Follow-Up of Microscopic Colitis Patients and Diarrhea Controls at 1 Year

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Microscopic colitis (MC) is a common cause of chronic diarrhea; however, the clinical course of this disease is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate how patients diagnosed with MC were treated in routine clinical practice and how their symptoms compared to patients with other causes of chronic diarrhea at one year follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study of patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy to evaluate diarrhea. The study pathologist determined whether patients were classified as MC cases or non-MC controls. One year after colonoscopy, we interviewed cases (n = 74) and controls (n = 162) about their diagnosis, medications for diarrhea, and symptom burden.

RESULTS

At 1-year follow-up after colonoscopy, 10% of MC cases were unaware of the diagnosis, 60% had been prescribed a medication for diarrhea, 40% had fecal urgency, 32% had weight loss, and 21% had fecal incontinence. Among cases, 46% were treated with budesonide. Compared to cases, controls had worse symptoms based on the Microscopic Colitis Disease Activity Index score with a median score of 3.0 (interquartile range 1.9-4.2) vs 2.3 (interquartile range 1.4-3.2) at 1-year follow-up. Controls had more frequent stools, urgency, fecal incontinence, and abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of patients with biopsy-confirmed MC and diarrhea controls, we found that some cases remained unaware of their diagnosis, many cases had persistent symptoms, and controls had worse symptoms than cases. These findings suggest there are opportunities to improve management of this chronic disease.

Bile Acid Sequestrants in Microscopic Colitis: Clinical Outcomes and Utility of Bile Acid Testing

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) may be a treatment in microscopic colitis (MC), but efficacy data are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of BAS in MC and assessed the utility of bile acid testing to predict response.

METHODS

Adults with MC treated with BAS (2010-2020) at Mayo Clinic were identified. Bile acid malabsorption was defined by elevated serum 7⍺-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one or by fecal testing using previously validated cutoffs. Response was defined at 12 ± 4 weeks after BAS initiation as: complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in diarrhea), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinuation due to side effects). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of response to BAS.

RESULTS

We identified 282 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 20-87 years]; 88.3% women) with median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 0.4-9.1 years). Patients were treated with the following BAS: 64.9% cholestyramine, 21.6% colesevelam, and 13.5% colestipol. Clinical outcomes were: 49.3% complete response, 16.3% partial response, 24.8% nonresponse, and 9.6% intolerance. There were no differences in outcomes between those on BAS alone or BAS combined with other medications (P = .98). The dose of BAS was not associated with response (P = .51). Bile acid testing was done in 31.9% of patients, and 56.7% were positive. No predictors of response to BAS were identified. After BAS discontinuation, 41.6% had recurrence at a median of 21 weeks (range, 1-172 weeks).

CONCLUSION

In one of the largest cohorts evaluating BAS treatment in MC, nearly two-thirds had a partial or complete response. Additional research is needed to determine the role of BAS and bile acid malabsorption in MC.

Appendectomy and Future Risk of Microscopic Colitis: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Sweden

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory bowel disease and a common cause of chronic diarrhea. Appendectomy has been suggested to have immunomodulating effects in the colon, influencing the risk of gastrointestinal disease. The relationship between appendectomy and MC has only been sparsely studied.

METHODS

This was a case-control study based on the nationwide ESPRESSO (Epidemiology Strengthened by histoPathology Reports in Sweden) cohort, consisting of histopathological examinations in Sweden, linked to national registers. Patients with MC were matched to population controls by age, sex, calendar year of biopsy, and county of residence. Data on antecedent appendectomy and comorbidities were retrieved from the Patient Register. Unconditional logistic regression models were conducted presenting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for country of birth and matching factors. Further subanalyses were made based on MC subtypes (lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis), follow-up time postappendectomy and severity of appendicitis.

RESULTS

The study included 14,520 cases of MC and 69,491 controls, among these 7.6% (n = 1103) and 5.1% (n = 3510), respectively, had a previous appendectomy ≥1 year prior to MC or matching date. Patients with a previous appendectomy had an increased risk of MC in total (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.40-1.61) and per the collagenous colitis subtype (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.48-1.88) or lymphocytic colitis subtype (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.30-1.55). The risk remained elevated throughout follow-up, and the highest risk was observed in noncomplicated appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide case-control study found a modestly increased risk of developing MC following appendectomy.

The Epidemiology of Microscopic Colitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Population-Based Study From 2011 to 2019

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Epidemiologic studies from Europe and North America have reported an increasing incidence of microscopic colitis (MC) in the late 20th century, followed by a plateau. This population-based study assessed recent incidence trends and the overall prevalence of MC over the past decade.

METHODS

Residents of Olmsted County, MN, diagnosed with collagenous colitis (CC) or lymphocytic colitis (LC) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019 were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Clinical variables were abstracted by chart review. Incidence rates were age- and sex-adjusted to the 2010 US population. Associations between incidence and age, sex, and calendar periods were evaluated using Poisson regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 268 incident cases of MC were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years (range, 19-90 y); 207 (77%) were women. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of MC was 25.8 (95% CI, 22.7-28.9) cases per 100,000 person-years. The incidence of LC was 15.8 (95% CI, 13.4-18.2) and CC was 9.9 (95% CI, 8.1-11.9) per 100,000 person-years. A higher MC incidence was associated with increasing age and female sex (P < .01). There was no significant trend in age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate over the study period (P = .92). On December 31, 2019, the prevalence of MC, LC, and CC (including cases diagnosed before 2011) was 246.2, 146.1, and 100.1 per 100,000 persons, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of MC and its subtypes was stable between 2011 and 2019, but its prevalence was higher than in previous periods. The incidence of MC continues to be associated with increasing age and female sex.

Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy in Patients With Symptoms Compatible With Rome IV Functional Bowel Disorders

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is little data on the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients with symptoms compatible with functional bowel disorders (FBDs). Previous studies have only focused on diagnostic outcomes of colonoscopy in those with suspected irritable bowel syndrome using historic Rome I-III criteria, whilst having partially assessed for alarm features and shown markedly conflicting results. There is also no colonoscopy outcome data for other FBDs, such as functional constipation or functional diarrhea. Using the contemporaneous Rome IV criteria we determined the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients with symptoms compatible with a FBD, stratified diligently according to the presence or absence of alarm features.

METHODS

Basic demographics, alarm features, and bowel symptoms using the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire were collected prospectively from adults attending out-patient colonoscopy in 2019. Endoscopists were blinded to the questionnaire data. Organic disease was defined as the presence of inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, or microscopic colitis.

RESULTS

646 patients fulfilled symptom-based criteria for the following Rome IV FBDs: IBS (56%), functional diarrhea (27%) and functional constipation (17%). Almost all had alarm features (98%). The combined prevalence of organic disease was 12%, being lowest for functional constipation and IBS-constipation (∼6% each), followed by IBS-mixed (∼9%), and highest amongst functional diarrhea and IBS-diarrhea (∼17% each); p = .005. The increased prevalence of organic disease in diarrheal versus constipation disorders was accounted for by microscopic colitis (5.7% vs. 0%, p < .001) but not inflammatory bowel disease (7.2% vs. 4.0%, p = .2) or colorectal cancer (4.2% vs. 2.3%, p = .2). However, 1-in-4 chronic diarrhea patients - conceivably at risk for microscopic colitis - did not have colonic biopsies taken. Finally, only 11 of 646 (2%) patients were without alarm features, in whom colonoscopy was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with symptoms of FBDs who are referred for colonoscopy have alarm features. The presence of organic disease is significantly higher in diarrheal versus constipation disorders, with microscopic colitis largely accounting for the difference whilst also being a missed diagnostic opportunity. In those patients without alarm features, the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy was nil.

Transcriptomic Profiling of Collagenous Colitis Identifies Hallmarks of Nondestructive Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The pathophysiology of the inflammatory bowel disease collagenous colitis (CC) is poorly described. Our aim was to use RNA sequencing of mucosal samples from patients with active CC, CC in remission, refractory CC, ulcerative colitis (UC), and control subjects to gain insight into CC pathophysiology, identify genetic signatures linked to CC, and uncover potentially druggable disease pathways.

METHODS

We performed whole transcriptome sequencing of CC samples from patients before and during treatment with the corticosteroid drug budesonide, CC steroid-refractory patients, UC patients, and healthy control subjects (n = 9-13). Bulk mucosa and laser-captured microdissected intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) gene expression were analyzed by gene set enrichment and gene set variation analyses to identify significant pathways and cells, respectively, altered in CC. Leading genes and cells were validated using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We identified an activation of the adaptive immune response to bacteria and viruses in active CC that could be mediated by dendritic cells. Moreover, IECs display hyperproliferation and increased antigen presentation in active CC. Further analysis revealed that genes related to the immune response (DUOX2, PLA2G2A, CXCL9), DNA transcription (CTR9), protein processing (JOSD1, URI1), and ion transport (SLC9A3) remained dysregulated even after budesonide-induced remission. Budesonide-refractory CC patients fail to restore normal gene expression, and displayed a transcriptomic profile close to UC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the implication of innate and adaptive immune responses in CC, governed by IECs and dendritic cells, respectively, and identified ongoing epithelial damage. Refractory CC could share pathomechanisms with UC.

Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.

METHODS

Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.

The epidemiology of microscopic colitis in Olmsted County from 2002 to 2010: a population-based study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The increasing incidence of microscopic colitis has been partly attributed to detection bias. We aimed to ascertain recent incidence trends and the overall prevalence of microscopic colitis in a population-based study.

METHODS

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we identified residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were diagnosed with collagenous colitis or lymphocytic colitis from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2010, based on biopsy results and the presence of diarrhea (N = 182; mean age at diagnosis, 65.8 years; 76.4% women). Poisson regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between incidence and age, sex, and calendar period.

RESULTS

The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of microscopic colitis was 21.0 cases per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0-24.1 cases per 100,000 person-years). The incidence of lymphocytic colitis was 12.0 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI, 9.6-14.3 per 100,000 person-years) and collagenous colitis was 9.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI, 7.0-11.1 per 100,000 person-years). The incidence of microscopic colitis and its subtypes remained stable over the study period (P = .63). Increasing age (P < .001) and female sex (P < .001) were associated with increasing incidence. On December 31, 2010, the prevalence of microscopic colitis was 219 cases per 100,000 persons (90.4 per 100,000 persons for collagenous colitis and 128.6 per 100,000 persons for lymphocytic colitis).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of microscopic colitis in Olmsted County residents has stabilized and remains associated with female sex and increasing age.

Budesonide is more effective than mesalamine or placebo in short-term treatment of collagenous colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies reporting that budesonide is effective for the treatment of collagenous colitis have been small and differed in efficacy measures. Mesalamine has been proposed as a treatment option for collagenous colitis, although its efficacy has never been investigated in placebo-controlled trials. We performed a phase 3, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalamine as short-term treatments for collagenous colitis.

METHODS

Patients with active collagenous colitis were randomly assigned to groups given pH-modified release oral budesonide capsules (9 mg budesonide once daily, Budenofalk, n = 30), mesalamine granules (3 g mesalamine once daily, Salofalk, n = 25), or placebo for 8 weeks (n = 37) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion. The study was conducted in 31 centers (hospital clinics and private practices) in Germany, Denmark, Lithuania, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The primary end point was clinical remission at 8 weeks defined as ≤ 3 stools per day. Secondary end points included clinical remission at 8 weeks, according to the Hjortswang-Criteria of disease activity, taking stool consistency into account.

RESULTS

A greater percentage of patients in the budesonide group were in clinical remission at week 8 than the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 80.0% vs 59.5%; P = .072; per-protocol analysis, 84.8% vs 60.6%; P = .046). Based on the Hjortswang-Criteria, 80.0% of patients given budesonide achieved clinical remission compared with 37.8% of patients given placebo (P = .0006); 44.0% of patients given mesalamine achieved clinical remission, but budesonide was superior to mesalamine (P = .0035). Budesonide significantly improved stool consistency and mucosal histology, and alleviated abdominal pain. The rate of adverse events did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral budesonide (9 mg once daily) is effective and safe for short-term treatment of collagenous colitis. Short-term treatment with oral mesalamine (3 g once daily) appears to be ineffective. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00450086.