LPA1-mediated inhibition of CXCR4 attenuates CXCL12-induced signaling and cell migration

BACKGROUND

G protein-coupled receptor heteromerization is believed to exert dynamic regulatory impact on signal transduction. CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and its ligand CXCL12, both of which are overexpressed in many cancers, play a pivotal role in metastasis. Likewise, lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPA1) is implicated in cancer cell proliferation and migration. In our preliminary study, we identified LPA1 as a prospective CXCR4 interactor. In the present study, we investigated in detail the formation of the CXCR4-LPA1 heteromer and characterized the unique molecular features and function of this heteromer.

METHODS

We employed bimolecular fluorescence complementation, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, and proximity ligation assays to demonstrate heteromerization between CXCR4 and LPA1. To elucidate the distinctive molecular characteristics and functional implications of the CXCR4-LPA1 heteromer, we performed various assays, including cAMP, BRET for G protein activation, β-arrestin recruitment, ligand binding, and transwell migration assays.

RESULTS

We observed that CXCR4 forms heteromers with LPA1 in recombinant HEK293A cells and the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Coexpression of LPA1 with CXCR4 reduced CXCL12-mediated cAMP inhibition, ERK activation, Gαi/o activation, and β-arrestin recruitment, while CXCL12 binding to CXCR4 remained unaffected. In contrast, CXCR4 had no impact on LPA1-mediated signaling. The addition of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) further hindered CXCL12-induced Gαi/o recruitment to CXCR4. LPA or alkyl-OMPT inhibited CXCL12-induced migration in various cancer cells that endogenously express both CXCR4 and LPA1. Conversely, CXCL12-induced calcium signaling and migration were increased in LPAR1 knockout cells, and LPA1-selective antagonists enhanced CXCL12-induced Gαi/o signaling and cell migration in the parental MDA-MB-231 cells but not in LPA1-deficient cells. Ultimately, complete inhibition of cell migration toward CXCL12 and alkyl-OMPT was only achieved in the presence of both CXCR4 and LPA1 antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and impact of CXCR4-LPA1 heteromers on CXCL12-induced signaling and cell migration have been evidenced across various cell lines. This discovery provides crucial insights into a valuable regulatory mechanism of CXCR4 through heteromerization. Moreover, our findings propose a therapeutic potential in combined CXCR4 and LPA1 inhibitors for cancer and inflammatory diseases associated with these receptors, simultaneously raising concerns about the use of LPA1 antagonists alone for such conditions. Video Abstract.

Biased receptor functionality versus biased agonism in G-protein-coupled receptors

Functional selectivity is a property of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by which activation by different agonists leads to different signal transduction mechanisms. This phenomenon is also known as biased agonism and has attracted the interest of drug discovery programs in both academy and industry. This relatively recent concept has raised concerns as to the validity and real translational value of the results showing bias; firstly biased agonism may vary significantly depending on the cell type and the experimental constraints, secondly the conformational landscape that leads to biased agonism has not been defined. Remarkably, GPCRs may lead to differential signaling even when a single agonist is used. Here we present a concept that constitutes a biochemical property of GPCRs that may be underscored just using one agonist, preferably the endogenous agonist. "Biased receptor functionality" is proposed to describe this effect with examples based on receptor heteromerization and alternative splicing. Examples of regulation of final agonist-induced outputs based on interaction with β-arrestins or calcium sensors are also provided. Each of the functional GPCR units (which are finite in number) has a specific conformation. Binding of agonist to a specific conformation, i.e. GPCR activation, is sensitive to the kinetics of the agonist-receptor interactions. All these players are involved in the contrasting outputs obtained when different agonists are assayed.

Differential effect of amphetamine over the corticotropin-releasing factor CRF2 receptor, the orexin OX1 receptor and the CRF2-OX1 heteroreceptor complex

Stress is one of the factors underlying drug seeking behavior that often goes in parallel with loss of appetite. We here demonstrate that orexin 1 receptors (OX₁R) may form complexes with the corticotropin releasing factor CRF₂ receptor. Two specific features of the heteromer were a cross-antagonism and a blockade by CRF₂ of OX₁R signaling. In cells expressing one of the receptors, agonist-mediated signal transduction mechanisms were potentiated by amphetamine. Sigma 1 (σ₁) and 2 (σ₂) receptors are targets of drugs of abuse and, despite sharing a similar name, the two receptors are structurally unrelated and their physiological role is not known. We here show that σ₁ receptors interact with CRF₂ receptors and that σ₂ receptors interact with OX₁R. Moreover, we show that amphetamine effect on CRF₂ receptors was mediated by σ₁R whereas the effect on OX₁ receptors was mediated by σ₂R. Amphetamine did potentiate the negative cross-talk occurring within the CRF₂-OX₁ receptor heteromer context, likely by a macromolecular complex involving the two sigma receptors and the two GPCRs. Finally, in vivo microdialysis experiments showed that amphetamine potentiated orexin A-induced dopamine and glutamate release in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Remarkably, the in vivo orexin A effects were blocked by a selective CRF₂R antagonist. These results show that amphetamine impacts on the OX₁R-, CRF₂R- and OX₁R/CRF₂R-mediated signaling and that cross-antagonism is instrumental for in vivo detection of GPCR heteromers. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Receptor heteromers and their allosteric receptor-receptor interactions'.

Molecular and functional interaction between GPR18 and cannabinoid CB2 G-protein-coupled receptors. Relevance in neurodegenerative diseases

GPR18, still considered an orphan receptor, may respond to endocannabinoids, whose canonical receptors are CB₁ and CB₂. GPR18 and CB₂ receptors share a role in peripheral immune response regulation and are co-expressed in microglia, which are immunocompetent cells in the central nervous system (CNS). We aimed at identifying heteroreceptor complexes formed by GPR18 and CB₁R or CB₂R in resting and activated microglia. Receptor-receptor interaction was assessed using energy-transfer approaches, and receptor function by determining cAMP levels and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in heterologous cells and primary cultures of microglia. Heteroreceptor identification in primary cultures of microglia was achieved by in situ proximity ligation assays. Energy transfer results showed interaction of GPR18 with CB₂R but not with CB₁R. CB₂-GPR18 heteroreceptor complexes displayed particular functional properties (heteromer prints) often consisting of negative cross-talk (activation of one receptor reduces signaling arising from the partner receptor) and cross-antagonism (the response of one of the receptors is blocked by a selective antagonist of the partner receptor). Activated microglia showed the heteromer print (negative cross-talk and bidirectional cross-antagonism) and increased expression of CB₂R and GPR18. Due to the important role of CB₂R in neuroprotection, we further investigated heteroreceptor occurrence in primary cultures of microglia from transgenic mice overexpressing human APP_Sw,Ind, an Alzheimer's disease model. Microglial cells from transgenic mice showed the heteromer print and functional interactions that were similar to those found in cells from wild-type animals that were activated by treatment with lipopolysaccharide and interferon-γ. Our results suggest that GPR18 and its heteromers may play important roles in neurodegenerative processes.

Receptor-heteromer mediated regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in activated microglia. Role of CB1 and CB2 receptors and relevance for Alzheimer's disease and levodopa-induced dyskinesia

Endocannabinoids are important regulators of neurotransmission and, acting on activated microglia, they are postulated as neuroprotective agents. Endocannabinoid action is mediated by CB₁ and CB₂ receptors, which may form heteromeric complexes (CB₁-CB₂Hets) with unknown function in microglia. We aimed at establishing the expression and signaling properties of cannabinoid receptors in resting and LPS/IFN-γ-activated microglia. In activated microglia mRNA transcripts increased (2 fold for CB₁ and circa 20 fold for CB₂), whereas receptor levels were similar for CB₁ and markedly upregulated for CB₂; CB₁-CB₂Hets were also upregulated. Unlike in resting cells, CB₂ receptors became robustly coupled to G_i in activated cells, in which CB₁-CB₂Hets mediated a potentiation effect. Hence, resting cells were refractory while activated cells were highly responsive to cannabinoids. Interestingly, similar results were obtained in cultures treated with ß-amyloid (Aß_1-42). Microglial activation markers were detected in the striatum of a Parkinson's disease (PD) model and, remarkably, in primary microglia cultures from the hippocampus of mutant β-amyloid precursor protein (APP_Sw,Ind) mice, a transgenic Alzheimer's disease (AD) model. Also of note was the similar cannabinoid receptor signaling found in primary cultures of microglia from APP_Sw,Ind and in cells from control animals activated using LPS plus IFN-γ. Expression of CB₁-CB₂Hets was increased in the striatum from rats rendered dyskinetic by chronic levodopa treatment. In summary, our results showed sensitivity of activated microglial cells to cannabinoids, increased CB₁-CB₂Het expression in activated microglia and in microglia from the hippocampus of an AD model, and a correlation between levodopa-induced dyskinesia and striatal microglial activation in a PD model. Cannabinoid receptors and the CB₁-CB₂ heteroreceptor complex in activated microglia have potential as targets in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

FFAR2-FFAR3 receptor heteromerization modulates short-chain fatty acid sensing

Free fatty acid receptors 2 and 3 (FFAR2/FFA2/GPR43 and FFAR3/FFA3/GPR41) are mammalian receptors for gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). These receptors are promising drug targets for obesity, colitis, colon cancer, asthma, and arthritis. Here, we demonstrate that FFAR2 and FFAR3 interact to form a heteromer in primary human monocytes and macrophages via proximity ligation assay, and during heterologous expression in HEK293 cells via bimolecular fluorescence complementation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The FFAR2-FFAR3 heteromer displayed enhanced cytosolic Ca²⁺ signaling (1.5-fold increase relative to homomeric FFAR2) and β-arrestin-2 recruitment (30-fold increase relative to homomeric FFAR3). The enhanced heteromer signaling was attenuated by FFAR2 antagonism (CATPB), G_αq inhibition (YM254890), or G_αi inhibition (pertussis toxin). Unlike homomeric FFAR2/3, the heteromer lacked the ability to inhibit cAMP production but gained the ability to induce p38 phosphorylation in HEK293 and inflammatory monocytes via a CATPB- and YM254890-sensitive mechanism. Our data, taken together, reveal that FFAR2 and FFAR3 may interact to form a receptor heteromer with signaling that is distinct from the parent homomers-a novel pathway for drug targeting.-Ang, Z., Xiong, D., Wu, M., Ding, J. L. FFAR2-FFAR3 receptor heteromerization modulates short-chain fatty acid sensing.

Purinergic signaling in Parkinson's disease. Relevance for treatment

Purinergic signaling modulates dopaminergic neurotransmission in health and disease. Classically adenosine A1 and A2A receptors have been considered key for the fine tune control of dopamine actions in the striatum, the main CNS motor control center. The main adenosine signaling mechanism is via the cAMP pathway but the future will tell whether calcium signaling is relevant in adenosinergic control of striatal function. Very relevant is the recent approval in Japan of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, istradefylline, for use in Parkinson's disease patients. Purine nucleotides are also regulators of striatal dopamine neurotransmission via P2 purinergic receptors. In parallel to the alpha-synuclein hypothesis of Parkinson's disease etiology, purinergic P2X1 receptors have been identified as mediators of accumulation of the Lewy-body enriched protein alpha-synuclein. Of note is the expression in striatum of purinergic-receptor-containing heteromers that are potential targets of anti-Parkinson's disease therapies and should be taken into account in drug discovery programs. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Purines in Neurodegeneration and Neuroregeneration'.

Orexin-corticotropin-releasing factor receptor heteromers in the ventral tegmental area as targets for cocaine

Release of the neuropeptides corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and orexin-A in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) play an important role in stress-induced cocaine-seeking behavior. We provide evidence for pharmacologically significant interactions between CRF and orexin-A that depend on oligomerization of CRF1 receptor (CRF1R) and orexin OX1 receptors (OX1R). CRF1R-OX1R heteromers are the conduits of a negative crosstalk between orexin-A and CRF as demonstrated in transfected cells and rat VTA, in which they significantly modulate dendritic dopamine release. The cocaine target σ1 receptor (σ1R) also associates with the CRF1R-OX1R heteromer. Cocaine binding to the σ1R-CRF1R-OX1R complex promotes a long-term disruption of the orexin-A-CRF negative crosstalk. Through this mechanism, cocaine sensitizes VTA cells to the excitatory effects of both CRF and orexin-A, thus providing a mechanism by which stress induces cocaine seeking.

G-protein-coupled receptor heteromers as key players in the molecular architecture of the central nervous system

The overall architecture of the nervous system, especially the CNS, is remarkable. The anatomy of the nervous system is constituted not only by macroscopic and microscopy identifiable regions and neuronal cell types, but also by protein complexes whose identification and localization require sophisticated techniques. G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute an example of proteins that are the key factors in the framework needed to sustain brain and nerve structure and function. The versatility underlying nervous system anatomy takes advantage of a recently discovered feature of GPCRs, the possibility to form heteromers that, placed at specific neuronal subsets and at specific locations (pre-, post-, or peri-synaptic), contribute to attain unique neural functions.