1
|
Benhmida S, Sun R, Gherga E, Hammoud Y, Rouvier J, Mauvais O, Bockel S, Louvrier A, Lebbad A, Bontemps P, Ortholan C, Bourhis J, Lestrade L, Sun XS. Split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy for aged and frail patients with head and neck cancers. A retrospective study of 75 cases. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:812-819. [PMID: 33144061 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and the tolerance of a split course hypofractionated (SCH) radiotherapy (RT) protocol in head and neck cancer (HNC) for eldery and/or unfit patients (pts). PATIENTS AND METHODS Pts with HNC treated by SCH-RT in two institutions were included retrospectively. The main SCH RT regimen was two courses of 30 grays (Gy)/10 fractions separated by 2-4 weeks, without any systemic therapy. RESULTS Between February 2012 and January 2019, 75 consecutive patients were analyzed. The median age was 80 years (range: 45.7-98.2) and 53 (70.7%) were men. Sixty-one (81.3%) pts had stage III/IV disease and 54 (72%) had at least two comorbidities. All of them were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (range: 3.1-58.3). Local control at 12 and 24 months was 72.8% IC95%[62-85.5] and 51.7% IC95%[38.1-70.1] respectively. Progression free survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 months were 47.7% IC95%[37.4-60.8] and 41% IC95%[15-36.4] respectively, with a median of 11.5 months IC95%[8.9-17]. OS at 12 and 24 months were 60.4% IC95%[50-73.1] and 41% IC95%[30.6-54.9] respectively, with a median of 19.3 months IC95%[11.9-25.8]. Acute and late grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred for 6 (8%) and 3 (4%) pts. CONCLUSION The present SCH-RT regimen seems effective, well-tolerated and could represent an alternative to palliative strategies for pts deemed unfit for standard exclusive RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Benhmida
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France.
| | - R Sun
- Department of radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - E Gherga
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - Y Hammoud
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - J Rouvier
- Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - O Mauvais
- Department of head and neck surgery, CHU de Besançon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - S Bockel
- Department of radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - A Louvrier
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, CHU de Besançon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - A Lebbad
- Department of head and neck surgery, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, 100, route de Moval, Trevenans, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - C Ortholan
- Department of radiotherapy, Centre hospitalier Princesse-Grace, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| | - J Bourhis
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Service de Radio-oncologie, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - L Lestrade
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - X S Sun
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Debelmas A, Lanciaux S, Bontemps P, Khonsari RH. A sore throat. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 121:454-456. [PMID: 31476541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The authors report an unusual case of penetrating anterior neck injury in a 71-year-old female patient, who intentionally stabbed herself in a suicide attempt. The initial clinical and radiological assessment revealed that the knife had pierced through the sixth vertebral body and spinal cord, avoiding all the vital structures on the way. Surgical removal of the knife was successfully performed, and the patient was rapidly discharged, with mild neurological impairment. Although frequently described in posterior locations, neurological lesions are rare in anterior neck injuries. This case emphasizes the fact that a thorough neurological examination should be conducted in all neck injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Debelmas
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne universités, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83, boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - S Lanciaux
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne universités, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83, boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie, université Sorbonne Paris Cité, université Paris Diderot, hôpital Beaujon, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, 92110 Paris, France
| | - R H Khonsari
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et plastique, université Paris Descartes, université Sorbonne Paris Cité, centre de référence des fentes et malformations faciales (MAFACE), Hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bourgier C, Cowen D, Lemanski C, Castan F, Rivera S, De La Lande B, Peignaux K, Le Blanc-Onfroy M, Benyoucef A, Mege A, Douadi-Gaci Z, Racadot S, Latorzeff I, Schick U, Jacquot S, Massabeau C, Guilbert P, Geffrelot J, Ellis S, Lecouillard I, Breton-Callu C, Richard-Tallet A, Bontemps P, Fenoglietto P, Azria D. OC-0594 Acute toxicity results after breast-conserving therapy in “boost vs no boost (BONBIS)” DCIS trial. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)31014-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Clément-Zhao A, Tanguy ML, Cottu P, De La Lande B, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, Baumann P, Levy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Gobillion A, Kirova Y. Abstract P3-12-06: TOxicities of Locoregional Radiotherapy Associated with Bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (TOLERAB): Final long-term evaluation. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-12-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Recent phase 3 clinical trials have evaluated the addition of bevacizumab (B) to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. But few data are available about the tolerance of B with locoregional radiation therapy (RT). The objective was to evaluate the 5 years late toxicities of the concurrent B and RT in non-metastatic breast cancer.
Material and methods: This is a multicenter prospective study including non-metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in phase 3 clinical trials evaluating B with concurrent RT (BEATRICE, BETH, BEVERLY 1, BERVERLY 2) versus RT alone. All patients received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and normo-fractionated breast or chest wall RT, with or without regional lymph nodes RT. B was administrated as an equivalent of 5 mg/kg every week for 1 year. The safety profile (using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0) was evaluated at 1, 3 and 5 years after the completion of radiotherapy.
Results: From October 2007 to January 2012, 151 patients totally included. Median follow-up was 60 months (36-84) and 5 years late toxicities were available for 104 patients (46 with B and RT, 58 with RT alone). Median age was 51 (22-81). 61% of patients received regional lymph nodes RT. The majority of tumor was triple negative (65.6%), tumor size <2cm (50%) and nodal status negative (63.8%). Median total dose of B was 15000 mg (13200 – 18550) and median duration was 11.2 months (11-12.6). No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. Only 16 patients had grade 1-2 toxicities (8 treated with B and RT, 8 with RT alone): n=4 (3.8%) had grade 1 pain, n=5 (4.8%) had grade 1-2 fibrosis, n=1 (1%) had grade 2 telangiectasia and n=5 (4.8%) had grade 1-2 lymphoedema. No significant difference between the 2 arms was observed. One patient of 46 evaluated had Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction inferior to 50%. At 5 years, overall survival was 93.8%, disease free-survival 89% and locoregional free-survival 93.1 %.
Conclusion: Concurrent B and locoregional RT provides acceptable 5-years toxicities in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed.
Citation Format: Clément-Zhao A, Tanguy M-L, Cottu P, De La Lande B, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, Baumann P, Levy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Gobillion A, Kirova Y. TOxicities of Locoregional Radiotherapy Associated with Bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (TOLERAB): Final long-term evaluation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Clément-Zhao
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - M-L Tanguy
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - P Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - B De La Lande
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - P Baumann
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - C Levy
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - K Peignaux
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - A Reynaud-Bougnoux
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - A Gobillion
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; CHU Tours, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benhmida S, Sun R, Gherga E, Hammoud Y, Lestrade L, Boulbair F, Mauvais O, Bontemps P, Thariat J, Bourhis J, Sun X. Radiothérapie hypofractionnée en split course de patients âgés et fragiles atteints d’un cancer de la tête et du cou localement évolué : étude de 58 cas. Cancer Radiother 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.07.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
6
|
Dautruche A, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, de la Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Lévy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Pernin V, Kirova Y. Evaluation at 3 years of concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy for breast cancer: Results of a prospective study. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:222-228. [PMID: 29650388 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the 3 years late toxicity among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who received concurrent bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant concomitant association of bevacizumab and radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Toxicity was assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 during the radiotherapy and follow-up clinics at 12 and 36 months after its completion. The study was designed to evaluate the toxicity at one year, 3 years and 5 years. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were included from October 2007 to August 2010. All of them received concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and bevacizumab (in 24 cases after primary systemic treatment). All patients received non-fractionated radiotherapy to breast or chest wall with or without irradiation of regional lymph nodes. Early toxicity has been previously reported. Median follow-up was 46.4 months (range: 18-77 months). Median age was 53 years old (range: 23-68 years). The 3-years overall survival was 93% (range: 87-100%). Evaluation of the toxicity at 3 years was available for 67% of the patients. There was a low rate of toxicity: 14% grade 1 pain, 9% grade 1 fibrosis, 2% grade 1 telangiectasia, 2% grade 1 paresis, 7% grade 1 lymphedema and 2% grade 3 lymphedema. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. No patient had a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional radiotherapy is associated with acceptable 3-years toxicity in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dautruche
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - L Belin
- Biostatistics department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Cottu
- Oncology department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Radiotherapy department, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Radiotherapy department, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - B de la Lande
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, René-Huguenin hospital, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - P Baumann
- Radiotherapy department, centre d'oncologie de Gentilly, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - F Missohou
- Radiotherapy department, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - C Lévy
- Radiotherapy department, centre François-Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K Peignaux
- Radiotherapy department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 21079 Dijon, France
| | | | - F Denis
- Radiotherapy department, centre Jean-Bernard, 72000 Le Mans, France
| | - A Gobillion
- Biostatistics department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - V Pernin
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Caubet M, Bontemps P, Anota A, Boulbair F, Hammoud Y, Peigneaux K, Créhange G, De Bari B. EP-1335: Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated loco-regional radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)31645-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
8
|
Loncle T, Bontemps P, Bénaicha M. Modified technique used for sagittal splitting of the mandible. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 118:193-196. [PMID: 28391077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2017.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Sagittal osteotomy of the mandible is the most common orthognathic surgery procedure. The drawbacks of this technique are: nerve disturbance, the common formations of a pre-angular notch after mandibular advancement, and the impossibility of lowering the mandibular angle bicortically. The goal of the described technique is to maintain the basal mandibular edge and the internal valve in one single piece. This split prevents unsightly notches appearing after mandibular advancement and it moves down the mandibular angle during counterclockwise rotation and does not increase the intergonial distance. It is especially indicated for skeletal class II cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Loncle
- Clinique Hartmann, 26, Boulevard Victor Hugo, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
| | - P Bontemps
- Clinique Hartmann, 26, Boulevard Victor Hugo, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - M Bénaicha
- Clinique Hartmann, 26, Boulevard Victor Hugo, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dautruche A, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, De La Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Levy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Ady Vago N, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Abstract P1-10-17: Radiotherapy associated with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-10-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives
The purpose of this study was to determine early and late toxicities among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) receiving concurrent bevacizumab (BV) and radiation therapy (RT).
Materials/Methods
Multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant concomitant association of BV and RT in patients with non-metastatic BC enrolled in Phase 3 BEATRICE, BEVERLY and BETH trial. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0 during RT, 12 months and 36 months after its completion.
Results
Sixty-four patients were included from october 2007 to august 2010. They all received adjuvant RT and BV concomitant treatment, plus neo-adjuvant BV for 24 patients. RT was adjuvant and normo-fractionated. Twelve months toxicity was available for 60 patients and 36 months toxicity was available for 43 patients. Median follow-up was 46 months (18-77). Median age was 51 years old (23-68). Among 63 evaluated patients during RT, acute radiation dermatitis was observed in 48 (76%) patients : Grade 1 for 27 (43%), grade 2 for 17 (27%), grade 3 for 4 patients (6%). Grade 2 acute oesophagitis was observed in 1 patient. At 3 years, few toxicities were observed : 6 patients (14%) had grade 1 pain, 4 (9%) had grade 1 fibrosis, one (2%) had grade 1 telangiectasis, one (2%) had grade 1 paresis, 3 (7%) had grade 1 lymphoedema and one grade 3 lymphoedema. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. At 12 months, only one evaluated patient had a LVEF <50% and none at 36 months.
Conclusions
Concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional RT is associated with acceptable early and late 3-years toxicities in patients with BC. Determination of late toxicity at 60 months is currently underway.
Citation Format: Dautruche A, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, De La Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Levy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Ady Vago N, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Radiotherapy associated with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dautruche
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - L Belin
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - P Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - P Bontemps
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - C Lemanski
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - B De La Lande
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - P Baumann
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - F Missohou
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - C Levy
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - K Peignaux
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - A Reynaud-Bougnoux
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - F Denis
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - A Gobillion
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - N Ady Vago
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - A Fourquet
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| | - Y Kirova
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, Doubs, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, Hérault, France; Institut Curie, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, Hauts-de-Seine, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, Calvados, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Côte-d'Or, France; CHU Tours, Tours, Indre-et-Loire; Centre Jean Bernard, le Mans, Sarthe, France; Roche SAS, Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pernin V, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, De La Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Levy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Bollet M, Vago NA, Dendale R, Campana F, Fourquet A, Kirova YM. Late toxicities and outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy combined with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative non-metastatic breast cancer. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20140800. [PMID: 25645108 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of the concurrent combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant radiotherapy (B-RT) in breast cancer (BC). METHODS Multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) alone or B-RT in patients with non-metastatic BC enrolled in randomized Phase 3 BEATRICE trial. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0 during and 12 months after the completion of RT. RESULTS From 2007 to 2012, 39 females received adjuvant B-RT and 45 received adjuvant RT alone. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. All patients had triple-negative non-metastatic BC and received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by RT. 90% of the 39 females treated by concurrent B-RT received whole breast irradiation (WBI) with a boost and 4 (10%) received post-mastectomy RT. Lymph node RT was delivered in 49% of the females with internal mammary chain irradiation. The mean duration of bevacizumab was 11.7 months. 38 (84%) females treated by RT alone received WBI with a boost and 16% of the females received post-mastectomy RT. Lymph node RT was delivered in 47% of the females with internal mammary chain RT in 31%. Grade 3 acute dermatitis was observed in 9% of patients receiving B-RT and 5% of patients receiving RT alone with no significant difference. 1 year after the completion of RT, the most common late grade 1-2 toxicities in the B-RT group were pain (18%), fibrosis (8%) and telangiectasia (5%). CONCLUSION The concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional RT is associated with acceptable early and late 1-year toxicities in patients with BC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The largest series of this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Pernin
- 1 Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cerda T, Lescut N, Servagi-Vernat S, Bosset J, Bontemps P. Récidive locale après traitement conservateur par chirurgie et irradiation pour cancer du sein : faisabilité d’une réirradiation selon les critères histopronostiques. Cancer Radiother 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.07.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Desmoplastic fibroma is a benign and rare intraosseous tumor. This lesion is locally aggressive and has a high tendency to recur. OBSERVATION The authors report the diagnostic and therapeutic management of a 26-year-old female patient who presented with a desmoplastic fibroma of the zygoma. DISCUSSION This localization is extremely rare and only 2 cases have been reported. The clinical and radiological signs are pauci-specific. The diagnosis is most often established according to anatomopathology and immunohistochemistry results. The recommended management is extensive surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Bontemps
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et chirurgie plastique, hôpital central de Nancy, France.
| | - M Brix
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et chirurgie plastique, hôpital central de Nancy, France
| | - E Simon
- Service de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et chirurgie plastique, hôpital central de Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pernin VE, Belin L, Gobillion A, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, De La Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Levy C, Bougnoux P, Peignaux K, Denis F, Kirova Y. Abstract P5-14-11: Locoregional toxicities after adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p5-14-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives
Few data are available regarding the safety of the concurrent combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer, especially in terms of late toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine early and late loco-regional toxicities among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with this combination.
Materials/Methods
In our prospective and descriptive study, we analyzed loco-regional toxicities of adjuvant RT in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving either concurrent bevacizumab or not in the randomized trial BEATRICE. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v3.0). Evaluation was done during RT and 12 months after the end of RT. All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze toxicity between the two groups.
Results
From September 2007 to July 2009, we included 84 patients from the randomized trial BEATRICE which evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of bevacizumab to standard adjuvant therapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer; 39 women received an adjuvant RT with concurrent bevacizumab and 45 women received an adjuvant RT alone. Evaluation at 12 months was available for all the patients. All patients had a triple negative non-metastatic breast cancer and had an adjuvant chemotherapy then RT. Among patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab with RT, a total of 35 patients (90%) achieved a whole breast irradiation (median dose: 50 Gy) with a boost in the surgical bed (median dose: 16 Gy) and 4 patients (10%) had a post mastectomy RT (median dose 50 Gy); lymph node RT was performed in 19 patients (49%) with internal mammary chain RT in 12 patients (31%). Mean time of bevacizumab treatment was 11.7 months [2.1-12.6] and mean total dose of bevacizumab was 15000 mg [3330-28080]. Among patients receiving RT alone, 38 patients (84%) achieved a whole breast irradiation (median dose: 50 Gy) with a boost in the surgical bed (median dose: 16 Gy) and 7 patients (16%) had a post mastectomy RT (median dose 50 Gy); lymph node RT was performed in 21 patients (47%) with internal mammary chain RT in 14 patients (31%). Radiation treatment parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Incidence of acute grade 3 dermatitis was 10% in patients receiving bevacizumab associated with RT and 6% in patients receiving RT alone without significant difference. One year after the end of RT, the most common late toxicities in the group receiving bevacizumab and RT were grade 1-2 pain (18%), grade 1-2 fibrosis (8%), grade 1-2 arm lymphedema (8%) and grade 1-2 telangiectasia (6%).There was no significant difference in pain, radiation fibrosis, telangiectasia, arm lymphedema and dyspnea between the two groups. No patient experienced grade 3-4 toxicity in the two groups.
Conclusions
Our results indicate that concurrent bevacizumab with loco-regional RT provide acceptable early and late toxicities after one year in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-14-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V-E Pernin
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - L Belin
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - A Gobillion
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - P Cottu
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - B De La Lande
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - P Baumann
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - F Missohou
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - C Levy
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - P Bougnoux
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - K Peignaux
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - F Denis
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Institut Curie, Hospital, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Clinical Research, Paris, France; CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Hospital, Saint Cloud, France; Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; CHRU de Tours, Tours, France; Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Clinique Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pernin V, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, De La Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Levy C, Kirova Y. Early and Late Toxicity of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Associated With Concurrent Bevacizumab in Patients With Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
15
|
Stork H, Bontemps P, Rikken GLJA. NMR in pulsed high-field magnets and application to high-T(C) superconductors. J Magn Reson 2013; 234:30-34. [PMID: 23835573 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2013] [Revised: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
This article deals with the implementation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) experiments in pulsed magnetic fields at the pulsed-field facility of the Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses and its application to the high-T(C) superconductor YBa2Cu3O6.51. The experimental setup is described in detail, including a low-temperature probe head adapted for pulsed fields. An entire paragraph is dedicated to the discussion of NMR in pulsed field and the introduction of an advanced deconvolution technique making use of the induction voltage in an additional pick-up coil. The (63)Cu/(65)Cu NMR experiments on an YBa2Cu3O6.51 single crystal were performed at 2.5K during a field pulse of 46.8-T-amplitude. In the recorded spectrum the (63)Cu center line and high-frequency satellites as well as the (65)Cu center line are identified and are compared with results in literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Stork
- Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses, 143 Avenue de Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schwarzer A, Bontemps P, Urruzuno P, Kalach N, Awanczak B, Koletzko S. Efficacité du traitement séquentiel chez l’enfant pour l’éradication d’Helicobacter pylori. Arch Pediatr 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
17
|
Kotilea K, Bontemps P, Malher T, Salamé A, Cadranel S, Scaillon M. L’hématome duodénal, complication rare des endoscopies digestives. Arch Pediatr 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
18
|
|
19
|
Abou-Hamad E, Bontemps P, Rikken GLJA. NMR in pulsed magnetic field. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 2011; 40:42-44. [PMID: 21798722 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2011.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/25/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments in pulsed magnetic fields up to 30.4 T focused on (1)H and (93)Nb nuclei are reported. Here we discuss the advantage and limitation of pulsed field NMR and why this technique is able to become a promising research tool.
Collapse
|
20
|
Azria D, Cowen D, Bourgier C, de la Lande B, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Douadi Gaci Z, Leblanc-Onfroy M, Latorzeff I, Pradier O, Maingon P, Lecouillard I, Bontemps P, Ellis S, Levy C, Benyoucef A, Racadot S, Laharie-Mineur H, Lagarde P, Marchal C, Lemanski C. Phase III randomized French multicentric study to evaluate the impact of a localized 16-Gy boost after conservative surgery and a 50-Gy whole-breast irradiation in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (the BONBIS trial). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.tps131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
21
|
Vernat SS, Pozet A, Bontemps P, Mercier M, Bosset JF. Étude rétrospective depatients traités pouruncarcinome descordes vocales parirradiation exclusive. Cancer Radiother 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2007.09.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
22
|
Cadranel S, Bontemps P, Van Biervliet S, Alliet P, Lauvau D, Vandenhoven G, Vandenplas Y. Improvement of the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in children is by adjunction of omeprazole to a dual antibiotherapy. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96:82-6. [PMID: 17187610 DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00011.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM The possible improvement of efficacy and tolerability of a 7-day dual antibiotherapy amoxicillin-clarithromycin (AC) on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastritis in children by the adjunction of omeprazole (OAC) was studied. METHODS Forty-six children presenting with H. pylori gastritis, assessed at inclusion by endoscopy, H. pylori urease test, histology and/or culture were randomised to a twice-daily regimen of AC or OAC. A (13)C-urease breath test was performed 4-6 weeks after the end of the treatment period to evaluate H. pylori eradication. RESULTS A larger proportion of patients was H. pylori negative (69%) in the OAC regimen treatment 4-6 weeks after eradication treatment compared with those who received dual AC therapy (15%). A total of seven patients (three in the OAC and four in the AC group) reported adverse events (AEs). Only vomiting was reported in more than one patient (one in each treatment regimen) and only one AE was severe (urticaria: in the OAC group, but considered not related to treatment). CONCLUSION A larger eradication rate of H. pylori was obtained in the triple OAC group than in the dual AC group. Both therapy regimens can be safely administered to children for 7 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cadranel
- Queen Fabiola Children's Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Servagi-Vernat S, Créhange G, Lorchel F, Bontemps P, Bosset JF. [Second malignancies after radiotherapy for testicular seminoma: 2 cases]. Cancer Radiother 2006; 10:145-7. [PMID: 16517197 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2006.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2005] [Revised: 01/05/2006] [Accepted: 01/17/2006] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Orchiectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy of retroperitoneal paraaortic and ipsilateral iliac nodes is the standard treatment for localized testicular seminoma (I, IIA, IIB). Post therapeutic follow-up allows to detect local relapse and radio-induced second cancer. Nevertheless, evaluation of risk of second malignancy still remains difficult. We report 2 cases of rectal cancer after radiotherapy for testicular seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Servagi-Vernat
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Jean-Minjoz, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Genet D, Cupissol D, Calais G, Bontemps P, Bourgeois H, Dutin JP, Philippi MH, Bendahmane B, Mallard-Carre M, Tubiana-Mathieu N. Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil in Locally Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Am J Clin Oncol 2004; 27:472-6. [PMID: 15596913 DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000136017.13633.b0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This phase II study evaluated docetaxel-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts--those previously treated with chemotherapy and those nonpretreated--that received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (day 1) plus 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day (days 1-5 every 3 weeks). Of 63 patients entered, 20 (31.7%) were pretreated and 43 (68.3%) were nonpretreated. Fifty-nine patients (93.7%) had received prior radiotherapy. After inclusion of 20 patients, the 5-FU dose was reduced to 750 mg/m2/day due to unacceptable toxicity. The overall response rate (ORR) was 20.6% on radiologic review (22.2%, investigator assessment). Pretreated patients achieved an ORR of 25.0% versus 18.6% for nonpretreated patients. This unexpected finding was partly attributed to differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Overall major grade 3 to 4 toxicities comprised neutropenia (66.6%), febrile neutropenia (31.7%), and mucositis (31.7%). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were lower at the reduced 5-FU dose (750 mg/m2/day): Febrile neutropenia declined from 40.0% to 27.9%; mucositis declined from 55.0% to 20.9%. Three treatment-related deaths occurred (2 with 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day, 1 with 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day). Docetaxel-5-FU appears active in locally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN with acceptable toxicity at the dose of 5-FU 750 mg/m2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Genet
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chaigneau L, Nguyen T, Stein U, Guardiola E, Danzon A, Bontemps P, Pivot X. 140 Prognostic factors of overall survival for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer: a retrospective study. EJC Suppl 2003. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(03)90173-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
26
|
Tubiana-Mathieu N, Cupissol D, Calais G, Bontemps P, Bourgeois H, Dutin J, Filippi M, Saliba E, Assadourian S. Clinical results of docetaxel (D) and 5 fluorouracile (5FU) in metastatic/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Eur J Cancer 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)81032-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
27
|
Ozsahin M, Zouhair A, Villà S, Storme G, Chauvet B, Taussky D, Gouders D, Ries G, Bontemps P, Coucke PA, Mirimanoff RO. Prognostic factors in urothelial renal pelvis and ureter tumours: a multicentre Rare Cancer Network study. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35:738-43. [PMID: 10505034 DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00012-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
To assess the prognostic factors in patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and/or ureter, a series of 138 patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and/or ureter was collected in a retrospective multicentre study. 12 patients with distant metastases were excluded from the statistical evaluation. All but 3 patients underwent radical surgery: nephroureterectomy (n = 71), nephroureterectomy and lymphadenectomy (n = 20), nephroureterectomy and partial bladder resection or transurethral resection (n = 20), nephrectomy (n = 10), and ureterectomy (n = 5). Sixty-one per cent (n = 77) of the tumours were located in the renal pelvis, and 21% (n = 27) in the ureter (both in 22 [17%]). Following surgery, residual tumour was still present in 33 patients (16 microscopic and 17 macroscopic). Postoperative radiotherapy was given to 45 (36%) patients. The median follow-up period was 39 months. In a median period of 9 months, 66% of the patients relapsed (34 local, 7 locoregional, 16 regional, and 24 distant). The 5- and 10-year survival were 29% and 19%, respectively, in all patients. In univariate analyses, statistically significant factors influencing the outcome were Karnofsky index, pT-classification, pN-classification, tumour localisation, grade, and residual tumour after surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent prognostic factors influencing outcome were pT-classification, the existence of residual tumour, and tumour localisation. In patients with urothelial renal pelvis and/or ureter tumours, a radical surgical attitude is mandatory; and the presence of tumour in the ureter is associated with a poorer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Late rectal morbidity has been observed in 2%-25% of patients treated with radiotherapy using curative doses for prostate, cervix and rectal cancers. The major encountered clinical pictures are rectal proctitis, rectal/anal strictures, rectal bleeding, ulcers and fistula. Some may alter the patient's lifestyle while other may induce death. Recommendations concerning the clinical practice are described. The treatment of these late rectal effects include nutritional recommendations, laser, formalin application, and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Bosset
- Service de radiothérapie-oncologie, CHU Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Horiot JC, Bontemps P, van der Bogaert W, Le Fur R, van der Weijngaert D, Bolla M, Bernier J, Lusinchi A, Stuschke M, Lopez-Torrecilla J, Begg AC, Pierart M, Collete L. Accelerated fractionation compared ta conventional fractionation improves loco-regional control in the radiotherapy of advanced head and neck cancers: results of EORTC 22851 randomized trial. Cancer Radiother 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s1278-3218(98)89071-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
30
|
Horiot J, Bontemps P, Begg A, Le Fur R, van den Bogaert W, Bolla M, Nguyen T, van den Weijngaert D, Bemier J, Lusinchi A, Stuschke M, Lopez-Torrecilia D, Jancar B, Collette L, Van Glabbeke M, Pierart M. New radiotherapy fractionation schemes in head and neck cancers. The EORTC trials: A benchmark. Eur J Cancer 1997. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)85138-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
31
|
Horiot JC, Bontemps P, van den Bogaert W, Le Fur R, van den Weijngaert D, Bolla M, Bernier J, Lusinchi A, Stuschke M, Lopez-Torrecilla J, Begg AC, Pierart M, Collette L. Accelerated fractionation (AF) compared to conventional fractionation (CF) improves loco-regional control in the radiotherapy of advanced head and neck cancers: results of the EORTC 22851 randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 1997; 44:111-21. [PMID: 9288839 DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00079-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 394] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A 5 week-hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy regimen without reduction of the total dose was developed to fight tumour repopulation during treatment and tumour hypoxia. The purpose of the study was to try to improve loco-regional control in high risk head and neck carcinoma treated with curative radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1985 to 1995, a randomised controlled trial of the EORTC Cooperative Group of Radiotherapy (EORTC 22851) compared the experimental regimen (72 Gy/45 fractions/5 weeks) to standard fractionation and overall treatment time (70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks) in T2, T3 and T4 head and neck cancers (hypopharynx excluded). The end-point criteria were local and loco-regional control, overall and disease-free survival, and acute and late toxicities. Five hundred twelve patients were accrued. RESULTS Patients in the AF (accelerated fractionation) arm did significantly better with regard to loco-regional control (P = 0.02) resulting at 5 years in a 13% gain (95% CI 3-23% gain) in loco-regional control over the CF (conventional fractionation) arm. This improvement is of larger magnitude in patients with poorer prognosis (N2-3 any T, T4 any N) than in patients with more favourable stage. Multivariate analysis confirmed AF as an independent prognostic factor of good prognosis for loco-regional control (P = 0.03). Specific survival shows a trend (P = 0.06) in favour of the AF arm. ACUTE AND LATE TOXICITIES: Acute and late toxicity were increased in the AF arm. Late severe functional irradiation damage occurred in 14% of patients of the AF arm versus 4% in the CF arm. Two cases of radiation-induced myelitis occurred after doses of 42 and 48 Gy to the spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS This trial shows that accelerated radiotherapy improves loco-regional control in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. A less toxic scheme should, however, be investigated and documented before using accelerated radiotherapy as a standard regimen of curative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Horiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tumour Institute Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ozsahin M, Zouhair A, Villà S, Storme G, Chauvet B, Taussky D, van Houtte P, Ries G, Bontemps P, Coucke P, Mirimanoff R. 2099 Prognostic factors in urothelial renal pelvis and ureter tumors: A multicenter Rare Cancer Network study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997. [DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)80867-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
33
|
Horiot JC, Bontemps P, Begg AC, Le Fur R, Van den Bogaert W, Bolla M, N'Guyen T, Van den Weijngaert D, Bernier J, Lusinchi A, Stuschke D, Lopez Torrecilla D, Jancar B, Collette L, Van Glabbeke M, Pierart M. [Hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancers: results of the EORTC trials and impact on clinical practice]. Bull Cancer Radiother 1996; 83:314-20. [PMID: 9081333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J C Horiot
- Centre Georges-François-Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Horiot J, Bontemps P, Le Fur R, van den Bogaert W, Bolla M, van Weijngaert D, Bernier J, Lusinchi A, Stuschke M, Lopez Torrecilla D, Collette L, Pierart M. 106An overview of the EORTC accelerated and hyperfractionated radiotherapy trials in head & neck cancers. Radiother Oncol 1996. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)80115-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
35
|
Andre K, Schraub S, Mercier M, Bontemps P. Role of alcohol and tobacco in the aetiology of head and neck cancer: a case-control study in the Doubs region of France. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1995; 31B:301-9. [PMID: 8704646 DOI: 10.1016/0964-1955(95)00041-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
A case-control study conducted from 1986 to 1989 using the Doubs Cancer Registry included 299 cases of head and neck cancer and 645 controls from the general population. The results provide an indicator of the respective roles of alcohol and tobacco in all these cancers and on the tumour site. The people who smoked more than one packet of cigarettes a day have a risk that is 13 times higher than that of non-smokers and those who drink more than one and a half litres of wine per day have a risk that is 34 times higher of developing head and neck cancer. The combined exposure of alcohol and tobacco is characterised by a high risk and can be described by a multiplicative model without interaction. The age at onset (below 18 years of age) and the duration of smoking (over 35 years) are high risk factors. The risk decreases after stopping smoking, but only casual smokers (less than 7 cigarettes per day) can hope to have the same risk as non-smokers within a period of 15 years. Subjects smoking only non-filter cigarettes have a higher risk (OR = 1.98) than those who smoke filter cigarettes. The same applies to those who roll their own cigarettes (OR = 1.93) or inhale the smoke (OR = 1.51).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Andre
- Registre des Tumeurs du Doubs, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besancon, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schraub S, Bontemps P, Mercier M, Barthod L, Fournier J. [Surveillance and rehabilitation of cancers of upper respiratory and digestive tracts]. Rev Prat 1995; 45:861-4. [PMID: 7761755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Follow-up of head and neck cancers after treatment is usually done by specialists every 2 to 3 month during an indeterminate period. The aim of this follow up is to detect a recurrence or a complication due to the treatment. Xerostomia, endolaryngeal and cutaneous modifications are the most frequent sequelae of irradiation. Major surgery of the larynx require a speech rehabilitation which gives correct results in 70% of the cases. Professional rehabilitation is possible for few patients: only 50% of the patients who had jobs before treatment were able to go back to work. The return to work was more often seen among civil servants, and workers than among craftsmen. Laryngectomised people resume their work less often than other head and neck cancer patients. There is no problem with social rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Schraub
- Service de radiothérapie et oncologie, Centre hospitalier Jean-Minjoz, Besançon
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Begg AC, Hofland I, Moonen L, Bartelink H, Schraub S, Bontemps P, Le Fur R, Van Den Bogaert W, Caspers R, Van Glabbeke M. The predictive value of cell kinetic measurements in a European trial of accelerated fractionation in advanced head and neck tumors: an interim report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 19:1449-53. [PMID: 2262369 DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90357-p] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The value of cell kinetic measurements in head and neck tumors in predicting which patients will benefit from accelerated fractionation radiotherapy regimens is being tested in a multicenter European trial (EORTC trial 22851). This paper reports on the first analysis of the correlation of kinetics with outcome in this trial. A proportion of patients in both the accelerated arm (72 Gy in 5 weeks, 1.6Gy per fraction, 45 fractions) and the conventional arm (70-72 Gy in 7-8 weeks, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction, 35-40 fractions) were given an i.v. injection of 100 mg/m2 IUdR (iododeoxyuridine) before treatment, and a tumor biopsy was taken several hours later. The potential doubling time of the tumor (Tpot) was obtained from a flow cytometric analysis of tumor cell nuclei using an anti-IUdR antibody. From a total of 260 patients entered in the trial, 53 have undergone kinetic analysis. Adequate IUdR labeling was seen in 47 patients (88.7%), from which the mean value for Tpot was found to be 4.5 +/- 2.5 days (+/- S.D.). Of the IUdR labeled patients, 30 have now been followed up for at least 1 year, 17 with conventional and 13 with accelerated radiotherapy. These patients were split into those with fast and those with slowly growing tumors, the dividing line being the median Tpot value of 4.6 days. After conventional 7-week radiotherapy, 2 of 6 patients with "fast" growing tumors obtained local control compared with 8 of 11 with "slow" growing tumors. A small difference in local control was seen been fast and slow tumors in the accelerated arm (5/9 vs. 3/4). These preliminary data support the hypothesis that patients with fast growing tumors do poorly with conventional radiotherapy and that pretreatment kinetic measurements can select patients at risk. The predictive power of the method must await the final analysis of trial results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Begg
- Department of Experimental Therapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Claudel-Bonvoisin S, Morgon A, Bontemps P, Moulinier B, Pansu M. Nouveau protocole thérapeutique pour prévenir les sténoses caustiques œsophagiennes: intérêt d'une sonde de calibrage en silastic. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1982. [DOI: 10.1007/bf02974687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|