Masticatory performance in oral function assessment: Alternative methods

BACKGROUND

Masticatory function declines with age or disease, implicating a poor chewing efficiency and an often-unconscious change for a less healthy, yet easy to chew diet. Timely screening of masticatory function may foster an early-onset diagnosis and potential treatment. The aim of this study was to compare alternative diagnostic tools for masticatory function to a Jelly-scan test.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70 years and older who were hospitalised for rehabilitation were recruited for this study. A total of four different tests for masticatory function were administered. The Japanese Society of Gerodontology glucose extraction test (Jelly-scan) was used as reference to compare a colour-changing gum test (Gum1-colour) as well as a mixing ability test with a visual (Gum2-visual) and opto-electronical (Gum2-digital) analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish the discriminative value, kappa-values were used to estimate individual agreements and correlations were verified using Spearman's tests.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (Men n = 23, Women n = 38) aged 82.4 ± 6.8 years participated in the experiments. The average number of natural teeth was 16.5 ± 10.5, 34.4% of the participants wore removable dentures. For all tests, the sum of sensitivity and specificity was >150%. All test correlated with Jelly-scan (absolute Rho >0.5). With Jelly-scan 51 participants (83.6%) were diagnosed with "masticatory hypofunction". After reducing the cut-off value of the test from 100 mg/dL to 65 mg/dL, only 33 participants (54%) fulfilled the diagnosis. This post-hoc analysis increased the sensitivity of the Gum2-tests and the agreement to kappa >0.5 for all three tests.

CONCLUSION

All three tests can be considered useful screening alternatives. In its original version, Jelly-scan may tend to over-diagnose masticatory hypofunction, hence a novel cut-off with better agreement between tests is suggested.

Assessing masticatory performance with a colour-mixing ability test using smartphone camera images

Background

Colour‐mixing ability tests are frequently used to assess masticatory performance, but the image acquisition process may be cumbersome and technique sensitive.

Objectives

To evaluate the reliability of smartphone camera images in assessing masticatory performance using a colour‐mixing ability test.

Methods

Participants were recruited into three groups of dental state (n = 20 each): fully dentate, removable partial denture wearers and complete denture wearers. After performing a colour‐mixing ability test, images of the gum specimens (Hue‐Check Gum©) were captured with two smartphones and compared with the images obtained from a flatbed scanner by two examiners. The images were analysed with a subjective‐ (SA) and an opto‐electronical assessment (VoH). Inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability were tested. ANOVA models with repeated measures were used for statistical analysis (⍺ = .05).

Results

All three image acquisition techniques were able to distinguish masticatory performance between different dental states. For SA, inter‐rater reliability was fair to substantial and intra‐rater reliability was substantial to almost perfect. For VoH, inter‐rater reliability with the smartphones was at times different between two examiners, but the intra‐rater assessment was reliable. The opto‐electronic analysis with smartphone images underestimated the masticatory performance significantly when compared to the flatbed scanner analysis. Seven‐day ageing of the specimens did not significantly affect the results.

Conclusions

The assessment of masticatory performance with the Hue‐Check Gum© is a reliable method. The use of smartphones may occasionally underestimate masticatory performance; image acquisition with a flatbed scanner remains the gold standard. A centralised analysis of the photographed wafer may foster the reliability of the diagnosis.