1
|
Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke N, Cross W, Gillessen S, Amos C, Brawley C, Jones R, Pezaro C, Malik Z, Montazeri A, Millman R, Cook A, Gilbert D, Langley R, Parker C, Sydes M, Brown L, Parmar M, James N. LBA62 Comparison of abiraterone acetate and prednisolone (AAP) or combination enzalutamide (ENZ) + AAP for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): Overall survival (OS) results of 2 randomised phase III trials from the STAMPEDE protocol. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
2
|
Clarke NW, Ali A, Ingleby FC, Hoyle A, Amos CL, Attard G, Brawley CD, Calvert J, Chowdhury S, Cook A, Cross W, Dearnaley DP, Douis H, Gilbert D, Gillessen S, Jones RJ, Langley RE, MacNair A, Malik Z, Mason MD, Matheson D, Millman R, Parker CC, Ritchie AWS, Rush H, Russell JM, Brown J, Beesley S, Birtle A, Capaldi L, Gale J, Gibbs S, Lydon A, Nikapota A, Omlin A, O'Sullivan JM, Parikh O, Protheroe A, Rudman S, Srihari NN, Simms M, Tanguay JS, Tolan S, Wagstaff J, Wallace J, Wylie J, Zarkar A, Sydes MR, Parmar MKB, James ND. Corrigendum to Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- and high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial: Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 1992-2003. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:442. [PMID: 32067690 PMCID: PMC8929236 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N W Clarke
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester.
| | - A Ali
- Genito-Urinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester
| | - F C Ingleby
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London
| | - A Hoyle
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester
| | - C L Amos
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | | | - C D Brawley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - J Calvert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - S Chowdhury
- Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - A Cook
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - W Cross
- St James University Hospital, Leeds
| | | | - H Douis
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham
| | - D Gilbert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester
| | - R J Jones
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - R E Langley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - A MacNair
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - Z Malik
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | | | - D Matheson
- Faculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton
| | - R Millman
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - C C Parker
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton-London; RoyalMarsden NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - A W S Ritchie
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - H Rush
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - J M Russell
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow
| | - J Brown
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | | | - A Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston
| | - L Capaldi
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester
| | - J Gale
- Portsmouth Oncology Centre, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth
| | | | - A Lydon
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torbay
| | | | - A Omlin
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - J M O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - O Parikh
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - A Protheroe
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Rudman
- Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - N N Srihari
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - M Simms
- Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | | | - S Tolan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | - J Wagstaff
- Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea, UK
| | - J Wallace
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - J Wylie
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Zarkar
- Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - M K B Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - N D James
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clarke NW, Ali A, Ingleby FC, Hoyle A, Amos CL, Attard G, Brawley CD, Calvert J, Chowdhury S, Cook A, Cross W, Dearnaley DP, Douis H, Gilbert D, Gillessen S, Jones RJ, Langley RE, MacNair A, Malik Z, Mason MD, Matheson D, Millman R, Parker CC, Ritchie AWS, Rush H, Russell JM, Brown J, Beesley S, Birtle A, Capaldi L, Gale J, Gibbs S, Lydon A, Nikapota A, Omlin A, O'Sullivan JM, Parikh O, Protheroe A, Rudman S, Srihari NN, Simms M, Tanguay JS, Tolan S, Wagstaff J, Wallace J, Wylie J, Zarkar A, Sydes MR, Parmar MKB, James ND. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- and high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1992-2003. [PMID: 31560068 PMCID: PMC6938598 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND STAMPEDE has previously reported that the use of upfront docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer patients starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We report on long-term outcomes stratified by metastatic burden for M1 patients. METHODS We randomly allocated patients in 2 : 1 ratio to standard-of-care (SOC; control group) or SOC + docetaxel. Metastatic disease burden was categorised using retrospectively-collected baseline staging scans where available. Analysis used Cox regression models, adjusted for stratification factors, with emphasis on restricted mean survival time where hazards were non-proportional. RESULTS Between 05 October 2005 and 31 March 2013, 1086 M1 patients were randomised to receive SOC (n = 724) or SOC + docetaxel (n = 362). Metastatic burden was assessable for 830/1086 (76%) patients; 362 (44%) had low and 468 (56%) high metastatic burden. Median follow-up was 78.2 months. There were 494 deaths on SOC (41% more than the previous report). There was good evidence of benefit of docetaxel over SOC on OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95, P = 0.009) with no evidence of heterogeneity of docetaxel effect between metastatic burden sub-groups (interaction P = 0.827). Analysis of other outcomes found evidence of benefit for docetaxel over SOC in failure-free survival (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.81, P < 0.001) with no evidence of heterogeneity of docetaxel effect between metastatic burden sub-groups (interaction P > 0.5 in each case). There was no evidence that docetaxel resulted in late toxicity compared with SOC: after 1 year, G3-5 toxicity was reported for 28% SOC and 27% docetaxel (in patients still on follow-up at 1 year without prior progression). CONCLUSIONS The clinically significant benefit in survival for upfront docetaxel persists at longer follow-up, with no evidence that benefit differed by metastatic burden. We advocate that upfront docetaxel is considered for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer patients regardless of metastatic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N W Clarke
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester.
| | - A Ali
- Genito-Urinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester
| | - F C Ingleby
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London
| | - A Hoyle
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester
| | - C L Amos
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | | | - C D Brawley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - J Calvert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - S Chowdhury
- Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - A Cook
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - W Cross
- St James University Hospital, Leeds
| | | | - H Douis
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham
| | - D Gilbert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester
| | - R J Jones
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - R E Langley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - A MacNair
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - Z Malik
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | | | - D Matheson
- Faculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton
| | - R Millman
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - C C Parker
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton-London; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - A W S Ritchie
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - H Rush
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - J M Russell
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow
| | - J Brown
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | | | - A Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston
| | - L Capaldi
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester
| | - J Gale
- Portsmouth Oncology Centre, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth
| | | | - A Lydon
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torbay
| | | | - A Omlin
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - J M O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast
| | - O Parikh
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn
| | - A Protheroe
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford
| | - S Rudman
- Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - N N Srihari
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury
| | - M Simms
- Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull
| | | | - S Tolan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | - J Wagstaff
- Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea
| | - J Wallace
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - J Wylie
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | | | - M R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - M K B Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London
| | - N D James
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clarke N, Ali A, Ingleby F, Hoyle A, Calvert J, Attard G, Chowdhury S, Dearnaley D, Douis H, Gillessen S, Jones R, Malik Z, Mason M, Millman R, Parker C, Rush H, Omlin A, Sydes M, Parmar M, James N. Docetaxel for hormone-naïve prostate cancer: Results from long-term follow-up of metastatic (M1) patients in the STAMPEDE randomised trial (NCT00268476) and sub-group analysis by metastatic burden. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz248.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
5
|
Parker C, James N, Brawley C, Clarke N, Attard G, Chowdhury S, Cross W, Dearnaley D, Gilson C, Jones R, Mason M, Millman R, Gillessen S, Eswar C, Gale J, Lester J, Sheehan D, Tran A, Parmar M, Sydes M. Radiotherapy (RT) to the primary tumour for men with newly-diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (PCa): Survival results from STAMPEDE. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
6
|
Bublitz MH, Carpenter M, Amin S, Okun ML, Millman R, De La Monte SM, Bourjeily G. The role of inflammation in the association between gestational diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea: A pilot study. Obstet Med 2018; 11:186-191. [PMID: 30574181 DOI: 10.1177/1753495x18780095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes. Mechanisms underlying the association between obstructive sleep apnea and gestational diabetes remain to be elucidated. Methods Twenty-three participants with gestational diabetes underwent home sleep apnea testing. Obstructive sleep apnea was defined as an apnea hypopnea index > 5. Fasting morning blood samples were measured using multianalyte profiling (xMAP) multiplexed bead array immunoassay for Interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and Interleukin 8. Results Age, body mass index, and gestational age at enrollment were 31 + 4.4 years, 35.7 + 7.4 kg/m2, and 28 ± 4 weeks, respectively. Participants were 52% Caucasian and 16% had obstructive sleep apnea. We observed positive correlations between apnea hypopnea index and Interleukin 6 (r = 0.62, p = 0.005), Interleukin 8 (r = 0.56, p = .56), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (r = .58, p = .009). Women with obstructive sleep apnea had higher levels of Interleukin 6 (F = 5.01, p = .037) and Interleukin 8 (F = 6.33, p = .021) vs. women without obstructive sleep apnea. Conclusion These preliminary results indicate that in women with gestational diabetes, apnea hypopnea index is associated with an elevated inflammatory profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Bublitz
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, USA.,Women's Medicine Collaborative of Lifespan, Providence, USA
| | - M Carpenter
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, USA.,Women's Medicine Collaborative of Lifespan, Providence, USA
| | - S Amin
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA
| | - M L Okun
- Lane Center for Academic Health Sciences, Clinical and Biobehavioral Research, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, USA
| | - R Millman
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.,Sleep Disorders Center of Lifespan Hospitals, Providence, USA
| | - S M De La Monte
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.,Department of Pathology (Neuropathology), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA
| | - G Bourjeily
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, USA.,Women's Medicine Collaborative of Lifespan, Providence, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sydes MR, Spears MR, Mason MD, Clarke NW, Dearnaley DP, de Bono JS, Attard G, Chowdhury S, Cross W, Gillessen S, Malik ZI, Jones R, Parker CC, Ritchie AWS, Russell JM, Millman R, Matheson D, Amos C, Gilson C, Birtle A, Brock S, Capaldi L, Chakraborti P, Choudhury A, Evans L, Ford D, Gale J, Gibbs S, Gilbert DC, Hughes R, McLaren D, Lester JF, Nikapota A, O'Sullivan J, Parikh O, Peedell C, Protheroe A, Rudman SM, Shaffer R, Sheehan D, Simms M, Srihari N, Strebel R, Sundar S, Tolan S, Tsang D, Varughese M, Wagstaff J, Parmar MKB, James ND. Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1235-1248. [PMID: 29529169 PMCID: PMC5961425 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adding abiraterone acetate with prednisolone (AAP) or docetaxel with prednisolone (DocP) to standard-of-care (SOC) each improved survival in systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: evaluation of drug efficacy: a multi-arm multi-stage platform randomised controlled protocol recruiting patients with high-risk locally advanced or metastatic PCa starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The protocol provides the only direct, randomised comparative data of SOC + AAP versus SOC + DocP. Method Recruitment to SOC + DocP and SOC + AAP overlapped November 2011 to March 2013. SOC was long-term ADT or, for most non-metastatic cases, ADT for ≥2 years and RT to the primary tumour. Stratified randomisation allocated pts 2 : 1 : 2 to SOC; SOC + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 3-weekly×6 + prednisolone 10 mg daily; or SOC + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg + prednisolone 5 mg daily. AAP duration depended on stage and intent to give radical RT. The primary outcome measure was death from any cause. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. This was not a formally powered comparison. A hazard ratio (HR) <1 favours SOC + AAP, and HR > 1 favours SOC + DocP. Results A total of 566 consenting patients were contemporaneously randomised: 189 SOC + DocP and 377 SOC + AAP. The patients, balanced by allocated treatment were: 342 (60%) M1; 429 (76%) Gleason 8-10; 449 (79%) WHO performance status 0; median age 66 years and median PSA 56 ng/ml. With median follow-up 4 years, 149 deaths were reported. For overall survival, HR = 1.16 (95% CI 0.82-1.65); failure-free survival HR = 0.51 (95% CI 0.39-0.67); progression-free survival HR = 0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.88); metastasis-free survival HR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.03); prostate cancer-specific survival HR = 1.02 (0.70-1.49); and symptomatic skeletal events HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.55-1.25). In the safety population, the proportion reporting ≥1 grade 3, 4 or 5 adverse events ever was 36%, 13% and 1% SOC + DocP, and 40%, 7% and 1% SOC + AAP; prevalence 11% at 1 and 2 years on both arms. Relapse treatment patterns varied by arm. Conclusions This direct, randomised comparative analysis of two new treatment standards for hormone-naïve prostate cancer showed no evidence of a difference in overall or prostate cancer-specific survival, nor in other important outcomes such as symptomatic skeletal events. Worst toxicity grade over entire time on trial was similar but comprised different toxicities in line with the known properties of the drugs. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00268476.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London.
| | | | | | - N W Clarke
- Christie and Royal Salford Hospital, Manchester
| | | | | | - G Attard
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London
| | - S Chowdhury
- Guy's & St Thomas NHS, Foundation Trust, London
| | - W Cross
- St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen; University of Bern, Bern; Swiss Group for Cancer Clinical Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Z I Malik
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - C C Parker
- Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton
| | | | - J M Russell
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - R Millman
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London
| | - D Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton
| | - C Amos
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London
| | - C Gilson
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London
| | - A Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston
| | - S Brock
- Dorset Cancer Centre, Poole Hospital, Poole
| | - L Capaldi
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester
| | | | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester; Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | - L Evans
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield
| | - D Ford
- City Hospital, Cancer Centre at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham
| | - J Gale
- Portsmouth Oncology Centre, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth
| | | | - D C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton
| | - R Hughes
- Mount Vernon Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex
| | | | | | | | - J O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast; Belfast City Hospital, Belfast
| | - O Parikh
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston
| | - C Peedell
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, South Tees NHS Trust, Middlesbrough
| | - A Protheroe
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S M Rudman
- Guy's & St Thomas NHS, Foundation Trust, London
| | - R Shaffer
- Department of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford
| | - D Sheehan
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter
| | - M Simms
- Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull
| | - N Srihari
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - R Strebel
- Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur; Swiss Group for Cancer Clinical Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Sundar
- Department of Oncology, Nottingham, University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham
| | - S Tolan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | - D Tsang
- Southend Hospital, Southend-on-Sea
| | - M Varughese
- Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Wagstaff
- Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea
| | | | - N D James
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sydes M, Mason M, Spears M, Clarke N, Dearnaley D, Ritchie A, Russell M, Gilson C, Jones R, de Bono J, Gillessen S, Millman R, Tolan S, Wagstaff J, Chowdhury S, Lester J, Sheehan D, Gale J, Parmar M, James N. Adding abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP) or docetaxel for patients (pts) with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): Directly randomised data from STAMPEDE (NCT00268476). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
9
|
James N, Sydes M, Mason M, Clarke N, Dearnaley D, Spears M, Millman R, Parker C, Ritchie A, Russell J, Staffurth J, Jones R, Cathomas R, Robinson A, Chowdhury S, Tsang D, Brock S, Parikh O, Graham J, Parmar M. 19LBA Docetaxel (Doc) +/− zoledronic acid (ZA) for hormone-naive prostate cancer: First overall survival results from STAMPEDE & treatment effects within subgroups (NCT00268476). Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(15)30073-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
James N, Clarke N, Mason M, Spears M, Aebersold D, Dearnaley D, De Bono J, Millman R, Parker C, Parmar M, Ritchie A, Russell M, Thalmann G, Sydes M. O9 Survival with newly-diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the “docetaxel era”: Data from around 700 patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial (NCT00268476). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(13)62329-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
The concepts of meridians and acupoints are critical to traditional Chinese medicine but are met with skepticism in Western medicine. Empirical validation of these concepts is in its beginning stages and still hampered by problems with measurement. A promising avenue and foundation for validity testing is the demonstration that acupoint activity can be reliably measured via determination of electrical resistance at well-defined body surface points. In this article, efforts are described to maximize measurement reliability; we tested a variety of protocols to determine which method of data aggregation is associated with maximal reliability. Twenty-one healthy individuals were subjected to 5 repeated measurement cycles to test the predicted increase in reliability with increasing number of aggregated measurements. Reliability, defined as internal consistency, was indeed highest for 5 measurements (mean alpha = .88). Even the aggregate of only three measures was quite reliable (alpha = .84). Reliability for measuring acupoints on the left side of the body was roughly .05 higher than on the right side. Consistent with previous literature, we conclude that with repeated measures the reliability of electrical resistance measurements at acupoints is high and that a strong foundation for validation research is now laid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Turner
- Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Emmons KM, Goldstein MG, Roberts M, Cargill B, Sherman CB, Millman R, Brown R, Abrams DB. The use of nicotine replacement therapy during hospitalization. Ann Behav Med 2001; 22:325-9. [PMID: 11253444 DOI: 10.1007/bf02895669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent findings suggest that smokers who are hospitalized experience significant craving for cigarettes. Thus, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may be a particularly important tool for use during hospitalization. The goal of this study is to evaluate the utilization of the transdermal nicotine patch and/or nicotine gum by hospitalized smokers. The data represented in this article are from 580 smokers who participated in a study of a motivational intervention for smoking cessation that was delivered during hospitalization. The primary outcome for this analysis was use of NRT during hospitalization. The results revealed that, among the entire sample, only 7.1% of the overall sample used NRT during hospitalization; 6% of the hospitalized smokers used the transdermal nicotine patch, and 1.1% used nicotine gum. Use of NRT was significantly greater among patients who reported that they were doing anything to help themselves quit smoking at the time of admission (OR = 4.1), those who were seriously planning to quit smoking within the next 30 days (OR = 2.36), those who were nicotine dependent (OR = 2.81), and those for whom a physician had ever offered to prescribe NRT (OR = 1.9). The finding that there is a very low rate of NRT use during hospitalization provides important information to hospital-based care providers and smoking cessation intervention planners. Barriers to NRT use among hospitalized patients should be identified, and strategies designed to maximize use when appropriate. The AHCPR Guideline on Smoking Cessation recommends routine use of NRT in health care settings. Further research is needed to determine why NRT use was so low. In addition, these data suggest that efforts to increase NRT use during hospitalization are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Emmons
- Miriam Hospital and Brown University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rosen R, Mahowald M, Chesson A, Doghramji K, Goldberg R, Moline M, Millman R, Zammit G, Mark B, Dement W. The Taskforce 2000 survey on medical education in sleep and sleep disorders. Sleep 1998; 21:235-8. [PMID: 9595601 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/21.3.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous research has shown evidence of a widening gap between scientific research and clinical teaching in sleep and sleep disorders. To address the deficiencies in current medical education in sleep, the Taskforce 2000 was established by the American Sleep Disorders Association. The present study was undertaken to assess the teaching activities, needs and interests of the membership of the two largest professional sleep societies (American Sleep Disorders Association and Sleep Research Society). Survey instruments included a brief, 5-item postcard survey, which was mailed to all members, followed by an in-depth, 34-item questionnaire, which was completed by 158 respondents from the intitial postcard survey (N = 808). Results indicated that the majority of respondents (65.2%) are currently involved in teaching sleep to medical students or postgraduate trainees, although the average amount of teaching time was only 2.1 hours for undergraduate and 4.8 hours for graduate education in sleep. Teaching of sleep laboratory procedures and clinical evaluation of sleep-disordered patients is limited at either an undergraduate or postgraduate level. The major deficiencies noted were the lack of time in the medical curriculum and the need for better resources and teaching facilities. A large majority of respondents indicated their willingness to be involved in sleep education for physicians, and rated this a high priority for the professional organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rosen
- Comprehensive Sleep Disorders Center, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ferber R, Millman R, Coppola M, Fleetham J, Murray CF, Iber C, McCall WV, Nino-Murcia G, Pressman M, Sanders M. Portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. ASDA standards of practice. Sleep 1994; 17:378-92. [PMID: 7973323 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/17.4.378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective assessment of patients with a presumptive diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has primarily used attended polysomnographic study. Recent technologic advances and issues of availability, convenience and cost have led to a rapid increase in the use of portable recording devices. However, limited scientific information has been published regarding the evaluation of the efficacy, accuracy, validity, utility, cost effectiveness and limitations of this portable equipment. Attaining a clear assessment of the role of portable devices is complicated by the multiplicity of recording systems and the variability of clinical settings in which they have been analyzed. This paper reviews the current knowledge base regarding portable recording in the assessment of OSA, including technical considerations, validation studies, potential advantages and disadvantages, issues of safety, current clinical usage and areas most in need of further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ferber
- Standards of Practice Committee, American Sleep Disorders Association, Rochester, MN 55901-2200
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Taylor CE, Craft AW, Kernahan J, Millman R, Reid MM, Scott R, Toms GL. Local antibody production and respiratory syncytial virus infection in children with leukaemia. J Med Virol 1990; 30:277-81. [PMID: 2370522 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.1890300409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Children undergoing therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) are at increased risk of severe viral respiratory infection, and some find it difficult to terminate virus secretion. This increased severity may result from a defect in the mucosal immune response. To test this hypothesis, nasal immunoglobulin secretion and specific antiviral antibody responses to infection with respiratory syncytial (RS) virus in children with ALL have been compared with those in a normal age-matched comparison group. Children with leukaemia secreted normal levels of IgA and slightly raised IgM levels. IgG levels were depressed. Following RS virus infection, the majority of children with leukaemia secreted normal amounts of IgA and IgG nasal antibody and successfully cleared the virus. However, three of the 13 children studied made poor or undetectable nasal antibody responses, which correlated with their inability to clear the virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Taylor
- Department of Child Health, Royal Victoria Infirmary, England
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tardiff K, Gross E, Wu J, Stajic M, Millman R. Analysis of cocaine-positive fatalities. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34:53-63. [PMID: 2918288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
A review of all autopsy and toxicology reports for persons dying in New York City in an 11-month period found 935 persons dying with cocaine in their bodies. Cocaine-positive fatalities were more likely in the young black and Hispanic and male population. In addition to cocaine and its metabolites, heroin and other opiates were found in 39% of persons and ethanol in 33% and barbiturates and minor tranquilizers in only 2% of the deceased. Cocaine overdose was responsible for 4% of the deaths and overdose with heroin and cocaine for 12% of the deaths. Violence was often the cause of death. Thirty-eight percent died of homicide, seven percent of suicide, and eight percent from accidents. Of particular interest were 6 persons who died of acute cardiac events directly related to cocaine as well as 4 cases of ruptured dissections of the ascending aorta, and 9 cases of cerebral hemorrhage. Autopsy findings for these individuals are described, and possible mechanisms of death are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Tardiff
- New York University School of Medicine, NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miller NS, Gold MS, Millman R. PCP: a dangerous drug. Am Fam Physician 1988; 38:215-8. [PMID: 3046273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PCP is again becoming a popular drug of abuse in the United States, particularly among the young. A variety of medical, psychiatric and pathologic effects make PCP both appealing and profoundly dangerous to naive and chronic drug users. Pharmacologic intervention is helpful in PCP-induced acute intoxication and psychosis. Effective long-term treatment is available in addiction programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Miller
- New York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center, White Plains
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Keeley KA, Galanter M, Millman R, Jackson G. Clinical fellowships in substance abuse: a new curriculum strategy. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1980; 7:49-56. [PMID: 7435482 DOI: 10.3109/00952998009028409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Recognizing the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment is made easier when there is a steady supply of newly trained medical professionals who are competent in this specialty. University-based substance abuse treatment facilities have a clear obligation to educate such professionals. This article shows how three different medical colleges were able to establish new clinical fellowships in substance abuse so that teaching activities could be fostered at preexisting treatment sites. Fellowship activities varied from one place to the next, but at all three schools important momentum was generated on behalf of substance abuse education. These experiences provide models for those academicians and administrators who face the task of integrating educational and serivce delivery missions in the substance abuse field.
Collapse
|