Using analytical performance specifications in a medical laboratory

Analytical performance specifications (APS) are used for the quantitative assessment of assay analytical performance, with the aim of providing information appropriate for clinical care of patients. One of the major locations where APS are used is in the routine clinical laboratory. These may be used to assess and monitor assays in a range of settings including method selection, method verification or validation, external quality assurance, internal quality control and assessment of measurement uncertainty. The aspects of assays that may be assessed include imprecision, bias, selectivity, sample type, analyte stability and interferences. This paper reviews the practical use of APS in a routine clinical laboratory, using the laboratory I supervise as an example.

Verification of bile acid determination method and establishing reference intervals for biochemical and haematological parameters in third-trimester pregnant women

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to verify the bile acids (BA) method and to establish reference intervals (RIs) for bile acids (BA) and biochemical and haematological parameters in Croatian pregnant women.

METHODS

BA spectrophotometric method verification was performed on Siemens Atellica Solution CH 930 automated analyser using Sentinel reagent. Stability, precision, trueness, linearity, and RIs, as well as lipemia interference were tested according to CLSI guidelines. BA, biochemical, and haematological parameters were measured in serum (BA, biochemical) and whole blood (haematological) samples of fasting healthy third-trimester pregnant women from Croatia (n=121). The establishment of the RIs was done a priori according to the CLSI EP28-A3C:2010 guideline. Selected reference individuals' data were analysed using parametric, non-parametric, and robust methods.

RESULTS

Stability study showed that BA are stable in serum samples for 2 days at 20 °C, 14 days at 4-8 °C, and 22 days at -20 °C. The precision study and adult RIs verification met the criteria. Linearity was verified for the concentration range of 3.5-172.1 μmol/L whereas the lipemia interference test showed a positive bias (%) in BA concentration. The determined reference limits generally exhibited better precision for haematological parameters, being lower than the upper recommended value 0.2, unlike biochemical parameters. Haematological parameters showed notable differences between pregnant and non-pregnant women, while many biochemical parameters' RIs remained similar. Only ALT and GGT showed lower non-comparable RI upper limits in the population pregnant women.

CONCLUSIONS

Spectrophotometric BA method showed satisfactory performance and all examined parameters were within the set criteria. Moreover, RIs for key biochemical and haematological parameters, including BAs, have been established for the first time in the population of Croatian pregnant women.

The LEAP checklist for laboratory evaluation and analytical performance characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures

Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the LEAP checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.

The LEAP checklist for Laboratory Evaluation and Analytical Performance Characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures

Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript.The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the LEAP checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.

The LEAP checklist for laboratory evaluation and analytical performance characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures

Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the Laboratory Evaluation and Analytical Performance Characteristics (LEAP) checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.

The LEAP checklist for laboratory evaluation and analytical performance characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures

Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the LEAP checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.

A Reliable Method for Determining the Degree of Orientation of Fibrous Foods Using Laser Transmission and Computer Vision

The degree of organised alignment of fibre structures, referred to as the degree of orientation, significantly influences the textural properties and consumer acceptance of fibrous foods. To develop a new method to quantitatively characterise the fibre structure of such foods, a laser transmission imaging system is constructed to capture the laser beam spot on a sample, and the resulting image undergoes a series of image processing steps that use computer vision to translate the light and dark variations of the original images into distinct ellipses. The results show that the degree of orientation can be reasonably calculated from the ellipse obtained by fitting the outermost isopixel points. To validate the reliability of the newly developed method, we determine the degree of orientation of typical fibrous foods (extruded beef jerky, pork jerky, chicken jerky, and duck jerky). The ranking of the measured orientation agrees with the results of pseudocolour maps and micrographs, confirming the ability of the method to distinguish different fibrous foods. Furthermore, the relatively small coefficients of variation and the strong positive correlation between the degree of organisation and the degree of orientation confirm the reliability of this newly developed method.

Monitoring and environmental risk assessment of agricultural fungicide and insecticides in water, sediment from Kumkale Plain, Çanakkale-Turkey

This study was conducted to assess pesticide residues in 34 water and sediment samples taken from Kumkale Plain of Çanakkale-Turkey. Residue analyses were performed with the use of Quick-Easy-Cheap-Efficient-Rugged-Safe (QuEChERS)-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) procedure. For method verification, blank sediment and water samples were spiked at two limits of quantification (LOQ) levels of the pesticides. Overall recovery was 81.66% for sediment and 91.50% for water samples. In sediment samples, chlorpyrifos-M had the highest concentration, pyridaben was encountered in the majority of the samples (15 samples) and the highest number of pesticides (35) was seen in sample no. s13. In water samples, methoxyfenozide had the greatest concentration, metalaxyl was encountered in the highest number of samples (three samples) and the highest number of pesticide (8) was seen in sample no.w13. Sample no. s13 and w13 were taken from around the fountain basin. Pyraclostrobin and chlorantraniliprole residues exceeded the national limits set for water. In terms of hazard quotient (HQ), pesticides in sediment and waters were found to be safe. Despite the safe nature of pesticide on samples, greater attention has been paid on toxicity of the residues. It was concluded that authorities should put strict regulations on agrochemicals to reduce health risks of these chemicals.

Practical approach to method verification in plasma and validation in cerebrospinal fluid under accreditation using a flexible scope in molecular virology: setting up the HIV, HBV and HCV Aptima™ Quant Dx assays

Background Our laboratory obtained the ISO 15189 accreditation for the plasmatic HIV-1, HBV and HCV viral load (VL) using the m2000 RealTime™ system, which was recently changed for the platform Panther®. Here, we discuss a strategy for performing method validation/verification very quickly. Methods We performed the mandatory (repeatability, internal quality assessment [IQA], measurement uncertainty [MU]) and optional technical verifications for CE/IVD assays using the flexible scope range A. We also performed the mandatory assays for the validation of HIV-1 VL in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the flexible scope range B. The change was checked by following up on the turnaround time (TAT). Results The coefficient of variation (CV%) for repeatability and IQA complied with the limit of 0.25 log. The MU results ranged from 0.04 to 0.25 log copies or IU/mL. The comparisons of methods showed excellent correlations (R2 = 0.96 for the three parameters) but a delayed centrifugation on HCV VL showed variations of up to 2 log IU/mL. An excellent linearity for HIV-1 in the CSF was obtained from 1.5 to 5 log copies/mL with R2 = 0.99. The TAT increased (84%-98%) in routine usage. Conclusions The three Aptima assays are well suited for routine laboratory use and can be integrated within less than 2 weeks in accordance with flexible scope range A. Our data allows us to confidently perform HIV-1 VL in CSF following flexible scope range B. Finally, we provide an organizational guide for flexible scope management in molecular virology within a short time frame.

Verification of quantitative analytical methods in medical laboratories

Background

Globally, all medical laboratories seeking accreditation should meet international quality standards to perform certain specific tests. Quality management program provides disciplines targeted to ensure that quality standards have been implemented by a laboratory in order to generate correct results. The hallmark of the accreditation process is method verification and quality assurance. Before introducing a new method in your laboratory, it is important to assess certain performance characteristics that reflect the concept of method verification.

Methods

In this review, we illustrated how to verify the performance characteristics of a new method according to the recent guidelines. It includes an assessment of precision, trueness, analytical sensitivity, detection limits, analytical specificity, interference, measuring range, linearity, and measurement uncertainty.

Conclusions

Although the presence of several updated guidelines used to determine the performance characteristics of new methods in clinical chemistry laboratories, the real practice raised several concerns with the application of these guidelines which in need for further consideration in the upcoming updates of these guidelines.