Efficacy and safety of intranasally applied dimetindene maleate solution. Multicenter study in children under 14 years suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasally applied dimetindene (CAS 3614-69-5) 0.1% spray in children suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 100 children under 14 years with acute seasonal allergic rhinitis participated in this randomised, single-blind, reference-controlled, multi-center, parallel group study with two treatment groups. The study took place between 2nd April and 16th September 1996 during the pollen season. Patients were examined at enrollment (day 1), day 8 and day 15. Patients kept diary throughout the 2-week treatment phase. Patients were randomised to receive either dimetindene 0.1% (Fenistil Nasal Spray) or a levocabastine (CAS 79516-68-0) 0.05% solution as reference medication. Both medications were supplied in similar outer packages. A single-blind approach was chosen, because the reference medication levocabastine requires two spray puffs per nostril as a single dose, whereas for dimetindene maleate solution a single spray puff per nostril is sufficient. Dimetindene 0.1% was applied with 1 spray puff (= 0.14 mg dimetindene) in each nostril and levocabastine with 2 spray puff (= 0.10 mg levocabastine) in each nostril every day in the morning before leaving the house and in the evening before going to bed. Additional administration of the spray was allowed up to 4 times a day if needed. Efficacy was assessed as change in severity of characteristic symptoms associated with pollen rhinitis: nasal rhinorrhea, nasal itching, nasal sneezing and nasal congestion. In addition, changes in ocular symptoms, lacrimation, ocular itching and red eyes, global physician's assessment of efficacy at the end of treatment were assessed. The primary criterion change of total nasal symptom severity score between day 1 and day 3 resulted in a statistically equivalent and therapeutically relevant symptom reduction for the two treatments. All secondary criteria showed a similar reduction in symptoms, thus underlining the consistency of the findings. Both nasal sprays were well tolerated. It is concluded from these results that dimetindene 0.1% nasal spray solution is a safe and efficient treatment option for children under 14 years suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Efficacy and tolerability of intranasally applied dimetindene maleate solution versus placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a 0.1% dimetindene maleate spray (Fenistil Nasal Dosierspray) compared to placebo when applied intranasally. Dimetindene (dimetindene maleate, CAS 3614-69-5, DMM) is a very potent and well established H1-receptor antagonist. A total of 36 asymptomatic patients (17 female, 19 male), suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis from grass pollen, were randomly assigned to treatment with matching topicalnasal sprays with either dimetindene maleate 0.1% or placebo as control in a double-blind, randomised, cross-over-design, with 2 weeks wash-out periods between. The trial period was chosen in a pollen-free time from 20th October to 5th November 1998 to guarantee asymptomatic patients. The patients being allergic to grass pollen, verified by positive case history, positive skin prick test and positive nasal provocation test, were challenged under controlled conditions with purified airborne grass pollen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber. The nasal spray were applied as single doses (1 puff = 0.14 ml of the respective solution with or without 0.14 mg dimetindene maleate) in the evening before at 7.30 p.m. and in the morning at 7.30 a.m. to each nostril exactly 15 min before the onset of allergen provocation. The dosage scheme relates to a daily dose of 0.56 mg DMM in the active treatment group. Subjective nasal and ocular symptoms were measured on-line in time intervals of 30 min during the 4 h allergen provocation. The statistical analysis was a priori sequentially ordered to account for multiple testing and keep the 5% level of significance. All measured primary criteria, Total Nasal Symptom Score (p < 0.0001) calculated from the three single symptoms running of the nose (p = 0.0032) sneezing stimulus (p < 0.0001) and nasal itching (p < 0.0001), as well nasal secretion (p = 0.0031), resulted consistently in a statistically significant and clinically relevant superiority of 0.1% DMM compared to placebo. The same superior treatment effect was observed for all the other criteria, despite the nasal flow, but including the ocular variables. This can be interpreted as a positive efficacy also in secondary allergic conjunctivitis. No systemic or topical adverse events were reported. The results of the study demonstrate that 0.1% DMM as nasal spray is an efficient and safe application form for patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Efficacy of Artichoke dry extract in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia

Efficacy and tolerability of artichoke dry extract (drug/extract ratio 25-35:1, aquous extract, CY450) as coated tablets containing 450 mg extract (tradename: Valverde Artischocke bei Verdauungsbeschwerden) was investigated in the treatment of hyperlipoproteinemia and compared with placebo. 143 adult patients with initial total cholesterol of > 7.3 mmol/l (> 280 mg/dl) were included in a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multi-center clinical trial. Patients received 1,800 mg artichoke dry extract per day or placebo over 6 weeks. Changes of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol from baseline to the end of treatment showed a statistically significant superiority (p = 0.0001) of artichoke dry extract over placebo. The decrease of total cholesterol in the CY450 group was 18.5% compared to 8.6% in the placebo group. LDL-cholesterol decrease in the CY450 group was 22.9% and 6.3% for placebo. LDL/HDL ratio showed a decrease of 20.2% in the CY450 group and 7.2% in the placebo group. There were no drug related adverse events during this study indicating an excellent tolerability of artichoke dry extract. This prospective study could contribute clear evidence to recommend artichoke dry extract CY450 for treating hyperlipoproteinemia and, thus, prevention of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease.

Dimethindene maleate in the treatment of sunburn. A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

The efficacy of topical dimethindene maleate (DMM, CAS 31614-69-5, Fenistil Gel) in the treatment of sunburn was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, 1-period crossover trial in 24 healthy volunteers. An UV-erythema (sunburn) of a well-defined intensity and extent was experimentally induced on three different skin test-areas by means of UV-A/B irradiation with three times the minimal erythema dose (MED). About 24 h after irradiation, one skin test-area was subjected to a 1-h occlusive treatment with DMM gel, the second test area was subjected to treatment with a placebo gel and the third one remained untreated. As objective-quantitative indicators of tenderness, a key symptom of sunburn, sensory and pain thresholds to CO2-Laser stimulation and laser somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in Vertex-EEG were assessed about 1.5 h postdose. The reaction times (RTs) to painless and painful CO2-laser stimulation (sensory and pain threshold level, respectively) on the DMM-treated area were significantly longer than RTs to stimulation on the placebo-treated area. Thresholds in terms of laser energy showed no differences between the treatments. The SEP N1-amplitude on the DMM-area was markedly decreased in comparison to placebo. With regard to subjective sensations of pain, itching and tenderness assessed by means of visual analogue scales (VAS), no clinically relevant differences between treatments were observed after sole UV-irradiation. After additional laser stimulation tenderness was--objectively but not subjectively--decreased on the DMM-area versus placebo. Both gel preparations were well tolerated.

Comparative clinical efficacy and tolerability of oxerutins and horse chestnut extract in patients with chronic venous insufficiency

Oxerutins (O-(beta-hydroxyethyl)rutosides, HR, Venoruton) and horse chestnut extract (HCE) are active principles of first priority for the pharmacological treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). The efficacies of both compounds were shown in numerous, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trials. Besides the direct comparison of the two compounds the aim of the study was to investigate the initial dose/maintenance dose concept for HR. 137 female, postmenopausal patients with CVI II finished the study according to protocol. Following one week placebo run-in the patients were treated either with 1000 mg/d HR, 600 mg/d HCE or 1000 mg/d for 4 weeks and than with 500 mg/d HR within the initial dose/maintainance dose concept for 12 weeks and observed for further 6 weeks. A main confirmative criterion was the volume reduction of the leg. Subjective criteria were descriptively evaluated. HR (1000 mg/d) was proven to be equivalent or better, reducing the leg volume (AUB0-18) by -5273 +/- 11418 ml.d compared to -3187 +/- 10842 ml.d under HR (1000 mg/d and 500 mg/d), and -3004 +/- 7429 ml.d under HCE-treatment. Both compounds exhibit a substantial carry-over effect. The maintenance posology of HR is able to stabilize the therapeutic obtained under initial dose conditions.

Investigation of the efficacy of oxerutins compared to placebo in patients with chronic venous insufficiency treated with compression stockings

The aim of this study was to investigate, if the the combined treatment of compression stockings and drug treatment with oxerutins (O-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides, Venoruton) provides additional benefit for patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) compared to compression treatment alone. Oxerutins belong to the group of oedema protective agents and possess anti-exudative and membrane protective activity. A total of 133 female patients with CVI grade II participated in this double-blind, randomised, multi-centre, parallel-group study with two treatment groups. The whole study lasted for 19 weeks, and consisted of a one week placebo run-in phase, 12 weeks treatment phase, followed by a 6 weeks treatment-free follow-up period. All patients received a basis compression therapy that consisted of standard compression stockings. In order to standardise initial fitting of stockings in this multi-centre setting, stockings were fitted after one week of standard diuretics starting at baseline and then stockings were worn for the following 11 weeks. Patients were randomised to receive oxerutins (2 x 500 mg daily) or matching placebo. Leg volumes (water displacement) and associated subjective symptoms (visula analogue scale) were measured during a placebo run-in period at enrolment (week - 1) and half a week later (week - 1/2), at baseline week 0), at 4, 8, 12 weeks on treatment, and again after a 3- and 6-weeks treatment-free follow-up. The primary efficacy criterion, the area under the baseline from week 0 to week 18 (AUB0-18) of leg volume changes, as measurement of the global change of leg oedema during the study, resulted in a superior reduction of -5589 ml.d for the combined treatment with oxerutins compared to -2101 ml.d for placebo (p = 0.012). The mean change of leg volume compared to baseline after 12 weeks of treatment was -63.9 ml for stockings and oxerutins, and -32.9 ml for the patients who received stockings and placebo (p < 0.05). Oxerutins showed a prolonged effect in the follow-up phase compared to placebo, with mean AUB values for week 12 to week 18 of -1769 ml.d versus -133 ml.d (p < 0.01). The study demonstrated that the combined therapy of compression stockings and drug treatment with oxerutins is significantly superior in reducing leg oedema resulting from chronic venous insufficiency compared to compression treatment alone.