1
|
Xie W, Ravi P, Buyse M, Halabi S, Kantoff P, Sartor O, Soule H, Clarke N, Dignam J, James N, Fizazi K, Gillessen S, Mottet N, Murphy L, Parulekar W, Sandler H, Tombal B, Williams S, Sweeney CJ. Validation of metastasis-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in localized prostate cancer in the era of docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:285-292. [PMID: 38061427 PMCID: PMC10922430 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior work from the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate (ICECaP) consortium (ICECaP-1) demonstrated that metastasis-free survival (MFS) is a valid surrogate for overall survival (OS) in localized prostate cancer (PCa). This was based on data from patients treated predominantly before 2004, prior to docetaxel being available for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We sought to validate surrogacy in a more contemporary era (ICECaP-2) with greater availability of docetaxel and other systemic therapies for mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible trials for ICECaP-2 were those providing individual patient data (IPD) after publication of ICECaP-1 and evaluating adjuvant/salvage therapy for localized PCa, and which collected MFS and OS data. MFS was defined as distant metastases or death from any cause, and OS was defined as death from any cause. Surrogacy was evaluated using a meta-analytic two-stage validation model, with an R2 ≥ 0.7 defined a priori as clinically relevant. RESULTS A total of 15 164 IPD from 14 trials were included in ICECaP-2, with 70% of patients treated after 2004. The median follow-up was 8.3 years and the median postmetastasis survival was 3.1 years in ICECaP-2, compared with 1.9 years in ICECaP-1. For surrogacy condition 1, Kendall's tau was 0.92 for MFS with OS at the patient level, and R2 from weighted linear regression (WLR) of 8-year OS on 5-year MFS was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.82) at the trial level. For condition 2, R2 was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.89) from WLR of log[hazard ratio (HR)]-OS on log(HR)-MFS. The surrogate threshold effect on OS was an HR(MFS) of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS MFS remained a valid surrogate for OS in a more contemporary era, where patients had greater access to docetaxel and other systemic therapies for mCRPC. This supports the use of MFS as the primary outcome measure for ongoing adjuvant trials in localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Xie
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - P Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Buyse
- International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve; I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - H Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, USA
| | - N Clarke
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Dignam
- University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research & The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - S Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - N Mottet
- Mutualite Francoise Loire, St Etienne, France
| | - L Murphy
- Medical Research Council at UCL, London, UK
| | - W Parulekar
- Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Sandler
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - B Tombal
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Williams
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
| | - C J Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdel-Aty H, O'Shea L, Amos C, Brown LC, Grist E, Attard G, Clarke N, Cross W, Parker C, Parmar M, As NV, James N. The STAMPEDE2 Trial: a Site Survey of Current Patterns of Care, Access to Imaging and Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e628-e635. [PMID: 37507278 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The forthcoming STAMPEDE2 trial has three comparisons in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. We aim to determine clinical practices among STAMPEDE trial investigators for access to imaging and therapeutic choices and explore their interest in participation in STAMPEDE2. MATERIALS AND METHODS The survey was developed and distributed online to 120 UK STAMPEDE trial sites. Recipients were invited to complete the survey between 16 and 30 May 2022. The survey consisted of 30 questions in five sections on access to stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), 177lutetium-prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617), choice of systemic therapies and use of positron emission tomography/computerised tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS From 58/120 (48%) sites, 64 respondents completed the survey: 55/64 (86%) respondents were interested to participate in SABR, 44/64 (69%) in 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 56/64 (87.5%) in niraparib with abiraterone comparisons; 45/64 (70%) respondents had access to bone, spine and lymph node metastases SABR delivery and 7/64 (11%) to 177Lu-PSMA-617. In addition to androgen deprivation therapy, 60/64 (94%) respondents used androgen receptor signalling inhibitors and 46/64 (72%) used docetaxel; 29/64 (45%) respondents would consider triplet therapy with androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signalling inhibitors and docetaxel. Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography was available to 62/64 (97%) respondents and requested by 45/64 (70%) respondents for disease uncertainty on conventional imaging and 39/64 (61%) at disease relapse. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging was available to 24/64 (38%) respondents and requested by 13/64 (20%) respondents in highly selected patients. In low-volume disease, 38/64 (59%) respondents requested scans at baseline and disease relapse. In high-volume disease, 29/64 (45%) respondents requested scans at baseline, best response (at prostate-specific antigen nadir) and disease relapse; 54/64 (84%) respondents requested computerised tomography and bone scan for best response assessment. CONCLUSION There is noteworthy disparity in clinical practice across current study sites, however most have expressed an interest in participation in the forthcoming STAMPEDE2 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Abdel-Aty
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
| | - L O'Shea
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - C Amos
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - L C Brown
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - E Grist
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - G Attard
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Clarke
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| | - W Cross
- Department of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - C Parker
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Parmar
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - N Vas As
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N James
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sutera P, Shetty A, Hakansson A, Van der Eecken K, Song Y, Liu Y, Fonteyne V, Verbeke S, Song D, Ross AE, Feng FY, Gillessen S, Attard G, James N, Lotan TL, Davicioni E, Sweeney C, Tran PT, Deek MP, Ost P. Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Metastatic Disease Timing within Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e261-e262. [PMID: 37785002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is commonly partitioned into high- and low-volume subgroups which have demonstrated differential biology, prognosis, and response to therapy. Timing of metastasis has similarly demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes, however less is known about any potential underlying biologic differences between these disease states. Herein we aim to compare transcriptomic differences between synchronous and metachronous mCSPC and identify any differential responses to therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective review of men with mCSPC who completed RNA expression profiling evaluation of their primary tumor. Patients were stratified according to disease timing (synchronous vs metachronous). The primary endpoint was to identify differences in transcriptomic profiles between disease time. Median genomic scores between groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary analyses included determining clinical and transcriptomic variables associated with overall survival (OS) from time of metastasis. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier Method and Multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 252 patients were included with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Patients with synchronous disease experienced worse 5-yr OS (39% vs 79%, p<0.01) and demonstrated lower median Androgen Receptor Activity (AR-A) (11.78 vs 12.64, p<0.01) and Hallmark Androgen Response (HAR) (3.15 vs 3.32; p<0.01). Multivariable cox-regression identified only high-volume disease (HR = 4.97, 95% CI 2.71-9.10; p<0.01) and HAR score (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.02 significantly associated with OS. Finally, patients with synchronous (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; <0.01) but not metachronous (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.50-3.92; p = 0.56) disease were found to have better OS with Androgen Receptor (AR) + non-AR combination therapy as compared to monotherapy (p value for interaction = 0.05). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated a potential biologic difference between metastatic timing of mCSPC. Specifically, for patients with low volume disease, those with metachronous low volume disease have a more hormone dependent transcriptional profile and exhibit a better prognosis than synchronous low volume disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sutera
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Shetty
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - K Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Y Song
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Liu
- Decipher/Veractye, San Francisco, CA
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - F Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - S Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - G Attard
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - N James
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - T L Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - C Sweeney
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - P T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - M P Deek
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sutera P, Shetty A, Song Y, Hodges T, Hoang T, Rana ZH, Pienta K, Feng FY, Song D, DeWeese TL, Gillessen S, James N, Attard G, Deek MP, Tran PT. Identification of a Predictive Genomic Biomarker for Prostate Directed Therapy in Synchronous Low-Volume Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e441-e442. [PMID: 37785432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Standard of care management for metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) includes androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with docetaxel or second-generation anti-androgen therapy. Recently, randomized data has demonstrated radiotherapy to the prostate is associated with an improvement in overall survival among patients with low-volume metastatic disease. Tumor genomics represents an additional dimension to understand the clinical trajectory of patients with mCSPC. Herein we aim to evaluate a high-risk genomic signature for its ability to predict response to prostate directed therapy (PDT). MATERIALS/METHODS We performed a single institution retrospective review of men with low-volume mCSPC who underwent next-generation sequencing of their tumor. Patients were classified according to the presence of high-risk (HiRi) mutation including pathogenic mutations in either TP53, ATM, BRCA1/2, or Rb1. Our primary endpoint was to determine the effect of PDT on overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a HiRi mutation. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method compared with log-rank test and multivariable cox regression. Interaction between HiRi mutation and PDT was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 101 patients with synchronous low-volume CSPC were included in our analysis with a median follow-up of 44 months. Approximately half of patients were found to have a HiRi pathogenic mutation (48.5%) with TP53 mutations accounting for 75.5% of HiRi mutations. On multivariable cox regression PDT was associated with improvement in OS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.88; p = 0.03). When stratified by presence of HiRi mutation, PDT was not associated with any clinical outcome. Patients with HiRi mutations demonstrated a median OS of 73 vs 66.8 months (p = 0.28) for no PDT and PDT, respectively. Conversely, patients without a HiRi mutation demonstrated a significant improvement in median OS of 60 vs 105.3 months (p<0.01) for no PDT and PDT, respectively. The p-value for interaction for OS between PDT and HiRi mutation was statistically significant (p<0.01). CONCLUSION Here we have identified a high-risk genomic biomarker that appears predictive for response to PDT in men with synchronous low-volume mCSPC. Further work validating these results with prospective randomized data is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sutera
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Shetty
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Song
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - T Hodges
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - T Hoang
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Z H Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Pienta
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - F Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - D Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - T L DeWeese
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - N James
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - G Attard
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - M P Deek
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - P T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Philipps L, Porta N, James N, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Hall E. Correlation of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in the BC2001 Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:331-338. [PMID: 36918330 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate whether there is sufficient correlation between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) in bladder cancer follow-up post-radiotherapy to streamline data collection and to reduce trial follow-up burden on patients, clinicians and trial programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS PROs data were collected within the BC2001 trial using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy specific to bladder cancer (FACT-BL) questionnaire. CROs data were collected by clinicians using Late Effects in Normal Tissues Subjective, Objective and Management (LENT/SOM). Data were collected at baseline, post-treatment, at 6 and 12 months post-randomisation and then annually to 5 years. The percentage agreement between CROs and PROs measures was evaluated at 2 and 5 years post-randomisation. Concordance was tested using the weighted Kappa statistic with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Correlation was evaluated between six categories of the FACT-BL and LENT/SOM scores. At 2 years the percentage agreement across these domains ranged from 45 to 78%, with the weighted Kappa statistic between 0.07 and 0.35. Results were similar in year 5 with 48-83% agreement and kappa statistics between -0.02 and 0.21. CONCLUSION The correlation between CROs and PROs in patients treated with radiotherapy for bladder cancer were generally poor. PROs appear to be more sensitive, with higher grade events reported. Further work is needed to evaluate whether PROs alone can be used to evaluate toxicity-related outcomes in randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N Porta
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Philipps L, Porta N, James N, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Ballas L, Hall E. Differences in Quality of Life and Toxicity for Male and Female Patients following Chemo(radiotherapy) for Bladder Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e336-e343. [PMID: 36906497 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
AIMS BC2001, a randomised trial of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, demonstrated no difference in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or late toxicity between patients receiving radical radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy. This secondary analysis explored sex-based differences in HRQoL and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder (FACT-BL) HRQoL questionnaires at baseline, end of treatment, 6 months and annually until 5 years. Clinicians assessed toxicity with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects in Normal Tissues Subjective, Objective and Management (LENT/SOM) scoring systems at the same timepoints. The impact of sex on patient-reported HRQoL was evaluated using multivariate analyses of change in FACT-BL subscores from baseline to the timepoints of interest. For clinician-reported toxicity, differences were compared by calculating the proportion of patients with grade 3-4 toxicities occurring over the follow-up period. RESULTS For both males and females, all FACT-BL subscores had a reduction in HRQoL at the end of treatment. For males, the mean bladder cancer subscale (BLCS) score remained stable through to year 5. For females, there was a decline in BLCS from baseline at years 2 and 3 with a return to baseline at year 5. At year 3, females had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful worsening of mean BLCS score (-5.18; 95% confidence interval -8.37 to -1.99), which was not seen in males (0.24; -0.76 to 1.23). RTOG toxicity was more frequent in females than males (27% versus 16%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION Results suggest that female patients treated with radiotherapy ± chemotherapy for localised bladder cancer report worse treatment-related toxicity in post-treatment years 2 and 3 than males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Philipps
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N Porta
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - L Ballas
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones C, Sachdeva A, Murphy L, Murray M, Brown L, Brown J, Mc Closkey E, Attard G, Parmar M, James N, Sydes M, Clarke N. Clinical fracture incidence in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and risk-reduction following addition of zoledronic acid to androgen deprivation therapy with or without docetaxel: Long-term results from the STAMPEDE trial. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01237-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
8
|
Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke N, Cross W, Gillessen S, Amos C, Brawley C, Jones R, Pezaro C, Malik Z, Montazeri A, Millman R, Cook A, Gilbert D, Langley R, Parker C, Sydes M, Brown L, Parmar M, James N. LBA62 Comparison of abiraterone acetate and prednisolone (AAP) or combination enzalutamide (ENZ) + AAP for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): Overall survival (OS) results of 2 randomised phase III trials from the STAMPEDE protocol. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
9
|
Pradhan V, James N, Conroy C. P.45 Retrospective review of perioperative analgesia for caesarean section comparing intrathecal morphine with combined intrathecal morphine and fentanyl. Int J Obstet Anesth 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
10
|
Oyewole B, Liu C, James N, Sandhya A, Ma J, Jethwa P. 1135 Improving Surgical Discharge Summaries. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Discharge summaries are a means of communication to the patient, the GP and for medical records. An initial audit showed surgical discharge summaries contained misleading information and sometimes omitted relevant information. Changes were implemented to improve the accuracy of surgical discharge summaries.
Method
The initial audit assessed the accuracy of discharge summaries over a two-week period and the re-audit was conducted after implementation of change over a similar time period. Data was extracted from electronic patient records (EPR). Change implementation included educating the surgical team on the need for accurate discharge summaries. The EPR team was notified of the intrinsic error in the PowerChart system which is widely used in various NHS Trust.
Results
Incidence of misdiagnosis or misleading diagnosis in discharge summaries reduced from 42% to zero, lack of relevant investigations decreased from 7% to 1%, No follow up status reduced from 23% to 10% (usually post appendicectomy patients which are not routinely followed up but this needs to be stated in the discharge summary for clarity), at both initial audit and re-audit all patients had relevant surgery or procedures done included in their discharge summaries while the rate at which relevant medications were not stated in the discharge summary decreased from 4% to zero.
Conclusions
Discharge summaries are vital for record keeping and are usually the only written information a patient receives regarding their hospital stay. It is important that errors in EPR systems be flagged up for review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Oyewole
- East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| | - C Liu
- East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| | - N James
- East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| | - A Sandhya
- East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| | - J Ma
- East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| | - P Jethwa
- East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bamias A, Merseburger AS, Loriot Y, James N, Choy E, Castellano D, Lopez-Rios F, Calabrò F, Kramer M, de Velasco G, Zakopoulou R, Tzannis K, Sternberg CN. SAUL, a single-arm study of atezolizumab for chemotherapy-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the urinary tract: outcomes by key baseline factors, PD-L1 expression and prior platinum therapy. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100152. [PMID: 33984672 PMCID: PMC8134736 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of pretreatment factors on immune checkpoint inhibition in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) deserves further evaluation. The aim was to study the association of Bellmunt risk factors, time from last chemotherapy (TFLC), previous therapy and PD-L1 expression with atezolizumab efficacy in platinum-refractory aUC. Patients and methods This was a post-hoc analysis of patients who had received prior cisplatin or carboplatin in the prospective, single-arm, phase IIIb SAUL study (NCT02928406). Patients were treated with 3-weekly atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Relationships were analysed using Cox regression and long-rank test. Results Of 997 patients in SAUL, 969 were eligible for this analysis. The number of Bellmunt risk factors was associated with OS (P < 0.001); median OS (mOS) for 0, 1 and 2-3 risk factors was 17.9, 8.9 and 3.3 months, respectively. Significant associations were also observed between OS and TFLC (P < 0.001), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (P = 0.002), and prior perioperative chemotherapy (P = 0.013); mOS was 6.97 versus 11.63 months for TFLC ≤6 versus >6 months, 7.75 versus 11.6 months for PD-L1 expression on <1% of tumour-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) (IC0)/expression on 1% to <5% of tumour-infiltrating ICs (IC1) versus expression on ≥5% of tumour-infiltrating ICs (IC2/3) and 10.2 versus 7.8 months for prior versus no prior perioperative chemotherapy, respectively. The type of platinum compound and number of previous treatment lines were not associated with outcomes. Conclusions Post-platinum atezolizumab is active in aUC, irrespective of previous platinum compound and lines of therapy. Bellmunt risk stratification, PD-L1 expression, TFLC and perioperative chemotherapy were identified as prognostic factors for OS with second-line atezolizumab, indicating the need for novel prognostic signatures for immunotherapy-treated patients with aUC. Bellmunt stratification is an accepted risk algorithm in second-line chemotherapy for aUC. The impact of pretreatment factors on immune checkpoint inhibition in aUC requires further evaluation. We studied the prognostic significance of pretreatment factors in post-platinum immunotherapy of aUC in real-world setting. Bellmunt factors, TFLC, prior therapy and PD-L1 expression were identified as prognostic factors. Our results suggest a need for novel prognostic signatures for immunotherapy in aUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - A S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein-Lu¨beck, Lu¨beck, Germany
| | - Y Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - N James
- Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - E Choy
- CREATE Centre, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Lopez-Rios
- Pathology Laboratory of Therapeutic Targets, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Calabrò
- GU Oncology Unit, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - M Kramer
- Department of Urology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein-Lu¨beck, Lu¨beck, Germany
| | - G de Velasco
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Zakopoulou
- Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - K Tzannis
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - C N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gladding P, James N, Bhoothpur C, Laurie A. Data Mining, DNA Sequencing and Polygenic Risk Scores in Familial Hypercholesterolaemia. Heart Lung Circ 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Miller K, James N, Oliver M, Ou J, Emerson J, Borgstadt A, DiSilvestro P, Ribeiro J. Immune modeling analysis identifies ICOS and CTLA-4 as predictive biomarkers in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
14
|
Bamias A, Merseburger A, Loriot Y, James N, Choy E, Castellano Gauna D, Lopez-Rios F, Calabro F, Kramer M, de Velasco G, Zakopoulou R, Tzannis K, Sternberg C. 748P Prognostic factors related to post-platinum atezolizumab for relapsed metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) from the SAUL study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
15
|
Patel K, Choudhury A, Hoskin P, Varughese M, James N, Huddart R, Birtle A. Clinical Guidance for the Management of Patients with Urothelial Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Rapid Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:347-353. [PMID: 32389318 PMCID: PMC7180390 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic presents a substantial obstacle to cancer patient care. Data from China as well as risk models suppose that cancer patients, particularly those on active, immunosuppressive therapies are at higher risks of severe infection from the illness. In addition, staff illness and restructuring of services to deal with the crisis will inevitably place treatment capacities under significant strain. These guidelines aim to expand on those provided by NHS England regarding cancer care during the coronavirus pandemic by examining the known literature and provide guidance in managing patients with urothelial and rarer urinary tract cancers. In particular, they address the estimated risk and benefits of standard treatments and consider the alternatives in the current situation. As a result, it is recommended that this guidance will help form a framework for shared decision making with patients. Moreover, they do not advise a one-size-fits-all approach but recommend continual assessment of the situation with discussion within and between centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Patel
- The Rosemere Cancer Centre, Preston, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - M Varughese
- The Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - N James
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Birtle
- The Rosemere Cancer Centre, Preston, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation, UK; Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gladding P, James N, Hewitt W. A057 Multiscale Predictive Modelling in Heart Failure: Machine Learning Applied to Big Data, Imaging and Multiomics. Heart Lung Circ 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.05.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
17
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poole OV, Uchiyama T, Skorupinska I, Skorupinska M, Germain L, Kozyra D, Holmes S, James N, Bugiardini E, Woodward C, Quinlivan R, Emmanuel A, Hanna MG, Panicker JN, Pitceathly RDS. Urogenital symptoms in mitochondrial disease: overlooked and undertreated. Eur J Neurol 2019; 26:1111-1120. [PMID: 30884027 PMCID: PMC6767393 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Bowel symptoms are well documented in mitochondrial disease. However, data concerning other pelvic organs is limited. A large case–control study has therefore been undertaken to determine the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual dysfunction in adults with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease. Methods Adults with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease and control subjects were recruited from a specialist mitochondrial clinic. The presence and severity of LUTS and their impact on quality of life, in addition to sexual dysfunction and bowel symptoms, were captured using four validated questionnaires. Subgroup analysis was undertaken in patients harbouring the m.3243A>G MT‐TL1 mitochondrial DNA mutation. A subset of patients underwent urodynamic studies to further characterize their LUTS. Results Data from 58 patients and 19 controls (gender and age matched) were collected. Adults with mitochondrial disease had significantly more overactive bladder (81.5% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.039) and low stream (34.5% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.013) urinary symptoms than controls. Urodynamic studies in 10 patients confirmed that bladder storage symptoms predominate. Despite high rates of LUTS, none of the patient group was receiving treatment. Female patients and those harbouring the m.3243A>G MT‐TL1 mutation experienced significantly more sexual dysfunction than controls (53.1% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.026, and 66.7% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions Lower urinary tract symptoms are common but undertreated in adult mitochondrial disease, and female patients and those harbouring the m.3243A>G MT‐TL1 mutation experience sexual dysfunction. Given their impact on quality of life, screening for and treating LUTS and sexual dysfunction in adults with mitochondrial disease are strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O V Poole
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - T Uchiyama
- Department of Uro-Neurology, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - I Skorupinska
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - M Skorupinska
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - L Germain
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - D Kozyra
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - S Holmes
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - N James
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - E Bugiardini
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - C Woodward
- Neurogenetics Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - R Quinlivan
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Emmanuel
- Gastro-Intestinal Physiology Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - M G Hanna
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - J N Panicker
- Department of Uro-Neurology, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - R D S Pitceathly
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shah M, Paulson D, Bassett R, Herring D, Scott R, Herrera M, James N. PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FOR A FEASIBLE DEMENTIA CAREGIVER SUPPORT GROUP IN A PRIMARY CARE SETTING. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.1725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Shah
- University of Central Florida
| | | | | | | | - R Scott
- University of Central Florida
| | | | - N James
- University of Central Florida
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
James N. YOUNG ADULT CAREGIVER NEEDS AND PREFERENCES: A CROSS-SECTIONAL EXPLORATION OF DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.1096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N James
- University of Central Florida
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
James N, Smith C. 115IMPROVING ACCESS TO INTRA-ARTERIAL TREATMENT FOR ACUTE ISCHAEMIC STROKE AT SALFORD ROYAL FOUNDATION TRUST. Age Ageing 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy126.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N James
- Greater Manchester Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust
| | - C Smith
- Greater Manchester Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Grist E, Parry M, Mendes L, Santos Vidal S, Kudahetti S, Gilson C, Anjum M, Atako N, Ingleby F, James N, Clarke N, Sydes M, Parmar M, Chowdhury S, Jones R, Leung H, Eeles R, Waugh D, Berney D, Attard G. Implementing molecular characterisation of prostate cancer tissue from patients recruited to the multi-centre STAMPEDE trial: The STRATOSPHERE consortium. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy318.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Wetzel PA, Lindblad AS, Raizada H, James N, Mulatya C, Kannan MA, Villamar Z, Gitchel GT, Weaver LK. Eye Tracking Results in Postconcussive Syndrome Versus Normative Participants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018; 59:4011-4019. [PMID: 30098189 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-23815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Standard physical, neurologic, and neuropsychologic examinations may not detect abnormalities after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). An analysis of eye movements may be more sensitive to neurologic dysfunction. Methods We performed eye tracking assessments in 71 active duty and veteran military personnel with persistent postconcussive symptoms (3 months to 5 years after mTBI) and 75 volunteers with no history of brain injury. Both eyes were sampled at 500 Hz and analyzed for various eye measurement parameters during visual tasks involving the saccadic and smooth systems. Results No difference between mTBI and normal participants in main sequence profiles was observed. On the circular task, intersaccadic interval duration was shorter in mTBI compared with normal subjects (horizontal: Cohen's D = -0.65; vertical: Cohen's D = -0.75). For reading, absolute saccadic amplitudes (Cohen's D = -0.76) and average forward saccadic amplitudes were lower (Cohen's D = -0.61). Absolute fixation velocity was higher (Cohen's D = 1.02), and overall fixation durations (Cohen's D = 0.58), regression durations (Cohen's D = 0.49), and forward saccadic durations (Cohen's D=0.54) were longer. mTBI participants had more fixations (Cohen's D = 0.54) and regressions per line (Cohen's D = 0.70) and read fewer lines (Cohen's D = -0.38) than normal subjects. On the horizontal ramp task, mTBI participants had lower weighted smooth pursuit gains (Cohen's D = -0.55). On the horizontal step task, mTBI participants had shorter mean fixation times (Cohen's D = -0.55). Conclusions These results suggest vulnerability of the smooth pursuit and saccadic systems in mTBI. Eye tracking shows promise as an objective, sensitive assessment of damage after mTBI. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01611194, NCT01925963.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Wetzel
- Lovelace Biomedical Research, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
| | | | - Hardik Raizada
- The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland, United States
| | - Nathan James
- The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland, United States
| | | | - Mary A Kannan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
| | - Zoe Villamar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
| | - George T Gitchel
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
| | - Lindell K Weaver
- Division of Hyperbaric Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, United States.,Intermountain LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.,Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Oliver M, Ribeiro J, James N, Cantillo E, Yano N. HE4 sabotages cytotoxic mononuclear cells via inducing dual specificity phosphatase 6 secretion. Gynecol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
25
|
Nguyen QH, Pervolarakis N, Blake K, Ma D, Davis RT, James N, Phung AT, Willey E, Kumar R, Jabart E, Driver I, Rock J, Goga A, Khan SA, Lawson DA, Werb Z, Kessenbrock K. Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity. Nat Commun 2018; 9:2028. [PMID: 29795293 PMCID: PMC5966421 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04334-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer arises from breast epithelial cells that acquire genetic alterations leading to subsequent loss of tissue homeostasis. Several distinct epithelial subpopulations have been proposed, but complete understanding of the spectrum of heterogeneity and differentiation hierarchy in the human breast remains elusive. Here, we use single-cell mRNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to profile the transcriptomes of 25,790 primary human breast epithelial cells isolated from reduction mammoplasties of seven individuals. Unbiased clustering analysis reveals the existence of three distinct epithelial cell populations, one basal and two luminal cell types, which we identify as secretory L1- and hormone-responsive L2-type cells. Pseudotemporal reconstruction of differentiation trajectories produces one continuous lineage hierarchy that closely connects the basal lineage to the two differentiated luminal branches. Our comprehensive cell atlas provides insights into the cellular blueprint of the human breast epithelium and will form the foundation to understand how the system goes awry during breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quy H Nguyen
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Nicholas Pervolarakis
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Kerrigan Blake
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Dennis Ma
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Ryan Tevia Davis
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Nathan James
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Anh T Phung
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Elizabeth Willey
- Department of Anatomy and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0452, USA
| | - Raj Kumar
- Department of Anatomy and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0452, USA
| | - Eric Jabart
- ProteinSimple, 3001 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA, 95134, USA
| | - Ian Driver
- Department of Anatomy and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0452, USA
| | - Jason Rock
- Department of Anatomy and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0452, USA
| | - Andrei Goga
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0452, USA
| | - Seema A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Devon A Lawson
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Zena Werb
- Department of Anatomy and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0452, USA.
| | - Kai Kessenbrock
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
James N, Holmes S, Skorupinska I, Germain L, Sud R, Hanna M, Matthews E. Pilot study to explore the frequency and severity of pain in skeletal muscle channelopathies. Neuromuscul Disord 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8966(18)30374-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
27
|
Ramdharry G, Jones F, Holmes S, James N, Booth S, Reilly M, Hanna M. Neuro-muscular bridges: development of an evidence based selfmanagement resource for people with neuro-muscular diseases. Neuromuscul Disord 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8966(18)30412-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
28
|
James N. SP-0020: Organ preservation in bladder cancer – an evidence-based alternative to radical surgery. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30331-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
29
|
James N, de Bono J, Spears M, Clarke N, Mason M, Dearnaley D, Ritchie A, Russell M, Gilson C, Jones R, Gillessen S, Matheson D, Aung S, Birtle A, Chowdhury S, Gale J, Malik Z, O'Sullivan J, Parmar M, Sydes M. Adding abiraterone for patients (pts) with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): Outcomes in non-metastatic (M0) patients from STAMPEDE (NCT00268476). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
30
|
Pezaro C, Omlin A, Mastris K, Attard G, Beer T, Chi K, Chowdhury S, Davis I, Drake C, de Bono J, Efstathiou E, Gravis G, Higano C, Hussain M, James N, Logothetis C, Morgans A, Parker C, Ryan C, Saad F, Sartor O, Small E, Sternberg C, Sweeney C, Tannock I, Tombal B, Gillessen S. Precision, complexity and stigma in advanced prostate cancer terminology: it is time to move away from ‘castration-resistant’ prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1692-1694. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- A. Scoulding
- Department of Sports Science, University of Wales Swansea, Vivian Tower, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| | - N. James
- Department of Sports Science, University of Wales Swansea, Vivian Tower, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| | - J. Taylor
- Department of Sports Science, University of Wales Swansea, Vivian Tower, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- P. D. Jones
- Department of Sports Science, University of Wales Swansea, Vivian Tower, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| | - N. James
- Department of Sports Science, University of Wales Swansea, Vivian Tower, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| | - S. D. Mellalieu
- Department of Sports Science, University of Wales Swansea, Vivian Tower, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Holmes S, Male A, Ramdharry G, Quinlivan R, Bugiardini E, Poole O, James N, Hanna M. Service evaluation exploring the incidence of vestibular and balance dysfunction in people with mitochondrial disease. Neuromuscul Disord 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8966(17)30284-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
34
|
Huddart R, Hall E, Miranda M, Crundwell M, Jenkins P, Rawlings C, Tremlett J, Hendron C, Lewis R, Porta N, Hussain S, James N. Quality of life (QL) of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients (pts) receiving radiotherapy (RT) +/- chemotherapy (CT) in the BC2001 trial (CRUK/01/004). Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(17)30676-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
35
|
Howe K, James N, Gladding P, Prabhakar C, Gavin A, Dawson L. Predicting CRT Response Using Machine Learning Analysis of Pre-Implant ECG Data. Heart Lung Circ 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
36
|
Crawley D, van Hemelrijck M, Chowdhury S, James N, Gilson C, Spears M, Sydes M, Rudman S. Effect of baseline metabolic aberrations in men with locally advanced/metastatic prostate cancer treated with ADT on time to disease progression, prostate cancer specific and all cause death. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw372.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
37
|
Wang Y, Sundfeldt K, Mateoiu C, Shih IM, Kurman RJ, Schaefer J, Silliman N, Kinde I, Springer S, Foote M, Kristjansdottir B, James N, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Diaz LA, Vogelstein B. Diagnostic potential of tumor DNA from ovarian cyst fluid. eLife 2016; 5. [PMID: 27421040 PMCID: PMC4946896 DOI: 10.7554/elife.15175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We determined whether the mutations found in ovarian cancers could be identified in the patients' ovarian cyst fluids. Tumor-specific mutations were detectable in the cyst fluids of 19 of 23 (83%) borderline tumors, 10 of 13 (77%) type I cancers, and 18 of 18 (100%) type II cancers. In contrast, no mutations were found in the cyst fluids of 18 patients with benign tumors or non-neoplastic cysts. Though large, prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and clinical utility of this approach, our results suggest that the genetic evaluation of cyst fluids might be able to inform the management of the large number of women with these lesions. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15175.001 More than a third of women develop ovarian cysts during their lifetimes. The vast majority of these cysts are harmless, but a small number are caused by ovarian cancers. These cancers often produce no symptoms until the disease has spread throughout the abdomen or to other organs, so many women go undiagnosed until their chances of being successfully treated are low. Currently, there is no reliable way to determine whether an ovarian cyst is cancerous without performing surgery. As a result, many women undergo unnecessary, invasive surgeries for harmless ovarian cysts. Tumors shed cells and cell fragments into any fluid that surrounds them. Fluids from cysts in the pancreas, kidney, and thyroid are routinely examined to identify whether they contain cancerous cells. Now, Wang, Sundfeldt et al. show that ovarian cancers also shed DNA into the surrounding cyst fluid. Furthermore, mutations found in this DNA can provide valuable information about whether the cysts are cancerous. The study was performed by extracting DNA from the fluid in ovarian cysts that had been surgically removed from 77 women. Of these cysts, 10 were harmless cysts, 12 were benign tumors, 31 were invasive cancers, and 24 were so-called borderline tumors, which fall somewhere between the benign tumors and invasive cancers. Only cysts associated with the borderline tumors and invasive cancers need to be surgically removed. Here, Wang, Sundfeldt et al. report that DNA mutations that are characteristic of ovarian cancers were found in 87% of the cysts associated with borderline tumors and invasive cancers. In contrast, these mutations were not found in any of the cysts that do not require surgery. Fluid can be extracted from an ovarian cyst with a needle during an outpatient visit. Therefore, the results presented by Wang, Sundfeldt et al. suggest a relatively straightforward way of testing the DNA from ovarian cysts before deciding whether surgery is really necessary. First, however, larger studies that follow women with cysts over time will be necessary to confirm that this type of testing is effective and safe. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15175.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxuan Wang
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, United States
| | - Robert J Kurman
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, United States
| | - Joy Schaefer
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Natalie Silliman
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Isaac Kinde
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Simeon Springer
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Michael Foote
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Swim Across America Laboratory, Baltimore, United States
| | - Björg Kristjansdottir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nathan James
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Swim Across America Laboratory, Baltimore, United States
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Ludwig Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wang Y, Springer S, Mulvey CL, Silliman N, Schaefer J, Sausen M, James N, Rettig EM, Guo T, Pickering CR, Bishop JA, Chung CH, Califano JA, Eisele DW, Fakhry C, Gourin CG, Ha PK, Kang H, Kiess A, Koch WM, Myers JN, Quon H, Richmon JD, Sidransky D, Tufano RP, Westra WH, Bettegowda C, Diaz LA, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Agrawal N. Detection of somatic mutations and HPV in the saliva and plasma of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Sci Transl Med 2016; 7:293ra104. [PMID: 26109104 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa8507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 310] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To explore the potential of tumor-specific DNA as a biomarker for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), we queried DNA from saliva or plasma of 93 HNSCC patients. We searched for somatic mutations or human papillomavirus genes, collectively referred to as tumor DNA. When both plasma and saliva were tested, tumor DNA was detected in 96% of 47 patients. The fractions of patients with detectable tumor DNA in early- and late-stage disease were 100% (n = 10) and 95% (n = 37), respectively. When segregated by site, tumor DNA was detected in 100% (n = 15), 91% (n = 22), 100% (n = 7), and 100% (n = 3) of patients with tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx, respectively. In saliva, tumor DNA was found in 100% of patients with oral cavity cancers and in 47 to 70% of patients with cancers of the other sites. In plasma, tumor DNA was found in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancers, and in 86 to 100% of patients with cancers of the other sites. Thus, saliva is preferentially enriched for tumor DNA from the oral cavity, whereas plasma is preferentially enriched for tumor DNA from the other sites. Tumor DNA in saliva was found postsurgically in three patients before clinical diagnosis of recurrence, but in none of the five patients without recurrence. Tumor DNA in the saliva and plasma appears to be a potentially valuable biomarker for detection of HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxuan Wang
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Simeon Springer
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Carolyn L Mulvey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Natalie Silliman
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joy Schaefer
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Mark Sausen
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Personal Genome Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | - Nathan James
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Eleni M Rettig
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Theresa Guo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Curtis R Pickering
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Justin A Bishop
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Christine H Chung
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joseph A Califano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Milton J. Dance Head and Neck Center, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21204, USA
| | - David W Eisele
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Carole Fakhry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Milton J. Dance Head and Neck Center, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21204, USA
| | - Christine G Gourin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Milton J. Dance Head and Neck Center, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21204, USA
| | - Hyunseok Kang
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ana Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Wayne M Koch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Harry Quon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Jeremy D Richmon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - David Sidransky
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ralph P Tufano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - William H Westra
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Nishant Agrawal
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Selby V, Ramdharry G, Balls D, James N, Hogrel J, Hanna M, Muntoni F. Fatigability during functional outcome measures in participants with myasthenic conditions. Neuromuscul Disord 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2015.06.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Carducci M, Armstrong A, Pili R, Ng S, Huddart R, Agarwal N, Khvorostenko D, Lyulko O, Brize A, Vogelzang N, Delva R, Harza M, Thanos A, James N, Werbrouck P, Bögemann M, Hutson T, Milecki P, Nederman T, Sternberg C. 4BA A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tasquinimod (TASQ) in men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
41
|
Huddart R, Porta N, Lewis R, Hendron C, Hussein S, James N, Hall E. 2507 Prognostic factors in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in the BC2001 trial (CRUK/01/004). Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31328-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
42
|
McDonald F, Waters R, Gulliford S, Hall E, James N, Huddart RA. Defining bowel dose volume constraints for bladder radiotherapy treatment planning. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27:22-9. [PMID: 25445550 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Revised: 09/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Increases to radiotherapy dose are constrained by normal tissue effects. The relationship between bowel dose volume data and late bowel toxicity in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with radical radiotherapy was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The bowel was contoured retrospectively on radiotherapy plans of 47 patients recruited to the BC2001 trial (CRUK/01/004). The relationship between bowel volume at various dose levels and prospectively collected late bowel toxicity was explored. RESULTS Fifteen per cent and 6% of patients experienced grade 1 and grade 2 or more late bowel toxicity, respectively. The mean bowel volume was significantly less at doses ≥50 Gy in those treated with reduced high dose volume radiotherapy compared with standard radiotherapy. The probability of late bowel toxicity increased as bowel volume increased (P ≤ 0.05 for dose levels 30-50 Gy). No grade 2 or more late bowel toxicity was observed in patients with bowel volumes under the thresholds given in the model that predict for 25% probability of late bowel toxicity. CONCLUSIONS There is a dose volume effect for late bowel toxicity in radical bladder radiotherapy. We have modelled the probability of late bowel toxicity from absolute bowel volumes to guide clinicians in assessing radical bladder radiotherapy plans. Thresholds predicting for a 25% probability of late bowel toxicity are proposed as dose volume constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F McDonald
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - R Waters
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Gulliford
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- Clinical Trials Unit Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - R A Huddart
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate mortality and death-censored graft loss according to year of kidney transplant (KT) between 1990 and 2011. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). PARTICIPANTS KT recipients aged 65 and older at the time of transplantation (N = 30,207). MEASUREMENTS Mortality and death-censored graft loss ascertained through center report and linkage to Social Security Death Master File and to Medicare. RESULTS Older adults currently account for 18.4% of KT recipients, up from 3.4% in 1990; similar increases were noted for deceased donor (5.4 times percentage increase) and live donor (9.1 times percentage increase) transplants. Current recipients are not only older, but also more likely to be female and African American, have lengthier pretransplant dialysis, have diabetes mellitus or hypertension, and receive marginal kidneys. Mortality for older deceased donor recipients between 2009 and 2011 was 57% lower (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33-0.56, P < .001) than between 1990 and 1993; mortality for older live donor recipients was 50% lower (HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.36-0.68, P < .001). Death-censored graft loss for older deceased donor recipients between 2009 and 2011 was 65% lower (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.29-0.42, P < .001) than between 1990 and 1993; death-censored graft loss for older live donor recipients was 59% lower (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.24-0.70, P < .001). CONCLUSION Despite a major increase in number of older adults transplanted and an expanding window of transplant eligibility, mortality and graft loss have decreased substantially for this recipient population. These trends are important to understand for patient counseling and transplant referral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Logue J, Wedel S, Chodacki A, Sartor O, Nilsson S, Coleman R, James N, Aksnes A, Wahba M, Parker C. Reasons for Patients (Pts) Discontinuing Study Treatment (Tx) in the Phase 3 Alsympca Trial of Radium-223 Dichloride (Ra-223) in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (Crpc) with Bone Metastases (Mets). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu336.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
45
|
James N, Spears M, Clarke N, Sydes M, Parker C, Dearnaley D, Russell J, Ritchie A, Thalmann G, de Bono J, Attard G, Amos C, Parmar M, Mason M. Impact of Node Status and Radiotherapy on Failure-Free Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Data from >690 Patients in the Control Arm of the Stampede Trial. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu336.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
46
|
Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, Togneri FS, James N, Maher EJ, Meller CH, Williams D, Wapner RJ, Maher ER, Kilby MD. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:610-620. [PMID: 23512800 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2013] [Revised: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 03/01/2013] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is utilized in prenatal diagnosis to detect chromosomal abnormalities not visible by conventional karyotyping. A prospective cohort of women undergoing fetal CMA and karyotyping following abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings is presented in the context of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature describing detection rates by CMA and karyotyping. METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of 243 women undergoing CMA alongside karyotyping when a structural abnormality was detected on prenatal ultrasound. A systematic review of the literature was also performed. MEDLINE (1970-Dec 2012), EMBASE (1980-Dec 2012) and CINAHL (1982-June 2012) databases were searched electronically. Selected studies included > 10 cases and prenatal CMA in addition to karyotyping. The search yielded 560 citations. Full papers were retrieved for 86, and 25 primary studies were included in the systematic review. RESULTS Our cohort study found an excess detection rate of abnormalities by CMA of 4.1% over conventional karyotyping when the clinical indication for testing was an abnormal fetal ultrasound finding; this was lower than the detection rate of 10% (95% CI, 8-13%) by meta-analysis. The rate of detection for variants of unknown significance (VOUS) was 2.1% (95% CI, 1.3-3.3%) when the indication for CMA was an abnormal scan finding. The VOUS detection rate was lower (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.5-3.7%) when any indication for prenatal CMA was meta-analyzed. CONCLUSION We present evidence for a higher detection rate by CMA than by karyotyping not just in the case of abnormal ultrasound findings but also in cases of other indications for invasive testing. It is likely that CMA will replace karyotyping in high-risk pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C Hillman
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe two cases of retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP)-like lesion following radiation therapy for primary tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective evaluation of two patients with previous irradiation treatment for a pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland and a vocal cord carcinoma, respectively. Visual acuity (VA), fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography were performed and demonstrated a RAP-like lesion in both cases. Treatment with intravitreal injections of Ranibizumab was performed with a follow-up of 19 and 10 months, respectively. RESULTS Both the patients had a positive response to the treatment with improvement in VA and reduction of intraretinal fluid. CONCLUSION RAP-like lesions can develop following radiation treatment for a primary tumor. In patients presenting with idiopathic RAP, a history of prior radiotherapy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G De Salvo
- Southampton Eye Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Massard C, James N, Culine S, Jones R, Vuorela A, Mustonen M, Fizazi K. Arades Trial: A First-in-Man, Open-Label, Phase I/II Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Proof-of-Concept Study of ODM-201 in Patients (PTS) with Progressive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (MCRPC). Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(20)34330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
49
|
Bourne SC, Wilkinson T, Kruk H, Austin K, Watson J, James N. P104 Southampton City: finding the missing millions and reducing admissions through medical intelligence. Thorax 2011. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201054c.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
50
|
Berger JC, Muzaale AD, James N, Hoque M, Wang JMG, Montgomery RA, Massie AB, Hall EC, Segev DL. Living kidney donors ages 70 and older: recipient and donor outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6:2887-93. [PMID: 22034505 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04160511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The profound organ shortage has resulted in longer waiting times and increased mortality for those awaiting kidney transplantation. Consequently, patients are turning to older living donors. It is unclear if an upper age limit for donation should exist, both in terms of recipient and donor outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In the United States, 219 healthy adults aged ≥70 have donated kidneys at 80 of 279 transplant centers. Competing risks models with matched controls were used to study the independent association between older donor age and allograft survival, accounting for the competing risk of recipient mortality as well as other transplant factors. RESULTS Among recipients of older live donor allografts, graft loss was significantly higher than matched 50-to 59-year-old live donor allografts (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 2.28, P = 0.005) but similar to matched nonextended criteria 50-to 59-year-old deceased donor allografts (SHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.63, P = 0.3). Mortality among living kidney donors aged ≥70 was no higher than healthy matched controls drawn from the NHANES-III cohort; in fact, mortality was lower, probably reflecting higher selectivity among older live donors than could be captured in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES-III; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These findings support living donation among older adults but highlight the advantages of finding a younger donor, particularly for younger recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan C Berger
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|