1
|
Weber MU, Petkowski JJ, Weber RE, Krajnik B, Stemplewski S, Panek M, Dziubak T, Mrozinska P, Piela A, Paluch E. Chip for dielectrophoretic microbial capture, separation and detection II: experimental study. Nanotechnology 2023; 34:175502. [PMID: 36640445 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/acb321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
In our previous paper we have modelled a dielectrophoretic force (DEP) and cell particle behavior in a microfluidic channel (Weber MUet al2023 Chip for dielectrophoretic microbial capture, separation and detection I: theoretical basis of electrode designNanotechnologythis issue). Here we test and confirm the results of our modeling work by experimentally validating the theoretical design constraints of the ring electrode architecture. We have compared and tested the geometry and particle capture and separation performance of the two separate electrode designs (the ring and dot electrode structures) by investigating bacterial motion in response to the applied electric field. We have quantitatively evaluated the electroosmosis (EO) to positive DEP (PDEP) transition in both electrode designs and explained the differences in capture efficiency of the ring and dot electrode systems. The ring structure shows 99% efficiency of bacterial capture both for PDEP and for EO. Moreover, the ring structure shows an over 200 faster bacterial response to the electric field. We have also established that the ring electrode architecture, with appropriate structure periodicity and spacing, results in efficient capture and separation of microbial cells. We have identified several critical design constraints that are required to achieve high efficiency bacterial capture. We have established that the spacing between consecutive DEP traps smaller than the length of the depletion zone will ensure that the DEP force dominates bacterial motion over motility and Brownian motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika U Weber
- Departments of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect St., New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | - Robert E Weber
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Bartosz Krajnik
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
- Department of Experimental Physics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. S. Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Slawomir Stemplewski
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
- Institute of Computer Science, Opole University, ul. Oleska 48, 45-052, Opole, Poland
| | - Marta Panek
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Dziubak
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Paulina Mrozinska
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Anna Piela
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Emil Paluch
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Tytusa Chałubińskiego 4, 50-376 Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weber MU, Petkowski JJ, Weber RE, Krajnik B, Stemplewski S, Panek M, Dziubak T, Mrozinska P, Piela A, Lo SL, Montanaro Ochoa HF, Yerino CD. Chip for dielectrophoretic microbial capture, separation and detection I: theoretical basis of electrode design. Nanotechnology 2023; 34:135502. [PMID: 36571849 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/acae5c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
We model the dielectrophoretic response ofE. colibacterial cells and red blood cells, upon exposure to an electric field. We model the separation, capture, and release mechanisms under flow conditions in a microfluidic channel and show under which conditions efficient separation of different cell types occurs. The modelling work is aimed to guide the separation electrode architecture and design for experimental validation of the model. The dielectrophoretic force is affected both by the geometry of the electrodes (the gradient of the electric field), the Re{CM(ω)} factor, and the permittivity of the medium ϵm. Our modelling makes testable predictions and shows that designing the electrode structure to ensure structure periodicity with spacing between consecutive traps smaller than the length of the depletion zone ensures efficient capture and separation. Such electrode system has higher capture and separation efficiency than systems with the established circular electrode architecture. The simulated, modelled microfluidic design allows for the separated bacteria, concentrated by dedicated dielectrophoretic regions, to be subsequently detected using label-free functionalized nanowire sensors. The experimental validation of the modelling work presented here and the validation of the theoretical design constraints of the chip electrode architecture is presented in the companion paper in the same issue (Weber MUet al2022 Chip for dielectrophoretic Microbial Capture, Separation and Detection II: Experimental Study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika U Weber
- Departments of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect St., 06520 New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | - Robert E Weber
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Bartosz Krajnik
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
- Department of Experimental Physics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. S. Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Slawomir Stemplewski
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
- Institute of Computer Science, Opole University, ul. Oleska 48, 45-052, Opole, Poland
| | - Marta Panek
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Dziubak
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Paulina Mrozinska
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Anna Piela
- Hener, Wrocław Technology Park, BETA Building, Room 104, Klecińska 125, 54-413, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Siu Lung Lo
- Departments of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect St., 06520 New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Hazael F Montanaro Ochoa
- Departments of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect St., 06520 New Haven, CT, United States of America
- Laboratory for Acoustics and Noise control, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dubendorf, Switzerland
| | - Christopher D Yerino
- Departments of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect St., 06520 New Haven, CT, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|