1
|
Manceau G, Sabbagh C, Mege D, Lakkis Z, Bege T, Tuech JJ, Benoist S, Lefèvre JH, Karoui M, Bridoux V, Venara A, Beyer‐Berjot L, Codjia T, Dazza M, Gagnat G, Hamel S, Mallet L, Martre P, Philouze G, Roussel E, Tortajada P, Dumaine AS, Heyd B, Paquette B, Brunetti F, Esposito F, Lizzi V, Michot N, Denost Q, Rullier E, Tresallet C, Tetard O, Rivier P, Fayssal E, Collard M, Moszkowicz D, Lupinacci R, Peschaud F, Etienne JC, Loge L, Bege T, Corte H, D’Annunzio E, Humeau M, Issard J, Munoz N, Abba J, Jafar Y, Lacaze L, Sage PY, Susoko L, Trilling B, Arvieux C, Mauvais F, Ulloa‐Severino B, Pitel S, Vauchaussade de Chaumont A, Badic B, Blanc B, Bert M, Rat P, Ortega‐Deballon P, Chau A, Dejeante C, Piessen G, Grégoire E, Alfarai A, Cabau M, David A, Kadoche D, Dufour F, Goin G, Goudard Y, Pauleau G, Sockeel P, Villeon B, Pautrat K, Eveno C, Abdalla S, Couchard AC, Balbo G, Mabrut JY, Bellinger J, Bertrand M, Aumont A, Duchalais E, Messière AS, Tranchart A, Cazauran JB, Pichot‐Delahaye V, Dubuisson V, Maggiori L, Panis Y, Djawad‐Boumediene B, Fuks D, Kahn X, Huart E, Catheline JM, Lailler G, Baraket O, Baque P, Diaz de Cerio JM, Mariol P, Maes B, Fernoux P, Guillem P, Chatelain E, de Saint Roman C, Fixot K, Voron T, Parc Y. Colon sparing resection versus extended colectomy for left-sided obstructing colon cancer with caecal ischaemia or perforation: a nationwide study from the French Surgical Association. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1304-1313. [PMID: 32368856 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM It is not known whether patients with obstructive left colon cancer (OLCC) with caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation (defined as a blowout of the caecal wall related to colonic overdistension) should undergo a (sub)total colectomy (STC) or an ileo-caecal resection with double-barrelled ileo-colostomy. We aimed to compare the results of these two strategies. METHOD From 2000 to 2015, 1220 patients with OLCC underwent surgery by clinicians who were members of the French Surgical Association. Of these cases, 201 (16%) were found to have caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation intra-operatively: 174 patients (87%) underwent a STC (extended colectomy group) and 27 (13%) an ileo-caecal resection with double-end stoma (colon-sparing group). Outcomes were compared retrospectively. RESULTS In the extended colectomy group, 95 patients (55%) had primary anastomosis and 79 (45%) had a STC with an end ileostomy. In the colon-sparing group, 10 patients (37%) had simultaneous resection of their primary tumour with segmental colectomy and an anastomosis which was protected by a double-barrelled ileo-colostomy. The demographic data for the two groups were comparable. Median operative time was longer in the STC group (P = 0.0044). There was a decrease in postoperative mortality (7% vs 12%, P = 0.75) and overall morbidity (56% vs 67%, P = 0.37) including surgical (30% vs 40%, P = 0.29) and severe complications (17% vs 27%, P = 0.29) in the colon-sparing group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Cumulative morbidity included all surgical stages and the rate of permanent stoma was 66% and 37%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION The colon-sparing strategy may represent a valid and safe alternative to STC in OLCC patients with caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Manceau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - C Sabbagh
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - D Mege
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Z Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - T Bege
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, North University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - J J Tuech
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - S Benoist
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bicêtre University Hospital, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - J H Lefèvre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - M Karoui
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manceau G, Mege D, Bridoux V, Lakkis Z, Venara A, Voron T, De Angelis N, Ouaissi M, Sielezneff I, Karoui M, Dazza M, Gagnat G, Hamel S, Mallet L, Martre P, Philouze G, Roussel E, Tortajada P, Dumaine AS, Heyd B, Paquette B, Brunetti F, Esposito F, Lizzi V, Michot N, Denost Q, Tresallet C, Tetard O, Regimbeau JM, Sabbagh C, Rivier P, Fayssal E, Collard M, Moszkowicz D, Peschaud F, Etienne JC, loge L, Beyer L, Bege T, Corte H, D'Annunzio E, Humeau M, Issard J, Munoz N, Abba J, Jafar Y, Lacaze L, Sage PY, Susoko L, Trilling B, Arvieux C, Mauvais F, Ulloa‐Severino B, Lefevre JH, Pitel S, Vauchaussade de Chaumont A, Badic B, Blanc B, Bert M, Rat P, Ortega‐Deballon P, Chau A, Dejeante C, Piessen G, Grégoire E, Alfarai A, Cabau M, David A, Kadoche D, Dufour F, Goin G, Goudard Y, Pauleau G, Sockeel P, De la Villeon B, Pautrat K, Eveno C, Brouquet A, Couchard AC, Balbo G, Mabrut JY, Bellinger J, Bertrand M, Aumont A, Duchalais E, Messière AS, Tranchart A, Cazauran JB, Pichot‐Delahaye V, Dubuisson V, Maggiori L, Djawad‐Boumediene B, Fuks D, Kahn X, Huart E, Catheline JM, Lailler G, Baraket O, Baque P, Diaz de Cerio JM, Mariol P, Maes B, Fernoux P, Guillem P, Chatelain E, de Saint Roman C, Fixot K. Thirty-day mortality after emergency surgery for obstructing colon cancer: survey and dedicated score from the French Surgical Association. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:782-790. [PMID: 30884089 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to define risk factors for postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery for obstructing colon cancer (OCC) and to propose a dedicated score. METHOD From 2000 to 2015, 2325 patients were treated for OCC in French surgical centres by members of the French National Surgical Association. A multivariate analysis was performed for variables with P value ≤ 0.20 in the univariate analysis for 30-day mortality. Predictive performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS A total of 1983 patients were included. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 7%. Multivariate analysis found five significant independent risk factors: age ≥ 75 (P = 0.013), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ III (P = 0.027), pulmonary comorbidity (P = 0.0002), right-sided cancer (P = 0.047) and haemodynamic failure (P < 0.0001). The odds ratio for risk of postoperative death was 3.42 with one factor, 5.80 with two factors, 15.73 with three factors, 29.23 with four factors and 77.25 with five factors. The discriminating capacity in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality was 0.80. CONCLUSION Thirty-day postoperative mortality after emergency surgery for OCC is correlated with age, ASA score, pulmonary comorbidity, site of tumour and haemodynamic failure, with a specific score ranging from 0 to 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Manceau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - D Mege
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - V Bridoux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Z Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - A Venara
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - T Voron
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - N De Angelis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, Université Paris-Est (UEP), Créteil, France
| | - M Ouaissi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - I Sielezneff
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - M Karoui
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
AIM Many surgical approaches have been described for the treatment of low rectovaginal fistulae (LRVF); however, all are associated with a high recurrence rate and a poor function. The Martius flap technique was first described in 1928 and has since been modified for the treatment of LRVF. The aims of this study were to evaluate the short- and long-term results of the Martius flap procedure. METHOD Twenty patients who underwent the Martius flap procedure between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively included. Operative results and morbidity were evaluated. Quality of life (SF-12 score), quality of sexual life [Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score] and anal continence (Wexner score) were determined. RESULTS Crohn's disease was the predominant aetiology (n = 8, 40%). The Martius flap was mostly harvested from the left side (n = 14, 66.7%). The morbidity rate was 15% (n = 3), and the mean hospital stay was 7.7 ± 3.7 days. At a mean follow up of 35 months, the success rate was 65%. Seven patients still had an LRVF: in patients with Crohn's disease the success rate was 50% (4/8). Fifteen patients (75%) answered the three questionnaires. Quality of life score was in the normal range: physical component summary score (PCS: 46.7 ± 9) and mental component summary score (MCS: 44.7 ± 11.3). The median (range) FSFI score was 5 (2-31.7). Eight patients (53%) deemed cured suffered no incontinence. The Wexner score was significantly higher in the presence of a persisting LRVF (2.6 ± 5.5 vs 13.4 ± 3.78) (P = 0.0018). Use of a right-sided flap was associated with a higher success rate (P = 0.0442). CONCLUSION The Martius flap procedure for LRVF, had a success rate of about 60% and a low morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Pitel
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris VI, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rebsomen L, Pitel S, Boubred F, Buffat C, Feuerstein JM, Raccah D, Vague P, Tsimaratos M. C-peptide replacement improves weight gain and renal function in diabetic rats. Diabetes Metab 2006; 32:223-8. [PMID: 16799398 DOI: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70272-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM Recent experimental and clinical data suggest that C-peptide replacement during type 1 diabetes exerts beneficial effects on diabetic nephropathy. The aim of this study was to determine if physiological C-peptide administration in replacement dose during 28 days had beneficial effects on metabolic status and renal functions in type-1 diabetic rats. METHODS Four groups of rats were investigated: a non diabetic group treated with buffer (C group, n=6), three streptozotocin diabetic-induced groups treated with either buffer (D group, n=6), insulin (D-I group, n=6) or rat homologous C-peptide (D-C group, n=6). Weight gain was measured every week. All animals were housed in metabolic cages on day 28 for assessment of metabolic data. Blood and urine samples were collected to allow measurement of plasmatic osmolality, C-peptide concentration, sodium, and glucose losses and proteinuria. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined by creatinine clearance. RESULTS All streptozotocin-treated animals were diabetic. Glycaemic control (mg/dl), was markedly improved in D-I (133+/-65) when compared with either D (547+/-49, P<0.05) or D-C (520+/-48, P<0.05) groups. Conversely, weight gain during the study, was improved in D-I and D-C as compared with D animals (135+/-13 and 41+/-18 vs 18+/-21 respectively), despite different glycaemic control. Diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration (ml/min/kg), urinary protein leakage (g/kg/day), and Na urinary losses (mmol/100 g/day) respectively, were significantly (P<0.05) reduced in D-C (3.95+/-0.6; 0.08+/-0.06; 1.5+/-0.9) in comparison with D (4.95+/-0.8; 0.18+/-0.16; 3.7+/-2.1) and D-I (5+/-0.9; 0.19+/-0.11; 2.7+/-0.8) animals. Plasmatic osmolality was significantly increased in D group whereas there were no differences between C group and D-C group. Food and water intakes, urinary volume as well as urinary glucose losses were not significantly different between D-C and D groups. CONCLUSIONS C-peptide administration in replacement dose to streptozotocin diabetic rats induces weight gain regardless hyperglycaemia or glycosuria. Diabetic animals supplemented with C-peptide exhibit better renal function resulting in reduced urinary sodium waste and protein excretion together with reduction of the diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Rebsomen
- UPRES EA 21-93, Laboratoire de diabétologie, Faculté de Médecine de Marseille, Université de la Méditerranée, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oreopoulos DG, Pitel S, Husdan H, de Veber GA, Rapoport A. Contrasting effect of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis on the inhibition of in vitro calcification by uremic serum. Can Med Assoc J 1974; 110:43-7. [PMID: 4809445 PMCID: PMC1947250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Our findings support the earlier observation of Yendt, Connor and Howard that uremic serum inhibits the calcification of rachitic rat cartilage in vitro. We also confirmed their studies showing that this inhibition is not the consequence of increased levels of serum magnesium or blood urea. In addition, we have shown that aqueous solutions of creatinine and uric acid in concentrations up to 20 mg./100 ml. do not cause any inhibition.Hemodialysis of uremic patients does not change the inhibitory activity of their blood. In contrast, after 24 hours of peritoneal dialysis, the blood of most patients does not inhibit calcification.The inhibitory activity of uremic serum, observed in vitro, may be important in the pathogenesis of osteomalacia in patients with renal failure. Failure of hemodialysis to alter this activity may contribute to the progression of renal osteodystrophy in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
Collapse
|