PANC Study (Pancreatitis: A National Cohort Study): national cohort study examining the first 30 days from presentation of acute pancreatitis in the UK

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common, yet complex, emergency surgical presentation. Multiple guidelines exist and management can vary significantly. The aim of this first UK, multicentre, prospective cohort study was to assess the variation in management of acute pancreatitis to guide resource planning and optimize treatment.

METHODS

All patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years presenting with acute pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria, from March to April 2021 were eligible for inclusion and followed up for 30 days. Anonymized data were uploaded to a secure electronic database in line with local governance approvals.

RESULTS

A total of 113 hospitals contributed data on 2580 patients, with an equal sex distribution and a mean age of 57 years. The aetiology was gallstones in 50.6 per cent, with idiopathic the next most common (22.4 per cent). In addition to the 7.6 per cent with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, 20.1 per cent of patients had a previous episode of acute pancreatitis. One in 20 patients were classed as having severe pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria. The overall mortality rate was 2.3 per cent at 30 days, but rose to one in three in the severe group. Predictors of death included male sex, increased age, and frailty; previous acute pancreatitis and gallstones as aetiologies were protective. Smoking status and body mass index did not affect death.

CONCLUSION

Most patients presenting with acute pancreatitis have a mild, self-limiting disease. Rates of patients with idiopathic pancreatitis are high. Recurrent attacks of pancreatitis are common, but are likely to have reduced risk of death on subsequent admissions.

Using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Quantify Perfusion Quality in Kidney and Pancreas Grafts on Vascular Reperfusion: A Proof-of-Principle Study

The accuracy of intraoperative graft perfusion assessment still remains subjective, with doppler examination being the only objective adjunct. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) has been used to assess intraoperative blood flow in neurosurgery and in various surgical specialties. Despite its ability to accurately quantify perfusion at the microvascular level, it has not been clinically evaluated in kidney/kidney-pancreas transplantation for perfusion characterization. We aimed to evaluate the utility of LSCI and identify objective parameters that can be quantified at reperfusion.

Methods

This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04202237). The Moor FLPI-2 blood flow imager was used in 4 patients (1 Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney, 2 deceased, and 1 living donor kidney transplants) during reperfusion to capture reperfusion data. The following parameters were measured: flux (average speed × concentration of moving red blood cells in the sample volume), doppler centroid, total and valid pixels, valid rate, and total and valid area. Flux data were analyzed with Moor FLPI analysis software.

Results

The perfusion characteristics and flux images correlated with initial graft function.

Conclusions

LSCI is a safe, noncontact imaging modality that provides real-time, accurate, high-resolution, full field blood flow images and a wide range of flux data to objectively quantify organ reperfusion intraoperatively in kidney/kidney-pancreas transplantation. This modality could be used to develop a robust numerical quantification system for the evaluation and reporting of intraoperative organ perfusion, and aid intraoperative decision-making. Perfusion data could be combined with biomarkers and immunological parameters to more accurately predict graft outcomes.

Laterality in laparoscopic hand assisted donor nephrectomy - Does it matter anymore? Outcomes of a large retrospective series

This retrospective study was performed to analyse if laterality of the retrieved living donor kidney had any effect on donor and recipient outcomes after hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). 739 donors who underwent HALDN between January 2006 and January 2018 at a large tertiary transplant centre in the United Kingdom were included. Donor outcomes in individuals undergoing right versus left HALDN were compared with respect to conversion rates, morbidity, warm and cold ischaemia times and recipient failure rates, vascular and ureteric complications. 604 (81.7%) underwent left HALDN and 135 (18.3%) underwent right HALDN, mean age was 47.1 years and 46.8 years respectively with comparable gender distribution. The operative time was shorter for the left side (p = 0.003) and improved during the study for the left but not the right side. In recipients who received left kidneys there were more early technical failures observed (8 versus 1) though not statistically significant. Most centres prefer performing a left nephrectomy and recipient surgeons prefer a left kidney for transplantation primarily because of having a longer vein. This large study provides reassurance that right HALDN nephrectomy is a safe procedure with similar outcomes to left HALDN.

865 Reducing Delays in Cholecystectomy Surgery of Patients Admitted with Gallstone-Related Disease Within Gold Standard Time Frame Set Out By NICE

Introduction

As per NICE guidelines, Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC) aims for 80% of eligible patients with gallstone-related disease to receive their cholecystectomy within 8 days of presentation1. Only 63.6% of eligible patients at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT) had their surgery within the target time. This project was done to identify the reasons behind ELHT not achieving the set target and to implement changes to overcome this.

Method

This was a retrospective review of a prospectively collected data of 444 patients from the ELHT Chole-QuIC database (July 2019-November 2020). Data were analysed in three periods: initial period (July 2019-November 2019), pre-COVID-19 period (December 2019-February 2020), COVID-19 period (March 2020-November 2020). Time to surgery was established. If the 8-day target was not met, reasons behind the delay were recorded.

Results

During the first cycle, the main reasons delays included the patients being temporarily unfit (13.8%), insufficient theatre capacity (13.8%) and variations in treatment plans (11.32%). 8% of patients had re-admissions related to their gallstone disease. Changes were implemented forward included a clear local gallstone disease management pathway and CholeQuIC referral system, increasing theatre capacity, and allocating pre-operative assessment slots. Gold standard cholecystectomy target period improved from 63.6% to 67.4% within three months of changes. However, the figure drastically reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic (36.3%) as elective surgeries were temporarily suspended.

Conclusions

The implementation of a gallstone disease management pathway, a coordinated referral system and additional theatre capacity contributed to the increase in cholecystectomies that were performed within the 8-day national target period.

Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study

BACKGROUND

Timing and adequacy of peritoneal source control are the most important pillars in the management of patients with acute peritonitis. Therefore, early prognostic evaluation of acute peritonitis is paramount to assess the severity and establish a prompt and appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute peritonitis and to develop a warning score system, based on easily recognizable and assessable variables, globally accepted.

METHODS

This worldwide multicentre observational study included 153 surgical departments across 56 countries over a 4-month study period between February 1, 2018, and May 31, 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 3137 patients were included, with 1815 (57.9%) men and 1322 (42.1%) women, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 28-66). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.9%, with a median length of stay of 6 days (IQR 4-10). Using multivariable logistic regression, independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified: age > 80 years, malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease, severe chronic kidney disease, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, AVPU responsiveness scale (voice and unresponsive), blood oxygen saturation level (SpO₂) < 90% in air, platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3, and lactate > 4 mmol/l. These variables were used to create the PIPAS Severity Score, a bedside early warning score for patients with acute peritonitis. The overall mortality was 2.9% for patients who had scores of 0-1, 22.7% for those who had scores of 2-3, 46.8% for those who had scores of 4-5, and 86.7% for those who have scores of 7-8.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple PIPAS Severity Score can be used on a global level and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure and mortality.

Computerized axial manometry of the esophagus. A new method for the assessment of antireflux operations

This is a presentation of a new manometric parameter of the mechanical competence of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the lower esophageal sphincter vector volume (LESVV). It is determined by computer analysis of continuous-pressure measurements during constant speed pullback of a radially oriented 4- 6- or 8-channel manometry catheter across the LES. Patients were studied with this method both before aggressive medical therapy for esophagitis and before and after Nissen fundoplication. LESVV accurately predicted failure of medical therapy and success of the fundoplication. In patients with successful fundoplication, LESVV demonstrated a 100-fold increase in mechanical competence of the LES, even in the absence of increased LES pressure or length, increasing from 113 +/- 63 mm3 to 11357 +/- 3733 mm3.