity was higher with the depression label compared to control (MD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74) and all other labels. Those who received the "clinical psychologist" recommendation reported higher help-seeking intention (MD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25-0.60) and treatment control (MD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.29-1.10) compared to the "mind coach" recommendation. CONCLUSION Findings highlight the success of efforts to promote help-seeking from clinical psychologists for depression. If burnout is considered a separate diagnostic entity to depression, greater awareness around what such a diagnosis means may be needed. Future research should examine how different terminologies surrounding other mental health conditions impact help-seeking and stigma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tara J. Lal
- University of New EnglandArmidaleNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alana Fisher
- eCentre Clinic, School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marguerite Tracy
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Campbell ZC, Dawson JK, Kirkendall SM, McCaffery KJ, Jansen J, Campbell KL, Lee VW, Webster AC. Interventions for improving health literacy in people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 12:CD012026. [PMID: 36472416 PMCID: PMC9724196 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012026.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low health literacy affects 25% of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with increased morbidity and death. Improving health literacy is a recognised priority, but effective interventions are not clear. OBJECTIVES This review looked the benefits and harms of interventions for improving health literacy in people with CKD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 July 2022 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched MEDLINE (OVID) and EMBASE (OVID) for non-randomised studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies that assessed interventions aimed at improving health literacy in people with CKD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and performed risk of bias analysis. We classified studies as either interventions aimed at improving aspects of health literacy or interventions targeting a population of people with poor health literacy. The interventions were further sub-classified in terms of the type of intervention (educational, self-management training, or educational with self-management training). Results were expressed as mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We identified 120 studies (21,149 participants) which aimed to improve health literacy. There were 107 RCTs and 13 non-randomised studies. No studies targeted low literacy populations. For the RCTs, selection bias was low or unclear in 94% of studies, performance bias was high in 86% of studies, detection bias was high in 86% of studies reporting subjective outcomes and low in 93% of studies reporting objective outcomes. Attrition and other biases were low or unclear in 86% and 78% of studies, respectively. Compared to usual care, low certainty evidence showed educational interventions may increase kidney-related knowledge (14 RCTs, 2632 participants: SMD 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.32; I² = 94%). Data for self-care, self-efficacy, quality of life (QoL), death, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and hospitalisations could not be pooled or was not reported. Compared to usual care, low-certainty evidence showed self-management interventions may improve self-efficacy (5 RCTs, 417 participants: SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.03; I² = 74%) and QoL physical component score (3 RCTs, 131 participants: MD 4.02, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.94; I² = 0%). There was moderate-certainty evidence that self-management interventions probably did not slow the decline in eGFR after one year (3 RCTs, 855 participants: MD 1.53 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -1.41 to 4.46; I² = 33%). Data for knowledge, self-care behaviour, death and hospitalisations could not be pooled or was not reported. Compared to usual care, low-certainty evidence showed educational with self-management interventions may increase knowledge (15 RCTs, 2185 participants: SMD 0.65, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93; I² = 90%), improve self-care behaviour scores (4 RCTs, 913 participants: SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.82; I² =97%), self-efficacy (8 RCTs, 687 participants: SMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.89; I² = 82%), improve QoL physical component score (3 RCTs, 2771 participants: MD 2.56, 95% CI 1.73 to 3.38; I² = 0%) and may make little or no difference to slowing the decline of eGFR (4 RCTs, 618 participants: MD 4.28 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -0.03 to 8.85; I² = 43%). Moderate-certainty evidence shows educational with self-management interventions probably decreases the risk of death (any cause) (4 RCTs, 2801 participants: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02; I² = 0%). Data for hospitalisation could not be pooled. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Interventions to improve aspects of health literacy are a very broad category, including educational interventions, self-management interventions and educational with self-management interventions. Overall, this type of health literacy intervention is probably beneficial in this cohort however, due to methodological limitations and high heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes, the evidence is of low certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe C Campbell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jessica K Dawson
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Family Medicine, School Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Katrina L Campbell
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
| | - Vincent Ws Lee
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Angela C Webster
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Transplant and Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zwi S, Isautier J, Webster AC, Lambert K, Shepherd HL, McCaffery KJ, Sud K, Saunders J, O'Lone E, Liu N, Kim J, Robbins A, Muscat DM. A feasibility study of a best practice health literacy app for Australian adults with chronic kidney disease. PEC Innov 2022; 1:100047. [PMID: 37213763 PMCID: PMC10194182 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective To investigate feasibility of the SUCCESS app; a cross-platform e-health innovation to improve health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making among culturally-diverse Australian haemodialysis patients. Methods Multi-site, pre-post, mixed-methods study. Haemodialysis patients ≥18 years used the app for 12 weeks. Qualitative data from 18 interviews were thematically analysed to evaluate app acceptability. Quantitative analysis using paired sampled t-tests evaluated feasibility outcomes pertaining to recruitment, retention, data collection and app efficacy (including health literacy; decision self-efficacy; quality of life; behaviour; knowledge; confidence). Results We successfully recruited diverse participants (N = 116; 45% born overseas; 40% low/moderate health literacy) from four Local Health Districts in Sydney, Australia. However, only 61 participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Qualitative analyses provided insights into acceptability and user engagement. Quantitative analyses showed significant improvements on the health literacy domain 'Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers' (Mean Difference [MD] = 0.2 on a 5-point scale; CI95%: 0.0-0.4; p = 0.03) and decision self-efficacy (MD = 4.3 on a 10-point scale; CI95%: 0.6-7.9; p = 0.02) after 12 weeks app use. Conclusions The SUCCESS app was feasible and acceptable to participants. The app will be adapted to facilitate ongoing use and engagement among diverse haemodialysis patients. Innovation This is the first health literacy-informed app to promote active participation in haemodialysis self-management and decision-making, tailored toward culturally-diverse and low health literacy groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Zwi
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Angela C. Webster
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Kelly Lambert
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kamal Sud
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - John Saunders
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma O'Lone
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - Na Liu
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jinman Kim
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Telehealth and Technology Centre, Nepean Hospital, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Room 127A, Edward Ford Building (A27), The University of Sydney, 2006 New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ayre J, Jenkins H, McCaffery KJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. Physiotherapists have some hesitations and unmet needs regarding delivery of exercise programs for low back pain prevention in adults: A qualitative interview study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102630. [PMID: 35932753 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there is some qualitative research on physiotherapists' experiences of delivering low back pain treatment, we do not know the extent that these findings apply to low back pain prevention. OBJECTIVE To explore physiotherapists' understanding, attitudes and experiences related to delivering low back pain prevention programs. DESIGN Qualitative interview study. METHOD Interviews from 25 Australian physiotherapists (56% female; 44% male) were analysed using framework thematic analysis. RESULTS Theme 1 explored physiotherapists' hesitancy about 'low back pain prevention,' raising concerns this term might inadvertently entrench unhelpful beliefs. They preferred language about minimising the risk and impact of recurrences, and promoting an active lifestyle. Theme 2 emphasised that as pain receded, engaging patients could be challenging. Some discussed that person-centred care and individualised programs helped overcome this challenge. Several wanted more training in counselling skills, and more consistent external messaging about low back pain prevention. Theme 3 highlighted uncertainty about delivering high-value prevention care. Some perceived the programs as potentially placing unnecessary financial burden on some patients. Many physiotherapists were uncertain about how to support patients when they weren't in pain (i.e., remission) and wanted training in tailored exercise prescription. CONCLUSIONS Many of the physiotherapists had some hesitations and unmet needs regarding delivery of exercise programs for secondary prevention of low back pain. Clinicians may find it useful to ask patients directly about their interest in prevention programs and work with interested patients to develop tailored, progressive programs that continue to be motivating, even during periods when there is no pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Hazel Jenkins
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smith J, Dodd RH, Wallis KA, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J, McCaffery KJ. General practitioners' views and experiences of communicating with older people about cancer screening: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2022:cmac126. [PMID: 36334011 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults should be supported to make informed decisions about cancer screening. However, it is unknown how general practitioners (GPs) in Australia communicate about cancer screening with older people. AIM To investigate GPs' views and experiences of communicating about cancer screening (breast, cervical, prostate, and bowel) with older people (≥70 years). DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, Australia. METHOD Interviews were conducted with GPs practising in Australia (n = 28), recruited through practice-based research networks, primary health networks, social media, and email invitation. Interviews were audio-recorded and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Findings across GPs were organized into 3 themes: (i) varied motivation to initiate cancer screening discussions; some GPs reported that they only initiated screening within recommended ages (<75 years), others described initiating discussions beyond recommended ages, and some experienced older patient-initiated discussions; (ii) GPs described the role they played in providing screening information, whereby detailed discussions about the benefits/risks of prostate screening were more likely than other nationally funded screening types (breast, cervical, and bowel); however, some GPs had limited knowledge of recommendations and found it challenging to explain why screening recommendations have upper ages; (iii) GPs reported providing tailored advice and discussion based on personal patient preferences, overall health/function, risk of cancer, and previous screening. CONCLUSIONS Strategies to support conversations between GPs and older people about the potential benefits and harms of screening in older age and rationale for upper age limits to screening programmes may be helpful. Further research in this area is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katharine A Wallis
- General Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O’Connor DA, Glasziou P, Maher CG, McCaffery KJ, Schram D, Maguire B, Ma R, Billot L, Gorelik A, Traeger AC, Albarqouni L, Checketts J, Vyas P, Clark B, Buchbinder R. Effect of an Individualized Audit and Feedback Intervention on Rates of Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Imaging Requests by Australian General Practitioners: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 328:850-860. [PMID: 36066518 PMCID: PMC9449798 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.14587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Audit and feedback can improve professional practice, but few trials have evaluated its effectiveness in reducing potential overuse of musculoskeletal diagnostic imaging in general practice. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of audit and feedback for reducing musculoskeletal imaging by high-requesting Australian general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This factorial cluster-randomized clinical trial included 2271 general practices with at least 1 GP who was in the top 20% of referrers for 11 imaging tests (of the lumbosacral or cervical spine, shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle/hind foot) and for at least 4 individual tests between January and December 2018. Only high-requesting GPs within participating practices were included. The trial was conducted between November 2019 and May 2021, with final follow-up on May 8, 2021. INTERVENTIONS Eligible practices were randomized in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 4 different individualized written audit and feedback interventions (n = 3055 GPs) that varied factorially by (1) frequency of feedback (once vs twice) and (2) visual display (standard vs enhanced display highlighting highly requested tests) or to a control condition of no intervention (n = 764 GPs). Participants were not masked. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the overall rate of requests for the 11 targeted imaging tests per 1000 patient consultations over 12 months, assessed using routinely collected administrative data. Primary analyses included all randomized GPs who had at least 1 patient consultation during the study period and were performed by statisticians masked to group allocation. RESULTS A total of 3819 high-requesting GPs from 2271 practices were randomized, and 3660 GPs (95.8%; n = 727 control, n = 2933 intervention) were included in the primary analysis. Audit and feedback led to a statistically significant reduction in the overall rate of imaging requests per 1000 consultations compared with control over 12 months (adjusted mean, 27.7 [95% CI, 27.5-28.0] vs 30.4 [95% CI, 29.8-30.9], respectively; adjusted mean difference, -2.66 [95% CI, -3.24 to -2.07]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among Australian general practitioners known to frequently request musculoskeletal diagnostic imaging, an individualized audit and feedback intervention, compared with no intervention, significantly decreased the rate of targeted musculoskeletal imaging tests ordered over 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12619001503112.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise A. O’Connor
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Glasziou
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher G. Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dina Schram
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Brigit Maguire
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Robert Ma
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Laurent Billot
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Gorelik
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adrian C. Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Juliet Checketts
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Parima Vyas
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Brett Clark
- Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ayre J, Muscat DM, Mac O, Batcup C, Cvejic E, Pickles K, Dolan H, Bonner C, Mouwad D, Zachariah D, Turalic U, Santalucia Y, Chen T, Vasic G, McCaffery KJ. Main COVID-19 information sources in a culturally and linguistically diverse community in Sydney, Australia: A cross-sectional survey. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:2793-2800. [PMID: 35369997 PMCID: PMC8966120 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe COVID-19 information-seeking experiences for culturally and linguistically diverse groups in Sydney, Australia. METHODS Cross-sectional survey, translated into 11 languages; participants recruited from March 21 to July 9, 2021. Regression models identified factors associated with difficulty finding easy-to-understand COVID-19 information. RESULTS Across 708 participants (88% born overseas, 31% poor English proficiency), difficulty finding easy-to-understand COVID-19 information was rated 4.13 for English (95%CI: 3.85-4.41) and 4.36 for non-English language materials (95%CI: 4.07-4.66) (1 easy to 10 hard). Participants who were older (p < 0.001), had inadequate health literacy (p < 0.001), or poor English proficiency (p < 0.001) found it harder to find easy-to-understand English-language COVID-19 information. Those who had greater difficulty finding easy-to-understand non-English COVID-19 information were younger (p = 0.004), had poor English proficiency (p < 0.001), were university-educated (p = 0.05), and had spent longer living in Australia (p = 0.001). They were more likely to rely on friends and family for COVID-19 information (p = 0.02). There was significant variation in information-seeking experiences across language groups (p's < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Easy-to-understand and accessible COVID-19 information is needed to meet the needs of people in culturally and linguistically diverse communities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS COVID-19 communication efforts must involve working alongside these communities to leverage existing communication channels and tailor messages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ayre
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia.
| | - D M Muscat
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - O Mac
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Batcup
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - E Cvejic
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Pickles
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - H Dolan
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Bonner
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Mouwad
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, Australia
| | - D Zachariah
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, Australia
| | - U Turalic
- Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Kingswood, Australia
| | - Y Santalucia
- South Western Sydney Local Health District, Fairfield, Australia
| | - T Chen
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, Australia
| | - G Vasic
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, Australia
| | - K J McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ayre J, Jenkins H, McCaffery KJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. Unique considerations for exercise programs to prevent future low back pain: the patient perspective. Pain 2022; 163:e953-e962. [PMID: 34799535 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is moderate quality evidence that exercise can help to prevent future low back pain (LBP). This study aimed to explore patient needs and preferences for exercise programs to prevent LBP and the outcomes of these programs that would be most important to a patient. Researchers conducted 26 semistructured interviews with people with LBP. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using framework thematic analysis. Three themes were developed. Theme 1 emphasised that everyone's LBP was different, translating to preferences for tailored prevention programs with a high level of initial supervision and individualised biomedical explanations for the program. Theme 2 highlighted important outcomes. Pain was considered not only for intensity but also for the duration, frequency, and severity of flare-ups or episodes. Other important outcomes were general fitness and capacity to engage in everyday activities, social interactions, and work. Theme 3 outlined aspects of exercise programs that were considered important for people with fluctuating pain, including how to foster a sense of "progress," set realistic expectations, and support patients to establish exercise routines that can adapt to fluctuating pain. Theme 4 discussed participants' desire for social connection. Patients want exercise programs for LBP prevention, which are highly individualised, provide meaningful explanations of exercises, and help them maintain exercise in the long-term. Clinicians should discuss with patients the transition from a focus on treatment to the prevention of LBP. This provides greater opportunity to adjust goals and expectations and provide relevant education. Balancing the need for individualised care against affordability presents an ongoing challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hazel Jenkins
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Copp T, Dakin T, Nickel B, Albarqouni L, Mannix L, McCaffery KJ, Barratt A, Moynihan R. Interventions to improve media coverage of medical research: a codesigned feasibility and acceptability study with Australian journalists. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062706. [PMID: 35715183 PMCID: PMC9207948 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although the media can influence public perceptions and utilisation of healthcare, journalists generally receive no routine training in interpreting and reporting on medical research. Given growing evidence about the problems of medical overuse, the need for quality media reporting has become a greater priority. This study aimed to codesign and assess the feasibility of a multicomponent training intervention for journalists in Australia. DESIGN A small pragmatic feasibility study using a pre- and postdesign. SETTING 90 min online workshop. PARTICIPANTS Eight journalists currently working in Australia, recruited through the study's journalist advisor and existing contacts of the researchers. INTERVENTION The training intervention covered a range of topics, including study designs, conflicts of interest, misleading medical statistics, population screening and overdiagnosis. The intervention also provided tools to help journalists with reporting, including a Tip Sheet and list of expert contacts in health and medicine. Preworkshop and postworkshop questionnaires were administered via Qualtrics. MEASURES Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, and journalists' knowledge of overdiagnosis and common issues with health stories. Quantitative results were analysed descriptively using SPSS. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. RESULTS All participants completed preworkshop and postworkshop questionnaires, and 6 completed the 6-week follow-up (75% retention). Feasibility findings suggest the intervention is acceptable and relevant to journalists, with participants indicating the workshop increased confidence with reporting on medical research. We observed increases in knowledge preworkshop to postworkshop for all knowledge measures on overdiagnosis and common issues with media coverage of medicine. Analysis of free-text responses identified several areas for improvement, such as including more examples to aid understanding of the counterintuitive topic of overdiagnosis and more time for discussion. CONCLUSIONS Piloting suggested the multicomponent training intervention is acceptable to journalists and provided important feedback and insights to inform a future trial of the intervention's impact on media coverage of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Wiser Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Wiser Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Muscat DM, Ayre J, Mac O, Batcup C, Cvejic E, Pickles K, Dolan H, Bonner C, Mouwad D, Zachariah D, Turalic U, Santalucia Y, Chen T, Vasic G, McCaffery KJ. Psychological, social and financial impacts of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Sydney, Australia. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058323. [PMID: 35537788 PMCID: PMC9091490 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the psychological, social and financial outcomes of COVID-19-and the sociodemographic predictors of those outcomes-among culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Sydney, Australia. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey informed by the Framework for Culturally Competent Health Research conducted between March and July 2021. SETTING Participants who primarily speak a language other than English at home were recruited from Greater Western Sydney, New South Wales. PARTICIPANTS 708 community members (mean age: 45.4 years (range 18-91)). 88% (n=622) were born outside of Australia, 31% (n=220) did not speak English well or at all, and 41% (n=290) had inadequate health literacy. OUTCOME MEASURES Thirteen items regarding COVID-19-related psychological, social and financial outcomes were adapted from validated scales, previous surveys or co-designed in partnership with Multicultural Health and interpreter service staff. Logistic regression models (using poststratification weighted frequencies) were used to identify sociodemographic predictors of outcomes. Surveys were available in English or translated (11 languages). RESULTS In this analysis, conducted prior to the 2021 COVID-19 outbreak in Sydney, 25% of the sample reported feeling nervous or stressed most/all of the time and 22% felt lonely or alone most/all of the time. A quarter of participants reported negative impacts on their spousal relationships as a result of COVID-19 and most parents reported that their children were less active (64%), had more screen time (63%) and were finding school harder (45%). Mean financial burden was 2.9/5 (95% CI 2.8 to 2.9). Regression analyses consistently showed more negative outcomes for those with comorbidities and differences across language groups. CONCLUSION Culturally and linguistically diverse communities experience significant psychological, social and financial impacts of COVID-19. A whole-of-government approach is needed to support rapid co-design of culturally safe support packages in response to COVID-19 and other national health emergencies, tailored appropriately to specific language groups and accounting for pre-existing health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olivia Mac
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hankiz Dolan
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dana Mouwad
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dipti Zachariah
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Una Turalic
- Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Santalucia
- South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tingting Chen
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gordana Vasic
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dodd RH, Pickles K, Cvejic E, Cornell S, Isautier JMJ, Copp T, Nickel B, Bonner C, Batcup C, Muscat DM, Ayre J, McCaffery KJ. Perceived public health threat a key factor for willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine in Australia. Vaccine 2022; 40:2484-2490. [PMID: 34391594 PMCID: PMC8339499 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination rollout against COVID-19 is underway across multiple countries worldwide. Although the vaccine is free, rollout might still be compromised by hesitancy or concerns about COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS We conducted two online surveys of Australian adults in April (during national lockdown; convenience cross-sectional sample) and November (very few cases of COVID-19; nationally representative sample) 2020, prior to vaccine rollout. We asked about intentions to have a potential COVID-19 vaccine (If a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available, I will get it) and free-text responses (November only). RESULTS After adjustment for differences in sample demographics, the estimated proportion agreeing to a COVID-19 vaccine if it became available in April (n = 1146) was 76.3%. In November (n = 1941) this was estimated at 71.5% of the sample; additional analyses identified that the variation was driven by differences in perceived public health threat between April and November. Across both surveys, female gender, being younger, having inadequate health literacy and lower education were associated with reluctance to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Lower perceived susceptibility to COVID-19, belief that data on the efficacy of vaccines is 'largely made up', having lower confidence in government, and lower perception of COVID-19 as a public health threat, were also associated with reluctance to be vaccinated against COVID-19. The top three reasons for agreeing to vaccinate (November only) were to protect myself and others, moral responsibility, and having no reason not to get it. For those who were indifferent or disagreeing to vaccinate, safety concerns were the top reason, followed by indecision and lack of trust in the vaccine respectively. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight some factors related to willingness to accept a COVID-19 vaccine prior to one being available in Australia. Now that the vaccine is being offered, this study identifies key issues that can inform public health messaging to address vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Samuel Cornell
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jennifer M J Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cornell S, Nickel B, Cvejic E, Bonner C, McCaffery KJ, Ayre J, Copp T, Batcup C, Isautier J, Dakin T, Dodd R. Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Health Promot J Austr 2022; 33:311-319. [PMID: 33864299 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.1494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED To investigate whether Australians have experienced any positive effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS National online longitudinal survey. As part of a June 2020 survey, participants (n = 1370) were asked 'In your life, have you experienced any positive effects from the COVID-19 pandemic' (yes/no) and also completed the World Health Organisation-Five well-being index. Differences were explored by demographic variables. Free-text responses were thematically coded. RESULTS Nine hundred sixty participants (70%) reported experiencing at least one positive effect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Living with others (P = .045) and employment situation (P < .001) at baseline (April) were associated with experiencing positive effects. Individuals working for pay from home were more likely to experience positive effects compared to those who were not working for pay (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.63, P < .001) or who were working for pay outside the home (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.58, P < .001). 54.2% of participants reported a sufficient level of well-being, 23.2% low well-being and a further 22.6% very low well-being. Of those experiencing positive effects, 945/960 (98%) provided an explanation. The three most common themes were 'Family time' (33%), 'Work flexibility' (29%) and 'Calmer life' (19%). CONCLUSIONS A large proportion of participants reported positive effects resulting from changes to daily life due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. SO WHAT The needs of people living alone, and of those having to work outside the home or who are unemployed, should be considered by health policymakers and employers in future pandemic preparedness efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Cornell
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Copp T, Muscat DM, Hersch J, McCaffery KJ, Doust J, Dokras A, Mol BW, Jansen J. The challenges with managing polycystic ovary syndrome: A qualitative study of women's and clinicians' experiences. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:719-725. [PMID: 34099308 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore clinicians' and women's views and experiences with managing polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS Semi-structured interviews with 36 clinicians and 26 women with PCOS. Clinicians were recruited through advertising via relevant professional organisations, snowballing and contacting clinics across Australia. Women with PCOS were recruited through social media advertising. Transcribed audio-recordings were analysed thematically using Framework analysis. RESULTS Findings across women with PCOS and clinician interviews were organised into three themes. Both women and clinicians experienced 1) challenges with managing PCOS, often stemming from the disparate and wide spectrum of presentations, issues with current treatment options (including limited evidence) and the long-term nature of management. Both spoke about 2) online information about PCOS and alternative treatments, including lack of relevant information and widespread misinformation. 3) Follow-up and continuity of care, where we found notable differences between women's and clinicians' expectations. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to explore both clinicians' and women's experiences with managing PCOS, illustrating several challenges in managing this heterogeneous condition. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clarifying and addressing patient expectations, providing personalised counselling and information according to PCOS phenotype and a multidisciplinary approach may reduce uncertainty and improve patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia.
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 4006, Australia
| | - Anuja Dokras
- Penn PCOS Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA
| | - Ben W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chadwick V, Bennett KF, McCaffery KJ, Brotherton JML, Dodd RH. Psychosocial impact of testing HPV positive in Australia’s HPV‐based cervical screening program: a cross‐sectional survey. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1110-1119. [PMID: 35128756 PMCID: PMC9546150 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective To examine the impact of self‐reported human papillomavirus (HPV) test result (HPV negative, HPV positive, HPV result unknown) on a range of psychosocial outcomes. Methods Women and other people with a cervix in Australia aged 25–74 years who reported having participated in cervical screening since December 2017 were recruited through Facebook and Instagram to complete an online survey. The primary outcome measures were anxiety, emotional distress, and general distress. Results Nine hundred fifteen participants completed the online survey; 73.2% reported testing HPV negative (‘HPV−’), 15% reported testing HPV positive (‘HPV+’) and 11.8% reported that they did not know/remember their test result (‘HPV unknown’). Compared to participants testing HPV−, participants testing HPV+ had higher mean anxiety (41.67 vs. 37.08, p < 0.001) and emotional distress scores (11.88 vs. 7.71, p < 0.001). Concern about test result (34.3% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001), perceived risk compared to average women (55.4% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), and cancer worry (27.8% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.001) were also greater among HPV+ participants than participants testing HPV−. Participants testing HPV+ felt less reassured about their screening result than participants testing HPV− (16% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.001). Participants testing HPV+ had greater knowledge of HPV (11.96 vs. 10.36 out of 16, p < 0.001) and HPV testing (3.94 vs 3.28 out of 5, p < 0.001) than participants who reported testing HPV−. Conclusions Elevated levels of anxiety and emotional distress were found in those testing HPV+ compared with those testing HPV−. Future research should examine what strategies should be used to deliver test results and what additional information is provided, in order to alleviate anxiety among individuals testing HPV+. Anxiety and emotional distress are significantly greater in individuals who report testing human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) is high in individuals who report testing HPV+, but there are still some significant knowledge gaps Future research is needed to examine how individuals should best receive HPV test results, and what resources should be provided
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kirsty F Bennett
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health Cancer Communication and Screening Group University College London London UK
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- School of Public Health The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health NSW2006 Australia
| | - Julia ML Brotherton
- VCS Population Health VCS Foundation Level 6, 176 Wellington Parade East Melbourne VIC3002 Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- School of Public Health The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health NSW2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Smith J, Dodd RH, Hersch J, McCaffery KJ, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J. Psychosocial and clinical predictors of continued cancer screening in older adults. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:3093-3096. [PMID: 33962825 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many older adults (aged 75+) continue cancer screening despite guidelines suggesting they should not. Using mixed-methods, we examined psychosocial and clinical factors associated with continued breast/prostate screening. METHODS We conducted an online, scenario-based, randomized study in Australia with participants aged 65+ years. The primary outcome was screening intention (10-point scale, dichotomized: low (1-5) and high (6-10)). We also measured demographic, psychosocial, and age-related clinical variables. Participants provided reason/s for their screening intentions in free-text. RESULTS 271 eligible participants completed the survey (aged 65-90 years, 71% adequate health literacy). Those who reported higher cancer anxiety, were men, screened more recently, had family history of breast/prostate cancer and were independent in activities of daily living, were more likely to intend to continue screening. Commonly reported reasons for intending to continue screening were grouped into six themes: routine adherence, the value of knowing, positive screening attitudes, perceived susceptibility, benefits focus, and needing reassurance. CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial factors may drive continued cancer screening in older adults and undermine efforts to promote informed decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS When communicating benefits and harms of cancer screening to older adults, both clinical and psychosocial factors should be discussed to support informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Smith J, Dodd RH, Gainey KM, Naganathan V, Cvejic E, Jansen J, McCaffery KJ. Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults' Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2133406. [PMID: 34748004 PMCID: PMC8576581 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not; furthermore, many older adults have limited knowledge of the potential harms of continuing to be screened. OBJECTIVE To summarize the patient-reported factors associated with older adults' decisions regarding screening for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW Studies were identified by searching databases from January 2000 to June 2020 and were independently assessed for inclusion by 2 authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and then all decisions were cross-checked and discussed where necessary. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2020. FINDINGS The search yielded 2475 records, of which 21 unique studies were included. Nine studies were quantitative, 8 were qualitative, and 4 used mixed method designs. Of the 21 studies, 17 were conducted in the US, and 10 of 21 assessed breast cancer screening decisions only. Factors associated with decision-making were synthesized into 5 categories: demographic, health and clinical, psychological, physician, and social and system. Commonly identified factors associated with the decision to undergo screening included personal or family history of cancer, positive screening attitudes, routine or habit, to gain knowledge, friends, and a physician's recommendation. Factors associated with the decision to forgo screening included being older, negative screening attitudes, and desire not to know about cancer. Some factors had varying associations, including insurance coverage, living in a nursing home, prior screening experience, health problems, limited life expectancy, perceived cancer risk, risks of screening, family, and a physician's recommendation to stop. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although guidelines suggest incorporating life expectancy and health status to inform older adults' cancer screening decisions, older adults' ingrained beliefs about screening may run counter to these concepts. Communication strategies are needed that support older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions by addressing underlying screening beliefs in context with their perceived and actual risk of developing cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael H. Dodd
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen M. Gainey
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mac OA, Muscat DM, Ayre J, Patel P, McCaffery KJ. The readability of official public health information on COVID-19. Med J Aust 2021; 215:373-375. [PMID: 34580878 PMCID: PMC8661844 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
32
|
Muscat DM, Ayre J, Nutbeam D, Harris A, Tunchon L, Zachariah D, McCaffery KJ. Using Feasibility Data and Codesign to Refine a Group-Based Health Literacy Intervention for New Parents. Health Lit Res Pract 2021; 5:e276-e282. [PMID: 34617839 PMCID: PMC8499357 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20210911-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Few health literacy interventions exist for new parents. We developed a group-based health literacy program (“Parenting Plus”), which was initially tested in a feasibility study in 2018. In this brief report, we describe how feasibility findings were incorporated into the Parenting Plus program. Using a codesign process with patient partners (feasibility study participants) and health staff to revise the program, version 2 was tested in a single-site pilot using pre- and post-intervention testing. Parents older than age 16 years whose child was between ages 4 and 26 weeks were recruited from nurse home visits in western Sydney, Australia. Interested participants attended the free 4-week health literacy program (four 2-hour sessions) delivered by a trained facilitator. Piloting suggested the revised program is acceptable to new parents, has good retention (93% over the course of 4 weeks), and can improve health literacy skills, including access to reliable health information and services. Our iterative development and codesign approach integrated learnings from various sources to inform the design of an evidence-based health literacy intervention. We now move to an effectiveness implementation hybrid trial to test intervention effectiveness (health literacy skill development) and support translation of research findings into routine practice. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(4):e276–e282.]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M. Muscat
- Address correspondence to Danielle M. Muscat, PhD, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, 2006, New South Wales, Australia;
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pickles K, Scherer LD, Cvejic E, Hersch J, Barratt A, McCaffery KJ. Preferences for More or Less Health Care and Association With Health Literacy of Men Eligible for Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Australia. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2128380. [PMID: 34636915 PMCID: PMC8511975 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Understanding personal factors that influence diverse responses to health care information, such as preferences for more or less health care, might be beneficial to more effective communication and better involvement in health care choices. OBJECTIVE To determine whether individuals' preferences for more or less health care are associated with informed choice and understanding of overdiagnosis in routine prostate cancer screening and to examine associations among preferences, educational status, and health literacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This survey study included a community-based sample of men in Australia aged 45 to 60 years eligible for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, recruited via an international social research company. Survey data were collected online from June 27 to July 26, 2018. Data were analyzed in April 2020. EXPOSURES Participants were randomized to 1 of 2 versions of an online decision aid (full-length or abbreviated) about PSA screening and completed an online survey that included a measure of preference for more or less health care, the Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale (MMS), in which higher score indicates preference for more health care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was informed choice; knowledge, attitudes, and intentions about screening for prostate cancer were also measured. RESULTS Of 3722 participants who began the survey, 2993 (80.4%) completed it (mean [SD] age, 52.15 [6.65] years). Stronger preferences for more heath care were observed in those without tertiary education (mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09-0.22; P < .001) and with inadequate health literacy (mean difference, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09-0.22; P < .001). After controlling for health and demographic variables, a 1-unit increase in MMS score was associated with reduced relative risk (RR) of making an informed choice (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82; P < .001) and of having adequate conceptual knowledge (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90; P < .001), correct numerical knowledge (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97; P = .001), and correct understanding of overdiagnosis (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90; P < .001). A 1-unit increase in MMS score was associated with a more positive attitude toward screening (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.15-1.21; P < .001) and more positive intention to screen (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.25; P < .001) after adjusting for control variables. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This survey study examined associations between preferences for more or less health care and knowledge about overdiagnosis and informed choice among men in Australia. These results may motivate clinicians to elicit individual patient preferences to facilitate tailored discussions with patients about low-value care, such as prostate cancer screening, for which benefit is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Pickles
- University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Laura D. Scherer
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- VA Denver Center for Innovation, Denver, Colorado
| | - Erin Cvejic
- University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Muscat DM, Costa DSJ, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ, Ayre J. Developing performance-based measures of health literacy: A narrative case study and checklist of considerations. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:2406-2411. [PMID: 34144857 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Research in health literacy is fundamentally impacted by our ability to adequately assess the construct. Although various measures of health literacy have been developed, there are few reflective discussions of the challenges and learnings from the instrument development process. This is somewhat surprising given that health literacy is a multi-dimensional and contested concept (with inherent measurement challenges), and that there are important practical considerations owing to the fact that people completing health literacy assessments may have lower general literacy (i.e. ability to read and write) and English-language skills. This paper discusses our learnings from developing a performance-based measure of parenting health literacy skills (the Parenting Plus Skills Index). The performance-based instrument is characterised by its grounding in health literacy as asset, with items spanning Nutbeam's functional, communicative and critical health literacy skills, and was designed chiefly to capture improvements resulting from health literacy skills training. This paper elucidates critical junctures in the development process, particularly regarding the conceptualisation and operationalisation of the construct. We also outline our approach to addressing practical measurement issues (e.g. administration time; item difficulty). In summarising these, we offer a 13-item checklist to inform the development of health literacy instruments for other health contexts or health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Daniel S J Costa
- Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Short Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Copp T, Isautier JMJ, Nickel B, Pickles K, Tracy M, Doust J, Bonner C, Dodd RH, Ayre J, Cvejic E, Trevena L, Manocha R, McCaffery KJ. COVID-19 challenges faced by general practitioners in Australia: a survey study conducted in March 2021. Aust J Prim Health 2021; 27:357-363. [PMID: 34586061 DOI: 10.1071/py21165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Limited studies at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic found GPs have been negatively affected by increased workload, reduced income and major concerns about staff and patient safety. This study aimed to investigate the challenges of COVID-19 in general practice 1 year since it was declared a pandemic. A national cross-sectional online survey was conducted in March 2021 of a convenience sample of 295 Australian GPs attending an online educational webcast. Twenty-five multipart and free-text questions collected information regarding GPs' main COVID-19-related issues and concerns, including COVID-19 vaccines, useful sources of information, information needs and their perceived role as GPs in COVID-19 management. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all quantitative variables. Content analysis was used to analyse text data from open-ended questions. Of the 596 eligible attendees of the online educational webcast, 295 completed the survey (49.5% response rate). One year since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, GPs still have concerns regarding patients ignoring prescreening and presenting with flu-like symptoms, the safety of their colleagues and family and catching COVID-19 themselves, as well as concerns about the effect of the pandemic on their patients and patients delaying essential care for non-COVID-19 conditions. More education and resources about vaccines was identified as the top information need, which will assist with what GPs' perceived to be their key roles in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, namely educating the public, correcting misunderstandings and providing the COVID-19 vaccine. These findings highlight gaps in communication and information, particularly regarding COVID-19 vaccines. GPs need high-quality information and resources to support them in undertaking complex risk communication with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Jennifer M J Isautier
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Marguerite Tracy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Smith J, Ayre J, Jansen J, Cvejic E, McCaffery KJ, Doust J, Copp T. Impact of diagnostic labels and causal explanations for weight gain on diet intentions, cognitions and emotions: An experimental online study. Appetite 2021; 167:105612. [PMID: 34324910 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Disease labels and causal explanations for certain symptoms or conditions have been found to have both positive and negative outcomes. For example, a diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome could conceivably motivate a person to engage in weight management, which is the recommended first line treatment. Furthermore, doctors may feel more comfortable discussing weight when linked to a medical condition. However, such a diagnosis may elicit feelings of increased anxiety, perceived severity and reduced sense of control. Mixed findings are also evident for impacts of genetic explanations on psychosocial outcomes and behaviours. Using hypothetical scenarios presented in an online survey, participants were asked to imagine that they were visiting their general practitioner due to experiencing weight gain, irregular periods, and more pimples than usual. Participants were randomised to receive different diagnostic labels ('polycystic ovary syndrome', 'weight' or no label/description) and causal explanations (genetic or environmental) for their symptoms. Primary outcomes assessed included intention to eat a healthier diet and perceived personal control of weight (average score on scale 1-7 across 3 items). Secondary outcomes included weight stigma, blameworthiness, worry, perceived severity, self-esteem, belief diet will reduce risks and menu item choice. Participants were 545 females aged 18-45 years (mean = 33 years), living in Australia, recruited through a national online recruitment panel. The sample was overweight on average (BMI = 26.5). Participants reporting a PCOS diagnosis were excluded from analyses. We found no main effects of the label or explanation on intention to eat healthier or perceived personal control of weight. For secondary outcomes, those given the genetic explanation reported higher weight stigma (range 1-7; MD = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.011,0.522), greater worry (range 1-7; MD = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.037,0.496), lower self-esteem (range 10-40; MD = 1.26, 95%CI: 0.28 to 2.24) and perceived their weight as more severe (range 1-7; MD = 0.28; 95%CI: 0.05,0.52) than those given the environmental explanation, averaged over disease label given. These findings further highlight the deleterious effects of genetic explanations on psychosocial outcomes and reinforce the need for caution when communicating the aetiology of weight-related health issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 4006, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cornell S, Nickel B, Cvejic E, Bonner C, McCaffery KJ, Ayre J, Copp T, Batcup C, Isautier J, Dakin T, Dodd R. Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Health Promot J Austr 2021; 33:311-319. [PMID: 33864299 PMCID: PMC8250613 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED To investigate whether Australians have experienced any positive effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS National online longitudinal survey. As part of a June 2020 survey, participants (n = 1370) were asked 'In your life, have you experienced any positive effects from the COVID-19 pandemic' (yes/no) and also completed the World Health Organisation-Five well-being index. Differences were explored by demographic variables. Free-text responses were thematically coded. RESULTS Nine hundred sixty participants (70%) reported experiencing at least one positive effect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Living with others (P = .045) and employment situation (P < .001) at baseline (April) were associated with experiencing positive effects. Individuals working for pay from home were more likely to experience positive effects compared to those who were not working for pay (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.63, P < .001) or who were working for pay outside the home (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.58, P < .001). 54.2% of participants reported a sufficient level of well-being, 23.2% low well-being and a further 22.6% very low well-being. Of those experiencing positive effects, 945/960 (98%) provided an explanation. The three most common themes were 'Family time' (33%), 'Work flexibility' (29%) and 'Calmer life' (19%). CONCLUSIONS A large proportion of participants reported positive effects resulting from changes to daily life due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. SO WHAT The needs of people living alone, and of those having to work outside the home or who are unemployed, should be considered by health policymakers and employers in future pandemic preparedness efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Cornell
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dodd RH, Cvejic E, Bonner C, Pickles K, McCaffery KJ. Willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Australia. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21:318-319. [PMID: 32619436 PMCID: PMC7326391 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30559-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Nutbeam D, Trevena L, McCaffery KJ. Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:521-524. [PMID: 32472490 PMCID: PMC7878628 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Research into health literacy and shared decision-making has largely developed along parallel, but distinct lines over the past two decades. There is little evidence that the concepts and related practice have intersected except in the most functional way, for example, to simplify shared decision-making tools by improving readability scores of decision aids. This paper presents an integrated model to strengthen and sustain patient engagement in health care by drawing on the strengths of both concepts. This includes addressing patients' skills and capacities, alongside modifications to written and verbal information. We propose an expanded model of shared decision-making which incorporates health literacy concepts and promotes two-tiered intervention methods to improve the targeting and personalization of communication and support the development of transferable health literacy skills among patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Obermair HM, Bennett KF, Brotherton JML, Smith MA, McCaffery KJ, Dodd RH. Australian National Cervical Screening Program renewal: Attitudes and experiences of general practitioners, and obstetricians and gynaecologists. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61:416-423. [PMID: 33512715 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the Australian National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) implemented five-yearly primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for women aged 25-74. It is important that clinicians are able to explain the NCSP changes to women and confidently address concerns. AIMS This study examined Australian clinicians' attitudes toward and experiences of the NCSP renewal since its implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cross-sectional survey of clinicians (general practitioners, obstetricians and gynaecologists) involved in cervical screening, distributed two years after implementation of the renewed NCSP. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS Six hundred and seven participants completed the survey. More than 80% of clinicians were comfortable with the main NCSP changes: extended screening intervals, increased age of first screening, and screening test used. However, only 47% of clinicians reported having utilised the National Cancer Screening Register, and a third of clinicians did not believe that self-collection was a reasonable alternative to practitioner-collected screening for under-screened women. Increased demands for colposcopy were reported. All clinicians identified at least one area of educational need, including the management of women with a history of screen-detected abnormalities in the previous program (34.9%), post-colposcopy management for women with no abnormalities detected (25.5%), and screening in complex scenarios (eg immunocompromise) (26.5%). CONCLUSIONS Overall, Australian clinicians are comfortable with the main changes to the cervical screening program. Certain areas may require further policy review, such as screening in complex clinical scenarios, colposcopy availability, accessibility of the Register and self-collection. These issues could be meaningful for other countries switching to HPV-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena M Obermair
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsty F Bennett
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julia M L Brotherton
- VCS Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dodd RH, Cvejic E, Bell K, Black K, Bateson D, Smith MA, Mac OA, McCaffery KJ. Active surveillance as a management option for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2: An online experimental study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:179-187. [PMID: 33516531 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate framing of active surveillance as a management option for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 in women of childbearing age. METHODS We conducted a between-subjects factorial (2 × 2) randomised experiment. Women aged 25-40 living in Australia were presented with the same hypothetical pathway of testing human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive, high-grade cytology and a diagnosis of CIN2, through an online survey. They were randomised to one of four groups to evaluate the effects of (i) framing (method of explaining resolution of abnormal cells) and (ii) inclusion of an overtreatment statement (included versus not). Primary outcome was management choice following the scenario: active surveillance or surgery. RESULTS 1638 women were randomised. Overall, preference for active surveillance was high (78.9%; n = 1293/1638). There was no effect of framing or providing overtreatment information, or their interaction, on management choice. After adjusting for intervention received, age, education, and other model covariates, participants were more likely to choose active surveillance over surgery if they had not already had children, had plans for children in the future, had no family history of cancer, had no history of endometriosis, had adequate health literacy, and more trust in their GP. Participants were less likely to choose active surveillance over surgery if they were more predisposed to seek health care for minor problems. CONCLUSIONS Although we found no framing effect across the four conditions, we found a high level of preference for active surveillance with associations of increased preference that accord with the desire to minimise potential risks of CIN2 treatment on obstetric outcomes. These are valuable data for future clinical trials of active surveillance for management of CIN2 in younger women of childbearing age. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618002043213, 20/12/2018, prior to participant enrolment).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Katy Bell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten Black
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney 2050, Australia
| | - Deborah Bateson
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Family Planning New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2131, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney 2011, Australia
| | - Olivia A Mac
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dodd RH, Dadaczynski K, Okan O, McCaffery KJ, Pickles K. Psychological Wellbeing and Academic Experience of University Students in Australia during COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:866. [PMID: 33498376 PMCID: PMC7908219 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 has created significant challenges for higher education institutions and major disruptions in teaching and learning. To explore the psychological wellbeing of domestic and international university students during the COVID-19 pandemic, an online cross-sectional survey recruited 787 university students (18+ years) currently studying at an Australian university. In total, 86.8% reported that COVID-19 had significantly impacted their studies. Overall, 34.7% of students reported a sufficient level of wellbeing, while 33.8% showed low wellbeing and 31.5% very low wellbeing. Wellbeing was significantly higher in postgraduate students compared with undergraduate students. Future anxiety was significantly greater among undergraduate than postgraduate students. Multivariable regression models showed female gender, low subjective social status, negative overall learning experience or reporting COVID-19 having a huge impact on study, were associated with lower wellbeing in the first few months (May-July) of the pandemic. Supporting the health, wellbeing, and learning experiences of all students should be of high priority now and post-pandemic. Strategies specifically targeting female students, and those with low self-reported social status are urgently needed to avoid exacerbating existing disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H. Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; (K.J.M.); (K.P.)
| | - Kevin Dadaczynski
- Department of Nursing and Health Science, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, 36037 Fulda, Germany;
- Centre for Applied Health Science, Leuphana University Lueneburg, 21335 Lueneburg, Germany
| | - Orkan Okan
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Literacy Research, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany;
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; (K.J.M.); (K.P.)
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; (K.J.M.); (K.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pickles K, Cvejic E, Nickel B, Copp T, Bonner C, Leask J, Ayre J, Batcup C, Cornell S, Dakin T, Dodd RH, Isautier JMJ, McCaffery KJ. COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e23805. [PMID: 33302250 PMCID: PMC7800906 DOI: 10.2196/23805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Misinformation about COVID-19 is common and has been spreading rapidly across the globe through social media platforms and other information systems. Understanding what the public knows about COVID-19 and identifying beliefs based on misinformation can help shape effective public health communications to ensure efforts to reduce viral transmission are not undermined. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation in Australia and their changes over time. METHODS This prospective, longitudinal national survey was completed by adults (18 years and above) across April (n=4362), May (n=1882), and June (n=1369) 2020. RESULTS Stronger agreement with misinformation was associated with younger age, male gender, lower education level, and language other than English spoken at home (P<.01 for all). After controlling for these variables, misinformation beliefs were significantly associated (P<.001) with lower levels of digital health literacy, perceived threat of COVID-19, confidence in government, and trust in scientific institutions. Analyses of specific government-identified misinformation revealed 3 clusters: prevention (associated with male gender and younger age), causation (associated with lower education level and greater social disadvantage), and cure (associated with younger age). Lower institutional trust and greater rejection of official government accounts were associated with stronger agreement with COVID-19 misinformation. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study highlight important gaps in communication effectiveness, which must be addressed to ensure effective COVID-19 prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tessa Copp
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Julie Ayre
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bonner C, Cvejic E, Ayre J, Isautier J, Semsarian C, Nickel B, Batcup C, Pickles K, Dodd R, Cornell S, Copp T, McCaffery KJ. The Psychological Impact of Hypertension During COVID-19 Restrictions: Retrospective Case-Control Study. JMIRx Med 2021; 2:e25610. [PMID: 34076628 PMCID: PMC8078439 DOI: 10.2196/25610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear how people with hypertension are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic given their increased risk, and whether targeted public health strategies are needed. OBJECTIVE This retrospective case-control study compared people with hypertension to matched healthy controls during the COVID-19 lockdown to determine whether they have higher risk perceptions, anxiety, and vaccination intentions. METHODS Baseline data from a national survey were collected in April 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown in Australia. People who reported hypertension with no other chronic conditions were randomly matched to healthy controls of similar age, gender, education, and health literacy level. A subset including participants with hypertension was followed up at 2 months after restrictions were eased. Risk perceptions, anxiety, and vaccination intentions were measured in April and June. RESULTS Of the 4362 baseline participants, 466 (10.7%) reported hypertension with no other chronic conditions. A subset of 1369 people were followed up at 2 months, which included 147 (10.7%) participants with hypertension. At baseline, perceived seriousness was high for both hypertension and control groups. The hypertension group reported greater anxiety compared to the controls and were more willing to vaccinate against influenza, but COVID-19 vaccination intentions were similar. At follow-up, these differences were no longer present in the longitudinal subsample. Perceived seriousness and anxiety had decreased, but vaccination intentions for both influenza and COVID-19 remained high across groups (>80%). CONCLUSIONS Anxiety was above normal levels during the COVID-19 lockdown. It was higher in the hypertension group, which also had higher vaccination intentions. Groups that are more vulnerable to COVID-19 may require targeted mental health screening during periods of greater risk. Despite a decrease in perceived risk and anxiety after 2 months of lockdown restrictions, vaccination intentions remained high, which is encouraging for the future prevention of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology Centenary Institute The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
- Department of Cardiology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Rachael Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Samuel Cornell
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Copp T, Kvesic D, Lieberman D, Bateson D, McCaffery KJ. 'Your hopes can run away with your realistic expectations': a qualitative study of women and men's decision-making when undergoing multiple cycles of IVF. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa059. [PMID: 33392395 PMCID: PMC7757429 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the factors that contribute to the decision to continue or stop IVF treatment after multiple unsuccessful cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER Factors contributing to the decision included external factors, such as their doctor's guidance, success rates, the outcomes of previous cycles and anecdotal stories of success, as well as emotional and cognitive drivers, including perception of success, hope and fear of regret. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Infertility affects about one in six Australian couples of reproductive age. Regarding IVF, some couples with a good prognosis drop out of treatment prematurely, whilst others continue for multiple cycles, despite limited chances of success. Little is known about what factors contribute to the decision to continue IVF after multiple failed cycles. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION Semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with 22 participants. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Doctors and nurses at an Australian private fertility clinic recruited individuals and/or couples who had undergone three or more complete unsuccessful cycles of IVF. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The majority of participants had decided to or were leaning towards continuing treatment. Participants expressed a range of common factors important in their decision-making, which were evident both within and across couples. For most, their doctor's advice and hope were key factors influencing their decision. Most participants expressed they would continue as long as there was a chance of success and until their doctor advised otherwise. Other factors included participants' perception of their likelihood of success, hearing anecdotal stories of success after multiple cycles, positive outcomes of previous cycles and fear of regret. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The sample was highly educated and recruited from one private Australian fertility clinic only. Many participants were also couples, which may have resulted in more homogenous data as they shared the same diagnosis for infertility and outcomes of previous cycles. Factors influencing the decision to continue or stop may differ in different sociodemographic populations and in other healthcare systems. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Given the important role of the doctor's guidance and patients' own perceptions of their likelihood of success, which they tended to overestimate, it is vital that fertility specialists give accurate and transparent information regarding their likelihood of success and continue to regularly communicate this throughout the IVF journey. Anecdotal stories of success against the odds appeared to be influential in the decision to continue and underpinned unrealistic perceptions of possible success. More personalized, cumulative estimates of likelihood of success may help couples with their decision-making as well as with discussions about ending treatment or setting a limit before commencing IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grant (APP1113532). No further competing interests exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Copp
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Kvesic
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - D Bateson
- Family Planning NSW, Ashfield, NSW, Australia.,Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - K J McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dodd RH, Nickel B, Smith MA, Brotherton JML, McCaffery KJ. Getting the timing right: Women's views on the best time to announce changes to cancer screening policy recommendations. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20:101268. [PMID: 33318889 PMCID: PMC7724372 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Women suggest communicating changes to screening programs 6–12 months before implementation. Opportunities to be involved in consultation about changes are important. Preference for information using evidence, with an option of more information. Recognition that the mode of delivery should differ by age.
In December 2017, the Australian National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) changed from 2-yearly cervical cytology to 5-yearly primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, starting at age 25 and with an exit test when aged 70–74. Women showed limited awareness of these changes prior to their implementation. We explored women’s preferences for how similar cancer screening changes could be communicated to the public in the future, including when, how, and using what methods. Six focus groups including 49 women aged 18–74 were conducted in November 2017. Focus groups were guided by information available on the NCSP website and information developed by the researchers. Generally, women suggested that communication of changes to cancer screening programs would ideally occur between 6 and 12 months ahead of their implementation and that they would like the opportunity to be involved in consultation about the changes. The NCSP website was described as answering basic questions, but also raising further questions for which there were no answers provided. Most groups preferred information which included evidence behind the changes and wanted an option of more information. Similar suggestions were made across all focus groups about how communications could be delivered, with recognition that the mode of delivery should differ by age. Women were still seeking information about the test itself and a symptom list, in order to be aware of these over the five-year period. These findings make an important and timely contribution which could help inform other countries considering making changes to their cancer screening programs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julia M L Brotherton
- VCS Population Health, VCS Foundation, Level 6, 176 Wellington Parade, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dodd RH, Pickles K, Nickel B, Cvejic E, Ayre J, Batcup C, Bonner C, Copp T, Cornell S, Dakin T, Isautier J, McCaffery KJ. Concerns and motivations about COVID-19 vaccination. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 21:161-163. [PMID: 33338440 PMCID: PMC7832277 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30926-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Samuel Cornell
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Isautier JM, Copp T, Ayre J, Cvejic E, Meyerowitz-Katz G, Batcup C, Bonner C, Dodd R, Nickel B, Pickles K, Cornell S, Dakin T, McCaffery KJ. People's Experiences and Satisfaction With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e24531. [PMID: 33156806 PMCID: PMC7732356 DOI: 10.2196/24531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has rapidly been adopted to deliver health care services around the world. To date, studies have not compared people’s experiences with telehealth services during the pandemic in Australia to their experiences with traditional in-person visits. Objective This study aimed to compare participants’ perceptions of telehealth consults to their perceptions of traditional in-person visits and investigate whether people believe that telehealth services would be useful after the pandemic. Methods A national, cross-sectional, community survey was conducted between June 5 and June 12, 2020 in Australia. In total, 1369 participants who were aged ≥18 years and lived in Australia were recruited via targeted advertisements on social media (ie, Facebook and Instagram). Participants responded to survey questions about their telehealth experience, which included a free-text response option. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the adjusted relative risks of having a poorer telehealth experience than a traditional in-person visit experience. Content analysis was performed to determine the reasons why telehealth experiences were worse than traditional in-person visit experiences. Results Of the 596 telehealth users, the majority of respondents (n=369, 61.9%) stated that their telehealth experience was “just as good as” or “better than” their traditional in-person medical appointment experience. On average, respondents perceived that telehealth would be moderately useful to very useful for medical appointments after the COVID-19 pandemic ends (mean 3.67, SD 1.1). Being male (P=.007), having a history of both depression and anxiety (P=.016), and lower patient activation scores (ie, individuals’ willingness to take on the role of managing their health/health care) (P=.036) were significantly associated with a poor telehealth experience. In total, 6 overarching themes were identified from free-text responses for why participants’ telehealth experiences were poorer than their traditional in-person medical appointment experiences, as follows: communication is not as effective, limitations with technology, issues with obtaining prescriptions and pathology results, reduced confidence in their doctor, additional burden for complex care, and inability to be physically examined. Conclusions Based on our sample’s responses, telehealth appointment experiences were comparable to traditional in-person medical appointment experiences. Telehealth may be worthwhile as a mode of health care delivery while the pandemic continues, and it may continue to be worthwhile after the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Mj Isautier
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz
- Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Western Sydney Diabetes, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachael Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Samuel Cornell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
McCaffery KJ, Dodd RH, Cvejic E, Ayrek J, Batcup C, Isautier JM, Copp T, Bonner C, Pickles K, Nickel B, Dakin T, Cornell S, Wolf MS. Health literacy and disparities in COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours in Australia. Public Health Res Pract 2020; 30:30342012. [PMID: 33294907 DOI: 10.17061/phrp30342012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the variation in understanding of, attitudes towards, and uptake of, health advice on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the 2020 pandemic stage 3 restrictions ('lockdown') by health literacy in the Australian population. STUDY DESIGN National cross-sectional community survey. SETTING Australian general public. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged over 18 years (N = 4362). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to COVID-19; health literacy and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS People with inadequate health literacy had poorer understanding of COVID-19 symptoms (49% vs 68%; p < 0.001), were less able to identify behaviours to prevent infection (59%% vs 72% p < 0.001), and experienced more difficulty finding information and understanding government messaging about COVID-19 than people with adequate health literacy. People with inadequate health literacy were less likely to rate social distancing as important (6.1 vs 6.5; p < 0.001) and reported more difficulty with remembering and accessing medicines since lockdown (3.6 vs 2.7; p < 0.001). People with lower health literacy were also more likely to endorse misinformed beliefs about COVID-19 and vaccinations (in general) than those with adequate health literacy. The same pattern of results was observed among people who primarily speak a language other than English at home. CONCLUSION Our findings show that there are important disparities in COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviours according to people's health literacy and language. These have the potential to undermine efforts to reduce viral transmission and may lead to social inequalities in health outcomes in Australia. People with the greatest burden of chronic disease are most disadvantaged, and are also most likely to experience severe disease and die from COVID-19. Addressing the health literacy, language and cultural needs of the community in public health messaging about COVID-19 must now be a priority in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia;
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ayrek
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carys Batcup
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer Mj Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Samuel Cornell
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael S Wolf
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, US
| |
Collapse
|