1
|
Derendorf L, Stock S, Simic D, Shukri A, Zelenak C, Nagel J, Friede T, Herbeck Belnap B, Herrmann-Lingen C, Pedersen SS, Sørensen J, Müller And On Behalf Of The Escape Consortium D. Health economic evaluation of blended collaborative care for older multimorbid heart failure patients: study protocol. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2024; 22:29. [PMID: 38615050 PMCID: PMC11015692 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00535-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated care, in particular the 'Blended Collaborative Care (BCC)' strategy, may have the potential to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in multimorbid patients with heart failure (HF) and psychosocial burden at no or low additional cost. The ESCAPE trial is a randomised controlled trial for the evaluation of a BCC approach in five European countries. For the economic evaluation of alongside this trial, the four main objectives were: (i) to document the costs of delivering the intervention, (ii) to assess the running costs across study sites, (iii) to evaluate short-term cost-effectiveness and cost-utility compared to providers' usual care, and (iv) to examine the budgetary implications. METHODS The trial-based economic analyses will include cross-country cost-effectiveness and cost-utility assessments from a payer perspective. The cost-utility analysis will calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ-5D-5L and national value sets. Cost-effectiveness will include the cost per hospital admission avoided and the cost per depression-free days (DFD). Resource use will be measured from different sources, including electronic medical health records, standardised questionnaires, patient receipts and a care manager survey. Uncertainty will be addressed using bootstrapping. DISCUSSION The various methods and approaches used for data acquisition should provide insights into the potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of a BCC intervention. Providing the economic evaluation of ESCAPE will contribute to a country-based structural and organisational planning of BCC (e.g., the number of patients that may benefit, how many care managers are needed). Improved care is expected to enhance health-related quality of life at little or no extra cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study follows CHEERS2022 and is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00025120).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Derendorf
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dusan Simic
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arim Shukri
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Zelenak
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jonas Nagel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tim Friede
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Birgit Herbeck Belnap
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany
- Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Susanne S Pedersen
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Sørensen
- Healthcare Outcomes Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Derendorf L, Kusch M, Stock S, Lemmen C. Assessing the implementation of a comprehensive quality management system for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany. J Healthc Qual Res 2024; 39:32-40. [PMID: 37981471 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quality management in healthcare is essential for safe, effective, and patient-centered services. Quality management systems (QMS) monitor and improve healthcare quality. Integrating QMS is crucial for optimal quality of care, but previous studies show gaps in integration. This study aims to assess program adherence to a QMS in cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care and to develop strategies for better integration, ultimately improving healthcare quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study used a utility analysis to assess the program adherence of a cross-sectoral psycho-oncology care program using a 5-point scale. The evaluation process involved breaking down the program into distinct areas, and used key figures and developed indicators to assess adherence. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS The study conducted a comprehensive assessment of program adherence in a complex care program, analysing 4460 evaluation cases based on 128 quality indicators. The results showed a score of 4.2 out of 5 points (84%), indicating a highly effective implementation of the QMS. Notably, the study observed successful implementation of top-down elements, while encountering more challenges in integrating bottom-up aspects. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates effective implementation of a comprehensive QMS. Successful integration was observed in areas such as care concept, care management, quality assurance, and IT-based documentation, while challenges remain in quality development and indicators. Active leadership involvement, staff training, data collection, and a learning culture are essential for successful implementation. Future research should assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of QMSs and develop tailored approaches to sustain healthcare professionals' motivation in quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Derendorf
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - M Kusch
- Center of Integrated Oncology ABCD, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Lemmen
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Derendorf L, Stock S, Simic D, Lemmen C. Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:599. [PMID: 37291536 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, the need for appropriately structured, high-quality care in psycho-oncology is more and more recognized and quality-oriented care is to be established. Quality indicators are becoming increasingly important for a systematic development and improvement of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators for a new form of care, a cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program in the German health care system. METHODS The widely established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was combined with a modified Delphi technique. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify existing indicators. All identified indicators were evaluated and rated in a two-round Delphi process. Expert panels embedded in the Delphi process assessed the indicators in terms of relevance, data availability and feasibility. An indicator was accepted by consensus if at least 75% of the ratings corresponded to category 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS Of the 88 potential indicators derived from a systematic literature review and other sources, 29 were deemed relevant in the first Delphi round. After the first expert panel, 28 of the dissented indicators were re-rated and added. Of these 57 indicators, 45 were found to be feasible in terms of data availability by the second round of expert panel. In total, 22 indicators were transferred into a quality report, implemented and tested within the care networks for participatory quality improvement. In the second Delphi round, the embedded indicators were tested for their practicability. The final set includes 16 indicators that were operationalized in care practice and rated by the expert panel as relevant, comprehensible, and suitable for care practice. CONCLUSION The developed set of quality indicators has proven in practical testing to be a valid quality assurance tool for internal and external quality management. The study findings could contribute to traceable high quality in cross-sectoral psycho-oncology by providing a valid and comprehensive set of quality indicators. TRIAL REGISTRATION "Entwicklung eines Qualitätsmanagementsystems in der integrierten, sektorenübergreifenden Psychoonkologie-AP "Qualitätsmanagement und Versorgungsmanagement" zur Studie "integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psychoonkologie (isPO)" a sub-project of the "integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psychoonkologie (isPO)", was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) (DRKS-ID: DRKS00021515) on 3rd September 2020. The main project was registered on 30th October 2018 (DRKS-ID: DRKS00015326).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Derendorf
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dusan Simic
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zelenak C, Nagel J, Bersch K, Derendorf L, Doyle F, Friede T, Herbeck Belnap B, Kohlmann S, Skou ST, Velasco CA, Albus C, Asendorf T, Bang CA, Beresnevaite M, Bruun NE, Burg MM, Buhl SF, Gæde PH, Lühmann D, Markser A, Nagy KV, Rafanelli C, Rasmussen S, Søndergaard J, Sørensen J, Stauder A, Stock S, Urbinati S, Riva DD, Wachter R, Walker F, Pedersen SS, Herrmann‐Lingen C. Integrated care for older multimorbid heart failure patients: protocol for the ESCAPE randomized trial and cohort study. ESC Heart Fail 2023; 10:2051-2065. [PMID: 36907651 PMCID: PMC10192276 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
ESCAPE Evaluation of a patient-centred biopsychosocial blended collaborative care pathway for the treatment of multimorbid elderly patients. THERAPEUTIC AREA Healthcare interventions for the management of older patients with multiple morbidities. AIMS Multi-morbidity treatment is an increasing challenge for healthcare systems in ageing societies. This comprehensive cohort study with embedded randomized controlled trial tests an integrated biopsychosocial care model for multimorbid elderly patients. HYPOTHESIS A holistic, patient-centred pro-active 9-month intervention based on the blended collaborative care (BCC) approach and enhanced by information and communication technologies can improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease outcomes as compared with usual care at 9 months. METHODS Across six European countries, ESCAPE is recruiting patients with heart failure, mental distress/disorder plus ≥2 medical co-morbidities into an observational cohort study. Within the cohort study, 300 patients will be included in a randomized controlled assessor-blinded two-arm parallel group interventional clinical trial (RCT). In the intervention, trained care managers (CMs) regularly support patients and informal carers in managing their multiple health problems. Supervised by a clinical specialist team, CMs remotely support patients in implementing the treatment plan-customized to the patients' individual needs and preferences-into their daily lives and liaise with patients' healthcare providers. An eHealth platform with an integrated patient registry guides the intervention and helps to empower patients and informal carers. HRQoL measured with the EQ-5D-5L as primary endpoint, and secondary outcomes, that is, medical and patient-reported outcomes, healthcare costs, cost-effectiveness, and informal carer burden, will be assessed at 9 and ≥18 months. CONCLUSIONS If proven effective, the ESCAPE BCC intervention can be implemented in routine care for older patients with multiple morbidities across the participating countries and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Zelenak
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity of Göttingen Medical CentreGöttingenGermany
| | - Jonas Nagel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity of Göttingen Medical CentreGöttingenGermany
| | - Kristina Bersch
- Clinical Trial Unit of the University Medical Center GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Lisa Derendorf
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical EpidemiologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Frank Doyle
- Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Tim Friede
- Department of Medical StatisticsUniversity of Göttingen Medical CentreGöttingenGermany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Birgit Herbeck Belnap
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity of Göttingen Medical CentreGöttingenGermany
- Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Sebastian Kohlmann
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity Hospital Hamburg EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Søren T. Skou
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational TherapyNæstved‐Slagelse‐Ringsted Hospitals, Region ZealandSlagelseDenmark
- Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Carlos A. Velasco
- Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FITSchloss BirlinghovenSankt AugustinGermany
| | - Christian Albus
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of Psychosomatics and PsychotherapyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Thomas Asendorf
- Clinical Trial Unit of the University Medical Center GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | | | - Margarita Beresnevaite
- Laboratory of Clinical Cardiology, Institute of CardiologyLithuanian University of Health SciencesKaunasLithuania
| | - Niels Eske Bruun
- Department of CardiologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
- Clinical InstitutesCopenhagen and Aalborg UniversitiesCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Sussi Friis Buhl
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Peter H. Gæde
- Department of Cardiology and EndocrinologySlagelse HospitalSlagelseDenmark
- Institute of Regional HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | | | - Anna Markser
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of Psychosomatics and PsychotherapyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | | | | | - Sanne Rasmussen
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Jens Søndergaard
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Jan Sørensen
- Healthcare Outcomes Research CentreDublinIreland
| | - Adrienne Stauder
- Institute of Behavioural SciencesSemmelweis UniversityBudapestHungary
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical EpidemiologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | | | | | | | - Florian Walker
- Clinical Trial Unit of the University Medical Center GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Susanne S. Pedersen
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
- Department of CardiologyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
| | - Christoph Herrmann‐Lingen
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity of Göttingen Medical CentreGöttingenGermany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kusch M, Labouvie H, Schiewer V, Talalaev N, Cwik JC, Bussmann S, Vaganian L, Gerlach AL, Dresen A, Cecon N, Salm S, Krieger T, Pfaff H, Lemmen C, Derendorf L, Stock S, Samel C, Hagemeier A, Hellmich M, Leicher B, Hültenschmidt G, Swoboda J, Haas P, Arning A, Göttel A, Schwickerath K, Graeven U, Houwaart S, Kerek-Bodden H, Krebs S, Muth C, Hecker C, Reiser M, Mauch C, Benner J, Schmidt G, Karlowsky C, Vimalanandan G, Matyschik L, Galonska L, Francke A, Osborne K, Nestle U, Bäumer M, Schmitz K, Wolf J, Hallek M. Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:543. [PMID: 35459202 PMCID: PMC9034572 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07782-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The annual incidence of new cancer cases has been increasing worldwide for many years, and is likely to continue to rise. In Germany, the number of new cancer cases is expected to increase by 20% until 2030. Half of all cancer patients experience significant emotional and psychosocial distress along the continuum of their disease, treatment, and aftercare, and also as long-term survivors. Consequently, in many countries, psycho-oncological programs have been developed to address this added burden at both the individual and population level. These programs promote the active engagement of patients in their cancer therapy, aftercare and survivorship planning and aim to improve the patients' quality of life. In Germany, the “new form of care isPO” (“nFC-isPO”; integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology/integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psycho-Onkologie) is currently being developed, implemented and evaluated. This approach strives to accomplish the goals devised in the National Cancer Plan by providing psycho-oncological care to all cancer patients according to their individual healthcare needs. The term “new form of care" is defined by the Innovation Fund (IF) of Germany's Federal Joint Committee as “a structured and legally binding cooperation between different professional groups and/or institutions in medical and non-medical care”. The nFC-isPO is part of the isPO project funded by the IF. It is implemented in four local cancer centres and is currently undergoing a continuous quality improvement process. As part of the isPO project the nFC-isPO is being evaluated by an independent institution: the Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Germany. The four-year isPO project was selected by the IF to be eligible for funding because it meets the requirements of the federal government's National Cancer Plan (NCP), in particular, the “further development of the oncological care structures and quality assurance" in the psycho-oncological domain. An independent evaluation is required by the IF to verify if the new form of care leads to an improvement in cross-sectoral care and to explore its potential for permanent integration into the German health care system. Methods The nFC-isPO consists of six components: a concept of care (C1), care pathways (C2), a psycho-oncological care network (C3), a care process organization plan (C4), an IT-supported documentation and assistance system (C5) and a quality management system (C6). The two components concept of care (C1) and care pathways (C2) represent the isPO clinical care program, according to which the individual cancer patients are offered psycho-oncological services within a period of 12 months after program enrolment following the diagnosis of cancer. The remaining components (C3-C6) represent the formal-administrative aspects of the nFC-isPO that are intended to meet the legally binding requirements of patient care in the German health care system. With the aim of systematic development of the nFC-isPO while at the same time enabling the external evaluators to examine its quality, effectiveness and efficiency under conditions of routine care, the project partners took into consideration approaches from translational psycho-oncology, practice-based health care research and program theory. In order to develop a structured, population-based isPO care program, reference was made to a specific program theory, to the stepped-care approach, and also to evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The basic version, nFC-isPO, was created over the first year after the start of the isPO project in October 2017, and has since been subject to a continuous quality improvement process. In 2019, the nFC-isPO was implemented at four local psycho-oncological care networks in the federal state North Rhine-Westphalia, in Germany. The legal basis of the implementation is a contract for "special care" with the German statutory health insurance funds according to state law (§ 140a SCB V; Social Code Book V for the statutory health insurance funds). Besides the accompanying external evaluation by the IMVR, the nFC-isPO is subjected to quarterly internal and cross-network quality assurance and improvement measures (internal evaluation) in order to ensure continuous quality improvement process. These quality management measures are developed and tested in the isPO project and are to be retained in order to ensure the sustainability of the quality of nFC-isPO for later dissemination into the German health care system. Discussion Demands on quality, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of in the German health care system are increasing, whereas financial resources are declining, especially for psychosocial services. At the same time, knowledge about evidence-based screening, assessment and intervention in cancer patients and about the provision of psychosocial oncological services is growing continuously. Due to the legal framework of the statutory health insurance in Germany, it has taken years to put sound psycho-oncological findings from research into practice. Ensuring the adequate and sustainable financing of a needs-oriented, psycho-oncological care approach for all newly diagnosed cancer patients, as required by the NCP, may still require many additional years. The aim of the isPO project is to develop a new form of psycho-oncological care for the individual and the population suffering from cancer, and to provide those responsible for German health policy with a sound basis for decision-making on the timely dissemination of psycho-oncological services in the German health care system. Trial registration The study was pre-registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de/DRKS00015326) under the following trial registration number: DRKS00015326; Date of registration: October 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kusch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Hildegard Labouvie
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vera Schiewer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalie Talalaev
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan C Cwik
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sonja Bussmann
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lusine Vaganian
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander L Gerlach
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antje Dresen
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Natalia Cecon
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sandra Salm
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Theresia Krieger
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Pfaff
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lisa Derendorf
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christina Samel
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Hagemeier
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Leicher
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Gregor Hültenschmidt
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jessica Swoboda
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Peter Haas
- Department of Computer Science (Medical Informatics), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Anna Arning
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Göttel
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Ullrich Graeven
- Krebsgesellschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen E.V, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Houwaart
- House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hedy Kerek-Bodden
- House of the Cancer Patient Support Associations of Germany, Bonn, Germany
| | - Steffen Krebs
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiana Muth
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Marcel Reiser
- PIOH Köln - Praxis Internistischer Onkologie Und Hämatologie, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jürgen Wolf
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Hallek
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|