Clinical evaluation of an authorized medical equipment based on high performance liquid chromatography for measurement of serum voriconazole concentration

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring for voriconazole is recommended for its optimum pharmacotherapy. Although the feedback of the measurement result of serum voriconazole concentration by outsourcing needs a certain time (days within a 1 week), there was no medical equipment for the measurement available in clinical practice. Recently, a medical equipment based on high performance liquid chromatography, named LM1010, has been developed and authorized for clinical use. In this study, to validate the clinical performance of LM1010, we compared the measured serum voriconazole concentrations by LM1010 with those by outsourcing measurement using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

METHODS

We conducted the observational study approved by the institutional review board of Kumamoto University Hospital (No. 1786). Residual serum samples harvested for therapeutic drug monitoring were separated. Measured concentrations by LM1010 by the standard filter method (needs serum volume of > 400 μL) or the dilute method (needs serum volume of 150 μL) were compared with those by outsourcing, respectively. Acceptable measurement error range of 0.72-1.33 was considered. There were 69 serum samples, where the 35 or 34 samples were employed for evaluation of the standard filter method or the dilute method, respectively.

RESULTS

The measured concentration using the standard filter method/outsourcing was 2.22/2.10 μg/mL as the median, 1.57-3.40/1.53-3.62 as the interquartile range, < 0.2-10.76/< 0.2-11.46 μg/mL as the range, while those using the dilute method/outsourcing was 2.36/2.29 μg/mL as the median, 1.08-2.94/1.03-3.06 as the interquartile range, 0.24-10.00/< 0.2-10.85 μg/mL as the range. The regression line for the standard filter method or the dilute method were y = 0.935x + 0.154 or y = 0.933x + 0.162, respectively. The standard filter method or the dilute method showed 11.4% samples (4/35, 95%CI 3.2-26.7%) or 8.8% samples (3/34, 95%CI 1.9-23.7%) out of the acceptable measurement error range, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of serum voriconazole concentration by LM1010 can be acceptable in clinical TDM practice.

Lowered Risk of Nephrotoxicity through Intervention against the Combined Use of Vancomycin and Tazobactam/Piperacillin: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a major risk factor for nephrotoxicity. We sought to evaluate interventions against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. This retrospective cohort study involved patients who considered the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC as a treatment. Patients that had either or both antimicrobials replaced were assigned to the intervention group, whereas those who were continued on combination therapy were assigned to the comparison group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). The survival rate of patients on day 30 was evaluated as the secondary endpoint. The comparison and intervention groups were composed of 65 and 68 patients, respectively, and the incidence rates of AKI were 44.6% and 17.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified the intervention as the only independent factor against AKI development, with a hazard ratio of 0.282 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.565). For the incidence of AKI of grade greater than 1, the hazard ratio was 0.114 (95% CI, 0.025 to 0.497). The survival rates on day 30 in the comparison and intervention groups were 92.3% and 91.2%, respectively, with a relative risk of 0.988 (95% CI, 0.892 to 1.094). The trough VCM concentration was not associated with the incidence of AKI in patients receiving the combination therapy. This study demonstrated that intervention against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC can lower the risk of nephrotoxicity. IMPORTANCE The combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a major risk factor for nephrotoxicity. We retrospectively evaluated interventions against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. Patients for whom either or both antimicrobials were replaced were assigned to the intervention group (65 patients), whereas those who were continued on combination therapy were assigned to the comparison group (68 patients). The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). The incidence rates of AKI in the intervention and comparison groups were 44.6% and 17.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified intervention as the only independent factor against AKI development, with a hazard ratio of 0.282 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.565). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that intervention against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC can lower the risk of nephrotoxicity.

Development and evaluation of a vancomycin dosing nomogram to achieve the target area under the concentration-time curve. A retrospective study

Although the superiority of vancomycin dosing based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_0-24) over that based on trough concentration has been reported, a dosing strategy to achieve the target AUC_0-24 has yet to be developed. The objective of this study was to develop a convenient useable nomogram for vancomycin dosing to obtain the target AUC_0-24 (400 μg h/mL). The nomogram was pharmacokinetically developed in a retrospective manner. The number of enrolled patients and concentrations was 166 and 309 for development of the nomogram, 99 and 181 for evaluation of the nomogram, respectively. The nomogram was developed as doses per personal body weight corresponding to each range of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which was identified to be the covariate for vancomycin clearance by non-linear mixed effect modeling. The nomogram described the surrogate trough concentration for the target AUC_0-24 was calculatedly different for each eGFR range (9.3-15.0 μg/mL). The rate of attainment of therapeutic range using surrogate trough concentration to obtain the target AUC_0-24 was 63.8% in the evaluation period. We have developed and evaluated the first convenient useable nomogram of vancomycin dosing to obtain the target AUC_0-24.

Continuous high-dose infusion of doripenem in a pneumonia patient infected by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a case report

Background

Despite the high mortality of patients with sepsis and carbapenem-resistant bacteria infection, appropriate antimicrobial therapies are yet to be established. Here, we have reported the case of a patient with pneumonia that subsequently developed by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and was treated with a continuous high-dose infusion of doripenem.

Case presentation

We started a continuous intravenous infusion of doripenem 3 g/day although the 59-year-old woman (body weight, 45 kg) had developed septic acute kidney injury, followed by continuous renal replacement therapy (the effluent flow rate was 650 mL/h). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of doripenem was 8 mg/L. The concentration of unbound doripenem in the serum was measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Twenty hours after the initial dose, the patient’s serum level of doripenem was 47.8 μg/mL; the level decreased to 33.6 μg/mL at 111 h after initial dosing. The unbound doripenem concentration in the serum was maintained four times above the MIC throughout the treatment. After the completion of 11 days of dosing, the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit. During the treatment period, the MIC remained at 8 mg/L.

Conclusions

A continuous high-dose infusion of doripenem is a potentially efficient strategy for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful for patients displaying variable pharmacokinetics, because the MIC is generally high in resistant bacteria.