1
|
Stackhouse CT, Anderson JC, Yue Z, Nguyen T, Eustace NJ, Langford CP, Wang J, Rowland JR, Xing C, Mikhail FM, Cui X, Alrefai H, Bash RE, Lee KJ, Yang ES, Hjelmeland AB, Miller CR, Chen JY, Gillespie GY, Willey CD. An in vivo model of glioblastoma radiation resistance identifies long non-coding RNAs and targetable kinases. JCI Insight 2022; 7:148717. [PMID: 35852875 PMCID: PMC9462495 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.148717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Key molecular regulators of acquired radiation resistance in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) are largely unknown, with a dearth of accurate preclinical models. To address this, we generated 8 GBM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of acquired radiation therapy–selected (RTS) resistance compared with same-patient, treatment-naive (radiation-sensitive, unselected; RTU) PDXs. These likely unique models mimic the longitudinal evolution of patient recurrent tumors following serial radiation therapy. Indeed, while whole-exome sequencing showed retention of major genomic alterations in the RTS lines, we did detect a chromosome 12q14 amplification that was associated with clinical GBM recurrence in 2 RTS models. A potentially novel bioinformatics pipeline was applied to analyze phenotypic, transcriptomic, and kinomic alterations, which identified long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and targetable, PDX-specific kinases. We observed differential transcriptional enrichment of DNA damage repair pathways in our RTS models, which correlated with several lncRNAs. Global kinomic profiling separated RTU and RTS models, but pairwise analyses indicated that there are multiple molecular routes to acquired radiation resistance. RTS model–specific kinases were identified and targeted with clinically relevant small molecule inhibitors. This cohort of in vivo RTS patient-derived models will enable future preclinical therapeutic testing to help overcome the treatment resistance seen in patients with GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zongliang Yue
- Informatics Institute, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Thanh Nguyen
- Informatics Institute, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | | - Jelai Wang
- Informatics Institute, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - James R. Rowland
- Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Fady M. Mikhail
- Department of Genetics, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Xiangqin Cui
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Ryan E. Bash
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, and
| | | | | | - Anita B. Hjelmeland
- Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - C. Ryan Miller
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, and
| | - Jake Y. Chen
- Informatics Institute, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shelton AK, Smithberger E, Butler M, Stamper A, Bash RE, Angus SP, East MP, Johnson GL, Berens ME, Furnari FB, Miller R. Abstract 3248: Acquired resistance to targeted inhibitors in EGFR-driven glioblastoma: Identification of dual kinase targets. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-3248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating primary brain tumor with <5% 5-year survival. CDKN2A deletion (~60%) and EGFR amplification (~55%) mutations frequently co-occur in these tumors. EGFR is an attractive therapeutic target due to its mutational frequency and availability of brain-penetrant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Several EGFR TKI have failed clinically, due in part to acquired resistance. To mechanistically examine this type of resistance, we used a panel of ten genetically engineered mouse astrocyte lines harboring Cdkn2a deletion and EGFRvIII, a common (~30%) activating mutation. Resistant cells were generated via long-term exposure to gefitinib or erlotinib, either in vitro or in vivo. Both transcriptomic (RNAseq) and proteomic (multiplexed inhibitor beads with mass spectrometry, MIB-MS) experiments showed that cell lines clustered primarily by resistance phenotype and secondarily by method of resistance development when analyzed using principal component analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Kinases involved in proliferation and differentiation signaling pathways (ex: Pdgfrb, Pdk2, Tnik, Mapk3, Fgfr2) were upregulated in both RNAseq and MIB-MS datasets and thus represent putative druggable targets for dual kinase inhibition. Analysis of commonly upregulated kinases and their commercially available inhibitors revealed dovitinib and dasatinib, two brain-penetrant drugs approved for other cancer indications, as candidates for dual inhibition with an EGFR TKI. Resistant cell lines were all more sensitive to dovitinib than their drug-naïve parents; however, sensitivity to dasatinib varied. BLISS analysis of dual treatment with EGFR TKI neratinib and dasatinib or dovitinib revealed synergistic drug interactions in most lines. Additionally, drug-naïve cells displayed a robust, acute proteomic response to EGFR TKI afatinib over 48h, while the response of resistant lines was significantly blunted. This model system can also be used to examine acute vs. long-term kinome response to EGFR TKI. Acute response was examined by treating drug-naïve cells with afatinib over 48h, and long-term kinome rewiring was observed by comparing untreated cells to gefitinib- and erlotinib-resistant cell lines. Combing both RNAseq datasets for kinases upregulated in both drug-naïve cells over a 48h EGFR TKI treatment course and in resistant cell lines compared to their sensitive parents reveals 21 and 13 common kinases, respectively, at p<0.001. Eight of these kinases (Cdk19, Ddr1, Kalrn, Khk, Mapk3, Pink1, Tnik, Ulk2) appear in both the in vitro and in vivo datasets, indicating a conserved kinome response regardless of method of resistance generation. Overall, integrated kinome profiling in GBM models with defined mutational profiles provides a powerful framework to identify novel therapeutic targets that could significantly alter current treatment paradigms.
Citation Format: Abigail K. Shelton, Erin Smithberger, Madison Butler, Allie Stamper, Ryan E. Bash, Steve P. Angus, Michael P. East, Gary L. Johnson, Michael E. Berens, Frank B. Furnari, Ryan Miller. Acquired resistance to targeted inhibitors in EGFR-driven glioblastoma: Identification of dual kinase targets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3248.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Madison Butler
- 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Ryan E. Bash
- 2University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Michael P. East
- 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gary L. Johnson
- 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Ryan Miller
- 2University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smithberger E, Shelton AK, Bash RE, Butler MK, Flores AR, Stamper A, Angus SP, East MP, Johnson GL, Berens ME, Furnari FB, Miller R. Abstract 1857: Glioblastoma growth is suppressed dual inhibition of EGFR and CDK6 kinases. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor that has proven difficult to treat, despite expressing promising targets such as EGFRvIII. EGFRvIII, a mutant version of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is constitutively active and not present in normal brain cells. The tumor specificity of EGFRvIII and the frequent EGFR amplification seen in GBM make EGFR a potentially attractive therapeutic target; however, clinical studies have shown little to no efficacy for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). One reason for this lack of efficacy may be adaptive resistance. We used RNA sequencing and multiplexed inhibitor beads with mass spectrometry (MIB-MS) to study the transcriptomes and kinomes of genetically engineered mouse astrocytes to investigate this resistance and identify potential targets for dual inhibition. Out of 329 kinases detected by MIB-MS, 76 were differentially expressed between cells with Cdkn2a deletion (“C”) and cells that also overexpressed EGFRvIII (“CEv3”). Thirty-four of these kinases were overexpressed in the CEv3 cells relative to the parental C cells (log2 fold change of 5.6, p<1x105). One of these kinases, Cdk6, is also significantly overexpressed in CEv3 cells versus cells that have a further loss of function mutation of Pten (“CEv3P”) (log2 fold change of 5.6, p<1x105). Despite this significant differential expression at the protein level, RNA expression of Cdk6 was similar between cell lines. When these cells were treated with the CDK6 inhibitor abemaciclib, CEv3 cells were found to be significantly more sensitive to inhibition than C and CEv3P cells (IC50 of 0.10 μM vs. 0.18 μM and 0.23 μM, respectively). Similarly, when cells were treated with abemaciclib in combination with the EGFR inhibitor neratinib, there was significantly higher synergy in CEv3 cells than C or CEv3P cells. Genotypically-matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cells were assayed for EGFR-CDK6 inhibitor synergy and showed a similar pattern of greater synergy in cells with EGFRvIII overexpression and functional PTEN than cells with EGFRvIII overexpression and PTEN loss. CEv3 and CEv3P cells were orthotopically implanted into mice and treated with neratinib, abemaciclib, or a combination. In CEv3-injected mice, combination treatment led to significantly longer survival than either single agent or control treatment. However, in CEv3P-injected mice, no survival difference was seen between any of the treatment arms. Taken together, these data provide strong evidence that CDK6 is a promising target for combination treatment with EGFR inhibitors in glioblastoma.
Citation Format: Erin Smithberger, Abigail K. Shelton, Ryan E. Bash, Madison K. Butler, Alex R. Flores, Allie Stamper, Steven P. Angus, Michael P. East, Gary L. Johnson, Michael E. Berens, Frank B. Furnari, Ryan Miller. Glioblastoma growth is suppressed dual inhibition of EGFR and CDK6 kinases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryan E. Bash
- 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | - Allie Stamper
- 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Michael P. East
- 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gary L. Johnson
- 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Ryan Miller
- 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Su YT, Butler M, Zhang M, Zhang W, Song H, Hwang L, Tran AD, Bash RE, Schorzman AN, Pang Y, Yu G, Zamboni WC, Wang X, Frye SV, Miller CR, Maric D, Terabe M, Gilbert MR, Earp Iii HS, Wu J. MerTK inhibition decreases immune suppressive glioblastoma-associated macrophages and neoangiogenesis in glioblastoma microenvironment. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa065. [PMID: 32642716 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma-associated macrophages and microglia (GAMs) are the predominant immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Activation of MerTK, a receptor tyrosine kinase, polarizes GAMs to an immunosuppressive phenotype, promoting tumor growth. Here, the role of MerTK inhibition in the glioblastoma microenvironment is investigated in vitro and in vivo. Methods Effects of MRX-2843 in glioblastoma microenvironment regulation were determined in vitro by cell viability, cytokine array, in vitro tube formation, Western blotting, and wound healing assays. A syngeneic GL261 orthotopic glioblastoma mouse model was used to evaluate the survival benefit of MRX-2843 treatment. Multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of CD206, an anti-inflammatory marker on GAMs, and angiogenesis in murine brain tumor tissues. Results MRX-2843 inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis in human glioblastoma cells and decreased protein expression of phosphorylated MerTK, AKT, and ERK, which are essential for cell survival signaling. Interleukin-8 and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, the pro-glioma and pro-angiogenic cytokines, were decreased by MRX-2843. Decreased vascular formation and numbers of immunosuppressive (CD206+) GAMs were observed following MRX-2843 treatment in vivo, suggesting that in addition to alleviating immunosuppression, MRX-2843 also inhibits neoangiogenesis in the glioma microenvironment. These results were supported by a prolonged survival in the syngeneic mouse orthotopic GL261 glioblastoma model following MRX-2843 treatment. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MRX-2843 has a therapeutic benefit via promoting GAM polarization away from immunosuppressive condition, inhibiting neoangiogenesis in the glioblastoma microenvironment and inducing tumor cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Ting Su
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Madison Butler
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Meili Zhang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Wei Zhang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Hua Song
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lee Hwang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Andy D Tran
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Allison N Schorzman
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ying Pang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Guangyang Yu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - William C Zamboni
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephen V Frye
- Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher Ryan Miller
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Dragan Maric
- Flow and Imaging Cytometry Core Facility, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Masaki Terabe
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Henry Shelton Earp Iii
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smithberger E, Shelton AK, Butler MK, Flores AR, Bash RE, Angus SP, Sciaky N, Dhruv HD, Johnson GL, Berens ME, Furnari FB, Miller CR. Abstract 3019: Dynamic kinome profiling of EGFRvIII-driven murine astrocyte models of glioblastoma reveals targets for dual kinase inhibitor therapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-3019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with few effective treatments. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently amplified and mutated in GBM, leading to trials of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but none have proven successful. One potential reason for failure is acquired resistance, particularly acute, adaptive responses in the kinome. To study this adaptive resistance mechanism, we used RNA-seq and multiplex inhibitor bead/mass spectrometry (MIB-MS) to analyze transcriptomes and kinomes of genetically-engineered murine astrocytes with genotypes commonly seen in human GBM. We previously showed that 38% (86 of 228) of the expressed kinome varied among a panel of genetically diverse murine astrocytes harboring Cdkn2a deletion (C) plus Pten deletion (CP), wild-type human EGFR (CE) or EGFRvIII (CEv3) overexpression, or both overexpressed EGFRvIII and Pten deletion (CEv3P). Pairwise genotype comparisons revealed multiple differentially activated kinases, including Pdgfrb, Fgfr2, Lyn, Ddr1, and several Ephrin family members. We further investigated these potential targets for dual therapy with EGFR TKI by examining the transcriptional response of cultured astrocytes at 4, 24, and 48 hours after 3 μM afatinib. Afatinib induced no kinome changes in C and only 3 kinases (Fn3k, Prkg2, and Syk) were altered in CP astrocytes. Despite similar baseline gene expression profiles, CE astrocytes overexpressing wild-type EGFR responded significantly differently than C astrocytes without. Five kinases (Dclk1, Epha3, Epha7, Fgfr3, and Prkg1) were induced, while 14 were repressed. Six were similarly repressed in CEv3 (Bub1, Nek2, Pask, Plk4, Prkcb, and Vrk1). Whereas the kinase transcriptome response was blunted in C, CP, and CE astrocytes, afatinib induced altered expression of significantly more kinases in CEv3 (82) and CEv3P cells (49). One particularly attractive target in CEv3 astrocytes was Epha4, which afatinib induced >40-fold. Dual inhibition of EGFRvIII and Epha4 kinases may thus provide an opportunity for more effective targeted therapy.
Citation Format: Erin Smithberger, Abigail K. Shelton, Madison K. Butler, Alex R. Flores, Ryan E. Bash, Steven P. Angus, Noah Sciaky, Harshil D. Dhruv, Gary L. Johnson, Michael E. Berens, Frank B. Furnari, C. Ryan Miller. Dynamic kinome profiling of EGFRvIII-driven murine astrocyte models of glioblastoma reveals targets for dual kinase inhibitor therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Noah Sciaky
- 1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu J, Frady LN, Bash RE, Cohen SM, Schorzman AN, Su YT, Irvin DM, Zamboni WC, Wang X, Frye SV, Ewend MG, Sulman EP, Gilbert MR, Earp HS, Miller CR. MerTK as a therapeutic target in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:92-102. [PMID: 28605477 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Glioma-associated macrophages and microglia (GAMs) are components of the glioblastoma (GBM) microenvironment that express MerTK, a receptor tyrosine kinase that triggers efferocytosis and can suppress innate immune responses. The aim of the study was to define MerTK as a therapeutic target using an orally bioavailable inhibitor, UNC2025. Methods We examined MerTK expression in tumor cells and macrophages in matched patient GBM samples by double-label immunohistochemistry. UNC2025-induced MerTK inhibition was studied in vitro and in vivo. Results MerTK/CD68+ macrophages increased in recurrent tumors while MerTK/glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive tumor cells did not. Pharmacokinetic studies showed high tumor exposures of UNC2025 in a syngeneic orthotopic allograft mouse GBM model. The same model mice were randomized to receive vehicle, daily UNC2025, fractionated external beam radiotherapy (XRT), or UNC2025/XRT. Although median survival (21, 22, 35, and 35 days, respectively) was equivalent with or without UNC2025, bioluminescence imaging (BLI) showed significant growth delay with XRT/UNC2025 treatment and complete responses in 19%. The responders remained alive for 60 days and showed regression to 1%-10% of pretreatment BLI tumor burden; 5 of 6 were tumor free by histology. In contrast, only 2% of 98 GBM mice of the same model treated with XRT survived 50 days and none survived 60 days. UNC2025 also reduced CD206+ macrophages in mouse tumor samples. Conclusions These results suggest that MerTK inhibition combined with XRT has a therapeutic effect in a subset of GBM. Further mechanistic studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lauren N Frady
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.,Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Stephanie M Cohen
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Allison N Schorzman
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yu-Ting Su
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - William C Zamboni
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.,Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephen V Frye
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew G Ewend
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - C Ryan Miller
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.,Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vitucci M, Irvin DM, McNeill RS, Schmid RS, Simon JM, Dhruv HD, Siegel MB, Werneke AM, Bash RE, Kim S, Berens ME, Miller CR. Genomic profiles of low-grade murine gliomas evolve during progression to glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2018; 19:1237-1247. [PMID: 28398584 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gliomas are diverse neoplasms with multiple molecular subtypes. How tumor-initiating mutations relate to molecular subtypes as these tumors evolve during malignant progression remains unclear. Methods We used genetically engineered mouse models, histopathology, genetic lineage tracing, expression profiling, and copy number analyses to examine how genomic tumor diversity evolves during the course of malignant progression from low- to high-grade disease. Results Knockout of all 3 retinoblastoma (Rb) family proteins was required to initiate low-grade tumors in adult mouse astrocytes. Mutations activating mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, specifically KrasG12D, potentiated Rb-mediated tumorigenesis. Low-grade tumors showed mutant Kras-specific transcriptome profiles but lacked copy number mutations. These tumors stochastically progressed to high-grade, in part through acquisition of copy number mutations. High-grade tumor transcriptomes were heterogeneous and consisted of 3 subtypes that mimicked human mesenchymal, proneural, and neural glioblastomas. Subtypes were confirmed in validation sets of high-grade mouse tumors initiated by different driver mutations as well as human patient-derived xenograft models and glioblastoma tumors. Conclusion These results suggest that oncogenic driver mutations influence the genomic profiles of low-grade tumors and that these, as well as progression-acquired mutations, contribute strongly to the genomic heterogeneity across high-grade tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Vitucci
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - David M Irvin
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Robert S McNeill
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Ralf S Schmid
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jeremy M Simon
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Harshil D Dhruv
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Marni B Siegel
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Andrea M Werneke
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Seungchan Kim
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Michael E Berens
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Neurosciences Center, and Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;Cancer & Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McNeill RS, Stroobant EE, Smithberger E, Canoutas DA, Butler MK, Shelton AK, Patel SD, Limas JC, Skinner KR, Bash RE, Schmid RS, Miller CR. PIK3CA missense mutations promote glioblastoma pathogenesis, but do not enhance targeted PI3K inhibition. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200014. [PMID: 29975751 PMCID: PMC6033446 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary brain tumor. Multimodal treatment is empiric and prognosis remains poor. Recurrent PIK3CA missense mutations (PIK3CAmut) in GBM are restricted to three functional domains: adaptor binding (ABD), helical, and kinase. Defining how these mutations influence gliomagenesis and response to kinase inhibitors may aid in the clinical development of novel targeted therapies in biomarker-stratified patients. Methods We used normal human astrocytes immortalized via expression of hTERT, E6, and E7 (NHA). We selected two PIK3CAmut from each of 3 mutated domains and induced their expression in NHA with (NHARAS) and without mutant RAS using lentiviral vectors. We then examined the role of PIK3CAmut in gliomagenesis in vitro and in mice, as well as response to targeted PI3K (PI3Ki) and MEK (MEKi) inhibitors in vitro. Results PIK3CAmut, particularly helical and kinase domain mutations, potentiated proximal PI3K signaling and migration of NHA and NHARASin vitro. Only kinase domain mutations promoted NHA colony formation, but both helical and kinase domain mutations promoted NHARAS tumorigenesis in vivo. PIK3CAmut status had minimal effects on PI3Ki and MEKi efficacy. However, PI3Ki/MEKi synergism was pronounced in NHA and NHARAS harboring ABD or helical mutations. Conclusion PIK3CAmut promoted differential gliomagenesis based on the mutated domain. While PIK3CAmut did not influence sensitivity to single agent PI3Ki, they did alter PI3Ki/MEKi synergism. Taken together, our results demonstrate that a subset of PIK3CAmut promote tumorigenesis and suggest that patients with helical domain mutations may be most sensitive to dual PI3Ki/MEKi treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S McNeill
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Emily E Stroobant
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Erin Smithberger
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Demitra A Canoutas
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Madison K Butler
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Abigail K Shelton
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Shrey D Patel
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Juanita C Limas
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Kasey R Skinner
- Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Ralf S Schmid
- Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.,Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.,Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.,Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.,Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Van Swearingen AED, Sambade MJ, Siegel MB, Sud S, McNeill RS, Bevill SM, Chen X, Bash RE, Mounsey L, Golitz BT, Santos C, Deal A, Parker JS, Rashid N, Miller CR, Johnson GL, Anders CK. Combined kinase inhibitors of MEK1/2 and either PI3K or PDGFR are efficacious in intracranial triple-negative breast cancer. Neuro Oncol 2018; 19:1481-1493. [PMID: 28486691 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), lacking expression of hormone and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors, is an aggressive subtype that frequently metastasizes to the brain and has no FDA-approved systemic therapies. Previous literature demonstrates mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) pathway activation in TNBC brain metastases. Thus, we aimed to discover rational combinatorial therapies with MEK inhibition, hypothesizing that co-inhibition using clinically available brain-penetrant inhibitors would improve survival in preclinical models of TNBC brain metastases. Methods Using human-derived TNBC cell lines, synthetic lethal small interfering RNA kinase screens were evaluated with brain-penetrant inhibitors against MEK1/2 (selumetinib, AZD6244) or phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K; buparlisib, BKM120). Mice bearing intracranial TNBC tumors (SUM149, MDA-MB-231Br, MDA-MB-468, or MDA-MB-436) were treated with MEK, PI3K, or platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR; pazopanib) inhibitors alone or in combination. Tumors were analyzed by western blot and multiplexed kinase inhibitor beads/mass spectrometry to assess treatment effects. Results Screens identified MEK+PI3K and MEK+PDGFR inhibitors as tractable, rational combinations. Dual treatment of selumetinib with buparlisib or pazopanib was synergistic in TNBC cells in vitro. Both combinations improved survival in intracranial SUM149 and MDA-MB-231Br, but not MDA-MB-468 or MDA-MB-436. Treatments decreased mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K (Akt) signaling in sensitive (SUM149 and 231Br) but not resistant models (MDA-MB-468). Exploratory analysis of kinome reprogramming in SUM149 intracranial tumors after MEK ± PI3K inhibition demonstrates extensive kinome changes with treatment, especially in MAPK pathway members. Conclusions Results demonstrate that rational combinations of the clinically available inhibitors selumetinib with buparlisib or pazopanib may prove to be promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of some TNBC brain metastases. Additionally, effective combination treatments cause widespread alterations in kinase pathways, including targetable potential resistance drivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E D Van Swearingen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Maria J Sambade
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Marni B Siegel
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Shivani Sud
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Robert S McNeill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Samantha M Bevill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Xin Chen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Louisa Mounsey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Brian T Golitz
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Charlene Santos
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joel S Parker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Naim Rashid
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gary L Johnson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Carey K Anders
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McNeill RS, Canoutas DA, Stuhlmiller TJ, Dhruv HD, Irvin DM, Bash RE, Angus SP, Herring LE, Simon JM, Skinner KR, Limas JC, Chen X, Schmid RS, Siegel MB, Van Swearingen AED, Hadler MJ, Sulman EP, Sarkaria JN, Anders CK, Graves LM, Berens ME, Johnson GL, Miller CR. Combination therapy with potent PI3K and MAPK inhibitors overcomes adaptive kinome resistance to single agents in preclinical models of glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2018; 19:1469-1480. [PMID: 28379424 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Prognosis remains poor despite multimodal therapy. Developing alternative treatments is essential. Drugs targeting kinases within the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) effectors of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling represent promising candidates. Methods We previously developed a non-germline genetically engineered mouse model of GBM in which PI3K and MAPK are activated via Pten deletion and KrasG12D in immortalized astrocytes. Using this model, we examined the influence of drug potency on target inhibition, alternate pathway activation, efficacy, and synergism of single agent and combination therapy with inhibitors of these 2 pathways. Efficacy was then examined in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) in vitro and in vivo. Results PI3K and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor potency was directly associated with target inhibition, alternate RTK effector activation, and efficacy in mutant murine astrocytes in vitro. The kinomes of GBM PDX and tumor samples were heterogeneous, with a subset of the latter harboring MAPK hyperactivation. Dual PI3K/MEK inhibitor treatment overcame alternate effector activation, was synergistic in vitro, and was more effective than single agent therapy in subcutaneous murine allografts. However, efficacy in orthotopic allografts was minimal. This was likely due to dose-limiting toxicity and incomplete target inhibition. Conclusion Drug potency influences PI3K/MEK inhibitor-induced target inhibition, adaptive kinome reprogramming, efficacy, and synergy. Our findings suggest that combination therapies with highly potent, brain-penetrant kinase inhibitors will be required to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S McNeill
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Demitra A Canoutas
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy J Stuhlmiller
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Harshil D Dhruv
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David M Irvin
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven P Angus
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura E Herring
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy M Simon
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kasey R Skinner
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Juanita C Limas
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xin Chen
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ralf S Schmid
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marni B Siegel
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda E D Van Swearingen
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael J Hadler
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carey K Anders
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lee M Graves
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Berens
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gary L Johnson
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Biology, Pharmacology, Genetics, Medicine, and Neurology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Hematology/Oncology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Proteomics Core Facility, Neurosciences Center, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, and Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cancer & Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Swearingen AEV, Sambade MJ, Siegel MB, Sud S, Bevill SM, Golitz BT, Bash RE, Santos CM, Darr DB, Parker JS, Miller CR, Johnson GL, Anders CK. Abstract A03: Several rational combination kinase inhibitor treatments identified by synthetic lethality screens are efficacious in intracranial triple negative breast cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-8514.synthleth-a03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Nearly half of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients develop brain metastases (BMs) and face a poor prognosis. There are no FDA-approved systemic therapies to treat TNBC BM, due in part to the blood-brain barrier. TNBC and breast cancer BMs exhibit both activation of the PI3K and MEK pathways, but attempts to target them in preclinical models have shown limited efficacy due to innate and acquired resistance to kinase inhibition in TNBC. In this study, we identify several clinically relevant rational combination therapies based on synthetic lethality and evaluate the efficacy of combined brain-penetrant, clinically-available kinase inhibitors in intracranial TNBC models.
Methods: An siRNA screen against 720 kinase genes was used to identify synthetic enhancers of lethality with pan-PI3K inhibitor (BKM120) or MEK1/2 inhibitor (AZD6244) treatment in vitro using TNBC models capable of growing in mouse brain (SUM149, MDA-MB-231Br). The efficacy of these and other brain-penetrant drugs of interest based on the screen were assessed for efficacy in vitro, alone (IC50s) and combined (synergy). Some combinations were evaluated in vivo in mice bearing intracranial TNBC tumors for their effects on survival and tumor burden. Tumor burden was monitored via bioluminescence. IC tumors from treated mice were extracted, fresh frozen, and analyzed for the activation state of the kinome using multiplexed kinase inhibitor bead (MIB) enriched mass spectrometry (MS).
Results: The screen identified the following combinations as synthetic lethal pairs: PI3K+MEK, MEK+PDGFR, PI3K+AURKA, MEK+BRAF. Pharmacological synergy of combined treatments was confirmed in vitro between PI3K(/mTOR)+MEK, MEK+PDGFR, and PI3K+AURKA, in TNBC cells (SUM149, 231Br) using brain-penetrant drugs in clinical development (mTOR inhibitor Everolimus, dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GNE317, PDGFR inhibitor Pazopanib, AURKA inhibitor MLN8237, BRAF inhibitor Dabrafenib). For some combinations, particularly PI3K+AURKA inhibition, sequencing of the drugs significantly altered the combined effects and synergy.
Combinations which were synthetically lethal and synergistic at physiologically relevant doses in vitro demonstrated enhanced efficacy in vivo, including PI3K+MEK, MEK+PDGFR, and PI3K+AURKA. In contrast, other combinations (i.e. PI3K+mTOR) did not significantly improve survival or tumor burden in vivo. Despite improved survival with some combination treatments, mice eventually succumbed to tumor burden as tumors eventually grew. Kinome analysis of IC tumors treated with PI3K (BKM120) and/or MEK1/2 (AZD6244) inhibitors for 2 weeks identified several potential resistance markers, including INSR, IGF1R, and FGFR2, which may be targetable clinically.
Conclusions: Synthetic lethality screens identified multiple rational combination therapies based on PI3K and/or MEK inhibition in TNBC cells, particularly PI3K+MEK, MEK+PDGFR, and PI3K+AURKA. Combined use of brain-penetrant, clinically available inhibitors against these targets showed promising efficacy in intracranial TNBC mouse models. Rational combinations of brain-penetrant kinase inhibitors are promising strategies for a patient population with few options. In vivo studies assessing the efficacy of other identified combinations, as well as more extensive characterization of potential resistance mechanisms, in intracranial TNBC mouse models are warranted to provide the translational foundation for future clinical studies.
Citation Format: Amanda E.D. Van Swearingen, Maria J. Sambade, Marni B. Siegel, Shivani Sud, Samantha M. Bevill, Brian T. Golitz, Ryan E. Bash, Charlene M. Santos, David B. Darr, Joel S. Parker, C. Ryan Miller, Gary L. Johnson, Carey K. Anders. Several rational combination kinase inhibitor treatments identified by synthetic lethality screens are efficacious in intracranial triple negative breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Opportunities and Challenges of Exploiting Synthetic Lethality in Cancer; Jan 4-7, 2017; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2017;16(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marni B. Siegel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shivani Sud
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Brian T. Golitz
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ryan E. Bash
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - David B. Darr
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Joel S. Parker
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C. Ryan Miller
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gary L. Johnson
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Carey K. Anders
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Okolie O, Bago JR, Schmid RS, Irvin DM, Bash RE, Miller CR, Hingtgen SD. Reactive astrocytes potentiate tumor aggressiveness in a murine glioma resection and recurrence model. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18:1622-1633. [PMID: 27298311 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is a universal component of glioma therapy. Little is known about the postoperative microenvironment due to limited preclinical models. Thus, we sought to develop a glioma resection and recurrence model in syngeneic immune-competent mice to understand how surgical resection influences tumor biology and the local microenvironment. METHODS We genetically engineered cells from a murine glioma mouse model to express fluorescent and bioluminescent reporters. Established allografts were resected using image-guided microsurgery. Postoperative tumor recurrence was monitored by serial imaging, and the peritumoral microenvironment was characterized by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Coculture techniques were used to explore how astrocyte injury influences tumor aggressiveness in vitro. Transcriptome and secretome alterations in injured astrocytes was examined by RNA-seq and Luminex. RESULTS We found that image-guided resection achieved >90% reduction in tumor volume but failed to prevent both local and distant tumor recurrence. Immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein and nestin showed that resection-induced injury led to temporal and spatial alterations in reactive astrocytes within the peritumoral microenvironment. In vitro, we found that astrocyte injury induced transcriptome and secretome alterations and promoted tumor proliferation, as well as migration. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a unique syngeneic model of glioma resection and recurrence in immune-competent mice. Furthermore, this model provided insights into the pattern of postsurgical tumor recurrence and changes in the peritumoral microenvironment, as well as the impact of injured astrocytes on glioma growth and invasion. A better understanding of the postsurgical tumor microenvironment will allow development of targeted anticancer agents that improve surgery-mediated effects on tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onyinyechukwu Okolie
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| | - Juli R Bago
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| | - Ralf S Schmid
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| | - David M Irvin
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| | - Shawn D Hingtgen
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (O.O., J.R.B., S.D.H.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Neurology, and Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.); Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., D.M.I., R.E.B., C.R.M., S.D.H.); Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (S.D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Irvin DM, McNeill RS, Bash RE, Miller CR. Intrinsic Astrocyte Heterogeneity Influences Tumor Growth in Glioma Mouse Models. Brain Pathol 2016; 27:36-50. [PMID: 26762242 DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of cellular origin on glioma pathogenesis remains elusive. We previously showed that mutations inactivating Rb and Pten and activating Kras transform astrocytes and induce tumorigenesis throughout the adult mouse brain. However, it remained unclear whether astrocyte subpopulations were susceptible to these mutations. We therefore used genetic lineage tracing and fate mapping in adult conditional, inducible genetically engineered mice to monitor transformation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST) astrocytes and immunofluorescence to monitor cellular composition of the tumor microenvironment over time. Because considerable regional heterogeneity exists among astrocytes, we also examined the influence of brain region on tumor growth. GFAP astrocyte transformation induced uniformly rapid, regionally independent tumor growth, but transformation of GLAST astrocytes induced slowly growing tumors with significant regional bias. Transformed GLAST astrocytes had reduced proliferative response in culture and in vivo and malignant progression was delayed in these tumors. Recruited glial cells, including proliferating astrocytes, oligodendrocyte progenitors and microglia, were the majority of GLAST, but not GFAP astrocyte-derived tumors and their abundance dynamically changed over time. These results suggest that intrinsic astrocyte heterogeneity, and perhaps regional brain microenvironment, significantly contributes to glioma pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Irvin
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Robert S McNeill
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.,Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.,Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.,Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.,Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schmid RS, Simon JM, Vitucci M, McNeill RS, Bash RE, Werneke AM, Huey L, White KK, Ewend MG, Wu J, Miller CR. Core pathway mutations induce de-differentiation of murine astrocytes into glioblastoma stem cells that are sensitive to radiation but resistant to temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18:962-73. [PMID: 26826202 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioma stem cells (GSCs) from human glioblastomas (GBMs) are resistant to radiation and chemotherapy and may drive recurrence. Treatment efficacy may depend on GSCs, expression of DNA repair enzymes such as methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT), or transcriptome subtype. METHODS To model genetic alterations in human GBM core signaling pathways, we induced Rb knockout, Kras activation, and Pten deletion mutations in cortical murine astrocytes. Neurosphere culture, differentiation, and orthotopic transplantation assays were used to assess whether these mutations induced de-differentiation into GSCs. Genome-wide chromatin landscape alterations and expression profiles were examined by formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements (FAIRE) seq and RNA-seq. Radiation and temozolomide efficacy were examined in vitro and in an allograft model in vivo. Effects of radiation on transcriptome subtype were examined by microarray expression profiling. RESULTS Cultured triple mutant astrocytes gained unlimited self-renewal and multilineage differentiation capacity. These cells harbored significantly altered chromatin landscapes that were associated with downregulation of astrocyte- and upregulation of stem cell-associated genes, particularly the Hoxa locus of embryonic transcription factors. Triple-mutant astrocytes formed serially transplantable glioblastoma allografts that were sensitive to radiation but expressed MGMT and were resistant to temozolomide. Radiation induced a shift in transcriptome subtype of GBM allografts from proneural to mesenchymal. CONCLUSION A defined set of core signaling pathway mutations induces de-differentiation of cortical murine astrocytes into GSCs with altered chromatin landscapes and transcriptomes. This non-germline genetically engineered mouse model mimics human proneural GBM on histopathological, molecular, and treatment response levels. It may be useful for dissecting the mechanisms of treatment resistance and developing more effective therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf S Schmid
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Jeremy M Simon
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Mark Vitucci
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Robert S McNeill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Andrea M Werneke
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Lauren Huey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Kristen K White
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Matthew G Ewend
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - Jing Wu
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.S.S., L.H., M.G.E., J.W., C.R.M.); Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.V., R.S.M., R.E.B., A.M.W., K.K.W., C.R.M.); Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (J.M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.G.E., J.W.); Department of Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (C.R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McNeill RS, Canoutas DA, Schmid RS, Bash RE, Constance BH, Azam SH, Reuther RA, Johnson GL, Miller CR. ATPS-55INFLUENCE OF MAPK AND PI3K PATHWAY MUTATIONS ON RESPONSE TO TARGETED INHIBITORS. Neuro Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov204.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
16
|
Van Swearingen AE, Siegel MB, Sambade MJ, Sud S, Miller SM, Silva G, Bash RE, Santos CM, Darr DB, Golitz B, Parker JS, Miller CR, Johnson GL, Anders CK. Abstract 2579: Combination therapy with MEK inhibition is efficacious in intracranial triple negative breast cancer models. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-2579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Nearly half of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients develop brain metastases (BM) and face a poor prognosis. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents many treatments from reaching intracranial tumors, and there are no FDA-approved systemic therapies to treat TNBC BM. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of BBB-permeable, clinically-available inhibitors of MEK and identified rational co-target pathways in preclinical models of intracranial (IC) TNBC.
Methods: In vitro IC50s, synergy, and siRNA screens (700 kinase genes) were conducted in 4 human-derived TNBC lines (SUM149, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-231Br). We evaluated the efficacy of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (AZD), the pan-PI3K inhibitor BKM120 (BKM), and the PDGFR inhibitor Pazopanib (Pazo) in IC TNBC mouse models. Tumor burden was monitored via bioluminescence, and IC tumors were frozen for gene expression analyses using custom human 4×44K Agilent microarrays or of kinome activity profiles using multiplex kinase inhibitor beads and mass spectrometry. To determine drivers of AZD sensitivity, DNA copy number data (Broad CCLE) was analyzed using SWITCHplus to identify copy number alterations that differ between sensitive (n = 8) vs. resistant (n = 12) TNBC lines based on their IC50s (Sanger Cancerxgene).
Results: In vitro, SUM149 and 231Br TNBC cells exhibited lower (<20 uM) AZD IC50s while 468 cells were resistant (IC50 >40 uM). Several genes synthetically enhanced lethality in SUM149 and 231Br cells: PI3K genes and PDGFRα/β with AZD, and MAPK/MAP2K/MAP3K genes with BKM, suggesting MEK+PI3K and MEK+PDGFR inhibition as rational combinations. AZD plus BKM or Pazo were synergistic in vitro in sensitive cell lines.
In vivo, AZD reduced tumor burden and improved survival in the SUM149 (72 vs. 45 days in controls, p < 0.005) and 231Br (37 vs. 30 days, p < 0.02) models, with no benefit in the other two models. Single agent BKM or Pazo resulted in little to no improvement in any model. However, in AZD-sensitive models, combined AZD+BKM inhibition increased survival (SUM149: 87 vs 45 days, p < 0.0001; MDA-MB-231Br: 52 vs 30 days, p < 0.001) as did AZD+Pazo (SUM149: 88 vs. 35 days, p < 0.0001).
Several DNA segments were significantly altered in sensitive vs. resistant TNBC cell lines. Notably, MEK-pathway genes were lost in the resistant lines. Ongoing work will complete characterization of therapies in all models in vitro and in vivo and will compare genetic, transcriptional, and kinome activity alterations.
Conclusions: TNBC models exhibit different innate sensitivities to the BBB-permeable MEK inhibitor AZD6244. In sensitive models, AZD improves survival and reduces intracranial tumor burden, and rational combined inhibition of PI3K or PDGFR further increases survival. Identification of predictive biomarkers will enable translation of our results to biomarker-driven clinical trials for patients with TNBC BM.
Citation Format: Amanda E.D. Van Swearingen, Marni B. Siegel, Maria J. Sambade, Shivani Sud, Samantha M. Miller, Grace Silva, Ryan E. Bash, Charlene M. Santos, David B. Darr, Brian Golitz, Joel S. Parker, C. Ryan Miller, Gary L. Johnson, Carey K. Anders. Combination therapy with MEK inhibition is efficacious in intracranial triple negative breast cancer models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2579. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2579
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marni B. Siegel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Shivani Sud
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Grace Silva
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ryan E. Bash
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - David B. Darr
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brian Golitz
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Joel S. Parker
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C. Ryan Miller
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gary L. Johnson
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Carey K. Anders
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McNeill RS, Schmid RS, Bash RE, Vitucci M, White KK, Werneke AM, Constance BH, Huff B, Miller CR. Modeling astrocytoma pathogenesis in vitro and in vivo using cortical astrocytes or neural stem cells from conditional, genetically engineered mice. J Vis Exp 2014:e51763. [PMID: 25146643 DOI: 10.3791/51763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Current astrocytoma models are limited in their ability to define the roles of oncogenic mutations in specific brain cell types during disease pathogenesis and their utility for preclinical drug development. In order to design a better model system for these applications, phenotypically wild-type cortical astrocytes and neural stem cells (NSC) from conditional, genetically engineered mice (GEM) that harbor various combinations of floxed oncogenic alleles were harvested and grown in culture. Genetic recombination was induced in vitro using adenoviral Cre-mediated recombination, resulting in expression of mutated oncogenes and deletion of tumor suppressor genes. The phenotypic consequences of these mutations were defined by measuring proliferation, transformation, and drug response in vitro. Orthotopic allograft models, whereby transformed cells are stereotactically injected into the brains of immune-competent, syngeneic littermates, were developed to define the role of oncogenic mutations and cell type on tumorigenesis in vivo. Unlike most established human glioblastoma cell line xenografts, injection of transformed GEM-derived cortical astrocytes into the brains of immune-competent littermates produced astrocytomas, including the most aggressive subtype, glioblastoma, that recapitulated the histopathological hallmarks of human astrocytomas, including diffuse invasion of normal brain parenchyma. Bioluminescence imaging of orthotopic allografts from transformed astrocytes engineered to express luciferase was utilized to monitor in vivo tumor growth over time. Thus, astrocytoma models using astrocytes and NSC harvested from GEM with conditional oncogenic alleles provide an integrated system to study the genetics and cell biology of astrocytoma pathogenesis in vitro and in vivo and may be useful in preclinical drug development for these devastating diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S McNeill
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Ralf S Schmid
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Ryan E Bash
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Mark Vitucci
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Kristen K White
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Andrea M Werneke
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Brian H Constance
- Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine
| | - Byron Huff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine; Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine; Department of Neurology, Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vitucci M, Karpinich NO, Bash RE, Werneke AM, Schmid RS, White KK, McNeill RS, Huff B, Wang S, Van Dyke T, Miller CR. Cooperativity between MAPK and PI3K signaling activation is required for glioblastoma pathogenesis. Neuro Oncol 2013; 15:1317-29. [PMID: 23814263 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) genomes feature recurrent genetic alterations that dysregulate core intracellular signaling pathways, including the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint and the MAPK and PI3K effector arms of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling. Elucidation of the phenotypic consequences of activated RTK effectors is required for the design of effective therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. METHODS Genetically defined, G1/S checkpoint-defective cortical murine astrocytes with constitutively active Kras and/or Pten deletion mutations were used to systematically investigate the individual and combined roles of these 2 RTK signaling effectors in phenotypic hallmarks of glioblastoma pathogenesis, including growth, migration, and invasion in vitro. A novel syngeneic orthotopic allograft model system was used to examine in vivo tumorigenesis. RESULTS Constitutively active Kras and/or Pten deletion mutations activated both MAPK and PI3K signaling. Their combination led to maximal growth, migration, and invasion of G1/S-defective astrocytes in vitro and produced progenitor-like transcriptomal profiles that mimic human proneural GBM. Activation of both RTK effector arms was required for in vivo tumorigenesis and produced highly invasive, proneural-like GBM. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that cortical astrocytes can be transformed into GBM and that combined dysregulation of MAPK and PI3K signaling revert G1/S-defective astrocytes to a primitive gene expression state. This genetically-defined, immunocompetent model of proneural GBM will be useful for preclinical development of MAPK/PI3K-targeted, subtype-specific therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Vitucci
- Corresponding Author: C. Ryan Miller, MD, PhD, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 6109B Neurosciences Research Building, Campus Box 7250, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7250.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schmid RS, Bash RE, Werneke AM, Miller CR. Abstract 3302: Roles of cortical and subventricular GFAP+ astrocytes in initiation of astrocytomas. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-3302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Astrocytomas, including glioblastomas (GBM), are characterized by cellular, molecular, and morphological heterogeneity, which raises the question from which cells astrocytomas originate. Research with many different types of cancer has established that tumor initiating cells share molecular characteristics and gene expression signatures with stem cells; however, the origin of glioma initiating cells and their relationship to adult neural stem cells remains unclear. Using conditional, inducible genetically-engineered mouse models (GEMM) with inactivated RB (GFAP-driven transgenic expression of N-terminal SV40 large T mutant (T121), T) and/or PTEN (P) and/or constitutively activated KRAS (R, KRAS(G12D)), we show that tumorigenesis was initiated in both parenchymal GFAP+ astrocytes as well as GFAP+ NSC/progenitor cells in the subventricular zone (SVZ) within two weeks of induction in adult mice. The induced GFAP+ cells proliferated (measured by EDU incorporation) and expressed multiple neural stem cell (NSC) markers such as Sox2, nestin and CD133, which persisted in developing astrocytomas over several months. Primary cortical astrocytes from TRP-/- mice cultured in vitro under NSC conditions displayed self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation potential and expressed multiple NSC markers. When stereotactically injected in the diencephalon of syngeneic recipient mice, astrocytomas formed within 3 weeks, which histopathologically and genetically resembled human glioblastoma and proved to be fatal with a median survival of 25 days. To further evaluate the relationship between adult neural stem/progenitor cells in the SVZ and astrocytoma initiating cells, we crossed TRP GEMM with knock-in Sox2-GFP reporter mice to purify TRP neural stem cells from the SVZ. These cells were then stereotactically injected into the diencephalon of syngeneic recipient mice. Allograft cells, identified by GFP expression, were found proliferating around the injection site several weeks after injection, suggestive of developing astrocytomas. Some cells also migrated along white matter tracks and infiltrated the stem cell niche in the subventricular zone. These results suggest that GFAP+ NSC within the SVZ, and potentially GFAP+ astrocytes elsewhere in the neuraxis, may serve as the cell-of-origin for diffuse astrocytomas in the adult murine brain.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3302. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3302
Collapse
|
20
|
Vitucci M, Huff B, Bash RE, Karpinich NO, Schmid RS, Miller CR. Abstract 4305: Dissecting the requirements for astrocytoma and invasion using genetically-engineered mouse models. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-4305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Astrocytomas are characterized by diffuse invasion, precluding their complete surgical resection. PTEN, a negative PI3 kinase (PI3K) pathway regulator, is altered in 40-80% of high-grade astrocytomas (HGA), including glioblastoma (GBM). However, its role in astrocytoma invasion remains unclear. Primary astrocytes from six genetically-engineered mouse (GEM) models, with conditional alleles that inactivate Rb (T) and/or Pten (P) and/or constitutively activate Kras (R, KrasG12D) upon Cre recombination, were used to analyze PI3K pathway signaling, proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro by immunoblot, cell counting, wound healing and time-lapse video microscopy, and collagen invasion, respectively. Gene expression microarrays were used to compare the transcriptomes of GEM astrocytes to human HGA. Tumorigenicity and survival were determined in vivo in orthotopic allograft models. Invasion was assessed by morphometric analysis. Pten ablation increased levels of phospho-Akt and phospho-S6. In cells with both Rb inactivation and Kras activation (TR), complete inactivation of Pten shortened doubling time (DT) by 42% (P<0.01), increased single cell migration velocity and wound healing closure 42% and 84%, respectively (P<0.0001), and increased collagen invasion 68-fold (Pα0.0001). Both the proliferation and migration effects were rescued by transient transfection with wild-type murine Pten. In cells lacking both Rb and Pten (TP), activated Kras shortened DT 73% (P<0.01), increased velocity 44% and wound closure 94% (P<0.0005), and had no significant effect on invasion. Unsupervised gene expression analysis showed that transformed astrocytes (nα3 unique isolates per genotype) primarily cluster into three groups consisting of TR; TRP+/− and TRP-/-; and T, TP+/− and TP-/-. TRP+/− - TRP-/- astrocytes were similar to human mesenchymal HGA based on gene set analysis (P=0.043). In vivo, 105 TRP-/-, TRP+/−, TP-/-, and TR cells produced HGA in 9/19, 6/10, 14/18, and 6/10 animals, respectively. Median survivals were 31, 78, 75, and 207 d, respectively. TRP-/- tumors were 202% more invasive than TR tumors (P=0.0062) and 42% more invasive than TP-/- tumors (P=0.315). We conclude that Pten ablation significantly affects proliferation and migration of astrocytoma cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Tumor incidence and survival in the allograft is correlated with in vitro invasiveness. In future studies, the orthotopic allograft model system and morphometric analyses described herein can facilitate analysis of the genetics of mesenchymal HGA invasion in vivo. Use of alternative initiating genetic events in this model system well help define the requirements for development of other HGA human subtypes and provide a facile platform for use in preclinical studies.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4305. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4305
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Vitucci
- 1University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Byron Huff
- 1University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ryan E. Bash
- 1University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Ralf S. Schmid
- 1University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C Ryan Miller
- 1University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|