Clinical efficacy and safety of astragalus injection combined with ACEI/ARB in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease is a common complication of diabetes and the main cause of end-stage renal disease. Astragalus (Huangqi) injection in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs) have been widely used for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in China. However, no supporting evidence yet exists with regard to the safety and effectiveness of this approach. Here a protocol is outlined for use in systematic evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of astragalus injection combined with ACEI/ARB for the treatment of DKD.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials will be retrieved from 8 scientific databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE database, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database and China Science Journal Database. Ongoing clinical trial databases will also be searched for studies published from the time of establishment of each database to September 1, 2022. that will include the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Centre (www.chictr.org.cn/), the World Health Organisation International Trial Registration Platform (https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform), Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/), Baidu Scholar (https://xueshu.baidu.com), etc. The main outcome indicators included urinary albumin excretion rate or 24-hour urinary albumin excretion rate, and renal function (blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine concentration). The secondary outcome indicators mainly include the following 4 aspects: blood sugar, blood pressure, blood lipid levels and adverse events. Two researchers will independently select and extract data from randomized controlled trials and determine risks of bias. Meta-analysis will be performed using Revman5.4 then the quality of evidence from randomized clinical trials will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) System tool.

RESULTS

This review will be the first to summarize meta-analysis results regarding the efficacy and safety of Huangqi injection combined with ACEI/ARB when administered during any stage of diabetic nephropathy rather than during only a single stage of the disease.

DISCUSSION

It will provide high-quality guidance for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease and provide patients with more treatment options.

The angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor, LCZ696, in heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

LCZ696 is a novel neuroendocrine inhibitor that has been widely used in heart failure (HF). However, its advantage over other neuroendocrine inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to provide the latest evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 as compared to other ACEis and ARBs with regards to the treatment of HF.

METHODS

We systematically searched databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcome measures included all-cause mortality, rate of hospitalizations for HF, rate of death from cardiovascular causes, change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and decline of renal function.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 19,078 patients were identified. The meta-analysis indicated that LCZ696 was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.93; P = .0005), rate of hospitalizations for HF (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87; P < .00001), reduction in NT-proBNP levels (rate ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88; P < .0001), and decline in renal function (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88; P < .0001) compared with ACEis and ARBs. However, there was no statistical difference in the rate of death from cardiovascular causes (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.03; P = .09) between LCZ696 and ACEis and ARBs.

CONCLUSION

LCZ696 is superior to ACEis and ARBs in the treatment of HF. Hence, it should be more widely used clinically.

Assessment of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker on the split renal function in the patients with primary hypertension

Bilateral kidney damage in hypertensive patients is not parallel. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB), as a commonly used antihypertensive drug, could protect kidney function and delay its deterioration. Most studies focused on overall renal function, but the researches on split renal function (SRF) are rare. We investigated the effects of ACEI/ARB on the SRF in patients with primary hypertension.Patients with primary hypertension (n = 429; male: 213; female: 216) admitted to our department between January 2014 and December 2016 were included in this study. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of split and total renal function were determined using diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid tagged with 99mTc renal dynamic imaging method. For the same patient, the side with high GFR was considered as higher GFR kidney, whereas that with a low GFR was considered as lower GFR kidney. The split function score (Q value) was utilized to evaluate the differences of bilateral renal function. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the Q values (Group 1, Q value <5%; Group 2, Q value of 5%-10%; Group 3, Q value ≥10%). All the patients received antihypertensive therapy based on ACEI/ARB. The renal dynamic imaging was performed in the 1-year follow-up to investigate the changes of the SRF.Compared with the baseline level, significant decline was noticed in the serum creatinine (Scr) in Group 2 and Group 3 (P < .05). The cystatin C in Group 3 showed significant decline (P < .05). Compared with the baseline, there was significant decline in the Q value in Group 2, whereas the GFR of lower GFR kidney showed significant increase (P < .05). No statistical differences were noticed in the Q value and split GFR in Group 1 and Group 3 (P > .05).In primary hypertension patients, ACEI/ARB therapy could improve the SRF of lower GFR kidney in the presence of certain differences between the SRF. As a result, the SRF difference was reduced. In case of Q value in a range of 5% to 10%, ACEI/ARB could improve the renal function effectively. It may be significant for the design of antihypertensive drugs.

The effects of ACEI/ARB, aldosterone receptor antagonists and statins on preventing recurrence of atrial fibrillation: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias, and is high relative to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. AF-related complications and treatment costs bring about huge health burden, therefore the prevention recurrence of AF is imperative. "Upstream therapy" refers to the use of non-antiarrhythmic drugs (non-AADs) that modify the atrial substrate or target-specific mechanisms of AF to prevent the occurrence or recurrence of the arrhythmia. RAAS Blockers, aldosterone receptor antagonists and statins have an effect on preventing recurrence of atrial fibrillation. This protocol is designed for systematic review and network meta-analysis, which will assess comparative effects and safety of various non-antiarrhythmic drugs in preventing recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched from inception to Aug 31, 2020 to identify relevant studies. The Cochrane "Risk of bias" tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. The pair-wise meta-analysis will be performed by STATA 14.0 software. The network meta-analysis will be implemented in a Bayesian framework using Win BUGS 1.4.3 and the package "gemtc" V.0.8.1 of R-3.6.2 software. The network plots will be drawn using STATA 14.0 software. A comparison-adjusted funnel plot will be used to assess the publication bias using STATA 14.0 software. Quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

The results of this network meta-analysis will determine the preventive effect and rank ordering of these interventions for recurrence of AF. The report will follow the PRISMA checklist for network meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis will provide comprehensive evidence-based information in clinical practice.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202090004.

High-risk diabetic patients in Medicare Part D programs: are they getting the recommended ACEI/ARB therapy?

BACKGROUND

Diabetes patients with hypertension and/or renal disease are at an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical evidence suggests that the use of ACEI/ARB for these patients improves patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe ACEI/ARB utilization among high-risk patients with diabetes and to identify patient characteristics that predict suboptimal utilization of ACEI/ARB.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Diabetic patients with coexisting hypertension and/or renal disease with continuous Medicare coverage from October 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006 in six states (Alabama, California, Florida, Mississippi, New York, and Ohio).

INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

Any ACEI/ARB use during the first 6 months of 2006.

RESULTS

A total of 1,250,466 Medicare Part D enrollees met our inclusion criteria. ACEI/ARB utilization rates were 63%, 58.3%, and 43.1% among diabetic patients with hypertension and renal disease, hypertension without renal disease, and renal involvement without hypertension, respectively. After adjusting for all other characteristics studied, patients in the hypertension only (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.82-0.84) and renal disease only (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.46-0.50) risk groups were less likely to use ACEI/ARB compared to diabetes patients with both hypertension and renal disease. Several demographics, including male gender, age older than 65, and white race, were all predictors of suboptimal ACEI/ARB use. Results from state-specific analyses are consistent with those for all six states.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, less than 60% of high-risk patients with diabetes were receiving the recommended ACEI/ARB therapy. Several patient demographic and clinical characteristics are strongly associated with suboptimal ACEI/ARB use.