1
|
De Angelis C, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Anello P, Quattrini M, Santavenere F, Soriani A, Sanguineti G, Pimpinella M, De Coste V, Arrichiello C, Ametrano G, Muto P, Bresciani S, Miranti A, Strigari L, Strolin S, Morganti A. Setting up an Italian end-to-end dosimetric audit for IMRT and VMAT: the experience of the OPRORA project. Phys Med 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)00508-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
2
|
Harrison RM, Ainsbury E, Alves J, Bottollier-Depois JF, Breustedt B, Caresana M, Clairand I, Fantuzzi E, Fattibene P, Gilvin P, Hupe O, Knežević Ž, Lopez MA, Olko P, Olšovcová V, Rabus H, Rühm W, Silari M, Stolarczyk L, Tanner R, Vanhavere F, Vargas A, Woda C. EURADOS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA 2020: VISION FOR THE DOSIMETRY OF IONISING RADIATION. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2021; 194:42-56. [PMID: 33989429 PMCID: PMC8165425 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Since 2012, the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has developed its Strategic Research Agenda (SRA), which contributes to the identification of future research needs in radiation dosimetry in Europe. Continued scientific developments in this field necessitate regular updates and, consequently, this paper summarises the latest revision of the SRA, with input regarding the state of the art and vision for the future contributed by EURADOS Working Groups and through a stakeholder workshop. Five visions define key issues in dosimetry research that are considered important over at least the next decade. They include scientific objectives and developments in (i) updated fundamental dose concepts and quantities, (ii) improved radiation risk estimates deduced from epidemiological cohorts, (iii) efficient dose assessment for radiological emergencies, (iv) integrated personalised dosimetry in medical applications and (v) improved radiation protection of workers and the public. This SRA will be used as a guideline for future activities of EURADOS Working Groups but can also be used as guidance for research in radiation dosimetry by the wider community. It will also be used as input for a general European research roadmap for radiation protection, following similar previous contributions to the European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research, under the Horizon 2020 programme (CONCERT). The full version of the SRA is available as a EURADOS report (www.eurados.org).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - E Ainsbury
- Public Health England, Chilton, Didcot, UK
| | - J Alves
- Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), CTN, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - J-F Bottollier-Depois
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - B Breustedt
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - I Clairand
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - E Fantuzzi
- ENEA - Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy
| | - P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy
| | - P Gilvin
- Public Health England, Chilton, Didcot, UK
| | - O Hupe
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany
| | - Ž Knežević
- Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI), Zagreb, Croatia
| | - M A Lopez
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - P Olko
- Instytut Fizyki Jądrowej Polskiej Akademii Nauk (IFJ PAN), Kraków, Poland
| | - V Olšovcová
- ELI Beamlines, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - H Rabus
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany
| | - W Rühm
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - M Silari
- CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
| | - L Stolarczyk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
- Instytut Fizyki Jądrowej Polskiej Akademii Nauk (IFJ PAN), Kraków, Poland
| | - R Tanner
- Public Health England, Chilton, Didcot, UK
| | - F Vanhavere
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - A Vargas
- Institute of Energy Technologies, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giussani A, Lopez MA, Romm H, Testa A, Ainsbury EA, Degteva M, Della Monaca S, Etherington G, Fattibene P, Güclu I, Jaworska A, Lloyd DC, Malátová I, McComish S, Melo D, Osko J, Rojo A, Roch-Lefevre S, Roy L, Shishkina E, Sotnik N, Tolmachev SY, Wieser A, Woda C, Youngman M. Eurados review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for internal exposures to ionising radiation and their applications. Radiat Environ Biophys 2020; 59:357-387. [PMID: 32372284 PMCID: PMC7369133 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-020-00845-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
This work presents an overview of the applications of retrospective dosimetry techniques in case of incorporation of radionuclides. The fact that internal exposures are characterized by a spatially inhomogeneous irradiation of the body, which is potentially prolonged over large periods and variable over time, is particularly problematic for biological and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry methods when compared with external exposures. The paper gives initially specific information about internal dosimetry methods, the most common cytogenetic techniques used in biological dosimetry and EPR dosimetry applied to tooth enamel. Based on real-case scenarios, dose estimates obtained from bioassay data as well as with biological and/or EPR dosimetry are compared and critically discussed. In most of the scenarios presented, concomitant external exposures were responsible for the greater portion of the received dose. As no assay is available which can discriminate between radiation of different types and different LETs on the basis of the type of damage induced, it is not possible to infer from these studies specific conclusions valid for incorporated radionuclides alone. The biological dosimetry assays and EPR techniques proved to be most applicable in cases when the radionuclides are almost homogeneously distributed in the body. No compelling evidence was obtained in other cases of extremely inhomogeneous distribution. Retrospective dosimetry needs to be optimized and further developed in order to be able to deal with real exposure cases, where a mixture of both external and internal exposures will be encountered most of the times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Giussani
- BfS-Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
| | - M A Lopez
- CIEMAT - Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Av.da Complutense 40, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Romm
- BfS-Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - A Testa
- ENEA Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123, Rome, Italy
| | - E A Ainsbury
- Public Health England - Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0RQ, Oxon, UK
| | - M Degteva
- Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Vorovskt str. 68A, Chelyabinsk, 454141, Russia
| | - S Della Monaca
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - G Etherington
- Public Health England - Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0RQ, Oxon, UK
| | - P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - I Güclu
- Cekmece Nuclear Research and Training Center Radiobiology Unit Yarımburgaz, Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Jaworska
- DSA-Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Skøyen, P. O. Box 329, 0213, Oslo, Norway
| | - D C Lloyd
- Public Health England - Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0RQ, Oxon, UK
| | - I Malátová
- SURO-National Radiation Protection Institute, Bartoskova 28, 14000, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - S McComish
- US Transuranium and Uranium Registries, Washington State University, Richland, WA, USA
| | - D Melo
- Melohill Technology, 1 Research Court, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - J Osko
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, A. Soltana 7, 05400, Otwock, Poland
| | - A Rojo
- ARN-Nuclear Regulatory Authority of Argentina, Av. del Libertador 8250, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Roch-Lefevre
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, IRSN, Pôle Santé et Environnement, Direction de la Santé, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - L Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, IRSN, Pôle Santé et Environnement, Direction de la Santé, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - E Shishkina
- Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), Vorovskt str. 68A, Chelyabinsk, 454141, Russia
- Chelyabinsk State University (ChelSU), 129, Bratiev Kashirinih Street, Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia
| | - N Sotnik
- Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 456780, Russia
| | - S Y Tolmachev
- US Transuranium and Uranium Registries, Washington State University, Richland, WA, USA
| | - A Wieser
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - C Woda
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - M Youngman
- Public Health England - Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0RQ, Oxon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rühm W, Ainsbury E, Breustedt B, Caresana M, Gilvin P, Knežević Ž, Rabus H, Stolarczyk L, Vargas A, Bottollier-Depois J, Harrison R, Lopez M, Stadtmann H, Tanner R, Vanhavere F, Woda C, Clairand I, Fantuzzi E, Fattibene P, Hupe O, Olko P, Olšovcová V, Schuhmacher H, Alves J, Miljanic S. The European radiation dosimetry group – Review of recent scientific achievements. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Bortolin E, De Angelis C, Quattrini MC, Barlascini O, Fattibene P. DETECTION OF IONIZING RADIATION TREATMENT IN GLASS USED FOR HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2019; 186:78-82. [PMID: 30806468 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The treatment with high doses of ionizing radiation is prescribed for the terminal sterilization of many healthcare products. In order to check the product irradiation, it may be useful to develop suitable detection methods. The aim of this work was to verify the suitability of the thermoluminescence (TL) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) techniques to reveal illegal omission of radiation sterilization in glass used for blood test tubes. In particular, this work reports the results of the analysis performed on two batches of glass tubes provided by the same manufacturer. The results indicated that both TL and EPR techniques could reveal the damage induced by high doses of ionizing radiation in the glass allowing the identification of the tubes which were irradiated at the manufacture stage. The study provided also some information about the chemical composition of the two-batch glass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bortolin
- Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Roma, Italy
| | - C De Angelis
- Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Roma, Italy
| | - M C Quattrini
- Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Roma, Italy
| | - O Barlascini
- International Master Courses in Protection Against CBRNe events, Department of Industrial Engineering and School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata
| | - P Fattibene
- Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shishkina EA, Volchkova AY, Ivanov DV, Fattibene P, Wieser A, Krivoschapov VA, Degteva MO, Napier BA. APPLICATION OF EPR TOOTH DOSIMETRY FOR VALIDATION OF THE CALCULATED EXTERNAL DOSES: EXPERIENCE IN DOSIMETRY FOR THE TECHA RIVER COHORT. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2019; 186:70-77. [PMID: 30561681 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncy258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This study applies EPR tooth dosimetry for validation of external doses calculated with the TRDS-2016. EPR-based external dose in tooth enamel is calculated by subtraction of the contributions of natural and anthropogenic sources from the exposure of interest. These subtracted terms may contribute substantially to the overall uncertainty of the EPR-derived external dose. The validation method strongly depends on the uncertainties. The current study combines the results of a number of previous papers to propagate the uncertainty of EPR-derived external doses. It is concluded that the overall uncertainties of D ≥ 500 mGy are comparable with measurement uncertainties (≤30%); the overall uncertainties of D < 500 mGy become higher as the EPR-dose decreases because they are strongly effected by all other factors of influence. More than 70% of investigated individuals were exposed externally to doses <100 mGy with uncertainties >100%. Therefore, the validation task can be solved only based on statistical approaches. The validation of the TRDS-2016 predictions demonstrates good convergence of group-averages with EPR-based doses. The method for validation of the uncertainty of TRDS-2016 predictions should be also designed based on statistical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Shishkina
- Biophys Lab, Urals Research Centre for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), 68-A Vorovsky Street, Chelyabinsk, Russia
- Department of Radiobiology, Chelyabinsk State University (ChelSU), 129, Bratiev Kashirinih Street, Chelyabinsk, Russia
| | - A Yu Volchkova
- Biophys Lab, Urals Research Centre for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), 68-A Vorovsky Street, Chelyabinsk, Russia
| | - D V Ivanov
- Department of Nanospintronics, M. N. Miheev Institute of Metal Physics (IMP), Urals Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, 18, S. Kovalevskaya Str., Yekaterinburg, Russia
- Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University (UrFU), 19, Mira str., Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Core Facilities, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy
| | - A Wieser
- Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Centre for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - V A Krivoschapov
- Biophys Lab, Urals Research Centre for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), 68-A Vorovsky Street, Chelyabinsk, Russia
| | - M O Degteva
- Biophys Lab, Urals Research Centre for Radiation Medicine (URCRM), 68-A Vorovsky Street, Chelyabinsk, Russia
| | - B A Napier
- Energy and Environment Department, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alves JG, Fantuzzi E, Rühm W, Gilvin P, Vargas A, Tanner R, Rabus H, Lopez MA, Breustedt B, Harrison R, Stolarczyk L, Fattibene P, Woda C, Caresana M, Knežević Ž, Bottollier-Depois JF, Clairand I, Mayer S, Miljanic S, Olko P, Schuhmacher H, Stadtmann H, Vanhavere F. EURADOS education and training activities. J Radiol Prot 2019; 39:R37-R50. [PMID: 31307030 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab3256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This paper provides a summary of the Education and Training (E&T) activities that have been developed and organised by the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) in recent years and in the case of Training Courses over the last decade. These E&T actions include short duration Training Courses on well-established topics organised within the activity of EURADOS Working Groups (WGs), or one-day events integrated in the EURADOS Annual Meeting (workshops, winter schools, the intercomparison participants' sessions and the learning network, among others). Moreover, EURADOS has recently established a Young Scientist Grant and a Young Scientist Award. The Grant supports young scientists by encouraging them to perform research projects at other laboratories of the EURADOS network. The Award is given in recognition of excellent work developed within the WGs' work programme. Additionally, EURADOS supports the dissemination of knowledge in radiation dosimetry by promoting and endorsing conferences such as the individual monitoring (IM) series, the neutron and ion dosimetry symposia (NEUDOS) and contributions to E&T sessions at specific events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Alves
- EURADOS, EURADOS e.V. Postfach 1129, D-85758 Neuherberg, Germany. Universidade de Lisboa (UL), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Laboratório de Proteção e Segurança Radiológica (LPSR), Estrada Nacional 10, 2695-066 Bobadela LRS, Portugal. Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares (DECN), Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares (C2TN), do IST, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shishkina EA, Volchkova AY, Timofeev YS, Fattibene P, Wieser A, Ivanov DV, Krivoschapov VA, Zalyapin VI, Della Monaca S, De Coste V, Degteva MO, Anspaugh LR. External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents. Radiat Environ Biophys 2016; 55:477-499. [PMID: 27600653 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0666-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This study summarizes the 20-year efforts for dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of the Techa riverside residents exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of radionuclide releases into the river in 1949-1956. It represents the first combined analysis of all the data available on EPR dosimetry with teeth of permanent residents of the Techa riverside territory. Results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of 302 teeth donated by 173 individuals living permanently in Techa riverside settlements over the period of 1950-1952 were analyzed. These people were residents of villages located at the free-flowing river stream or at the banks of stagnant reservoirs such as ponds or blind river forks. Cumulative absorbed doses measured using EPR are from several sources of exposure, viz., background radiation, internal exposure due to bone-seeking radionuclides (89Sr, 90Sr/90Y), internal exposure due to 137Cs/137mBa incorporated in soft tissues, and anthropogenic external exposure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of different sources of enamel exposure and to deduce external doses to be used for validation of the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS). Since various EPR methods were used, harmonization of these methods was critical. Overall, the mean cumulative background dose was found to be 63 ± 47 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to 89Sr and 90Sr/90Y were within the range of 10-110 mGy; cumulative internal doses due to 137Cs/137mBa depend on the distance from the site of releases and varied from 1 mGy up to 90 mGy; mean external doses were maximum for settlements located at the banks of stagnant reservoirs (~500 mGy); in contrast, external doses for settlements located along the free-flowing river stream did not exceed 160 mGy and decreased downstream with increasing distance from the site of release. External enamel doses calculated using the TRDS code and derived from the EPR measurements were found to be in good agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Shishkina
- Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, 68A, Vorovsky Str., Chelyabinsk, Russia, 454076.
| | - A Yu Volchkova
- Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, 68A, Vorovsky Str., Chelyabinsk, Russia, 454076
| | - Y S Timofeev
- Southern Urals State University, 76, Lenin Av., Chelyabinsk, Russia, 454080
| | - P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - A Wieser
- German Research Centre for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - D V Ivanov
- M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 18 S. Kovalevskaya Street, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 620990
- Ural Federal University, 19 Mira Str, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620002
| | - V A Krivoschapov
- Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, 68A, Vorovsky Str., Chelyabinsk, Russia, 454076
| | - V I Zalyapin
- Southern Urals State University, 76, Lenin Av., Chelyabinsk, Russia, 454080
| | - S Della Monaca
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - V De Coste
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - M O Degteva
- Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, 68A, Vorovsky Str., Chelyabinsk, Russia, 454076
| | - L R Anspaugh
- University of Utah, 201 Presidents Circle, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rühm W, Fantuzzi E, Harrison R, Schuhmacher H, Vanhavere F, Alves J, Bottollier Depois JF, Fattibene P, Knežević Ž, Lopez MA, Mayer S, Miljanić S, Neumaier S, Olko P, Stadtmann H, Tanner R, Woda C. EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016; 168:223-34. [PMID: 25752758 PMCID: PMC4884873 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Revised: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Since autumn 2012, the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has been developing its Strategic Research Agenda (SRA), which is intended to contribute to the identification of future research needs in radiation dosimetry in Europe. The present article summarises-based on input from EURADOS Working Groups (WGs) and Voting Members-five visions in dosimetry and defines key issues in dosimetry research that are considered important for the next decades. The five visions include scientific developments required towards (a) updated fundamental dose concepts and quantities, (b) improved radiation risk estimates deduced from epidemiological cohorts, (c) efficient dose assessment for radiological emergencies, (d) integrated personalised dosimetry in medical applications and (e) improved radiation protection of workers and the public. The SRA of EURADOS will be used as a guideline for future activities of the EURADOS WGs. A detailed version of the SRA can be downloaded as a EURADOS report from the EURADOS website (www.eurados.org).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Rühm
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - E Fantuzzi
- Radiation Protection Institute, ENEA, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - H Schuhmacher
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| | - F Vanhavere
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - J Alves
- Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), CTN, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - J F Bottollier Depois
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy
| | - Ž Knežević
- Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI), Zagreb, Croatia
| | - M A Lopez
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - S Mayer
- Paul Scherer Institut (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - S Miljanić
- Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI), Zagreb, Croatia
| | - S Neumaier
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| | - P Olko
- Instytut Fizyki Jądrowej (IFJ), Krakow, Poland
| | - H Stadtmann
- Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, Seibersdorf, Austria
| | - R Tanner
- Public Health England, Chilton, Didcot, UK
| | - C Woda
- Helmholtz Center Munich, Institute of Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barnard S, Smith R, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Cucu A, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, Bortolin E, Monaca SD, Gil O, Gregoire E, Hadjidekova V, Haghdoost S, Hatzi V, Hempel W, Herranz R, Jaworska A, Lindholm C, Lumniczky K, M'kacher R, Mörtl S, Montoro A, Moquet J, Moreno M, Noditi M, Ogbazghi A, Oestreicher U, Palitti F, Pantelias G, Popescu I, Prieto MJ, Roch-Lefevre S, Roessler U, Romm H, Rothkamm K, Sabatier L, Sebastià N, Sommer S, Terzoudi G, Testa A, Thierens H, Trompier F, Turai I, Vandevoorde C, Vaz P, Voisin P, Vral A, Ugletveit F, Wieser A, Woda C, Wojcik A. Realising the European network of biodosimetry: RENEB-status quo. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015; 164:42-5. [PMID: 25205835 PMCID: PMC4401036 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Creating a sustainable network in biological and retrospective dosimetry that involves a large number of experienced laboratories throughout the European Union (EU) will significantly improve the accident and emergency response capabilities in case of a large-scale radiological emergency. A well-organised cooperative action involving EU laboratories will offer the best chance for fast and trustworthy dose assessments that are urgently needed in an emergency situation. To this end, the EC supports the establishment of a European network in biological dosimetry (RENEB). The RENEB project started in January 2012 involving cooperation of 23 organisations from 16 European countries. The purpose of RENEB is to increase the biodosimetry capacities in case of large-scale radiological emergency scenarios. The progress of the project since its inception is presented, comprising the consolidation process of the network with its operational platform, intercomparison exercises, training activities, proceedings in quality assurance and horizon scanning for new methods and partners. Additionally, the benefit of the network for the radiation research community as a whole is addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany
| | | | - M Atkinson
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - R Smith
- Public Health England, Chilton, UK
| | - J F Barquinero
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain
| | - L Barrios
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain
| | - C Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - C Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institut für Radiobiologie/Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - A Cucu
- National Institute of Public Health Romania, Bucharest, Romania
| | - F Darroudi
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - E Bortolin
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | | | - O Gil
- Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela LRS, Portugal
| | - E Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - V Hadjidekova
- National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - V Hatzi
- National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos, Athens, Greece
| | - W Hempel
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - R Herranz
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Jaworska
- Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Osteraas, Norway
| | - C Lindholm
- Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Research and Environmental Surveillance, Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Lumniczky
- National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - R M'kacher
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - S Mörtl
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - A Montoro
- Fundación para la Investigation del Hospital Universitario la Fe de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Moquet
- Public Health England, Chilton, UK
| | - M Moreno
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Noditi
- National Institute of Public Health Romania, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Ogbazghi
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - F Palitti
- University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
| | - G Pantelias
- National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos, Athens, Greece
| | - I Popescu
- National Institute of Public Health Romania, Bucharest, Romania
| | - M J Prieto
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Roch-Lefevre
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - U Roessler
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany
| | - H Romm
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany
| | | | - L Sabatier
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - N Sebastià
- Fundación para la Investigation del Hospital Universitario la Fe de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Sommer
- Instytut Chemii i Techniki Jadrowej, Warsaw, Poland
| | - G Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos, Athens, Greece
| | - A Testa
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - H Thierens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - F Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - I Turai
- National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - C Vandevoorde
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - P Vaz
- Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela LRS, Portugal
| | - P Voisin
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - A Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - F Ugletveit
- Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Osteraas, Norway
| | - A Wieser
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - C Woda
- Helmholtz Centre Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - A Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alves J, Bottollier-Depois JF, Fantuzzi E, Fattibene P, Lopez MA, Mayer S, Miljanić S, Olko P, Rühm W, Schuhmacher H, Stadtmann H, Vanhavere F. Letter to the editor. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015; 163:268. [PMID: 24854851 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Alves
- Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), CTN, Portugal
| | - J F Bottollier-Depois
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - E Fantuzzi
- ENEA, Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy
| | - P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy
| | - M A Lopez
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT) Madrid, Spain
| | - S Mayer
- Paul Scherer Institut (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - S Miljanić
- Rud̄er Bošković Institute (RBI), Zagreb, Croatia
| | - P Olko
- Instytut Fizyki Ja¸drowej (IFJ), Krakow, Poland
| | - W Rühm
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - H Schuhmacher
- Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| | - H Stadtmann
- Seibersdorf Labor GmbH. Seibersdorf, Austria
| | - F Vanhavere
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bassinet C, Woda C, Bortolin E, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Quattrini M, Bulanek B, Ekendahl D, Burbidge C, Cauwels V, Kouroukla E, Geber-Bergstrand T, Mrozik A, Marczewska B, Bilski P, Sholom S, McKeever S, Smith R, Veronese I, Galli A, Panzeri L, Martini M. Retrospective radiation dosimetry using OSL of electronic components: Results of an inter-laboratory comparison. RADIAT MEAS 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
13
|
Wieser A, Vasilenko E, Aladova E, Fattibene P, Semiochkina N, Smetanin M. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements of absorbed dose in teeth from citizens of Ozyorsk. Radiat Environ Biophys 2014; 53:321-333. [PMID: 24604722 PMCID: PMC3996272 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0527-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2013] [Accepted: 02/21/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
In 1945, within the frame of the Uranium Project for the production of nuclear weapons, the Mayak nuclear facilities were constructed at the Lake Irtyash in the Southern Urals, Russia. The nuclear workers of the Mayak Production Association (MPA), who lived in the city of Ozyorsk, are the focus of epidemiological studies for the assessment of health risks due to protracted exposure to ionising radiation. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements of absorbed dose in tooth enamel have already been used in the past, in an effort to validate occupational external doses that were evaluated in the Mayak Worker Dosimetry System. In the present study, 229 teeth of Ozyorsk citizens not employed at MPA were investigated for the assessment of external background exposure in Ozyorsk. The annually absorbed dose in tooth enamel from natural background radiation was estimated to be (0.7 ± 0.3) mGy. For citizens living in Ozyorsk during the time of routine noble gas releases of the MPA, which peaked in 1953, the average excess absorbed dose in enamel above natural background was (36 ± 29) mGy, which is consistent with the gamma dose obtained by model calculations. In addition, there were indications of possible accidental gaseous MPA releases that affected the population of Ozyorsk, during the early and late MPA operation periods, before 1951 and after 1960.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wieser
- Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bognar G, Cucu A, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, Gil O, Gregoire E, Hadjidekova V, Haghdoost S, Herranz R, Jaworska A, Lindholm C, Mkacher R, Mörtl S, Montoro A, Moquet J, Moreno M, Ogbazghi A, Oestreicher U, Palitti F, Pantelias G, Popescu I, Prieto MJ, Romm H, Rothkamm K, Sabatier L, Sommer S, Terzoudi G, Testa A, Thierens H, Trompier F, Turai I, Vandersickel V, Vaz P, Voisin P, Vral A, Ugletveit F, Woda C, Wojcik A. Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012; 151:621-625. [PMID: 22923244 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
In Europe, a network for biological dosimetry has been created to strengthen the emergency preparedness and response capabilities in case of a large-scale nuclear accident or radiological emergency. Through the RENEB (Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry) project, 23 experienced laboratories from 16 European countries will establish a sustainable network for rapid, comprehensive and standardised biodosimetry provision that would be urgently required in an emergency situation on European ground. The foundation of the network is formed by five main pillars: (1) the ad hoc operational basis, (2) a basis of future developments, (3) an effective quality-management system, (4) arrangements to guarantee long-term sustainability and (5) awareness of the existence of RENEB. RENEB will thus provide a mechanism for quick, efficient and reliable support within the European radiation emergency management. The scientific basis of RENEB will concurrently contribute to increased safety in the field of radiation protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ainsbury EA, Bakhanova E, Barquinero JF, Brai M, Chumak V, Correcher V, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, Gruel G, Guclu I, Horn S, Jaworska A, Kulka U, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Longo A, Marrale M, Monteiro Gil O, Oestreicher U, Pajic J, Rakic B, Romm H, Trompier F, Veronese I, Voisin P, Vral A, Whitehouse CA, Wieser A, Woda C, Wojcik A, Rothkamm K. Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011; 147:573-92. [PMID: 21183550 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
The current focus on networking and mutual assistance in the management of radiation accidents or incidents has demonstrated the importance of a joined-up approach in physical and biological dosimetry. To this end, the European Radiation Dosimetry Working Group 10 on 'Retrospective Dosimetry' has been set up by individuals from a wide range of disciplines across Europe. Here, established and emerging dosimetry methods are reviewed, which can be used immediately and retrospectively following external ionising radiation exposure. Endpoints and assays include dicentrics, translocations, premature chromosome condensation, micronuclei, somatic mutations, gene expression, electron paramagnetic resonance, thermoluminescence, optically stimulated luminescence, neutron activation, haematology, protein biomarkers and analytical dose reconstruction. Individual characteristics of these techniques, their limitations and potential for further development are reviewed, and their usefulness in specific exposure scenarios is discussed. Whilst no single technique fulfils the criteria of an ideal dosemeter, an integrated approach using multiple techniques tailored to the exposure scenario can cover most requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Ainsbury
- Centre for Radiation, Health Protection Agency, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shishkina E, Degteva M, Tolstykh E, Volchkova A, Ivanov D, Wieser A, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P. Extra-high doses detected in the enamel of human teeth in the Techa riverside region. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
17
|
Volchkova A, Shishkina E, Ivanov D, Timofeev Y, Fattibene P, Della Monaca S, Wieser A, Degteva M. Harmonization of dosimetric information obtained by different EPR methods: Experience of the Techa river study. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
18
|
|
19
|
Marrale M, Longo A, Brai M, Barbon A, Brustolon M, Fattibene P. Pulsed EPR analysis of tooth enamel samples exposed to UV and γ-radiations. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
20
|
Bortolin E, Boniglia C, Della Monaca S, Gargiulo R, Fattibene P. Silicates collected from personal objects as a potential fortuitous dosimeter in radiological emergency. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
21
|
|
22
|
|
23
|
Bortolin E, Boniglia C, Della Monaca S, Gargiulo R, Onori S, Fattibene P. Is dust a suitable material for retrospective personal dosimetry? RADIAT MEAS 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
24
|
|
25
|
Signoretti EC, Onori S, Valvo L, Fattibene P, Savella AL, De Sena C, Alimonti S. Ionizing Radiation Induced Effects on Cephradine. Influence of Sample Moisture content, Irradiation Dose and Storage conditions. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2008. [DOI: 10.3109/03639049309050161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
26
|
Signoretti EC, Valvo L, Fattibene P, Onori S, Pantaloni M. Gamma Radiation Induced Effects on Cefuroxime and Cefotaxime. Investigation on Degradation and Syn-Anti Isomerization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2008. [DOI: 10.3109/03639049409042653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
29
|
Veronese I, Fattibene P, Cantone M, De Coste V, Giussani A, Onori S, Shishkina E. EPR and TL-based beta dosimetry measurements in various tooth components contaminated by 90Sr. RADIAT MEAS 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.11.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
30
|
Wieser A, Fattibene P, Shishkina E, Ivanov D, De Coste V, Güttler A, Onori S. Assessment of performance parameters for EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel. RADIAT MEAS 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
31
|
Desrosiers MF, Fattibene P, Le F. An absorbed dose map of bone tissue treated with a radiopharmaceutical in vivo. Health Phys 2007; 92:176-8. [PMID: 17220719 DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000238604.67236.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
A beagle humerus treated with Ho-chelate radiopharmaceutical in vivo was examined by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry. The bone was sectioned and the absorbed dose to each bone fragment was determined by additive re-irradiation of the bone tissue with calibrated doses of gamma radiation. The measured doses ranged from 4.3 Gy to 62 Gy. The highest doses were recorded in the predominately trabecular bone tissue and the lowest doses in the predominately cortical bone tissue. The mean absorbed dose for the entire bone was 17 Gy. The data from 50 bone fragments were combined to create an absorbed dose map of the interior bone surface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M F Desrosiers
- Ionizing Radiation Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wieser A, Vasilenko E, Fattibene P, Bayankin S, El-Faramawy N, Ivanov D, Jacob P, Knyazev V, Onori S, Pressello MC, Romanyukha A, Smetanin M, Ulanovsky A. Comparison of EPR occupational lifetime external dose assessments for Mayak nuclear workers and film badge dose data. Radiat Environ Biophys 2006; 44:279-88. [PMID: 16456671 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-005-0024-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2005] [Accepted: 12/07/2005] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The Mayak worker cohort is one of the major sources of information on health risks due to protracted exposures to plutonium and external ionizing radiation. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements in tooth enamel in combination with personal dose monitoring can help to improve external dose assessment for this cohort. Here, the occupational lifetime external exposure was evaluated individually for 44 nuclear workers of three plants of the Mayak Production Association by EPR measurements of absorbed doses in collected tooth enamel samples. Analysis included consideration of individual background doses in enamel and dose conversion coefficients specific for photon spectra at selected work areas. As a control, background doses were assessed for various age groups by EPR measurements on teeth from non-occupationally exposed Ozyorsk residents. Differences in occupational lifetime doses estimated from the film badges and from enamel for the Mayak workers were found to depend on the type of film badge and the selected plant. For those who worked at the radiochemical processing plant and who were monitored with IFK film badges, the dose was on average 570 mGy larger than estimated from the EPR measurements. However, the average difference was found to be only -4 and 6 mGy for those who were monitored with IFKU film badges and worked at the reactor and the isotope production plant respectively. The discrepancies observed in the dose estimates are attributed to a bias in film badge evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wieser
- GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, 85758 Neuherberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wieser A, Debuyst R, Fattibene P, Meghzifene A, Onori S, Bayankin SN, Brik A, Bugay A, Chumak V, Ciesielski B, Hoshi M, Imata H, Ivannikov A, Ivanov D, Junczewska M, Miyazawa C, Penkowski M, Pivovarov S, Romanyukha A, Romanyukha L, Schauer D, Scherbina O, Schultka K, Sholom S, Skvortsov V, Stepanenko V, Thomas JA, Tielewuhan E, Toyoda S, Trompier F. The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2006; 120:176-83. [PMID: 16702247 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry <300 mGy. Final analysis of results included a correlation analysis between features of laboratory dose reconstruction protocols and dosimetry performance. Applicability of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry at low dose was shown at two applied dose levels of 79 and 176 mGy. Most (9 of 12) laboratories reported the dose to be within 50 mGy of the delivered dose of 79 mGy, and 10 of 12 laboratories reported the dose to be within 100 mGy of the delivered dose of 176 mGy. At the high-dose tested (704 mGy) agreement within 25% of the delivered dose was found in 10 laboratories. Features of EPR dose reconstruction protocols that affect dosimetry performance were found to be magnetic field modulation amplitude in EPR spectrum recording, EPR signal model in spectrum deconvolution and duration of latency period for tooth enamel samples after preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wieser
- Institute of Radiation Protection, GSF-National Research Centre for Environment and Health, D-85758 Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
The effect of sample preparation on dentin electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra was investigated. The analysis was performed on dentin samples prepared by pure mechanical treatment or by an alkaline deproteination method. It was observed that (1) mechanical treatment induces both stable and transient signals, depending on the specific mechanical operation applied; and (2) sodium hydroxide deproteination removes the native signal, but at the same time introduces new confounding signals in the EPR spectrum. Also, it increases the radiation sensitivity of dentin. These findings suggest that attention must be paid to dentin sample preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Fattibene
- Department of Technology and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Roma, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wieser A, Debuyst R, Fattibene P, Meghzifene A, Onori S, Bayankin SN, Blackwell B, Brik A, Bugay A, Chumak V, Ciesielski B, Hoshi M, Imata H, Ivannikov A, Ivanov D, Junczewska M, Miyazawa C, Pass B, Penkowski M, Pivovarov S, Romanyukha A, Romanyukha L, Schauer D, Scherbina O, Schultka K, Shames A, Sholom S, Skinner A, Skvortsov V, Stepanenko V, Tielewuhan E, Toyoda S, Trompier F. The 3rd international intercomparison on EPR tooth dosimetry: Part 1, general analysis. Appl Radiat Isot 2005; 62:163-71. [PMID: 15607443 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The objective of the 3rd International Intercomparison on Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Tooth Dosimetry was the evaluation of laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry below 300 mGy. Participants had to reconstruct the absorbed dose in tooth enamel from 11 molars, which were cut into two halves. One half of each tooth was irradiated in a 60Co beam to doses in the ranges of 30-100 mGy (5 samples), 100-300 mGy (5 samples), and 300-900 mGy (1 sample). Fourteen international laboratories participated in this intercomparison programme. A first analysis of the results and an overview of the essential features of methods applied in different laboratories are presented. The relative standard deviation of results of all methods was better than 27% for applied doses in the range of 79-704 mGy. In the analysis of the unirradiated tooth halves 8% of the samples were identified as outliers with additional absorbed dose above background dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wieser
- GSF-National Research Centre for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Postfach 1129, D-85758 Neuherberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fattibene P, Carosi A, De Coste V, Sacchetti A, Nucara A, Postorino P, Dore P. A comparative EPR, infrared and Raman study of natural and deproteinated tooth enamel and dentin. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50:1095-108. [PMID: 15798310 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/6/004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the present work was to investigate how the native signal observed in the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum of tooth enamel and dentin is associated with the organic content of the two tissues. This was achieved by comparing the EPR native signal and the optical bands (Raman and infrared, IR) associated with organic components of tooth enamel and dentin, in natural and deproteinated samples. The main results were: (a) in natural samples, the organic optical bands are more intense in dentin than in enamel, in contrast with the EPR native signal which shows similar intensity in the two tissues; (b) after deproteination, the optical organic bands are completely suppressed in both dentin and enamel, while the EPR native signal is eliminated only in dentin. It is suggested that the IR and Raman organic bands are originated in the bulk of the organic matrix, while the paramagnetic centres associated with the EPR native signal are located in the organic-mineral interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Fattibene
- INFN and Department of Technology and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, I-00161 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
A pilot program of postal dosimetry intercomparison among 16 Italian Radiotherapy Centers was performed using the ISS Alanine/EPR dosimetry as a transfer system. Dosimeters were irradiated at 10 Gy with high-energy photon beams, both in reference condition in a water phantom and in an anthropomorphic phantom during the simulated treatment of rectum cancer. Intercomparison design along with alanine performances analyzing the different contributions to the combined uncertainty in dose assessment are reported. Main results of the pilot intercomparison, terminated in 2002, are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C De Angelis
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fattibene P, Angelone M, De Coste V, Pillon M. Dosimetric response of tooth enamel to 14 Mev neutrons. Radiat Environ Biophys 2004; 43:85-90. [PMID: 15118864 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-004-0237-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2003] [Accepted: 03/22/2004] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) response of tooth enamel in a monenergetic neutron beam of 14 MeV was studied, with the aim to evaluate the relative neutron to (60)Co sensitivity. Three samples of tooth enamel powder were irradiated in air. A whole tooth and a powdered sample were irradiated in a geometrical PMMA phantom, in order to simulate the real exposure of a tooth inside a human head. The measured dose in enamel was compared to the dose calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. The relative neutron to (60)Co sensitivity using different reference materials (air, water and enamel) was evaluated as well. Large differences in sensitivity values were found depending on the reference material: the obtained relative neutron to (60)Co sensitivity was 0.47+/-0.09 for enamel and 0.15+/-0.03 for water. A comparison with results in fast neutron fields is reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00162 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Trompier F, Fattibene P, Tikunov D, Bartolotta A, Carosi A, Doca MC. EPR dosimetry in a mixed neutron and gamma radiation field. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004; 110:437-442. [PMID: 15353687 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Suitability of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for criticality dosimetry was evaluated for tooth enamel, mannose and alanine pellets during the 'international intercomparison of criticality dosimetry techniques' at the SILENE reactor held in Valduc in June 2002, France. These three materials were irradiated in neutron and gamma-ray fields of various relative intensities and spectral distributions in order to evaluate their neutron sensitivity. The neutron response was found to be around 10% for tooth enamel, 45% for mannose and between 40 and 90% for alanine pellets according their type. According to the IAEA recommendations on the early estimate of criticality accident absorbed dose, analyzed results show the EPR potentiality and complementarity with regular criticality techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Trompier
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, F-92262 Fontenay aux Roses, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance dosimetry based on tooth enamel has one important application in dose reconstruction of nuclear plant workers, where the contribution of neutrons to individual dose is often important. Evaluation of tooth enamel response to neutrons is thus an important goal. A few experimental data at thermal and fast neutron energies are available. A first evaluation of the tooth enamel relative response to 60Co in monoenergetic neutron flux of 2.8 and of 14 MeV, published elsewhere, has provided results apparently non-consistent with the results obtained at lower and higher energies. A comparison of those results in the 2.8 and 14 MeV beams with those available in the literature for other beams is reported and possible reasons for incongruities are discussed. Dose conversion factors of enamel to the water and air are also calculated and reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, I-00161 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Risica S, Fattibene P, Mazzei F, Nuccetelli C, Rogani A. Radionuclides in pregnancy and breast-feeding. Microchem J 2002. [DOI: 10.1016/s0026-265x(02)00070-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
42
|
Abstract
Alanine response to low-energy protons was studied with alanine dosemeters of 2 mm thickness, irradiated with proton beams of energy in the 1.6-6.1 MeV range. The detector's range-averaged relative effectiveness to 60Co radiation ranged from 0.61 to 0.65. For fluence values up to 5 x 10(10) protons x cm(-2), the alanine response was linear.
Collapse
|
43
|
Wieser A, Aragno D, El-Faramawy N, Fattibene P, Meckbach R, Onori S, Pressello MC, Pugliani L, Ulanovsky A, Zankl M. Monte Carlo calculation and experimental verification of the photon energy response of tooth enamel in a head-sized plexiglas phantom. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2002; 101:549-552. [PMID: 12382809 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The use of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry for calculation of organ doses requires conversion of the measured absorbed dose in enamel. Before deriving conversion factors from simulation calculations with a realistic anthropomorphic human phantom, in the current study a simplified phantom was chosen to compare EPR measurement and Monte Carlo calculation. The dose response of tooth enamel of molars at various positions inside a cylindrical Plexiglas phantom of head-size was calculated hy Monte Carlo modelling in parallel photon beams of X rays of 63 keV equivalent energy and 60Co gamma rays (1.25 Mev). For X ray exposure, preliminary results of EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel samples prepared from molars irradiated in the phantom were in agreement with calculation. The mean value of the ratio of the measured to the calculated dose was 0.93 +/- 0.08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wieser
- GSF-National Research Centre, Institute for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Sample preparation of tooth enamel for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry usually involves mechanical operations. The present study shows that mechanical operations performed without water cooling generate a paramagnetic center inducing a stable isotropic EPR signal with g-value of 2.00320 and linewidth of about 0.1 mT. Using EPR spectrum simulation, the similarity between the mechanically induced signal and the signal generated when the enamel is heated in air at a temperature above 600 degrees C was investigated. Results indicate that the mechanically induced signal is related to sample temperature increase during mechanical friction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Aragno
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Physics Laboratory, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
|
47
|
|
48
|
Onori S, De Angelis C, Fattibene P, Pacilio M, Petetti E, Azario L, Miceli R, Piermattei A, Tonghi LB, Cuttone G, Lo Nigro S. Dosimetric characterization of silicon and diamond detectors in low-energy proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45:3045-58. [PMID: 11049187 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/10/320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The dosimetric behaviour of a Scanditronix p-type silicon diode and a PTW natural diamond detector was studied in low-energy proton beams in the 8.3-21.5 MeV range. The properties investigated were linearity, reproducibility, dose rate dependence, energy and linear energy transfer (LET) dependence. The influence of detector thickness on the results of depth dose measurements was also demonstrated. A Markus parallel plate ionization chamber was used for reference dosimetry. Silicon diode and diamond detectors showed linearity at therapeutic dose level, reproducibility better than 1% (1sigma) and sensitivity variation with dose rate and proton energy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Onori
- Physics Laboratory, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry of tooth enamel is now established as a suitable method for individual dose reconstruction following radiation accidents. The accuracy of the method is limited by some confounding factors, among which is the dose received due to medical x-ray irradiation. In the present paper the EPR response of tooth enamel to endoral examination was experimentally evaluated using an anthropomorphic phantom. The dose to enamel for a single exposure of a typical dental examination performed with a new x-ray generation unit working at 65 kVp gave rise to a CO2- signal of intensity similar to that induced by a dose of about 2 mGy of 60Co. EPR measurements were performed on the entire tooth with no attempt to separate buccal and lingual components. Also the dose to enamel for an orthopantomography exam was estimated. It was derived from TLD measurements as equivalent to 0.2 mGy of 60Co. In view of application to risk assessment analysis, in the present work the value for the ratio of the reference dose at the phantom surface measured with TLD to the dose at the tooth measured with EPR was determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Aragno
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Giordano C, Pedone F, Fattibene P, Cellai L. Oligonucleotide labeling: synthesis of a new spin-labeled 2'-deoxyguanosine analogue. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2000; 19:1301-10. [PMID: 11097060 DOI: 10.1080/15257770008033053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In order to achieve an EPR sensitive probe for DNA, 3-carboxy-Proxyl free radical was linked to O-6 of dG through a five-atoms-tether. The modified base was incorporated into a 30-mer ODN, then annealed to its complementary DNA strand. Hydrodynamic parameters show only a slight destabilization with respect to the equivalent unlabeled hybrid. EPR could monitor the hybrid formation showing a progressive enlargement of the upfield signal in passing from the labeled ss- to the ds-30-mer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Giordano
- Centro di Chimica del Farmaco, CNR, Dipartimento di Studi Farmaceutici, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|