1
|
Nixon LS, Hudson N, Culley L, Lakhanpaul M, Robertson N, Johnson MRD, McFeeters M, Johal N, Hamlyn-Williams C, Boo YY, Lakhanpaul M. Key considerations when involving children in health intervention design: reflections on working in partnership with South Asian children in the UK on a tailored Management and Intervention for Asthma (MIA) study. Res Involv Engagem 2022; 8:9. [PMID: 35227322 PMCID: PMC8883750 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00342-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Participatory research is an empowering process through which individuals can increase control over their lives, and allows researchers/clinicians to gain a clearer understanding of a child's needs. However, involving children in participatory research is still relatively novel, despite national and international mandates to engage children in decision making. This paper draws on the learnings from designing the Management and Intervention for Asthma (MIA) study, which used a collaborative participatory method to develop an intervention-planning framework for South Asian children with asthma. There are currently 1 million children in the UK receiving treatment for asthma, making it one of the most prevalent chronic childhood illnesses. Symptoms of asthma are often underrecognized in children from South Asian communities in the UK, contributing to increased disease severity and increased attendance at the emergency department compared to White British children. Despite this, ethnic minorities are often excluded from research and thus absent from the 'evidence base', making it essential to hear their perspectives if health inequalities are to be successfully addressed. We worked alongside healthcare professionals, community facilitators, parents, and children to identify the key concerns and priorities they had and then designed the framework around their needs. Reflecting on the process, we identified several key considerations that need to be addressed when co-developing interventions with children. These include the power dynamics between the parent/researcher and child; navigating the consent/assent process; how parental involvement might affect the research; establishing a convenient time and location; how to keep children engaged throughout the process; tailoring activities to different levels of ability; and accounting for cultural differences. These factors were considered by the researchers when designing the study, however, implementing them was not without its challenges and highlighted the need for researchers to develop expertise in this field. Tailoring existing research methods allowed us to explore children's perceptions, priorities, and experiences of illness more effectively. However, involving children in participatory research is a complex undertaking, and researchers need to ensure that they have the expertise, time, and resources necessary to be able to fully support the needs of child participants before deciding to commit to this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S. Nixon
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Lorraine Culley
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Maya Lakhanpaul
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Noelle Robertson
- Department of Neuroscience Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Melanie McFeeters
- NHS England, Direct Commissioning, Midlands Region, Leicestershire, UK
| | | | | | - Yebeen Ysabelle Boo
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Aceso Global Health Consultants Ltd., London, UK
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Monica Lakhanpaul
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Community Paediatrics, Whittington NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lakhanpaul M, Culley L, Robertson N, Alexander EC, Bird D, Hudson N, Johal N, McFeeters M, Hamlyn-Williams C, Manikam L, Boo YY, Lakhanpaul M, Johnson MRD. A structured collaborative approach to intervention design using a modified intervention mapping approach: a case study using the Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) project for South Asian children. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:271. [PMID: 33138784 PMCID: PMC7607819 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01148-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To describe how using a combined approach of community-based participatory research and intervention mapping principles could inform the development of a tailored complex intervention to improve management of asthma for South Asian (SA) children; Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) study. METHODS A qualitative study using interviews, focus groups, workshops, and modified intervention mapping procedures to develop an intervention planning framework in an urban community setting in Leicester, UK. The modified form of intervention mapping (IM) included: systematic evidence synthesis; community study; families and healthcare professionals study; and development of potential collaborative intervention strategies. Participants in the community study were 63 SA community members and 12 key informants; in-depth semi-structured interviews involved 30 SA families, 14 White British (WB) families and 37 Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) treating SA children living with asthma; prioritisation workshops involved 145 SA, 6 WB and 37 HCP participants; 30 participants in finalisation workshops. RESULTS Two key principles were utilised throughout the development of the intervention; community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles and intervention mapping (IM) procedures. The CBPR approach allowed close engagement with stakeholders and generated valuable knowledge to inform intervention development. It accounted for diverse perceptions and experiences with regard to asthma and recognised the priorities of patients and their families/caregivers for service improvement. The 'ACT on Asthma' programme was devised, comprising four arms of an intervention strategy: education and training, clinical support, advice centre and raising awareness, to be co-ordinated by a central team. CONCLUSIONS The modified IM principles utilised in this study were systematic and informed by theory. The combined IM and participatory approach could be considered when tailoring interventions for other clinical problems within diverse communities. The IM approach to intervention development was however resource intensive. Working in meaningful collaboration with minority communities requires specific resources and a culturally competent methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lakhanpaul
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. .,Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Lorraine Culley
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | - Noelle Robertson
- Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK
| | - Emma C Alexander
- Paediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Centre and Mowatlabs, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK.,Aceso Global Health Consultants Ltd., 3 Abbey Terrace, London, SE2 9EY, UK
| | - Deborah Bird
- Child Development Team, Ealing Services for Children with Additional Needs, West London NHS Trust, Carmelita House, 21-22 The Mall, Ealing, W5 2PJ, UK
| | - Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | | | - Melanie McFeeters
- Specialised Commissioning, NHS England and NHS Improvement, Midlands Region, Fosse House, 6 Smith Way, Grove Park, Enderby, Leicester, LE19 1SX, UK
| | - Charlotte Hamlyn-Williams
- Center for Health Services and Clinical Research, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Logan Manikam
- Aceso Global Health Consultants Ltd., 3 Abbey Terrace, London, SE2 9EY, UK.,UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Healthcare, 1 - 19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Yebeen Ysabelle Boo
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.,Aceso Global Health Consultants Ltd., 3 Abbey Terrace, London, SE2 9EY, UK.,Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Maya Lakhanpaul
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mark R D Johnson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lakhanpaul M, Culley L, Huq T, Bird D, Hudson N, Robertson N, McFeeters M, Manikam L, Johal N, Hamlyn-Williams C, Johnson MRD. Qualitative study to identify ethnicity-specific perceptions of and barriers to asthma management in South Asian and White British children with asthma. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024545. [PMID: 30782908 PMCID: PMC6411253 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper draws on the data from the Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) study to explore the perceptions and experiences of asthma in British South Asian children using semi-structured interviews. A comparable cohort of White British children was recruited to identify whether any emerging themes were subject to variation between the two groups so that generic and ethnicity-specific themes could be identified for future tailored intervention programmes for South Asian children with asthma. SETTING South Asian and White British children with asthma took part in semi-structured interviews in Leicester, UK. PARTICIPANTS Thirty three South Asian and 14 White British children with asthma and aged 5-12 years were interviewed. RESULTS Both similar and contrasting themes emerged from the semi-structured interviews. Interviews revealed considerable similarities in the experience of asthma between the South Asian and White British children, including the lack of understanding of asthma (often confusing trigger with cause), lack of holistic discussions with healthcare professionals (HCPs), an overall neutral or positive experience of interactions with HCPs, the role of the family in children's self-management and the positive role of school and friends. Issues pertinent to South Asian children related to a higher likelihood of feeling embarrassed and attributing physical activity to being a trigger for asthma symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The two ethnicity-specific factors revealed by the interviews are significant in children's self-management of asthma and therefore, indicate the need for a tailored intervention in South Asian children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lakhanpaul
- Population, Policy and Practice, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Lorraine Culley
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Tausif Huq
- School of Medical Education, King’s College London, Guy’s King’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Deborah Bird
- Ealing Community Paediatric Service, Ealing Child Development Team, London, UK
| | - Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Noelle Robertson
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Centre for Medical Humanities, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie McFeeters
- NHS England, Specialised Commissioning East Midlands, Leicestershire, UK
| | - Logan Manikam
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK
| | | | | | - Mark R D Johnson
- Mary Seacole Research Centre, DeMonfort University, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lakhanpaul M, Culley L, Robertson N, Bird D, Hudson N, Johal N, McFeeters M, Angell E, Hamlyn-Williams C, Abbas N, Manikam L, Johnson M. A qualitative study to identify parents' perceptions of and barriers to asthma management in children from South Asian and White British families. BMC Pulm Med 2017; 17:126. [PMID: 28931381 PMCID: PMC5607610 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0464-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over one million children receive treatment for asthma in the UK. South Asian children experience excess morbidity and higher rates of hospitalization than the White population. This study aimed to explore perceptions and experiences of asthma and asthma management in British South Asian and White British families, to identify barriers to optimal management and to inform culturally appropriate interventions to improve management. Methods A qualitative methodology, using semi-structured interviews was adopted. Members of 30 families from six major South Asian ethnic-religious groups were purposively sampled (n = 49). For comparison, 17 White British parents were interviewed. Topics included understandings of asthma; day-to-day management; interactions with health care providers and the perceived quality of healthcare services. Data were analyzed using interpretive thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo. Similarities and differences between South Asian and White families were analysed across key themes. Results Many of the problems facing families of a child with asthma were common to South Asian and White British families. Both had limited understanding of asthma causes and triggers and expressed confusion about the use of medications. Both groups reported delays in receiving a clear diagnosis and many experienced what was perceived as uncoordinated care and inconsistent advice from health professionals. No family had received an asthma plan. South Asian families had more difficulty in recognising severity of symptoms and those with limited English faced additional barriers to receiving adequate information and advice about management due to poor communication support systems. South Asian parents reported higher levels of involvement of wider family and higher levels of stigma. Attendance at the emergency department was related to previous experience, difficulties in accessing primary care, lack of knowledge of alternatives and difficulties in assessing severity. Conclusions Barriers to optimal asthma management exist at the individual family, community and healthcare systems levels. Culturally sensitive, holistic and collaboratively designed interventions are needed. Improved communication support for families with lower proficiency in English is required. Healthcare professionals need to ensure that families receive an asthma plan and make greater efforts to check families’ understandings of asthma triggers, use of medications, assessment of asthma severity and accessing help.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lakhanpaul
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
| | - Lorraine Culley
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | - Noelle Robertson
- Clinical Psychology, University of Leicester, Centre for Medicine, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK
| | - Deborah Bird
- Department of Community Paediatrics, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Wycombe Hospital, Queen Alexandra Road, High Wycombe, HP11 2TT, UK
| | - Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | | | - Melanie McFeeters
- Specialised Commissioning East Midlands, NHS England, Fosse House, 6 Smith Way, Grove Park, Leicestershire, Enderby, LE19 1SX, UK
| | - Emma Angell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Charlotte Hamlyn-Williams
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Nadine Abbas
- School of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
| | - Logan Manikam
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hudson N, Culley L, Johnson M, McFeeters M, Robertson N, Angell E, Lakhanpaul M. Asthma management in British South Asian children: an application of the candidacy framework to a qualitative understanding of barriers to effective and accessible asthma care. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:510. [PMID: 27301341 PMCID: PMC4908765 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3181-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the UK, people of South Asian origin with asthma experience excess morbidity, with hospitalisation rates three times those of the majority White population and evidence suggests that South Asian children with asthma are more likely to suffer uncontrolled symptoms and hospital admissions with acute asthma compared to White British children. This paper draws on data from The Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) study to identify the operation of barriers to optimal care and good asthma control for South Asian children. Methods The MIA study followed a multi-phase, iterative, participatory design, underpinned by the socio-ecological model. Findings presented here are from face-to face, semi-structured interviews with South Asian (Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin) parents and carers of a child with asthma (n = 49). Interviews were conducted in English or relevant South Asian languages using specially trained community facilitators. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed according to the principles of interpretive thematic analysis, facilitated by the use of NVivo. Results Seven dimensions of candidacy are identified: identification of candidacy; navigation; the permeability of asthma services; appearances at health services; adjudications; offers and resistance and operating conditions in the local production of candidacy. The analysis demonstrates several ways in which a potential lack of alignment between the priorities and competencies of British South Asian families and the organization of health services combine to create vulnerabilities and difficulties in effectively managing childhood asthma. Conclusions Healthcare systems have a responsibility to develop services that are sensitive and appropriate to the needs of their communities. In South Asian communities, further efforts are required to raise awareness of symptoms and effectively communicate how, when and where to seek help for children. There is a need for improved diagnosis and consistent, effectively communicated information, especially regarding medication. Parents made several suggestions for improving services: presentations about asthma at easily accessible community venues; an advice centre or telephone helpline to answer queries; opportunities for sharing experiences with other families; having information provided in South Asian languages; longer GP appointments; extended use of asthma nurses; and better education for healthcare professionals to ensure consistency of care and advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Hawthorn Building, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | - Lorraine Culley
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Hawthorn Building, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Emma Angell
- SAPPHIRE Research Group, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lakhanpaul M, Bird D, Culley L, Hudson N, Robertson N, Johal N, McFeeters M, Hamlyn-Williams C, Johnson M. The use of a collaborative structured methodology for the development of a multifaceted intervention programme for the management of asthma (the MIA project), tailored to the needs of children and families of South Asian origin: a community-based, participatory study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2014. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr02280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAsthma is one of the most common chronic childhood illnesses in the UK. South Asian children are more likely to suffer from their asthma and be admitted to hospital. While this inequality needs to be addressed, standard behaviour-change interventions are known to be less successful in minority ethnic groups. Evidence suggests a need to enhance services provided to ethnic minority communities by developing culturally sensitive tailored interventions.ObjectivesThe Management and Interventions for Asthma (MIA) project aimed to test an iterative multiphase participatory approach to intervention development underpinned by the socioecological model of health, producing an intervention-planning framework and enhancing an evidence-based understanding of asthma management in South Asian and White British children.DesignInterviews and focus groups facilitated by community facilitators (CFs) were used to explore knowledge and perceptions of asthma among South Asian communities, children, families and healthcare professionals (HCPs). A smaller comparison group of White British families was recruited to identify aspects of asthma management that could be addressed either by generic interventions or by a tailored approach. Collaborative workshops were held to develop an intervention planning framework and to prioritise an aspect of asthma management that would be used as an exemplar for the development of the tailored, multifaceted asthma intervention programme.SettingThe community study was based in a largely urban environment in Leicester, UK.ParticipantsParticipants were recruited directly from the South Asian (Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi) and White British communities, and through the NHS. Children were aged between 4 and 12 years, with a range of asthma severity.Intervention developmentThe study had four phases. Phase 1 consisted of an evidence review of barriers and facilitators to asthma management in South Asian children. Phase 2 explored lay understandings of childhood asthma and its management among South Asian community members (n = 63). Phase 3 explored perceptions and experiences of asthma management among South Asian (n = 82) and White British families (n = 31) and HCP perspectives (n = 37). Using a modified intervention mapping approach incorporating psychological theory, phase 4 developed an intervention planning framework addressing the whole asthma pathway leading to the development of an exemplar multifaceted, integrated intervention programme called ‘ACT [Awareness, Context (cultural and organisational) and Training] on Asthma’.ResultsData on the social patterning of perceptions of asthma and a lack of alignment between the organisation of health services, and the priorities and competencies of British South Asian communities and families were produced. Eleven key problem areas along the asthma pathway were identified. A four-arm multifaceted tailored programme, ‘ACT on Asthma’, was developed, focusing on the theme ‘getting a diagnosis’. This theme was chosen following prioritisation by families during the collaborative workshops, demonstrating the participatory, iterative, phased approach used for the intervention design.ConclusionsThe MIA study demonstrated barriers to optimal asthma management in children at the family, provider and healthcare system levels and across the whole asthma pathway. Interventions need to address each of these levels to be effective. Minority ethnic communities can be successfully engaged in collaborative intervention development with a community-focused and culturally sensitive methodology.Future workFurther research is required to (1) assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed ‘ACT on Asthma’ programme, (2) develop methods to increase active participation of children in research and service development, (3) develop and test strategies to enhance public understanding of asthma in South Asian communities and (4) identify effective means of engaging the wider family in optimising asthma management.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lakhanpaul
- General and Adolescent Paediatrics Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical and Social Care Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Deborah Bird
- Department of Medical and Social Care Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Cheyne Child Development Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lorraine Culley
- School of Applied Social Sciences, Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Melanie McFeeters
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Charlotte Hamlyn-Williams
- General and Adolescent Paediatrics Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Mary Seacole Research Centre, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|