1
|
Ruëff F, Bauer A, Becker S, Brehler R, Brockow K, Chaker AM, Darsow U, Fischer J, Fuchs T, Gerstlauer M, Gernert S, Hamelmann E, Hötzenecker W, Klimek L, Lange L, Merk H, Mülleneisen NK, Neustädter I, Pfützner W, Sieber W, Sitter H, Skudlik C, Treudler R, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Jakob T. Diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy: S2k Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Berufs- und Umweltdermatologie e.V. (ABD), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), German Respiratory Society (DGP), and the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI). Allergol Select 2023; 7:154-190. [PMID: 37854067 PMCID: PMC10580978 DOI: 10.5414/alx02430e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Hymenoptera venom (HV) is injected into the skin during a sting by Hymenoptera such as bees or wasps. Some components of HV are potential allergens and can cause large local and/or systemic allergic reactions (SAR) in sensitized individuals. During their lifetime, ~ 3% of the general population will develop SAR following a Hymenoptera sting. This guideline presents the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to SAR following Hymenoptera stings. Symptomatic therapy is usually required after a severe local reaction, but specific diagnosis or allergen immunotherapy (AIT) with HV (VIT) is not necessary. When taking a patient's medical history after SAR, clinicians should discuss possible risk factors for more frequent stings and more severe anaphylactic reactions. The most important risk factors for more severe SAR are mast cell disease and, especially in children, uncontrolled asthma. Therefore, if the SAR extends beyond the skin (according to the Ring and Messmer classification: grade > I), the baseline serum tryptase concentration shall be measured and the skin shall be examined for possible mastocytosis. The medical history should also include questions specific to asthma symptoms. To demonstrate sensitization to HV, allergists shall determine concentrations of specific IgE antibodies (sIgE) to bee and/or vespid venoms, their constituents and other venoms as appropriate. If the results are negative less than 2 weeks after the sting, the tests shall be repeated (at least 4 - 6 weeks after the sting). If only sIgE to the total venom extracts have been determined, if there is double sensitization, or if the results are implausible, allergists shall determine sIgE to the different venom components. Skin testing may be omitted if in-vitro methods have provided a definitive diagnosis. If neither laboratory diagnosis nor skin testing has led to conclusive results, additional cellular testing can be performed. Therapy for HV allergy includes prophylaxis of reexposure, patient self treatment measures (including use of rescue medication) in the event of re-stings, and VIT. Following a grade I SAR and in the absence of other risk factors for repeated sting exposure or more severe anaphylaxis, it is not necessary to prescribe an adrenaline auto-injector (AAI) or to administer VIT. Under certain conditions, VIT can be administered even in the presence of previous grade I anaphylaxis, e.g., if there are additional risk factors or if quality of life would be reduced without VIT. Physicians should be aware of the contraindications to VIT, although they can be overridden in justified individual cases after weighing benefits and risks. The use of β-blockers and ACE inhibitors is not a contraindication to VIT. Patients should be informed about possible interactions. For VIT, the venom extract shall be used that, according to the patient's history and the results of the allergy diagnostics, was the trigger of the disease. If, in the case of double sensitization and an unclear history regarding the trigger, it is not possible to determine the culprit venom even with additional diagnostic procedures, VIT shall be performed with both venom extracts. The standard maintenance dose of VIT is 100 µg HV. In adult patients with bee venom allergy and an increased risk of sting exposure or particularly severe anaphylaxis, a maintenance dose of 200 µg can be considered from the start of VIT. Administration of a non-sedating H1-blocking antihistamine can be considered to reduce side effects. The maintenance dose should be given at 4-weekly intervals during the first year and, following the manufacturer's instructions, every 5 - 6 weeks from the second year, depending on the preparation used; if a depot preparation is used, the interval can be extended to 8 weeks from the third year onwards. If significant recurrent systemic reactions occur during VIT, clinicians shall identify and as possible eliminate co-factors that promote these reactions. If this is not possible or if there are no such co-factors, if prophylactic administration of an H1-blocking antihistamine is not effective, and if a higher dose of VIT has not led to tolerability of VIT, physicians should should consider additional treatment with an anti IgE antibody such as omalizumab as off lable use. For practical reasons, only a small number of patients are able to undergo sting challenge tests to check the success of the therapy, which requires in-hospital monitoring and emergency standby. To perform such a provocation test, patients must have tolerated VIT at the planned maintenance dose. In the event of treatment failure while on treatment with an ACE inhibitor, physicians should consider discontinuing the ACE inhibitor. In the absence of tolerance induction, physicians shall increase the maintenance dose (200 µg to a maximum of 400 µg in adults, maximum of 200 µg HV in children). If increasing the maintenance dose does not provide adequate protection and there are risk factors for a severe anaphylactic reaction, physicians should consider a co-medication based on an anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab; off-label use) during the insect flight season. In patients without specific risk factors, VIT can be discontinued after 3 - 5 years if maintenance therapy has been tolerated without recurrent anaphylactic events. Prolonged or permanent VIT can be considered in patients with mastocytosis, a history of cardiovascular or respiratory arrest due to Hymenoptera sting (severity grade IV), or other specific constellations associated with an increased individual risk of recurrent and/or severe SAR (e.g., hereditary α-tryptasemia). In cases of strongly increased, unavoidable insect exposure, adults may receive VIT until the end of intense contact. The prescription of an AAI can be omitted in patients with a history of SAR grade I and II when the maintenance dose of VIT has been reached and tolerated, provided that there are no additional risk factors. The same holds true once the VIT has been terminated after the regular treatment period. Patients with a history of SAR grade ≥ III reaction, or grade II reaction combined with additional factors that increase the risk of non response or repeated severe sting reactions, should carry an emergency kit, including an AAI, during VIT and after regular termination of the VIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, Munich
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden
| | - Sven Becker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen
| | - Randolf Brehler
- Department of Dermatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - Adam M. Chaker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - Ulf Darsow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - Jörg Fischer
- University Hospital for Dermatology and Allergology, Clinic Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Thomas Fuchs
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen
| | - Michael Gerstlauer
- Clinic for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg
| | | | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Children’s Center Bethel, University Hospital OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Wolfram Hötzenecker
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Medical Faculty of University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Lars Lange
- Pediatric Clinic, Marienhospital Bonn, GFO Kliniken, Bonn
| | - Hans Merk
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen
| | | | | | - Wolfgang Pfützner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg
| | | | - Helmut Sitter
- Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg
| | - Christoph Skudlik
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, and BG Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg
| | | | - Bettina Wedi
- Comprehensive Allergy, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Stefan Wöhrl
- Floridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Vienna, Austria
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, and
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gernert S, Wiesenäcker D. 7/m nach Insektenstich. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-023-01732-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
3
|
Dobbertin-Welsch J, Staudacher O, Yürek S, Trendelenburg V, Tschirner S, Ziegert M, Ahrens F, Millner-Uhlemann M, Büsing S, Striegel A, Ott H, Arens A, Gappa M, Lange L, Gernert S, Niggemann B, Beyer K. Organ-specific symptom patterns during oral food challenge in children with peanut and tree nut allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13778. [PMID: 35616889 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut and tree nut allergies are common in childhood and often severe in nature. The clinical picture shows a wide variety of symptoms. OBJECTIVE To analyze the distribution of clinical symptoms and severity during oral food challenges (OFC) in children. METHODS Analysis of 1.013 prospectively recorded, positive OFCs with peanut (n = 607), hazelnut (n = 266), walnut (n = 97), and cashew (n = 43). Symptoms were categorized as immediate-type skin, gastrointestinal, upper and lower respiratory, cardiovascular symptoms, and eczema exacerbation. Symptom severity and treatment were recorded. RESULTS Skin symptoms presented in 78%, followed by gastrointestinal (47%), upper (42%), and lower respiratory symptoms (32%). Cardiovascular symptoms presented in 6%. In three-quarter of the reactions, more than one organ was involved. Importantly, severe reactions occurred at every dose level. Peanut- and cashew-allergic patients had a higher relative risk of gastrointestinal symptoms compared with hazelnut- and walnut-allergic patients. Patients without vomiting had a 1.7 times higher risk developing immediate-type skin and/or lower respiratory symptoms. Three-quarter of the patients ever had eczema but worsening presented in only 10.5% of the OFCs. In patients with multiple food allergies, organs involved, eliciting dose and severity differed between allergens. CONCLUSION Although comparisons between allergen groups with different clinical history, severity, comorbidities and laboratory data are difficult and might contain bias, our data confirm the high allergenic potential of peanut and tree nuts. The rare occurrence of eczema worsening emphasizes that avoidance diets of peanuts and tree nuts to cure eczema seem to be unnecessary and may hamper tolerance maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Dobbertin-Welsch
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Olga Staudacher
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Immunology, Labor Berlin - Charité Vivantes GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Songül Yürek
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Valérie Trendelenburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Tschirner
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mandy Ziegert
- Department of Pediatric Allergology, German Red Cross Clinic Westend, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Anne Striegel
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alisa Arens
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | - Monica Gappa
- Children's Hospital, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Formerly Marien hospital Wesel, Wesel, Germany
| | - Lars Lange
- Department for Pediatrics, St. Marien-Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sunhild Gernert
- Department for Pediatrics, St. Marien-Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | - Bodo Niggemann
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Allergology, German Red Cross Clinic Westend, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lange L, Gernert S, Berger M, Arens A, Rache L, Delissen J, Yavuz ST, Millner-Uhlemann M, Wiesenäcker D, Neustädter I, Reese I, Utz P, Schuster A, Adelsberger D, Ziegert M, Kerzel S, Finger A. Different Patterns of Foods Triggering FPIES in Germany. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2022; 10:1063-1069. [PMID: 34942384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergy mainly affecting infants and young children. Allergic FPIES reactions differ from IgE-mediated food allergies, for example, regarding elicitors and clinical course. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to describe causative agents and development of tolerance in German children with FPIES. METHODS We conducted a retrospective survey on children with FPIES from 14 centers in Germany assessing a 6-year period. RESULTS We analyzed 142 patients with 190 FPIES reactions, 130 of which met acute FPIES criteria and 60 were defined as chronic FPIES. The most frequent eliciting food for acute FPIES was cow's milk, followed by fish, vegetables (eg, potato, pumpkin), meats (eg, beef), and grains. A total of 119 children reacted to 1 food only, 16 children to 2 or 3 foods, and 7 children to ≥4 foods. In chronic FPIES, all but 4 exclusively breastfed infants reacted to cow's milk feeding. IgE sensitization to the triggering food was found in 21 of 152 (14%) cases. Two children developed additional IgE-mediated symptoms upon a food challenge. Time to proof of tolerance was shortest in cow's milk-induced FPIES, and it was shorter in chronic than in acute FPIES. CONCLUSION In our national survey, we identified triggers for acute FPIES that partially differ from those reported internationally. Mainly foods introduced early in infant nutrition triggered acute reactions. Time to proven tolerance was shown to be contingent on FPIES symptomatology and on the triggering food. These data should be considered regarding nutritional advice for infants with FPIES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Lange
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Marien-Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Sunhild Gernert
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Marien-Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | - Moritz Berger
- Department of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alisa Arens
- Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Julia Delissen
- Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital Amsterdamer Straße, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Tolga Yavuz
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, Childen's Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - David Wiesenäcker
- Department of Pediatrics, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Irena Neustädter
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Intensive Care, Cnopfsche Kinderklinik, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Imke Reese
- Dietary Counseling and Nutrition Therapy Centre, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Utz
- Children's University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Antje Schuster
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Deborah Adelsberger
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Medical Campus of University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Mandy Ziegert
- Department of Pediatric Allergology, German Red Cross Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kerzel
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergy, University Children's Hospital Regensburg, St. Hedwig Campus, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antje Finger
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Marien-Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maris I, Dölle‐Bierke S, Renaudin J, Lange L, Koehli A, Spindler T, Hourihane J, Scherer K, Nemat K, Kemen C, Neustädter I, Vogelberg C, Reese T, Yildiz I, Szepfalusi Z, Ott H, Straube H, Papadopoulos NG, Hämmerling S, Staden U, Polz M, Mustakov T, Cichocka‐Jarosz E, Cocco R, Fiocchi AG, Fernandez‐Rivas M, Worm M, Grünhagen J, Wittenberg M, Beyer K, Henschel A, Küper S, Möser A, Fuchs T, Ruëff F, Wedi B, Hansen G, Buck T, Büsselberg J, Drägerdt R, Pfeffer L, Dickel H, Körner‐Rettberg C, Merk H, Lehmann S, Bauer A, Nordwig A, Zeil S, Hannapp C, Wagner N, Rietschel E, Hunzelmann N, Huseynow I, Treudler R, Aurich S, Prenzel F, Klimek L, Pfaar O, Reider N, Aberer W, Varga E, Bogatu B, Schmid‐Grendelmeier P, Guggenheim R, Riffelmann F, Kreft B, Kinaciyan K, Hartl L, Ebner C, Horak F, Brehler R, Witte J, Buss M, Hompes S, Bieber T, Gernert S, Bücheler M, Rabe U, Brosi W, Nestoris S, Hawranek T, Lang R, Bruns R, Pföhler C, Eng P, Schweitzer‐Krantz S, Meller S, Rebmann H, Fischer J, Stichtenoth G, Thies S, Gerstlauer M, Utz P, Neustädter I, Klinge J, Volkmuth S, Plank‐Habibi S, Schilling B, Kleinheinz A, Brückner A, Schäkel K, Manolaraki I, Kowalski M, Solarewicz‐Madajek K, Tscheiller S, Seidenberg J, Cardona V, Garcia B, Bilo M, Cabañes Higuero N, Vega Castro A, Poziomkowska‐Gęsicka I, Büsing S, Virchow C, Christoff G, Jappe U, Müller S, Knöpfel F, Correard A, Rogala B, Montoro A, Brandes A, Muraro A, Zimmermann N, Hernandez D, Minale P, Niederwimmer J, Zahel B, Dahdah L, Arasi S, Reissig A, Eitelberger F, Asero R, Hermann F, Zeidler S, Pistauer S, Geißler M, Ensina L, Plaza Martin A, Meister J, Stieglitz S, Hamelmann E. Peanut-induced anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry. Allergy 2021; 76:1517-1527. [PMID: 33274436 DOI: 10.1111/all.14683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy has a rising prevalence in high-income countries, affecting 0.5%-1.4% of children. This study aimed to better understand peanut anaphylaxis in comparison to anaphylaxis to other food triggers in European children and adolescents. METHODS Data was sourced from the European Anaphylaxis Registry via an online questionnaire, after in-depth review of food-induced anaphylaxis cases in a tertiary paediatric allergy centre. RESULTS 3514 cases of food anaphylaxis were reported between July 2007 - March 2018, 56% in patients younger than 18 years. Peanut anaphylaxis was recorded in 459 children and adolescents (85% of all peanut anaphylaxis cases). Previous reactions (42% vs. 38%; p = .001), asthma comorbidity (47% vs. 35%; p < .001), relevant cofactors (29% vs. 22%; p = .004) and biphasic reactions (10% vs. 4%; p = .001) were more commonly reported in peanut anaphylaxis. Most cases were labelled as severe anaphylaxis (Ring&Messmer grade III 65% vs. 56% and grade IV 1.1% vs. 0.9%; p = .001). Self-administration of intramuscular adrenaline was low (17% vs. 15%), professional adrenaline administration was higher in non-peanut food anaphylaxis (34% vs. 26%; p = .003). Hospitalization was higher for peanut anaphylaxis (67% vs. 54%; p = .004). CONCLUSIONS The European Anaphylaxis Registry data confirmed peanut as one of the major causes of severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reactions in European children, with some characteristic features e.g., presence of asthma comorbidity and increased rate of biphasic reactions. Usage of intramuscular adrenaline as first-line treatment is low and needs to be improved. The Registry, designed as the largest database on anaphylaxis, allows continuous assessment of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana Maris
- Bon Secours Hospital Cork/Paediatrics and Child HealthUniversity College Cork Cork Ireland
| | - Sabine Dölle‐Bierke
- Division of Allergy and Immunology Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | | | - Lars Lange
- Department of Paediatrics St. Marien‐Hospital Bonn Germany
| | - Alice Koehli
- Division of Allergology University Children’s Hospital Zurich Zürich Switzerland
| | - Thomas Spindler
- Department of Paediatrics Medical Campus Hochgebirgsklinik Davos Davos Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Hourihane
- Paediatrics and Child Health Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland
- Children’s Health Ireland Dublin Ireland
| | | | - Katja Nemat
- Practice for paediatric pneumology and allergology Kinderzentrum Dresden‐Friedrichstadt Dresden Germany
| | - C. Kemen
- Department of Paediatrics Children’s Hospital WILHELMSTIFT Hamburg Germany
| | - Irena Neustädter
- Department of Paediatrics Hallerwiese Cnopfsche Kinderklinik Nuremberg Germany
| | - Christian Vogelberg
- Department of Paediatrics Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav CarusTechnical University Dresden Germany
| | - Thomas Reese
- Department of Paediatrics Mathias‐Spital Rheine Rheine Germany
| | - Ismail Yildiz
- Department of Paediatrics Friedrich‐Ebert‐Krankenhaus Neumuenster Germany
| | - Zsolt Szepfalusi
- Division of Paediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Competence Center Paediatrics Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Paediatric Dermatology and Allergology Epidermolysis bullosa‐Centre HannoverChildren’s Hospital AUF DER BULT Hanover Germany
| | - Helen Straube
- Division of Allergology Darmstädter Kinderkliniken Prinzessin Margaret Darmstadt Germany
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department 2nd Paediatric Clinic National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
- Division of Infection Immunity& Respiratory Medicine University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Susanne Hämmerling
- Division of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology University Children`s Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
| | - Ute Staden
- Paediatric Pneumology & Allergology Medical practice Klettke/Staden Berlin Germany
| | - Michael Polz
- Department of Paediatrics GPR Klinikum Rüsselsheim Germany
| | - Tihomir Mustakov
- Chair of Allergy University Hospital Alexandrovska Sofia Bulgaria
| | - Ewa Cichocka‐Jarosz
- Department of Paediatrics Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
| | - Renata Cocco
- Division of Allergy Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Department of Paediatrics Federal University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
| | | | | | - Margitta Worm
- Division of Allergy and Immunology Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Striegel AK, Price M, Frandsen V, Gernert S, Arens A, Wiesenäcker D, Lange L. Der Stand der allergologischen Weiterbildung von Kinderärzten. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-020-00850-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Ein deutlicher Rückgang abgelegter Prüfungen im Fach Allergologie und gleichzeitig eine Zunahme allergologischer Erkrankungen haben die Nachwuchsgruppe der Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Allergologie und Umweltmedizin (GPAU) dazu bewogen, die Qualität und die Bedingungen der allergologischen Ausbildung in der Pädiatrie zu untersuchen. Zeitgleich wurde beim Deutschen Ärztetag ein neues Format der Zusatzweiterbildung Allergologie (Musterweiterbildungsordnung [MWBO]) verabschiedet.
Ziel der Arbeit
Ziel dieser Umfrage war es, die Rahmenbedingungen der allergologischen Ausbildung von Kinderärzten in Deutschland genauer zu untersuchen.
Material und Methoden
Es wurde eine Umfrage mithilfe eines Fragebogens sowohl bei den Weiterbildungsermächtigten (insgesamt 169) als auch bei deren Weiterbildungsassistent*innen durchgeführt.
Ergebnisse und Diskussion
Von insgesamt 56 Weiterbildungsermächtigten und 32 Weiterbildungsassistent*innen wurde der Fragebogen ausgewertet. Es zeigt sich in der Auswertung, dass der Prozentsatz an Frauen bei den Weiterbildungsermächtigten deutlich geringer ist im Vergleich zu den Weiterbildungsassistent*innen (20 vs. 66 %), jedoch sind mittlerweile mehr als zwei Drittel der Medizinstudierenden weiblich. In der Umfrage stellt sich heraus, dass die allergologische Weiterbildung bei fast 20 % der Weiterbildungsassistent*innen weniger als 10 % der Gesamtarbeitszeit ausmacht und oft außerhalb der Regelarbeitszeit stattfindet. Es sind in Zukunft sowohl flexiblere Arbeitszeitmodelle als auch kombinierte Ausbildungsmodelle zwischen Klinik und Praxis und feste Strukturen für eine fundierte Ausbildung im klinischen Alltag notwendig, um der wachsenden Anzahl allergologischer Fragestellungen v. a. bei Kindern flächendeckend gerecht werden zu können. In der neuen MWBO darf nicht nur der Nachweis von Untersuchungstechniken eine Rolle spielen, sondern sie muss auch die Betreuung von komplexen allergologischen Fällen abbilden, die gerade in der Pädiatrie vorzufinden sind, z. B. im Rahmen von Hospitationen.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ballmer-Weber BK, Lidholm J, Lange L, Pascal M, Lang C, Gernert S, Lozano-Blasco J, Gräni N, Guillod C, Wangorsch A, Hanschmann KM, Pontoppidan B, Tjäder L, Bartra J, Vieths S. Allergen Recognition Patterns in Walnut Allergy Are Age Dependent and Correlate with the Severity of Allergic Reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019; 7:1560-1567.e6. [PMID: 30708144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Walnut is an important elicitor of food allergy in children and adults with a high rate of severe reactions. Multicenter studies using a common clinical protocol and a comprehensive allergen are lacking. OBJECTIVE To investigate potential correlations between molecular sensitization patterns and clinical characteristics of walnut-allergic patients. METHODS A total of 91 walnut-allergic subjects and 24 tolerant controls from Switzerland, Germany, and Spain were included. Walnut allergy was established by food challenge in all but anaphylactic subjects. Specific IgE (sIgE) to walnut extract, rJug r 1 (2S albumin), rJug r 3 (nonspecific lipid transfer protein 1), nJug r 4 (11S globulin), rJug r 5 (PR-10 protein), 2 vicilin fractions, profiling, and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant was determined by ImmunoCAP. A threshold of 0.10 kUA/L was used for positivity. RESULTS Sensitivity of sIgE to walnut extract was 87% and increased to 96% for the sum of all walnut components. sIgE to walnut extract and all walnut components, except rJug r 5, was significantly higher in patients younger than 14 years at inclusion. Stratification by age at onset of walnut allergy led to similar results. All patients younger than 14 years had severe reactions, whereas 38% of patients 14 years or older were mild reactors. Severe reactors (n = 70) had higher sIgE levels than did mild reactors (n = 21) to walnut extract (P < .0001), rJug r 1 (P < .0001), nJug r 4 (P = .0003), and both vicilin fractions (P < .0001), but not to Jug r 3 and Jug r 5. CONCLUSIONS Sensitization to walnut storage proteins is acquired in childhood and correlates with severe reactions. sIgE levels to storage proteins Jug r 1 and Jug r 4 and vicilin fractions, but not to nonspecific lipid transfer protein and PR-10 proteins, correlate with systemic reactions to walnut.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara K Ballmer-Weber
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, Switzerland.
| | | | - Lars Lange
- Department of Pediatrics, St Marien Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mariona Pascal
- Servei d'Immunologia, CDB, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Lang
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jaime Lozano-Blasco
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Esplugues de Llobregat (Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nora Gräni
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Guillod
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Joan Bartra
- Secció d'Allèrgia, Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
|
11
|
Kuhl CK, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, Textor J, Gernert S, Sonntag C, Schild HH. Sensitivity encoding for diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2005; 234:517-26. [PMID: 15671005 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342031626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively evaluate whether diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) at 3.0 T can help to improve image quality and confidence in and accuracy of diagnosis of ischemic lesions, compared with DW MR imaging with conventional phase encoding, in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients provided informed consent after the study had been explained, and the institutional review board approved the study protocol. Eighty-five patients (46 male and 39 female patients; age range, 13-86 years; mean age, 52 years) underwent single-shot spin-echo echo-planar DW MR imaging at 3.0 T twice, in a randomized order: once with conventional phase encoding (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 4283/79) and once with SENSE (3141/69, with a reduction factor of three). With both, 128 x 128 matrix, 24 4-mm-thick sections, and two b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) were used. An eight-element SENSE-compatible receive-only surface coil was used; the built-in body coil served for radiofrequency transmission and generation of the coil sensitivity profile. SENSE and conventional phase encoding were compared for image quality, signal-to-noise ratio, relative signal intensity (SI), and lesion contrast. Two neuroradiologists read images. Diagnostic accuracy of and confidence in detection of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) lesions with conventional phase encoding and SENSE at MR imaging were compared; matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test statistical significance. RESULTS No major SENSE-related artifacts were seen. At MR imaging with SENSE, consistently and significantly (P < .001) higher image quality scores were achieved because of substantial reduction of image distortions and blurring. Lesion contrast was equivalent with both techniques. Diagnostic confidence for demonstration and exclusion of lesions was significantly (P < .001) higher at MR imaging with SENSE. In three patients, small microembolic lesions were only prospectively diagnosed at MR imaging with SENSE, whereas they were masked by adjacent susceptibility effects and therefore overlooked at MR imaging with conventional phase encoding. CONCLUSION Parallel MR imaging with SENSE is feasible at 3.0 T. It significantly improves image quality, particularly by reducing or even preventing susceptibility-induced SI changes and image blurring. There was a significantly improved diagnostic confidence with which ADC changes were identified or excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuhl CK, Textor J, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, Gernert S, Urbach H, Schild HH. Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2004; 234:509-16. [PMID: 15601894 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342031323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), image quality, and confidence in diagnosis between 1.5- and 3.0-T diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of ischemic stroke lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study design was approved by the institutional review board, and all patients gave informed consent. In a prospective intraindividual study, 25 patients who had clinical symptoms consistent with ischemic stroke underwent DW MR imaging at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. The 3.0- or 1.5-T examination was performed immediately one after the other, in random order. Two readers in consensus recorded the presence and number of ischemic lesions and rated image quality and lesion conspicuity. The image SNR and the CNR of the ischemic lesions were quantified. Paired Student t and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were used to test for statistical significance. RESULTS Image quality at 3.0-T DW MR imaging was consistently lower than that at 1.5-T DW MR imaging owing to greater image distortions (P < .05). Yet, overall SNR and lesion CNR at 3.0 T increased significantly; mean increases were 48.8% (P < .001) and 96.3% (P < .01), respectively. The higher overall SNR and lesion CNR translated into a significantly higher sensitivity in the detection of ischemic lesions at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T. Of the total of 48 lesions that were identified in 19 of the 25 patients, 47 (98%) were diagnosed at 3.0 T and 36 (75%) were diagnosed at 1.5 T. In addition, the conspicuity of the lesions that were visible with both systems was significantly higher at 3.0 T (P < .001). CONCLUSION Although 3.0-T DW MR imaging generates greater image distortions, it yields increased SNR and CNR compared with DW MR imaging at 1.5 T. The increased CNR at 3.0 T translates into a significantly improved diagnostic confidence in the detection of focal apparent diffusion coefficient changes in the setting of subacute and acute ischemic stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kuhl CK, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, Textor HJ, Gernert S, Sonntag C, Schild H. Diffusion imaging at 3.0 T with and without SENSE. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2004. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
14
|
Siebenlist D, Kötter K, Gernert S. Treatment and prognosis of patients with nontraumatic rhabdomyolysis. Crit Care 1999. [PMCID: PMC3301912 DOI: 10.1186/cc584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
HIV infection of CD4+ peripheral blood lymphocytes leads to a loss of MHC class I molecules on the surface of the infected cells as detectable by monoclonal antibody staining and flow cytometry. Incubation of the infected cells at 26 degrees C or treatment at 37 degrees C with peptides leads to upregulation of MHC class I to levels equal to those found on uninfected cells cultured under the same conditions. The data suggest that, after HIV infection, the mechanisms responsible for peptide generation, peptide transport and thus stable association between peptides and MHC class I molecules are severely affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Kerkau
- Institute of Virology and Immunobiology, University of Würzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|