1
|
Leppert MH, Poisson SN, Scarbro S, Suresh K, Lisabeth LD, Putaala J, Schwamm LH, Daugherty SL, Bradley CJ, Burke JF, Ho PM. Association of Traditional and Nontraditional Risk Factors in the Development of Strokes Among Young Adults by Sex and Age Group: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2024; 17:e010307. [PMID: 38529631 PMCID: PMC11021148 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite women having fewer traditional risk factors (eg, hypertension, diabetes), strokes are more common in women than men aged ≤45 years. This study examined the contributions of traditional and nontraditional risk factors (eg, migraine, thrombophilia) in the development of strokes among young adults. METHODS This retrospective case-control study used Colorado's All Payer Claims Database (2012-2019). We identified index stroke events in young adults (aged 18-55 years), matched 1:3 to stroke-free controls, by (1) sex, (2) age±2 years, (3) insurance type, and (4) prestroke period. All traditional and nontraditional risk factors were identified from enrollment until a stroke or proxy-stroke date (defined as the prestroke period). Conditional logistic regression models stratified by sex and age group first assessed the association of stroke with counts of risk factors by type and then computed their individual and aggregated population attributable risks. RESULTS We included 2618 cases (52% women; 73.3% ischemic strokes) and 7827 controls. Each additional traditional and nontraditional risk factors were associated with an increased risk of stroke in all sex and age groups. In adults aged 18 to 34 years, more strokes were associated with nontraditional (population attributable risk: 31.4% men and 42.7% women) than traditional risk factors (25.3% men and 33.3% women). The contribution of nontraditional risk factors declined with age (19.4% men and 27.9% women aged 45-55 years). The contribution of traditional risk factors peaked among patients aged 35 to 44 years (32.8% men and 39.7% women). Hypertension was the most important traditional risk factor and increased in contribution with age (population attributable risk: 27.8% men and 26.7% women aged 45 to 55 years). Migraine was the most important nontraditional risk factor and decreased in contribution with age (population attributable risk: 20.1% men and 34.5% women aged 18-35 years). CONCLUSIONS Nontraditional risk factors were as important as traditional risk factors in the development of strokes for both young men and women and have a stronger association with the development of strokes in adults younger than 35 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle H. Leppert
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
- Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (CCOR) Group, Denver, Colorado
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Sharon N. Poisson
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Sharon Scarbro
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
- Rocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO
| | - Krithika Suresh
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lynda D. Lisabeth
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jukka Putaala
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lee H. Schwamm
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Stacie L. Daugherty
- Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (CCOR) Group, Denver, Colorado
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Cathy J. Bradley
- Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - James F. Burke
- Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Cardiology Section, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hess PL, Langner P, Heidenreich PA, Essien U, Leonard C, Swat SA, Polsinelli V, Orlando ST, Grunwald GK, Ho PM. National Trends in Hospital Performance in Guideline-Recommended Pharmacologic Treatment for Heart Failure at Discharge. JACC Heart Fail 2024:S2213-1779(24)00178-1. [PMID: 38573268 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of recommended heart failure (HF) medications has improved over time, but opportunities for improvement persist among women and at rural hospitals. OBJECTIVES This study aims to characterize national trends in performance in the use of guideline-recommended pharmacologic treatment for HF at U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, at which medication copayments are modest. METHODS Among patients discharged from VA hospitals with HF between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019, receipt of all guideline-recommended HF pharmacotherapy among eligible patients was assessed, consisting of evidence-based beta-blockers; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; and oral anticoagulation. RESULTS Of 55,560 patients at 122 hospitals, 32,304 (58.1%) received all guideline-recommended HF medications for which they were eligible. The proportion of patients receiving all recommended medications was higher in 2019 relative to 2013 (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.44-1.65). The median of hospital performance was 59.1% (Q1-Q3: 53.2%-66.2%), improving with substantial variation across sites from 2013 (median 56.4%; Q1-Q3: 50.0%-62.0%) to 2019 (median 65.7%; Q1-Q3: 56.3%-73.5%). Women were less likely to receive recommended therapies than men (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74-0.96). Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to receive recommended therapies (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.79-0.87). Urban hospital location was associated with lower likelihood of medication receipt (aOR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.92). CONCLUSIONS Forty-two percent of patients did not receive all recommended HF medications at discharge, particularly women, minority patients, and those receiving care at urban hospitals. Rates of use increased over time, with variation in performance across hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L Hess
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Paula Langner
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Paul A Heidenreich
- Palo Alto VA Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Utibe Essien
- Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chelsea Leonard
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stanley A Swat
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Vincenzo Polsinelli
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Steven T Orlando
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Gary K Grunwald
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - P Michael Ho
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dunbar PJ, Peterson R, McGrath M, Pomponio R, Kiser TH, Ho PM, Vandivier RW, Burnham EL, Moss M, Sottile PD. Analgesia and Sedation Use During Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure. Crit Care Med 2024:00003246-990000000-00310. [PMID: 38506571 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe U.S. practice regarding administration of sedation and analgesia to patients on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to determine the association of this practice with odds of intubation or death. DESIGN A retrospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING A total of 1017 hospitals contributed data between January 2010 and September 2020 to the Premier Healthcare Database, a nationally representative healthcare database in the United States. PATIENTS Adult (≥ 18 yr) patients admitted to U.S. hospitals requiring NIV for ARF. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We identified 433,357 patients on NIV of whom (26.7% [95% CI] 26.3%-27.0%) received sedation or analgesia. A total of 50,589 patients (11.7%) received opioids only, 40,646 (9.4%) received benzodiazepines only, 20,146 (4.6%) received opioids and benzodiazepines, 1.573 (0.4%) received dexmedetomidine only, and 2,639 (0.6%) received dexmedetomidine in addition to opioid and/or benzodiazepine. Of 433,357 patients receiving NIV, 50,413 (11.6%; 95% CI, 11.5-11.7%) patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation on hospital days 2-5 or died on hospital days 2-30. Intubation was used in 32,301 patients (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.3-7.6%). Further, death occurred in 24,140 (5.6%; 95% CI, 5.5-5.7%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for relevant covariates, receipt of any medication studied was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. In inverse probability weighting, receipt of any study medication was also associated with increased odds of intubation or death (average treatment effect odds ratio 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40). CONCLUSIONS The use of sedation and analgesia during NIV is common. Medication exposure was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. Further investigation is needed to confirm this finding and determine whether any subpopulations are especially harmed by this practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Dunbar
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Ryan Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Max McGrath
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Raymond Pomponio
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Tyree H Kiser
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - R William Vandivier
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Ellen L Burnham
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Marc Moss
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Peter D Sottile
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zigler CK, Adeyemi O, Boyd AD, Braciszewski JM, Cheville A, Cuthel AM, Dailey DL, Del Fiol G, Ezenwa MO, Faurot KR, Justice M, Ho PM, Lawrence K, Marsolo K, Patil CL, Paek H, Richesson RL, Staman KL, Schlaeger JM, O'Brien EC. Collecting patient-reported outcome measures in the electronic health record: Lessons from the NIH pragmatic trials Collaboratory. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 137:107426. [PMID: 38160749 PMCID: PMC10922303 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 27 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of the studies collect patient reported outcome measures as primary or secondary outcomes. Study teams have encountered challenges in the collection of these measures, including challenges related to competing health care system priorities, clinician's buy-in for adoption of patient-reported outcome measures, low adoption and reach of technology in low resource settings, and lack of consensus and standardization of patient-reported outcome measure selection and administration in the electronic health record. In this article, we share case examples and lessons learned, and suggest that, when using patient-reported outcome measures for embedded pragmatic clinical trials, investigators must make important decisions about whether to use data collected from the participating health system's electronic health record, integrate externally collected patient-reported outcome data into the electronic health record, or collect these data in separate systems for their studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina K Zigler
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Oluwaseun Adeyemi
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Andrew D Boyd
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | | | - Andrea Cheville
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Allison M Cuthel
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Dana L Dailey
- St. Ambrose University, Davenport, IA, and University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Miriam O Ezenwa
- University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Keturah R Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Morgan Justice
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Katherine Lawrence
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Crystal L Patil
- University of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Hyung Paek
- Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Rachel L Richesson
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Karen L Staman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Judith M Schlaeger
- University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Emily C O'Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salahuddin T, Hebbe A, Daus M, Essien UR, Waldo SW, Rodriguez F, Ho PM, Simons C, Gilmartin HM, Doll JA. Trends and site-level variation of novel cardiovascular medication utilization among patients admitted for heart failure or coronary artery disease in the US Veterans Affairs System: 2017-2021. Am Heart J 2024; 268:68-79. [PMID: 37956920 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed trends in novel cardiovascular medication utilization in US Veterans Affairs (VA) for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). METHODS We retrospectively identified cohorts from 114 VA hospitals with admission for prevalent 1) systolic heart failure (HF, N = 82,375) or 2) coronary artery disease and diabetes (CAD+T2D, N = 74,209). Site-level data for prevalent filled prescriptions were assessed at hospital admission, discharge, or within 6 months of discharge. Variability among sites was estimated with median odds ratios (mOR), and within-site Pearson correlations of utilization of each medication class were calculated. Site- and patient-level characteristics were compared by high-, mixed-, and low-utilizing sites. RESULTS ARNI and SGTL2i use for HF increased from <5% to 20% and 21%, respectively, while SGTL2i or GLP-1 RA use for CAD+T2D increased from <5% to 30% from 2017 to 2021. Adjusted mOR and 95% confidence intervals for ARNI, SGTL2i for HF, and SGTL2i or GLP-1 RA for CAD+T2D were 1.73 (1.64-1.91), 1.72 (1.59-1.81), and 1.53 (1.45-1.62), respectively. Utilization of each medication class correlated poorly with use of other novel classes (Pearson <0.38 for all). Higher patient volume, number of beds, and hospital complexity correlated with high-utilizing sites. CONCLUSIONS Utilization of novel medications has increased over time but remains suboptimal for US Veterans with HF and CAD+T2D, with substantial site-level heterogeneity despite a universal medication formulary and low out-of-pocket costs for patients. Future work should include further characterization of hospital- and clinician-level practice patterns to serve as targets to increase implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taufiq Salahuddin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Annika Hebbe
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO; Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO; CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Marguerite Daus
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO; Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Utibe R Essien
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stephen W Waldo
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO; Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO; CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Fatima Rodriguez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - P Michael Ho
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Carol Simons
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Heather M Gilmartin
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO; Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO; Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO
| | - Jacob A Doll
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Veterans Health Administration Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO; CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leonard C, Carey E, Holstein A, Ho PM, Heckman JT. Cluster-randomized implementation trial of two facilitation strategies to implement a novel information and communications technology at the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci 2024; 19:1. [PMID: 38166974 PMCID: PMC10759444 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01329-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information and communication technologies (ICTs) improve quality and efficiency of healthcare, but effective practices for implementing new ICTs are unknown. From 2019 to 2021, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented FLOW3, an ICT that facilitates prosthetic limb care. The goal of this study was to compare the impact of two facilitation strategies on FLOW3 adoption, implementation, and sustainment. METHODS FLOW3 is a computerized workflow management system comprised of three applications that facilitate the three steps for prosthesis authorization. During VHA's implementation of FLOW3, we randomized 60 VHA sites to basic or enhanced facilitation groups. Basic facilitation included a manualized training toolkit and office hours. Enhanced facilitation included basic facilitation plus monthly learning collaboratives and site-specific performance reports. Outcomes included time to adoption of FLOW3 and complete FLOW3 utilization rates during implementation and sustainment periods. We compared outcomes between sites assigned to basic versus enhanced facilitation groups. Results were calculated using both intent-to-treat (ITT) and dose-response analyses. The dose-response analysis used a per-protocol approach and required sites in the enhanced facilitation group to join two of six learning collaboratives; sites that attended fewer were reassigned to the basic group. RESULTS Randomization assigned 30 sites to enhanced facilitation and 30 to basic. Eighteen of 30 randomized sites were included in the enhanced facilitation group for dose-response analysis. During the implementation period, enhanced facilitation sites were significantly more likely to completely utilize FLOW3 than basic facilitation sites (HR: 0.17; 95% CI: 1.18, 4.53, p = 0.02) based on ITT analysis. In the dose-response analysis, the enhanced group was 2.32 (95% CI: 1.18, 4.53) times more likely to adopt FLOW3 than basic group (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced facilitation including a learning collaborative and customized feedback demonstrated greater likelihood for sites to complete a prosthetics consult using FLOW3 throughout our study. We identified statistically significant differences in likelihood of adoption using the dose-response analysis and complete utilization rate using ITT analysis during the implementation period. All sites that implemented FLOW3 demonstrated improvement in completion rate during the sustainment period, but the difference between facilitation groups was not statistically significant. Further study to understand sustainability is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Leonard
- Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
- VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Evan Carey
- Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ariel Holstein
- Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Aurora, CO, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Aurora, CO, USA
- Cardiology Section, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Heckman
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Service, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital and Clinics, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sandhu A, Kaltenbach LA, Chiswell K, Shimoga V, Ashur C, Pribish A, Fonarow GC, Piccini JP, Ho PM, Varosy PD, Hess PL. Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Inpatients With Atrial Fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2023; 16:e010062. [PMID: 37929603 PMCID: PMC10842588 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation, the frequency of off-label direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing, associated factors, hospital-level variation, and temporal trends in contemporary practice are unknown. METHODS Using the Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation registry, patients admitted from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2020, and discharged on DOACs were stratified according to receipt of underdosing, overdosing, or recommended dosing. Factors associated with off-label dosing (defined as underdosing or overdosing) were identified using logistic regression. Median odds ratio (OR) and time-series analyses were used to assess hospital-level variation and temporal trends, respectively. RESULTS Of 22 470 patients (70.1±12.1 years, 48.1% female, 82.5% White) prescribed a DOAC at discharge from hospitalization for atrial fibrillation (66% apixaban, 29% rivaroxaban, and 5% dabigatran), underdosing occurred among 2006 (8.9%), overdosing among 511 (2.3%), and recommended dosing among 19 953 (88.8%). The overall rate of off-label dosing was 11.2%. Patient-related factors associated with off-label dose included age (underdosing: OR, 1.06 per 1-year increase [95% CI, 1.06-1.07]; overdosing: OR, 1.07 per 1-year increase [95% CI, 1.06-1.09]), dialysis dependence (underdosing: OR, 5.50 [95% CI, 3.76-8.05]; overdosing: OR, 5.47 [95% CI, 2.74-10.88]), female sex (overdosing: OR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.99]), and weight (overdosing: OR, 0.96 per 1-kg increase [95% CI, 0.95-1.00]). Across hospitals, the adjusted median OR for off-label DOAC dose was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.34-1.65; underdosing: OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.39-1.76]; overdosing: OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.20-1.84]), indicating significant hospital-level variation. Over the study period, recommended dosing significantly increased over time (81.9%-90.9%; P<0.0001 for trend) with a corresponding decline in underdosing (14.4%-6.6%; P<0.0001 for trend) and overdosing (3.8%-2.5%; P=0.001 for trend). CONCLUSIONS Over 1 in 10 patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation are discharged on an off-label DOAC dose with significant variation across hospitals. While the proportion of patients receiving recommended dosing has significantly improved over time, opportunities to improve DOAC dosing persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amneet Sandhu
- Denver VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology
- University of Colorado, Division of Cardiology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - P. Michael Ho
- Denver VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology
- University of Colorado, Division of Cardiology
| | - Paul D. Varosy
- Denver VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology
- University of Colorado, Division of Cardiology
| | - Paul L. Hess
- Denver VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology
- University of Colorado, Division of Cardiology
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abera SM, O’Donnell C, Salahuddin T, Prabhu K, Simons CE, Ho PM, Waldo SW, Doll JA. Assessment of Medication Adherence Using Pharmacy Data Before and After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:2789-2795. [PMID: 37942121 PMCID: PMC10629403 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s431183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Adherence to anti-platelet medications is critical following coronary stenting, but prior studies indicate that clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of adherence are poorly correlated with future medication-taking behavior. We therefore sought to determine if integrated pharmacy data can be used to identify patients at high risk of non-adherence after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Methods Using Veteran Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) data linked with pharmacy records, we assessed adherence to cardiovascular medications from 2012 to 2018. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 0.80. We assessed the association of pre-PCI adherence with post-PCI adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors and clinical outcomes using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. Results Among 56,357 patients, 66.0% filled at least 1 cardiovascular medication within VA for the year prior to PCI and were evaluable for adherence. Pre-PCI non-adherence was 20.7%, and non-adherent patients were more likely to be younger and present non-electively. Non-adherent patients were less likely to adhere to P2Y12 inhibitor therapy after PCI (Adjusted OR 0.45 C.I. 0.41-0.46), compared with adherent patients, and had a higher adjusted risk of mortality (HR 1.17 C.I. 1.03-1.33). Conclusion Adherence to cardiovascular medications prior to PCI can be assessed for most patients using pharmacy data, and past adherence is associated with future adherence and mortality after PCI. Use of integrated pharmacy data to identify high-risk patients could improve outcomes and cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seifu M Abera
- Section of Cardiology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Colin O’Donnell
- Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, VHA Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Taufiq Salahuddin
- Section of Cardiology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Carol E Simons
- Section of Cardiology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephen W Waldo
- Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, VHA Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Washington, DC, USA
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jacob A Doll
- Section of Cardiology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, VHA Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Swat SA, Helmkamp LJ, Tietbohl C, Thompson JS, Fitzgerald M, McIlvennan CK, Harger G, Ho PM, Ahmad FS, Ahmad T, Buttrick P, Allen LA. Clinical Inertia Among Outpatients With Heart Failure: Application of Treatment Nonintensification Taxonomy to EPIC-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail 2023; 11:1579-1591. [PMID: 37589610 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The contribution of clinical inertia to suboptimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES This study examined reasons for GDMT nonintensification and characterized clinical inertia. METHODS In this secondary analysis of EPIC-HF (Electronically Delivered, Patient-Activation Tool for Intensification of Medications for Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction), a randomized clinical trial evaluating a patient-activation tool on GDMT utilization, we performed a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study. Reasons for nonintensification among 4 medication classes were assigned according to an expanded published taxonomy using structured chart reviews. Audio transcripts of clinic encounters were analyzed to further characterize nonintensification reasons. Integration occurred during the interpretation phase. RESULTS Among 292 HFrEF patients who completed a cardiology visit, 185 (63.4%) experienced no treatment intensification, of whom 90 (48.6%) had at least 1 opportunity for intensification of a medication class with no documented contraindication or barriers (ie, clinical inertia). Nonintensification reasons varied by medication class, and included heightened risk of adverse effects (range 18.2%-31.6%), patient nonadherence (range 0.8%-1.1%), patient preferences and beliefs (range 0.6%-0.9%), comanagement with other providers (range 4.6%-5.6%), prioritization of other issues (range 15.6%-31.8%), multiple categories (range 16.5%-22.7%), and clinical inertia (range 22.7%-31.6%). A qualitative analysis of 32 clinic audio recordings demonstrated common characteristics of clinical inertia: 1) clinician review of medication regimens without education or intensification discussions; 2) patient stability as justification for nonintensification; and 3) shorter encounters for nonintensification vs intensification. CONCLUSIONS In this comprehensive study exploring HFrEF prescribing, clinical inertia is a main contributor to nonintensification within an updated taxonomy classification for suboptimal GDMT prescribing. This approach should help target strategies overcoming GDMT underuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley A Swat
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Laura J Helmkamp
- Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Caroline Tietbohl
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jocelyn S Thompson
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Monica Fitzgerald
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Colleen K McIlvennan
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Geoffrey Harger
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Rocky Mountain VA Regional Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Faraz S Ahmad
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Peter Buttrick
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Larry A Allen
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marrs JC, Orlando ST, Saseen JJ, Novins-Montague S, Sandy LC, Waughtal J, Glorioso TJ, Ho PM. Description of patient questions received by clinical pharmacists in the Nudge Study. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2023; 80:1247-1254. [PMID: 37353220 PMCID: PMC10845234 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxad139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Nudge Study is a patient level-randomized trial testing different text message medication refill reminders sent to patients assigned to 4 arms: (1) usual care, (2) generic text, (3) optimized text, and (4) optimized text plus chatbot. This report describes the frequency and types of patient questions sent to clinical pharmacists (CPs) following text reminders. METHODS Patients were enrolled from Denver Health and Hospital Authority (DHHA) and Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VA ECHCS) from October 1, 2019, through May 30, 2021. Included patients responded to at least 1 text or interactive voice response (IVR) message. Patients were dichotomized as those who posed at least 1 question to a CP and those who posed no questions. RESULTS Of the 6,325 patients enrolled in an intervention arm, 3,323 (52.5%) responded to at least 1 text or IVR message, and among those responding, 305 (9.2%) responded with a pharmacist question. Patient factors associated with submitting a CP question included age (45-74 years), enrollment from DHHA, and receipt of the optimized text or optimized text plus chatbot message versus the generic text. Questions to CP were in the following categories: medication related (48.2%), refill logistics (38.4%), cost (9.2%), and other (17.7%). CONCLUSION In a text messaging intervention focused on medication refills, there were few questions directed to the CP. Patients assigned to receive optimized texts were more likely to have questions. We hypothesize that this may suggest greater patient engagement regarding their condition, resulting in more questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel C Marrs
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Steven T Orlando
- Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joseph J Saseen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, and Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sylvie Novins-Montague
- ACCORDS (Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science), Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lisa Caputo Sandy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joy Waughtal
- mHealth Impact Laboratory, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - P Michael Ho
- Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, and Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ebinger JE, Gluckman TJ, Magraner J, Chiu ST, Rider D, Thomas C, Das SR, Ho PM, Shreenivas S, Bradley S. Characterization of Individuals With Apparent Resistant Hypertension Using Contemporary Guidelines: Insights From CV-QUIC. Hypertension 2023; 80:1845-1855. [PMID: 37357771 PMCID: PMC10524942 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.123.20894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apparent resistant hypertension (aRH) carries excess cardiovascular risk beyond nonresistant forms of hypertension; however, our understanding of this at-risk population, as defined by current US practice guidelines, is limited. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and pharmacotherapeutic patterns of patients with aRH using contemporary blood pressure guidance. METHODS We classified patients at 3 large healthcare systems by hypertensive status using contemporary hypertension guidelines. We subsequently described the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with aRH and compared these factors among hypertensive patients without aRH and between those with controlled and uncontrolled aRH. RESULTS A total of 2 420 468 patients were analyzed, of whom 1 343 489 (55.6%) were hypertensive according to contemporary guidelines. Among hypertensive patients, 11 992 (8.5%) met criteria for aRH, with nearly all assessed comorbid conditions, particularly diabetes and heart failure, being more common in those with aRH. When compared with patients with uncontrolled aRH, those with controlled aRH were more frequently prescribed a beta-blocker, diuretic, and nitrate, with the largest standardized difference observed for a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (35.4% versus 10.4%, Cohen D 0.62). Consistent findings were noted in sensitivity analyses using the blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of over 2.4 million individuals, a lower prevalence of aRH was observed than previously reported (12%-15%), but with a high burden of comorbidities. Identification of differences in pharmacotherapy between patients with controlled and uncontrolled aRH, particularly lower rates of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use, help define potential opportunities to improve care and lower cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E. Ebinger
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ty J Gluckman
- Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science, Providence Heart Institute, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jose Magraner
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shih Ting Chiu
- Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science, Providence Heart Institute, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Deanna Rider
- Providence Research Network, Missoula, Montana, USA
| | | | - Sandeep R Das
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Center for Innovation and Value at Parkland, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satya Shreenivas
- Lindner Center for Research, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Steven Bradley
- Healthcare Delivery Innovation Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyd AD, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Lawrence K, Patil CL, Ezenwa MO, O’Brien EC, Paek H, Braciszewski JM, Adeyemi O, Cuthel AM, Darby JE, Zigler CK, Ho PM, Faurot KR, Staman KL, Leigh JW, Dailey DL, Cheville A, Del Fiol G, Knisely MR, Grudzen CR, Marsolo K, Richesson RL, Schlaeger JM. Potential bias and lack of generalizability in electronic health record data: reflections on health equity from the National Institutes of Health Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:1561-1566. [PMID: 37364017 PMCID: PMC10436149 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) play a vital role in addressing current population health problems, and their use of electronic health record (EHR) systems promises efficiencies that will increase the speed and volume of relevant and generalizable research. However, as the number of ePCTs using EHR-derived data grows, so does the risk that research will become more vulnerable to biases due to differences in data capture and access to care for different subsets of the population, thereby propagating inequities in health and the healthcare system. We identify 3 challenges-incomplete and variable capture of data on social determinants of health, lack of representation of vulnerable populations that do not access or receive treatment, and data loss due to variable use of technology-that exacerbate bias when working with EHR data and offer recommendations and examples of ways to actively mitigate bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Boyd
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Katharine Lawrence
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Crystal L Patil
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Miriam O Ezenwa
- University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Emily C O’Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hyung Paek
- Biostatistics (Health Informatics), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Oluwaseun Adeyemi
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Allison M Cuthel
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Juanita E Darby
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Keturah R Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Karen L Staman
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan W Leigh
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dana L Dailey
- Physical Therapy, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Department, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andrea Cheville
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Corita R Grudzen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel L Richesson
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Judith M Schlaeger
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sandhu AT, Heidenreich PA, Borden W, Farmer SA, Ho PM, Hammond G, Johnson JC, Wadhera RK, Wasfy JH, Biga C, Takahashi E, Misra KD, Joynt Maddox KE. Value-Based Payment for Clinicians Treating Cardiovascular Disease: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023; 148:543-563. [PMID: 37427456 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Clinician payment is transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based payment, with reimbursement tied to health care quality and cost. However, the overarching goals of value-based payment-to improve health care quality, lower costs, or both-have been largely unmet. This policy statement reviews the current state of value-based payment and provides recommended best practices for future design and implementation. The policy statement is divided into sections that detail different aspects of value-based payment: (1) key program design features (patient population, quality measurement, cost measurement, and risk adjustment), (2) the role of equity during design and evaluation, (3) adjustment of payment, and (4) program implementation and evaluation. Each section introduces the topic, describes important considerations, and lists examples from existing programs. Each section includes recommended best practices for future program design. The policy statement highlights 4 key themes for successful value-based payment. First, programs should carefully weigh the incentives between lowering cost and improving quality of care and ensure that there is adequate focus on quality of care. Second, the expansion of value-based payment should be a tool for improving equity, which is central to quality of care and should be a focal point of program design and evaluation. Third, value-based payment should continue to move away from fee for service toward more flexible funding that allows clinicians to focus resources on the interventions that best help patients. Last, successful programs should find ways to channel clinicians' intrinsic motivation to improve their performance and the care for their patients. These principles should guide the future development of clinician value-based payment models.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kovach CP, Mesenbring EC, Gupta P, Glorioso TJ, Ho PM, Waldo SW, Schwartz GG. Projected Outcomes of Optimized Statin and Ezetimibe Therapy in US Military Veterans with Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2329066. [PMID: 37638630 PMCID: PMC10463102 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) do not achieve the guideline-directed goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Objective To estimate reductions in the rates of adverse events associated with CAD in a large US military veteran population that may be achieved through use of optimized statin therapy alone or with ezetimibe compared with the prevailing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Design, Setting, and Participants In this observational cohort study, US military veterans with CAD were identified by coronary angiography between June 2015 and September 2020 across 82 US Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities. Exposures The exposures were observed LLT, LLT with an optimized statin regimen, and LLT with optimized statin and ezetimibe. Main Outcomes and Measures Observed rates of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization, and potential reductions in those outcomes with optimized LLT based on expected further reductions in LDL-C levels and application of formulas from The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Results The analysis cohort comprised 111 954 veterans (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [8.8] years; 109 390 men [97.7%]; 91 589 White patients [81.8%]; 17 592 Black patients [15.7%]). The median (IQR) observation period for this study was 3.4 (2.1-4.0) years. At the time of index angiography, 66 877 patients (59.7%) were treated with statin therapy, and 623 patients (0.6%) were treated with ezetimibe. At 6 months, the number of patients with statin prescriptions increased to 74 400 (68.7%), but the number of patients with high-intensity statin prescriptions was only 57 297 (52.9%). At 6 months, ezetimibe use remained low (n = 1168 [1.1%]), and LDL-C levels were 70 mg/dL or more in 56 405 patients (52.1%). At 4 years, observed incidences of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization were 21.6% (95% CI, 21.3%-21.8%), 5.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-5.2%), 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.3%), and 15.4% (95% CI, 15.2%-15.7%), respectively. With optimized statin treatment, projected absolute reductions in these incidences were 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.7%), 0.8% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%), 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%), and 2.3% (95% CI, 2.0%-2.7%), respectively. With optimized statin and ezetimibe treatment, projected absolute reductions were 1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.4%), 1.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.3%), 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.4%), and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.6%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of veterans with CAD, suboptimal LLT was prevalent in the clinical setting. Optimization of statin therapy was projected to produce clinically relevant reductions in the risks of death and cardiovascular events. Despite a lesser lipid-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe, its widespread use on a population level in conjunction with optimized statin therapy may be associated with further meaningful reductions in cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P. Kovach
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Elise C. Mesenbring
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Denver Research Institute, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Prerna Gupta
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
| | - Thomas J. Glorioso
- Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Gregory G. Schwartz
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rolfzen ML, Wick A, Mascha EJ, Shah K, Krause M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Kutner JS, Michael Ho P, Sessler DI, Bartels K. Best Practice Alerts Informed by Inpatient Opioid Intake to Reduce Opioid Prescribing after Surgery (PRIOR): A Cluster Randomized Multiple Crossover Trial. Anesthesiology 2023; 139:186-196. [PMID: 37155372 PMCID: PMC10602614 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overprescription of opioids after surgery remains common. Residual and unnecessarily prescribed opioids can provide a reservoir for nonmedical use. This study therefore tested the hypothesis that a decision-support tool embedded in electronic health records guides clinicians to prescribe fewer opioids at discharge after inpatient surgery. METHODS This study included 21,689 surgical inpatient discharges in a cluster randomized multiple crossover trial from July 2020 to June 2021 in four Colorado hospitals. Hospital-level clusters were randomized to alternating 8-week periods during which an electronic decision-support tool recommended tailored discharge opioid prescriptions based on previous inpatient opioid intake. During active alert periods, the alert was displayed to clinicians when the proposed opioid prescription exceeded recommended amounts. No alerts were displayed during inactive periods. Carryover effects were mitigated by including 4-week washout periods. The primary outcome was oral morphine milligram equivalents prescribed at discharge. Secondary outcomes included combination opioid and nonopioid prescriptions and additional opioid prescriptions until day 28 after discharge. A vigorous state-wide opioid education and awareness campaign was in place during the trial. RESULTS The total postdischarge opioid prescription was a median [quartile 1, quartile 3] of 75 [0, 225] oral morphine milligram equivalents among 11,003 patients discharged when the alerts were active and 100 [0, 225] morphine milligram equivalents in 10,686 patients when the alerts were inactive, with an estimated ratio of geometric means of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.13; P = 0.586). The alert was displayed in 28% (3,074 of 11,003) of the discharges during the active alert period. There was no relationship between the alert and prescribed opioid and nonopioid combination medications or additional opioid prescriptions written after discharge. CONCLUSIONS A decision-support tool incorporated into electronic medical records did not reduce discharge opioid prescribing for postoperative patients in the context of vigorous opioid education and awareness efforts. Opioid prescribing alerts might yet be valuable in other contexts.(Anesthesiology 2023; 139:186-96). EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan L. Rolfzen
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Abraham Wick
- UCHealth, Pharmacy Analytics Core, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Edward J. Mascha
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland
Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Karan Shah
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland
Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Martin Krause
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San
Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Jean S. Kutner
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of
Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of
Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel I. Sessler
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Karsten Bartels
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School
of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Waughtal J, Glorioso TJ, Sandy LM, Peterson PN, Chavez C, Bull S, Ho PM, Allen LA. Patient engagement with prescription refill text reminders across time and major societal events. Cardiovasc Digit Health J 2023; 4:133-136. [PMID: 37600444 PMCID: PMC10290239 DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Waughtal
- Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Lisa M. Sandy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Catia Chavez
- Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sheana Bull
- Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Larry A. Allen
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Derington CG, Goodrich GK, Xu S, Clark NP, Reynolds K, An J, Witt DM, Smith DH, O’Keeffe-Rosetti M, Lang DT, Ho PM, Cheetham TC, Comer AC, King JB. Association of Direct Oral Anticoagulation Management Strategies With Clinical Outcomes for Adults With Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2321971. [PMID: 37410461 PMCID: PMC10326649 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Anticoagulation management services (AMSs; ie, warfarin clinics) have evolved to include patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but it is unknown whether DOAC therapy management services improve outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective To compare outcomes associated with 3 DOAC care models for preventing adverse anticoagulation-related outcomes among patients with AF. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 44 746 adult patients with a diagnosis of AF who initiated oral anticoagulation (DOAC or warfarin) between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, in 3 Kaiser Permanente (KP) regions. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 2021 through May 2023. Exposures Each KP region used an AMS to manage warfarin but used distinct approaches to DOAC care: (1) usual care (UC) by the prescribing clinician, (2) UC plus an automated population management tool (PMT), or (3) pharmacist-managed AMS care. Propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs) were estimated. Direct oral anticoagulant care models were first indirectly compared using warfarin as a common comparator within each region and then directly compared across regions. Main Outcomes and Measures Patients were followed up until the first occurrence of an outcome (composite of thromboembolic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, other major bleeding, or death), discontinuation of KP membership, or December 31, 2020. Results Overall, 44 746 patients were included: 6182 in the UC care model (3297 DOAC; 2885 warfarin), 33 625 in the UC plus PMT care model (21 891 DOAC; 11 734 warfarin), and 4939 in the AMS care model (2089 DOAC; 2850 warfarin). Baseline characteristics (mean [SD] age, 73.1 [10.6] years, 56.1% male, 67.2% non-Hispanic White, median CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, female sex] score of 3 [IQR, 2-5]) were well balanced after IPTW. Over a median follow-up of 2 years, patients who received the UC plus PMT or AMS care model did not have significantly better outcomes than those who received UC. The incidence rate of the composite outcome was 5.4% per year for DOAC and 9.1% per year for warfarin for those in the UC group, 6.1% per year for DOAC and 10.5% per year for those in the UC plus PMT group, and 5.1% per year for DOAC and 8.0% per year for those in the AMS group. The IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite outcome comparing DOAC vs warfarin were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-1.05) in the UC group, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90) in the UC plus PMT group, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.99) in the AMS group (P = .62 for heterogeneity across care models). When directly comparing patients receiving DOAC, the IPTW-adjusted HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.85-1.34) for the UC plus PMT group vs the UC group and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.71-1.02) for the AMS group vs the UC group. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study did not find appreciably better outcomes for patients receiving DOAC who were managed by either a UC plus PMT or AMS care model compared with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G. Derington
- Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | | | - Stanley Xu
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena
| | | | - Kristi Reynolds
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena
| | - Jaejin An
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena
| | - Daniel M. Witt
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City
| | - David H. Smith
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Daniel T. Lang
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora
| | | | - Angela C. Comer
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver
| | - Jordan B. King
- Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dodge JR, Youles B, Caldararo J, Sears ED, Caverly TJ, Michael Ho P, Shimada SL, Kaboli P, Albright K, Robinson SA, McNeal DM, Damschroder L, Saini SD, Adams MA. Engaging Operational Partners Is Critical for Successful Implementation of Research Products: a Coincidence Analysis of Access-Related Projects in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:923-930. [PMID: 37340262 PMCID: PMC10356702 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08115-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has prioritized timely access to care and has invested substantially in research aimed at optimizing veteran access. However, implementing research into practice remains challenging. Here, we assessed the implementation status of recent VHA access-related research projects and explored factors associated with successful implementation. DESIGN We conducted a portfolio review of recent VHA-funded or supported projects (1/2015-7/2020) focused on healthcare access ("Access Portfolio"). We then identified projects with implementable research deliverables by excluding those that (1) were non-research/operational projects; (2) were only recently completed (i.e., completed on or after 1/1/2020, meaning that they were unlikely to have had time to be implemented); and (3) did not propose an implementable deliverable. An electronic survey assessed each project's implementation status and elicited barriers/facilitators to implementing deliverables. Results were analyzed using novel Coincidence Analysis (CNA) methods. PARTICIPANTS/KEY RESULTS Among 286 Access Portfolio projects, 36 projects led by 32 investigators across 20 VHA facilities were included. Twenty-nine respondents completed the survey for 32 projects (response rate = 88.9%). Twenty-eight percent of projects reported fully implementing project deliverables, 34% reported partially implementing deliverables, and 37% reported not implementing any deliverables (i.e., resulting tool/intervention not implemented into practice). Of 14 possible barriers/facilitators assessed in the survey, two were identified through CNA as "difference-makers" to partial or full implementation of project deliverables: (1) engagement with national VHA operational leadership; (2) support and commitment from local site operational leadership. CONCLUSIONS These findings empirically highlight the importance of operational leadership engagement for successful implementation of research deliverables. Efforts to strengthen communication and engagement between the research community and VHA local/national operational leaders should be expanded to ensure VHA's investment in research leads to meaningful improvements in veterans' care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has prioritized timely access to care and has invested substantially in research aimed at optimizing veteran access. However, implementing research findings into clinical practice remains challenging, both within and outside VHA. Here, we assessed the implementation status of recent VHA access-related research projects and explored factors associated with successful implementation. Only two factors were identified as "difference-makers" to adoption of project findings into practice: (1) engagement with national VHA leadership or (2) support and commitment from local site leadership. These findings highlight the importance of leadership engagement for successful implementation of research findings. Efforts to strengthen communication and engagement between the research community and VHA local/national leaders should be expanded to ensure VHA's investment in research leads to meaningful improvements in veterans' care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Dodge
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bradley Youles
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Caldararo
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Erika D Sears
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tanner J Caverly
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephanie L Shimada
- VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Peter Kaboli
- Iowa City VA Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Karen Albright
- Iowa City VA Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephanie A Robinson
- VA Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, USA
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Demetria M McNeal
- Iowa City VA Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura Damschroder
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sameer D Saini
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan A Adams
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boyd AD, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Lawrence K, Patil CL, Ezenwa MO, O'Brien EC, Paek H, Braciszewski JM, Adeyemi O, Cuthel AM, Darby JE, Zigler CK, Ho PM, Faurot KR, Staman K, Leigh JW, Dailey DL, Cheville A, Del Fiol G, Knisely MR, Marsolo K, Richesson RL, Schlaeger JM. Equity and bias in electronic health records data. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 130:107238. [PMID: 37225122 PMCID: PMC10330606 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) are conducted during routine clinical care and have the potential to increase knowledge about the effectiveness of interventions under real world conditions. However, many pragmatic trials rely on data from the electronic health record (EHR) data, which are subject to bias from incomplete data, poor data quality, lack of representation from people who are medically underserved, and implicit bias in EHR design. This commentary examines how the use of EHR data might exacerbate bias and potentially increase health inequities. We offer recommendations for how to increase generalizability of ePCT results and begin to mitigate bias to promote health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Boyd
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| | | | - Katharine Lawrence
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Crystal L Patil
- University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Miriam O Ezenwa
- University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Emily C O'Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Hyung Paek
- Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | | | - Oluwaseun Adeyemi
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Allison M Cuthel
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Juanita E Darby
- University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Christina K Zigler
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Keturah R Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Karen Staman
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Jonathan W Leigh
- University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Dana L Dailey
- St. Ambrose University, Davenport, IA, United States of America; University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Andrea Cheville
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | | | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Rachel L Richesson
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Judith M Schlaeger
- University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mistry N, Richardson V, Carey E, Porter S, Pincus S, Novins-Montague S, Elmer M, Lin CT, Ho PM, Anstett T. General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization. Trials 2023; 24:314. [PMID: 37158929 PMCID: PMC10165805 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of guidelines. Here, we report a novel prospective, randomized control trial to increase guideline-concordant pRBC transfusions comparing three variations of clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS All inpatient providers at University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) who order blood transfusions were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the three arms of the study: (1) general order set improvements, (2) general order set improvements plus non-interruptive in-line help text alert, and (3) general order set improvements plus interruptive alert. Transfusing providers received the same randomized order set changes for 18 months. The primary outcome of this study is the guideline-concordant rate of pRBC transfusions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the group using the new interface (arm 1) versus the two groups using the new interface with interruptive or non-interruptive alerts (arms 2 and 3, combined). The secondary objectives compare guideline-concordant transfusion rates between arm 2 and arm 3 as well as comparing all of arms of the study in aggregate to historical controls. This trial concluded after 12 months on April 5, 2022. DISCUSSION CDS tools can increase guideline-concordant behavior. This trial will examine three different CDS tools to determine which type is most effective at increasing guideline-concordant blood transfusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 3/20/21, NCT04823273 . Approved by University of Colorado Institutional Review Board (19-0918), protocol version 1 4/19/2019, approved 4/30/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelam Mistry
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17Th Avenue, Mailstop F-782, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Vanessa Richardson
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Evan Carey
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Samuel Porter
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17Th Avenue, Mailstop F-782, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Sharon Pincus
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sylvie Novins-Montague
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Megan Elmer
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chen-Tan Lin
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tyler Anstett
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17Th Avenue, Mailstop F-782, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- The NavLab, an Adult and Child Consortium of Outcome Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reynolds PM, Afshar M, Wright GC, Ho PM, Kiser TH, Sottile PD, Althoff MD, Moss M, Jolley SE, Vandivier RW, Burnham EL. Association between Substance Misuse and Outcomes in Critically III Patients with Pneumonia. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:556-565. [PMID: 37000145 PMCID: PMC10112399 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202206-532oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: In patients with pneumonia requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, alcohol misuse is associated with increased mortality, but the relationship between other commonly misused substances and mortality is unknown. Objectives: We sought to establish whether alcohol misuse, cannabis misuse, opioid misuse, stimulant misuse, or misuse of more than one of these substances was associated with differences in mortality among ICU patients with pneumonia. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitals participating in the Premier Healthcare Database between 2010 and 2017. Patients were included if they had a primary or secondary diagnosis of pneumonia and received antibiotics or antivirals within 1 day of admission. Substance misuse related to alcohol, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids, or more than one substance, were identified from the International Classification of Diseases (Ninth and Tenth Editions). The associations between substance misuse and in-hospital mortality were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes included the measured associations between substance misuse disorders and mechanical ventilation, as well as vasopressor and continuous paralytic administration. Analyses were conducted with multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression modeling adjusting for age, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Results: A total of 167,095 ICU patients met inclusion criteria for pneumonia. Misuse of alcohol was present in 5.0%, cannabis misuse in 0.6%, opioid misuse in 1.5%, stimulant misuse in 0.6%, and misuse of more than one substance in 1.2%. No evidence of substance misuse was found in 91.1% of patients. In unadjusted analyses, alcohol misuse was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.19), whereas opioid misuse was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.53) compared with no substance misuse. These findings persisted in adjusted analyses. Although cannabis, stimulant, and more than one substance misuse (a majority of which were alcohol in combination with another substance) were associated with lower odds for in-hospital mortality in unadjusted analyses, these relationships were not consistently present after adjustment. Conclusions: In this study of ICU patients hospitalized with severe pneumonia, substance misuse subtypes were associated with different effects on mortality. Although administrative data can provide epidemiologic insight regarding substance misuse and pneumonia outcomes, biases inherent to these data should be considered when interpreting results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Reynolds
- University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Department of Pharmacy, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; and
| | - Majid Afshar
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Garth C. Wright
- University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and
| | - Tyree H. Kiser
- University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
| | - Peter D. Sottile
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Meghan D. Althoff
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Marc Moss
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sarah E. Jolley
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - R. William Vandivier
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Ellen L. Burnham
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Weisbord SD, Mor MK, Hochheiser H, Kim N, Ho PM, Bhatt DL, Fine MJ, Palevsky PM. Utilization and Outcomes of Clinically Indicated Invasive Cardiac Care in Veterans with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:694-705. [PMID: 36735537 PMCID: PMC10103279 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Of studies reporting an association of CKD with lower use of invasive cardiac care to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS), just one accounted for the appropriateness of such care. However, its findings in patients hospitalized nearly 30 years ago may not apply to current practice. In a more recent cohort of 64,695 veterans hospitalized with ACS, CKD was associated with a 32% lower likelihood of receiving invasive care determined to be clinically indicated. Among patients with CKD, not receiving such care was associated with a 1.39-fold higher risk of 6-month mortality. Efforts to elucidate the reasons for this disparity in invasive care in patients with ACS and CKD and implement tailored interventions to enhance its use in this population may offer the potential to improve clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that patients with CKD are less likely than those without CKD to receive invasive care to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, few studies have accounted for whether such care was clinically indicated or assessed whether nonuse of such care was associated with adverse health outcomes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US veterans who were hospitalized at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers from January 2013 through December 2017 and received a discharge diagnosis of ACS. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate the association of CKD with use of invasive care (coronary angiography, with or without revascularization; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; or both) deemed clinically indicated based on Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 risk scores that denoted a 6-month predicted all-cause mortality ≥5%. Using propensity scoring and inverse probability weighting, we examined the association of nonuse of clinically indicated invasive care with 6-month all-cause mortality. RESULTS Among 34,430 patients with a clinical indication for invasive care, the 18,780 patients with CKD were less likely than the 15,650 without CKD to receive such care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.72). Among patients with CKD, nonuse of invasive care was associated with higher risk of 6-month all-cause mortality (absolute risk, 21.5% versus 15.5%; absolute risk difference 6.0%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 1.49). Findings were consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS In contemporary practice, veterans with CKD who experience ACS are less likely than those without CKD to receive clinically indicated invasive cardiac care. Nonuse of such care is associated with increased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven D. Weisbord
- From the Renal Section, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria K. Mor
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Harry Hochheiser
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nadejda Kim
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Cardiology Section, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Deepak L. Bhatt
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY
| | - Michael J. Fine
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul M. Palevsky
- From the Renal Section, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abbate LM, Ollerenshaw LV, Kottmeyer BM, McQuown CM, Ragsdale LC, Richardson VL, Ho PM, Ginde AA, O'Malley SM. Integrating Physical Therapy into an Emergency Department: A Clinical Pilot Program. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:424-427. [PMID: 36912801 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Abbate
- Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Benjamin M Kottmeyer
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Colleen M McQuown
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinic Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - P Michael Ho
- VA Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care, Aurora, CO
| | - Adit A Ginde
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Shane M O'Malley
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sterbis E, Lindquist J, Jensen A, Hong M, Gupta S, Ryu R, Ho PM, Trivedi P. Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates Associated With Passive and Active Surveillance Strategies Adopted by Implanting Physicians. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e233211. [PMID: 36929400 PMCID: PMC10020881 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Inferior vena cava filters are commonly implanted and infrequently retrieved. Nonretrieval contributes to significant morbidity, motivating US Food and Drug Administration and multisociety communications emphasizing the need for improved device surveillance. Current guidelines suggest that implanting physicians and referring physicians should be responsible for device follow-up, but it is not known whether shared responsibility contributes to lower retrieval. OBJECTIVE To determine if primary responsibility for follow-up care assumed by the implanting physician team is associated with increased device retrieval. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study examined a prospectively collected registry of patients with inferior vena cava filters implanted from June 2011 to September 2019. Medical record review and data analysis was completed in 2021. The study included 699 patients who underwent implantation of retrievable inferior vena cava filters at an academic quaternary care center. EXPOSURES Prior to 2016, implanting physicians had a passive surveillance strategy whereby letters highlighting indications for and the need for timely retrieval were mailed to patients and ordering clinicians. Starting in 2016, implanting physicians assumed active responsibility for surveillance, whereby candidacy for device retrieval was assessed periodically via phone calls and retrieval scheduled when appropriate. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was the odds of inferior vena cava filter nonretrieval. Within regression modeling of the association between the surveillance method and nonretrieval, additional covariates of patient demographics, concomitant malignant neoplasm, and presence of thromboembolic disease were included. RESULTS Of the 699 patients who received retrievable filter implants, 386 (55.2%) were followed up with passive surveillance, 313 (44.8%) with active surveillance, 346 (49.5%) were female, 100 (14.3%) were Black individuals, and 502 (71.8%) were White individuals. The mean (SD) age at filter implantation was 57.1 (16.0) years. Mean (SD) yearly filter retrieval increased following the adoption of active surveillance, from 190 of 386 (48.7%) to 192 of 313 (61.3%) (P < .001). Fewer filters were deemed permanent in the active group vs passive group (5 of 313 [1.6%] vs 47 of 386 [12.2%]; P < .001). Age at the time of implantation (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), concomitant malignant neoplasm (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.47-3.24), and passive contact method (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.18-2.47) were associated with increased odds of filter nonretrieval. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cohort study suggest that active surveillance by implanting physicians is associated with improved inferior vena cava filter retrieval. These findings support encouraging physicians who implant the filter to take primary responsibility for tracking and retrieval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Sterbis
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Jonathan Lindquist
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Alexandria Jensen
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora
| | - Michael Hong
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Shane Gupta
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Robert Ryu
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, VA Eastern Colorado Health System, Aurora
| | - Premal Trivedi
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stryczek KC, Honsberger M, Ball SL, Barnard JG, Young JP, Felker B, Au DH, Ho PM, Kirsh SR, Sayre GG. VA Outreach Is an Essential Area for Improving Veterans' Health Care Accessibility. Mil Med 2023; 188:usad019. [PMID: 36790439 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is tasked with providing access to health care to veterans of military service. However, many eligible veterans have either not yet enrolled or underutilized VHA services. Further study of barriers to access before veterans enroll in VHA care is necessary to understand how to address this issue. The ChooseVA (née MyVA Access) initiative aims to achieve this mission to improve veterans' health care access. Although veteran outreach was not specifically addressed by the initiative, it is a critical component of improving veterans' access to health care. Findings from this multisite evaluation of ChooseVA implementation describe sites' efforts to improve VHA outreach and veterans' experiences with access. MATERIALS AND METHODS This quality improvement evaluation employed a multi-method qualitative methodology, including 127 semi-structured interviews and 81 focus groups with VHA providers and staff ("VHA staff") completed during 21 VHA medical center facility site visits between July and November 2017 and 48 telephone interviews with veterans completed between May and October 2018. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analyzed using deductive and inductive analysis to capture challenges and strategies to improve VHA health care access (VHA staff data), experiences with access to care (veteran data), barriers and facilitators to care (staff and veteran data), contextual factors, and emerging categories and themes. We developed focused themes describing perceived challenges, descriptions of VHA staff efforts to improve veteran outreach, and veterans' experiences with accessing VHA health care. RESULTS VHA staff and veteran respondents reported a lack of veteran awareness of eligibility for VHA services. Veterans reported limited understanding of the range of services offered. This awareness gap served as a barrier to veterans' ability to successfully access VHA health care services. Veterans described this awareness gap as contributing to delayed VHA enrollment and delayed or underutilized health care benefits and services. Staff focused on community outreach and engaging veterans for VHA enrollment as part of their efforts to implement the ChooseVA access initiative. Staff and veteran respondents agreed that outreach efforts were helpful for engaging veterans and facilitating access. CONCLUSIONS Although efforts across VHA programs informed veterans about VHA services, our results suggest that both VHA staff and veterans agreed that missed opportunities exist. Gaps include veterans' lack of awareness or understanding of VHA benefits for which they qualify for. This can result in delayed access to care which may negatively impact veterans, including those separating from the military and vulnerable populations such as veterans who experience pregnancy or homelessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krysttel C Stryczek
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Research & Development, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Mark Honsberger
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Research & Development, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Sherry L Ball
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Research & Development, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Juliana G Barnard
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jessica P Young
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services Research & Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
| | - Bradford Felker
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services Research & Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - David H Au
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services Research & Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-6522, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Susan R Kirsh
- The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC 20420, USA
| | - George G Sayre
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services Research & Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Morse B, Anstett T, Mistry N, Porter S, Pincus S, Lin CT, Novins-Montague S, Ho PM. User-Centered Design to Reduce Inappropriate Blood Transfusion Orders. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:28-36. [PMID: 36630999 PMCID: PMC9833954 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve blood transfusion practices, we applied user-centered design (UCD) to evaluate potential changes to blood transfusion orders. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study is to build effective transfusion orders with different designs to improve guideline adherence. METHODS We developed three different versions of transfusion orders that varied how information was presented to clinicians ordering blood transfusions. We engaged 14 clinicians (residents, advanced practice providers [APPs], and attending physicians) from different specialties. We used the think aloud technique and rapid qualitative analysis to generate themes to incorporate into our modified orders. RESULTS Most end-users who participated in the semi-structured interviews preferred the interruptive alert design plus behavioral nudges (n = 8/14, 57%). The predominant rationale was that the in-line alert was not visually effective in capturing the end-user's attention, while the interruptive alert forced a brief stop in the workflow to consider the guidelines. All users supported the general improvements, though for different reasons, and as a result, the general improvements remained in the designs for the forthcoming trial. CONCLUSION The user experience uncovered through the think aloud approach produced a clear and rich understanding of potentially confounding factors in the initial design of different intervention versions. Input from end-users guided the creation of all three designs so each was addressing human factors with parity, which ensured that the results of our study reflected differences in interruptive properties of the alerts and not differences in design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad Morse
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States,Address for correspondence Brad Morse, PhD, MA Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine1890 N Revere Ct, Aurora, CO 80045United States
| | - Tyler Anstett
- Department of Medicine, Division Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Neelam Mistry
- Department of Medicine, Division Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Samuel Porter
- Department of Medicine, Division Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Sharon Pincus
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science/The NavLab, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Chen-Tan Lin
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Sylvie Novins-Montague
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science/The NavLab, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zakrajsek JK, Min SJ, Ho PM, Kiser TH, Kannappan A, Sottile PD, Allen RR, Althoff MD, Reynolds PM, Moss M, Burnham EL, Mikkelsen ME, Vandivier RW. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Asthma Exacerbations With Respiratory Failure. Chest 2023; 163:38-51. [PMID: 36191634 PMCID: PMC10354700 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma exacerbations with respiratory failure (AERF) are associated with hospital mortality of 7% to 15%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a salvage therapy for refractory AERF, but controlled studies showing its association with mortality have not been performed. RESEARCH QUESTION Is treatment with ECMO associated with lower mortality in refractory AERF compared with standard care? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This is a retrospective, epidemiologic, observational cohort study using a national, administrative data set from 2010 to 2020 that includes 25% of US hospitalizations. People were included if they were admitted to an ECMO-capable hospital with an asthma exacerbation, and were treated with short-acting bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids, and invasive ventilation. People were excluded for age < 18 years, no ICU stay, nonasthma chronic lung disease, COVID-19, or multiple admissions. The main exposure was ECMO vs No ECMO. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Key secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, time receiving invasive ventilation, and total hospital costs. RESULTS The study analyzed 13,714 patients with AERF, including 127 with ECMO and 13,587 with No ECMO. ECMO was associated with reduced mortality in the covariate-adjusted (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P = .001), propensity score-adjusted (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.81; P = .01), and propensity score-matched models (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.98; P = .04) vs No ECMO. Sensitivity analyses showed that mortality reduction related to ECMO ranged from OR 0.34 to 0.61. ECMO was also associated with increased hospital costs in all three models (P < .0001 for all) vs No ECMO, but not with decreased ICU LOS, hospital LOS, or time receiving invasive ventilation. INTERPRETATION ECMO was associated with lower mortality and higher hospital costs, suggesting that it may be an important salvage therapy for refractory AERF following confirmatory clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan K Zakrajsek
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Sung-Joon Min
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - P Michael Ho
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Tyree H Kiser
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Arun Kannappan
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Peter D Sottile
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Meghan D Althoff
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Paul M Reynolds
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Marc Moss
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Ellen L Burnham
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Mark E Mikkelsen
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - R William Vandivier
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Henderson K, Kaufman B, Rotter JS, Stearns S, Sueta CAA, Foraker R, Ho PM, Chang PP. Socioeconomic status and modification of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction: epidemiological analysis using data from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058777. [PMID: 36343998 PMCID: PMC9644311 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine whether the relationship between the pooled cohort equations (PCE) predicted 10-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and absolute risk for ASCVD is modified by socioeconomic status (SES). DESIGN Population-based longitudinal cohort study-Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC)-investigating the development of cardiovascular disease across demographic subgroups. SETTING Four communities in the USA-Forsyth County, North Carolina, Jackson, Mississippi, suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota and Washington County, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS We identified 9782 ARIC men and women aged 54-73 without ASCVD at study visit 4 (1996-1998). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Risk ratio (RR) differences in 10-year incident hospitalisations or death for ASCVD by SES and PCE predicted 10-year ASCVD risk categories to assess for risk modification. SES measures included educational attainment and census-tract neighbourhood deprivation using the Area Deprivation Index. PCE risk categories were 0%-5%, >5%-10%, >10%-15% and >15%. SES as a prognostic factor to estimate ASCVD absolute risk categories was further investigated as an interaction term with the PCE. RESULTS ASCVD RRs for participants without a high school education (referent college educated) increased at higher PCE estimated risk categories and was consistently >1. Results indicate education is both a risk modifier and delineates populations at higher ASCVD risk independent of PCE. Neighbourhood deprivation did modify association but was less consistent in direction of effect. However, for participants residing in the most deprived neighbourhoods (referent least deprived neighbourhoods) with a PCE estimated risk >10%-15%, risk was significantly elevated (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.59). Education and neighbourhood deprivation inclusion as an interaction term on the PCE risk score was statistically significant (likelihood ratio p≤0.0001). CONCLUSIONS SES modifies the association between PCE estimated risk and absolute risk of ASCVD. SES added into ASCVD risk prediction models as an interaction term may improve our ability to predict absolute ASCVD risk among socially disadvantaged populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal Henderson
- Cardiology Section, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Brystana Kaufman
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jason S Rotter
- Mathematica Policy Research Inc, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sally Stearns
- Health Policy & Management, University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carla A A Sueta
- Department of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Randi Foraker
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Brown School of Public Health, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Cardiology Section, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Patricia P Chang
- Department of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Trivedi PS, Timpone VM, Morgan RL, Jensen AM, Reid M, Ho PM, Ahmed O. A Practical Guide to Use of Publicly Available Data Sets for Observational Research in Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2022; 33:1286-1294. [PMID: 35964883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Observational data research studying access, utilization, cost, and outcomes of image-guided interventions using publicly available "big data" sets is growing in the interventional radiology (IR) literature. Publicly available data sets offer insight into real-world care and represent an important pillar of IR research moving forward. They offer insights into how IR procedures are being used nationally and whether they are working as intended. On the other hand, large data sources are aggregated using complex sampling frames, and their strengths and weaknesses only become apparent after extensive use. Unintentional misuse of large data sets can result in misleading or sometimes erroneous conclusions. This review introduces the most commonly used databases relevant to IR research, highlights their strengths and limitations, and provides recommendations for use. In addition, it summarizes methodologic best practices pertinent to all data sets for planning and executing scientifically rigorous and clinically relevant observational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Premal S Trivedi
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Vincent M Timpone
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rustain L Morgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Alexandria M Jensen
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics (A.M.J., M.R.), University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Margaret Reid
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics (A.M.J., M.R.), University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Trinkley KE, Ho PM, Glasgow RE, Huebschmann AG. How Dissemination and Implementation Science Can Contribute to the Advancement of Learning Health Systems. Acad Med 2022; 97:1447-1458. [PMID: 35796045 PMCID: PMC9547828 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Many health systems are working to become learning health systems (LHSs), which aim to improve the value of health care by rapidly, continuously generating evidence to apply to practice. However, challenges remain to advance toward the aspirational goal of becoming a fully mature LHS. While some important challenges have been well described (i.e., building system-level supporting infrastructure and the accessibility of inclusive, integrated, and actionable data), other key challenges are underrecognized, including balancing evaluation rapidity with rigor, applying principles of health equity and classic ethics, focusing on external validity and reproducibility (generalizability), and designing for sustainability. Many LHSs focus on continuous learning cycles, but with limited consideration of issues related to the rapidity of these learning cycles, as well as the sustainability or generalizability of solutions. Some types of data have been consistently underrepresented, including patient-reported outcomes and preferences, social determinants, and behavioral and environmental data, the absence of which can exacerbate health disparities. A promising approach to addressing many challenges that LHSs face may be found in dissemination and implementation (D&I) science. With an emphasis on multilevel dynamic contextual factors, representation of implementation partner engagement, pragmatic research, sustainability, and generalizability, D&I science methods can assist in overcoming many of the challenges facing LHSs. In this article, the authors describe the current state of LHSs and challenges to becoming a mature LHS, propose solutions to current challenges, focusing on the contributions of D&I science with other methods, and propose key components and characteristics of a mature LHS model that others can use to plan and develop their LHSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katy E Trinkley
- K.E. Trinkley is associate professor, Departments of Clinical Pharmacy and Medicine and Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, and clinical informaticist, Department of Clinical Informatics, UCHealth, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-7404
| | - P Michael Ho
- P.M. Ho is professor, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, and professor, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-6266
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- R.E. Glasgow is research professor, Department of Family Medicine, and director, Dissemination and Implementation Science Program, ACCORDS, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-3231
| | - Amy G Huebschmann
- A.G. Huebschmann is associate professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, ACCORDS and Ludeman Family Center for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-3142
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Maw AM, Morris MA, Glasgow RE, Barnard J, Ho PM, Ortiz-Lopez C, Fleshner M, Kramer HR, Grimm E, Ytell K, Gardner T, Huebschmann AG. Using Iterative RE-AIM to enhance hospitalist adoption of lung ultrasound in the management of patients with COVID-19: an implementation pilot study. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:89. [PMID: 35962441 PMCID: PMC9372925 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a clinician-performed evidence-based imaging modality that has multiple advantages in the evaluation of dyspnea caused by multiple disease processes, including COVID-19. Despite these advantages, few hospitalists have been trained to perform LUS. The aim of this study was to increase adoption and implementation of LUS during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic by using recurrent assessments of RE-AIM outcomes to iteratively revise our implementation strategies. METHODS In an academic hospital, we implemented guidelines for the use of LUS in patients with COVID-19 in July 2020. Using a novel "RE-AIM dashboard," we used an iterative process of evaluating the high-priority outcomes of Reach, Adoption, and Implementation at twice monthly intervals to inform revisions of our implementation strategies for LUS delivery (i.e., Iterative RE-AIM process). Using a convergent mixed methods design, we integrated quantitative RE-AIM outcomes with qualitative hospitalist interview data to understand the dynamic determinants of LUS Reach, Adoption, and Implementation. RESULTS Over the 1-year study period, 453 LUSs were performed in 298 of 12,567 eligible inpatients with COVID-19 (Reach = 2%). These 453 LUS were ordered by 43 out of 86 eligible hospitalists (LUS order adoption = 50%). However, the LUSs were performed/supervised by only 8 of these 86 hospitalists, 4 of whom were required to complete LUS credentialing as members of the hospitalist procedure service (proceduralist adoption 75% vs 1.2% non-procedural hospitalists adoption). Qualitative and quantitative data obtained to evaluate this Iterative RE-AIM process led to the deployment of six sequential implementation strategies and 3 key findings including (1) there were COVID-19-specific barriers to LUS adoption, (2) hospitalists were more willing to learn to make clinical decisions using LUS images than obtain the images themselves, and (3) mandating the credentialing of a strategically selected sub-group may be a successful strategy for improving Reach. CONCLUSIONS Mandating use of a strategically selected subset of clinicians may be an effective strategy for improving Reach of LUS. Additionally, use of Iterative RE-AIM allowed for timely adjustments to implementation strategies, facilitating higher levels of LUS Adoption and Reach. Future studies should explore the replicability of these preliminary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Maw
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
| | - Megan A Morris
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Juliana Barnard
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Carolina Ortiz-Lopez
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - Michelle Fleshner
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - Henry R Kramer
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - Eric Grimm
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - Kate Ytell
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Tiffany Gardner
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Amy G Huebschmann
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Anstett T, Smith C, Hess K, Patten L, Pincus S, Lin CT, Ho PM. Dig Deeper: A Case Report of Finding (and Fixing) the Root Cause of Add-On Laboratory Failures. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:874-879. [PMID: 35913087 PMCID: PMC9492320 DOI: 10.1055/a-1913-4158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venipunctures and the testing they facilitate are clinically necessary, particularly for hospitalized patients. However, excess venipunctures lead to patient harm, decreased patient satisfaction, and waste. OBJECTIVES We sought to identify contributors to excess venipunctures at our institution, focusing on electronic health record (EHR)-related factors. We then implemented and evaluated the impact of an intervention targeting one of the contributing factors. METHODS We employed the quality improvement (QI) methodology to find sources of excess venipunctures, specifically targeting add-on failures. Once an error was identified, we deployed an EHR-based intervention which was evaluated with retrospective pre- and postintervention analysis. RESULTS We identified an error in how the EHR evaluated the ability of laboratories across a health system to perform add-on tests to existing blood specimens. A review of 195,263 add-on orders placed prior to the intervention showed that 165,118 were successful and 30,145 failed, a failure rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.1-15.6). We implemented an EHR-based modification that changed the criteria for add-on testing from a health-system-wide query of laboratory capabilities to one that incorporated only the capabilities of laboratories with feasible access to existing patient samples. In the 6 months following the intervention, a review of 87,333 add-on orders showed that 77,310 were successful, and 10,023 add-on orders failed resulting in a postintervention failure rate of 11.4% (95% CI: 11.1, 11.8) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION EHR features such as the ability to identify possible add-on tests are designed to reduce venipunctures but may produce unforeseen negative effects on downstream processes, particularly as hospitals merge into health systems using a single EHR. This case report describes the successful identification and correction of one cause of add-on laboratory failures. QI methodology can yield important insights that reveal simple interventions for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Anstett
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Chris Smith
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
| | | | - Luke Patten
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Sharon Pincus
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Chen-Tan Lin
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ho PM, O’Donnell CI, McCreight M, Bavry AA, Bosworth HB, Girotra S, Grossman PM, Helfrich C, Latif F, Lu D, Matheny M, Mavromatis K, Ortiz J, Parashar A, Ratliff DM, Grunwald GK, Gillette M, Jneid H. Multifaceted Intervention to Improve P2Y12 Inhibitor Adherence After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Stepped Wedge Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e024342. [PMID: 35766258 PMCID: PMC9333389 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.024342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background P2Y12 inhibitor medications are critical following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, adherence remains suboptimal. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve P2Y12 inhibitor adherence following PCI. Methods and Results This was a modified stepped wedge trial of 52 eligible hospitals, of which 15 were randomly selected and agreed to participate (29 hospitals declined, and 8 eligible hospitals were not contacted). At each intervention hospital, patient recruitment occurred for 6 months and enrolled patients were followed up for 1 year after PCI. Three control groups were used: patients at intervention hospitals undergoing PCI (1) before the intervention period (preintervention); (2) after the intervention period (postintervention); or (3) at the 8 hospitals not contacted (concurrent controls). The intervention consisted of 4 components: (1) P2Y12 inhibitor delivered to patients' bedside after PCI; (2) education on importance of P2Y12 inhibitors; (3) automated reminder telephone calls to refill medication; and (4) outreach to patients if they delayed refilling P2Y12 inhibitor. The primary outcomes were as follows: (1) proportion of patients with delays filling P2Y12 inhibitor at hospital discharge and (2) proportion of patients who were adherent in the year after PCI using pharmacy refill data. Primary analysis compared intervention with preintervention control patients. There were 1377 (intent-to-treat) potentially eligible patients, of whom 803 (per protocol) were approached at intervention sites versus 5910 preintervention, 2807 postintervention, and 4736 concurrent control patients. In the intent-to-treat analysis, intervention patients were less likely to delay filling P2Y12 at hospital discharge (-3.4%; 98.3% CI, -1.2% to -5.6%) and more likely to be adherent to P2Y12 (4.1%; 98.3% CI, 1.0%-7.1%) at 1 year, but had more clinical events (3.2%; 98.3% CI, 2.3%-4.1%) driven by repeated PCI compared with preintervention patients. In post hoc analysis looking at myocardial infarction, stroke, and death, intervention patients had lower event rates compared with preintervention patients (-1.7%; 98.3% CI, -2.3% to -1.1%). Conclusions A 4-component intervention targeting P2Y12 inhibitor adherence was difficult to implement. The intervention produced mixed results. It improved P2Y12 adherence, but there was also an increase in repeat PCI. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01609842.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Michael Ho
- Cardiology SectionRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterAuroraCO,Department of MedicineUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraCO,Denver‐Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Driven CareRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterAuroraCO
| | | | - Marina McCreight
- Denver‐Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Driven CareRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterAuroraCO
| | | | - Hayden B. Bosworth
- Departments of Population Health Science, Medicine, Psychiatry, School of NursingDuke University School of MedicineDurhamNC,Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT)Durham VAMCDurhamNC
| | - Saket Girotra
- University of Iowa Carver College of MedicineIowa CityIA,Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical CenterIowa CityIA
| | | | - Christian Helfrich
- Seattle‐Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Driven CarePuget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWA
| | - Faisal Latif
- Oklahoma City VA Health Care SystemOklahoma CityOK,University of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma CityOK
| | - David Lu
- Washington DC VA Medical CenterWashingtonDC
| | - Michael Matheny
- Geriatric ResearchEducation, and Clinical Care CenterTennessee Valley Healthcare System VANashvilleTN,Department of Biomedical InformaticsVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTN
| | | | - Jose Ortiz
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare SystemClevelandOH
| | - Amitabh Parashar
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of MedicineRoanokeVA,Salem VA Medical CenterSalemVA
| | | | - Gary K. Grunwald
- Denver‐Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran Centered and Value Driven CareRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterAuroraCO,University of Colorado School of Public HealthAuroraCO
| | - Michael Gillette
- Baylor College of MedicineHoustonTX,Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical CenterHoustonTX
| | - Hani Jneid
- Baylor College of MedicineHoustonTX,Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical CenterHoustonTX
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kini V, Parks M, Liu W, Waldo SW, Ho PM, Bradley SM, Hess PL. Patient Symptoms and Stress Testing After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2217704. [PMID: 35727581 PMCID: PMC9214585 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Up to 60% of patients in the US receive a stress test within 2 years of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), prompting concerns about the possible overuse of stress testing. OBJECTIVE To examine the proportion of patients who underwent stress testing within 2 years of elective PCI, proportion of patients who had symptoms that were consistent with coronary artery disease (CAD), timing of stress testing, and site-level variation in stress testing among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used administrative claims data and clinical records from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking program. Patients who underwent stress testing within 2 years of elective PCI for stable CAD between November 1, 2013, and October 31, 2015, at 64 VA facilities were included in the analysis. Patients who received stress testing for staging purposes, cardiac rehabilitation evaluation, or preoperative testing before high-risk surgery were excluded. Data were analyzed from June to December 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was the proportion of patients who underwent stress testing and had symptoms that were consistent with obstructive CAD, using definitions from the 2013 clinical practice guideline (Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease). Secondary outcomes were the timing of stress testing (assessed using a cumulative incidence curve) and site-level variation in stress testing (assessed using multilevel logistic regression models). RESULTS A total of 3705 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age 66.3 [7.6] years; 3656 men [98.7%]; 437 Black individuals [11.8%], 3175 White individuals [85.7%], and 93 individuals [2.5%] of other races and ethnicities [Asian, Hispanic or Latinx, or unknown]) had elective PCI. Of these patients, 916 (24.7%) received a stress test within 2 years, among whom 730 (79.7%) had symptoms that were consistent with obstructive CAD at the time of stress testing. Visual inspection of a cumulative incidence curve for stress testing showed no rapid increases in stress testing at 6 months or 1 year after PCI, which might coincide with routine clinical visits. The proportion of symptomatic patients who underwent stress testing at each VA site ranged from 67.7% to 100%, with no significant site-level variation in stress testing. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study suggest that most veterans who underwent stress testing within 2 years after elective PCI had symptoms that were consistent with obstructive CAD. Therefore, measuring low-value stress testing using only administrative claims data may overestimate its prevalence, and concerns about overuse of post-PCI stress testing may be overstated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Kini
- Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Monica Parks
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Wenhui Liu
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora
- Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program, Veterans Health Administration Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Washington, DC
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora
| | | | - Paul L. Hess
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Parks
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (M.P., P.M.H.)
| | - Brahmajee Nallamothu
- University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center, CVC Cardiovascular Medicine (B.N.)
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (M.P., P.M.H.).,Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO (P.M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sacha GL, Kiser TH, Wright GC, Vandivier RW, Moss M, Burnham EL, Ho PM, Reynolds PM, Bauer SR. Association Between Vasopressin Rebranding and Utilization in Patients With Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:644-654. [PMID: 34605778 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Vasopressin is suggested as an adjunct to norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. However, after vasopressin was rebranded in November 2014, its cost exponentially increased. Utilization patterns of vasopressin after its rebranding are unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if there is an association between the rebranding of vasopressin in November 2014 and its utilization in vasopressor-dependent patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN Retrospective, multicenter, database study between January 2010 and March 2017. SETTING Premier Healthcare Database hospitals. PATIENTS Adult patients admitted to an ICU with severe sepsis or septic shock, who received at least one vasoactive agent for two or more calendar days were included. INTERVENTIONS The proportion of patients who received vasopressin and vasopressin cost was assessed before and after rebranding, and evaluated with segmented regression. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Among 294,733 patients (mean age, 66 ± 15 yr), 27.8% received vasopressin, and ICU mortality was 26.5%. The proportion of patients receiving vasopressin was higher after rebranding (31.2% postrebranding vs 25.8% prerebranding). Before vasopressin rebranding, the quarterly proportion of patients who received vasopressin had an increasing slope (prerebranding slope 0.41% [95% CI, 0.35-0.46%]), with no difference in slope detected after vasopressin rebranding (postrebranding slope, 0.47% [95% CI, 0.29-0.64%]). After vasopressin rebranding, mean vasopressin cost per patient was higher ($527 ± 1,130 vs $77 ± 160), and the quarterly slope of vasopressin cost was higher (change in slope $77.18 [95% CI, $75.73-78.61]). Total vasopressin billed cost postrebranding continually increased by ~$294,276 per quarter from less than $500,000 in Q4 2014 to over $3,000,000 in Q1 2017. CONCLUSIONS After vasopressin rebranding, utilization continued to increase quarterly despite a significant increase in vasopressin cost. Vasopressin appeared to have price inelastic demand in septic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyree H Kiser
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Garth C Wright
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - R William Vandivier
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Marc Moss
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Ellen L Burnham
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - P Michael Ho
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Paul M Reynolds
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Colorado Pulmonary Outcomes Research Group (CPOR), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Seth R Bauer
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kini V, Breathett K, Groeneveld PW, Ho PM, Nallamothu BK, Peterson PN, Rush P, Wang TY, Zeitler EP, Borden WB. Strategies to Reduce Low-Value Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2022; 15:e000105. [PMID: 35189687 PMCID: PMC9909614 DOI: 10.1161/hcq.0000000000000105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Low-value health care services that provide little or no benefit to patients are common, potentially harmful, and costly. Nearly half of the patients in the United States will receive at least 1 low-value test or procedure annually, creating risk of avoidable complications from subsequent cascades of care and excess costs to patients and society. Reducing low-value care is of particular importance to cardiovascular health given the high prevalence and costs of cardiovascular disease in the United States. This scientific statement describes the current scope and impact of low-value cardiovascular care; reviews existing literature on patient-, clinician-, health system-, payer-, and policy-level interventions to reduce low-value care; proposes solutions to achieve meaningful and equitable reductions in low-value care; and suggests areas for future research priorities.
Collapse
|
38
|
Leonard C, Kenney RR, Lee M, Greene P, Whittington M, Kirsh S, Ho PM, Sayre G, Simonetti J. Common Ground: Primary Care and Specialty Clinicians' Perceptions of E-Consults in the Veterans Health Administration. Fed Pract 2022; 39:42-47b. [PMID: 35185320 DOI: 10.12788/fp.0214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) introduced electronic consultation (e-consult) to increase access to specialty care. The objective of this study was to understand perceptions of e-consults that may be relevant to increasing adoption in the VA. Methods Deductive and inductive content analysis of semistructured qualitative telephone interviews with VA primary care practitioners (PCPs), specialists, and specialty division chiefs was performed. Participants were identified based on rates of e-consult in 2016 at the individual and facility level within primary care, hematology, cardiology, gastroenterology, and endocrinology. Interview guide development was informed by the Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability (PRISM) framework. Results We interviewed 35 PCPs and 25 specialists working in 36 facilities. Four themes emerged across both PCPs and specialists: (1) e-consults are best suited for certain types of clinical questions; (2) high-quality e-consults include complete background information from the requesting clinician and clear diagnostic or treatment recommendations from the responding clinician; (3) PCPs and specialists perceive e-consults as a novel opportunity to provide efficient, transparent care; and (4) lack of awareness of e-consults hinders adoption despite obvious benefits. Conclusions We identified themes that are informative for further adoption of high-quality e-consults in the VA. Educating PCPs and specialty practitioners about the benefits of e-consults, and providing support, such as lists of specialties available for e-consults at the facility are 2 such practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Leonard
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rachael R Kenney
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Marcie Lee
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Preston Greene
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
| | - Melanie Whittington
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Susan Kirsh
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Veteran Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC
| | - P Michael Ho
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, Colorado
| | - George Sayre
- Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joseph Simonetti
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Waldo SW, Glorioso TJ, Barón AE, Doll JA, Plomondon ME, Ho PM. Transitions of Care Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e024598. [PMID: 35156396 PMCID: PMC9245826 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.024598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background
Effective transitions from the procedural to outpatient setting are essential to ensure high‐quality cardiovascular care across health care systems, particularly among patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. We evaluated the association of postprocedural follow‐up visits and antiplatelet prescriptions with clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina at community or Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals.
Methods and Results
Patients who actively received care within the VA Healthcare System and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina at a community or VA hospital between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019, were identified. We compared mortality for patients receiving community or VA care, and among subgroups of community‐treated patients by the presence of a postprocedural follow‐up visit within 30 days or prescription for antiplatelet (P2Y12) medication within 120 days of the procedure. Among 12 837 patients who survived the first 30 days, 5133 were treated at community hospitals, and 7704 were treated in the VA. Prescriptions for antiplatelet therapy were less common for those treated in the community (85%) compared with the VA at 1 year (95%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.44–47). Compared with VA‐treated patients, the hazards for death were similar for patients treated in the community with a follow‐up visit (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.97–1.40) or with a fill for an antiplatelet therapy (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90–1.30). However, patients treated in the community without a follow‐up visit had an 86% (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.40–2.48) increased hazard of death, and those without antiplatelet prescription fill had a 144% increased hazard of death (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.85–3.21) compared with all VA‐treated patients.
Conclusions
Patients treated at community facilities have a decreased chance of receiving antiplatelet prescriptions after percutaneous coronary intervention with a concordant increased hazard of mortality, emphasizing the importance of transitions of care across health care systems when assessing cardiovascular quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen W. Waldo
- VHA Office of Quality and Patient Safety Washington DC
- Department of Medicine Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center Aurora CO
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO
| | | | - Anna E. Barón
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO
| | - Jacob A. Doll
- Puget Sound VA Medical Center Seattle WA
- Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA
| | | | - P. Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center Aurora CO
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Leppert MH, Burke JF, Lisabeth LD, Madsen TE, Kleindorfer DO, Sillau S, Schwamm LH, Daugherty SL, Bradley CJ, Ho PM, Poisson SN. Systematic Review of Sex Differences in Ischemic Strokes Among Young Adults: Are Young Women Disproportionately at Risk? Stroke 2022; 53:319-327. [PMID: 35073188 PMCID: PMC8852306 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.037117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recent evidence suggests that young women (18-45 years) may be at higher risk of ischemic strokes than men of the same age. The goal of this systematic review is to reconcile and synthesize existing evidence of sex differences among young adults with ischemic strokes. METHODS We searched PubMed from January 2008 to July 2021 for relevant articles and reviews and consulted their references. We included original studies that (1) were population based and (2) reported stroke incidence by sex or sex-specific incidence rate ratios of young adults ≤45 years. We excluded studies that (1) omitted measurements of error for incidence rates or incidence rate ratios, (2) omitted age adjustment, and (3) were not in English. Statistical synthesis was performed to estimate sex difference by age group (≤35, 35-45, and ≤45) and stroke type. RESULTS We found 19 studies that reported on sex-specific stroke incidence among young adults, including 3 that reported on overlapping data. Nine studies did not find a statistically significant sex difference among young adults ≤45 years. Three studies found higher rates of ischemic stroke among men among young adults ≥30 to 35 years. Four studies found more women with ischemic strokes among young adults ≤35 years. Overall, in young adults ≤35 years, the estimated effect size favored more ischemic strokes in women (incidence rate ratio, 1.44 [1.18-1.76], I2=82%) and a nonsignificant sex difference in young adults 35 to 45 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.08 [0.85-1.38], I2=95%). CONCLUSIONS Overall, there were 44% more women ≤35 years with ischemic strokes than men. This gap narrows in young adults, 35 to 45 years, and there is conflicting evidence whether more men or women have ischemic strokes in the 35 to 45 age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle H. Leppert
- Department of Neurology,University of Colorado School of Medicine,Aurora,CO,Corresponding Author:/919-906-2068/Twitter:@humich
| | - James F. Burke
- Department of Neurology,University of Michigan Health System,Ann Arbor,MI
| | - Lynda D. Lisabeth
- Department of Epidemiology,School of Public Health,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI
| | - Tracy E. Madsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine,Alpert Medical School of Brown University,Providence,RI
| | | | - Stefan Sillau
- Department of Neurology,University of Colorado School of Medicine,Aurora,CO
| | - Lee H. Schwamm
- Department of Neurology,Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston,MA
| | - Stacie L. Daugherty
- Division of Cardiology,University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,Aurora,CO
| | - Cathy J. Bradley
- Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center,University of Colorado,Aurora,CO
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology,University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,Aurora,CO
| | - Sharon N. Poisson
- Department of Neurology,University of Colorado School of Medicine,Aurora,CO
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Trivedi P, Jordan G, Ho PM. Leveraging Value-Based Payment Models to Reduce Health Inequities in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:143-145. [PMID: 35033302 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Premal Trivedi
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Gregory Jordan
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - P Michael Ho
- Veterans Administration - Eastern Colorado Health System, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Subramaniam S, Stryczek KC, Ball S, Stevenson L, Ho PM, Aron DC. Workforce Development to Improve Access to Pain Care for Veterans: A Qualitative Analysis of VA-ECHO Participant Experiences. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2022; 9:23333928221124806. [PMID: 36093259 PMCID: PMC9452798 DOI: 10.1177/23333928221124806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Objective The prevalence of chronic pain and its links to the opioid epidemic have given way to widespread aims to improve pain management care and reduce opioid use, especially in rural areas. Pain Management Specialty Care Access Network-Extension for Community Health Outcomes (VA-ECHO) promotes increased pain care access to rural Veterans through knowledge sharing from specialists to primary care providers (PCPs). We explored PCP participants’ experiences in VA-ECHO and pain management care. Methods This qualitative study is based on a descriptive secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 10) and 3 focus groups with PCPs participating in VA-ECHO from 2017–2019. A rapid matrix analysis approach was used to analyze participants’ responses. Results VA-ECHO was an effective workforce development strategy for meeting PCPs’ training needs by providing pain management knowledge and skills training (eg alternative care approaches and communicating treatment options). Having protected time to participate in VA-ECHO was a challenge for many PCPs, mitigated by leadership and administrative support. Participants who volunteer to participate had more positive experiences than those required to attend. Conclusions VA-ECHO could be used for meeting the workforce development needs of PCPs. Respondents were satisfied with the program citing improvement in their practice and increased confidence in providing pain management care to Veterans despite some challenges to participation. These findings offer insight into using VA-ECHO to meet the VHA’s workforce development to improve Veterans’ access to pain management care. The ECHO model presents opportunities for workforce development in large complex healthcare systems and garnering ongoing support for this training model is necessary for promoting workforce development for PCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sherry Ball
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - P. Michael Ho
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - David C. Aron
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mog AC, Moldestad M, Kenney R, Stevenson L, Lee M, Ho PM, Sayre GG. “I was Unsure at First”: A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Perceptions of VA Clinical Video Telehealth Visits in the V-IMPACT Program. J Patient Exp 2022; 9:23743735221107237. [PMID: 35813242 PMCID: PMC9260561 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221107237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Virtual Integrated Multi-Site Patient Aligned Care Team (V-IMPACT) was a Veterans Health
Administration (VHA) initiative created to increase access to primary care for Veterans
through Clinical Video Telehealth (CVT) appointments. Between January and August 2019, we
conducted 48 semi-structured qualitative interviews with Veterans who had a V-IMPACT
appointment. Many participants shared feelings of skepticism before their first
appointments but for some, their opinions changed. Veterans talked about how their opinion
of video care changed for the better when it made care more convenient or timelier or met
their health care needs. For some Veterans, their opinion about video care stayed the same
or worsened because they had a poor relationship or rapport with their provider, did not
feel like they received needed care, or did not feel like video care was useful. These
findings offer an opportunity for telecare providers to better understand and support
patients and to deliver effective care in the context of rapidly growing telehealth
modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley C Mog
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Megan Moldestad
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rachael Kenney
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Lauren Stevenson
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marcie Lee
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - George G Sayre
- The VA Collaborative Evaluation Center (VACE), Seattle, WA, Aurora, CO, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Levy AE, Whittington MD, Anstett TJ, Simon ST, Wentworth A, Carter JE, Ho PM. A Systems-Based Morbidity and Mortality Conference Was Associated With a Transient Reduction in ECG Completion Times. Qual Manag Health Care 2022; 31:28-33. [PMID: 34724456 PMCID: PMC9050961 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES During its monthly morbidity and mortality conference (MMC), the University of Colorado Division of Cardiology reviewed a "near-miss" patient safety event involving the delayed completion of a Stat-priority (ie, statim, meaning high priority) electrocardiogram (ECG). Because critical and interprofessional stakeholders participated in the conference, we hypothesized that the MMC would be associated with reduced ECG completion times. METHODS Data were collected for in-hospital ECGs performed at the University of Colorado Hospital between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018. An interrupted time series analysis was used to estimate the immediate and ongoing impact of the MMC (held on February 28, 2018) on ECG completion times, stratified by order priority (Stat, Now, or Routine). The percentage of delayed Stat-priority ECGs was analyzed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS Before the MMC, ECG completion times were stable for all order priorities ( P > .2), but the proportion of delayed Stat-priority ECGs increased from 5% in January 2017 to 20% in February 2018 ( P < .01). The MMC was associated with an immediate reduction in average daily ECG completion times for Routine (-18.4 minutes, P = .03) and Now (-8 minutes, P = .024) priority ECGs. No reduction was seen for Stat ECGs ( P = .97), though the percentage of delayed Stat ECGs stopped increasing ( P = .63). In the post-MMC period, completion times for Routine-priority ECGs increased and approached pre-MMC levels. CONCLUSIONS The MMC was associated with an immediate, but temporary, improvement in ECG completion times. Although the observed clinical benefit of the MMC is novel, these data support the need for more durable reforms to sustain initial improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew E. Levy
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - P. Michael Ho
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sandy LC, Glorioso TJ, Weinfurt K, Sugarman J, Peterson PN, Glasgow RE, Ho PM. Leave me out: Patients' characteristics and reasons for opting out of a pragmatic clinical trial involving medication adherence. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28136. [PMID: 34941059 PMCID: PMC8702195 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Opt-out procedures are sometimes used instead of standard consent practices to enable patients to exercise their autonomous preferences regarding research participation while reducing patient and researcher burden. However, little is known about the characteristics of patients who opt-out of research and their reasons for doing so. We gathered such information in a large pragmatic clinical trial (PCT) evaluating the effect of theory informed text messages on medication adherence.Eligible patients, identified through electronic health records, were sent information about the study and provided with an opportunity to opt-out. Those opting out were asked to complete a voluntary survey regarding their reasons for doing so. Demographic data were compared among patients opting-out vs those included in the study using chi-squared tests and a log binomial regression model.Of 9046 patients receiving study packets, 906 (10.0%) patients returned opt-out forms. Of those, 451 (49.8%) returned the opt-out survey. Patients who opted out were more likely to be older, white, and nonHispanic than those who were included in the PCT. Survey respondents expressed high levels of trust in their health care providers, research, and system. Nearly half (46.6%) reported concerns about time as a reason to opt-out.In this PCT, 10% of patients receiving packets opted out, with significant differences in age, race, gender, and ethnicity compared to those included. Future trials should further investigate representativeness and reasons patients choose to opt-out of participating in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Caputo Sandy
- General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- University of Colorado University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13199 E Montview Blvd, Suite 300 Aurora, CO
| | | | - Kevin Weinfurt
- Department of Population and Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pamela N. Peterson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - P. Michael Ho
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lauffenburger JC, Ho PM, Nallamothu BK. Finishing Touches: Enhancing Scientific Communication Through Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes' Technical Review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2021; 14:e008735. [PMID: 34932379 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.121.008735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie C Lauffenburger
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics and Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (JCL)
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, Denver Health Medical Center, CO (PNP)
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rao SS, Jensen AM, Kriss MS, Morgan RL, Ho PM, Ryu RK, Trivedi PS. Racial differences in use of endoscopy and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt creation for treatment of acute variceal bleeding in the United States. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 33:465-468.e1. [PMID: 34929343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sriram S Rao
- School of Medicine, University of California Irvine.
| | | | - Michael S Kriss
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO
| | - Rustain L Morgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO
| | - P Michael Ho
- Division of Cardiology, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora CO
| | - Robert K Ryu
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California
| | - Premal S Trivedi
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Waughtal J, Luong P, Sandy L, Chavez C, Ho PM, Bull S. Nudge me: tailoring text messages for prescription adherence through N-of-1 interviews. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:1832-1838. [PMID: 34080636 PMCID: PMC8686108 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Almost 50% of patients with cardiovascular diseases face challenges in taking medications and increased morbidity and mortality. Text messaging may impact medication refill behavior and can be delivered at scale to patients by texting mobile phones. To obtain feedback from persons with chronic conditions on the design of interactive text messages and determine language of message for making messages that can motivate patients to refill medications on time. We purposively sampled 35 English and Spanish speaking patients with at least one chronic condition from three large healthcare delivery systems to participate in N-of-1 video-based synchronous interviews. Research assistants shared ideas for theory-informed text messages with content intended to persuade patients to refill their medication. We transcribed recorded interviews and conducted a content analysis to identify strategies to employ generating a dynamic interactive text message library intended to increase medication refill. Those interviewed were of diverse age and race/ethnicity and typical of persons with multiple chronic conditions. Several participants emphasized that personally tailored and positively framed messages would be more persuasive than generic and/or negative messages. Some patients appreciated humor and messages that could evoke a sense of social support from their providers and rejected the use of emojis. Messages to remind patients to refill medications may facilitate improvements in adherence, which in turn can improve chronic care. Designing messages that are persuasive and can prompt action is feasible and should be considered given the ease with which such messages can be delivered automatically at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Waughtal
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Phat Luong
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lisa Sandy
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Catia Chavez
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
- Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System,
Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sheana Bull
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Richesson RL, Marsolo KS, Douthit BJ, Staman K, Ho PM, Dailey D, Boyd AD, McTigue KM, Ezenwa MO, Schlaeger JM, Patil CL, Faurot KR, Tuzzio L, Larson EB, O'Brien EC, Zigler CK, Lakin JR, Pressman AR, Braciszewski JM, Grudzen C, Fiol GD. Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2626-2640. [PMID: 34597383 PMCID: PMC8633608 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We identified challenges and solutions to using electronic health record (EHR) systems for the design and conduct of pragmatic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 2012, the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory has served as the resource coordinating center for 21 pragmatic clinical trial demonstration projects. The EHR Core working group invited these demonstration projects to complete a written semistructured survey and used an inductive approach to review responses and identify EHR-related challenges and suggested EHR enhancements. RESULTS We received survey responses from 20 projects and identified 21 challenges that fell into 6 broad themes: (1) inadequate collection of patient-reported outcome data, (2) lack of structured data collection, (3) data standardization, (4) resources to support customization of EHRs, (5) difficulties aggregating data across sites, and (6) accessing EHR data. DISCUSSION Based on these findings, we formulated 6 prerequisites for PCTs that would enable the conduct of pragmatic research: (1) integrate the collection of patient-centered data into EHR systems, (2) facilitate structured research data collection by leveraging standard EHR functions, usable interfaces, and standard workflows, (3) support the creation of high-quality research data by using standards, (4) ensure adequate IT staff to support embedded research, (5) create aggregate, multidata type resources for multisite trials, and (6) create re-usable and automated queries. CONCLUSION We are hopeful our collection of specific EHR challenges and research needs will drive health system leaders, policymakers, and EHR designers to support these suggestions to improve our national capacity for generating real-world evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Richesson
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Keith S Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian J Douthit
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,US Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Karen Staman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Dana Dailey
- Center for Health Sciences, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa and Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andrew D Boyd
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kathleen M McTigue
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Miriam O Ezenwa
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Judith M Schlaeger
- Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Crystal L Patil
- Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keturah R Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah Tuzzio
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Emily C O'Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christina K Zigler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Palliative Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alice R Pressman
- Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health Center for Health Systems Research, Walnut Creek, California, USA
| | - Jordan M Braciszewski
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Corita Grudzen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Trivedi PS, Jensen AM, Brown MA, Morgan RL, Lindrooth RC, Ryu RK, Ho PM, Kriss MS. High Prevalence of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation Without Prior Endoscopy During Acute Variceal Bleeding Hospitalization in the United States. Hepatol Commun 2021; 5:1784-1790. [PMID: 34558832 PMCID: PMC8485889 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Current clinical guidelines by both American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and European Association for the Study of the Liver recommend endoscopy in all patients admitted with acute variceal bleeding within 12 hours of admission. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation may be considered in patients at high risk if hemorrhage cannot be controlled endoscopically. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to assess how frequently TIPS is created for acute variceal bleeding in the United States without preceding endoscopy. Adult patients undergoing TIPS creation for acute variceal bleeding in the United States (n = 6,297) were identified in the last 10 available years (2007-2016) of the National Inpatient Sample. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between endoscopy nonutilization and hospital characteristics, controlling for patient demographics, income level, insurance type, and disease severity. Of 6,297 discharges following TIPS creation for acute variceal bleeding in the United States, 31% (n = 1,924) did not receive first-line endoscopy during the same encounter. Rates of "no endoscopy" decreased with increasing population density of the hospital county (nonmicropolitan counties 43%, n = 114; mid-size metropolitan county 35%, n = 513; and central county with >1 million population 23%, n = 527) but not by hospital teaching status (n = 1,465, 32% teaching vs. n = 430, 26% nonteaching; P = 0.10). Higher disease mortality risk (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.80; P = 0.02) was associated with lower odds of noncompliance. Conclusion: One third of all patients undergoing TIPS creation for acute variceal bleeding in the United States do not receive first-line endoscopy during the same encounter. Patients admitted to urban hospitals are more likely to receive guideline-concordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Premal S Trivedi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional RadiologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCOUSA
| | | | - Matthew A Brown
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional RadiologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCOUSA
| | - Rustain L Morgan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional RadiologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCOUSA
| | | | - Robert K Ryu
- University of Southern California Keck School of MedicineLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - P Michael Ho
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health SystemAuroraCOUSA
| | - Michael S Kriss
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCOUSA
| |
Collapse
|