Wang Y, Xue T, Chen Y. Effect of etomidate on the reuniens neuronal activity.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2021;
46:39-46. [PMID:
33678635 PMCID:
PMC10878289 DOI:
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190576]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To explore the effect of etomidate on the neuronal activity of ventral thalamic reuniens nucleus and the underlying mechanisms.
METHODS
Whole-cell patch clamp method was used to explore the effect of etomidate on the activity of ventral thalamic reuniens neurons in the acute brain slices obtained from 4-5 weeks old C57BL/6J mice. The electrophysiological characteristics of ventral thalamic reuniens neurons were recorded in the current clamp mode, and then the effects of etomidate (0.5, 2.0, 8.0 μmol/L etomidate groups) and intralipid (intralipid group) on the discharge frequency and membrane potential of ventral thalamic reuniens neurons were recorded. During the experiment, the ventral thalamic reuniens neuron firing rates (RNFRs) were recorded as FB, FD and Fw before, after administration, and after elution; and the membrane potential was recorded as MPB and MPD before, after administration. The chlorine channel of gamma-amino butyric acid Type A (GABAA) receptor was blocked with 100 μmol/L picrotoxin (PTX). The RNFRs were recorded as FBS, FETO and FETO+PTX before, after perfusing etomidate with sub-anesthesia concentration (0.5 μmol/L) and after perfusing both PTX and etomidate.
RESULTS
In the intralipid group, there was no significant difference among the FB, FD and Fw (P>0.05). But in the etomidate groups (0.5, 2.0, 8.0 μmol/L), the FD was less than the FB, there was significant difference (all P<0.01); the Fw was higher than the FD, there was significant difference (all P<0.05). Moreover, there was significant difference in the inhibitory degree of the RNFRs between the 0.5 μmol/L etomidate group and the 8.0 μmol/L etomidate group (P<0.05). In the experiment to explore the mechanism of etomidate (0.5 μmol/L), the FETO was compared with the FBS, there was significant difference (P<0.01); but when the FETO+PTX was compared with the FBS, there was no significant difference (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Etomidate can inhibit the activity of ventral thalamic reuniens neurons in concentration-dependent manner, and which is reversible. Etomidate with sub-anesthetic concentration inhibits the activity of ventral thalamic reuniens neurons via targeting the GABAA receptor.
Collapse