Howe R, Mirakian RM, Pillai P, Gane S, Darby YC, Scadding GK. Audit of nasal lysine aspirin therapy in recalcitrant aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease.
World Allergy Organ J 2014;
7:18. [PMID:
25097720 PMCID:
PMC4114086 DOI:
10.1186/1939-4551-7-18]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Aspirin – exacerbated respiratory disease can prove difficult to control. Oral aspirin desensitization is effective, but has adverse effects and may not be cardio-protective at the high doses needed.
Objective
To examine the effectiveness of aspirin administered in lower doses via the nose.
Methods
An audit of 121 patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), 105 of whom were treated with intranasal lysine aspirin in gradually increasing doses following positive lysine aspirin challenge.
Results
Treatment was associated with subjective symptomatic improvement or stabilization in 60 of 78 patients at 3 months and 19 of 27 at 12 months. Nasal inspiratory peak flow, olfaction, exhaled and nasal nitric oxide levels were significantly improved (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with positive skin prick tests and those with later onset (>40 years) AERD improved more than non-atopics and those with early onset AERD.
Asthma outcomes over 1 year were assessed by questionnaire in 22 patients on lysine aspirin and in 20 who were positive on challenge but who either refused treatment or took it only briefly (less than or equal to 3 months). There was a significant decrease in emergency visits (p = 0.0182), hospitalization (p = 0.0074) and oral steroid use (p = 0.004) in those on nasal lysine aspirin for a year.
Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 3.8%, lower than those reported for oral aspirin therapy. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance This form of therapy might reduce the need for expensive monoclonal antibodies in AERD patients.
Collapse