Erratum: CXCL12-mediated monocyte transmigration into brain perivascular space leads to neuroinflammation and memory deficit in neuropathic pain: Erratum

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7150/thno.44364.].

CXCL12-mediated monocyte transmigration into brain perivascular space leads to neuroinflammation and memory deficit in neuropathic pain

Emerging clinical and experimental evidence demonstrates that neuroinflammation plays an important role in cognitive impairment associated with neuropathic pain. However, how peripheral nerve challenge induces remote inflammation in the brain remains largely unknown. Methods: The circulating leukocytes and plasma C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) and brain perivascular macrophages (PVMs) were analyzed by flow cytometry, Western blotting, ELISA, and immunostaining in spared nerve injury (SNI) mice. The memory function was evaluated with a novel object recognition test (NORT) in mice and with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in chronic pain patients. Results: The classical monocytes and CXCL12 in the blood, PVMs in the perivascular space, and gliosis in the brain, particularly in the hippocampus, were persistently increased following SNI in mice. Using the transgenic CCR2RFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/+ mice, we discovered that at least some of the PVMs were recruited from circulating monocytes. The SNI-induced increase in hippocampal PVMs, gliosis, and memory decline were substantially prevented by either depleting circulating monocytes via intravenous injection of clodronate liposomes or blockade of CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling. On the contrary, intravenous injection of CXCL12 at a pathological concentration in naïve mice mimicked SNI effects. Significantly, we found that circulating monocytes and plasma CXCL12 were elevated in chronic pain patients, and both of them were closely correlated with memory decline. Conclusion: CXCL12-mediated monocyte recruitment into the perivascular space is critical for neuroinflammation and the resultant cognitive impairment in neuropathic pain.

Differential regulation of GSK-3β in spinal dorsal horn and in hippocampus mediated by interleukin-1beta contributes to pain hypersensitivity and memory deficits following peripheral nerve injury

Accumulating evidence shows that inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3β) ameliorates cognitive impairments caused by a diverse array of diseases. Our previous work showed that spared nerve injury (SNI) that induces neuropathic pain causes short-term memory deficits. Here, we reported that GSK-3β activity was enhanced in hippocampus and reduced in spinal dorsal horn following SNI, and the changes persisted for at least 45 days. Repetitive applications of selective GSK-3β inhibitors (SB216763, 5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, three times or AR-A014418, 400 ng/kg, intrathecally, seven times) prevented short-term memory deficits but did not affect neuropathic pain induced by SNI. Surprisingly, we found that the repetitive SB216763 or AR-A014418 induced a persistent pain hypersensitivity in sham animals. Mechanistically, both β-catenin and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were upregulated in spinal dorsal horn but downregulated in hippocampus following SNI. Injections of SB216763 prevented the BDNF downregulation in hippocampus but enhanced its upregulation in spinal dorsal horn in SNI rats. In sham rats, SB216763 upregulated both β-catenin and BDNF in spinal dorsal horn but affect neither of them in hippocampus. Finally, intravenous injection of interleukin-1beta that induces pain hypersensitivity and memory deficits mimicked the SNI-induced the differential regulation of GSK-3β/β-catenin/BDNF in spinal dorsal horn and in hippocampus. Accordingly, the prolonged opposite changes of GSK-3β activity in hippocampus and in spinal dorsal horn induced by SNI may contribute to memory deficits and neuropathic pain by differential regulation of BDNF in the two regions. GSK-3β inhibitors that treat cognitive disorders may result in a long-lasting pain hypersensitivity.

[Comparation study of incidental irradiation dose to the internal mammary chain during postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients treated with different irradiation techniques]

Objective: To evaluated the unplanned coverage dose to the internal mammary chain (IMC) in patient treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Methods: One hundred and thirty eight patients with breast cancer receiving radiotherapy (RT) in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) group, forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (F-IMRT) group and inverse IMRT (I-IMRT) group. The IMC were contoured according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) consensus, and were not include into the planning target volume (PTV). The incidental irradiation dose to IMC among the three groups and the first three intercostal spaces IMC (ICS-IMC 1-3) were all compared, and explored the relationship between the mean doses (Dmean) of IMC and the OARs (ipsilateral lung and heart). Results: The dose delivered to IMC showed no difference in CRT, F-IMRT and I-IMRT(33.80 Gy, 29.65 Gy and 32.95 Gy). And 10.42%, 2.04%, and 9.76% patients achieved ≥45 Gy when treated with CRT, F-IMRT and I-IMRT. For the IMC dose in the first three intercostal spaces (ICS1-3), there was no difference to the three treatment plannings. The Dmean, V(20), V(30), V(40) and V(50) of the ICS-IMC2 and ICS-IMC3 were all obviously superior than ICS-IMC1 for all these three plannings. Moderate positive correlation was founded between Dmean for IMC and Dmean for heart for left breast cancer patients underwent CRT (r=0.338, P=0.01). Whereas for F-IMRT and I-IMRT groups, positive correlation were founded between Dmean for IMC and Dmean and V(20) for ipsilateral lung for all patients (F-IMRT: r=0.366, P=0.010; r=0.318, P=0.026; I-IMRT: r=0.427, P=0.005; r=0.411, P=0.008). Conclusions: In 3D-CRT, F-IMRT and I-IMRT planning methods, partial patients get IMC irradiated doses that could achieve therapeutic doses. Compared with 3D-CRT, F-IMRT and I-IMRT further reduced the dose of irradiated organs. However, there is no difference in the dose coverage of IMC for the three planned approaches when the IMC made an unplanned target.