1
|
Luke JJ, Davar D, Andtbacka RH, Bhardwaj N, Brody JD, Chesney J, Coffin R, de Baere T, de Gruijl TD, Fury M, Goldmacher G, Harrington KJ, Kaufman H, Kelly CM, Khilnani AD, Liu K, Loi S, Long GV, Melero I, Middleton M, Neyns B, Pinato DJ, Sheth RA, Solomon SB, Szapary P, Marabelle A. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) recommendations on intratumoral immunotherapy clinical trials (IICT): from premalignant to metastatic disease. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008378. [PMID: 38641350 PMCID: PMC11029323 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intratumorally delivered immunotherapies have the potential to favorably alter the local tumor microenvironment and may stimulate systemic host immunity, offering an alternative or adjunct to other local and systemic treatments. Despite their potential, these therapies have had limited success in late-phase trials for advanced cancer resulting in few formal approvals. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to determine how to design clinical trials with the greatest chance of demonstrating the benefits of intratumoral immunotherapy for patients with cancers across all stages of pathogenesis. METHODS An Intratumoral Immunotherapy Clinical Trials Expert Panel composed of international key stakeholders from academia and industry was assembled. A multiple choice/free response survey was distributed to the panel, and the results of this survey were discussed during a half-day consensus meeting. Key discussion points are summarized in the following manuscript. RESULTS The panel determined unique clinical trial designs tailored to different stages of cancer development-from premalignant to unresectable/metastatic-that can maximize the chance of capturing the effect of intratumoral immunotherapies. Design elements discussed included study type, patient stratification and exclusion criteria, indications of randomization, study arm determination, endpoints, biological sample collection, and response assessment with biomarkers and imaging. Populations to prioritize for the study of intratumoral immunotherapy, including stage, type of cancer and line of treatment, were also discussed along with common barriers to the development of these local treatments. CONCLUSIONS The SITC Intratumoral Immunotherapy Clinical Trials Expert Panel has identified key considerations for the design and implementation of studies that have the greatest potential to capture the effect of intratumorally delivered immunotherapies. With more effective and standardized trial designs, the potential of intratumoral immunotherapy can be realized and lead to regulatory approvals that will extend the benefit of these local treatments to the patients who need them the most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason J Luke
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Diwakar Davar
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Nina Bhardwaj
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua D Brody
- Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jason Chesney
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - Thierry de Baere
- Center for Biotherapies In Situ (BIOTHERIS), INSERM CIC1428, Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Tanja D de Gruijl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthew Fury
- Oncology Clinical Development, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | | | - Kevin J Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Howard Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Ankyra Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ciara M Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Ke Liu
- Marengo Therapeutics, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Mark Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Rahul A Sheth
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Chief of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Professor of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Philippe Szapary
- Interventional Oncology, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Aurelien Marabelle
- Center for Biotherapies In Situ (BIOTHERIS), INSERM CIC1428, Department for Therapeutic Innovation and Early Phase Trials (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kwart D, He J, Srivatsan S, Lett C, Golubov J, Oswald EM, Poon P, Ye X, Waite J, Zaretsky AG, Haxhinasto S, Au-Yeung E, Gupta NT, Chiu J, Adler C, Cherravuru S, Malahias E, Negron N, Lanza K, Coppola A, Ni M, Song H, Wei Y, Atwal GS, Macdonald L, Oristian NS, Poueymirou W, Jankovic V, Fury M, Lowy I, Murphy AJ, Sleeman MA, Wang B, Skokos D. Cancer cell-derived type I interferons instruct tumor monocyte polarization. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111769. [PMID: 36476866 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Monocytes are highly plastic immune cells that modulate antitumor immunity. Therefore, identifying factors that regulate tumor monocyte functions is critical for developing effective immunotherapies. Here, we determine that endogenous cancer cell-derived type I interferons (IFNs) control monocyte functional polarization. Guided by single-cell transcriptomic profiling of human and mouse tumors, we devise a strategy to distinguish and separate immunostimulatory from immunosuppressive tumor monocytes by surface CD88 and Sca-1 expression. Leveraging this approach, we show that cGAS-STING-regulated cancer cell-derived IFNs polarize immunostimulatory monocytes associated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response in mice. We also demonstrate that immunosuppressive monocytes convert into immunostimulatory monocytes upon cancer cell-intrinsic cGAS-STING activation. Consistently, we find that human cancer cells can produce type I IFNs that polarize monocytes, and our immunostimulatory monocyte gene signature is enriched in patient tumors that respond to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Our work exposes a role for cancer cell-derived IFNs in licensing monocyte functions that influence immunotherapy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Kwart
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | - Jing He
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Poon
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | - Xuan Ye
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joyce Chiu
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Min Ni
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | - Hang Song
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | - Yi Wei
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Fury
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | - Israel Lowy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
| | | | | | - Bei Wang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lakhani N, Hamid O, Braña I, Reguera Puertas P, Lopez Criado M, Swiecicki P, De Miguel Luken M, Gil Martín M, Khong H, Moreno Garcia V, Lostes Bardaji M, Sun F, Sandigursky S, Zambrano M, Cristea M, Fury M. 196TiP A phase I study of REGN6569, a GITR monoclonal antibody (mAb), in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumour malignancies. Immuno-Oncology and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
4
|
Baramidze A, Gessner C, Gogishvili M, Sezer A, Makharadze T, Kilickap S, Gumus M, Tewari K, Monk B, de Melo A, Oaknin A, Li S, Gao B, Mathias M, Gullo G, Salvati M, Seebach F, Lowy I, Fury M, Rietschel P. 168P Liver metastases (mets) and treatment effect of cemiplimab-based therapy: An analysis from three phase III trials (EMPOWER-Lung 1, EMPOWER-Lung 3 part 2, and EMPOWER-Cervical 1). Immuno-Oncology and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
5
|
Lakhani N, Johnson M, Groisberg R, Han H, Casey K, Li S, Skokos D, Seebach F, Lowy I, Fury M, Mathias M. 535 A phase I/II study of REGN7075 (EGFRxCD28 costimulatory bispecific antibody) in combination with cemiplimab (anti–PD-1) in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundT-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are therapeutics that recognize two distinct antigens: a tumor-associated antigen on tumor cells to promote recruitment of T-cells to the tumor, and a receptor on T-cells to potentiate anti-tumor activity. REGN7075 is a human immunoglobulin G4-based costimulatory bsAb designed to bridge epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive tumor cells with CD28 positive T-cells and to provide amplified T-cell receptor-CD3 complex-mediated T-cell activation within the tumor, through the activation of CD28 co-stimulation. In genetically humanized immunocompetent mouse models, REGN7075 in combination with anti–PD-1 (antibody directed against programmed cell death-1 receptor) improved anti-tumor activity compared with either single agent alone.1MethodsThis is an open label, Phase I/II, first-in-human study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of REGN7075 (EGFRxCD28) alone and in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT04626635). Patients must have a protocol-defined advanced solid tumor, be ≥18 years of age (≥20 years in Japan), have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and be naïve to anti–PD-1/anti–PD-ligand(L)1.This study includes dose escalation (a 4+3 design modified from 3+3; Part 1) and expansion phases (Part 2). In Part 1, patients will receive a lead-in of REGN7075 monotherapy for 3 weeks followed by combination therapy with cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks. Study therapies are administered until disease progression, intolerable adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or other stopping criterion is met. Once a recommended Phase 2 dose is determined in Part 1, four tumor-specific expansion cohorts will be opened: non-small cell lung cancer (PD-L1 ≥50%), triple-negative breast cancer, colorectal cancer (microsatellite stable), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability of REGN7075 alone or in combination with cemiplimab for Part 1, and objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 for Part 2. This study is currently open to enrollment.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04626635.ReferencesWaite JC, Wang B, Haber L, et al. Tumor-targeted CD28 bispecific antibodies enhance the antitumor efficacy of PD-1 immunotherapy. Sci Transl Med 2020;12:2325.Ethics ApprovalThis study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The study protocol and all amendments were approved by the institutional review board/ethics committee at each participating study site.ConsentAll patients provided written informed consent.
Collapse
|
6
|
Haydon A, Alamgeer M, Brungs D, Collichio F, Khushalani N, Colevas D, Rischin D, Kudchadkar R, Chai-Ho W, Daniels G, Lutzky J, Lee J, Bowyer S, Migden M, Silk A, Lebbe C, Grob JJ, Melero I, Sheladia P, Bommareddy P, He S, Andreu-Vieyra C, Fury M, Hill A. 547 CERPASS: A randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 2 study of cemiplimab ± RP1 in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe prognosis for advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) remains poor for many patients with the disease despite approval of the anti-PD1 antibodies cemiplimab and pembrolizumab.1 2 RP1 is an oncolytic virus (HSV-1) that expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP R-) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). In preclinical studies, RP1 induced immunogenic tumor cell death and provided potent systemic anti-tumor activity, which is further improved by combining anti-PD-1 therapy.3 Preliminary results from IGNYTE, a phase I/II clinical study of RP1 in combination with nivolumab showed a high rate of deep and durable responses in patients (pts) with CSCC.4 The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cemiplimab + RP1 versus cemiplimab alone in advanced CSCC.MethodsThis global, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study is enrolling pts with metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced CSCC who are not candidates for/refuse surgery and/or radiotherapy. Key eligibility criteria include no prior treatment with anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies or oncolytic viruses. The clinical trial will enroll approximately 180 pts from centers in the EU, Australia, Canada and USA. Pts will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio favoring the RP1 + cemiplimab arm. Pts will receive 350 mg of cemiplimab intravenously (IV) Q3W for up to 108 weeks. In the RP1 + cemiplimab arm, RP1 will be injected intratumorally at a starting RP1 dose of 1 × 10^6 plaque forming units (PFU)/mL alone, followed by up to 7 doses of RP1 at 1 × 10^7 PFU/mL Q3W together with cemiplimab. Pts in the combination arm may receive up to 8 additional RP1 doses. No crossover will be allowed. Pts will be stratified by disease status and prior systemic therapy. Tumor assessments will be performed every 9 weeks. Primary endpoints are overall response rate and complete response rate by blinded independent review. Secondary endpoints include safety, progression free survival, duration of response and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include viral shedding and biodistribution, and immune biomarker analyses. This trial is currently enrolling pts.Trial RegistrationNCT04050436ReferencesMigden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, Guminski A, Hauschild A, Lewis KD, Chung CH, Hernandez-Aya L, Lim AM, Chang ALS, Rabinowits G, Thai AA, Dunn LA, Hughes BGM, Khushalani NI, Modi B, Schadendorf D, Gao B, Seebach F, Li S, Li J, Mathias M, Booth J, Mohan K, Stankevich E, Babiker HM, Brana I, Gil-Martin M, Homsi J, Johnson ML, Moreno V, Niu J, Owonikoko TK, Papadopoulos KP, Yancopoulos GD, Lowy I, Fury MG. PD-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;379(4):341–351.Grob JJ, Gonzalez R, Basset-Seguin N, Vornicova O, Schachter J, Joshi A, Meyer N, Grange F, Piulats JM, Bauman JR, Zhang P, Gumuscu B, Swaby RF, Hughes BGM. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase II trial (KEYNOTE-629). J Clin Oncol 2020;38(25):2916–2925.Thomas S, Kuncheria L, Roulstone V, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Bommareddy PK, Smith H, Kaufman HL, Harrington KJ, Coffin RS. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):214.Middleton M, Aroldi F, Sacco J, Milhem M, Curti B, VanderWalde A, Baum S, Samson A, Pavlick A, Chesney J, Niu J, Rhodes T, Bowles T, Conry R, Olsson-Brown A, Earl Laux D, Kaufman H, Bommareddy P, Deterding A, Samakoglu S, Coffin R, Harrington K. 422 An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 clinical trial of RP1, an enhanced potency oncolytic HSV, combined with nivolumab: updated results from the skin cancer cohorts. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8 (3).Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by institutional review board or the local ethics committee at each site. Informed consent was obtained from patients before participating into the trial.
Collapse
|
7
|
Babiker H, Brana I, Mahadevan D, Owonikoko T, Calvo E, Rischin D, Moreno V, Papadopoulos KP, Crittenden M, Formenti S, Giralt J, Garrido P, Soria A, Hervás-Morón A, Mohan KK, Fury M, Lowy I, Mathias M, Feng M, Li J, Stankevich E. Phase I Trial of Cemiplimab, Radiotherapy, Cyclophosphamide, and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1508-e1513. [PMID: 33942954 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
LESSONS LEARNED Cemiplimab in combination with radiation therapy, cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor did not demonstrate efficacy above what can be achieved with other PD-1 inhibitor monotherapies in patients with refractory and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The safety profile of cemiplimab combination therapy was consistent with previously reported safety profiles of cemiplimab monotherapy. No new safety signal was observed. BACKGROUND Refractory and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) generally does not respond to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. Cemiplimab is a human anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. An expansion cohort enrolled patients with R/M HNSCC in a phase I study combining cemiplimab plus radiation therapy (RT), cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). METHODS Patients with R/M HNSCC refractory to at least first-line therapy and for whom palliative RT is clinically indicated received cemiplimab plus RT, cyclophosphamide, and GM-CSF. The co-primary objectives were the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cemiplimab plus RT, cyclophosphamide, and GM-CSF in 15 patients with R/M HNSCC. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled. Patients discontinued treatment due to progression of disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were fatigue (40.0%), constipation (26.7%), and asthenia, dyspnea, maculo-papular rash, and pneumonia (each 20%). The only grade ≥3 TEAE that occurred in two patients was pneumonia (13.3%). By investigator assessment, there was one partial response (6.7%); disease control rate was 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3-67.7; five patients with stable disease); seven patients had progressive disease, and two were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival by investigator assessment was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.7). CONCLUSION The regimen demonstrated tolerability but not efficacy above that which can be achieved with anti-PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for R/M HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hani Babiker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Irene Brana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daruka Mahadevan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Taofeek Owonikoko
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Emiliano Calvo
- START Madrid, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Danny Rischin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Victor Moreno
- START Madrid, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marka Crittenden
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center and The Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Silvia Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Jordi Giralt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar Garrido
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ainara Soria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Asunción Hervás-Morón
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matthew Fury
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Israel Lowy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | | | - Minjie Feng
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jingjin Li
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kundra R, Zhang H, Sheridan R, Sirintrapun SJ, Wang A, Ochoa A, Wilson M, Gross B, Sun Y, Madupuri R, Satravada BA, Reales D, Vakiani E, Al-Ahmadie HA, Dogan A, Arcila M, Zehir A, Maron S, Berger MF, Viaplana C, Janeway K, Ducar M, Sholl L, Dogan S, Bedard P, Surrey LF, Sanchez IH, Syed A, Rema AB, Chakravarty D, Suehnholz S, Nissan M, Iyer GV, Murali R, Bouvier N, Soslow RA, Hyman D, Younes A, Intlekofer A, Harding JJ, Carvajal RD, Sabbatini PJ, Abou-Alfa GK, Morris L, Janjigian YY, Gallagher MM, Soumerai TA, Mellinghoff IK, Hakimi AA, Fury M, Huse JT, Bagrodia A, Hameed M, Thomas S, Gardos S, Cerami E, Mazor T, Kumari P, Raman P, Shivdasani P, MacFarland S, Newman S, Waanders A, Gao J, Solit D, Schultz N. OncoTree: A Cancer Classification System for Precision Oncology. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:221-230. [PMID: 33625877 PMCID: PMC8240791 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer classification is foundational for patient care and oncology research. Systems such as International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT), and National Cancer Institute Thesaurus (NCIt) provide large sets of cancer classification terminologies but they lack a dynamic modernized cancer classification platform that addresses the fast-evolving needs in clinical reporting of genomic sequencing results and associated oncology research. METHODS To meet these needs, we have developed OncoTree, an open-source cancer classification system. It is maintained by a cross-institutional committee of oncologists, pathologists, scientists, and engineers, accessible via an open-source Web user interface and an application programming interface. RESULTS OncoTree currently includes 868 tumor types across 32 organ sites. OncoTree has been adopted as the tumor classification system for American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE), a large genomic and clinical data-sharing consortium, and for clinical molecular testing efforts at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. It is also used by precision oncology tools such as OncoKB and cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. CONCLUSION OncoTree is a dynamic and flexible community-driven cancer classification platform encompassing rare and common cancers that provides clinically relevant and appropriately granular cancer classification for clinical decision support systems and oncology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritika Kundra
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hongxin Zhang
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert Sheridan
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Avery Wang
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Angelica Ochoa
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manda Wilson
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin Gross
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yichao Sun
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ramyasree Madupuri
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Baby A. Satravada
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dalicia Reales
- Clinical Research Administration, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ahmet Dogan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maria Arcila
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Cristina Viaplana
- Oncology Data Science (ODysSey Group), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katherine Janeway
- Pediatrics, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lynette Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Snjezana Dogan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Philippe Bedard
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lea F. Surrey
- Cancer Genomics Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Aijaz Syed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Debyani Chakravarty
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah Suehnholz
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Moriah Nissan
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gopakumar V. Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy Bouvier
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert A. Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Andrew Intlekofer
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - James J. Harding
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Paul J. Sabbatini
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Luc Morris
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
- Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Tara A. Soumerai
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ingo K. Mellinghoff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Abraham A. Hakimi
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Jason T. Huse
- Departments of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stacy Thomas
- Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stuart Gardos
- Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ethan Cerami
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Tali Mazor
- Knowledge Systems Group, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Priti Kumari
- Knowledge Systems Group, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Suzanne MacFarland
- Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Scott Newman
- Department of Computational Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Jianjiong Gao
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David Solit
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reardon D, Nagpal S, Soltys S, Brem S, Omuro A, Fuente MDL, Bredlau AL, Lowy I, Fury M, Morrow M, Kraynyak K, McMullan T, Santo AL, Sacchetta B, Skolnik J. Abstract CT114: INO-5401 and INO-9012 delivered by electroporation (EP) in combination with cemiplimab (REGN2810) in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) (NCT03491683). Clin Trials 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-ct114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
10
|
Novoplansky O, Fury M, Prasad M, Yegodayev K, Zorea J, Cohen L, Pelossof R, Cohen L, Katabi N, Cecchi F, Joshua BZ, Popovtzer A, Baselga J, Scaltriti M, Elkabets M. MET activation confers resistance to cetuximab, and prevents HER2 and HER3 upregulation in head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:748-762. [PMID: 30694565 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
An understanding of the mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to cetuximab is urgently needed to improve cetuximab efficacy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we present a clinical observation that MET pathway activation constitutes the mechanism of acquired resistance to cetuximab in a patient with HNSCC. Specifically, RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry analysis of cetuximab-sensitive (CetuxSen ) and cetuximab-resistant (CetuxRes ) tumors indicated MET amplification and overexpression in the CetuxRes tumor compared to the CetuxSen lesion. Stimulation of MET in HNSCC cell lines was sufficient to reactivate the MAPK pathway and to confer resistance to cetuximab in vitro and in vivo. In addition to the direct role of MET in reactivation of the MAPK pathway, MET stimulation abrogates the well-known cetuximab-induced compensatory feedback loop of HER2/HER3 expression. Mechanistically, we showed that the overexpression of HER2 and HER3 following cetuximab treatment is mediated by the ETS homologous transcription factor (EHF), and is suppressed by MET/MAPK pathway activation. Collectively, our findings indicate that evaluation of MET and HER2/HER3 in response to cetuximab in HNSCC patients can provide the rationale of successive line of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofra Novoplansky
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Matthew Fury
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Manu Prasad
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Ksenia Yegodayev
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Jonathan Zorea
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Limor Cohen
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Raphael Pelossof
- Computational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Liz Cohen
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Nora Katabi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Ben-Zion Joshua
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Aron Popovtzer
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,The Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Clinic, Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Jose Baselga
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maurizio Scaltriti
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Moshe Elkabets
- The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tewari K, Vergote I, Oaknin A, Alvarez E, Gaillard S, Lheureux S, Rischin D, Santin A, Feng M, Mathias M, Fury M, Lowy I, Monk B. GOG 3016/ENGOT-cx9: An open-label, multi-national, randomized, phase III trial of cemiplimab, an anti-PD-1, versus investigator's choice (IC) chemotherapy in ≥ second-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy436.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Moreno V, Gil-Martin M, Johnson M, Aljumaily R, Lopez-Criado M, Northfelt D, Crittenden M, Jabbour S, Rosen L, Calvo E, Papadopoulos K, Garrido P, Hervás Morón A, Rietschel P, Mohan K, Li J, Stankevich E, Feng M, Lowy I, Fury M. MA04.01 Cemiplimab, a Human Monoclonal Anti-PD-1, Alone or in Combination with Radiotherapy: Phase 1 NSCLC Expansion Cohorts. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Papadopoulos KP, Romero RS, Gonzalez G, Dix JE, Lowy I, Fury M. Anti-Hu-Associated Autoimmune Limbic Encephalitis in a Patient with PD-1 Inhibitor-Responsive Myxoid Chondrosarcoma. Oncologist 2017; 23:118-120. [PMID: 29158368 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune encephalitis is an uncommon complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This article reports a case of fatal anti-Hu-associated autoimmune limbic encephalitis presenting within 8 weeks following anti-PD1 therapy in a patient with myxoid chondrosarcoma and pre-existing anti-Hu antibodies. Although tumor reduction occurred in response to PD-1 inhibitor therapy, the patient had a rapidly progressive decline in neurologic function despite initial stabilization with immunosuppression. Considering the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of various malignancies, an increase in the occurrence of neurologic adverse events is likely, requiring prompt intervention and enhanced pharmacovigilance in malignancies associated with onconeuronal antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gabriela Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UT Health, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - James E Dix
- South Texas Radiology Group, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Israel Lowy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New Jersey, USA
| | - Matthew Fury
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Iyengar N, Ghossein R, Kochhar A, Morris L, Zhou X, Morris P, Awad M, Fury M, Pfister D, Patel S, Boyle J, Hudis C, Dannenberg A. 2874 Impact of white adipose tissue inflammation on survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31611-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
15
|
Charen AS, Hyman D, Katabi N, Voss M, Gounder M, Monson K, Stasi M, Winkelman J, Gerecitano J, Carvajal R, Fury M. Parallel Phase I Studies of Two Schedules of Bkm120 Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu331.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Fury M, Ou S, Balmanoukian A, Hansen A, Massarelli E, Blake-Haskins A, Li X, Robbins P, Vasselli J, Segal N. Clinical Activity and Safety of Medi4736, an Anti-Pd-L1 Antibody, in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu340.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
17
|
Riaz N, Hong JC, Sherman EJ, Morris L, Fury M, Ganly I, Wang TJC, Shi W, Wolden SL, Jackson A, Wong RJ, Zhang Z, Rao SD, Lee NY. A nomogram to predict loco-regional control after re-irradiation for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111:382-7. [PMID: 24993329 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Revised: 05/26/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Loco-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) in the setting of prior radiotherapy carries significant morbidity and mortality. The role of re-irradiation (re-RT) remains unclear due to toxicity. We determined prognostic factors for loco-regional control (LRC) and formulated a nomogram to help clinicians select re-RT candidates. MATERIAL AND METHODS From July 1996 to April 2011, 257 patients with recurrent HNC underwent fractionated re-RT. Median prior dose was 65 Gy and median time between RT was 32.4 months. One hundred fifteen patients (44%) had salvage surgery and 172 (67%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Median re-RT dose was 59.4 Gy and 201 (78%) patients received IMRT. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used to identify independent predictors of LRC and a nomogram for 2-year LRC was constructed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 32.6 months. Two-year LRC and overall survival (OS) were 47% and 43%, respectively. Recurrent stage (P=0.005), non-oral cavity subsite (P<0.001), absent organ dysfunction (P<0.001), salvage surgery (P<0.001), and dose >50 Gy (P=0.006) were independently associated with improved LRC. We generated a nomogram with concordance index of 0.68. CONCLUSION Re-RT can be curative, and our nomogram can help determine a priori which patients may benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Julian C Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Luc Morris
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Matthew Fury
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Weji Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, United States
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, United States
| | - Shyam D Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Riaz N, Sherman EJ, Fury M, Lee N. Should cetuximab replace Cisplatin for definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer? J Clin Oncol 2012; 31:287-8. [PMID: 23213096 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.46.9049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
19
|
Lim R, Eaton A, Lee NY, Setton J, Ohri N, Rao S, Wong R, Fury M, Schöder H. 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2012; 53:1506-13. [PMID: 22895812 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with chemoradiotherapy can now accomplish excellent locoregional disease control, but patient overall survival (OS) remains limited by development of distant metastases (DM). We investigated the prognostic value of staging (18)F-FDG PET/CT, beyond clinical risk factors, for predicting DM and OS in 176 patients after definitive chemoradiotherapy. METHODS The PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were recorded. Univariate Cox regression was used to examine the prognostic value of these variables and clinical prognosticators for local treatment failure (LTF), OS, and DM. Multivariate analysis examined the effect of SUVmax, TLG, and MTV in the presence of other covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate prognostic values of PET/CT parameters. RESULTS Primary tumors were distributed across all stages. Most patients underwent chemoradiotherapy only, and 11 also underwent tonsillectomy. On univariate analysis, primary tumor MTV was predictive of LTF (P = 0.005, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4 for a doubling of MTV), DM and OS (P < 0.001 for both, HR = 1.9 and 1.8, respectively). The primary tumor TLG was associated with DM and OS (P < 0.001, HR = 1.6 and 1.7, respectively, for a doubling of TLG). The primary tumor SUVmax was associated with death (P = 0.029, HR = 1.1 for a 1-unit increase in standardized uptake value) but had no relationship with LTF or DM. In multivariate analysis, TLG and MTV remained associated with death after correcting for T stage (P = 0.0125 and 0.0324, respectively) whereas no relationship was seen between standardized uptake value and death after adjusting for T stage (P = 0.158). CONCLUSION Parameters capturing the volume of (18)F-FDG-positive disease (MTV or TLG) provide important prognostic information in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy and should be considered for risk stratification in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remy Lim
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Lee N, Bartlett R, Lian M, Fury M, Sherman E, Wong R, Zanzonico P, Schöder H, Humm J. A Pilot Study Of Using Pre- And Early (1 Week) [18f]-misonidazole Positron Emission And Computed Tomography (18F-FMISO PET/CT) Scans As An Early Treatment Response Predictor In A Series Of Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Patients Undergoing Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
22
|
Koutcher L, Fury M, Sherman E, Wolden S, Zhang Z, Mo Q, Zelefsky M, Kraus D, Pfister D, Lee N. Outcomes and Late Effects: A Comparison of Patients with Locally-advanced Head and Neck Cancer (LAHNC) Treated with Cisplatin (CDDP) and Radiation (RT) vs. Cetuximab (C) and RT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
23
|
Koutcher L, Fury M, Wolden S, Zhang Z, Mo Q, Zelefsky M, Kraus D, Sherman E, Pfister D, Lee N. Comparison of cisplatin (CDDP) and radiation (RT) to cetuximab (C) and RT for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC): A preliminary analysis. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.6042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6042 Background: Both concurrent CDDP/RT and C/RT have been shown in randomized trials to yield superior disease control compared to RT alone in LAHNC, but no randomized trial has compared them. We evaluated our center's experience with these regimens. Methods: From 3/1/06 - 4/1/08, 175 patients were retrospectively identified who received definitive treatment for LAHNC with CDDP (planned total dose 100 mg/m2 Q3 weeks X 3) and RT (n = 125) or C (400 mg/m2 load; 250 mg/m2 weekly) and RT (n = 50). Patients who received prior RT, additional systemic therapy, and/or surgery to the primary site were excluded. C was given for the following reasons: auditory 30%, renal 4%, cardiac 2%, performance status 18%, patient choice 16%, neuropathy 4%, unknown 2%, and a combination of factors 24%. The median age: CDDP group 56, 6% >71; C group 66.5, 40% >71. Additional CDDP and C features: male sex, 86 v 78%; stage IV, 70 v 68%; and oropharynx, 78 v 70%. Median RT dose (70 Gy), RT length (46 days), and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (90%) were the same; alcohol/tobacco use was similar. Results: At a median follow up of 18.7 months, with death without local failure (LF) as a competing risk, the 18 month LF incidence rate was 2.5% in the CDDP group and 43.3% in the C group (p < 0.0001), with the latest event occurring at 16.5 months. The 18 month disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 85.7 v 40.9%, and 96.8 v 73.1%, in favor of CDDP (p < 0.0001 for both). Initially, 21 variables were assessed for significance, and when Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis to address prognostic imbalances, treatment with CDDP still predicted for improved LF, DFS, and OS (p < 0.0001 for LF and DFS; p = 0.0017 for OS). For OS analysis, the concordance probability estimates were .67 for using drug choice alone and .80 for using drug choice, T stage, RT dose, and KPS. Conclusions: CDDP/RT and C/RT were used to treat somewhat different populations with LAHNC. The observed superiority of CDDP/RT compared to C/RT in LF, DFS, and OS may reflect patient selection issues. However, preliminary multivariate modeling suggests that CDDP/RT remains the preferred option for fit patients pending further analyses and prospective studies comparing these regimens. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Koutcher
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M. Fury
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S. Wolden
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Z. Zhang
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Q. Mo
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M. Zelefsky
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D. Kraus
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - E. Sherman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D. Pfister
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N. Lee
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee N, Jensen J, Schoder H, Wang Y, Fury M, Pfister DG, Stambuk H, Humm J, Koutcher J, Shukla-Dave A. Correlation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) with 18f-fluoromisonidazole positron emission and computed tomography ( 18F-FMISO PET/CT) in assessing tumor hypoxia in a series of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with nodal metastases. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.6083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6083 Background: 18F-FMISO PET/CT is a noninvasive hypoxia imaging modality. Hypoxia can develop within the tumor which typically corresponds to regions with poor blood perfusion. DCE-MRI can yield results on tumor perfusion. The present study compares hypoxic and perfusion status of HNC with nodal metastases using DCE-MRI and 18F-FMISO PET/CT imaging. Methods: 13 HNC (7 base of tongue, 5 tonsil, 1 larynx) patients with nodal metastases underwent both DCE-MRI and 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans prior to chemoradiotherapy. MRI was performed on a 1.5 Tesla GE Excite scanner. DCE-MRI studies were acquired using a fast multi-phase spoiled gradient echo sequence. Antecubital vein catheters delivered a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA at 2 cc/s. For 18F-FMISO PET/CT,∼10.0 mCi of 18F-FMISO was administered IV and images were acquired ∼2 hours later. PET images were reconstructed; CT data were used for attenuation correction. Region of interests (ROIs) were manually drawn by a neuroradiologist. Quantitative DCE-MRI analyses were done using the 2-compartment Tofts model. The analyses calculated the pixel Ktrans(distribution rate constant), ve(extravascular-extra-cellular volume fraction), and kep(redistribution rate constant). 18F-FMISO PET/CT images were analyzed and the uptake by the tumor was scored as: no uptake (score 0); moderate-severe uptake (score 1). Semi-quantitative analysis included standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements. Statistical significance was calculated using a 2-sided Student's t-test, with p < 0.05. Results: A total of 17 nodes were analyzed. For the nodes that showed no hypoxia on PET imaging (n = 7), the mean (±SD) values were: 18F-MISO SUV (1.1 ± 03), Ktrans(0.33 ± 0.18), ve(0.53 ± 0.23), and kep(0.66 ± 0.25). For the nodes that showed moderate to severe 18F-MISO uptake (n = 10) the values were: 18F-FMISO SUV (2.8 ± 08), Ktrans(0.24 ± 0.07), ve(0.61 ± 0.13), and kep (0.43 ± 0.17). A significant lower kep for nodes with 18F-MISO uptake (p = 0.042). Conclusions: Preliminary result supports the hypothesis that the hypoxic nodes are poorly perfused nodes (lower kep values) versus nodes with no hypoxia. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Lee
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Jensen
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - H. Schoder
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Y. Wang
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M. Fury
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D. G. Pfister
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - H. Stambuk
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Humm
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Koutcher
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
In the Western world, more than 90% of head and neck cancers are head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). The most appropriate treatment approach for HNSCC varies with the disease stage and disease site in the head and neck. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has become a widely used means for the definitive treatment of locoregionally advanced HNSCC. Although this multimodality treatment provides higher response rates than radiotherapy alone, the detection of residual viable tumor after the end of therapy remains an important issue and is one of the major applications of (18)F-FDG PET. Studies have shown that negative (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT results after concurrent chemoradiotherapy have a high negative predictive value (>95%), whereas the positive predictive value is only about 50%. However, when applied properly, FDG PET/CT can exclude residual disease in most patients, particularly patients with residual enlarged lymph nodes who would otherwise undergo neck dissection. In contrast to other malignancies, data are limited on the utility of (18)F-FDG PET for monitoring the response to induction chemotherapy in HNSCC or for assessing treatment response early during the course of definitive chemoradiotherapy. The proliferation marker (18)F-3'-deoxy-3'fluorothymidine is currently under study for this purpose. Beyond standard chemotherapy, newer treatment regimens in HNSCC take advantage of our improved understanding of tumor biology. Two molecules important in the progression of HNSCC are the epidermal growth factor receptor and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGF-R. Drugs attacking these molecules are now under study for HNSCC. PET probes have been developed for imaging the presence of these molecules in HNSCC and their inhibition by specific drug interaction; the relevance of these probes for response assessment in HNSCC will be discussed. Hypoxia is a common phenomenon in HNSCC and renders cancers resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy. Imaging and quantification of hypoxia with PET probes is under study and may become a prerequisite for overcoming chemo- and radioresistance using radiosensitizing drugs or hypoxia-directed irradiation techniques and for monitoring the response to these techniques in selected groups of patients. Although (18)F-FDG PET/CT will remain the major clinical tool for monitoring treatment in HNSCC, other PET probes may have a role in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from treatment strategies that include biologic agents such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors or VEGF inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee N, Nehmeh S, Schöder H, Fury M, Chan K, Ling CC, Humm J. Prospective trial incorporating pre-/mid-treatment [18F]-misonidazole positron emission tomography for head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:101-8. [PMID: 19203843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2008] [Revised: 10/10/2008] [Accepted: 10/24/2008] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the results from a prospective study of a series of locoregionally advanced head-and-neck cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy and to discuss the findings of their pre-/mid-treatment [(18)F]-misonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 28 patients agreed to participate in this study. Of these 28 patients, 20 (90% with an oropharyngeal primary cancer) were able to undergo the requirements of the protocol. Each patient underwent four PET scans: one pretreatment fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography scan, two pretreatment (18)F-FMISO PET/computed tomography scans, and a third (18)F-FMISO PET (mid-treatment) scan performed 4 weeks after the start of chemoradiotherapy. The (18)F-FMISO PET scans were acquired 2-3 h after tracer administration. Patients were treated with 2-3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy concurrent with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy. RESULTS A heterogeneous distribution of (18)F-FMISO was noted in the primary and/or nodal disease in 90% of the patients. Two patients had persistent detectable hypoxia on their third mid-treatment (18)F-FMISO PET scan. One patient experienced regional/distant failure but had no detectable residual hypoxia on the mid-treatment (18)F-FMISO PET scan. CONCLUSION Excellent locoregional control was observed in this series of head-and-neck cancer patients treated with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy despite evidence of detectable hypoxia on the pretreatment (18)F-FMISO PET/computed tomography scans of 18 of 20 patients. In this prospective study, neither the presence nor the absence of hypoxia, as defined by positive (18)F-FMISO findings on the mid-treatment PET scan, correlated with patient outcome. The results of this study have confirmed similar results reported previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hensley ML, Larkin J, Fury M, Gerst S, Tai DF, Sabbatini P, Konner J, Orlando M, Goss TL, Aghajanian CA. A Phase I Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Gemcitabine Given Biweekly with B-Vitamin Support in Solid Tumor Malignancies or Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14:6310-6. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
28
|
Ong SC, Schöder H, Lee NY, Patel SG, Carlson D, Fury M, Pfister DG, Shah JP, Larson SM, Kraus DH. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2008; 49:532-40. [PMID: 18344440 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED For patients with locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a widely accepted treatment, but the need for subsequent neck dissection remains controversial. We investigated the clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this setting. METHODS In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)-compliant retrospective study, we reviewed the records of patients with HNSCC who were treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy between March 2002 and December 2004. Patients with lymph node metastases who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT > or = 8 wk after the end of therapy were included. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were validated by biopsy, histopathology of neck dissection specimens (n = 18), or clinical and imaging follow-up (median, 37 mo). RESULTS Sixty-five patients with a total of 84 heminecks could be evaluated. 18F-FDG PET/CT (visual analysis) detected residual nodal disease with a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and an accuracy of 88%. Twenty-nine heminecks contained residual enlarged lymph nodes (diameter, > or =1.0 cm), but viable tumor was found in only 5 of them. 18F-FDG PET/CT was true-positive in 4 and false-positive in 6 heminecks, but the NPV was high at 94%. Fifty-five heminecks contained no residual enlarged nodes, and PET/CT was true-negative in 50 of these, yielding a specificity of 96% and an NPV of 98%. Lack of residual lymphadenopathy on CT had an NPV of 96%. Finally, normal 18F-FDG PET/CT excluded residual disease at the primary site with a specificity of 95%, an NPV of 97%, and an accuracy of 92%. CONCLUSION In patients with HNSCC, normal 18F-FDG PET/CT after chemoradiotherapy has a high NPV and specificity for excluding residual locoregional disease. In patients without residual lymphadenopathy, neck dissection may be withheld safely. In patients with residual lymphadenopathy, a lack of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in these nodes also excludes viable tumor with high certainty, but confirmation of these data in a prospective study may be necessary before negative 18F-FDG PET/CT may become the only, or at least most-decisive, criterion in the management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seng Chuan Ong
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rizvi NA, Rusch V, Zhao B, Senturk E, Schwartz L, Fury M, Downey R, Rizk N, Krug L, Kris MG. Single agent bevacizumab and bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin as induction therapy for resectable IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.18045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
18045 Background: Bevacizumab (Bev) improves response and survival in patients with advanced non-squamous lung cancer with chemotherapy however there are limited data as single agent therapy and in early stage NSCLC. Methods: Patients with resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were eligible. Patients with adenocarcinoma (Cohort 1) received preoperative Bev and docetaxel and cisplatin (DC). Patients with squamous histology, central location or recent hemoptysis received DC induction therapy without Bev (Cohort 2). Cohort 1 received Bev (15 mg/kg) followed by CT 2 weeks later to assess single agent Bev response. Subsequently D (75 mg/m2) and C (75 mg/m2) were given q 3 weeks; an additional 2 cycles of Bev was administered with C2 and C3 of DC (total of 3 preoperative doses of Bev). Cohort 2 received DC alone followed by resection. Both cohorts received adjuvant Bev x 1 year. Study endpoints included response to single agent Bev, downstaging, safety and survival. Results: 19 patients of planned 70 were enrolled (11 Cohort 1 and 8 Cohort 2). On Cohort 1, there were 2 clinical stage IIB and 9 IIIA patients. After single agent Bev (by bimensional measurement), > 10% reduction in tumor size was observed after 2 weeks in 6/11 patients (- 20%, 15%, 16%, 15%, 13% and 20%). After Bev + DC, there were 6/10 (60%) PRs and DC delivery was 96%. 6/10 patient underwent R0 resection; 1 R2 and 2 were unresectable. 1 patient developed hemoptysis preoperatively and 1 patient developed an upper GI bleed post-operatively. There were otherwise no Bev related operative complications observed. 5/9 patients were downstaged by induction treatment. 3 patients received adjuvant bevacizumab to date (median 5.7 cycles). 8 patients were treated on Cohort 2 (3 with stage IB, 1 with IIB and 4 with IIIA). All 8 patients underwent R0 resection. DC delivery was 94% and there were 6/8 PRs. Downstaging was observed in 5/8 patients and 6/8 are receiving adjuvant Bev (median # cycles to date = 6.7). Conclusions: Bev as a single agent demonstrates regression of tumors after 2 weeks. To date, Bev has been safely administered in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Preoperative chemotherapy is well tolerated with more than 90% full dose drug delivery. The study is ongoing. Supported by Genentech, Inc. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. A. Rizvi
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - V. Rusch
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - B. Zhao
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - E. Senturk
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - L. Schwartz
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - M. Fury
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - R. Downey
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - N. Rizk
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - L. Krug
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| | - M. G. Kris
- Memor Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dave A, Fury M, Lee N, Stambuk H, Wang Y, Karimi S, Pfister D, Koutcher J. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as a predictor of response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.6007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6007 Background: We wish to assess on a preliminary basis whether pretreatment DCE-MRI predicts response to chemoradiation in HNSCC. Methods: Tumor perfusion was assessed in 14 patients (median age, 56y; 13 M, 1 F; squamous cell cancer 13, poorly differentiated carcinoma 1; base of tongue 6; tonsil 6; larynx 1; nasopharynx 1) with nodal metastases (size >1 cc for DCE-MRI; N1, 3; N2a, 2; N2b, 4; N2c, 4; N3, 1; Stage III, 3; Stage IVa, 10; Stage IVb, 1) prior to platin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Data were acquired on a 1.5 Tesla clinical scanner with a standard MRI protocol using a clinical contrast agent (Gd-DTPA). The two compartment model analysis measured the rate constants of the contrast agent transfer between the lesion and plasma compartments (kep) and elimination by the plasma (kel). Each patient was assigned a single MR imaging parameter of uptake slope and compartmental model (Akep) on the basis of the histogram analysis of all individually fit tumor voxels. Histogram analysis calculated the amplitude (a), width (s), and median (μ) of the distribution from the fitting procedure. Overall response was determined approximately 2–5 months post treatment. Results: DCE-MRI data showed a rapid rise in the time intensity curves for viable appearing tumor, whereas muscle showed minimal signal enhancement. The mean Akep value was higher for complete responders (CR/near CR, n = 7) than for incomplete responders (ICR, n = 7; 3 partial response, 4 no response) (12.29/min±4.09 vs 7.11/min±2.51 [P = 0.04]. The preliminary histogram analysis for the slope showed that the width and median were able to differentiate between CR and ICR, P=0.039 and P=0.013 respectively, while amplitude was not significant (P=0.150). Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that DCE-MRI may prove to be a useful predictor of response in HNSCC patients, and thus may enhance prognostication, patient selection, and treatment outcomes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Dave
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M. Fury
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - N. Lee
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - H. Stambuk
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Y. Wang
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S. Karimi
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D. Pfister
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Koutcher
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Su YB, Tuttle RM, Fury M, Ghossein R, Singh B, Herman K, Venkatraman ES, Stambuk H, Robbins R, Pfister DG. A phase II study of single agent depsipeptide (DEP) in patients (pts) with radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory, metastatic, thyroid carcinoma: Preliminary toxicity and efficacy experience. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.5554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5554 Background: RAI-refractory thyroid cancer carries a poor prognosis, and no effective systemic therapy exists. DEP is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with broad in vitro and phase I anti-tumor activity, and has restored sodium-iodide symporter expression and RAI avidity in thyroid cancer cell lines. Methods: Eligible pts have confirmed papillary, follicular, or Hürthle cell carcinoma, progressive measurable disease, and adequate hepatic/renal function. All pts are RAI-refractory by diagnostic RAI whole body scan (WBS). Prior chemotherapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting, and history of significant cardiac disease are exclusions. DEP 13 mg/m2 IV is given on day 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. A novel Simon 2-stage design specifies an initial accrual of 21 pts, with expansion to 41 total pts if 2 RECIST responses or 6 pts with PFS at 6 months are observed. Primary outcome is RECIST response rate. Change in RAI avidity (by diagnostic RAI WBS) is a secondary outcome. Results: To date, 14 pts have been enrolled: female 50%, median age 62 (42–78), median Karnofsky 90 (70–100), papillary/follicular/Hürthle histology (7/1/6). Grade 3–5 toxicities possibly related to drug: grade 5 sudden death (1); no grade 4 toxicity; grade 3 toxicity - fatigue (1), dysphagia (1), dyspnea (1). No grade 3 thrombocytopenia (phase I DLT) has been observed. Grade 1 (6) and grade 2 (4) fatigue have been common. As a result of the grade 5 event, protocol accrual and treatment were suspended temporarily. After NCI-CTEP review, more restrictive cardiac exclusions were added and protocol accrual was resumed. Response at 2 months: stable disease (4); progression (2); inevaluable (6, due to protocol suspension); withdrew consent (1); too early (1). In a proof-of-principle event, clinically significant restoration of RAI avidity was observed in a 78 year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Per protocol, she was taken off study and given treatment-dose RAI; post-therapy WBS confirmed dramatic RAI avidity. Conclusions: Preliminary signs of in vivo reversal of RAI resistance have been observed. Accrual continues with more restrictive cardiac exclusions, and close surveillance for cardiac events. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y. B. Su
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - R. M. Tuttle
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - M. Fury
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - R. Ghossein
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - B. Singh
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - K. Herman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - H. Stambuk
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - R. Robbins
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - D. G. Pfister
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Park SM, Liu G, Kubal A, Fury M, Cao L, Marx SO. Direct interaction between BKCa potassium channel and microtubule-associated protein 1A. FEBS Lett 2004; 570:143-8. [PMID: 15251455 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2004] [Accepted: 06/14/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The BKCa channel, a potassium channel that is allosterically activated by voltage and calcium, is expressed in both excitable and non-excitable cells. The channel plays an important role in regulating membrane excitability. The channel activity can be modulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation. Recently, hippocampal BKCa channels were shown to be directly modulated by assembly/disassembly of the submembranous actin cytoskeleton. Here, we report that the BKCa channel physically interacts with the light chain of microtubule associated protein 1A (MAP1A). The light chain was isolated in a yeast two-hybrid screen of a human brain cDNA library. The specificity of the interaction was demonstrated in biochemical experiments utilizing GST fusion protein pulldown assays and reciprocal co-immunoprecipitations from rat brain. Furthermore, utilizing immunofluorescence, the BKCa channel and MAP1A co-localize in the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum. These studies identify a novel interaction between the C-terminal tail of the BKCa channel and the light chain of MAP1A, which enables channel association with and modulation by the cytoskeleton.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Mi Park
- Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
The activity of ion channels is regulated by several different mechanisms. Studies have been undertaken to determine how the large-conductance Ca(2+)-sensitive K(+) channel (the BK channel) is regulated. Fury et al. discuss how the presence or absence of alternatively spliced regions in the BK channel alpha subunit can act as a molecular switch by which different kinases activate the BK channel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Fury
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, Department of Pharmacology, and Division of Cardiology, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fury M, Marx SO, Marks AR. Molecular BKology: The Study of Splicing and Dicing. Sci Signal 2002. [DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.1232002pe12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
35
|
Fury M, Andersen J, Ponda P, Aimes R, Zieve GW. Thirteen anti-Sm monoclonal antibodies immunoprecipitate the three cytoplasmic snRNP core protein precursors in six distinct subsets. J Autoimmun 1999; 12:91-100. [PMID: 10047429 DOI: 10.1006/jaut.1998.0266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) common core proteins are the lupus-associated Sm autoantigens. In mouse fibroblasts the seven snRNP core proteins form a particle with a suggested stoichiometry of B2[D1,D2(E,F,G)2] D3. Core particle assembly occurs in the cytoplasm where newly synthesized snRNAs assemble with core proteins stored in three RNA-free complexes of (1) a 6S complex of [D1,D2(E,F,G)2] (2) a 20S complex of (B,D3 and an unidentified 70 kDa protein) and (3) a 2S-6S complex that minimally contains the B protein. In this report a panel of 13 anti-Sm monoclonal antibodies is shown to immunoprecipitate six different subsets of the cytoplasmic snRNP proteins. Four epitopes are shared by the three aforementioned complexes and five other epitopes are shared by two of the complexes. In addition, the 6S or 20S complexes are apparently disrupted by five of the antibodies. Kinetic studies show that the three cytoplasmic snRNP protein complexes have independent half-lives. These studies provide another approach for characterizing the Sm epitopes. They also complement previous in vitro snRNP assembly studies and suggest that snRNP core assembly occurs by the initial binding of snRNA to the 6S particle followed by addition of the B and D3 proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Fury
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8691, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Finney RJ, Fury M, Jonas J. Density and temperature dependence of self‐diffusion and shear viscosity of perfluorocyclobutane in the dense fluid region. J Chem Phys 1977. [DOI: 10.1063/1.433953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
38
|
|