Analysis of Phase 3 telavancin nosocomial pneumonia data excluding patients with severe renal impairment and acute renal failure

Objectives

Telavancin is approved in Europe for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus when other alternatives are not suitable. The approved European prescribing information contraindicates the use of telavancin in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, including patients on haemodialysis) and pre-existing acute renal failure owing to the higher observed mortality in these patients. Data from the ATTAIN studies were reanalysed, excluding patients with these contraindicating conditions at baseline. (At the time of submission of this article, the European marketing authorization of telavancin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia was suspended pending evidence of a new European Medicines Agency-approved supplier. Clinigen Healthcare Ltd, Theravance's commercialization partner for telavancin in Europe, is in the process of seeking approval of a new manufacturing source.)

Methods

A post hoc analysis of data from two Phase 3 ATTAIN trials of telavancin for the treatment of Gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia assessing clinical outcomes and safety.

Results

The all-treated population for this analysis represented 84.2% (1266/1503) of the ATTAIN all-treated population. The cure rates in the clinically evaluable population were similar in the telavancin (82.5%, 231/280) and vancomycin (81.3%, 243/299) groups [treatment difference (95% CI): 1.3% (−5.0% to 7.6%)], and were consistent with the overall ATTAIN study results. The cure rate was higher in the telavancin than the vancomycin treatment group in microbiologically evaluable patients with only Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline [85.0% (130/153) versus 75.2% (109/145), respectively; treatment difference (95% CI): 9.7% (0.6%–18.8%)]. The incidences of adverse events were similar between treatment groups and consistent with the overall findings of the ATTAIN study.

Conclusions

This analysis demonstrated that in the subset of patients without severe renal impairment or pre-existing acute renal failure, clinical and safety outcomes were similar in the telavancin and vancomycin treatment groups.

Effects of telavancin on coagulation test results

BACKGROUND

The lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, telavancin, may interfere with some laboratory coagulation tests including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of telavancin on PT and aPTT assays in common use.

METHODS

Pooled normal human plasma was spiked with telavancin 10, 20, 100 or 200 μg/ml (equivalent to trough, 2 × trough, peak and 2 × peak clinical plasma concentrations, respectively) or diluent control (0.9% sodium chloride). Samples were analysed using 16 PT reagents and seven aPTT reagents.

RESULTS

Telavancin 200 μg/ml (corresponding to 2 × peak clinical plasma concentration), produced significant PT prolongation (> 9% difference vs. diluent control) with all the 16 PT reagents (range 12% to > 600%). At lower telavancin concentrations, PT prolongation was dose-dependent and varied among reagents, but appeared greatest with preparations containing recombinant tissue factor. With telavancin 10 μg/ml (equivalent to trough), PT prolongation was 10% with HemosIL(®) PT-Fibrinogen Recombinant, while ranging from 5% to -1% with all other reagents. Significant (> 34% difference vs. baseline) and dose-dependent aPTT prolongation was observed with all the seven reagents in samples spiked with telavancin 100 or 200 μg/ml (range 65-142% at 200 μg/ml). aPTT reagents containing a silica activator appeared to be more sensitive to telavancin interference. Telavancin 10 μg/ml was not associated with increased aPTT with any of the reagents tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Telavancin has the potential to prolong both PT and aPTT in vitro. It is recommended that samples for PT or aPTT be obtained just prior to a telavancin dose (trough).

Treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated gram-positive skin and skin structure infections: two randomized, multicentre studies of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin. Synercid Skin and Skin Structure Infection Group

Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), the first injectable streptogramin antibiotic available for the treatment of complicated gram-positive skin and skin structure infections, was compared with standard comparators (cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin) in one USA and one international trial. These two randomized, open-label trials of virtually identical design enrolled a total of 893 patients (450 quinupristin/dalfopristin, 443 comparator). The majority of patients had erysipelas, traumatic wound infection or clean surgical wound infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated pathogen in both treatment groups and polymicrobial infection was more common in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group than in the comparator group. The clinical success rate (cure plus improvement) in the clinically evaluable population was equivalent between the two treatment groups (68.2% quinupristin/dalfopristin, 70.7% comparator; 95% CI, -10.1, 5.1) despite a shorter mean duration of treatment for quinupristin/dalfopristin patients. In the bacteriologically evaluable population, by-patient and by-pathogen bacteriological eradication rates were somewhat lower for quinupristin/dalfopristin (65.8% and 66.6%, respectively) than for the comparator regimens (72.7% and 77.7%, respectively). The lower bacteriological response rates in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group were, in part, due to a higher rate of polymicrobial infections and a higher incidence of patients classified as clinical failure, a category which included premature discontinuation of treatment because of local venous adverse events. The bacteriological eradication rate for quinupristin/dalfopristin was higher in monomicrobial infections than in polymicrobial infections (72.6% versus 63.3%, respectively), whereas the corresponding rate for the comparator regimens was lower for monomicrobial infections than polymicrobial infections (70.8% versus 83.1%). This finding was not unexpected, since the spectrum of quinupristin/dalfopristin is focused on gram-positive pathogens and additional antibiotics to treat gram-negative bacteria were not required per protocol. The systemic tolerability of both treatment regimens was qualitatively similar. A higher rate of drug-related venous adverse events was reported for quinupristin/dalfopristin (66.2%) than for the comparator regimen (28.4%). Premature discontinuation of study drug was primarily due to adverse clinical events for quinupristin/dalfopristin (19.1%), whereas the most common reason for discontinuation among those receiving the comparator regimens was treatment failure (11.5%). Quinupristin/dalfopristin is an effective alternative for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections due to quinupristin/ dalfopristin-susceptible gram-positive organisms, including methicillin- and erythromycin-resistant S. aureus.

An overview of mortality risk prediction in sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To review the evolution and development of mortality risk prediction methods as they have been applied to the management of septic patients.

DATA SOURCES

Selected relevant articles from the pertinent literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Theoretical and clinical data on the mortality risk identification, severity of illness scoring systems, and cytokine levels as they relate to mortality in patients with sepsis.

DATA EXTRACTION

All concepts relating to mortality risk prediction, cytokines, severity of illness, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality were explored and interrelated accordingly.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In order to improve the precision of the evaluation of new therapies for the treatment of sepsis, to monitor their utilization and to refine their indications, it has been recommended that mortality risk stratification or severity of illness scoring systems be utilized in clinical trials and in practice. With the increasing influence of managed care on healthcare delivery, there will be an increased demand for techniques to stratify patients for cost-effective allocation of care. Severity of illness scoring systems are widely utilized for patient stratification in the management of cancer and heart disease. However, the use of such systems in patients with sepsis has been limited to application in clinical trial design for assurance of balance among treatment groups. Mortality risk prediction in sepsis has evolved from identification of risk factors, and simple counts of failing organs, to sophisticated techniques that mathematically transform a raw score, comprised of physiologic and/or clinical data, into a predicted risk of death. Most of the developed systems are based on global ICU populations rather than upon sepsis patient databases. A few, newer systems are derived from such databases. However, the overall discriminating ability of the various methods is similar. Mortality prediction has also been carried out from assessments of endotoxin or cytokine (interleukin-1, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor) plasma concentrations. While increased levels of these substances have been correlated with increased mortality, difficulties with bioassay and their sporadic appearance in the bloodstream prevent these measurements from being practically applied. The calibration of risk prediction methods comparing predicted with actual mortality across the breadth of risk for a population of patients is excellent, but overall accuracy in individual patient predictions is such that clinical judgment must remain a major part of decision-making. However, as databases of appropriate patient information increase in size and complexity, it may be possible in the future to devise a scoring system that can be relied on to assist in clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of illness scoring systems are widely used in critically ill patients. However, their use in patients with sepsis has largely been limited to a means of stratification in clinical trials. As newer sepsis therapies become available, it may be possible to use such systems for refining their indications, and monitoring their utilization. Finally, as the databases supporting the systems increase in size and complexity, it may be possible to utilize them in clinical decision-making.

Review of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and clinical efficacy of cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, microbiology, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerance of cefprozil, a new, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin.

DATA SOURCES

Published clinical trials and microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and safety data were identified by MEDLINE; additional references were derived from bibliographies of these articles; microbiologic data on file were provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

STUDY SELECTION

Only published comparative clinical trial reports are included in the review of clinical efficacy. Noncomparative clinical data pertaining to uses of cefprozil not approved by the Food and Drug Administration are not included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data are presented on the in vitro microbiologic activity of cefprozil against 10,152 bacterial isolates, including most of the clinically important streptococci (e.g., Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae), beta-lactamase-positive and -negative Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Clostridium difficile, and numerous other gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. In clinical trials, cefprozil appears to be at least as effective as commonly used comparison agents such as cefaclor, cefixime, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Additionally, cefprozil is better tolerated than the latter two agents, especially with regard to gastrointestinal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefprozil is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin that provides coverage against both gram-negative and -positive bacteria that may cause otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, skin and skin-structure infections, secondary bacterial infection of acute bronchitis, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil appears to exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for some important pathogens. Cefprozil is used primarily for second-line treatment as less-expensive, first-line generic alternatives generally are available. Cefprozil demonstrates clinical advantages over many other orally administered beta-lactam antibiotics in terms of antimicrobial spectrum, a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen, and/or reduced incidence of adverse effects.

Ciprofloxacin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae infection in a patient with chronic lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of ciprofloxacin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae infection in a patient with chronic lung disease who was exposed to multiple courses of antimicrobial therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient suffered recurrent pulmonary infections and developed bronchiectasis as a consequence of longstanding, severe, combined immunodeficiency disease. He had received ciprofloxacin on several occasions for treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent pulmonary infections. On a recent admission his usual H. influenzae isolate, which had been highly susceptible to ciprofloxacin (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] < or = 0.06 mg/L) on previous admissions, was resistant to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin (MIC 8 and 16 mg/L, respectively). The patient responded to treatment with ceftizoxime and was discharged with oral cefixime, which was to be taken for a total of two weeks.

DISCUSSION

Rare isolates of H. influenzae resistant to ofloxacin and lomefloxacin have been noted in Europe and Asia; however, none resistant to the fluoroquinolones have been previously reported in the US, and no resistance has been reported to ciprofloxacin. We believe that repetitive, cycling exposure to ciprofloxacin may have induced the resistance that developed in this patient's flora.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones may be added to the list of drugs to which H. influenzae have become resistant. Only judicious use of these drugs will preserve their activity against important pathogens in community-acquired infections.

Therapeutic decisions: assessing clinical fit

Quality health care has been defined as the maximization of desired outcomes while minimizing undesirable consequences. Therefore, the optimal antimicrobial agent for a given clinical condition will be one that is the most rapidly effective, produces the least patient discomfort, results in minimal disruption of the patient's or hospital flora, and causes minimal dissatisfaction with the treatment program and its attendant costs. The clinical utility of antimicrobials is generally judged on the basis of in vitro activity, kinetic disposition, resistance trends, safety, and cost. Fluoroquinolones possess characteristics in each of these areas; for example, broad, potent gram-negative spectrum coupled with excellent oral absorption and tissue penetration, and relative safety and reduced cost compared with parenteral therapy. Drawbacks include the emergence of resistance among certain bacteria, particularly staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, drug interactions that may compromise efficacy, and greater cost than other potentially useful oral antimicrobial agents. Indications for the agents' use can be categorized as appropriate (gram-negative osteomyelitis, complicated urinary tract infection, prostatitis, certain sexually transmitted diseases, bacterial gastroenteritis), potential (gastrointestinal tract decontamination in granulocytopenic patients, exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nosocomial pneumonia and bacteremia, eradication of certain bacterial carrier states), or inappropriate (community-acquired pulmonary infections, especially aspiration pneumonitis, serious gram-positive infections, uncomplicated urinary tract infection, surgical prophylaxis except prostatic surgery). Gram-negative osteomyelitis serves as a model to demonstrate the fluoroquinolones as agents for quality health care. Current and future investigations should focus on the cost effectiveness and cost utility of the agents.

The economic impact of HA-1A (Centoxin) against endotoxin

Monoclonal antibodies have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in selected subsets of patients with Gram-negative sepsis and/or septic shock. However, the acquisition costs of the antibody products are expected to be in the range of $US3500 to $US4000 per course of therapy and precise identification of patients who will benefit may be difficult. Therefore, the economic impact of these antibodies will be significant. We have performed a model cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis specific to our institution based on previously reported mortality figures. Our data suggest that the cost-effectiveness of HA-1A (Centoxin) will be comparable with that of a variety of commonly used medical interventions, but will produce an incremental increase in costs of at least $US7000 per patient because of the acquisition cost of the drug, as well as an increase in numbers of survivors whose hospitalisation will be prolonged.

Serum and blister fluid pharmacokinetics and bactericidal activities of ampicillin-sulbactam, cefotetan, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and ticarcillin-clavulanate

Ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and ceftizoxime are promoted for the treatment of mixed aerobic-anaerobic bacterial infections. Their activities have been compared in vitro but not in vivo. In order to assess the in vivo activities of these agents in serum and interstitial fluid, we administered single, intravenous doses of these antimicrobial agents to healthy subjects. Concentrations of the antimicrobial agents in serum and suction-induced blister fluid and bactericidal activity were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and the standard methodology of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, respectively. The organisms used for bactericidal activity tests were one isolate each of Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Bacteroides fragilis. Pharmacokinetic parameters in serum and blister fluid were similar to those derived in other investigations. Of note were the high and prolonged concentrations of ticarcillin and cefotetan in blister fluid, despite high-level serum protein binding. The bactericidal activities in serum and blister fluid reflected the relative in vitro activities and kinetic dispositions of the various antimicrobial agents except for the bactericidal activity of cefotetan, which was substantially lower in blister fluid than serum, despite a blister fluid:serum area under the concentration-time curve ratio of 1.5. Similarly, the activity of ticarcillin-clavulanate in blister fluid was also substantially less than would have been predicted by the blister fluid:serum ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve of 1.1, possibly because of the low concentrations of clavulanate in blister fluid. The rankings of the in vivo bactericidal activities of the five drugs were as follows: for S. aureus, ampicillin-sulbactam > ticarcillin-clavulanate > ceftizoxime > cefoxitin > cefotetan; for K. pneumoniae, ceftizoxime > cefotetan > ampicillin-sulbactam = ticarcillin-clavulanate > cefoxitin; and for B.fragilis, ticarcillin-clavulanate > cefotetan > ceftizoxime > ampicillin-sulbactam = cefoxitin.

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil

Cefprozil is a new orally administered cephalosporin with a spectrum of in vitro activity similar to that of cefuroxime. The pharmacokinetics of cefprozil are linear relative to dose size. Gastrointestinal absorption produces maximal plasma concentrations of approximately 10 mg/L 1-2 hours after administration of an oral dose of 500 mg. Approximately 94% of the dose is absorbed, and 60%-70% is excreted in the urine as unchanged drug. The renal clearance exceeds the glomerular filtration rate, thus suggesting active tubular secretion. Administration with food or antacids produces negligible effects on the rate or extent of absorption. Kinetic disposition in the elderly is similar to that in young healthy individuals, but elimination is slightly slower in infants and children. Because renal impairment, but not hepatic dysfunction, significantly reduces the elimination of cefprozil, it is recommended that the dosage be reduced by 50% in patients whose creatinine clearance is less than 30 mL/min. Penetration of the interstitial fluid by cefprozil is excellent, with concentrations approaching those observed in the plasma. The pharmacokinetic disposition of cefprozil, coupled with its in vitro activity, supports the use of once- or twice-daily dosage regimens.

Gram-negative sepsis, the sepsis syndrome, and the role of antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies

The incidence and mortality, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and management of sepsis and the sepsis syndrome are reviewed, and the use of antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies to treat patients with sepsis is discussed. The sepsis syndrome and septic shock are induced by the presence of endotoxin, a lipopolysaccharide found in the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Proper management of gram-negative sepsis includes appropriate antimicrobial therapy, fluids and electrolytes, nutritional support, administration of vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation if necessary. To date, two antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies have been produced and subjected to extensive clinical testing. HA-1A, a human cell line-derived monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody that contains only a small fragment of murine protein, was tested in one trial. HA-1A significantly reduced mortality in patients with sepsis and gram-negative bacteremia and produced better resolution of major morbidities than placebo in those patients. E5, an IgM antibody produced entirely via murine monoclonal antibody technology, was evaluated in two trials. Results from the first trial showed that E5 significantly reduced mortality in patients with gram-negative infection who were not in refractory shock. In contrast, results from the second trial did not show any significant reduction in mortality among patients with gram-negative infection who received E5. However, resolution of major morbidities occurred more frequently among E5 recipients in both trials. HA-1A and E5 were both well tolerated in the trials. The cost of therapy is expected to be $3000-$4000 per treatment course. The antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies represent the next step along the path toward important reductions in morbidity and mortality from gram-negative infection. However, the financial implications of the use of HA-1A and E5 are enormous, and stringent patient selection criteria for administration of these products will have to be developed.

Pharmacokinetic disposition and bactericidal activities of cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone in serum and blister fluid

Cefepime is a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin with excellent gram-positive and gram-negative activity including activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae. The pharmacokinetic disposition of cefepime is similar to that of ceftazidime. We compared the pharmacokinetic characteristics and the extent and duration of bactericidal activity in serum and suction-induced blister fluid after single 2-g intravenous doses of cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone given to healthy subjects. One clinical isolate each of E. cloacae, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus was used to assess bactericidal activity. Results of the pharmacokinetic analysis were similar to previously reported data for these drugs. The high serum protein binding of cefoperazone (approximately 90%) contributed to poor blister fluid penetration. The other drugs penetrated well into this fluid compartment. Cefepime showed significantly greater bactericidal activity in serum and blister fluid against E. cloacae than the other study drugs, ceftazidime was significantly better in serum and blister fluid against P. aeruginosa, and cefoperazone was significantly better against S. aureus only in serum. None of the study drugs had significant bactericidal activity in blister fluid against S. aureus. Cefepime is a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of infections due to E. cloacae.

Formulary evaluation of second-generation cephamycin derivatives using decision analysis

Use of decision analysis in the formulary evaluation of the second-generation cephamycin derivatives cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefmetazole is described. The rating system used was adapted from one used for the third-generation cephalosporins. Data on spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, adverse reactions, cost, and stability were taken from the published literature and the FDA-approved product labeling. The weighting scheme used for the third-generation cephalosporins was altered somewhat to reflect the more important aspects of the cephamycin derivatives and their potential role in surgical prophylaxis. Sensitivity analysis was done to assess the variability of the final scores when the assigned weights were varied within a reasonable range. Scores for cefmetazole and cefotetan were similar and did not differ significantly after sensitivity analysis. Cefoxitin scored significantly lower than the other two drugs. In the absence of data suggesting that the N-methyl thiotetrazole side chains of cefmetazole and cefotetan cause substantial toxicity, these two drugs can be considered the most cost-efficient members of the second-generation cephamycins.

Development of resistance to fleroxacin during therapy of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

The efficacy of fleroxacin was compared with that of vancomycin by using the rabbit model of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Animals received intravenous therapy with fleroxacin, 30 mg/kg every 8 h, or vancomycin, 17.5 mg/kg every 6 h, for 4 days. Both antimicrobial agents effectively cleared bacteremia and significantly reduced bacterial counts in vegetations and tissues compared with those in untreated controls. However, resistance to fleroxacin at 5- and 10-fold the MIC arose in the test strain of S. aureus in 73 and 27%, respectively, of animals that received the drug. Resistant isolates were found mainly in vegetations and were composed of up to 7% of the residual population recovered from that site. We conclude that fleroxacin is as effective as vancomycin in this model of a serious systemic S. aureus infection, but resistance to the drug may develop during therapy. If similar results are found with other strains of S. aureus during therapy with this or other fluoroquinolones, such data, when they are combined with the high incidence of fluoroquinolone resistance among S. aureus isolates being reported from selected institutions, would support the contention that these drugs should not be used as first-line therapeutic agents for S. aureus infections.

Alteration in the pharmacokinetic disposition of ciprofloxacin by simultaneous administration of azlocillin

Healthy subjects were given single intravenous doses of ciprofloxacin, azlocillin, and the two drugs simultaneously on separate occasions. High-pressure liquid chromatographic analysis was used to assay the concentrations of both drugs in serum and urine. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. The total body (CL), renal (CLR), and nonrenal (CLNR) clearances; steady-state volume of distribution (Vss); and fractional urinary excretion of ciprofloxacin were all markedly decreased with the simultaneous administration of azlocillin. The disposition of azlocillin was unchanged when it was given with ciprofloxacin compared to when it was given alone. The pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- standard deviation) of ciprofloxacin given alone versus in combination with azlocillin were as follows: CL, 52.2 +/- 9.2 versus 33.9 +/- 6.0 liters/h (P less than 0.0005); CLR, 26.5 +/- 4.8 versus 16.2 +/- 4.2 liters/h (P less than 0.0005); CLNR, 25.8 +/- 5.5 versus 17.7 +/- 4.0 liters/h (P less than 0.03); Vss, 224 +/- 30 versus 166 +/- 41 liters (P less than 0.01); fractional urinary excretion, 0.56 +/- 0.06 versus 0.43 +/- 0.04 (P less than 0.002), respectively. This interaction resulted in significantly higher and more prolonged concentrations of ciprofloxacin in serum, which may be beneficial in the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections, but it could also produce greater toxicity or result in more pronounced effects on oxidative drug metabolism of other medications.

Serum bactericidal activity from intravenous ciprofloxacin and azlocillin given alone and in combination to healthy subjects

Ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin have been shown to exhibit in vitro synergy versus a variety of organisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study examined this interaction in vivo, testing serum bactericidal activity (SBA) in six healthy male subjects after intravenous administration of ciprofloxacin 4 mg/kg (C), azlocillin 60 mg/kg (A), and the two simultaneously (C/A). Eight different organisms were tested: four isolates of P. aeruginosa with varying susceptibilities to C and A, and one isolate each of Escherichia coli (EC), Staphylococcus aureus (SA) Serratia marcescens (SM), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), all of which were susceptible to both drugs. Blood samples were collected at the end of 30-min infusions and at 4 and 8 hr. Reciprocal titers were plotted versus time and area under the bactericidal titer curve (AUBC) calculated to assess antibacterial interactions. Results indicated that P. aeruginosa-1 (PA-1), EC, and KP were synergistically killed by C/A. AUBC for PA-1 were C = 36, A = 11, C/A = 144, p less than 0.05. AUBC for EC were C = 1059, A = 180, C/A = 1504, p = 0.05. AUBC for KP were C = 327, A = 97, C/A = 584, p = 005. Additive effects were demonstrated versus all of the other organisms except Serratia marcescens, where an indifferent effect was observed. Ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin may be a useful combination of the treatment of selected Gram-negative bacillary infections.

Efficacy of ofloxacin in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

The efficacy of ofloxacin was compared with that of vancomycin in the therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Rabbits infected with either a methicillin-susceptible (MSSA-1199) or a methicillin-resistant (MRSA-494) test strain were treated with ofloxacin (20 mg/kg of body weight every 8 h) or vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h) for 4 days. The antimicrobial agents were found to be equally effective in clearing bacteremia and in reducing bacterial counts in vegetations and in renal and splenic tissue of animals infected with either test strain. The drugs were of equal efficacy in curing MRSA-494 endocarditis. No resistance to ofloxacin emerged in either test strain during therapy. We conclude that in this model ofloxacin is as efficacious as vancomycin and that, unlike for other fluoroquinolones we have evaluated, resistance to the drug does not develop during therapy of this serious S. aureus infection.

Ciprofloxacin and rifampin, alone and in combination, for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

The therapeutic activities of ciprofloxacin (25 mg/kg every 8 h), rifampin (10 mg/kg every 24 h), ciprofloxacin plus rifampin, and vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg every 6 h) were compared by using the rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Animals infected with one of two test strains (SA1199 or SA487) were randomized into treatment groups and received 6 days of therapy. For SA1199, ciprofloxacin plus rifampin was most effective at reducing vegetation bacterial counts. For SA487, ciprofloxacin plus rifampin was as effective as vancomycin but less effective than ciprofloxacin alone. Resistance to ciprofloxacin at 5- and 10-fold the MIC emerged in the test strain in 82 and 55%, respectively, of rabbits infected with SA1199 and receiving ciprofloxacin monotherapy. The combination of ciprofloxacin and rifampin decreased these frequencies to 60% (P = 0.27) and 10% (P = 0.04). No resistance to ciprofloxacin was found in rabbits infected with SA487. We conclude that ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin plus rifampin are as efficacious as vancomycin in this model and that combining rifampin with ciprofloxacin may decrease the frequency at which high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin emerges. However, with respect to improved efficacy, the combination of ciprofloxacin and rifampin is unpredictable and may be detrimental.

Influence of coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin and cefotaxime in healthy volunteers and in patients with renal failure

The pharmacokinetic disposition of cefotaxime, desacetyl cefotaxime, and mezlocillin after the administration of each drug singly and in combination was examined in eight healthy volunteers and in five anuric patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the presence of ESRD, the total body clearance of cefotaxime decreased from 256.7 +/- 41.5 to 65.4 +/- 42.0 ml/min, and its elimination half-life (t1/2) increased from 1.1 to 3.6 hours as compared with healthy volunteers. Concomitant administration of mezlocillin in healthy volunteers decreased the total body clearance of cefotaxime by 42% and increased its steady-state volume of distribution. This reduction in clearance was reflected by a decrease in both renal and nonrenal clearances. In the presence of ESRD, coadministration of mezlocillin increased the t1/2 of cefotaxime to 5.8 hours. Desacetyl cefotaxime accumulated in ESRD with a prolongation of its elimination t1/2 to 18.7 hours from 1.7 hours in healthy volunteers. Desacetyl cefotaxime peak plasma concentrations occurred later with the combination regimen in the presence of ESRD. The clearance of mezlocillin was reduced and t1/2 prolonged in ESRD from 194.6 +/- 31.9 to 76.4 +/- 38.8 ml/min and 1.4 to 2.3 hours, respectively. Concomitant administration of cefotaxime did not alter the pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin. These data suggest that in the presence of normal renal function, lower doses of cefotaxime may be adequate to maintain similar cefotaxime plasma concentrations when mezlocillin is coadministered compared to when cefotaxime is given alone. Additional pharmacodynamic and clinical studies with this combination are warranted to further elucidate the clinical impact of this pharmacokinetic interaction.

Enhanced elimination of ciprofloxacin after multiple-dose administration of rifampin to rabbits

The combination of ciprofloxacin and rifampin is potentially useful for the treatment of selected infections. However, rifampin may induce the metabolism of ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin was given in single doses to healthy rabbits before and after six daily doses of intramuscular rifampin. Total clearance of ciprofloxacin increased from 0.96 +/- 0.32 (standard deviation) to 1.57 +/- 0.63 liters/h per kg (P less than 0.05). This change in elimination is potentially significant for the outcome of experimental infections in rabbits.

Efficacy of fleroxacin in experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

The efficacy of fleroxacin versus that of vancomycin was assessed by using the rabbit model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Animals were treated with fleroxacin (30 mg/kg of body weight every 8 h) or vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg every 6 h) for 4 days. These antimicrobial agents were equally effective in clearing bacteremia, reducing bacterial counts in vegetations and tissues, and curing endocarditis. However, resistance to fleroxacin at fivefold the MIC arose in the test strain of S. aureus in 8% of animals that received the drug. We conclude that fleroxacin is as efficacious as vancomycin in this model of a serious systemic S. aureus infection, but modest resistance to fleroxacin may develop during therapy.

Imipenem monotherapy versus combination therapy in the management of mixed bacterial infection: a critical appraisal

There has been a great deal of interest in the use of imipenem monotherapy rather than combinations of antimicrobials for mixed bacterial infections. A review of the published comparative studies of imipenem versus combinations in serious mixed bacterial infections indicated that, overall, imipenem is at least as effective as, and maybe less expensive than, the combinations tested. Several studies suggest that clinical response to imipenem is more rapid than to the comparison regimens; however, other factors may have influenced these values, and the numbers of patients in these reports were small. Imipenem is devoid of the adverse effects associated with aminoglycosides. Other adverse effects, including superinfection and central nervous system toxicity, were similar for imipenem and the comparison regimens. Meta-analysis of the published reports and abstracts revealed that imipenem is as effective as combination regimens for the treatment of serious mixed bacterial infection.

Effect of protein binding on serum bactericidal activities of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in healthy volunteers

The effect of protein binding on antibiotic efficacy is controversial. The pharmacologic effect of an antibiotic is believed to be related to its unbound concentration at the site of infection. It is unknown whether antibiotics with a low degree of serum protein binding are clinically superior to antibiotics that are highly protein bound. In a randomized, crossover investigation, the serum bactericidal activities of a single dose of ceftazidime (30 mg/kg) and cefoperazone (30 mg/kg) were studied in six healthy volunteers against three clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which both antibiotics had similar MICs and MBCs. Serum samples were collected over 12 h. The total and unbound antibiotic concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Mean peak total concentrations of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in serum were 101.7 +/- 18.6 and 264.1 +/- 149.6 micrograms/ml, respectively. Due to its lower protein binding (21 +/- 6%), ceftazidime had significantly higher unbound concentrations in serum than did the highly bound cefoperazone (91.5 +/- 2%). Mean peak unbound concentrations were 78.5 +/- 12.5 and 24.2 +/- 17.8 micrograms/ml for ceftazidime and cefoperazone, respectively. The unbound concentration of ceftazidime at each sampling time was higher than that of cefoperazone. Although total concentrations were consistently higher than the MICs, serum containing cefoperazone showed minimal bactericidal activity against the isolates. In contrast, despite lower total concentrations, ceftazidime had greater antibacterial activity than cefoperazone. Serum bactericidal activity was more closely related to unbound rather than total antibiotic concentrations. Our data support the concept that only the unbound drug is microbiologically active.

The emergence of resistance to ciprofloxacin during treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

The efficacy of ciprofloxacin was compared with that of vancomycin in the rabbit model of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Animals were treated with ciprofloxacin, 25 mg/kg iv every 8 h or vancomycin, 17.5 mg/kg iv every 6 h, for 3, 6, or 9 days. Both drugs were found to be equally effective in the therapy of this infection, but the degree of reduction in bacterial counts was less than expected on the basis of previous studies. Additionally, resistance to ciprofloxacin in the test strain of S. aureus was seen to emerge in 12.5% of animals that received the drug. This raises concern about the use of ciprofloxacin as a single agent in the therapy of humans with serious systemic S. aureus infections.

Altered pharmacokinetic disposition of ciprofloxacin and vancomycin after single and multiple doses in rabbits

The pharmacokinetic disposition of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin was assessed in rabbits before the efficacy of these compounds in experimental staphylococcal endocarditis was compared. Ciprofloxacin was given in single intravenous bolus doses of 25 and 35 mg/kg and also in a multiple-dose regimen of 35 mg/kg every 6 h. Vancomycin was given in a similar manner in single doses of 17.5 and 25 mg/kg and in a multiple-dose regimen of 17.5 mg/kg every 6 h. Serum was sampled frequently after injections and analyzed by microbiologic assay for drug concentration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of clearance and steady-state volume of distribution were calculated by compartment-independent methods. These studies revealed that clearance of ciprofloxacin was reduced significantly after multiple doses (7.42 +/- 0.85 [standard deviation] versus 6.09 +/- 0.71 liters/h, P less than 0.01). Although the half-life and volume of distribution increased after multiple dosing, the differences were not statistically significant. The disposition of vancomycin following single doses was significantly altered after the 25-mg/kg dose compared with the 17.5-mg/kg dose. Half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution changed from 1.27 +/- 0.2 to 1.60 +/- 0.21 h (P less than 0.05), 0.54 +/- 0.05 to 0.39 +/- 0.04 liters/h (P less than 0.01), and 0.37 +/- 0.04 to 0.31 +/- 0.03 liters/kg (P less than 0.05), respectively. The disposition of ciprofloxacin was not altered with increases in dose size, and the disposition of vancomycin was not altered after multiple doses. If such alterations in the pharmacokinetic disposition of antimicrobial agents are unanticipated, the higher and more prolonged than expected serum concentrations may have an effect on the outcome of experimental infections.

Effect of dose on pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity of mezlocillin

Mezlocillin is subject to dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. Previous studies have examined the pharmacokinetic but not the pharmacodynamic aspects of this effect. The pharmacokinetic disposition of mezlocillin was determined in eight healthy volunteers in a randomized, crossover fashion after single infusions of 50 and 80 mg of mezlocillin per kg of body weight. Plasma and urine were assayed with a specific high-pressure liquid chromatography assay and analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Pharmacodynamic (bactericidal) effects were evaluated from serial serum bactericidal titers obtained after each dose by using the area under the bactericidal activity curve method. The mean mezlocillin total body clearance decreased from 203.6 +/- 36.2 ml/min after the 50-mg/kg dose to 171.7 +/- 42.1 ml/min after the 80-mg/kg dose (P, 0.01). The decreased clearance was reflected by a decrease in nonrenal clearance only (108.9 +/- 20.0 to 77.9 +/- 23.5 ml/min, respectively; P, 0.001). Mean areas under the curve for concentration in plasma versus time normalized to the 50-mg/kg dose were 314 +/- 73 and 375 +/- 64 micrograms X h/ml for the low and high doses, respectively (P, 0.01). No significant changes were observed in the steady-state volume of distribution or elimination half-life. Mean areas under the bactericidal activity curve were 100 +/- 77 and 244 +/- 143 for the 50- and 80-mg/kg doses, respectively. The decrease in mezlocillin clearance and the disproportionate increase in the area under the curve for concentration in plasma versus time, coupled with the observed prolonged bactericidal effects of the 80-mg/kg dose, lend support for administration of mezlocillin at a higher dose less frequently (e.g., 5 g every 8 h). Clinical trials with the higher-dose regimen are warranted to validate these observations.

Economic impact of oral ciprofloxacin. A pharmacist's perspective

With increasing numbers of patients covered under diagnostic-related group or prospective payment systems, there is mounting pressure to reduce the costs associated with caring for patients while maintaining the quality of care. New, broad-spectrum, parenteral antimicrobial agents are a prime target for cost control. The availability of an orally administered drug that is effective in a variety of serious infections would have a significant impact on cost reduction in hospitals. A significant proportion of the cost of parenteral drug therapy is associated with labor, supplies, and equipment. An orally administered drug would obviate these costs. Additionally, iatrogenic problems associated with parenteral therapy (e.g., phlebitis) would be avoided, the quantities of expensive parenteral drugs purchased might be reduced, and the duration of hospitalization for selected diseases such as osteomyelitis would probably decrease. Finally, the ease of oral administration may allow longer courses of therapy for resistant infections than have heretofore been possible. Oral ciprofloxacin and similar compounds present both opportunities and challenges for pharmacists. The fiscal impact may be beneficial for the hospital in terms of cost reductions for drug purchases and in expediting discharge for prolonged courses of outpatient therapy. The magnitude of cost reductions will vary substantially depending upon the types of patients and infections managed in a given institution. The challenge for pharmacists is to assure that these valuable compounds, as well as all antimicrobial agents, are appropriately utilized to avoid the offsetting costs of adverse effects, superinfection, unnecessary use, and the development of resistance.

Ciprofloxacin versus vancomycin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis

We compared the efficacy of ciprofloxacin with that of vancomycin by using the rabbit model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Endocarditis was treated with ciprofloxacin (25 mg/kg [body weight] intravenously every 8 h) or vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg intravenously every 6 h) for 3 days. Vancomycin and ciprofloxacin were equally efficacious in clearing bacteremia. Both reduced vegetation bacterial counts by 5 log10 CFU/g and renal and splenic bacterial counts by more than 3 log10 CFU/g as compared with untreated control rabbits after 26 h of infection (P less than 0.001). Both antimicrobial agents were able to eradicate the infectious process in an equivalent proportion of animals. No methicillin-resistant S. aureus that was recovered from ciprofloxacin-treated rabbits developed resistance to ciprofloxacin during therapy. Peak concentrations of ciprofloxacin in the sera of rabbits with endocarditis were significantly higher than those predicted by single-dose studies in uninfected rabbits. This finding was likely due to changes in the pharmacokinetics of the drug with multiple dosing and in infected versus uninfected rabbits. This study demonstrated that intravenously administered ciprofloxacin is as efficacious as vancomycin is in an in vivo model of a serious systemic methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection.

Therapy of choice for the empiric treatment of the febrile neutropenic patient

Patients who become neutropenic secondary to chemotherapy for malignancy are at high risk for bacterial infection. Since the most common organisms include enteric gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci, drug combinations have traditionally been used. In addition, available clinical evidence suggests that synergistic drug combinations are most effective in the treatment of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Comparative clinical trials have not shown any particular drug combination to be superior to others tested. Therefore, the drug choice for the combination should be based on local susceptibility patterns, clinical experience, and cost. Newer beta-lactam compounds are broader in spectrum and more potent than older drugs, and have been tested as sole agents in this setting. Although results appear promising for drugs such as cefoperazone or ceftazidime, the development of resistance and lack of adequate antistaphylococcal activity preclude routine use of these drugs. Imipenem is currently undergoing clinical trials for this purpose and appears to have the appropriate breadth of spectrum. However, frequent development of resistance among isolates of P. aeruginosa is problematic. At the present time a combination of an aminoglycoside and an extended-spectrum penicillin seems to be the therapy of choice for the febrile, neutropenic patient.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of low- and high-dose ticarcillin

Certain antipseudomonal penicillins, such as mezlocillin, exhibit a nonlinear pharmacokinetic disposition with increasing doses. We evaluated the effect of a single low dose (50 mg/kg) compared with a high dose (80 mg/kg) on the pharmacokinetics of ticarcillin in a crossover trial of eight healthy volunteers. No significant alteration in plasma clearance (130.1 +/- 36.5 versus 120.5 +/- 38.0 ml/min), nonrenal clearance (36.5 +/- 8.4 versus 33.4 +/- 18.5 ml/min), or volume of distribution at steady state (12.8 +/- 3.5 versus 12.3 +/- 4.5 liters) was observed between the low- and high-dose regimens, respectively. The elimination half-life remained unchanged between the two doses (67.9 +/- 14.3 versus 68.0 +/- 12.2 min). Unlike other newer antipseudomonal penicillins, ticarcillin did not display dose-dependent pharmacokinetic behavior with the range of doses used in the clinical setting.

Prevention and management of enterococcal infection: cost implications

Enterococcal infections are becoming increasingly prevalent, in part because of the widespread use of cephalosporins and a greater number of immunosuppressed patients. Most infections where enterococci are isolated are pelvic or intraabdominal. The actual pathogenic role of the enterococcus remains controversial, since many types of organisms are usually cultured as well. Although specific therapy directed at the enterococcus may not always be necessary, reasonable indications for specific therapy include the presence of shock, immunosuppression, or persistent or recurrent infection. Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with a mortality rate in excess of 40 percent. This entity, as well as enterococcal endocarditis and meningitis, should be treated with bactericidal, combination antibiotic therapy, which includes a penicillin and an aminoglycoside. Mixed infections probably can be treated with a penicillin alone. Penicillin-allergic patients should be treated with vancomycin. The costs of nosocomial infection or superinfection are very high; costs incurred as a result of enterococcal infection or superinfection may be prevented by avoiding prolonged prophylactic or broad-spectrum therapeutic regimens (such as cephalosporins) that lack antienterococcal activity. Extended-spectrum penicillins may be effective prophylactic regimens for intraabdominal or pelvic procedures and should serve as adequate therapy for mixed infections in these sites.

Controversies in antimicrobial therapy: formulary decisions on third-generation cephalosporins

Factors affecting the admission of antimicrobial agents to hospital formularies are discussed, using third-generation cephalosporins as examples. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy is costly in terms of wasted drugs, ineffective therapy, and drug toxicity. In 1984, 10 of the top 15 drug products (in sales to hospitals) were antimicrobial agents; these accounted for $1 billion in sales. Since third-generation cephalosporins are very similar in terms of spectra, clinical efficacy, and safety, they are useful in illustrating the process a hospital might use in deciding which individual agent to admit to a formulary. Five factors should be considered in formulary evaluations of antimicrobial agents: in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic disposition, adverse effects, clinical efficacy, and total economic impact. As applied to third-generation cephalosporins, this decision analysis leads to the conclusion that these agents should be considered therapeutic alternates. The decision would then rest solely on the institution-specific factors of microbial susceptibility patterns, patient case-mix, and acquisition costs. Antimicrobial agents account for the largest financial expenditure among hospital drug products; a set of these agents should be selected carefully to meet the needs of the individual institution.