The circadian system: plasticity at many levels

Over the years it has become crystal clear that a variety of processes encode time-of-day information, ranging from gene expression, protein stability, or subcellular localization of key proteins, to the fine tuning of network properties and modulation of input signals, ultimately ensuring that physiology and behavior are properly synchronized to a changing environment. The purpose of this review is to put forward examples (as opposed to generate a comprehensive revision of all the available literature) in which the circadian system displays a remarkable degree of plasticity, from cell autonomous to circuit-based levels. In the literature, the term circadian plasticity has been used to refer to different concepts. The obvious one, more literally, refers to any change that follows a circadian (circa=around, diem=day) pattern, i.e. a daily change of a given parameter. The discovery of daily remodeling of neuronal structures will be referred herein as structural circadian plasticity, and represents an additional and novel phenomenon modified daily. Finally, any plasticity that has to do with a circadian parameter would represent a type of circadian plasticity; as an example, adjustments that allow organisms to adapt their daily behavior to the annual changes in photoperiod is a form of circadian plasticity at a higher organizational level, which is an emergent property of the whole circadian system. Throughout this work we will revisit these types of changes by reviewing recent literature delving around circadian control of clock outputs, from the most immediate ones within pacemaker neurons to the circadian modulation of rest-activity cycles.

Light-dependent sequestration of TIMELESS by CRYPTOCHROME

Most organisms have circadian clocks consisting of negative feedback loops of gene regulation that facilitate adaptation to cycles of light and darkness. In this study, CRYPTOCHROME (CRY), a protein involved in circadian photoperception in Drosophila, is shown to block the function of PERIOD/TIMELESS (PER/TIM) heterodimeric complexes in a light-dependent fashion. TIM degradation does not occur under these conditions; thus, TIM degradation is uncoupled from abrogation of its function by light. CRY and TIM are part of the same complex and directly interact in yeast in a light-dependent fashion. PER/TIM and CRY influence the subcellular distribution of these protein complexes, which reside primarily in the nucleus after the perception of a light signal. Thus, CRY acts as a circadian photoreceptor by directly interacting with core components of the circadian clock.

Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim

The circadian oscillator generates a rhythmic output with a period of about 24 hours. Despite extensive studies in several model systems, the biochemical mode of action has not yet been demonstrated for any of its components. Here, the Drosophila CLOCK protein was shown to induce transcription of the circadian rhythm genes period and timeless. dCLOCK functioned as a heterodimer with a Drosophila homolog of BMAL1. These proteins acted through an E-box sequence in the period promoter. The timeless promoter contains an 18-base pair element encompassing an E-box, which was sufficient to confer dCLOCK responsiveness to a reporter gene. PERIOD and TIMELESS proteins blocked dCLOCK's ability to transactivate their promoters via the E-box. Thus, dCLOCK drives expression of period and timeless, which in turn inhibit dCLOCK's activity and close the circadian loop.

Simultaneous accumulation of multiple viral coat proteins from a TEV-NIa based expression vector

We previously described an expression cassette that relies on the tobacco etch virus (TEV) nuclear inclusion a (NIa) protease and leads to the coordinated accumulation of multiple proteins through self processing of a polyprotein [21]. However, low levels of proteins accumulated when the full-length protease was encoded within the polyprotein [22]. Studies were conducted to evaluate whether the disruption of NIa nuclear localization would affect the levels of proteins produced via the cassette. Modifications comprised either removal of its nuclear localization signals (NLSs), removal of the VPg domain (which includes the NLSs), and fusion to the 6 kDa protein, previously demonstrated to be a viral cytoplasmic anchor [28]. In in vitro translation reactions and in vivo protoplast experiments the modified NIa retained sequence-specific proteolysis. Moreover, the removal of the NLSs correlated with an increase in GUS reporter accumulation. The modified cassette, pPRO10, led to the synthesis of up to three viral coat protein (CPs) in addition to NIa. However, the accumulation of proteins in protoplasts depended upon the position of the CP coding sequence within the cassette as well as on the stability of the protein.

Development and application of a nonradioactive nucleic acid hybridization system for simultaneous detection of four potato pathogens

cDNA clones of potato virus X (PVXcp strain), potato virus Y (PVYo strain), potato leaf roll virus (PLRV) and potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTV) were used separately or combined for the detection of the corresponding RNAs in extracts of infected plants. A general method for the rapid preparation of RNA extracts without use of organic solvents (i.e. phenol) was developed for this purpose. Plant extracts from a range of field, artificially inoculated germplasm genotypes, micro-propagated and protoplast samples, as well as vector insect extracts, were dot-blotted onto nylon or nitrocellulose membranes, subjected to sandwich nucleic acid hybridization with non-labelled specific single-stranded DNA probes followed by a biotin-labelled second step hybridization probe. Each probe was virus-specific but not strain-specific. Healthy or non-related plant extracts developed very faint or no signals. Sensitivity was tested by slot-blot hybridization. Detection levels were between 1.5 to 6 pg of viral nucleic acids and between 20 to 50 times more sensitive than standard double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). The assay developed was tested with material that was prepared for processing in the field (combination of fresh sap with extraction solution) and tested under simple laboratory conditions for detection. It was also successfully employed for screening of germplasm for virus resistance, detection of pathogens in vector insects, plantlets grown in vitro and in more sophisticated quantitative determinations of viral replication in artificially inoculated plants and protoplasts.