1
|
Emmerich F, Junghans J, Zenger M, Brähler E, Stöbel-Richter Y, Irmscher L, Richter EP, Berth H. Impact of Home-Based Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental and Physical Health in a German Population-Based Sample. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:789. [PMID: 38610211 PMCID: PMC11011634 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12070789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 outbreak necessitated physical distancing, as part of secondary prevention, at a personal and professional level. Working from home (WFH) became increasingly important. In this study, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on physical and mental health is investigated, compared with pre-pandemic data, and with employees who WFH and are on-site. Methods: Data from the German Saxon longitudinal study population were used. Attitudes towards WFH as well as mental and physical health assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic were examined. Comparisons were made with corresponding pre-pandemic scores and between employees WFH and on-site in 2022. Results: In total, 319 participants with equal gender distribution were included. Of those, 86 worked from home stating better organizability of their work, more time for partnership, less stress, and greater work satisfaction. Compared to pre-pandemic data, the D-score, PHQ-4, G-Score, and PHQ-SSS-8 showed a significant increase. No difference in physical or mental health between employees WFH and on-site was observed. Conclusion: In general, COVID-19 restrictions had a negative impact on mental and physical health. Although WFH is well accepted, it did not show significant health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Emmerich
- Division of Psychosocial Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Junghans
- Division of Psychosocial Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Differential and Personality Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, 39114 Stendal, Germany
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy/Behavioral Medicine, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Faculty of Managerial and Cultural Studies, The University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, 02763 Zittau, Germany
| | - Lisa Irmscher
- Division of Psychosocial Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Ernst Peter Richter
- Division of Psychosocial Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Division of Psychosocial Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berth H, Brähler E, Braunheim L, Zenger M, Stöbel-Richter Y, Emmerich F, Richter EP, Irmscher L. [Anxiety, Depression, Psychological Strain and Physical Complaints before and after the Covid-19 Pandemic in a German Longitudinal Study with Adults from Saxony]. Psychiatr Prax 2024; 51:163-166. [PMID: 37944944 DOI: 10.1055/a-2191-0234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to investigate whether psychological distress increased in a German community sample from Saxony during the course of the Corona pandemic. METHODS In 2017/2018 and 2022, N=289 participants (54.7% female) of the Saxon Longitudinal Study were interviewed about their psychological well-being using questionnaires (PHQ-4, SSS-8). RESULTS There is a significant increase in complaints (anxiety, depression, psychological distress, physical complaints) compared to 2017/2018 to 2022 with effect sizes in the small and medium range (Cohens d=0.26-0.62). CONCLUSION Data collection was not due to the pandemic but was routine as part of an ongoing long-term study. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in psychological distress and physical complaints in a Saxonian, age-homogeneous population sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Berth
- Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
- Abteilung Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Lisa Braunheim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal
- Verhaltensmedizin, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum AdipositasErkrankungen, Leipzig
| | | | - Franziska Emmerich
- Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Ernst Peter Richter
- Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Technische Universität Dresden
| | - Lisa Irmscher
- Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Technische Universität Dresden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bantel D, Chmielewski WX, Brähler E, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Berth H. Variables associated with oral health-related self-efficacy - results of a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:939. [PMID: 38017511 PMCID: PMC10683143 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03656-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral health-related self-efficacy (OH-SE) is pivotal for oral health and is associated with other oral-health related variables, such as dental fear and anxiety (DF/A) and dental hygiene behaviors (DHB). This study attempts to analyze associations between OH-SE and oral healthrelated variables in a German population to extend previous research by analyzing whether OH-SE can be predicted by these variables, as this might contribute to the development of treatment interventions. METHODS OH-SE, DF/A, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), self-perceived dental condition, satisfaction with general health, DHB, and socioeconomic status were assessed as a part of the Saxon Longitudinal Study in an adult sample (n = 309, 56.3% female, all Saxon secondary school 8th graders in 1987). The associations of OH-SE with these variables were examined by means of correlation, multiple linear regression analyses, and group comparisons. Significance (p), standardized regression coefficients (β), and effect size (Cohen's d) were calculated. RESULTS The correlation analyses revealed increased OH-SE to be accompanied by low levels of DF/A, high levels of OHRQoL, high levels of self-perceived dental condition, increased satisfaction with general health and socioeconomic status (all r ≥ 0.142; all p ≤ 0.013). In the regression analysis, OH-SE was mainly predicted by self-perceived dental condition and satisfaction with general health (R2 = 0.157) as well as by daily frequency of toothbrushing, OHRQoL, and socioeconomic status on a trend-level basis. In the group comparisons OH-SE was lower in participants with moderate for manifest DF/A and higher in individuals with higher OHRQoL, better self-perceived dental condition, increased satisfaction with general health, increased daily frequency of toothbrushing, more dental appointments, and above-average socioeconomic status (trend level; all t ≥ 1.57; p ≤ 0.059). CONCLUSIONS In this cross-sectional study, high levels of OH-SE were mainly predicted by general health as well as self-perceived dental condition. It was also associated with decreased DF/A, increased DHB, higher OHRQoL, and higher socioeconomic status. Future research should analyze these associations in longitudinal designs to address whether interventions focusing on adherence to good DHB improve (dental) health and thus OH-SE. This might be a promising approach, particularly in relation to the treatment of DF/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bantel
- Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Witold X Chmielewski
- Institute for Psychological Psychotherapy, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Faculty of Managerial and Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Görlitz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klimt F, Jacobi C, Brähler E, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Berth H. Insomnia symptoms in adulthood. Prevalence and incidence over 25 years. Sleep Med 2023; 109:240-244. [PMID: 37480825 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND Despite its high prevalence, little information is available about the course of insomnia symptoms over the life span. In this study, we analyzed the self-reported insomnia symptoms of the general population over more than 20 years, covering young up to middle adulthood. PATIENTS/METHODS Data from waves 12 to 32 of the Saxon Longitudinal Study (1996-2021), were analyzed. Based on data from the 12th wave, n = 115 adults (48 men (41.7%), 67 women (58.3%), Mage = 23.59, SD = 0.59) completed the G-Score Item #3 in the following 18 waves, thus forming the basis for our analyses. The G-Score Item #3 reads "In the last 12 months, have you had the following complaints? Please indicate how often they occurred - Insomnia". The G-Score Item #3 was dichotomized using a cut-off score of 2, and prevalence and incidence rates were calculated by gender. RESULTS The minimum prevalence rate was 23.48% (Mage = 32.11, SD = 0.40), and the maximum was 47.83% (Mage = 48.43, SD = 0.64), indicating an increase in insomnia symptoms with age. In most cases, no evidence was found for gender differences in prevalence rates. The incidence rates were 10.43% for the 1st year of follow-up and 8.7% for the 5th year and 6th year of follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study provides further evidence for the high prevalence rates of insomnia symptoms in the general population. As this study is the first epidemiological study of insomnia symptoms based on a single-item (screening) instrument, it should be rather seen as an extension than a replication of previous study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Klimt
- Technische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Clara Jacobi
- Technische Universität Dresden, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Disruption and Societal Change Center TUDiSC, 01217, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Elmar Brähler
- University Medical Center Mainz, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, 55131, Mainz, Germany; Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- University of Applied Science Zittau/Görlitz, Faculty of Management and Cultural Studies, 02826, Görlitz, Germany.
| | - Markus Zenger
- University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, 39576, Stendal, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Technische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmalbach B, Tibubos AN, Otten D, Hinz A, Decker O, Zenger M, Beutel ME, Brähler E. Regional differences in the assessment of depressive symptoms in the former German Democratic Republic and Federal Republic of Germany. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45:e426-e436. [PMID: 36866396 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The present study investigated regional differences in response behaviour for the Patient Health Quetionnaire-9. We tested for measurement invariance and differential item and test functioning between formerly divided East- and West-Germany: the former German Democratic Republic and Federal Republic of Germany. Diverging socialization experiences in socialist versus capitalist and collectivist versus individualist systems may affect culturally sensitive assessments of mental health. SUBJECT AND METHODS To test this empirically, we used factor analytic and item-response-theoretic frameworks, differentiating between East- and West-Germans by birthplace and current residence based on several representative samples of the German general population (n = 3 802). RESULTS Across all survey, we discovered slightly higher depression sum scores for East- versus West-Germans. The majority of items did not display differential item functioning-with a crucial exception in the assessment of self-harm tendencies. The scale scores were largely invariant exhibiting only small amounts of differential test functioning. Nonetheless, they made up on average about a quarter of the observed group differences in terms of effect magnitude. CONCLUSION We explore possible causes and discuss explanations for the item-level differences. Overall, analyses of East- and West-German depressive symptom developments in the wake of reunification are feasible and statistically grounded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | - Ana N Tibubos
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | - Daniëlle Otten
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Oliver Decker
- Else-Frenkel-Brunswik-Institute, University of Leipzig, Leipzig 04109, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Berlin 12101, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, Magdeburg 39114, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Manfred E Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Klimt F, Brähler E, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Berth H. [Psychometric Evaluation of a Single-Item-Screener for Sleep Disturbances]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2023; 73:240-245. [PMID: 36746182 DOI: 10.1055/a-1990-0651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sleep disturbances are one of the most prevalent health complaints in the general population. Thus, the need for validated screening instruments and prevention measures is high. The aim of the current study is to evaluate a potential single-item screening instrument and therefore, contribute to an improved early detection. METHODS Data from Saxony Longitudinal Study (SLS) is being analyzed. Based on data of 32nd wave (n=321, 172 women, 149 men, M age=48.42, SD=0.64), the G-Score Item #3 ("Have you had the following complaints in the last 12 months? Please indicate how often they occurred. - sleeplessness"), a potential screening instrument, is psychometrically evaluated. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Analysis is calculated to assess the predictive validity of the G-Score Item #3. RESULTS Retestreliability for the G-Score Item #3 is 0.70 (p<0.001). Correlation with the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS) was r=0.79 (p<0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) is 0.92, providing evidence for a very good predictive validity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION This study provides evidence for the use of the G-Score Item #3 as a screening instrument for sleep disturbances by showing good psychometric properties and brevity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Klimt
- Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Fakultät Management und Kulturwissenschaften, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz, Deutschland
| | - Markus Zenger
- Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Deutschland
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hofmeister D, Schulte T, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Geue K, Zenger M, Esser P, Götze H, Hinz A. The association between sleep problems and general quality of life in cancer patients and in the general population. Front Psychol 2022; 13:960029. [PMID: 36591026 PMCID: PMC9800265 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective It is well-known that patients with cancer frequently experience sleep problems, and that sleep quality is associated with general quality of life (QoL). The aims of this study were to analyze the relationship between sleep problems and other components of QoL in more detail and to investigate sex and age differences in sleep quality in cancer patients in comparison with the general population. Method This study comprised one general population sample (n = 4,476) and eight samples with cancer patients (n between 323 and 4,020). Sleep Quality was measured using the QoL questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30. Results All of the cancer patient groups reported more sleep problems than the general population. Sleep problems were associated with all facets of QoL both in cancer patients and in the general population. The highest associations were found in cancer patients for fatigue (r = 0.52) and emotional functioning (r = -0.47). The association between sleep quality and general QoL was lower in the cancer samples (r = -0.37) than in the general population (r = -0.46). Female cancer patients reported markedly more sleep problems than male patients did (d = 0.45), while this sex difference was lower in the general population (d = 0.15). In contrast to the general population, younger cancer patients had greater trouble sleeping than older patients did (d = -0.17). Conclusion The results underline the significance of the role mental factors play in sleep problems. Health care providers should pay special attention to female patients and younger patients concerning this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Hofmeister
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Schulte
- Rehabilitation Clinic Bad Oexen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kristina Geue
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Esser
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Heide Götze
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany,*Correspondence: Andreas Hinz,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khachatryan K, Beutel ME, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Berth H, Brähler E, Schmidt P. Are Attitudes towards COVID-19 Pandemic Related to Subjective Physical and Mental Health? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:14538. [PMID: 36361419 PMCID: PMC9656892 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between a person's psychological distress, subjective physical health and their attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic. The evaluation was performed on the basis of data from two waves of the Saxon Longitudinal Study, carried out in 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2021. The number of study participants in both waves was 291. We tested in autoregressive cross-lagged models the stability of the respondents' health status before and during the pandemic and reviewed their influence on attitudes towards COVID-19. Our results show that COVID-19-related concerns are controlled by subjective physical health, while pandemic denial is linked to psychological distress. In an unknown and critical situation, with limited control over the situation, the strategy of avoidance or suppression may be used by individuals for protection by psychologically downplaying the stressor and danger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Khachatryan
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Manfred E. Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Faculty of Managerial and Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Furstr. 3, 02826 Görlitz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Osterburger Str. 25, 39576 Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases—Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Philipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Schmidt
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Political Science and the Centre of International Development and Environment (ZEU), University of Giessen, Karl-Glöckner-Straße 21E, 35394 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hinz A, Zenger M, Schmalbach B, Brähler E, Hofmeister D, Petrowski K. Quality of Life Domains in Breast Cancer Survivors: The Relationship Between Importance and Satisfaction Ratings. Front Psychol 2022; 13:923537. [PMID: 35814141 PMCID: PMC9257209 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Quality of life (QoL) has been the focus of increasing interest in oncology. QoL assessment instruments implicitly assume that each QoL domain has the same meaning for each patient. The objective of this study was to analyze the importance of and the satisfaction with QoL domains and to analyze the relationship between the two. Methods A sample of 308 breast cancer survivors was examined twice with a three-month time interval. The women completed the two QoL questionnaires Questions of Life Satisfaction (FLZ-M), which measures participants' satisfaction with eight QoL domains and the subjective importance of those domains to them, and the EORTC QLQ-C30. A sample of 1,143 women from the general population served as controls. Results Compared with the general population sample, the patients were less satisfied with their health and more satisfied with all other QoL domains. The subjective importance of health was lower in the patients' sample (Effect size: d = 0.38). Satisfaction with health and importance of health were slightly positively correlated (r between 0.05 and 0.08). The effect of QoL domain importance on general QoL was small (beta between −0.05 and 0.11), and interaction effects between domain importance and satisfaction on the prediction of global QoL were negligible. Conclusion In addition to satisfaction with QoL dimensions, the subjective importance of these dimensions is relevant for psychooncological research and treatment. Health is not the only relevant QoL domain in breast cancer survivors, other domains such as finances also deserve health care providers' attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- *Correspondence: Andreas Hinz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Dirk Hofmeister
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kliem S, Zenger M, Beller J, Brähler E, Ernst M. [Psychometric Properties of a Short Alexithymia Scale (SAS-3) in the German General Population]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2022; 72:329-334. [PMID: 35584777 DOI: 10.1055/a-1785-5644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The literature on alexithymia has multiplied in recent decades as the construct has important implications for mental health. The so far used inventories are of limited use in epidemiological research, primary care, and other clinical settings where time and effort are important factors in assessment. Based on items of the authorized German version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the aim of this study was to develop an ultra-short questionnaire for a condensed and unidimensional assessment of alexithymia. METHODS Criteria for the abbreviated scale were: (a) one-dimensionality (necessary to calculate a global score), (b) one item from each of the originally postulated dimensions, and (c) no reverse-coded items (to avoid method artifacts). Data were drawn from two nationwide representative population surveys in Germany: a survey conducted in 1996 to develop the SAS-3 (N=2.047); and a survey conducted in 2013 (N=2.508) for the evaluation and calculation of SAS-3 percentiles. RESULTS Reasonable correlations between the SAS-3 and the PHQ-2, the GAD-2, and the GBB-8 were observed. Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, the one-dimensionality of the SAS-3 could be confirmed, achieving very good fit indices. An additional invariance analysis regarding gender and different age groups resulted in (partial) strict invariance for the different multi-group analyses. Percentile ranks for SAS-3 sum score are reported stratified by gender and by age groups. CONCLUSIONS The SAS-3 appears to be suitable in epidemiological research and other instances requiring an economical assessment of alexithymia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sören Kliem
- Fachbereich für Sozialwissenschaften, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Magdeburg, Germany.,Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Adipositaserkrankungen, Forschungsbereich Verhaltensmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Lepzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Beller
- Medizinische Soziologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mareike Ernst
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Werner AM, Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Brähler E, Hinz A, Kruse J, Kampling H. Measuring physical, cognitive, and emotional aspects of exhaustion with the BOSS II-short version - results from a representative population-based study in Germany. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:579. [PMID: 35331192 PMCID: PMC8943994 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12961-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the present study was the construction and psychometric evaluation of a shortened version of the Burnout Screening Scales II (BOSS II), a measure for exhaustion and burnout. Methods To this end, among a representative sample of the German general population (N = 2429, 52.9% women), we shortened the scale from 30 to 15 items applying ant-colony-optimization, and calculated item statistics of the short version (BOSS II-short). To estimate its reliability, we used McDonald’s Omega (ω). To demonstrate validity, we compared the correlation between the BOSS II-short and the BOSS II, as well as their associations with depression, anxiety, and quality of life. Furthermore, we evaluated model fit and measurement invariance across respondent age and gender in confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Finally, we present adapted norm values. Results The CFA showed an excellent model fit (χ2 = 223.037, df = 87, p < .001; CFI = .975; TLI = .970; RMSEA [90%CI] = .036 [.031;.040]) of the BOSS II-short, and good to very good reliability of the three subscales: ‘physical’ (ω = .76), ‘cognitive’ (ω = .89), and ‘emotional’ (ω = .88) symptoms. There was strict measurement invariance for male and female participants and partial strict invariance across age groups. Each subscale was negatively related to quality of life (‘physical’: r = −.62; ‘cognitive’: r = −.50; ‘emotional’: r = −.50), and positively associated with depression (‘physical’: r = .57; ‘cognitive’: r = .67; ‘emotional’: r = .73) and anxiety (‘physical’: r = .50; ‘cognitive’: r = .63; ‘emotional’: r = .71). Conclusions Overall, the BOSS II-short proved to be a valid and reliable instrument in the German general population allowing a brief assessment of different symptoms of exhaustion. Norm values can be used for early detection of exhaustion. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12961-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia M Werner
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany. .,Department of Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Magdeburg, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Kruse
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Kampling
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Petrowski K, Zenger M, Schmalbach B, Bastianon CD, Strauss B. Psychometric properties and validation of the English version Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-8). BMC Psychol 2022; 10:60. [PMID: 35277201 PMCID: PMC8917714 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00741-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the newly developed English version of the Giessen Subjective Complaint List-8 (GBB-8), a questionnaire assessing psychosomatic symptoms with regard to exhaustion, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and cardiovascular. Methods A U.S. sample of 638 participants (47.6% female) was recruited by MTurk to participate in this cross-sectional online survey. Validation instruments included the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, Perceived Stress Scale, short version of the Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress. Results Reliability was high with ω’s between .80 and .86 for all subscales. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded comparable good model fit for a four-dimensional model as well as a higher order model. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses confirmed measurement invariance of the GBB-8 across sex and age. Regarding convergent validity, correlations with other instruments were highly significant and of large magnitude as expected. Conclusion The English version of the GBB-8 has shown excellent psychometric properties. Therefore, it can be recommended for the assessment of psychosomatic complaints in contexts where short screening instruments are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Petrowski
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christina Diane Bastianon
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bernhard Strauss
- Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kasinger C, Otten D, Stöbel-Richter Y, Beutel M, Zenger M, Brähler E, Berth H. [Internal Migration and Mental Health - Relevant Factors 20 and 30 years after Unification: Results of a Longitudinal Study in German]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2021; 72:199-206. [PMID: 34820821 DOI: 10.1055/a-1662-5395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Aim The aim of the present study was to determine the relevant factors in the mental health of people who experienced internal migration in comparison with people who did not. Methods Data from a longitudinal study in Saxony were used to compare the psychological distress of individuals who migrated internally with that of those who did not in 2010 and 2020. Bootstrapping-based mediation analysis was applied to examine possible mediators between internal migration and mental health.Results Individuals who experienced internal migration reported less mental distress compared to those who did not in 2010, but not in 2020, but these effects disappeared after including covariates and mediators. Important mediators in 2010 were life situation, political solidarity with FRG, winner of German Unification and job security; in 2020, these were threat of old-age poverty and experiences with system.Discussion Internal migration influences mental distress through different factors. Especially the current life circumstances play a crucial role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kasinger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Danielle Otten
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Gesundheitswissenschaften, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz, Zittau, Deutschland
| | - ManfredE Beutel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Markus Zenger
- Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Magdeburg, Deutschland.,Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Adipositas Erkrankungen - Verhaltensmedizin, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Medizinische Fakultät, Technische Universitat Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Berth H, Zenger M, Stöbel-Richter Y, Brähler E. Westwärts und nicht vergessen. Innerdeutsche Migration und psychosoziale Folgen 1990 - 2020. Das Gesundheitswesen 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Berth
- TU Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie
| | - M Zenger
- Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften - Rehabilitationspsychologie
| | - Y Stöbel-Richter
- Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz, Fakultät Management- und Kulturwissenschaften
| | - E Brähler
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fleischer T, Ulke C, Speerforck S, Gfesser T, Mühlan H, Glaesmer H, Fegert JM, Zenger M, Ladwig KH, Beutel ME, Brähler E, Schomerus G. East vs. West: Differences in the prevalence of child maltreatment in Germany before the reunification. Das Gesundheitswesen 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Fleischer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald
| | - C Ulke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center
| | - S Speerforck
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center
| | - T Gfesser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center
| | - H Mühlan
- Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald
| | - H Glaesmer
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig
| | - JM Fegert
- Department for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm
| | - M Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal
| | - K-H Ladwig
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg
| | - ME Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
| | - E Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
| | - G Schomerus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hilbert A, Zenger M, Luck-Sikorski C, Brähler E. Weight Stigma and Disease and Disability Concepts of Obesity: A Survey of the German Population. Obes Facts 2021; 14:463-470. [PMID: 34461612 PMCID: PMC8546454 DOI: 10.1159/000516494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent years have witnessed a medicalization of obesity, promoting a classification as a disease or disability in order to reduce or protect against weight stigma and discrimination. This study sought to investigate the public understanding of the disability and disease concepts in obesity, their acceptance, and association with weight stigma. METHODS In a representative German population sample (n = 2,524), public views of obesity as a disease or disability were assessed via a self-report questionnaire. For the assessment of weight stigma, the Weight Control/Blame subscale from the Antifat Attitudes Test was used. RESULTS A significantly greater acceptance of the disease than the disability concept was found (37.1 vs. 15.4%). Both disease and disability were mainly viewed as physical conditions, although one-third also viewed obesity as a mental disease. While agreement with the disease concept - especially of physical and genetic disease - significantly predicted lower weight stigma; agreement with the disability concept - especially of mental or intellectual disability - predicted higher weight stigma. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest a careful use of the disease and disability terms and precise definitions. The disability concept in particular carries notions that are publicly devalued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Hilbert
- Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | | | - Elmar Brähler
- Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmalbach B, Schmalbach I, Kasinger C, Petrowski K, Brähler E, Zenger M, Stöbel-Richter Y, Richter EP, Berth H. Psychological and Socio-Economical Determinants of Health: The Case of Inner German Migration. Front Public Health 2021; 9:691680. [PMID: 34268291 PMCID: PMC8275934 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.691680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A substantial body of research has shown worse health conditions for East- vs. West-Germany in the wake of reunification. In the present study, we investigate how these differences between the two formerly divided regions developed and what maintains them. Specifically, we consider the associations between health status, income satisfaction, and health-related locus of control. In a quasi-experimental and longitudinal study design, we are particularly interested in the differences between individuals who stayed in East-Germany and those who were born in the East but migrated to West-Germany. To this end, we examined data from seven waves of the Saxony Longitudinal Study (2003-2009). Specifically, we tested a cross-lagged panel model with random effects, which evinced very good model fit. Most parameters and processes were equivalent between individuals who stayed in East-Germany vs. moved to West-Germany. Crucially, there was the expected pattern of positive correlations between health, income, and locus of control. In addition, we found substantially lower values for all three of these variables for the individuals who stayed in East-Germany (vs. moved to West-Germany). A possible explanation is the increase in socio-economic status that the internal migrants experienced. These findings present an important contribution of research in order to foster a better understanding on the social dynamics in Germany related to internal/domestic migrants and implications in the context of health outcomes (e.g., significantly more unemployment in East vs. West-Germany), especially since almost 20-25% of East-German citizens migrated to West-Germany. Until now, there are no similar studies to the Saxony longitudinal project, since the data collection started in 1987 and almost every year an identical panel has been surveyed; which can be particularly useful for health authorities. The study mainly focuses on social science research and deals with the phenomenon of reunification, approaching several subjects such as mental and physical health, quality of life and the evaluation of the political system. Yet even though many people have experienced such a migration process, there has been little research on the subjects we approach. With our research we deepen the understanding of the health consequences of internal migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ileana Schmalbach
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Research Group Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph Kasinger
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Faculty of Managerial and Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Görlitz, Germany
| | - Ernst Peter Richter
- Research Group Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Research Group Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Petrowski K, Albani C, Zenger M, Brähler E, Schmalbach B. Revised Short Screening Version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) From the German General Population. Front Psychol 2021; 12:631668. [PMID: 34135805 PMCID: PMC8200627 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of constructing and validating a short form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS). The POMS is a widely-applied measure for the assessment of an individual's mood. Thus, it is of great relevance for many research questions in clinical and social psychology. To develop the short scale, we first examined psychometric properties and found the optimal 16-item solution among all valid combinations of the full POMS in an exploratory subsample (n = 1,029) of our complete representative sample of the German general population. We then validated this model in a confirmatory subsample (n = 977). Additionally, we examined its invariance across age groups and sex, as well as its reliability. Our results indicate that the POMS-16 is a valid and reliable measure of mood states with minimal losses compared to the 35-item version. Particularly where brevity and an economical assessment is desired, the POMS-16 should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Carl Gustav Carus at the University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Cornelia Albani
- Schussental Clinic, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Aulendorf, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) AdiposityDiseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) AdiposityDiseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hinz A, Zenger M, Leuteritz K, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Petrowski K. Do patients suffering from chronic diseases retrospectively overestimate how healthy they were before they fell ill? Int J Clin Health Psychol 2021; 21:100230. [PMID: 33995538 PMCID: PMC8091885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Objective: To examine the impact of a disease on a person's subjective health state, patients are often asked to assess their current health state and to retrospectively assess how healthy they were before they fell ill. The objective of this study was to test whether patients generally overestimated the quality of their pre-disease health. Method: Six samples of patients with chronic diseases (cancer patients, cardiovascular patients, and patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis, N between 197 and 1,197) were analyzed. The patients assessed their current health states and their health states at the time before diagnosis. The retrospective scores were compared with matched data from general population studies. Results: In three of the six studies, the retrospective health ratings of the patients were significantly higher than the general population norms (effect sizes between 0.24 and 0.46), two studies yielded nonsignificant effects, and in one study there was an opposite trend. The general overestimation of pre-disease health was more pronounced in older patients as compared with younger ones, and it was more pronounced when global health/quality of life was to be assessed. Conclusions: Retrospective assessments of pre-disease health states are not appropriate for assessing disease-related changes in a person's health state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Katja Leuteritz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Klein E, Zenger M, Tibubos A, Ernst M, Reiner I, Schmalbach B, Brähler E, Beutel M. Loneliness and its relation to mental health in the general population: Validation and norm values of a brief measure. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
21
|
Hinz A, Schulte T, Finck C, Gómez Y, Brähler E, Zenger M, Körner A, Tibubos AN. Psychometric evaluations of the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), based on nine samples. Psychol Health 2021; 37:767-779. [PMID: 33754894 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1892111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine psychometric properties of the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The LOT-R was administered in five clinical samples, three samples of the adult general population, and one sample of adolescents. Seven of the studies were performed in Germany and two in Colombia. All of the sample sizes were above 300. RESULTS Cronbach's alpha coefficients were between .57 and .75 for the eight adult samples, the correlations between the scales optimism and pessimism ranged from -.05 to -.37, and the coefficients of temporal stability (test-retest correlations) of the scales ranged from .43 to .69. There were no systematic age and gender effects observed in the nine studies. While the one-factor model of confirmatory factor analyses showed clearly insufficient fit indices among all of the samples, the two-factor model fit was markedly better. CONCLUSIONS The LOT-R proved to be a suitable instrument for measuring dispositional optimism in patients and in the general population, though the sum score should be viewed with caution. Studies comparing the LOT-R mean scores of different samples need not take age and gender distributions into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Schulte
- Rehabilitation Clinic Bad Oexen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Carolyn Finck
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Yvonne Gómez
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Annett Körner
- Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Ana-Nanette Tibubos
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schmalbach I, Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Petrowski K, Beutel M, Hilbert A, Brähler E. Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Self-Regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Front Psychol 2021; 12:649867. [PMID: 33776874 PMCID: PMC7994521 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Self-Regulation of Eating Behavior Questionnaire (SREBQ) is an economical way of assessing an individual's self-regulatory abilities regarding eating behavior. Such scales are needed in the German population; therefore, the purpose of the present study was the translation and validation of a German version of the SREBQ. Method: First, we conducted a pilot study (Study 1; N = 371) after the translation procedure. Second, we assessed the final scale in a representative sample of the German population (Sample 2; N = 2,483) and its underlying factor structure. Further, we tested for measurement invariance and evaluated the SREBQ's associations with related scales to explore convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, we considered differences in SREBQ based on sociodemographic variables and provided derived reference scores (norm values). Results: Factor analysis revealed deficiencies in the original model. Thus, we shortened the scale based on statistical considerations and the adapted version showed improved fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis and reliability. We also found evidence for partial strict invariance, which means the measure is equivalent for the tested groups of age and gender. Item and scale psychometric properties of the shortened version were satisfactory. In terms of diagnostic validity, it was shown that individuals with higher body mass index (kg/m2) have worse self-regulation of eating behavior than those with lower. Conclusion: In sum, the SREBQ evidenced good validity and reliability and is suitable for application in medical, psychological, and nutritional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ileana Schmalbach
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Technische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Abteilung für Innere Medizin III, Dresden, Germany
| | - Manfred Beutel
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anja Hilbert
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.,Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hinz A, Schulte T, Rassler J, Zenger M, Geue K. Temporal stability of quality of life assessments in cancer patients. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5191. [PMID: 33664409 PMCID: PMC7933346 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84681-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome criterion in cancer research and practice. Multiple studies have been performed to test the short-term temporal stability (1 day–2 weeks) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30, but its stability over longer periods of time is largely unknown. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was administered at two time points between 3 and 12 months apart in six samples of cancer patients with varying characteristics (N between 298 and 923). Averaged across the six samples, the coefficients of temporal stability (intra-class correlation coefficients ICC) were between 0.31 and 0.59 for the single scales. The 2-item global health/QoL scale showed a mean coefficient of 0.44. When the stability coefficients were calculated separately for males and females and for younger vs. older patients, no systematic gender or age differences were found in the temporal stability of the QoL scales, though the stability was slightly higher in males (vs. females) and in older subgroups (vs. younger subgroups). It is nearly impossible to predict the course a cancer patients’ QoL will take over a several month period. Repeated measurements are necessary to track QoL developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Thomas Schulte
- Rehabilitation Clinic Bad Oexen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Jörg Rassler
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Magdeburg, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kristina Geue
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Michaelides MP, Schermelleh-Engel K, Hinz A, Körner A, Beutel ME, Decker O, Kliem S, Brähler E. From Bi-Dimensionality to Uni-Dimensionality in Self-Report Questionnaires. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2021. [DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Abstract. The common factor model – by far the most widely used model for factor analysis – assumes equal item intercepts across respondents. Due to idiosyncratic ways of understanding and answering items of a questionnaire, this assumption is often violated, leading to an underestimation of model fit. Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006) suggested the introduction of a random intercept into the model to address this concern. The present study applies this method to six established instruments (measuring depression, procrastination, optimism, self-esteem, core self-evaluations, and self-regulation) with ambiguous factor structures, using data from representative general population samples. In testing and comparing three alternative factor models (one-factor model, two-factor model, and one-factor model with a random intercept) and analyzing differential correlational patterns with an external criterion, we empirically demonstrate the random intercept model’s merit, and clarify the factor structure for the above-mentioned questionnaires. In sum, we recommend the random intercept model for cases in which acquiescence is suspected to affect response behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases – Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Annett Körner
- Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Manfred E. Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Oliver Decker
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sören Kliem
- Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena – University of Applied Sciences, Jena, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hilbert A, Zenger M, Eichler J, Brähler E. Psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire when used in adults: Prevalence estimates for symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and population norms. Int J Eat Disord 2021; 54:399-408. [PMID: 33283329 DOI: 10.1002/eat.23424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Restrictive eating behaviors occur across ages, but little is known about symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), especially in adults. This study sought to examine the prevalence of symptoms of ARFID in the adult population, providing a psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire (EDY-Q) and population norms. METHOD In a representative survey of the German population, N = 2,424 adults (1,297 women, 1,127 men; age 49.5 ± 17.5 years) were assessed with the EDY-Q and measures of eating disorder and general psychopathology for divergent validation. RESULTS The point prevalence of self-reported symptoms of ARFID amounted to 0.8% (20/2,424), with 0.8% of women (10/1,297) and 0.9% of men (10/1,127) being affected. Adults with symptoms of ARFID were significantly more likely to have underweight or normal weight, were more likely to report restrictive behaviors and lower levels of eating disorder psychopathology and binge eating than noneating-disordered controls and adults with symptoms of an eating disorder, but did not significantly differ in levels of compensatory behaviors, or depression and anxiety. The EDY-Q revealed favorable item statistics, heterogeneity, and satisfactory construct validity, including factorial, discriminant, and divergent validity. Weight-status specific norms were provided. DISCUSSION Both women and men from the population reported symptoms of ARFID with an anthropometric and psychopathological profile similar to that seen in youth with symptoms of ARFID, however, with lower prevalence estimates, and distinctive from that in other eating disorders. Interview-based assessment of this symptomatology is required to confirm the prevalence of ARFID diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Hilbert
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.,Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Janina Eichler
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Nanette Tibubos A, Borkenhagen A, Strauss B, Brähler E. The Narcissistic Personality Inventory 8: Validation of a Brief Measure of Narcissistic Personality. Int J Psychol Res (Medellin) 2020; 13:68-77. [PMID: 33329879 PMCID: PMC7735512 DOI: 10.21500/20112084.4855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of constructing and validating a short form of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI). The NPI is the most widely-applied measure for the assessment of narcissistic personality traits and, therefore, it is of great relevance for many research questions in personality and social psychology. To develop the short scale, we first found the optimal eight-item solution among all valid combinations of the NPI-15 items in an exploratory subsample (n = 1, 165) of our complete representative sample of the German general population. We then validated this model in a confirmatory subsample (n = 1, 126). Additionally, we examined its invariance across age groups and sex, as well as its reliability, as well as construct and predictive validity -comparing it to the NPI-15. Our results indicate that the NPI-8 is a valid and reliable measure of narcissistic personality with minimal losses compared to the 15-item version. Particularly where brevity and an economical assessment are desired, the NPI-8 should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- . Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Hochschule Mainz Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- . Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany. Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal Stendal Germany.,. Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany. University of Leipzig Medical Center Leipzig Germany
| | - Ana Nanette Tibubos
- . Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Hochschule Mainz Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany
| | - Ada Borkenhagen
- . University Hospital for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. University of Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany
| | - Bernhard Strauss
- . University Hospital Jena, Institute of Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany University of Jena Jena Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- . Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Hochschule Mainz Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Mainz Germany.,. Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schmalbach I, Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Berth H, Albani C, Petrowski K, Brähler E. A Brief Assessment of Body Image Perception: Norm Values and Factorial Structure of the Short Version of the FKB-20. Front Psychol 2020; 11:579783. [PMID: 33335498 PMCID: PMC7736636 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The Body Image Questionnaire-20 (FKB-20) is one of the most applied self-report measures in the context of body image assessment in German-speaking regions. A version of the FKB-20 capturing an ideal concept of body image is also available. A special property of the scale is its high sensitivity for individuals suffering from anorexia nervosa. The present research provided a short version of this scale (for both variants) and examined its validity in a representative sample (N = 2,347) of the German population. We utilized factor analysis methods to identify the optimal short scale of the measure, finding excellent model fit and reliability for a two-factor model (FKB-6) for both real and ideal body image. Both versions of the FKB-6 can be considered invariant across sex and age groups. Good reliability indices were shown for both versions of the FKB-6. The reliability indices were similar to those mentioned in previous studies. Our study also revealed, that large discrepancies between the real and an ideal body image are correlated with somatic and body dysmorphic symptoms. Finally, we provided norm values for comparisons of individual scores with the general population. The FKB-6 is a valid and a reliable measure that economizes assessments by clinicians and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ileana Schmalbach
- Technische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases – Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Technische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Cornelia Albani
- Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases – Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Heller A, Decker O, Schmalbach B, Beutel M, Fegert JM, Brähler E, Zenger M. Detecting Authoritarianism Efficiently: Psychometric Properties of the Screening Instrument Authoritarianism - Ultra Short (A-US) in a German Representative Sample. Front Psychol 2020; 11:533863. [PMID: 33329171 PMCID: PMC7732445 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.533863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
With right-wing-extremist and -populist parties and movements on the rise throughout the world, the concept of authoritarianism has proven to be particularly valuable to explain the psychological underpinnings of these tendencies. Even though many scales to measure the different dimensions of authoritarianism exist, no short screening instrument has been tested and validated on a large scale so far. The present study examines the psychometric properties of the screening instrument Authoritarianism - Ultrashort (A-US) in three representative German samples (n = 2,524, n = 2,478, and n = 2,495). Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the A-US demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. Model fit was good and correlations with related constructs indicated convergent validity in both samples. Construct validity was demonstrated using the original version of the scale. The instrument proved to be invariant across sex, employment status, and education, but not across different age groups. Finally, the analyses showed that differences in the A-US are associated with sociodemographic variables. Potential causes and effects of these findings are discussed. Based on these results, the A-US proved to be a valuable and highly efficient tool to screen for authoritarian tendencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayline Heller
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Oliver Decker
- Centre for the Study of Right-Wing Extremism and Democracy and Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jörg M. Fegert
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Centre for the Study of Right-Wing Extremism and Democracy and Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases – Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Richter EP, Brähler E, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Berth H. The long-lasting impact of unemployment on life satisfaction: results of a longitudinal study over 20 years in East Germany. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:361. [PMID: 33168007 PMCID: PMC7652576 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01608-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Economic disruption in East Germany at the time of reunification (1990) resulted in a noticeable increase in unemployment. The present study provides data from a German cohort for over 20 years. The aim was to examine how the frequency of experiencing unemployment affects life satisfaction and whether their relationship changes over time. METHODS In the Saxon Longitudinal Study, an age-homogeneous sample was surveyed annually from 1987 to 2016. Since 1996, 355 people (54% female) have been examined for issues related to unemployment. Life satisfaction was measured with both the Global Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Questions on Life SatisfactionModules questionnaire. RESULTS In 1996, the participants were 23 years old and 50% of the sample was affected by unemployment. At all 16 different measuring points, participants who were never unemployed indicated higher life satisfaction than those who were once unemployed. The repeatedly unemployed consistently reported the lowest values of life satisfaction. In each year, there were significant differences with small to medium effect sizes. CONCLUSION Our results support the notion that the adverse effects of unemployment on life satisfaction increase with the time spent unemployed. In 2016, only 2% of the cohort were currently unemployed, but differences between people with and without unemployment experience still exist. This indicates that the negative effect of the unemployment experience will last for a very long time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates the effect so persistently at so many measurement points for over 20 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst Peter Richter
- Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Universität Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Faculty of Managerial and Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Brückenstraße 1, 02826 Görlitz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Osterburger Str. 25, 39576 Stendal, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kliem S, Beller J, Tibubos AN, Zenger M, Schmalbach B, Brähler E. A reanalysis of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) using non-parametric item response theory. Psychiatry Res 2020; 290:113132. [PMID: 32521379 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The "Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale" (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) is a questionnaire used world-wide to measure depressive symptoms. Although the original four-factor-structure has been widely accepted and replicated, some studies point to other factor-structures like a one- and two-factor-structure. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the factor structure of the CES-D (one-, two- and four-factor-structure), which was found using classical test theory (CTT), with two non-parametric item-response-theory-models (Mokken-Scaling; Monotone-homogeneity-model; MHM and Double-monotonicity-model; DMM). To this end, a representative German sample was analyzed (N = 2,507). Regarding the one-factor-model, neither the MHM nor the DMM were supported; the two-factor-model and the four-factor-model, however, satisfied the assumptions of the MHM but not of the stricter DMM. Sum scores therefore constitute ordinal scales for the two-factor and four-factor-structure. This justifies, for example, the use of percentile ranks or medians and associated statistical techniques. Especially the use of the 16 negative formulated items seems appealing. Further studies should explore, whether the use of these 16 instead of the original 20 items is of advantage regarding the practical validity of the CES-D (e.g. higher sensitivity and specificity in screening applications and better temporal stability).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sören Kliem
- Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena - University of Applied Sciences, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Ana N Tibubos
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Petrowski K, Brähler E, Suslow T, Zenger M. Correction: Revised short screening version of the attachment questionnaire for couples from the German general population. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234228. [PMID: 32470097 PMCID: PMC7259723 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230864.].
Collapse
|
32
|
Schmalbach B, Roenneberg C, Hausteiner-Wiehle C, Henningsen P, Brähler E, Zenger M, Häuser W. Validation of the German version of the Bodily Distress Syndrome 25 checklist in a representative German population sample. J Psychosom Res 2020; 132:109991. [PMID: 32160574 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Bodily Distress Syndrome 25 (BDS 25) checklist is a self-report instrument that can be used for case finding of a BDS in both clinical practice and research. We assessed the reliability and the internal and external validity of the German version of the BDS 25 in a sample of the general German population. METHODS The psychometric properties of the BDS 25 German were examined in a representative cross-sectional German population survey which included 2386 persons aged ≥14 years. Validation instruments included the Somatic Symptom Scale 8, the Giessen Subjective Complaints List 8 and the Patient Health Questionnaire 4. Participants were asked if they had been diagnosed with fibromyalgia or irritable bowel syndrome by a physician in the past. RESULTS The acceptance was high. Only 81 (2.3%) single items were not answered. Internal consistency was sufficiently high for all four subscales and the total score (α > 0.800). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed clear evidence for a four-factorial structure with cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Moderate to high correlations with other measures of somatic and psychological symptom burden were found. In latent class analysis, the model featuring three classes with no, moderate and severe BDS symptoms evinced the best model fit. Participants with self-reported fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome were mainly found in the moderate and severe BDS group. CONCLUSIONS The BDS 25 German has excellent psychometric properties to screen for BDS in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Casper Roenneberg
- Department Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | - Peter Henningsen
- Department Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB), Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Winfried Häuser
- Department Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Riese F, Guloksuz S, Roventa C, Fair J, Haravuori H, Rolko T, Flynn D, Giacco D, Banjac V, Jovanovic N, Bayat N, Palumbo C, Rusaka M, Kilic O, Augėnaitė J, Nawka A, Zenger M, Kekin I, Wuyts P, Barrett E, Bausch-Becker N, Mikaliūnas J, del Valle E, Feffer K, Lomax G, Marques J, Jauhar S. Pharmaceutical industry interactions of psychiatric trainees from 20 European countries. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 30:284-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.09.417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2014] [Revised: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractBackground:Interactions between the pharmaceutical industry (PI) and psychiatrists have been under scrutiny recently, though there is little empirical evidence on the nature of the relationship and its intensity at psychiatry trainee level. We therefore studied the level of PI interactions and the underlying beliefs and attitudes in a large sample of European psychiatric trainees.Methods:One thousand four hundred and forty-four psychiatric trainees in 20 European countries were assessed cross-sectionally, with a 62-item questionnaire.Results:The total number of PI interactions in the preceding two months varied between countries, with least interactions in The Netherlands (M (Mean) = 0.92, SD = 1.44, range = 0–12) and most in Portugal (M = 19.06, SD = 17.44, range = 0–100). Trainees were more likely to believe that PI interactions have no impact on their own prescribing behaviour than that of other physicians (M = 3.30, SD = 1.26 vs. M = 2.39, SD = 1.06 on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 “completely disagree” to 5 “completely agree”). Assigning an educational role to the pharmaceutical industry was associated with more interactions and higher gift value (IRR (incidence rate ratio) = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.12–1.30 and OR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.02–1.37).Conclusions:There are frequent interactions between European psychiatric trainees and the PI, with significant variation between countries. We identified several factors affecting this interaction, including attribution of an educational role to the PI. Creating alternative educational opportunities and specific training dedicated to PI interactions may therefore help to reduce the impact of the PI on psychiatric training.
Collapse
|
34
|
Petrowski K, Brähler E, Suslow T, Zenger M. Revised short screening version of the attachment questionnaire for couples from the German general population. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230864. [PMID: 32240237 PMCID: PMC7117745 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to ensure the concentration, compliance and motivation of the participants, a short version of 12 items was extracted from the “Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire (ECR)”. Even though this short English version shows equally good validity and reliability as the long version, there have been no representative norm values and psychometric characteristics available for the short version in German. Therefore, the German 12-item ECR was implemented in a representative sample of 1,127 males and 1,237 females (mean age M = 49.93; SD = 12.31) from the general public (N = 2,364). The reliability values of the German 12-item ECR in the representative sample are not as good as the long version with the 36- items version (Alpha = .54–72), and the 12-item ECR factorial structure failed to show the factorial validity. Since the EFA revealed that only half the items loaded on the expected factors, an even shorter form with six items was construed and tested psychometrically. Even though the item numbers were reduced, the reliability values of the German 6-item ECR improved and were as good as the long version with 36 items (Alpha = .73–90). Furthermore, factorial validity could be shown by CFA (CFI = .981, SRMR = .038, RMSEA = .079, TLI = .964) with scalar invariance across gender and age. In sum, the 6-item ECR is a reliable and factorial scalar attachment questionnaire. Due to its shortness, it is applicable to different research fields. However, reference data from a clinical sample are still missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Mental Health University Medical Center of university of Leipzig, Germany, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Suslow
- Department of Mental Health University Medical Center of university of Leipzig, Germany, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) AdiposityDiseases—Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Halamová J, Kanovský M, Petrocchi N, Moreira H, López A, Barnett MD, Yang E, Benda J, Brähler E, Zeng X, Zenger M. Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 11 International Samples. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2020.1735203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Júlia Halamová
- Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Martin Kanovský
- Institute of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Nicola Petrocchi
- Department of Economics and Social Sciences, John Cabot University, Rome, Italy
| | - Helena Moreira
- Cognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Angélica López
- Department of Health Sciences, Health Psychology Section, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Michael D. Barnett
- Department of Psychology and Counseling, Memory Assessment and Research Center, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| | - Eunjoo Yang
- Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jan Benda
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Xianglong Zeng
- Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Brähler E, Petrowski K. Norm values and psychometric properties for the German health regulatory focus scale - results of a representative survey. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:51. [PMID: 32122330 PMCID: PMC7053077 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00927-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health regulatory focus is an application of Higgins' regulatory focus theory to a health-specific context. It explains individual differences in health motivation, strategies, and behavior. Previous research found the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS) to be a reliable and valid measure for the construct. However, an evaluation of the HRFS in a representative sample has not been performed as of yet. Neither are there any normative values available. METHODS We collected a representative sample from the German general population to perform a confirmatory factor analysis, an analysis of measurement invariance, and to calculate norm values. RESULTS A two-factor model evinced good model fit with a good reliability for the two subscales. We found evidence for strict invariance across gender groups and partial strict invariance across age groups. In addition, we are presenting normative values for the general population. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the present study are in line with previous research in confirming the HRFS as a valid and reliable tool suitable for the assessment of the health regulatory focus. The reported normative values allow for comparisons of individuals with their respective sociodemographic group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Osterburger Str. 25, 39576, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center AdiposityDiseases - Behavioral Medicine, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Saarstraße 21, 55099, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tibubos AN, Zenger M, Schmalbach B, Beutel ME, Brähler E. Measurement invariance, validation and normative data of the Jenkins Sleep Scale-4 (JSS-4) in the German general population across the life span. J Psychosom Res 2020; 130:109933. [PMID: 31951963 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As sleep disorders have become a major concern in public health, there is strong need for a brief and sound measure for sleep problems. The purposes of the study were to 1) evaluate factor structure and measurement invariance, 2) validate the scale based on sociodemographic data and distress, and 3) provide norm values for the general population. METHODS In a representative survey of the German population N = 2515 participants (14 to 95 years) filled in the 4-item Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS-4), sociodemographic questions and the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (anxiety, depression, somatic symptom load). The JSS-4 was analyzed by principal component analysis, confirmatory and multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. A multiple-indicator-multiple-cause model was tested to investigate the relationship of the JSS-4 to distress and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS The one-factor structure of JSS-4 was confirmed. Given the heterogeneity of facets of sleep problems captured in the four items, internal consistency of the JSS-4 was remarkably high. The JSS-4 was strictly invariant across both sexes, and partially strictly invariant across income groups and individuals living with or without a partner. With regard to the full age range, it showed partial scalar invariance. CONCLUSION Female sex, higher age, living without a partner, lower education, lower income and increased distress were associated with more sleep problems. Calculated normative data of sleep problems allow comparisons of JSS-4 scores stratified by sex and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Tibubos
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - M Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - B Schmalbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - M E Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - E Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hinz A, Benzing C, Brähler E, Zenger M, Herzberg PY, Finck C, Schmalbach B, Petrowski K. Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:717-723. [PMID: 31837450 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. METHODS The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample. RESULTS The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices. CONCLUSION The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Philipp Y Herzberg
- Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Finck
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hampel ND, Brähler E, Zenger M, Albani C, Heuft G. [Psychometric Properties of the Shortend Version of the Scale "Transpersonal Trust" in a Representative Sample of the German Population]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2019; 70:237-245. [PMID: 31822028 DOI: 10.1055/a-1033-7627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the present study was to show the development of the revised and shortened German version (6 items) of the scale "Transpersonales Vertrauen" (TPV-6R; 2017) as well as to examine its psychometric properties. METHODS In a representative German sample the questionnaire has been given to 2513 subjects. Collected data from 2464 subjects could be analysed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis has been made to prove the original one-factor model (Belschner, 2000) as well as the 2-factorial structure found by Albani et al. (2003). Measurement invariance was tested using multigroup analysis. Correlations were used to determine convergent and discriminant validity towards other items. RESULTS After excluding 2 items due to their unsatisfactory scale fit, the 4 item model showed good item and scale characteristics as well as excellent model fit. The one factorial structure of the original work of Belschner and colleagues (2000) could be replicated. Metric invariance could be shown for gender and age, partial scalar invariance could be only generated for gender. No metric or scalar invariance could be shown for federal state and denomination. DISCUSSION Due to the good psychometric properties of the TPV-4R questionnaire it should be further analyzed in future research with other validated instruments that are measuring spiritual or religious attitudes. CONCLUSIONS The new German short version, the TPV-4R, is an economic, reliable and valid questionnaire to measure spiritual attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universität Leipzig.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Universität Leipzig, Stendal.,Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum (IFB) AdipositasErkrankungen - Verhaltensmedizin, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig
| | - Cornelia Albani
- Fachkrankenhaus und Rehabilitationsklinik für Internistische Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, SINOVA Klinik Aulendorf.,Abteilung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie Donau- Riss, Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Bad Schussenried
| | - Gereon Heuft
- Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Abstract. The short form of the General Procrastination Scale (GPS-K; Klingsieck & Fries, 2012 ; Lay, 1986 ) is a reliable self-report scale measuring general procrastination. The presumed one-dimensional factor structure of the scale, however, has never been examined. Thus, the purposes of this representative study were to examine its dimensionality and factorial invariance across age and sex, and to provide norm values of the German general population. The GPS-K was administered to a representative community sample ( N = 2,527; age range 14–95 years). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. To explore convergent validity, standardized scales of distress and life satisfaction were used. Measurement invariance across sex and age was tested. The CFA revealed an unsatisfactory model fit of the presumed unidimensional factor structure of the GPS-K. Therefore, a 5-item one-dimensional version of the scale was suggested (General Procrastination Scale – Screening; GPS-S). Correlations between GPS-S, distress and reduced life satisfaction provide evidence on its convergent validity. The one-dimensional GPS-S can be assumed to be scalar invariant across sex and for participants older than 29 years. The scale can be administered in only a few minutes providing an economic screening for research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M. Klein
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred E. Beutel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Kai W. Müller
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Wölfling
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) AdiposityDiseases – Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schmalbach B, Tibubos AN, Zenger M, Hinz A, Brähler E. [Psychometric Evaluation and Norm Values of an Ultra-Short Version of the Sense of Coherence Scale "SOC-3"]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2019; 70:86-93. [PMID: 31315141 DOI: 10.1055/a-0901-7054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Sense of coherence is a psychological resource which contributes substantially to an individual's ability to cope well with stressful situations. In the present study we investigate an ultra-short form of the Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-3) in a representative sample of the German general population (N=2.018). The 3-item model evinced excellent model fit qualities and acceptable reliability. We present evidence for partial strict invariance across sex and age groups. In terms of construct validity, our analyses demonstrate strong overlap between the SOC-3 and two longer versions (-9 and -29). In addition, correlations to related constructs such as attachment styles, physical and mental health, as well as quality of life were similar between the SOC versions. For the first time, normative values for the German population are presented to allow for the classification of individual scores. We recommend the SOC-3 as a screener for applied sciences and for large-scale surveys in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Institut für Psychologie, WWU Münster.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - Ana Nanette Tibubos
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal.,Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum (IFB)AdipositasErkrankungen - Verhaltensmedizin, Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universität Leipzig
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.,Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universität Leipzig
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schmalbach B, Zenger M, Tibubos AN, Kliem S, Petrowski K, Brähler E. Psychometric Properties of Two Brief Versions of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist: HSCL-5 and HSCL-10. Assessment 2019; 28:617-631. [PMID: 31272193 DOI: 10.1177/1073191119860910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) is a widely applied measure of depression and anxiety. The present study examines two of its short forms-the HSCL-5 and HSCL-10, which have been proposed by previous research-in a representative sample of the German general population. To this end, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory analysis on two subsamples (n = 1,246 and n = 1,216). Our results suggest that, compared with the HSCL-25, both short forms represent economical ways of assessing depression and anxiety. Model fit was good and correlations with established measures demonstrate convergent validity. Both HSCL short forms are strongly invariant across sex, and we found evidence for partial strong invariance across age groups. Further analyses showed that differences in HSCL can be partially explained by sociodemographic variables. Finally, we report normative values for usage by researchers and clinicians. We recommend the HSCL-5 and HSCL-10 for clinical and research-oriented application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ana Nanette Tibubos
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sören Kliem
- Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Altmann U, Brähler E, Zenger M, Tibubos AN, Brenk-Franz K, Strauss B. Kurzversion des Bielefelder Fragebogens zu Partnerschaftserwartungen (BFPE-12). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie 2019. [DOI: 10.1026/1616-3443/a000546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die Kurzfassung des Bielefelder Fragebogens zu Partnerschaftserwartungen (BFPE-12) ist ein Selbstrating zur Messung partnerschaftsbezogener Bindungsaspekte. Neben der Messung der Dimensionen Akzeptanzprobleme, Öffnungsbereitschaft und Zuwendungsbedürfnis können Personen Bindungsmustern zugewiesen werden. Die vorliegende Studie evaluiert Faktorenstruktur und psychometrische Eigenschaften des Instruments anhand einer aktuellen bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Stichprobe. Die Stichprobe umfasst N = 1574 Personen. Es wurden soziodemographische Variablen, der BFPE-12, die Kurzform des Depressive Experiences Questionnaire Self-Criticism sowie der Patient Health Questionnaire-4 erhoben. Es wurden explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen durchgeführt und interne Konsistenz, Itemstatistiken und Korrelationen mit Außenkriterien bestimmt. Explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse bestätigten die angenommene Faktorenstruktur (RMSEA < .08). Die interne Konsistenz der drei Skalen war akzeptabel (α > .7). Starke Akzeptanzprobleme und geringe Öffnungsbereitschaft korrelierten hypothesenkonform mit Selbstkritik, Ängstlichkeit und Depressivität. z-Werte, t-Werte und Prozentränge werden berichtet. Insgesamt kann für den BFPE-12 konstatiert werden, dass er eine mehrfach evaluierte Faktorenstruktur und akzeptable psychometrische Eigenschaften aufweist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Altmann
- Institut für psychosoziale Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universität Leipzig
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal
- Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum (IFB) AdipositasErkrankungen, Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig
| | - Ana Nanette Tibubos
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
| | - Katja Brenk-Franz
- Institut für psychosoziale Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena
| | - Bernhard Strauss
- Institut für psychosoziale Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hampel ND, Brähler E, Zenger M, Albani C, Heuft G. [Psychometric Properties of the Shortend Version of the "Systems of Belief Inventory" in a Representative Sample of the German Population]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2019; 70:38-45. [PMID: 31013524 DOI: 10.1055/a-0865-2211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the present study was to show the development of the revised and shortened German version (6 items) of the "Systems of Belief Inventory" (SBI-6R-D) as well as to examine its psychometric properties. METHODS In a representative German sample the questionnaire has been given to 2513 subjects. A confirmatory factor analysis has been made to prove the original American factor structure. Measurement invariance was tested using multigroup analysis. Correlations were used to determine convergent and discriminant validity towards other items. RESULTS The SBI-6R-D showed good item and scale characteristics as well as good model fit. In difference to the work of Albani et al. (SBI-15R-D), the 2 factorial structure of the original American questionnaire could be replicated. Scalar invariance could be shown for gender and age, metric invariance for denomination and federal state. DISCUSSION Due to the good psychometric properties of the questionnaire it should be further analyzed in future research with other validated religious instruments. CONCLUSIONS The new German short version, the SBI-6R-D, is an economic, reliable and valid questionnaire to measure spiritual and religious attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universität Leipzig.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Universität Leipzig, Stendal.,Integriertes Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum (IFB) Adipositas Erkrankungen - Verhaltensmedizin, Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig
| | | | - Gereon Heuft
- Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schmalbach B, Tibubos AN, Hinz A, Zenger M, Brähler E. Measuring Illness Behavior in One Minute. European Journal of Health Psychology 2019. [DOI: 10.1027/2512-8442/a000028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract. The present study addresses shortcomings in previous psychometric research into the Scale for the Assessment of Illness Behavior (SAIB) and develops a short form, the SAIB-10. We used ant-colony optimization to construct a subset of items in an exploratory sample ( n = 1,187) and affirmed it in factor analysis in a confirmatory sample ( n = 1,208). We find excellent model fit and evidence for strict invariance across sex and age. As expected, there were associations with distressed personality, perceived social support, and mental health. Finally, we report normative values for usage by researchers and clinicians. In sum, the SAIB-10 is an economical measure of illness behavior and recommended as a screening tool or for large-scale surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Ana Nanette Tibubos
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases – Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Preiß M, Friedrich M, Stolzenburg JU, Zenger M, Hinz A. Response shift effects in the assessment of urologic cancer patients' quality of life. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13027. [PMID: 30815952 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Urologic cancer patients often assess their quality of life (QoL) as being relatively good. Response shift (change in internal standards) may be one reason for that effect. The aim of this study was to test such response shift effects. METHODS A sample of 197 male urologic cancer patients was tested while hospitalised (t1) and three months later (t2). The participants had to assess their current health state and the health state of two anchoring vignettes. They also completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PHQ-4 questionnaires, including a retrospective thentest. The control sample was comprised of members of the general population. RESULTS The patients rated their general health as being worse than people from the general population did (effect size: d = 0.73, p < 0.001). Moreover, the patients assessed the vignette presenting physical problems as being significantly healthier than people from the general population did (d = 0.42, p < 0.001). Under the retrospective thentest condition, the patients rated their QoL and their mental burden as being significantly worse than in the pre-test condition. Both methods showed response shift effects. CONCLUSION Urologic cancer patients' assessments of their QoL should be handled with caution because of possible shifts in their internal standards of judgement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Preiß
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Smektala T, Zenger M, Morfeld M, Stöbel-Richter Y, Berth H, Brähler E. Predicting presenteeism via effort-reward imbalance and dispositional optimism: Is it the interaction that matters? Results from The Saxony Longitudinal Study. Work 2019; 61:589-601. [DOI: 10.3233/wor-182828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Smektala
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias Morfeld
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Yve Stöbel-Richter
- Faculty of Managerial und Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences, Görlitz, Germany
| | - Hendrik Berth
- Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Friedrich M, Zenger M, Hinz A. Response shift effects of quality of life assessments in breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 28:e12979. [PMID: 30520193 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Measurements of quality of life (QoL) can be distorted by respondents adapting to new situations between measurement points and consequently having a changed frame of reference. To investigate this bias in breast cancer survivors, we compare their QoL with that of the general population and use two complementary methods for detecting this bias. Breast cancer survivors (n = 308, response rate: 91%) were tested with the QoL questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Response shift was examined with the thentest (retrospective judgements) and with the structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. Compared with the general population, breast cancer survivors showed impaired QoL in all functioning scales (Hedges' g: -0.56 to -0.93) and symptom scales (Hedges' g: 0.28-0.74).The thentest method indicated recalibration effects in several dimensions including social functioning. The SEM method detected a non-uniform recalibration effect for social functioning from pretest to posttest and from pretest to thentest, but no effect between thentest and posttest. Breast cancer survivors' QoL is clearly diminished. Comparing the two approaches for detecting response shift showed that it is also useful to apply SEM to retrospective judgements and that this can reveal response shift effects that would otherwise be overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases - Behavioral Medicine, Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hinz A, Friedrich M, Kuhnt S, Zenger M, Schulte T. The influence of self-efficacy and resilient coping on cancer patients’ quality of life. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 28:e12952. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology; University of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology; University of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - Susanne Kuhnt
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology; University of Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies; University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal; Stendal Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases; Leipzig University Medical Center; Leipzig Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kocalevent RD, Berg L, Beutel ME, Hinz A, Zenger M, Härter M, Nater U, Brähler E. Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3). BMC Psychol 2018; 6:31. [PMID: 30016997 PMCID: PMC6050647 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-018-0249-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3) for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the factor structure in the general population. METHODS Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2008 (n = 2524). RESULTS Normative data for the Oslo Social Support Scale were generated for men and women (52.3% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 48.9 (18.3) years). Men had mean scores comparable to women (10.1 [SD = 2.3] vs. 10.2 [SD = 2.2]). The EFA resulted in a clear one-factor solution for the OSSS-3. CONCLUSIONS The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of social support with other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent
- Institute and Policlinic for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52, W26, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, W26, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lorenz Berg
- Institute and Policlinic for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52, W26, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Manfred E. Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Zenger
- Faculty of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Institute and Policlinic for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52, W26, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Urs Nater
- Department of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|