1
|
Ahillan T, Emmerson M, Swift B, Golamgouse H, Song K, Roxas A, Mendha SB, Avramović E, Rastogi J, Sultan B. COVID-19 in the homeless population: a scoping review and meta-analysis examining differences in prevalence, presentation, vaccine hesitancy and government response in the first year of the pandemic. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23:155. [PMID: 36918758 PMCID: PMC10012317 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08037-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have been identified as being increasingly susceptible to Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), with policies enacted to test, isolate, increase hygiene practices and prioritise vaccines among this population. Here, we conduct a scoping review of the current evidence-base pertaining to the prevalence and presentation of COVID-19 in PEH, COVID-vaccine hesitancy rates and government interventions enacted within the first year of the pandemic for PEH. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was conducted on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and MedRxiv databases for studies reporting primary data on COVID-19 prevalence and clinical characteristics in PEH, vaccine uptake for PEH and policies enacted targeting PEH. Study qualities were assessed with The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's set of Study Quality. RESULTS Eighty-three studies were included in our final analysis. The overall prevalence of symptomatic COVID-19 infection in PEH is estimated at 35%. The most common symptoms found were cough and shortness of breath, followed by fever. Concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy amongst PEH related to thoroughness of COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, side effects and mistrust of the government. The main strategies implemented by governments were mass testing, adaption of healthcare service provision, provision of alternative housing, encouraging personal hygiene (hand sanitation and mask wearing), and inter-organisational communication. DISCUSSION In our meta-analysis, 35% of PEH with a COVID-19 infection presented symptomatically; the low prevalence of symptomatic COVID-19 infection suggests widespread testing following outbreaks would be beneficial for this group of individuals. Temporary recuperation units and measures for housing stability in the pandemic, namely provision of alternative housing and stopping evictions, were found to be highly effective. High rates of vaccine hesitancy means that education and encouragement towards vaccination would be beneficial for this vulnerable population, where comorbidities are common. Finally increased focus in research should be placed on the mental health burden of COVID-19 and the pandemic on PEH moving forwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bethan Swift
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Binta Sultan
- Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zarifkar P, Kamath A, Robinson C, Morgulchik N, Shah SFH, Cheng TKM, Dominic C, Fehintola AO, Bhalla G, Ahillan T, Mourgue d'Algue L, Lee J, Pareek A, Carey M, Hughes DJ, Miller M, Woodcock VK, Shrotri M. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e180-e191. [PMID: 33261978 PMCID: PMC7674130 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Much of routine cancer care has been disrupted due to the perceived susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients. Here, we systematically review the current evidence base pertaining to the prevalence, presentation and outcome of COVID-19 in cancer patients, in order to inform policy and practice going forwards. A keyword-structured systematic search was conducted on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and MedRxiv databases for studies reporting primary data on COVID-19 in cancer patients. Studies were critically appraised using the NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's quality assessment tool set. The pooled prevalence of cancer as a co-morbidity in patients with COVID-19 and pooled in-hospital mortality risk of COVID-19 in cancer patients were derived by random-effects meta-analyses. In total, 110 studies from 10 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of cancer as a co-morbidity in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 was 2.6% (95% confidence interval 1.8%, 3.5%, I2: 92.0%). Specifically, 1.7% (95% confidence interval 1.3%, 2.3%, I2: 57.6.%) in China and 5.6% (95% confidence interval 4.5%, 6.7%, I2: 82.3%) in Western countries. Patients most commonly presented with non-specific symptoms of fever, dyspnoea and chest tightness in addition to decreased arterial oxygen saturation, ground glass opacities on computer tomography and non-specific changes in inflammatory markers. The pooled in-hospital mortality risk among patients with COVID-19 and cancer was 14.1% (95% confidence interval 9.1%, 19.8%, I2: 52.3%). We identified impeding questions that need to be answered to provide the foundation for an iterative review of the developing evidence base, and inform policy and practice going forwards. Analyses of the available data corroborate an unfavourable outcome of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and cancer. Our findings encourage future studies to report detailed social, demographic and clinical characteristics of cancer patients, including performance status, primary cancer type and stage, as well as a history of anti-cancer therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Zarifkar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - A Kamath
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Divisional Office, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - C Robinson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Divisional Office, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - N Morgulchik
- Imperial College London, Department of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, London, UK
| | - S F H Shah
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - T K M Cheng
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Dominic
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A O Fehintola
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - G Bhalla
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - T Ahillan
- University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | | | - J Lee
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - A Pareek
- Department of Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - M Carey
- Department of Palliative Care Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sobell House Hospice, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - D J Hughes
- Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Miller
- Department of Palliative Care Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sobell House Hospice, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - V K Woodcock
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Shrotri
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lokugamage AU, Ahillan T, Pathberiya SDC. Decolonising ideas of healing in medical education. J Med Ethics 2020; 46:265-272. [PMID: 32029542 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The legacy of colonial rule has permeated into all aspects of life and contributed to healthcare inequity. In response to the increased interest in social justice, medical educators are thinking of ways to decolonise education and produce doctors who can meet the complex needs of diverse populations. This paper aims to explore decolonising ideas of healing within medical education following recent events including the University College London Medical School's Decolonising the Medical Curriculum public engagement event, the Wellcome Collection's Ayurvedic Man: Encounters with Indian Medicine exhibition and its symposium on Decolonising Health, SOAS University of London's Applying a Decolonial Lens to Research Structures, Norms and Practices in Higher Education Institutions and University College London Anthropology Department's Flourishing Diversity Series. We investigate implications of 'recentring' displaced indigenous healing systems, medical pluralism and highlight the concept of cultural humility in medical training, which while challenging, may benefit patients. From a global health perspective, climate change debates and associated civil protests around the issues resonate with indigenous ideas of planetary health, which focus on the harmonious interconnection of the planet, the environment and human beings. Finally, we look further at its implications in clinical practice, addressing the background of inequality in healthcare among the BAME (Black, Asian and minority ethnic) populations, intersectionality and an increasing recognition of the role of inter-generational trauma originating from the legacy of slavery. By analysing these theories and conversations that challenge the biomedical view of health, we conclude that encouraging healthcare educators and professionals to adopt a 'decolonising attitude' can address the complex power imbalances in health and further improve person-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amali U Lokugamage
- Clinical and Professional Practice, University College London Medical School, London, UK
- Women's Health, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lokugamage AU, Eftime VAI, Porter D, Ahillan T, Ke SX. Birth preparation acupuncture for normalising birth: An analysis of NHS service routine data and proof of concept. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2020; 40:1096-1101. [PMID: 31971456 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1694878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
A number of studies show that acupuncture may help with labour and delivery. An NHS maternity acupuncture service providing birth preparation acupuncture has assessed its routine hospital maternity annual data from 2014 to 2016 to see what effect it had on labour and delivery outcomes. The data from this service was analysed and women who had birth preparation acupuncture were compared with those who did not receive it. Maternal age, parity and socio-economic status were considered confounders and were adjusted for in the analysis. Women who received acupuncture had more normal births (less surgical births) [OR 0.76 (0.64, 0.91)], required less intrapartum analgesia [OR 0.74 (0.63, 0.86)], fewer components of an induction of labour [OR 0.74 (0.61, 0.91)] and a reduced length of a hospital stay [OR 0.91 (0.87, 0.95)]. The patients highly valued the availability of acupuncture within the maternity service as it enhanced their patient journey.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Numerous studies provide evidence for the effects of acupuncture in normalising pregnancy and birth. These effects include musculoskeletal preparation of the pelvis, cervical ripening, enhancing endogenous oxytocin release, and analgesic properties.What do the results of this study add? Our analysis shows that women who received birth preparation acupuncture had fewer surgical births, required less intrapartum analgesia, less components of induction of labour and had a reduced length of hospital stay, supporting the use of maternity acupuncture in normalising birth outcomes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The findings show that acupuncture, by potentially normalising birth, may lead to reductions in costs of service. Further, additional research is required to see whether acupuncture is cost effective and could have an adjunctive role as a complementary therapy for improving birth outcomes and a woman's experience of childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A U Lokugamage
- Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,University College Medical School, London, UK
| | - V A I Eftime
- Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Asante Academy of Chinese Medicine, London, UK
| | - D Porter
- University College Medical School, London, UK
| | - T Ahillan
- University College Medical School, London, UK
| | - S X Ke
- Asante Academy of Chinese Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|