1
|
Madadian MA, Da Costa LS, Kerai A, Bajwa MS, Rogers SN. Relevance of sarcopenia in elderly patients undergoing surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024; 62:184-190. [PMID: 38272707 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
In the elderly population there is increasing evidence that frailty predicts adverse outcomes better than chronological age. Sarcopenia is an important component of frailty. This study aimed to establish the relevance of sarcopenia in elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing surgery. This retrospective, single-centre, cohort study included patients over the age of 75 years who were diagnosed with OSCC between 2007 and 2016. Cross-sectional imaging of the neck was used to predict the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) using validated equations. Based on established thresholds, patients were categorised as having either a normal or low SMI, indicative of sarcopenia. Sixty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with a low SMI had a longer length of stay (16.9 days vs 9.8 days, p = 0.030); they had more severe complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher (17.6% vs 4.0%, p = 0.042); and their mean Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was also higher (14.1 vs 4.7, p = 0.051). Furthermore, 2/34 patients in the low SMI group died within 30 days of surgery compared with none in the normal SMI group (5.9% vs 0%, p = 0.503). Whilst patients with a low SMI who underwent surgery had lower five-year overall survival, the difference was not statistically significant. This study shows that sarcopenia negatively influences surgical outcomes in elderly patients. Routine measurement of SMI could be an indication for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matin Ali Madadian
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Lara Simoes Da Costa
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Ashwin Kerai
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK
| | - Mandeep S Bajwa
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Maxillofacial Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Birkenhead, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stanford ND, Rogers SN, Richardson D. Impact of patient age on the functional and psychosocial outcomes of orthognathic treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 61:672-678. [PMID: 37863726 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.08.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Orthognathic treatment has been demonstrated to enhance oral function and quality of life. In the UK, prior approval criteria have been trialled to govern the provision of orthognathic surgery within the National Health Service (NHS). These include the patient's age and presence of functional concerns. The purpose of this paper was to examine the outcomes of orthognathic treatment with respect to patient age at the start of treatment. This was a retrospective evaluation of a single surgeon's experience of patients treated for dentofacial deformity over a 17-year period. A total of 118 patients completed pre-treatment and post-treatment questionnaires. There were significant improvements (p < 0.001) in reported functional problems, and in Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and in Anxiety questionnaire scores. There was no difference in outcome when younger and older patients were compared. Orthognathic treatment produced positive functional and psychosocial outcomes irrespective of the patient's age at the start of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky D Stanford
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; The Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK.
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - David Richardson
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dicks C, Rogers SN, Kanatas A, Lowe D, McHale C, Humphris G. Concerns raised by people treated for head and neck cancer: a secondary analysis of audiotaped consultations in a health services follow-up clinic. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:608. [PMID: 37792118 PMCID: PMC10550852 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08059-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE People treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) face various barriers in communicating concerns with consultants. Our aim was to investigate the number of concerns raised between patients using the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) and those who did not. The PCI is a 57-item prompt list used in routine HNC follow-up clinics. Additionally, we aimed to examine whether who initiated the concerns differed between groups and the factors that may predict this initiation. METHODS Secondary data analysis included 67 participants across 15 HNC consultants from specialist cancer centres in Liverpool and Leeds. Seven consultants utilised the PCI and eight did not, assigned by preferential and random assignment. RESULTS Patients in the PCI group raised on average 2.5 more concerns than patients in the non-PCI group (p < .001). There was no significant relationship between group and who initiated the first concern (p = .28). A mixed-effects logistic regression was found to significantly predict who initiated the first concern in consultations (p < .05). DISCUSSION The number of concerns raised by patients increased when the PCI was introduced pre-HNC consultation. A number of factors were shown to predict the number of concerns raised in consultations by both patient and consultant. As concerns may not be raised further following the concern mentioned, we propose that the discussion of concerns needs to be maintained by the clinician throughout the consultation and not solely at the start. CONCLUSION The PCI promoted the sharing of concerns in follow-up consultations between patient and consultant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrie Dicks
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, L39 4QP UK
- Maxillofacial Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Arrowe Park, CH49 5PE UK
| | - Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd., 24 Trinity Place, Mossley, Congleton, Cheshire, CW12 3JB UK
| | - Calum McHale
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - Gerry Humphris
- Division of Population and Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang W, Rogers SN, Kim D. Shared Decision-making Among Clinicians and Patients With Low-risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer-Reply. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:851-852. [PMID: 37410479 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wanding Yang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Dae Kim
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Midgley AW, Levy AR, Rogers SN, Brooker RC, Bryant V, Cherry MG, Lane S, Nugent MM, Price R, Schache AG, Young B, Patterson JM. ACTivity as medicine In Oncology for Head and Neck (ACTIOHN): Protocol for a feasibility study investigating a patient-centred approach to exercise for people with head and neck cancer. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289911. [PMID: 37624789 PMCID: PMC10456155 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Attempts at personalisation of exercise programmes in head and neck cancer (HaNC) have been limited. The main aim of the present study is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of introducing a remotely delivered, fully personalised, collaborative, and flexible approach to prescribing and delivering exercise programmes into the HaNC usual care pathway. METHODS This is a single arm, feasibility study. Seventy patients diagnosed with HaNC will be recruited from two regional HaNC centres in the United Kingdom. Patients will undertake an 8-week exercise programme designed and delivered by cancer exercise specialists. The exercise programme will start any time between the time of diagnosis and up to 8 weeks after completing treatment, depending on patient preference. The content of the exercise programme will be primarily based on patient needs, preferences, and goals, but guided by current physical activity guidelines for people with cancer. The primary outcome measure is retention to the study. Secondary quantitative outcomes are uptake to the exercise programme, different measures of exercise adherence, pre- and post-intervention assessments of fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form), quality of life (SF-36), physical activity levels (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form), and various components of physical fitness. The outcomes of the nested qualitative study are acceptability and feasibility of the intervention evaluated via interviews with patients, health care professionals, and the cancer exercise specialists. Intervention and participant fidelity will be determined using checklists and scrutiny of each patient's logbook and the cancer exercise specialists' meeting notes. Analysis of quantitative data will be via standard summary statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. EXPECTED RESULTS This feasibility study will inform the design and conduct of a future randomised controlled trial. Success will be defined according to a traffic light system for identifying the appropriateness of progression to a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry (ISRCTN82505455).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian W. Midgley
- Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
- Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew R. Levy
- Health Research Institute, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel C. Brooker
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | - Valerie Bryant
- Cancer of Head and Neck Group Experience (CHANGE) Patient and Public Involvement Group, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Gemma Cherry
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Lane
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Michael M. Nugent
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Price
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew G. Schache
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Bridget Young
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne M. Patterson
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, School of Health Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Doughty HC, Hill RA, Riley A, Midgley AW, Patterson JM, Boddy LM, Rogers SN, Maden M, Williams NH. Barriers to and facilitators of physical activity in adults living with and beyond cancer, with special emphasis on head and neck cancer: a systematic review of qualitative and mixed methods studies. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:471. [PMID: 37458858 PMCID: PMC10352410 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07925-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Physical activity can improve health outcomes for cancer patients; however, only 30% of patients are physically active. This review explored barriers to and facilitators of physical activity promotion and participation in patients living with and beyond cancer. Secondary aims were to (1) explore similarities and differences in barriers and facilitators experienced in head and neck cancer versus other cancers, and (2) identify how many studies considered the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on physical activity behaviour. METHODS CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane (CDSR) were searched for qualitative and mixed methods evidence. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool. Thematic synthesis and frequency of reporting were conducted, and results were structured using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour model and Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS Thirty qualitative and six mixed methods studies were included. Socioeconomic characteristics were not frequently assessed across the included studies. Barriers included side effects and comorbidities (physical capability; skills) and lack of knowledge (psychological capability; knowledge). Having a dry mouth or throat and choking concerns were reported in head and neck cancer, but not across other cancers. Facilitators included improving education (psychological capability; knowledge) on the benefits and safety of physical activity. CONCLUSION Educating patients and healthcare professionals on the benefits and safety of physical activity may facilitate promotion, uptakeand adherence. Head and neck cancer patients experienced barriers not cited across other cancers, and research exploring physical activity promotion in this patient group is required to improve physical activity engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah C. Doughty
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Ruaraidh A. Hill
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, L69 3GL Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Riley
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| | - Adrian W. Midgley
- Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP UK
| | - Joanne M. Patterson
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, L69 3GB Liverpool, UK
| | - Lynne M. Boddy
- The Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 2EX UK
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- Head and Neck Centre, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, CH49 5PE UK
| | - Michelle Maden
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, L69 3GL Liverpool, UK
| | - Nefyn H. Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang W, Lee YK, Lorgelly P, Rogers SN, Kim D. Challenges of Shared Decision-making by Clinicians and Patients With Low-risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:452-459. [PMID: 36951823 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance Several international guidelines have endorsed more conservative treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (LRDTC), yet patients are facing more treatment options with similar oncologic outcomes and are expressing feelings of confusion, dissatisfaction, and anxiety. Shared decision-making, which considers the patient's values and preferences along with the most reliable medical evidence, has been proposed to optimize patient satisfaction in the context of the current clinical equipoise. Objectives To understand key individual and behavioral factors affecting the patient and clinician decision-making process in treatment decision for LRDTC. Evidence Review This systematic review and meta-ethnography involved a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL databases for qualitative and mixed-method studies on patient and clinician experiences with the decision-making process for LRDTC treatment. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; meta-ethnography was used for data analysis. Primary and secondary themes of the included studies were extracted, compared, and translated across articles to produce a lines-of-argument synthesis. Findings Of 1081 publications identified, 12 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis produced 4 themes: (1) a bimodal distribution of patient preferences for treatment decisions; (2) clinician anxiety affected equipoise and biased their recommendations; (3) clinicians struggled to identify patient concerns and preferences; and (4) the clinician-patient relationship and psychosocial support were key to shared decision-making but were frequently overlooked. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this systematic review and meta-ethnography emphasize the need for better patient-clinician communication, particularly with respect to eliciting patient concerns and preferences. With an ever-increasing pool of thyroid cancer survivors, future efforts should be directed at establishing and evaluating tools that will aid in shared decision-making for treatment of patients with LRDTC. Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022286395.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanding Yang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Ying Ki Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paula Lorgelly
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences and School of Business, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Birkenhead, UK
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dae Kim
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mehanna H, Carter B, Hartley A, Abou-Foul AK, Brooks J, Jones J, Fresco L, Moss L, Jones TM, Rogers SN, Morton RP. Patient preference for commonly-used, head and neck cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires in the follow-up setting (Determin): A multi-centre randomised controlled trial and mixed methods study. Clin Otolaryngol 2023. [PMID: 37014180 DOI: 10.1111/coa.14054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of life (QoL) assessment forms an integral part of modern cancer care and research. The aim of this study is to determine patients' preferences and willingness to complete commonly used head-and-neck cancer (HNC) QoL questionnaires (QLQs) in routine follow-up clinics. METHODS This is a randomised control trial of 583 subjects from 17 centres during follow-up after treatment for oral, oropharyngeal or laryngeal cancer. Subjects completed three structured validated questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-HN35; FACT-HN and UW-QOL, and an unstructured patient-generated list. The order of questionnaire presentation was randomised, and subjects were stratified by disease site and stage. Patients self-rated the questionnaires they found most helpful to communicate their health concerns to their clinicians. RESULTS Of the 558 respondents, 82% (457) found QLQs useful to communicate their health concerns to their clinician (OR = 15.76; 95% CI 10.83-22.94). Patients preferred the structured disease-specific instruments (OR 8.79; 95% CI 5.99-12.91), while the open list was the most disliked (OR = 4.25; 95% CI 3.04-5.94). There was no difference in preference by treatment modality. More women preferred the FACT-HN (OR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.05-8.62), and patients under 70 preferred EORTC QLQ-HN35 (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.3-7.59). However, only 55% of patients expressed preference to complete questionnaires routinely at the clinic. CONCLUSIONS Most patients found QLQs helpful during their follow-up and 55% supported routine questionnaires in follow-up clinics. Males and people over 70 years old were the least willing to complete the routine questionnaires and preferred shorter questionnaires (e.g., UW-QOL). Women preferred FACT-HN, and younger patients preferred EORTC QLQ-HN35. Reasons for the reluctance to complete questionnaires require elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisham Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ben Carter
- King's Clinical Trials Unit (KCTU), Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
| | - Andrew Hartley
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ahmad K Abou-Foul
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jill Brooks
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - June Jones
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lydia Fresco
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK
| | - Laura Moss
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Road, Cardiff, UK
| | - Terence M Jones
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chesworth BM, Patel K, Redfern J, Watkins CL, Rogers SN, Hackett ML, Walker MF, Lightbody CE. Development of the stroke patient concerns inventory: A modified Delphi study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2023; 32:107053. [PMID: 36958102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stroke survivors often have unmet physical, psychological and/or social concerns. Patient Concerns Inventories (PCIs) have been developed for other health conditions to address concerns. Our objective was to develop a PCI for stroke care. METHODS This was a development study, including Modified Delphi study design, with academic and healthcare professionals with stroke care expertise. In Stage 1, a draft Stroke PCI (Version 1a) was created through identifying patient-reported concerns post-stroke from three previous studies and through expert panel discussions using Nominal Group Technique. In Stage 2, Version 1a was sent to 92 academic and healthcare professionals with stroke care expertise. Participants ranked their top 20 Stroke PCI items in order of importance and provided feedback. Rankings were converted into scores, and, with the feedback, used to amend the Stroke PCI. Two further rounds of feedback followed until consensus was reached between participants. A final draft of the Stroke PCI was created. RESULTS In stage 1, 64 potential Stroke PCI items were generated. In Stage 2, 38 participants (41.3%) responded to the request to rank Stroke PCI items. The three highest ranked items were 'Risk of another stroke', 'Walking', 'Recovery'. After three rounds of feedback and amendments, the final draft of the Stroke PCI consisted of 53 items. CONCLUSIONS A Stroke PCI has been developed using patient-reported concerns in previous studies and input from academic and healthcare professionals. Future work will involve gathering further feedback on the tool and exploring its acceptability and usability in a pilot study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigit M Chesworth
- Public Health, St Helen and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Kulsum Patel
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Redfern
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline L Watkins
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Maree L Hackett
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom; The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Catherine E Lightbody
- Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom; Stroke Service, Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Semple CJ, McKenna G, Parahoo R, Rogers SN, Tiblom Ehrsson Y. Factors that affect quality of life for older people with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 63:102280. [PMID: 36893570 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality of life is a critical aspect in the management of older head and neck cancer patients. It needs to be considered alongside survival benefit, treatment burden, and longer-term outcomes. The purpose was to undertake a systematic review of empirical peer-reviewed studies with a primary focus on factors impacting quality of life for older head and neck cancer patients. METHODS A systematic review, searching 5 electronic databases (PsychoINFO, MEDLINE, CINHAL, Embase, and Scopus) using PRISMA methodology was conducted. Data was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and a narrative synthesis performed. RESULTS Only 10 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two main themes emerged: 1) Impact of head and neck cancer on quality of life domains and 2) quality of life in treatment decision-making. CONCLUSIONS In an era of progressive personalised care, there is an evident need for more qualitative and quantitative studies focusing on quality of life for older head and neck cancer patients. However, older head and neck cancer patients experience notable differences, especially with poorer physical functioning and greater eating and drinking challenges. Quality of life impacts older patients decision-making, treatment planning and intensifies post-treatment support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherith J Semple
- Institute of Nursing & Health Research, Ulster University / Cancer Services, South Eastern Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Gerry McKenna
- Centre for Public Health, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Roisin Parahoo
- Institute of Nursing & Health Research, Ulster University / Cancer Services, South Eastern Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, England, UK
| | - Ylva Tiblom Ehrsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holländer-Mieritz C, Elsborg AMJ, Kristensen CA, Rogers SN, Pappot H, Piil K. Recommendations for a Patient Concerns Inventory specific to patients with head and neck cancer receiving palliative treatment. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:54. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07471-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
12
|
Midgley AW, Levy AR, Cunha FA, Key A, Patterson JM, Rogers SN. Safety and Feasibility of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2022; 43:170-180. [PMID: 36533848 DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assess safety and feasibility of the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for evaluating head and neck cancer (HaNC) survivors. Also compare their cardiorespiratory fitness to age and sex-matched norms and establish current physical activity levels. METHODS Fifty HaNC survivors [29 male; mean (SD) age, 62 (8) years], who had completed treatment up to 1 year previously, were recruited. Participants performed a CPET on a cycle ergometer to symptom-limited tolerance. Participants completed a questionnaire to report contributory factors they perceived as influencing test termination. Physical activity levels were determined using a self-reported physical activity questionnaire. RESULTS Three participants did not complete the CPET because (1) poor fitting mouthpiece and naso-oral mask due to facial disfiguration from surgery; (2) knee pain elicited by cycling; and (3) early CPET termination due to electrocardiogram artefacts. Participants reached a mean peak oxygen uptake that was 34% lower than predicted and the mean (SD) CPET duration of 7:52 (2:29) min:s was significantly lower than the target test duration of 10 min (p < 0.001). Leg muscle aches and/or breathing discomfort were major contributory factors influencing test termination for 78% of participants, compared to 13% for dry mouth/throat and/or drainage in the mouth/throat. No major adverse events occurred. Participants were categorised as 26% active, 8% moderately active, and 66% insufficiently active. CONCLUSION These preliminary data suggest the CPET appears safe and feasible for most HaNC survivors when strict exclusion criteria are applied; however, low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness should be considered when calculating an appropriate ramp rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian W. Midgley
- Department of Sport & Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Research CentreEdge Hill UniversityOrmskirkL39 4QPUK
| | - Andrew R. Levy
- Department of Psychology and Cardiorespiratory Research CentreEdge Hill UniversityOrmskirkL39 4QPUK
| | - Felipe A. Cunha
- Post‐Graduate Program in Exercise Science and Sports, University of Rio de Janeiro StateRio de JaneiroBrazil
| | - Angela Key
- Angela Key, Respiratory LaboratoryLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLower LaneLiverpoolUK
| | - Joanne M. Patterson
- Joanne Patterson, PhD, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, School of Health ScienceUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and MedicineEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP and Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLower LaneLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kanatas A, Lowe D, Rogers SN. The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:5097-5111. [PMID: 35842858 PMCID: PMC9519723 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07499-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) is a condition specific prompt list that was initially developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) and is referred to as the PCI–HN. There have been numerous publications regarding the PCI–HN, since it was first published in 2009. To date, there has not been a review of its development, validation and clinical implications. A collation of relevant papers into key sections allows multidisciplinary teams and researchers to have an overview of the PCI–HN’s background, evaluation and utility. This is essential if colleagues are to have confidence in the tool and be able to reflect on how to optimise its use in clinical practice. Methods Five search engines were used: EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, CINAHL and Handle-on-QOL for the specific term ‘Patient Concerns Inventory’ up to and including 1st February 2022. In addition, an accumulation of PCI–HN data of 507 HNC patients was drawn from previous studies in Liverpool and Leeds between 2007 and 2020 and was analysed specifically for this paper. Results 54 papers relating to the PCI–HN were identified. The review is structured into eight sections: (1) What is the PCI–HN and how does it work; (2) Feasibility and acceptability; (3) Psychometrics; (4) Items selected and frequency (5) Associations with Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and casemix; (6) Other observational studies; (7) Randomised trial evaluation; (8) General discussion and further research. Conclusions As the term PCI is quite ubiquitous and produces many hits when searching the literature, this review provides a very concise and convenient historical context for the PCI–HN and collates the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Simon N. Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP UK
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rowlands CEP, James P, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Patient worry and concern associated with referral on the two-week suspected head and neck pathway. Br Dent J 2022:10.1038/s41415-022-4444-y. [PMID: 35790814 PMCID: PMC9255547 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-4444-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Patient worry and concern of cancer adds to the latent distress associated with referral on the two-week suspected pathway (2WW). For oral cancer, as the conversion rate is in the region of 5-10%, the majority of people will have needless cause for concern.Aim This study aims to report how worried/concerned patients were that the reason for referral might mean that they had cancer and to relate to referral characteristics.Materials/methods All patients referred on the 2WW to two oral and maxillofacial departments in the three months from January to March 2021 were sent a one-off anonymised study-specific post-consultation survey.Results In total, 107 of 353 patients responded to the survey (30%). The response rate increased notably in the older group (p <0.001). The cancer conversion rate overall was 5.4% (19/353), stratified as 2.4% (4/167) for general dental practitioner and 8.1% (15/186) for general medical practitioner (p = 0.02). When asked how worried/concerned they were that the reason for referral might have been for cancer, the response was 'very much' (34%, 33/98), and 'somewhat' (24%, 24/98). Concerns tended to be higher in women and those under 40.Conclusions In recognition of the proportion of patients on the 2WW pathway without cancer who have 'very much worry and concern', it is appropriate to explore ways to alleviate this anxiety, and the best means to achieve this needs careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E P Rowlands
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, (Aintree) Liverpool, UK; Wirral University Teaching Hospital (Arrowe Park), Wirral, UK.
| | - Peter James
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, (Aintree) Liverpool, UK; Wirral University Teaching Hospital (Arrowe Park), Wirral, UK
| | - Derek Lowe
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, (Aintree) Liverpool, UK; Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital (Arrowe Park), Wirral, UK; Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Butterworth CJ, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding "Zygomatic implant perforated (ZIP) flap technique: A milestone in rehabilitation of low-level maxillectomy". Head Neck 2022; 44:2352-2353. [PMID: 35665976 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Butterworth
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.,Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ezeofor V'S, Spencer LH, Rogers SN, Kanatas A, Lowe D, Semple CJ, Hanna JR, Yeo ST, Edwards RT. An Economic Evaluation Supported by Qualitative Data About the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) versus Standard Treatment Pathway in the Management of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Pharmacoecon Open 2022; 6:389-403. [PMID: 35099783 PMCID: PMC8802252 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00320-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The head and neck cancer (HNC) Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) is a condition-specific prompt list that allows patients to raise concerns to cancer consultants that otherwise might be overlooked. OBJECTIVE This is the first economic evaluation of the PCI in patients with HNC investigating the costs and effects to the health service of not prioritising certain treatment pathways in addition to the primary cancer pathway. Additional costs can be accrued due to delayed referral to other appropriate services, e.g. hospital dentist. Economic evidence could influence future policy direction in this area globally. METHODS Alongside a 3-year clustered randomised controlled trial, an economic evaluation was undertaken with Client Service Receipt Inventory data collected at three different time points (baseline and 6 and 12 months post-baseline). Patients were identified by a multidisciplinary team at the trial clinics. This economic analysis compared the PCI intervention versus the non-PCI treatment pathway. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of the PCI versus non-PCI intervention treatment pathways. Qualitative data were also collected from seven consultants to triangulate findings from the economic evaluation. RESULTS The analysis used data from 191 patients (66% of the full trial sample). The PCI inventory was low cost, at just over £13 per participant. The PCI intervention was cost effective and also cost saving, with an incremental cost difference of £295.91 over the 12-month follow-up period. The QALY values were higher in the PCI intervention strategy, with a value of 0.79, whereas the non-PCI group had a value of 0.76, thus the PCI intervention was dominant. The sensitivity analysis showed that, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained, the probability of being cost effective was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.83). Qualitative results showed that consultants using the PCI reported an enhanced awareness of patients' overall post-treatment needs. DISCUSSION The PCI provided an effective means to conduct clinical consultations by avoiding unnecessary healthcare costs and focussing on aspects of care most important to patients. The cost per QALY gain was within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline threshold. The economic evaluation showed that the PCI intervention strategy was dominant and therefore cost saving to the national health service (NHS) and was more effective in terms of treatment. CONCLUSION The PCI appears to be a low-cost intervention that generates a cost-effective benefit to patients from a NHS perspective if rolled out as part of routine care. Qualitative evidence has shown that the use of the PCI is supported by consultants in routine practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT03086629.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victory 'Segun Ezeofor
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK.
| | - Llinos Haf Spencer
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, England
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, England, UK
| | - Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Derek Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, 24 Trinity Place, Congleton, Cheshire, England, CW12 3JB, UK
| | - Cherith J Semple
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Belfast, Northen Ireland, BT37 0QB, UK
- South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT16 1RH, UK
| | - Jeffrey R Hanna
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Seow Tien Yeo
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Willcocks EJ, Lim YBY, Rogers SN. Patients' experience and perceived concerns regarding obtaining and taking prescriptions for head and neck osteoradionecrosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 60:459-464. [PMID: 35351326 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The main components of the medical management of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are combinations of clodronate, pentoxifylline, tocopherol, sometimes with antibiotics or chlorhexidine rinses. Anecdotally in the Cheshire and Merseyside network, patients report having difficulties getting and taking their prescription, hence the aim was to survey patient experience of obtaining prescriptions, administration of the medications, and side effects. Patients prescribed tocopherol and pentoxifylline from the pharmacy department's record database from the period of January 2019 to June 2020 were invited to take part in a semi-structured telephone survey. Sixteen patients out of a total 33 (48%) responded. 11 patients (69%) reported some issue collecting their repeat prescriptions, commonly low stock of medicines in community or unwillingness of GPs to prescribe. One patient permanently stopped treatment owing to difficulties obtaining medication, whilst for three there were temporary gaps in treatment. Difficulty in administration of the medications was reported in 7 patients (44%) patients, most commonly in those with pre-existing dysphagia. Issues related to difficulties in swallowing the large pentoxifylline tablet or with the vitamin E capsules. Patients crushed the medications, but this was associated with gastrointestinal side-effects in one patient who had to stop treatment. One patient stopped chlorhexidine mouthwash due to oral soreness. In conclusion, medical management of ORN is well tolerated by patients. There is difficulty for patients getting prescriptions in primary care. Few patients need to stop taking the medication due to difficulty in administration or side-effects. More patient information would be useful for all concerned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Willcocks
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| | - Yvonne B Y Lim
- Pharmacist Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of this scoping review was to summarise the current evidence for peer-to-peer support and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS Five search engines were used-PubMed, CINAHL, APA PyscInfo, Web of Science and HaNDLE-on-QoL-to look for publications between 1981 and 2020. Adapted PICO (population, intervention, comparator and outcome) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology was used. RESULTS Of the 1408 papers identified, 10 met the inclusion criteria: five qualitative, two cross-sectional, one case-control, one cohort and one quasi-experimental design. There were four common themes: patient experience of peer-to-peer support, delivery of peer-to-peer support, engagement with peer-to-peer support and impact on QoL. CONCLUSION This review highlights the paucity of evidence with regard to QoL and peer-to-peer support in HNC. It provides a summary of the literature and identifies considerations for clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Hatton
- Medical Student, School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool
| | - Julie Crane
- Senior Lecturer, Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, formerly Centre Manager, North West Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Professor and Consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University and Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5989-6142
| | - Jo Patterson
- Professor of Speech and Language Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kanatas A, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Health-related quality of life at 3 months following head and neck cancer treatment is a key predictor of longer-term outcome and of benefit from using the patient concerns inventory. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1879-1890. [PMID: 35178880 PMCID: PMC9041072 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During clinical follow-up it can be difficult to identify those head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who are coping poorly and could benefit from additional support. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires and prompt lists provide a means by which patients can express their perceived outcomes and raise concerns. The first aim of this secondary analysis following a randomized trial was to explore which patient characteristics, at around 3 months following treatment completion (baseline), best predict HRQOL 12 months later. The second aim was to attempt to ascertain which patients were most likely to benefit from using prompt list. METHODS Cluster-controlled pragmatic trial data were analyzed. HRQOL was measured by the University of Washington Quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOLv4). The prompt list was the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI-HN). RESULTS The trial involved 15 eligible consultants and a median (inter-quartile range) of 16 (13-26) primary HNC patients per consultant, with 140 PCI patients and 148 controls. Baseline HRQOL was the dominant predictor of 12-month HRQOL with other predictors related to social, financial, and lifestyle characteristics as well as clinical stage and treatment. Although formal statistical tests for interaction were non-significant the trend in analyses over a range of outcomes suggested that patients with worse baseline HRQOL could benefit more from the PCI-HN. DISCUSSION HRQOL early post-treatment is a key predictor of longer-term outcome. Measuring and using HRQOL and the PCI-HN are not only surrogates for predicting HRQOL at 15 months post-treatment, but also tools to help guide interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Lowe
- Medical Statistician, Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.,Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rogers SN, Adatia A, Hackett S, Boscarino A, Patel A, Lowe D, Butterworth CJ. Changing trends in the microvascular reconstruction and oral rehabilitation following maxillary cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:4113-4126. [PMID: 35106619 PMCID: PMC9249696 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07277-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The maxillectomy defect is complex and the best means to achieve optimal reconstruction, and dental rehabilitation is a source of debate. The refinements in zygomatic implant techniques have altered the means and speed by which rehabilitation can be achieved and has also influenced the choice regarding ideal flap reconstruction. The aim of this study is to report on how the method of reconstruction and oral rehabilitation of the maxilla has changed since 1994 in our Institution, and to reflect on case mix and survival. Methods Consecutive head and neck oncology cases involving maxillary resections over a 27-year period between January 1994 and November 2020 were identified from hospital records and previous studies. Case note review focussed on clinical characteristics, reconstruction, prosthetic rehabilitation, and survival. Results There were 186 patients and the tumour sites were: alveolus for 56% (104), hard palate for 19% (35), maxillary sinus for 18% (34) and nasal for 7% (13). 52% (97) were Brown class 2 defects. Forty-five patients were managed by obturation and 78% (142/183) had free tissue transfer. The main flaps used were radial (52), anterolateral thigh (27), DCIA (22), scapula (13) and fibula (11). There were significant changes over time regarding reconstruction type, use of primary implants, type of dental restoration, and length of hospital stay. Overall survival after 24 months was 64% (SE 4%) and after 60 months was 42% (SE 4%). Conclusion These data reflect a shift in the reconstruction of the maxillary defect afforded by the utilisation of zygomatic implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon N Rogers
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK. .,Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, England.
| | - Ashni Adatia
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephanie Hackett
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK
| | - Angela Boscarino
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anika Patel
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK
| | - Derek Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, England
| | - Christopher J Butterworth
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.,Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mortensen A, Wessel I, Rogers SN, Tolver A, Jarden M. Needs assessment in patients surgically treated for head and neck cancer-a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4201-4218. [PMID: 35083545 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06759-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect and feasibility of a head and neck cancer-specific needs assessment tool integrated into nursing rehabilitation consultations early in the post-surgical period on quality of life, symptom burden, and referrals for multidisciplinary follow-up. METHODS Ninety-two surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. All participants received nursing rehabilitation consultations prior to discharge, and two weeks and two months post-operative. The intervention group had their needs assessed using Patient Concerns Inventory, while standard care used a systematic questioning approach. Primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes were symptom burden and referrals for multidisciplinary rehabilitation follow-up. RESULTS No significant differences were found in quality of life or symptom burden between groups. However, 35% more patients in the intervention group were referred for rehabilitation. The attrition rate was similar in both groups, with a dropout rate of six in each group. No patients declined using the Patient Concerns Inventory. CONCLUSION The intervention showed no improvement in QoL or symptom burden compared to standard care. However, the results suggest that important needs were identified and addressed. Especially emotional and existential needs, which were accommodated through referrals and professional advice. Nursing rehabilitation consultations using the Patient Concerns Inventory are feasible and may ensure that patient preferences and priorities are incorporated in their care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.com (NCT03443258). Date of registration: May 31st, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelise Mortensen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP and Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, Great Britain, UK
| | - Anders Tolver
- Data Science Lab, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Mary Jarden
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University and Department of Hematology, Center for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Daniel M, Rogers SN. Professional delays in referral of patients with mouth cancer: six case histories. Br Dent J 2022; 233:1003-1008. [PMID: 36526764 PMCID: PMC9756702 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-5304-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Professional delay is an important delay in referral of patients with suspected mouth cancer. Missing the possibility of cancer might not only result in worse outcomes in respect to function and survival, but also have medicolegal implications. The aim of this article was to review a consecutive cohort of patients over a two-year period with mouth cancer diagnosis and identify those with professional delay and illustrate the main types of presentations using short case histories. The multi-disciplinary team records were used to identify case notes of a two-year (2019 and 2020) consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed with mouth cancer, including referrals from primary and secondary care. Professional delay was considered if red flag symptoms were not referred within two weeks or if there was initial misdiagnosis. In total, 246 patients with mouth cancer were discussed with the multi-disciplinary team: 35 had delay in referral or misdiagnosis of mouth cancer. Six common scenarios were identified: 1) sudden onset paraesthesia; 2) dental abscess; 3) temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome (TMJD) and abscess; 4) TMJD; 5) trauma/facial fracture; and 6) non-healing socket following dental extraction. To conclude, it can be difficult to accurately diagnose mouth cancer in primary dental and medical care and an index of suspicion is essential in order to minimise the possibility of professional delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Daniel
- Dental Core Trainee, Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- grid.255434.10000 0000 8794 7109Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, UK; Maxillofacial Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Arrowe Park Hospital, Arrowe Park Road, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nazir H, Ying Chieng C, Rogers SN, Nekrasisus R, Dodd M, Shah N. Outcomes of necrotizing fasciitis in the head and neck region in the United Kingdom-a case series and literature review. Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adoms.2022.100254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
24
|
Kanatas A, Coffey D, Spellman J, Twigg J, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Follow-up arrangements in head and neck cancer clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from two tertiary UK head and neck cancer centres. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021. [PMID: 34941427 PMCID: PMC10390241 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this paper is to report the pattern of follow-up that occurred for a cohort of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients across two large centres in the UK (Aintree and Leeds), as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Patients had been treated for HNC with curative intent between April 2017 and October 2019 by 14 oral and maxillofacial (OMFS) and ear nose and throat (ENT) oncology surgeons in the Patient Concerns Inventory intervention trial. In October 2020, hospital records were reviewed, and information collected on the timing and mode (face-to-face/telephone/video) of follow-up consultations. In addition, recurrence, second primary tumours and deaths were recorded. RESULTS At the start of 'lockdown', 212 members of the cohort were known to be alive. During the post-lockdown period (follow-up appointment data comprised 5 months in Aintree and 7 months in Leeds) 7 died and 13 were identified as palliative/recurrence/new primary/metastases ('new event'). In Aintree, the first ENT/OMFS consultations after lockdown were 51 (67%) telephone and 25 (33%) face-to-face appointments. In Leeds, 46 (78%) consultations were by telephone and 13 (22%) were face-to-face. The second ENT/OMFS consultations post lockdown included 11 (44%) telephone and 14 (56%) face-to-face in Aintree, and 21 (75%) telephone and 7 (25%) face-to-face in Leeds. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that clinicians favoured remote consultations. Variations in practice were observed but reached a point of a 'hybrid follow-up approach' that included both face-to-face and remote consultations. With the emergence of telemedicine, clinicians may consider a follow-up model tailored to risk stratification. The development of the mode of such a consultation model needs further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kanatas
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - D Coffey
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - J Spellman
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - J Twigg
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - S N Rogers
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.,Edge Hill University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Highet V, Dukanovic G, Lowies C, Thomas S, Kanatas A. Patient characteristics and refusal to participate in a head and neck cancer intervention trial: experience of two tertiary UK head and neck cancer centres. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021; 104:121-124. [PMID: 34928719 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised clinical trials are an essential component for robust clinical evaluation. They are expensive to deliver but can fail to achieve the required outcomes. This paper reports details of trial recruitment in a head and neck Patient Concerns Inventory intervention trial from two UK head and neck tertiary centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected for a pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultants recruiting patients treated with curative intent after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer (all sites, disease stages, treatments). Ethical approval was given to report on those not recruited by the following characteristics: trial site, trial arm, age, sex, tumour site, overall stage, index of multiple deprivation quintile, timeframe. RESULTS There were 368 patients approached who remained eligible and 80 (22%) declined to participate. Logistic regression suggested that age group (p = 0.008) and index of multiple deprivation quintile group (p = 0.003) were independent predictors of refusal. CONCLUSIONS Although recruitment to the trial was very good, it raised the issue of lower recruitment in the more deprived older group and lower social economic strata. Innovative ways need to be explored to facilitate the 'hard to reach' group contributing to, and benefiting from, clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.,Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire
| | - V Highet
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - G Dukanovic
- Dental Translational Clinical Research Unit, Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, UK
| | - C Lowies
- Liverpool Head and Neck Clinical Trials, Clinical Sciences Building, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - S Thomas
- University of Bristol, University Hospital Bristol and Weston NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - A Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thom L, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Implications of the Quality of Life Metric in head and neck cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 60:810-816. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Butterworth CJ, Lowe D, Rogers SN. The Zygomatic Implant Perforated (ZIP) flap reconstructive technique for the management of low-level maxillary malignancy - clinical & patient related outcomes on 35 consecutively treated patients. Head Neck 2021; 44:345-358. [PMID: 34825746 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The zygomatic implant perforated (ZIP) flap technique provides immediate reconstruction and rapid dental rehabilitation for low-level malignant tumors. METHODS Patients who underwent ZIP flap reconstruction between December 2015 and February 2021 were followed prospectively. RESULTS Thirty-five consecutively treated patients were studied with 16 undergoing surgery alone and 19 undergoing surgery followed by radiotherapy. The median time to fit the prosthesis was 29 days with all patients requiring adjuvant radiotherapy receiving their fixed dental prosthesis prior to its commencement. Vascularized flap (100%), zygomatic implant (98.4%), and prosthesis (97%) survival were excellent and the ZIP flap protocol was highly rated by patient-related outcome measures especially for the chewing domain. CONCLUSIONS The ZIP flap technique provides an excellent means of providing an autogenous oronasal seal and a foundation for immediate cortically anchored fixed dental rehabilitation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This technique provides rapid and robust rehabilitation for patients presenting with low-level maxillary malignancy despite the use of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Butterworth
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.,Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rogers SN, Allmark C, Bekiroglu F, Edwards RT, Fabbroni G, Flavel R, Highet V, Ho MWS, Humphris GM, Jones TM, Khattak O, Lancaster J, Loh C, Lowe D, Lowies C, Macareavy D, Moor J, Ong TK, Prasai A, Roland N, Semple C, Spencer LH, Tandon S, Thomas SJ, Schache A, Shaw RJ, Kanatas A. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: main results of a cluster preference randomised controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:3435-3449. [PMID: 33346856 PMCID: PMC7751263 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06533-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The patient concerns inventory (PCI) is a prompt list allowing head and neck cancer (HNC) patients to discuss issues that otherwise might be overlooked. This trial evaluated the effectiveness of using the PCI at routine outpatient clinics for one year after treatment on health-related QOL (HRQOL). METHODS A pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultants, 8 'using' and 7 'not using' the PCI intervention. Patients treated with curative intent (all sites, disease stages, treatments) were eligible. RESULTS Consultants saw a median (inter-quartile range) 16 (13-26) patients, with 140 PCI and 148 control patients. Of the pre-specified outcomes, the 12-month results for the mean University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOLv4) social-emotional subscale score suggested a small clinical effect of intervention of 4.6 units (95% CI 0.2, 9.0), p = 0.04 after full adjustment for pre-stated case-mix. Results for UW-QOLv4 overall quality of life being less than good at 12 months (primary outcome) also favoured the PCI with a risk ratio of 0.83 (95% CI 0.66, 1.06) and absolute risk 4.8% (- 2.9%, 12.9%) but without achieving statistical significance. Other non-a-priori analyses, including all 12 UWQOL domains and at consultant level also suggested better HRQOL with PCI. Consultation times were unaffected and the number of items selected decreased over time. CONCLUSION This novel trial supports the integration of the PCI approach into routine consultations as a simple low-cost means of benefiting HNC patients. It adds to a growing body of evidence supporting the use of patient prompt lists more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon N. Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Liverpool, L39 4QP UK
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christine Allmark
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Fazilet Bekiroglu
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales UK
| | - Gillon Fabbroni
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Victoria Highet
- Liverpool Head and Neck Clinical Trials, Clinical Sciences Building, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael W. S. Ho
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Gerald M. Humphris
- School of Medicine, Medical & Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
| | - Terry M. Jones
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9GA UK
| | - Owais Khattak
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jeffrey Lancaster
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Loh
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Cher Lowies
- Liverpool Head and Neck Clinical Trials, Clinical Sciences Building, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dominic Macareavy
- Chair of the Head and Neck Patient and Carer Research Forum, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - James Moor
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - T. K. Ong
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - A. Prasai
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicholas Roland
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Cherith Semple
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road, Belfast, Newtownabbey, Co, BT37 0QB Antrim, Belfast UK
- South Eastern Health and Social Care Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, BT16 1RH UK
| | - Llinos Haf Spencer
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Ardudwy Hall, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales UK
| | - Sank Tandon
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Steven J. Thomas
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Bristol University, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Schache
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard J. Shaw
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
James P, Bekiroglu F, Broderick D, Khattak O, Lowe D, Schache A, Shaw RJ, Rogers SN. Immediate postoperative care on high dependency unit or ward following microvascular free tissue transfer: lessons learnt from a change in practice imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 60:343-349. [PMID: 34852938 PMCID: PMC8388193 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in sudden changes to the established practice of using the high dependency unit (HDU) for the first night of postoperative care following microvascular free tissue transfer. Patients were managed instead on the head and neck ward. This retrospective case-note review aimed to report outcomes in consecutive patients treated before and during the pandemic, and to reflect on the implications of ward-based rather than HDU care. A total of 235 patients had free tissue transfer between 3 January 2019 and 25 February 2021: 125 before (lockdown 23 March 2020), and 110 during the pandemic (52 ward-managed and 58 HDU-managed). There were subtle case-mix differences during the pandemic, with 92% of ward-treated patients having oral cancers compared with 64% of HDU patients, and 73% of ward patients having a tracheostomy compared with 40% of HDU patients. Ward patients were less likely to receive electrolyte replacement (45% HDU vs 0% ward) and inotropes (12% HDU vs 2% ward). There were fewer returns to theatre for evacuation of a haematoma or re-anastomosis during the pandemic than there were before it. Other than fewer haematoma complications during the pandemic, the nature of complications was similar. In conclusion, the dramatic changes imposed by the pandemic have shown that the ward is a safe place for patients to be cared for immediately postoperatively, and it alleviates the bed pressures experienced in HDU. Careful case selection and clear criteria are required to identify patients who need the HDU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P James
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - F Bekiroglu
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - D Broderick
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - O Khattak
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK.
| | - A Schache
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - R J Shaw
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK
| | - S N Rogers
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK; Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Walshaw EG, Smith M, Kim D, Wadsley J, Kanatas A, Rogers SN. Systematic review of health-related quality of life following thyroid cancer. Tumori 2021; 108:291-314. [PMID: 34387109 PMCID: PMC9310144 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211025098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This systematic review provides a summary of all studies published between 2000 and 2019 using a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) patient-completed questionnaire to report outcomes following diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer. The search terms were “thyroid cancer” or “thyroid carcinoma,” “quality of life” or “health related quality of life,” and “questionnaire” or “patient reported outcome.” EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and HaNDLE-On-QOL search engines were searched between 2 February and 23 February 2020. A total of 811 identified articles were reduced to 314 when duplicates were removed. After exclusion criteria (not thyroid specific, no quality of life questionnaires, and conference abstracts) were applied, 92 remained. Hand searching identified a further 2 articles. Of the 94 included, 16 had a surgical, 26 a primarily medical, and 52 a general focus. There were articles from 27 countries. A total of 49 articles were published from 2015 through 2019 inclusive. A total of 72 questionnaires were used among the articles and a range of 7 to 2215 participants were included within each article. This review demonstrated an increasing number of publications annually. The scope of enquiry into aspects of HRQOL following thyroid cancer is broad, with relatively few addressing surgical aspects and many focusing on the impact of radio-iodine. More research is required into shared decision-making in initial management decisions and HRQOL and interventions aimed specifically at addressing long-term HRQOL difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mike Smith
- Dental student, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dae Kim
- Consultant ENT and head & neck surgeon, St George's University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Wadsley
- Consultant clinical oncologist, Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anastasios Kanatas
- Oral and maxillofacial surgery consultant, Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Liverpool, UK.,Consultant, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Twigg JA, Anderson JM, Humphris G, Nixon I, Rogers SN, Kanatas A. Re: More evidences are needed in reducing the suicide risk in head and neck cancer patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59:971-972. [PMID: 34304919 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J A Twigg
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and Leeds Dental Institute, United Kingdom.
| | | | - G Humphris
- University of St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
| | - I Nixon
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, United Kingdom; Strathclyde University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - S N Rogers
- University Hospital Aintree, United Kingdom; University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | - A Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom; St James Institute of Oncology, United Kingdom; Leeds Dental Institute, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rogers SN, Monssen C, Humphris GM, Lowe D, Kanatas A. Which Head and Neck Cancer Patients Are Most at Risk of High Levels of Fear of Cancer Recurrence. Front Psychol 2021; 12:671366. [PMID: 34335384 PMCID: PMC8322117 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is recognized as a common concern for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of this study is to describe in greater detail the demographic and clinical characteristics of HCN patients who indicate a high level of FCR in their review consultation. Methods: A pragmatic cluster-controlled trial was conducted between January 2017 and December 2018 at two UK HNC centers (Leeds and Liverpool) to test the efficacy of a prompt tool called the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI). Patients completed the PCI and the UW-QOLv4 which included a single 5 category rating of FCR. Secondary statistical analyses focused on variables associated with high FCR. Results: Two hundred and eighty-eight trial patients were recruited in this trial. At a median of 194 days after diagnosis and 103 days after the end of treatment 8% stated (n = 24) “I get a lot of fears of recurrence and these can really preoccupy my thoughts” and 3% (n = 8) “I am fearful all the time that my cancer might return, and I struggle with this.” Thus, 11% (n = 32) responded in the worst two categories, 95% Confidence interval 7.7–15.3% for high FCR. Stepwise logistic regression resulted in female gender (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.007), and receiving financial benefits (p = 0.01) as independent predictors. Conclusions: Around one in ten HNC patients attending routine outpatient follow-up consultations report high FCR, however for female patients under the age of 55 the rate was one in three. This group requires specialist attention and could be the focus of a multicenter intervention trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.,Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Camilla Monssen
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St. Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Gerald M Humphris
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St. Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd., Congleton, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasios Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St. James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
de Gea Rico A, Muttoni E, V Vassiliou L, Rogers SN, Kyzas P. Post-operative pain management in oral and maxillofacial surgery and the formulation of new electronic prescribing order sets. Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adoms.2021.100119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
34
|
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Midgley AW. Patients' views of physical activity whilst living with and beyond head and neck cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 51:323-331. [PMID: 34083085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Exercise is an important component of recovery following cancer. Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients typically report low levels of engagement in exercise initiatives. The aim of this study was to give insight into HNC patients' reflections on how and why they would be interested in participating in an exercise programme. A stratified sample of 51 patients based on age, gender and initial interest in an exercise programme was selected from 430 postal survey respondents. Twenty-five took part in a semi-structured telephone interview. There was responder bias with females, younger patients, and those already participating in or interested in an exercise programme being over-represented. The responders in this study highlighted issues related to physical activity levels, perceived ability to meet physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors, perceived exercise benefits, perceived exercise barriers, and advice to others diagnosed with cancer. The findings support the premise of personalized interventions tailored towards the specific needs of the patient, supported by patient peers to emphasize the benefits and help motivate patients to take part. In order to promote engagement in exercise there needs to be collaborative, culturally sensitive and individualized approaches, in order to address the specific barriers experienced by HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK
| | - A W Midgley
- Department of Sport & Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mayland CR, Doughty HC, Rogers SN, Gola A, Mason S, Hubbert C, Macareavy D, Jack BA. A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient, Family Carer and Healthcare Professionals' Direct Experiences and Barriers to Providing and Integrating Palliative Care for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. J Palliat Care 2021; 36:121-129. [PMID: 32928058 PMCID: PMC7961626 DOI: 10.1177/0825859720957817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report on direct experiences from advanced head and neck cancer patients, family carers and healthcare professionals, and the barriers to integrating specialist palliative care. METHODS Using a naturalistic, interpretative approach, within Northwest England, a purposive sample of adult head and neck cancer patients was selected. Their family carers were invited to participate. Healthcare professionals (representing head and neck surgery and specialist nursing; oncology; specialist palliative care; general practice and community nursing) were recruited. All participants underwent face-to-face or telephone interviews. A thematic approach, using a modified version of Colazzi's framework, was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Seventeen interviews were conducted (9 patients, 4 joint with family carers and 8 healthcare professionals). Two main barriers were identified by healthcare professionals: "lack of consensus about timing of Specialist Palliative Care engagement" and "high stake decisions with uncertainty about treatment outcome." The main barrier identified by patients and family carers was "lack of preparedness when transitioning from curable to incurable disease." There were 2 overlapping themes from both groups: "uncertainty about meeting psychological needs" and "misconceptions of palliative care." CONCLUSIONS Head and neck cancer has a less predictable disease trajectory, where complex decisions are made and treatment outcomes are less certain. Specific focus is needed to define the optimal way to initiate Specialist Palliative Care referrals which may differ from those used for the wider cancer population. Clearer ways to effectively communicate goals of care are required potentially involving collaboration between Specialist Palliative Care and the wider head and neck cancer team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona Rachel Mayland
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, 7315University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Palliative Care Institute, 4591University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah C Doughty
- Palliative Care Institute, 4591University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, 4591University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, 6249Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
- 89542Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Gola
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, 4919University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute, 4591University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy Hubbert
- 429822Aintree Park General Practice, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic Macareavy
- 89542Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara A Jack
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, 6249Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Silverio SA, Wallace H, Gauntlett W, Berwick R, Mercer S, Morton B, Rogers SN, Sandars JE, Groom P, Brown JM. Becoming the temporary surgeon: A grounded theory examination of anaesthetists performing emergency front of neck access in inter-disciplinary simulation-based training. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249070. [PMID: 33755714 PMCID: PMC7987190 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The time-critical 'can't intubate, can't oxygenate' [CICO] emergency post-induction of anaesthesia is rare, but one which, should it occur, requires Anaesthetists to perform rapid emergency front of neck access [FONA] to the trachea, restoring oxygenation, and preventing death or brain hypoxia. The UK Difficult Airway Society [DAS] has directed all Anaesthetists to be trained with surgical cricothyroidotomy [SCT] as the primary emergency FONA method, sometimes referred to as 'Cric' as a shorthand. We present a longitudinal analysis using a classical approach to Grounded Theory methodology of ten Specialist Trainee Anaesthetists' data during a 6-month training programme delivered jointly by Anaesthetists and Surgeons. We identified with a critical realist ontology and an objectivist epistemology meaning data interpretation was driven by participants' narratives and accepted as true accounts of their experience. Our theory comprises three themes: 'Identity as an Anaesthetist'; 'The Role of a Temporary Surgeon'; and 'Training to Reconcile Identities', whereby training facilitated the psychological transition from a 'bloodless Doctor' (Anaesthetist) to becoming a 'temporary Surgeon'. The training programme enabled Specialist Trainees to move between the role of control and responsibility (Identity as an Anaesthetist), through self-described 'failure' and into a role of uncertainty about one's own confidence and competence (The Role of a Temporary Surgeon), and then return to the Anaesthetist's role once the airway had been established. Understanding the complexity of an intervention and providing a better insight into the training needs of Anaesthetic trainees, via a Grounded Theory approach, allows us to evaluate training programmes against the recognised technical and non-technical needs of those being trained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio A. Silverio
- Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Hilary Wallace
- Anaesthesia and Theatres Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - William Gauntlett
- The Jackson Rees Department of Anaesthesia, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Berwick
- Anaesthesia and Theatres Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Pain Research Institute, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Mercer
- Anaesthesia and Theatres Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Medical Education Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Morton
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Critical Care Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health & Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - John E. Sandars
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health & Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Groom
- Anaesthesia and Theatres Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy M. Brown
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health & Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chieng CY, Davies A, Aziz A, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Health related quality of life and patient concerns in patients with osteoradionecrosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59:1061-1066. [PMID: 34325946 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The number of patients presenting with osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is likely to increase in future and health related quality of life (HRQOL) is a key outcome. This study aimed to report patient concerns and HRQOL in an osteoradionecrosis cohort over 12 years. Patients attended routine follow-up clinics between 2008 to 2020, where patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment was used before consultations as standard practice. The two PROs were the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) and the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL v4). The study sample comprised 109 patients with ORN seen in 445 clinics when PCI and UW-QOL were used. At clinic, patients were in one of six ORN states: before ORN (26 with data), at diagnosis (12), and following treatment either improved (27), progressed (46), stable (63) or resolved (37). Worst HRQOL outcomes were reported in the progressive group with 50% reporting overall QOL as less than good. Pain was a major dysfunction (63%) as was physical and social-emotional functioning and this group reported many PCI issues, median (IQR) 7 (4-11). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival with 95% CI after diagnosis with ORN were 96% (90-99%) at 12 months, 89% (81-94%) at 24 months and 73% (61-82%) at 60 months. This study indicates that ORN is a chronic condition with long-term survivorship consequences. More data through cohort studies and trials are needed to assist in decision making for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Y Chieng
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Davies
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Aziz
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK.
| | - S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, UK; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Allen S, Rogers SN, Brown S, Harris RV. What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor-patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics? Health Expect 2021; 24:140-151. [PMID: 33227177 PMCID: PMC7879543 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore socioeconomic status (SES) differences in patterns of doctor-patient communication within head and neck cancer clinics and why such differences exist. METHODS Thirty-six head and neck cancer review appointments with five Physicians were observed and audio-taped, along with follow-up interviews involving 32 patients. Data were analysed using Thematic Analysis, and compared by patient SES (education, occupation and Indices of Multiple Deprivation). RESULTS Three main themes were identified: (a) Physicians used more humour and small talk in their consultations with high SES patients; (b) Low SES patients were more passive in their participation, engaged in less agenda setting and information-seeking, and framed their clinical experience differently; (c) Low SES patients had different preferences for involvement, defining involvement differently to high SES patients and were seen to take a more stoical approach. CONCLUSION Low SES patients take a more passive role in medical consultations, engage in less relational talk and are less likely to raise concerns, but were satisfied with this. Physicians may adapt their communication behaviour in response to low SES patients' expectations and preferences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A question prompt list may help low SES patients to raise concerns during their consultations. This may reduce inequalities in communication and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Allen
- Department of Health Services ResearchInstitute of Population Health SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Simon N. Rogers
- Evidence‐Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC)Faculty of Health and Social CareEdge Hill UniversityOrmskirkUK
- Consultant Regional Maxillofacial UnitUniversity Hospital AintreeLiverpoolUK
| | - Steven Brown
- Department of Psychological SciencesInstitute of Population Health SciencesLiverpoolUK
| | - Rebecca V. Harris
- Department of Health Services ResearchInstitute of Population Health SciencesLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sato T, Rogers SN. Modification of a face shield to allow point-of-view (POV) assisted training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59:238-239. [PMID: 33353769 PMCID: PMC7434382 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Sato
- Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL.
| | - S N Rogers
- Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mayland CR, Ho QM, Doughty HC, Rogers SN, Peddinti P, Chada P, Mason S, Cooper M, Dey P. The palliative care needs and experiences of people with advanced head and neck cancer: A scoping review. Palliat Med 2021; 35:27-44. [PMID: 33084497 PMCID: PMC7797618 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320963892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The palliative care needs of people with advanced head and neck cancer pose unique complexities due to the impact the illness has on eating, speaking, appearance and breathing. Examining these needs would help provide guidance about developing relevant models of care and identify gaps in research knowledge. AIM To identify and map out the palliative care needs and experiences for people with advanced head and neck cancer. DESIGN A scoping literature review following the methods described by the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SOURCES An electronic search of the literature was undertaken in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE and CINAHL covering the years January 1996 to January 2019. RESULTS People with advanced head and neck cancer often had palliative care needs but there was variability in the timing and access to relevant services. A high prevalence of interventions, for example hospital admissions were needed even during the last month of life. This was not necessarily negated with early engagement of palliative care. Dissonance between patients and family carers about information needs and decision-making was an additional complexity. Studies tended to be descriptive in nature, and often involved a single centre. CONCLUSION This scoping review demonstrates the complexity of care for people with advanced head and neck cancer and the issues related to the current healthcare systems. Focus on appropriate referral criteria, increased integration and coordination of care and robust evaluation of specific care components seems key. Linkage between research and service design delivery across teams, disciplines and care settings seems pertinent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona R Mayland
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Qiaoling Marilyn Ho
- Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Nanyang Technology University, Singapore
| | - Hannah C Doughty
- Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
- Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Prithvi Peddinti
- University of Liverpool Medical School, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Praytush Chada
- University of Liverpool Medical School, Liverpool, UK
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Paola Dey
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rogers SN, Dailey Y, Langton S. Re: re: Two-week rule: suspected head and neck cancer referrals from a general medical practice perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:612-613. [PMID: 33865646 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Y Dailey
- 1829 Building, Countess of Chester Health Park, Chester, CH2 1HU, UK.
| | - S Langton
- 2 Ravensdale Road, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL1 5DN.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chieng CY, Davies A, Lowe D, Bekiroglu F, Khattak O, Schache A, Shaw R, Rogers SN. Clinical characteristics, treatment intent, and outcome in a consecutive 10-year cohort of oral cancer patients aged 75 years and older. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:303-311. [PMID: 33261937 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the elderly is expected to increase by nearly a third in the next decade. Its management in older patients is potentially more challenging due to their pre-existing medical comorbidities, frailty, reduced life expectancy, and social issues. The aim of this retrospective review was to report on treatment given to patients aged 75 years and over, case mix, and survival. All patients aged 75 years and over who were diagnosed with OSCC in Merseyside between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, and treated with either curative or palliative intent, were included. Their hospital notes were reviewed. Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for data analysis. There were 236 patients (median (IQR) age 81 (78-86) years); 67% were treated curatively and 33% palliatively. Factors associated with palliation included older age, advanced tumour stage, cognitive impairment, and residence in a nursing or residential home. Of the 165 patients who were offered curative treatment, six (4%) declined due to personal or family reasons. Overall survival for palliative patients was 12% at one year and 7% at two years, whereas for patients treated curatively it was 74% at one year, 56% at two years, and 34% at five years. Patients over 85 years of age were less likely to have composite free flaps and postoperative radiotherapy. Perioperative mortality was 2.6%. Improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have enabled clinicians to offer treatment with curative intent to older frail patients, and with careful case selection outcomes can be very good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Y Chieng
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Davies
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire.
| | - F Bekiroglu
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - O Khattak
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Schache
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - R Shaw
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK.
| | - S N Rogers
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK; Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
O'Connell JE, Brown JS, Rogers SN, Bekiroglu F, Schache A, Shaw RJ. Outcomes of microvascular composite reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:1031-1035. [PMID: 34531074 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes and reconstruction-related complications in patients receiving a composite free flap reconstruction of the mandible for ORN with those reconstructed for other indications. The records of all patients who underwent composite reconstruction of a mandibular defect at Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, were reviewed and analysed. Based on radiotherapy exposure and ORN history, the study cohort was divided into three separate case-matched groups. Local wound healing issues were markedly more common in the ORN setting, as was infection and subsequent osteosynthesis plate(s) removal. Free flap survival was similar among all three case-matched groups. Advanced mandibular ORN may be safely and predictably reconstructed with composite free flaps, and that while the rate of local complications is greater than non-irradiated, and non-ORN case-matched controls, the free flap survival rate compares favourably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E O'Connell
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL.
| | - J S Brown
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL
| | - S N Rogers
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL; Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - F Bekiroglu
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL
| | - A Schache
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL; Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, 200 London Road Liverpool L3 9TA
| | - R J Shaw
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL; Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, 200 London Road Liverpool L3 9TA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rogers SN, Semple CJ, Humphris GM, Lowe D, Kanatas A. Using the Patient Concerns Inventory in the identification of fatigue following treatment for head and neck cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 50:865-872. [PMID: 33250271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Fatigue has a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and HRQOL of head and neck cancer patients who raised the issue of fatigue on the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) at their review consultation. Eight consultants were randomized to use the PCI as part of a cluster-controlled trial. Patients also completed the University of Washington Quality of Life version 4 (UWQOL), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol Group), and Distress Thermometer questionnaires. The study included 140 patients who attended clinics at a median of 108 (interquartile range 70-165) days after the end of treatment. The PCI item 'fatigue' was the sixth most commonly selected, by 29% (n=40). Those with advanced tumours were more likely to have selected the item (30/84, 36% vs 10/56, 18%; P=0.02), as were those treated with radiotherapy±chemotherapy (34/87, 39% vs 6/53, 11%; P<0.001). The PCI fatigue group reported significantly worse overall quality of life, social-emotional and physical function composite scores (UWQOL), Distress Thermometer, and EQ-5D-5L. PCI fatigue was common in those with sleeping, nausea, mood, depression, mobility, breathing, and energy level concerns. In conclusion, given the problems associated with fatigue, it is appropriate to screen and seek interventions that might help patients address this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| | - C J Semple
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, UK; South Eastern Health and Social Care, Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, UK.
| | - G M Humphris
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK.
| | - A Kanatas
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals and St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Dental Institute and Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
McLean A, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Administration of intravenous iron and tranexamic acid in the management of postoperative iron deficiency anaemia following free flap reconstruction: re-audit. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:97-101. [PMID: 33168366 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Following free tissue transfer, intravenous iron (IVI) has a role in reducing the rates of blood transfusion and more rapidly restoring haemoglobin (Hb) levels. Anaemia has a detrimental effect on survival, postoperative complications, fatigue, and health-related quality of life, therefore early correction is recommended. The aim of this re-audit is to assess the use of IVI, of tranexamic acid intraoperatively, and of perioperative blood transfusions. A total of 148 consecutive patients who underwent ablative surgery and free flap reconstruction between May 2018 and September 2019 were audited. The median (IQR) age was 66 (59,72) years and 36% were female. For two-thirds, surgery was for cancer located in the oral cavity and two-thirds of the free flaps were soft tissue. Tranexamic acid (TXA) was used intraoperatively for 30%, red blood cells (RBC) were transfused for 20% and 55 patients (37%) received IV iron. This compares with 4%, 26%, and 0, respectively, in the initial audit. Those having IVI were more likely (56%) to have had a composite flap, a lower postoperative haemoglobin and lower discharge Hb. The Hb between four and twelve weeks' follow up, known for 40, was a median (IQR) of 122 (104,138). There were no adverse reactions to IV iron. Although it is straightforward to administer IVI postoperatively, this re-audit demonstrates that it can be a challenge to embed change in protocols. Through raised awareness of the benefits of IVI, lack of adverse events and clarification of selection criteria, it is hoped that rates of IVI use will increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A McLean
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd., Congleton, Cheshire.
| | - S N Rogers
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rogers SN, Al-Nakisbandi H, Dahill A, Lowe D. Head and neck cancer patients' recollection of their clinical characteristics. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:86-90. [PMID: 33071048 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are an important component of treatment evaluation. Typically they are completed by patients on paper, but through advances in technology such as mobile phone apps and websites, there is a great opportunity for electronic completion. It can be challenging, particularly at a regional or national level, to maintain accurate core clinical records on head and neck cancer (HNC) (baseline, recurrence, second primary, and further treatment), and these will influence PROs and the reporting of outcomes. In addition, with data security and confidentiality there is merit in undertaking anonymous surveys, but in this approach, there is a reliance on patients' recall. The aim of this study therefore was to compare updated hospital records with details completed by patients. In January 2019, 395 HNC patients who had been treated in 2015 and 2016 were sent a survey. They were asked to recall the clinical variables of gender, age at diagnosis, tumour site, tumour stage, and primary treatment, and these were analysed for agreement with the hospital records. The kappa statistic (KP) was used to measure the strength of agreement for categorical variables. There were 146 responders and one patient correctly stated that they did not have cancer. Five indicated further disease rather than primary cancer. Agreement between the hospital record and patients' recall was excellent for gender (KP=0.97) and age group (KP=0.92), very good for treatment (KP=0.79), and good for site of cancer (KP=0.61), but poor for stage of cancer (KP=0.18). In general, patients gave accurate accounts of these details apart from tumour stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| | - H Al-Nakisbandi
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Dahill
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Littlewood CG, Jebril A, Lowe D, Konig R, Groom P, Rogers SN. Factors contributing to delayed decannulation of temporary tracheostomies following free tissue reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:472-477. [PMID: 33485712 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Temporary tracheostomies (TT) are performed to secure the airway perioperatively and postoperatively in head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumour resection and free tissue reconstructive surgery. Patients report that having a TT is unpleasant and they appreciate its removal at the earliest opportunity. Early removal not only improves patient satisfaction but should allow for a more rapid recovery. The aim of this prospective study was to assess factors that contribute to delays in decannulation following TT and hence to provide an insight into the factors that will support earlier decannulation when it is safe to do so. Consecutive patients who had TT over a six-month period were included. Delayed decannulation was defined as that after day seven postoperatively. There were 42 patients with a median (IQR) age of 70 (60-74) years, 26 of whom were men. The tracheostomy was surgical in 29 and percutaneous in 13. The median (IQR) time to decannulation was 4 (3-5) days (range 1-11 days). Seven patients had delayed removal (7-11 days), the reasons being hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (n=4), prolonged stay in the high dependency unit (HDU) following postoperative myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest (n=1), failure to tolerate TT occlusion (n=1), and not stated (n=1). There were early postoperative complications in 14 patients but despite this seven decannulations were still performed within two and six days. Additional multiprofessional assessment over weekends is likely to facilitate earlier decannulation. As some TTs are removed after a few days there is a need for better selection to avoid their use in certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C G Littlewood
- Department of Medical Education, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, L9 1AE, UK.
| | - A Jebril
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, L9 1AE, UK.
| | - D Lowe
- Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, L39 4QP.
| | - R Konig
- Anaesthesia and Theatres Department, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - P Groom
- Anaesthesia and Theatres Department, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - S N Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Forrester S, Fisher G, Chieng CY, Rogers SN. Oral and maxillofacial dental care professionals in critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 59:117-120. [PMID: 33218695 PMCID: PMC7446613 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic there was a ‘call to arms’ across the oral and maxillofacial staff. This article reports on the extended role of the department's dental care professionals (DCPs) and the tremendous opportunity and value that temporary redeployment presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Forrester
- Dental Nurse, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Orthodontics Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK.
| | - G Fisher
- Dental Hygienist, DipDHE, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Orthodontics Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK.
| | - C Y Chieng
- Dental Core Trainee, BDS, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK.
| | - S N Rogers
- Consultant in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, FRCS (OMFS) MD, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP and Liverpool Head and Neck Cancer Centre, Liverpool University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bajwa MS, Houghton D, Java K, Triantafyllou A, Khattak O, Bekiroglu F, Schache AG, Brown JS, McCaul JA, Rogers SN, Lowe D, McMahon J, Shaw RJ. The relevance of surgical margins in clinically early oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2020; 110:104913. [PMID: 32711167 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is controversy regarding surgical margins in the management of early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The main objectives of this study were to assess the: relevance of the margin independent of tumour variables; threshold for a safe margin; relevance of dysplasia at the margin. MATERIALS & METHODS UK based retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with previously untreated and clinically early OSCC between 1998 and 2016. All patients had surgery as the primary modality and had surgical staging of the neck. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Margins were classified as: clear ≥5.0 mm; close 1.0-4.9 mm; involved not cut-through (INC-T) 0.1-0.9 mm; cut-through (C-T) 0 mm. RESULTS 669 patients were included. After adjusting for tumour variables Cox multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that close margins had similar survival outcomes to clear margins (Hazard Ratio(HR) 0.99 (95%CI 0.50-1.95) for Local Recurrence Free Survival (LRFS); HR 1.08 (95%CI 0.7-1.66) for Disease Free Survival (DFS); HR 0.74 (95%CI 0.44-1.25) for Disease Specific Survival (DSS); HR 0.80 (95%CI 0.58-1.11) for Overall Survival (OS)). C-T margins had significantly worse LRFS (HR 5.01 (95%CI 2.02-12.39)) and DFS (HR 2.58 (95%CI 1.28-5.20)). INC-T margins had significantly worse DFS (HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.01-3.87)). Time dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis did not demonstrate a clear margin threshold for LRFS within 24 months (AUC = 0.53 (95%CI 0.41-0.64)). Dysplasia at the margin did not influence LRFS or DFS. CONCLUSION Only resection margins <1 mm independently affected survival outcomes. This should be considered when making decisions regarding adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep S Bajwa
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - David Houghton
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Kapil Java
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Asterios Triantafyllou
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Owais Khattak
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fazilet Bekiroglu
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Andrew G Schache
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - James S Brown
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - James A McCaul
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
| | - Derek Lowe
- Astraglobe Ltd, Congleton, Cheshire, UK.
| | - Jeremy McMahon
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Richard J Shaw
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Talwar C, McClune A, Kelly D, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Two-week rule: suspected head and neck cancer referrals from a general medical practice perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 58:981-985. [PMID: 32682652 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The two-week rule (2WR) referral system was designed to fast-track patients with suspected malignancies to secondary care services to facilitate prompt investigation and management, the ultimate goals being early detection and improved survival. Patients with symptoms of head and neck cancer primarily present to the general practitioner (GP) who has an important role in the identification of high-risk patients for prompt management. This paper reports urgent 2WR referrals from primary care to highlight difficulties in the referral process. Data were collected from three GP practices (16 GPs) in Merseyside that all used the EMIS Web system (EMIS Health). All patients who were referred on the 2WR pathway in a two-year period from January 2017 were identified (n=113). The conversion rate for malignant diagnosis was 5.5% (95% CI: 2.0 to 11.5%). Those with multiple symptoms had a higher rate of malignancy (16%, 3/19) than those with a single symptom (3%, 3/91) (p=0.06). In total, 76% of patients had had no treatment before referral. The duration of symptoms ranged from 1 - 208 weeks (median (IQR) 6 (4-12) weeks). Common benign symptoms included laryngopharyngeal reflux (n=27), thyroid lesion (n=9), and neck lymph node (n=7). The diagnosis of head and neck cancer in primary care is challenging. Initiatives to try to increase the cancer conversion rate are required, but they run the risk of missed diagnosis and increased delay. Sufficient resources are needed in secondary care to ensure the timely assessment of patients who are referred on the 2WR pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Talwar
- Southport and Ormskirk NHS Foundation Trust, Town Lane, Kew, Southport, PR8 6PN.
| | - A McClune
- Southport and Ormskirk NHS Foundation Trust, Town Lane, Kew, Southport, PR8 6PN.
| | - D Kelly
- Southport and Ormskirk NHS Foundation Trust, Town Lane, Kew, Southport, PR8 6PN.
| | - D Lowe
- Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, L39 4QP.
| | - S N Rogers
- Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, L39 4QP; University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, L9 1AE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|