Effects of inappropriate cause-of-death certification on mortality from cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in Tonga

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes mellitus are major health issues in Tonga and other Pacific countries, although mortality levels and trends are unclear. We assess the impacts of cause-of-death certification on coding of CVD and diabetes as underlying causes of death (UCoD).

METHODS

Tongan records containing cause-of-death data (2001-2018), including medical certificates of cause-of-death (MCCD), had UCoD assigned according to International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) coding rules. Deaths without recorded cause were included to ascertain total mortality. Diabetes and hypertension causes were reallocated from Part 1 of the MCCD (direct cause) to Part 2 (contributory cause) if potentially fatal complications were not recorded, and an alternative UCoD was assigned. Proportional mortality by cause based on the alternative UCoD were applied to total deaths then mortality rates calculated by age and sex using census/intercensal population estimates. CVD and diabetes mortality rates for unaltered and alternative UCoD were compared using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Over 2001-18, in ages 35-59 years, alternative CVD mortality was higher than unaltered CVD mortality in men (p = 0.043) and women (p = 0.15); for 2010-18, alternative versus unaltered measures in men were 3.3/103 (95%CI: 3.0-3.7/103) versus 2.9/103 (95%CI: 2.6-3.2/103), and in women were 1.1/103 (95%CI: 0.9-1.3/103) versus 0.9/103 (95%CI: 0.8-1.1/103). Conversely, alternative diabetes mortality rates were significantly lower than the unaltered rates over 2001-18 in men (p < 0.0001) and women (p = 0.013); for 2010-18, these measures in men were 1.3/103 (95%CI: 1.1-1.5/103) versus 1.9/103 (95%CI: 1.6-2.2/103), and in women were 1.4/103 (95%CI: 1.2-1.7/103) versus 1.7/103 (95%CI: 1.5-2.0/103). Diabetes mortality rates increased significantly over 2001-18 in men (unaltered: p < 0.0001; alternative: p = 0.0007) and increased overall in women (unaltered: p = 0.0015; alternative: p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes reporting in Part 1 of the MCCD, without potentially fatal diabetes complications, has led to over-estimation of diabetes, and under-estimation of CVD, as UCoD in Tonga. This indicates the importance of controlling various modifiable risks for atherosclerotic CVD (including stroke) including hypertension, tobacco use, and saturated fat intake, besides obesity and diabetes. Accurate certification of diabetes as a direct cause of death (Part 1) or contributory factor (Part 2) is needed to ensure that valid UCoD are assigned. Examination of multiple cause-of-death data can improve understanding of the underlying causes of premature mortality to better inform health planning.

Cause of death certificates in nursing homes: Does quality matter? A retrospective review from two counties in Norway

AIMS

One half of Norwegians die in nursing homes, where death certificates (DCs) are completed by two types of physicians: in-house physicians or physicians on call. The aims of this study were to examine differences in the quality of DCs due to type of physician and to uncover possible implications of errors for the public statistics.

METHODS

DCs from the year 2013 from nursing homes in the catchment area of Akershus University Hospital were examined with regard to logical deficiencies, garbage code diagnoses and type of certifying physician. In one third of cases, the registered causes of death were compared to information in the medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 873 DCs from 24 nursing homes were evaluated. Physicians on call certified 46% of all deaths. Logical deficiencies were found in 34% of all DCs and were more common in DCs from physicians on call. Garbage code diagnoses were used in every third DC, with 'sudden death' or 'cause of death unknown' preferred by physicians on call and 'unspecified pneumonia' preferred by in-house physicians. Comparisons against medical records uncovered missing information in 49% and 35% of DCs from physicians on call and in-house physicians, respectively. A dementia diagnosis was frequently overlooked by both physician types. Garbage code diagnoses were more common in DCs with missing information from medical records.

CONCLUSIONS

Error rates in DCs in nursing homes in Norway are high. The results raise concerns about the validity of public cause of death statistics.

Accuracy of death certifications of diabetes, dementia and cancer in Australia: a population-based cohort study

Background

National mortality statistics are only based on the underlying cause of death, which may considerably underestimate the effects of some chronic conditions.

Methods

The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for diabetes (a common precursor to multimorbidity), dementia (a potential accelerant of death) and cancer (expected to be well-recorded) were calculated from death certificates for 9 056 women from the 1921–26 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Log binomial regression models were fitted to examine factors associated with the sensitivity of death certificates with these conditions as underlying or contributing causes of death.

Results

Among women who had a record of each of these conditions in their lifetime, the sensitivity was 12.3% (95% confidence interval, 11.0%, 13.7%), 25.2% (23.7%, 26.7%) and 57.7% (55.9%, 59.5%) for diabetes, dementia and cancer, respectively, as the underlying cause of death, and 40.9% (38.8%, 42.9%), 52.3% (50.6%, 54.0%) and 67.1% (65.4%, 68.7%), respectively, if contributing causes of death were also taken into account. In all cases specificity (> 97%) and positive predictive value (> 91%) were high, and negative predictive value ranged from 69.6% to 84.6%. Sensitivity varied with age (in different directions for different conditions) but not consistently with the other sociodemographic factors.

Conclusions

Death rates associated with common conditions that occur in multimorbidity clusters in the elderly are underestimated in national mortality statistics, but would be improved if the multiple causes of death listed on a death certificate were taken into account in the statistics.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13304-8.

Characteristics of deceased and quality of death certificates for cases subjected to Indonesia's management of the dead protocol for bodies with COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted many aspects of life, including death care. International and national protocols have been implemented for the management of the dead. This study aims to determine the characteristics of decedents managed according to COVID-19 protocols in Indonesia and the quality of their death certificates. This study uses a descriptive, cross-sectional design. Secondary data of deaths with COVID-19 were taken from hospital death registries, medical records, and death certificates. Data were collected from nine referral hospitals and one funeral home in 6 cities in Indonesia. The majority of the decedents were male, Muslim, with a median age of 57. Most were treated in non-intensive isolation wards, and almost half had known comorbidities. Many were still awaiting the result of their confirmative PCR at the time of death. Almost all were managed compliant with the standard protocol, and most were buried in COVID-only cemeteries. There were still deficiencies in the completeness and accuracy of the death certificates. "COVID-19" was mentioned as a cause of death in only about half of the cases, with a wide variety of terms and spelling. Management of the dead protocols for bodies with COVID-19 can generally be implemented in Indonesia. The quality of the death certificates should, however, be continuously improved.

Unifying the death notification form: Recommendations by the Saudi Health Council task force

Objectives

Death reporting and certification forms are essential elements of a country's healthcare policies. KSA faces several challenges regarding death reporting and certification. This study aims to provide recommendations to unify death notifications in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

In 2019, the General Secretariat of the Saudi Health Council designed a qualitative research project that aimed to provide recommendations to unify death notifications. The council convened a task force of physicians and healthcare administrators to design and conduct qualitative research to review the Saudi Health Council's policies related to death certification and investigate potential methods of improvement. In addition, the task force performed an extensive review of the literature and current practices in KSA.

Results

The task force proposed a set of robust recommendations to correct the issues affecting the current systems of death reporting and certification.

Conclusions

This report presents the working methodology and recommendations of the task force.

Death Certification: Errors and Interventions

OBJECTIVE

Death certificates are legal documents containing critical information. Despite the importance of accurate certification, errors remain common. Estimates of error prevalence vary between studies, and error classification systems are often unclear. Relatively few studies have assessed the frequency at which death certification errors occur in US hospitals, and even fewer have attempted a standardized classification of errors based on their severity. In the current study, our objective was to evaluate the frequency of death certification errors at an academic center, implement a standardized method of categorizing error severity, and analyze sources of error to better identify ways to improve death certification accuracy.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of cause and manner of death certification at our regional academic institution for 179 cases in which autopsy was performed between 2013-2016. We compared non-pathologist physician completed death certificates with the cause and manner of death ultimately determined at autopsy.

METHODS

Errors were classified via a 5-point scale of increasing error severity. Grades I-IIc were considered minor errors, while III-V were considered severe. Sources of error were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the majority of cases (85%), death certificates contained ≥ one error, with multiple errors (51%) being more common than single (33%). The most frequent error type was Grade 1 (53%), followed by Grade III (30%), and Grade IIb (18%). The more severe Grade IV errors were seen in 23% of cases; no Grade V errors were found. No amendments were made to any death certificates following finalization of autopsy results during the study period.

CONCLUSION

This study reaffirms the importance of autopsy and autopsy pathologists in ensuring accurate and complete death certification. It also suggests that death certification errors may be more frequent than previously reported. We propose a method by which death certification errors can be classified in terms of increasing severity. By understanding the types of errors occurring on death certificates, academic institutions can work to improve certification accuracy. Better clinician education, coordination with autopsy pathologists, and implementation of a systematic approach to ensuring concordance of death certificates with autopsy results is recommended.

Manner of Death Certification After Significant Emotional Stress: An Inter-Rater Variability Study and Review of the Literature

Not commonly seen, the risk of sudden death after significant emotional stress has been reported since antiquity and incorporated into folk wisdom, reflected by phrases such as "scared to death" and "broken heart." A typical "victim" suffers from significant and often life-threatening natural diseases, making determination of the manner of death complicated, and at times controversial. The present study is designed to assess inter-rater variability and nonuniformity and controversy seen in manner of death certification in certain cases of death with significant stress involved in the circumstances of death. Members of the National Association of Medical Examiner (NAME) were surveyed to assess differences in manner of death certification for eight sudden unexpected death scenarios in middle-aged men and women with underlying cardiac disease after significant stressful events including: being chased down a lonely road followed by a verbal confrontation, a roll-over motor vehicle collision (MVC) without injuries, a fall from a wheelchair in a MVC, an alleged armed robbery, an involuntary commitment, an arrest by police, sexual intercourse, and a severe panic attack with breathing problems. In all cases, the autopsy examination revealed hypertensive and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In all cases, natural diseases were identified as significant contributing condtions, including emphysema in six cases and diabetes mellitus in three. Eighty-six responses were collected. The results show wide inter-rater variability, ranging from very good to poor (Kappa ranges from 0.16 to 0.94). One hundred fifty-five comments were collected. Most of the comments addressed more than one topic and were followed by discussions, open questions, and responders' experiences with previous cases and legal proceedings. Our data show that cases of sudden death after significant stress have almost complete agreement in four cases and very high inter-rater variability in the other four. We propose that a detailed analysis of each case and an algorithmic approach could improve the predictability of the outcomes of death investigations for the legal system and for families.

Physicians' knowledge and practice on death certification in the North West Bank, Palestine: across sectional study

Background

Mortality data are essential for many aspects of everyday public health practices at both national and international levels. Despite the current developments in various aspects of the medical field, the apparent inability of physicians to complete death notification forms (DNF) accurately is still worldwide concern. The aim of this study is to assess the physicians’ knowledge and practice on completing the DNF.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 200 physicians in governmental and non-governmental hospitals in the North West-Bank in Palestine. Furthermore, a case scenario was included in the questionnaire and physicians were asked to fill the cause of death section. The percentage of errors committed while completing the cause of death section were computed. A Chi square test was used to assess the association between physicians’ characteristics and their responses.

Results

Only 40.6% of the participants completed the cause of death section correctly. The immediate and underlying causes of death were correctly identified by 48.7% and 71.3% of physicians, respectively. Almost one-fifth (17.3%) of physicians wrote the mechanism of death without reporting the underlying cause of death and 14.7% of them reported the sequence of events leading to death incorrectly.

Conclusions

Physicians’ knowledge and practice on completing the DNF is poor and insufficient, which may seriously affect the accuracy of mortality data. Complicated cases, problems in the current design of the DNFs and lack of training were the most common factors contributing to inaccuracy in death certification. We recommend offering periodical training workshops on completing the DNF to all physicians, and developing a manual on completing the DNFs with clear instructions and guidelines.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2814-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

From Death to Death Certificate: What do the Dead say?

This is an overview of medicolegal death investigation and death certification. Postmortem toxicological analysis, particularly for ethanol and drugs of abuse, plays a large role in the forensic investigation of natural and unnatural deaths. Postmortem drug concentrations must be interpreted in light of the autopsy findings and circumstances. Interpretations of drug and ethanol concentrations are important for death certification, but they also may be important for other stakeholders such as police, attorneys, public health practitioners, and the next-of-kin.

Identifying cases of heroin toxicity where 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM) is not detected by toxicological analyses

PURPOSE

Heroin has a half-life of 2-6 min and is metabolized too quickly to be detected in autopsy samples. The presence of 6-acetylmophine (6-AM) in urine, blood, or other samples is convincing evidence of heroin use by a decedent, but 6-AM itself has a half-life of 6-25 min before it is hydrolyzed to morphine, so 6-AM may not be present in sufficient concentration to detect in postmortem samples. Codeine is often present in heroin preparations as an impurity and is not a metabolite of heroin. Studies report that a ratio of morphine to codeine greater than one indicates heroin use. We hypothesize that the ratio of morphine to codeine in our decedents abusing drugs intravenously will be no different in individuals with 6-AM present than in individuals where no 6-AM is detected, and we report our study of this hypothesis.

METHODS

All accidental deaths investigated by the Jefferson County Coroner/Medical Examiner Office from 2010 to 2013 with morphine detected in blood samples collected at autopsy were reviewed. Five deaths where trauma caused or contributed to death were excluded from the review. The presence or absence of 6-AM and the concentrations of morphine and codeine were recorded for each case. The ratio of morphine to codeine was calculated for all decedents. Any individual in whom no morphine or codeine was detected in a postmortem sample was excluded from further study. Absence or presence of drug paraphernalia or evidence of intravascular (IV) drug use was documented in each case to identify IV drug users. The proportion of the IV drug users with and without 6-AM present in a postmortem sample was compared to the M/C ratio for the individuals.

RESULTS

Of the 230 deaths included in the analysis, 103 IV drug users with quantifiable morphine and codeine in a postmortem sample were identified allowing for calculation of an M/C ratio. In these IV drug users, the M/C ratio was greater than 1 in 98 % of decedents. When controlling for the absence or presence of 6-AM there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of IV drug users when compared to non IV drug users with an M/C ratio of greater than 1 (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

The M/C ratio in IV drug users, if greater than 1, is seen in deaths due to heroin toxicity where 6-AM is detected in a postmortem sample. This study provides evidence that a M/C ratio greater than one in an IV drug user is evidence of a death due to heroin toxicity even if 6-AM is not detected in the blood. Using the M/C ratio, in addition to scene and autopsy findings, provides sufficient evidence to show heroin is the source of the morphine and codeine. Listing heroin as a cause or contributing factor in deaths with evidence of IV drug abuse and where the M/C ratio exceeds 1 will improve identification of heroin fatalities, which will allow better allocation of resources for public health initiatives.

The Certification of Fatalities Related to Diabetes Mellitus: A Shot in the Dark?

Worldwide, an estimated 415 million people have diabetes mellitus, which results in extensive morbidity and mortality. In order to track the effect of diabetes on mortality statistics, deaths in which diabetes mellitus caused or contributed to death must be recognized, included on the death certificate, and then properly coded for vital statistic purposes. For public health policy, this will help determine the extent of the disease and follow whether deaths increase or decrease. There is variation among death certifiers for when and how diabetes is included on the death certificate and among vital records bureaus as how to code diabetes-related deaths. Case scenarios are presented to highlight the certification issues that arise with deaths related to diabetes mellitus. This area of death certification may benefit from a consensus effort to standardize and enhance certification and coding of deaths due to diabetes in order to improve the reliability of these mortality statistics.

Implications of Death Certification on Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) Research

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of death in individuals with chronic, uncontrolled epilepsy. Epidemiologists use information on death certificates to study SUDEP. Certification of seizure-related deaths varies. Multiple classification schemes have been proposed to categorize SUDEP type deaths. Nashef et al. recently proposed categorizing death into Definite SUDEP, Definite SUDEP Plus, Probable SUDEP, Possible SUDEP, Near-SUDEP, and Not SUDEP. This study analyzes certification of seizure-related deaths by our office and considers how it relates to Nashef's classifications. Investigative reports from 2011-2015 from the archives of the Jefferson County Coroner/Medical Examiner's Office were searched for the terms "seizure(s)" and "epilepsy." Cases (N=61) were categorized as Definite SUDEP (n=13), Definite SUDEP Plus (n=12), Probable SUDEP (n=1), Possible SUDEP (n=2), and Not SUDEP (n=33). The term SUDEP was only used in one case of Definite SUDEP. The other 12 cases were certified with variations of terms "seizure" and "epilepsy." Cases categorized as Definite SUDEP Plus were overwhelmingly certified as deaths due to heart disease. Categories Probable SUDEP or Possible SUDEP comprised three cases, and in one of those a seizure-related term was used on the death certificate. Thirty-three cases were classified as Not SUDEP. The finding that the majority of cases of Definite SUDEP were certified as some variation of "seizure" or "epilepsy" but not "SUDEP" has important implications for SUDEP research. Our study also suggests that cases of Definite SUDEP Plus would be difficult for epidemiologists to identify because cardiovascular diseases are more frequently implicated.

Principles and Pitfalls: a Guide to Death Certification

Death certificates serve the critical functions of providing documentation for legal/administrative purposes and vital statistics for epidemiologic/health policy purposes. In order to satisfy these functions, it is important that death certificates be filled out completely, accurately, and promptly. The high error rate in death certification has been documented in multiple prior studies, as has the effectiveness of educational training interventions at mitigating errors. The following guide to death certification is intended to illustrate some basic principles and common pitfalls in electronic death registration with the goal of improving death certification accuracy.

Adverse medical complications: an under-reported contributory cause of death in New York City

OBJECTIVES

The current death certification system in the USA fails to accurately track deaths due to adverse medical events. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the under-reporting of deaths due to adverse medical events due to limitations in the current death certification/reporting system, and the benefits of using the term 'therapeutic complication' as the manner of death.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review and comparison of death certificates and vital statistical coding.

METHODS

The manner of death is certified as a therapeutic complication when death is caused by predictable complications of appropriate therapy, and would not have occurred but for the medical intervention. Based on medical examiner records, complications that caused or contributed to deaths over a five-year period were examined retrospectively. These fatalities were compared with deaths coded as medical and surgical complications by the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics.

RESULTS

The Medical Examiner's Office certified 2471 deaths as therapeutic complications and 312 deaths as accidents occurring in healthcare facilities. In contrast, the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics reported 188 deaths due to complications of medical and surgical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the term 'therapeutic complication' as the manner of death identified nearly 14 times more deaths than were reported by the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics. If these therapeutic complications and medical accidents were considered as a 'disease', they would rank as the 10th leading cause of death in New York City, surpassing homicides and suicides in some years. Nationwide policy shifts that use the term 'therapeutic complication' would improve the capture and reporting of these deaths, thus allowing better identification of fatal adverse medical events in order to focus on and assess preventative strategies.

Atrial fibrillation as a cause of death increased steeply in England between 1995 and 2010

AIMS

To report trends in mortality rates for atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), using all the certified causes of death mentioned on death certificates (conventionally known as 'mentions') as well as the underlying cause of death, in the national population of England (1995-2010) and in a regional population with longer coverage of all-mentions mortality (1979-2010).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Analysis of death registration data in England and in the Oxford record linkage study. In England between 1995 and 2010, AF was mentioned as a cause of death (either as an underlying cause or as a contributory cause) in 192 770 registered deaths in people aged 45 years of age and over (representing 0.254% of all registered deaths in this age group). Atrial fibrillation was given as the underlying cause of death in 21.4% of all deaths in which it was mentioned (41 298 of 192 770). In England, age-standardized death rates for mentions of AF increased almost three-fold between 1995 and 2010, from 202.5 deaths per million (1995) to 554.1 deaths per million (2010), with an average annual percentage change of 6.6% (95% confidence interval: 6.3, 7.0). Mortality rates for AF did not increase substantially until the mid-1990s: rates in Oxford were 145.4 deaths per million in 1979, 178.1 in 1995, and 505.1 in 2010.

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation has become much more common as a certified cause of death. The reasons for this are likely to be multifactorial, with changes in demographics, lifestyle, advances in therapeutics, and altered perception of the importance of the condition by certifying doctors all likely to be contributing factors.

Death certification practice in Qatar

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the knowledge and practice of death certification among physicians in Qatar.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Knowledge and practice of death certification were assessed in a group of 317 physicians, selected at random, using a self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

Only 22.7% of physicians had received formal training in death certification. More than 60% of physicians knew which healthcare workers were entitled to complete the cause of death section of the form, and 37% of physicians were aware of the conditions for referral to a forensic physician. The most common difficulties facing physicians, when completing death certification forms, were dealing with complicated cases (47.3%), lack of training (43.5%) and failure to understand the terms used in the form (39.6%). Only 21.5% of physicians identified the cause of death correctly in the case scenario; 53.2% of physicians made major errors and 62.8% made minor errors.

CONCLUSION

Lack of training appears to play a major role in the poor completion of death certification forms. Educational/administrative interventions and training activities are needed.

Assessment of the accuracy of death certification at two referral hospitals

BACKGROUND

Death certification is a vital source of information used in mortality statistics worldwide to assess the health of the general population. This study focuses on the consistency of information between the death reports and the clinical records (files) of deceased patients in two hospitals: the King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH) and King Fahad National Guard hospital (KFNGH) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A random sample of the records of 157 deceased patients' registered in 2002 in the two hospitals was retrospectively reviewed independently to determine the underlying cause of death and compare them with death reports. It was also to check the accuracy of the translation from English in to Arabic.

RESULTS

It was found that the underlying cause of death was misdiagnosed in 80.3% of the death reports. When the two hospitals were compared, no significant difference was observed (p>0.05). In addition, 81.8% of the accurate (correct) death reports in both hospitals were of patients who had died of a malignant disease. However, the translation of the underlying cause of death in KFNGH was correct in 86.1% of the death reports, while in KKUH it was only 25%, which is highly statistically significant (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

With the limitation of studying only a small number of cases, these results indicate a discrepancy between the file and death reports in relation to the cause of death. Also, the translation of the cause of death was inconsistent in the two hospitals. Hence, there is a real need to adopt suitable measures to improve the quality of death certification.