Postprandial triglycerides across the aging spectrum: A secondary analysis utilizing an abbreviated fat tolerance test

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Elevated postprandial triglycerides are an independent cardiovascular disease risk factor and observed in older adults. However, differences in postprandial triglycerides across the spectrum of adulthood remain unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a secondary analysis of six studies where adults (aged 18-84 years; N = 155) completed an abbreviated fat tolerance test (9 kcal/kg; 70% fat). Differences in postprandial triglycerides were compared in those ≥50 and <50 years and by decade of life, adjusting for sex and BMI. Compared to those <50 years, participants ≥50 years had higher fasting, 4 h, and Δ triglycerides from baseline (p's < 0.05). When examining triglyceride parameters by decade, no differences were observed for fasting triglycerides, but 50 s, 60 s, and 70s-80 s displayed greater 4 h and Δ triglycerides versus 20 s (p's ≤ 0.001). The frequency of adverse postprandial triglyceride responses (i.e., ≥220 mg/dL) was higher in participants ≥50 versus <50 years (p < 0.01), and in 60 s compared to all other decades (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Older age was generally associated with higher postprandial triglycerides, with no divergence across the spectrum of older adulthood. In our sample, postprandial triglyceride differences in older and younger adults were driven by those >50 years relative to young adults in their 20 s.

REGISTRATION

N/A (secondary analysis).

Postprandial triglycerides, endothelial function, and inflammatory cytokines as potential candidates for early risk detection in normal-weight obesity

PROBLEM

Normal-weight obesity (NWO) is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, NWO's clinical presentation is often unremarkable based on common risk factors. We examined whether CVD risk factors not routinely measured clinically including postprandial triglycerides, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and inflammatory cytokines would be abnormal in NWO, consistent with their future risk.

METHODS

Individuals were recruited into 3 groups (n = 10/ group): controls (Con), NWO, and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Con was defined as a normal body mass index (BMI), < 25% (M) or < 35% (F) body fat, and < 1 International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. NWO were above this body fat cutoff while maintaining a normal BMI and MetS was defined per the IDF. Participants underwent an abbreviated fat tolerance test (i.e., difference in fasting and 4 h triglycerides following a high-fat meal [9 kcal/kg; 73% fat)] and fasting and postprandial lipid and glucose metrics, as well as FMD were measured. A T cell cytokine bioplex was also performed using fasting serum.

RESULTS

NWO and MetS had similar body fat% and both were higher than Con (p < 0.0001). Despite having similar fasting triglycerides to Con, NWO had 4-hour triglycerides 66% greater than Con, but 46% lower than MetS (p < 0.01). FMD decreased in all groups after the high-fat meal (p < 0.0001). MetS displayed lower fasting FMD than Con, and NWO was similar to both groups (p < 0.05). No group differences were observed with postprandial FMD and the majority of fasting cytokines assessed. However, MetS exhibited higher fasting TNF-α than Con (p < 0.05), and NWO was similar to both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, NWO was associated with higher postprandial triglycerides than Con, but displayed little evidence of impaired vascular health or inflammation.

Adipose tissue expression of UCP1 and PRDM16 genes and their association with postprandial triglyceride metabolism and glucose intolerance

AIMS

UCP1 and PRDM16 genes, primarily involved in browning of adipose tissue that can affect lipid metabolism are also associated with diabetes risk. Therefore, we planned to study the adipose tissue expression of UCP1 and PRDM 16 genes in subjects with glucose intolerance to find out its association with postprandial triglyceride (PPTg) measures and T2DM.

METHODS

A total of 30 subjects were recruited in three groups i.e., NGT, prediabetes and T2DM (NDDM + known T2DM) who were matched for age, sex and BMI. An 8-hour standardized fat challenge test was performed to study lipemic responses. UCP1 and PRDM16 genes quantification in adipose tissue was performed by real-time PCR followed by SDS PAGE.

RESULTS

UCP1 gene expression in SAT was significantly lower in T2DM and prediabetes as compared to NGT group while PRDM16 gene expression was significantly lower in T2DM group as compared to NGT group. UCP1 gene expression correlated with PPTg measures as well as with glycaemic measures while PRDM16 gene expression correlated with glycaemic measures only.

CONCLUSION

This study found downregulation of PRDM16 and UCP1 gene expression in SAT in subjects with glucose intolerance. The association of UCP1 gene expression with PPTg dysmetabolism may contribute to greater predisposition to T2DM.

Fasting, non-fasting and postprandial triglycerides for screening cardiometabolic risk

Fasting triacylglycerols have long been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other cardiometabolic conditions. Evidence suggests that non-fasting triglycerides (i.e. measured within 8 h of eating) better predict CVD than fasting triglycerides, which has led several organisations to recommend non-fasting lipid panels as the new clinical standard. However, unstandardised assessment protocols associated with non-fasting triglyceride measurement may lead to misclassification, with at-risk individuals being overlooked. A third type of triglyceride assessment, postprandial testing, is more controlled, yet historically has been difficult to implement due to the time and effort required to execute it. Here, we review differences in assessment, the underlying physiology and the pathophysiological relevance of elevated fasting, non-fasting and postprandial triglycerides. We also present data suggesting that there may be a distinct advantage of postprandial triglycerides, even over non-fasting triglycerides, for early detection of CVD risk and offer suggestions to make postprandial protocols more clinically feasible.

The acute effects of dietary carbohydrate reduction on postprandial responses of non-esterified fatty acids and triglycerides: a randomized trial

Background

Postprandial non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) and triglyceride (TG) responses are increased in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and may impair insulin action and increase risk of cardiovascular disease and death. Dietary carbohydrate reduction has been suggested as non-pharmacological therapy for T2DM, but the acute effects on NEFA and TG during subsequent meals remain to be investigated.

Methods

Postprandial NEFA and TG responses were assessed in subjects with T2DM by comparing a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein (CRHP) diet with a conventional diabetes (CD) diet in an open-label, randomized, cross-over study. Each diet was consumed on two consecutive days, separated by a wash-out period. The iso-caloric CRHP/CD diets contained 31/54 E% from carbohydrate, 29/16 E% energy from protein and 40/30 E% from fat, respectively. Sixteen subjects with well-controlled T2DM (median HbA_1c 47 mmol/mol, (37–67 mmol/mol) and BMI 30 ± 4.4 kg/m²) participated in the study. NEFA and TG were evaluated following breakfast and lunch.

Results

NEFA net area under curve (AUC) was increased by 97 ± 38 μmol/Lx270 min (p = 0.024) after breakfast but reduced by 141 ± 33 μmol/Lx180 min (p < 0.001) after lunch on the CRHP compared with CD diet. Likewise, TG net AUC was increased by 80 ± 28 μmol/Lx270 min (p = 0.012) after breakfast but reduced by 320 ± 60 μmol/Lx180 min (p < 0.001) after lunch on the CRHP compared with CD diet.

Conclusions

In well-controlled T2DM a modest reduction of dietary carbohydrate with a corresponding increase in protein and fat acutely reduced postprandial serum NEFA suppression and increased serum TG responses after a breakfast meal but had the opposite effect after a lunch meal. The mechanism behind this second-meal phenomenon of CRHP diet on important risk factors for aggravating T2DM and cardiovascular disease awaits further investigation.

Trial registration

The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02472951. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02472951. Registered June 16, 2015.

Leptin to adiponectin ratio - A surrogate biomarker for early detection of metabolic disturbances in obesity

AIM

To study if the leptin to adiponectin (L:A) ratio, can be a potential biomarker for postprandial triglyceride clearance, insulin resistance (IR) or leptin resistance (LR) in apparently healthy obese, and obese individuals with established metabolic disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty adult subjects with obesity (BMI ≥30); of which 36 metabolic healthy obese (MHO), and 14 metabolic dysregulated obese (MDO), with clinical and/or biochemical signs of metabolic disease were included. Seventeen healthy, normal weight subjects represented the control group. Postprandial triglyceride (TG) levels were measured in an 8 h oral fat tolerance test (OFTT). IR by HOMA-IR, L:A ratio and indirect LR were measured. In the MHO group, 71.4%, 69.4% and 86.1%, had delayed TG clearance, IR and LR, respectively; whereas in the MDO group this was detected in 85.7%, 71.4% and 91.7%, respectively. A combination of all three metabolic risk factors was found in 39.8% of the MHO and in 42.9% of the MDO patients. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed that a cut-off value for the L:A ratio of >1.65 for the control group (PPV 1.0, NPV 0.91) and >3.65 for the obese subjects (PPV 0.86, NPV 0.48) predicted the delayed TG clearance with a good specificity and sensitivity. Detecting a combined risk with at least 2/3 metabolic risk factors, the ROC yielded the most suitable L:A ratio cut-off at >1.88.

CONCLUSION

L:A ratio was able to detect early metabolic disturbances in obese individuals, and may be a potential useful clinical surrogate biomarker of metabolic disorders.

Identification of a threshold to discriminate fasting hypertriglyceridemia with postprandial values

BACKGROUND

Postprandial lipemia is an important cardiovascular risk factor. The assessment of postprandial lipid metabolism is a newly trend that several consortiums and countries have adopted. The aim of the study is to determine a postprandial triglyceride concentration cut-off point that accurately discriminate individuals with fasting normal triglyceride concentrations from those with fasting hypertriglyceridemia.

METHODS

Cross sectional population-based study. A total of 212 subjects underwent an eight hours' oral fat tolerance test. Samples were taken fasting, three, four, five, six and eight hours after the meal. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c-statistic) was computed using postprandial triglycerides concentrations as independent predictor, and fasting hypertriglyceridemia as dependent variable.

RESULTS

The best threshold of postprandial lipemia to discriminate fasting hypertriglyceridemia was 280 mg/dL at any hour area under the curve 0.816 (95% confidence interval 0.753-0.866), bootstrap-corrected c-statistic = 0.733 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.86). The same value was compared with apolipoprotein B concentrations (>90th percentile) having a good performance: area under the curve 0.687 95% confidence interval 0.624-0.751). Likewise, subjects with high postprandial lipemia have higher Globo risk scores.

CONCLUSION

The 280 mg/dL cut-off point value of postprandial triglycerides concentration any time after a test meal discriminate subjects with fasting hypertriglyceridemia. This threshold has a good performance in a heterogeneous population and has a good concordance with cardiovascular risk surrogates.

Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass on Postprandial Lipid Profile in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery (BS) is known to favorably impact fasting lipid profile. Fasting and postprandial lipids were evaluated before and 2 years after BS in obese type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in 19 obese T2DM patients: ten undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and nine undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Before and 2 years after BS, clinical parameters and the response of lipid and incretin hormones to a mixed meal (MM) were assessed.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar characteristics at baseline. After BS, weight loss was similar in the two groups (p ≤ 0.01). Fasting glucose, insulin, and triglycerides decreased while HDL cholesterol increased in a similar way (p < 0.05); in contrast, fasting LDL cholesterol decreased only after RYGB (p < 0.05). Post-meal glucose concentrations decreased while early insulin response significantly improved after both procedures (p < 0.001 for both). Postprandial triglycerides decreased after both procedures (p < 0.05) while postprandial LDL cholesterol decreased only after RYGB (p < 0.05). Meal-GLP-1 increased postoperatively in both groups although to a greater extent after RYGB (p < 0.001 vs. SG). GIP decreased after both procedures, especially after RYGB (p = 0.003). At multivariate analysis, GLP-1 peak was the best predictor of LDL reduction (β = -0.552, p = 0.039) while the improvement of HOMA-IR (β = 0.574, p = 0.014) and weight loss (β = 0.418, p = 0.036) predicted triglycerides reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical procedures markedly reduce fasting and postprandial triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol levels. LDL cholesterol decreases only after RYGB through a mechanism likely mediated by the restoration of GLP-1.

Postprandial triglyceride responses and endothelial function in prediabetic first-degree relatives of patients with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Only a few studies have reported on postprandial lipid responses and endothelial function in prediabetic subjects. None of the study has compared role of familial predisposition in determining postprandial endothelial dysfunction and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in subjects with prediabetes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to study the postprandial triglyceride (PPTG) responses and endothelial function in prediabetic first-degree relatives of patients with diabetes.

METHODS

Thirty-nine subjects were recruited on the basis of oral glucose tolerance test into 3 groups: group 1, prediabetic subjects who had a first-degree relative with diabetes; group 2, prediabetic subjects without family history of diabetes; and group 3, normal glucose tolerance subjects without family history of diabetes. Oral fat challenge test was performed in all study subjects and PPTG responses were measured up to 8 hours. Postprandial endothelial function after 4 hours of fat challenge was estimated by flow-mediated dilation.

RESULTS

Postprandial endothelial dysfunction was greatest in group 1 and significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (P < .001) and group 2 compared with group 3 (P < .001). PPTG responses (TG-AUC, TG-peak, TG-6 hour, and TG-8 hour) were significantly higher in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3. However, they were similar between groups 2 and 3. Endothelial function showed significant negative correlation with TG-6 hour and TG-8 hour.

CONCLUSION

Prediabetic subjects respond to fat challenge with a greater degree of TG response and endothelial dysfunction compared with normal glucose tolerance subjects especially if they have a first-degree relative with diabetes. This may contribute to enhanced cardiovascular risk reported in prediabetic individuals.