Effect of Direct Endovascular Revascularization Based on the Angiosome Model on Risk of Major Amputations and Life Expectancy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia and Foot Ulceration

BACKGROUND

We evaluated whether direct or indirect endovascular revascularization based on the angiosome model affects outcomes in type 2 diabetes and critical limb ischemia.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2015, 603 patients with type 2 diabetes were admitted for critical limb ischemia and submitted to endovascular revascularization. Among these patients, 314 (52%) underwent direct and 123 (20%) indirect revascularization, depending on whether the flow to the artery directly feeding the site of ulceration, according to the angiosome model, was successfully acquired; 166 patients (28%) were judged unable to be revascularized. Outcomes were healing, major amputation, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

An overall healing rate of 62.5% was observed: patients who did not receive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty presented a healing rate of 58.4% (P < .02 versus revascularized patients). A higher healing rate was observed in the direct versus the indirect group (82.4% versus 50.4%; P < .001). The major amputation rate was significantly higher in the indirect versus the direct group (9.2% versus 3.2%; P < .05). The overall mortality rate was 21.6%, and it was higher in the indirect versus the direct group (24% versus 14%; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that direct revascularization of arteries supplying the diabetic foot ulcer site by means of the angiosome model is associated with a higher healing rate and lower risk of amputation and death compared with the indirect procedure. These results support use of the angiosome model in type 2 diabetes with critical limb ischemia.

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glucose control of elderly people with type 2 diabetes in Italy

AIMS

to evaluate the effect of home confinement related to COVID-19 lockdown on metabolic control in subjects with T2DM in Italy.

METHODS

we evaluated the metabolic profile of 304 individuals with T2DM (65% males; age 69 ± 9 years; diabetes duration 16 ± 10 years) attending our Diabetes Unit early at the end of lockdown period (June 8 to July 7, 2020) and compared it with the latest one recorded before lockdown.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose (8.6 ± 2.1 vs 8.8 ± 2.5 mmol/L; P = 0.353) and HbA1c (7.1 ± 0.9 vs 7.1 ± 0.9%; P = 0.600) before and after lockdown. Worsening of glycaemic control (i.e., ΔHbA1c ≥ 0.5%) occurred more frequently in older patients (32.2% in > 80 years vs 21.3% in 61-80 years vs 9.3% in < 60 years; P = 0.05) and in insulin users (28.8 vs 16.5%; P = 0.012). On multivariable analysis, age > 80 years (OR 4.62; 95%CI: 1.22-16.07) and insulin therapy (OR 1.96; 95%CI: 1.10-3.50) remained independently associated to worsening in glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

Home confinement related to COVID-19 lockdown did not exert a negative effect on glycaemic control in patients with T2DM. However, age and insulin therapy can identify patients at greatest risk of deterioration of glycaemic control.

Type 1 diabetes and COVID-19: The "lockdown effect"

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect the lockdown imposed during COVID-19 outbreak on the glycemic control of people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) using Continuous (CGM) or Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed glucose reading obtained by FGM or CGM in T1D subjects. Sensor data from 2 weeks before the lockdown (Period 0, P₀), 2 weeks immediately after the lockdown (period 1, P₁), in mid-lockdown (Period 2, P₂) and immediately after end of lockdown (Period 3, P₃) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 63 T1D patients, (FGM: 52, 82%; CGM:11, 18%). Sensor use (91%) were slightly reduced. Despite this reduction, Time in Range increased in P₁ (62%), P₂ (61%) and P₃ (62%) as compared to P₀ (58%, all p < 0.05 or less) with concomitant reduction in the Time Above Range (P₀: 38%; P₁: 34%, P₂: 34%, P₃: 32%, all p < 0.05 or less vs. P₀). Average glucose and GMI improved achieving statistical difference in P₃ (165 vs. 158 mg/dl, p = 0.040 and 7.2% (55 mmol/mol) vs. 7.0% (53 mmol/mol), p = 0.016) compared to P0. Time Below Range (TBR) and overall glucose variability remained unchanged. Bi-hourly analysis of glucose profile showed an improvement particularly in the early morning hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In T1D subjects with good glycemic control on CGM or FGM, the lockdown had no negative impact. Rather a modest but significant improvement in glycemic control has been recorded, most likely reflecting more regular daily life activities and reduces work-related distress.

Hyperglycemia at Hospital Admission Is Associated With Severity of the Prognosis in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: The Pisa COVID-19 Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether at-admission hyperglycemia is associated with worse outcomes in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Hospitalized COVID-19 patients (N = 271) were subdivided based on at-admission glycemic status: 1) glucose levels <7.78 mmol/L (NG) (N = 149 [55.0%]; median glucose 5.99 mmol/L [range 5.38-6.72]), 2) known diabetes mellitus (DM) (N = 56 [20.7%]; 9.18 mmol/L [7.67-12.71]), and 3) no diabetes and glucose levels ≥7.78 mmol/L (HG) (N = 66 [24.3%]; 8.57 mmol/L [8.18-10.47]).

RESULTS

Neutrophils were higher and lymphocytes and PaO₂/FiO₂ lower in HG than in DM and NG patients. DM and HG patients had higher D-dimer and worse inflammatory profile. Mortality was greater in HG (39.4% vs. 16.8%; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.20, 95% CI 1.27-3.81, P = 0.005) than in NG (16.8%) and marginally so in DM (28.6%; 1.73, 0.92-3.25, P = 0.086) patients. Upon multiple adjustments, only HG remained an independent predictor (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.03-3.15, P = 0.04). After stratification by quintile of glucose levels, mortality was higher in quintile 4 (Q4) (3.57, 1.46-8.76, P = 0.005) and marginally in Q5 (29.6%) (2.32, 0.91-5.96, P = 0.079) vs. Q1.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycemia is an independent factor associated with severe prognosis in people hospitalized for COVID-19.

Diabetic foot surgery "Made in Italy". Results of 15 years of activity of a third-level centre managed by diabetologists

AIM

To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients who underwent diabetic foot surgery (DFS) managed directly by diabetologists in a third-level Centre over 15-year.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1.857 patients affected by diabetic foot (Age 67.1 ± 12.3 yrs, diabetes duration 19.2 ± 9.8 yrs, HbA1c 8.1 ± 2.0%) treated in our Department between 2001 and 2015 and divided them into 3 groups: Group 1, treated between 2001 and 2005 (448 pts), group 2, between 2006 and 2010 (540 pts) and Group 3, between 2011 and 2015 (869 pts). Main clinical outcomes [peripheral revascularization rate (PR), healing rate (HR), healing time (HT), recurrences after healing (R), major amputation (MA) and death (D) rates] were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The overall outcomes of our cohort were: HR 81.6% (HT 143 ± 54 days), PR 84.8%, MA 4.9% and D 27.9%. There were no differences in clinical characteristics, except for age, higher (p < 0.05) in Group 3 (70.6 ± 14.7 yrs) than in Groups 1 (64.4 ± 11.6 yrs) and 2 (65.1 ± 11.2 yrs). No differences emerged when comparing HR and MA; HT was shorter (p < 0.05) in group 3 (104 ± 44 days) than in Group 2 (169 ± 72 days) and 1 (235 ± 67 days). D was higher (p < 0.05) in Group 3 (43.8%) than in Group 1 (23.1%) and 2 (28.1%). PR was 19.4% in Group 1, 28.1% in Group 2 and 53.8% in Group 3 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increasing age and complexity of patients our data show improvement of outcomes throughout 15 years, probably due to better surgical techniques, more aggressive medical therapy and more effective treatment of critical limb ischemia.

COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes

Since the initial COVID-19 outbreak in China, much attention has focused on people with diabetes because of poor prognosis in those with the infection. Initial reports were mainly on people with type 2 diabetes, although recent surveys have shown that individuals with type 1 diabetes are also at risk of severe COVID-19. The reason for worse prognosis in people with diabetes is likely to be multifactorial, thus reflecting the syndromic nature of diabetes. Age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease, obesity, and a pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulative state all probably contribute to the risk of worse outcomes. Glucose-lowering agents and anti-viral treatments can modulate the risk, but limitations to their use and potential interactions with COVID-19 treatments should be carefully assessed. Finally, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection itself might represent a worsening factor for people with diabetes, as it can precipitate acute metabolic complications through direct negative effects on β-cell function. These effects on β-cell function might also cause diabetic ketoacidosis in individuals with diabetes, hyperglycaemia at hospital admission in individuals with unknown history of diabetes, and potentially new-onset diabetes.

Adherence to guideline recommended medical therapies in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic critical limb ischemia

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to guideline recommended medical therapies in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic critical limb ischemia (CCLI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1315 admissions performed in our Department, focusing on diabetic foot patients (842-64%) of which 603 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients with CCLI (M/F(%): 73/27; age: 70.3 ± 10.4 yrs; diabetes duration: 17.3 ± 13.7 yrs; BMI: 27.7 ± 5.3 Kg/m²; HbA1c 7.8 ± 1.8%) referred to a third-level Center from 2011 to 2015. We focused on medical therapy of diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and smoke habits.

RESULTS

In total, at admission, 66.6% of patients had HbA1c levels higher than recommended; 65.9% of patients were on statins; 81.4% on anti-hypertensive treatment and 72.4% on antiplatelet drugs. Concerning smoke habits, 27% of patients were no-smokers; 41% former smokers and 32% active smokers. Among all patients, only 24% were prescribed all five guideline recommended therapies while 32% reached four out of five of these. As for patients treated with anti-hypertensive drugs, we observed higher levels of systolic pressure (138.0 ± 29.5 vs 107.7 ± 36.6 p < 0.02) while no differences were observed in diastolic pressure levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, when it comes to diabetic patients with a severe limb and life threatening clinical condition, we noticed a lower-than-expected application of international guideline-recommended medical therapies. In fact, only one out of four patients was following all the recommended therapies. Nevertheless, these patients did not reach the standard targets requested to prevent cardiovascular disease.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade Anti-PD-L1 as a Trigger for Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome

Context

The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway is a key regulator in T-cell activation and tolerance, limiting effector T-cell function in peripheral tissues. Atezolizumab, an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of some types of advanced cancer. Its main treatment-related adverse events are immune related, such as thyroid dysfunction and hypophysitis. Autoimmune endocrinopathy can occur as isolated manifestations; only a few cases of autoimmune polyendocrine syndromes have been reported thus far.

Case

We report a case of polyendocrine syndrome type 2, characterized by Addison disease (AD), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), accompanied by hypophysitis, in a patient treated with atezolizumab. Testing was positive for 21-hydroxylase and pituitary antibodies and negative for islet cells antibodies. HLA typing revealed DRB1*04 and DQB1*03 haplotypes, which are associated with increased susceptibility to T1DM and AD.

Conclusion

The type and severity of immune-related adverse events in polyendocrine syndrome type 2 are different and depend on the monoclonal antibody used. Although the numerous molecular mechanisms inducing autoimmune endocrine diseases are still unclear, a link exists between HLA haplotypes, gene variants involved in immune checkpoint molecule expression, and increased susceptibility to autoimmune endocrinopathies. Additional studies are needed to identify susceptible patients and adapt therapy to each patient.

Safety and effectiveness of therapeutic magnetic resonance in diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy and safety of therapeutic magnetic resonance (TMR) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), the authors designed a prospective randomised controlled trial in three highly specialised diabetic foot clinics.

METHOD

All the patients consecutively visited in a period of 18 months were screened according to the inclusion (presence of an ulcer >1 cm² in the foot lasting at least 6 weeks; ABPI>0.6; consent to participate in the study) and exclusion (Charcot's foot; local or systemic infections; chronic renal failure; any wearable electrically-driven life-supporting device) criteria. Patients, who were treated according to international guideline protocols, were randomised into two groups: group A received for four weeks the sham application of TMR, while group B received the active TMR for the same period. People were followed-up to 10 weeks and healing rate (HR), healing time (HT), rate of granulation tissue on wound bed (% GT), reduction of the area of the lesion (∆AL) and a score (0-3) evaluating erythema, oedema, pain and tenderness, respectively, were measured. Adverse events (AE) were registered and monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in HR, HT and ∆AL between the two groups during follow-up, while % GT and the scores for erythema, oedema and pain at 10 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements in group B compared with group A and versus baseline. When restricted to non-ischaemic patients (ABPI>0.8), ∆AL was significantly (p<0.05) more pronounced in group B than in group A. No difference in AE occurrence was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study, despite not being able to demonstrate the effectiveness of TMR on healing rate at 10 weeks, with 4 weeks of active treatment in neuro-ischaemic DFUs, shows positive effects on clinical aspects of the DFU and is associated with a significant increase of GT in the wound bed.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The study has been fully sponsored by Thereson S.p.A., manufacturer of TMR devices.

Type 2 diabetic patient with a foot ulcer as initial manifestation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A case report

Diabetic foot ulcerations (DFU) represent a major cause of hospitalization and amputation. In people with diabetes it's not uncommon to find chronic wounds due to pathogenic mechanisms different from diabetes. Here we report the case of a foot lesion misdiagnosed as DFU but actually caused by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Quantitative assessment of early biomechanical modifications in diabetic foot patients: the role of foot kinematics and step width

BACKGROUND

Forefoot ulcers (FU) are one of the most disabling and relevant chronic complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). In recent years there is emerging awareness that a better understanding of the biomechanical factors underlying the diabetic ulcer could lead to improve the management of the disease, with significant socio-economic impacts. Our purpose was to try to detect early biomechanical factors associated with disease progression.

METHODS

Thirty subjects (M/F: 22/8; mean age ± SD: 61,84 ± 10 years) with diagnosis of type II DM were included. The participants were divided into 3 groups (10 subjects per group) according to the stage of evolution of the disease: Group 1, subjects with newly diagnosed type II DM, without clinical or instrumental diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) nor FU (group called "DM"); Group 2, with DPN but without FU (group called "DPN"); Group 3, with DPN and FU (group called "DNU"). All subjects underwent 3-D Gait Analysis during walking at self-selected speed, measuring spatio-temporal, kinematic and kinetic parameters and focusing on ankle and foot joints. The comparative analysis of values between groups was performed using 1-way ANOVA. We also investigated group to group differences with Tukey HSD test. The results taken into consideration were those with a significance of P < 0,05. 95 % confidence interval was also calculated.

RESULTS

A progressive and significant trend of reduction of ROM in flexion-extension of the metatarso-phalangeal joint (P = 0.0038) and increasing of step width (P = 0.0265) with the advance of the disease was evident, with a statistically significant difference comparing subjects with recently diagnosed diabetes mellitus and subjects with diabetic neuropathy and foot ulcer (P = 0.0048 for ROM and P = 0.0248 for step width at Tukey's test).

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence that foot segmental kinematics, along with step width, can be proposed as simple and clear indicators of disease progression. This can be the starting point for planning more targeted strategies to prevent the occurrence and the recurrence of a FU in diabetic subjects.

Necrotizing Fasciitis and The Diabetic Foot

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) represents a rapidly progressive, life-threatening infection involving skin, soft tissue, and deep fascia. An early diagnosis is crucial to treat NF effectively. The disease is generally due to an external trauma that occurs in predisposed patients: the most important risk factor is represented by diabetes mellitus. NF is classified into 3 different subtypes according to bacterial strains responsible: type 1 associated to polymicrobial infection, type 2 NF, generally associated to Streptococcus species, often associated to Staphylococcus aureus and, eventually, Type 3, due to Gram-negative strains, such as Clostridium difficile or Vibrio. NF is usually characterized by the presence of the classic triad of symptoms: local pain, swelling, and erythema. In daily clinical practice immune-compromised or neuropathic diabetic patients present with atypical symptomatology. This explains the high percentage of misdiagnosed cases in the emergency department and, consequently, the worse outcome presented by these patients. Prompt aggressive surgical debridement and antibiotic systemic therapy are the cornerstone of its treatment. These must be associated with an accurate systemic management, consisting in nutritional support, glycemic compensation, and hemodynamic stabilization. Innovative methods, such as negative pressure therapy, once the acute conditions have resolved, can help fasten the surgical wound closure. Prompt management can improve prognosis of patients affected from NF reducing limb loss and saving lives.

Safety and Effectiveness of Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance in the Management of Postsurgical Lesion of the Diabetic Foot

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of therapeutic magnetic resonance (TMR) in the management of the diabetic foot (DF), we treated a group of consecutive type 2 diabetic inpatients with wide postsurgical lesions (Group A: N = 10; age 67.7 ± 18.9 years, duration of diabetes 22.3 ± 6.6 years, 8.1 ± 1.1%, body mass index 29.4 ± 2.1 kg/m2), for 2 consecutive weeks, while admitted, with a low-intensity magnetic resonance equipment, in addition to standard treatment. Patients, compared with a matched control group with the same clinical characteristics (Group B), were then followed monthly for 6 months to evaluate healing rate (HR), healing time (HT), rate of granulation tissue (GT) at 3 months, and adverse events. HR was of 90% in Group A and 30% in Group B ( P < .05); GT was 73.7 ± 13.2% in Group A versus 51.84 ± 18.77% in Group B ( P < .05). HT in Group A was 84.46 ± 54.38 days versus 148.54 ± 78.96 days in Group B ( P < .01). No difference in adverse events (5 in Group A and 6 in Group B) was observed throughout the study period. In this pilot study, the use of TMR at this dose and duration was safe. The results also permit the observation that TMR plus standard care offered a faster healing rate compared with standard care alone.

Do you want to organize a multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic? We can help

The diabetic foot (DF) is a complex pathology involving the lower limb of 8 to 10 million people around the world, and its prevalence is rising, creating a dramatic need for effective therapeutic answers. The multidisciplinary DF clinic has been proposed as a model to fight this complication from the International Working Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) inside a more articulated 3-level organization strategy. The organization and technical aspects of this strategy, together with the characteristics of each of the 3 levels have been analyzed and described in the article, together with the aims and limitations of each of the levels to cope with a 3-dimensional pathology involving systemic, local, and logistic aspects. The implementation of this model in Europe produced positive results measured so far in at least 2 nationwide experiences, in Germany and in Italy, and it should be taken in account whenever health policies apply to the DF issue.

Sulodexide as Adjunctive Therapy in Diabetic Foot Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Treated With Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of sulodexide, a biocompound of glycosamin-glicans, as adjunct medical therapy to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). We studied 27 consecutive DM patients with CLI successfully subjected to PTA who, on top of standard antiplatelet therapy, received sulodexide 25 mg bid, and were followed-up for 24 weeks, monitoring adverse events, transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO₂), ankle-brachial pressure index, pain, and ulcer dimension. At the end of follow-up, ulcer healing, amputation rates, and cardiovascular risk profile of patients were evaluated. Patients were compared with a historical superimposable control group that was treated for the same indications in the same way as the study group, except for sulodexide inception. No differences in ulcer healing and amputation rates were found at the end of follow-up between the groups. In the study group, TcPO₂ was significantly (P < .05) higher at the end of follow-up, and pain intensity was reduced more rapidly. Plasma fibrinogen and plasma creatinine concentration were significantly (P < .05) reduced in study group at the end of follow-up. No differences in adverse events were observed between the groups during follow-up. Our data suggest that sulodexide administration after PTA, on top of antiplatelet therapy, may improve the outcome of PTA in DM patients with CLI by improving microcirculatory function.

Custom-made orthesis and shoes in a structured follow-up program reduces the incidence of neuropathic ulcers in high-risk diabetic foot patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a structured follow-up program on the incidence of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) in high-risk diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 1874 diabetic patients referred to the Diabetic Foot Unit of the University of Pisa were ranked based on the ulcerative risk score proposed by the International Consensus on Diabetic Foot. Out of 334 patients (17.8%) with a score ≥2, 298 accepted to participate in this prospective trial and were randomized into 2 groups: group A, which received standard treatment, and group B, in which the patients received, as a part of a structured prevention program, custom-made orthesis and shoes. Incidence of new DFUs was observed for no less than 1 year and in a subset of patients after 3 and 5 years, respectively. Incidence of new DFUs and recurrences were considered as primary endpoints to establish the effectiveness of the program; costs were also compared.

RESULTS

Among the patients enrolled in this follow-up analysis, 46% had neuropathy and deformities, 20% had previous ulceration, 25% had previous minor amputation, and 9% had neuro-osteoarthropathy. During the first 12-month follow-up, 11.5% of patients in group B developed a DFU compared with 38.6% in group A (P < .0001). In the extended follow-up, the cumulative incidence of ulcer in group B compared with group A was 17.6% versus 61% (P < .0001) after 3 years and 23.5% versus 72% (P < .0001) after 5 years, respectively. The net balance at the end of the follow-up was highly in favor of the prevention program, with a saving of more than €100 000 per year.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a structured follow-up with the use of orthesis and shoes can reduce the incidence of DFU in diabetic patients who are at high ulcerative risk and its related costs.

Results of pancreas transplantation alone with special attention to native kidney function and proteinuria in type 1 diabetes patients

We report on our single-center experience with pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) in 71 patients with type 1 diabetes, and a 4-year follow-up. Portal insulin delivery was used in 73.2% of cases and enteric drainage of exocrine secretion in 100%. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (76%), or thymoglobulin (24%), followed by mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and low-dose steroids. Actuarial patient and pancreas survival at 4 years were 98.4% and 76.7%, respectively. Relaparatomy was needed in 18.3% of patients. Restored endogenous insulin secretion resulted in sustained normalization of fasting plasma glucose levels and HbA1c concentration in all technically successful transplantations. Protenuria (24-hour) improved significantly after PTA. Renal function declined only in recipients with pretransplant glomerular filtration rate (GFR) greater than 90 ml/min, possibly as a result of correction of hyperfiltration following normalization of glucose metabolism. Further improvements were recorded in several cardiovascular risk factors, retinopathy, and neuropathy. We conclude that PTA was an effective and reasonably safe procedure in this single-center experience.

Pancreas transplant alone has beneficial effects on retinopathy in type 1 diabetic patients

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The effects of successful pancreas transplant alone (PTA) on chronic complications of diabetes, in particular diabetic retinopathy, remain disputed. We prospectively studied the course of diabetic retinopathy in PTA recipients and in non-transplanted (non-PTA) type 1 diabetic patients.

METHODS

The PTA and non-PTA groups consisted respectively of 33 (follow-up: 30 +/- 11 months) and 35 patients (follow-up: 28 +/- 10 months). Best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, ophthalmoscopy, retinal photographs, and in selected cases angiography were performed. Diabetic retinopathy and its improvement/deterioration were assessed according to criteria proposed by the Eurodiab Study.

RESULTS

At baseline, 9% of PTA and 6% of non-PTA patients had no diabetic retinopathy, 24 and 29% had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), whereas 67 and 66% had laser-treated and/or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (LT/PDR), respectively. No new case of diabetic retinopathy occurred in either group during follow-up. In the NPDR PTA group, 50% of patients improved by one grading, and 50% showed no change. In the LT/PDR PTA, stabilisation was observed in 86% of cases, whereas worsening of retinopathy occurred in 14% of patients. In the NPDR non-PTA group, diabetic retinopathy improved in 20% of patients, remained unchanged in 10%, and worsened in the remaining 70%. In the LT/PDR non-PTA group, retinopathy did not change in 43% and deteriorated in 57% of patients. Overall, the percentage of patients with improved or stabilised diabetic retinopathy was significantly higher in the PTA group. No differences were found between the two groups with regard to cataract lesions and intraocular pressure values.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Despite a relatively short follow-up, our study shows that successful PTA can positively affect the course of diabetic retinopathy.

Neoral versus prograf in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with portal venous drainage: three-year results of a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND

The preferential use of tacrolimus (Prograf) over cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is mainly based on historical, retrospective studies. We herein report the 3-year results of a single-center, prospective, randomized comparison of the two calcineurin inhibitors in the setting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppression and portal drainage of pancreas allografts.

METHODS

Between May 2001 and August 2004, 47 SPKTx recipients who were stratified by recipient sex, were alternatively assigned to treatment with Neoral (n = 22) or Prograf (n = 25). Concurrent immunosuppression included induction treatment with basiliximab and maintenance with MMF and steroids.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 24.0 months, all patients remained in the study arm into which they were initially enrolled. No pancreas rejection episode was observed. One acute kidney rejection was recorded in the Neoral arm (4.5%) as compared with 7 (28.0%) including one steroid-resistant episode, in the Prograf arm (P = .03). The cumulative incidence of adverse events was 31.8% (n = 7) in the Neoral arm compared with 92.0% (n = 23) in the Prograf arm (P < .0001). One patient died in each study arm. Patient, pancreas, and kidney survivals overlapped at 1- and 3-years posttransplant, namely all 95.4% for the Neoral arm compared with 95.8%, 91.8%, and 95.8%, respectively, for the Prograf arm (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in MMF-based immunosuppression there is no convincing evidence that Prograf should be preferred to Neoral in SPKTx.

A technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation (PTx) with portal-enteric drainage (PED) has been associated with difficulties in respect to arterial anastomosis and graft accessibility for percutaneous biopsy. We describe a new technique that circumvents these difficulties.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and April 2004, a total of 113 recipients were scheduled for PTx with PED. The superior mesenteric vein was approached from the right retroperitoneal aspect instead of from the anterior transmesenteric route. The pancreas graft was eventually placed in the right retroperitoneal space, being covered by the ascending colon and its mesentery.

RESULTS

One hundred ten (97.3%) PTx were performed as planned. Systemic venous effluent was preferred in three patients because of incidental diagnosis of liver cirrhosis during surgery (n=1) and severe obesity (body mass index>35 kg/m2) (n=2). The Y iliac artery graft was kept as short as possible, and arterial anastomosis was always performed with ease. After a mean follow-up period of 21.2+/-19.9 months, the relaparotomy rate was 13.6%. No patient died after repeat surgery, and none required multiple relaparotomies. Overall, 10 grafts were lost because of acute rejection (n=3), chronic rejection (n=2), venous thrombosis (n=2), recipient death (n=2), and late (6-month) arterial thrombosis (n=1). One-year patient and graft survival were 98.1% and 90.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that PTx with PED is not associated with an increased risk. The technique described has distinctive technical advantages and should be included in the repertoire of PTx.

The beneficial effects of pancreas transplant alone on diabetic nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

Pancreas transplant alone can be effective in significantly improving the quality of life of type 1 diabetic patients, and it can also eliminate acute diabetes complications, such as hypoglycemic and/or hyperglycemic episodes. The effects of pancreas transplant alone on long-term complications of diabetes, including nephropathy, are still not settled. We evaluated whether restoration of long-lasting normoglycemia by pancreas transplant alone might have beneficial action on diabetic nephropathy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 32 type 1 diabetic patients were evaluated before and 1 year after successful pancreas transplant alone, together with 30 matched nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects. Several metabolic and kidney function parameters were measured, including plasma glucose, glycohemoglobin (A1C), C-peptide, plasma lipids, blood pressure, creatinine, creatinine clearance, and urinary protein excretion.

RESULTS

Pancreas transplant alone restored sustained normoglycemia, without exogenous insulin administration, and improved plasma lipid levels. Blood pressure decreased significantly. Creatinine concentrations and clearances did not differ before and after transplantation. Urinary protein excretion decreased significantly after pancreas transplant alone, with four microalbuminuric and three macroalbuminuric patients who became normoalbuminuric. None of these changes occurred in the nontransplanted group.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful pancreas transplant alone, through restoration of sustained normoglycemia, improves diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients.

Effects of pancreas-kidney transplantation on diabetic retinopathy

The effects of pancreas transplantation (PTx) on diabetic retinopathy (DR) are still debated. We studied the course of DR in 48 patients (age: 40 +/- 7 years; males/females 26/22, body mass index (BMI): 23.0 +/- 2.4 kg/m2, duration of diabetes: 24 +/- 8 years) bearing a successful PTx (combined with a kidney). Follow-up ranged 6-60 months (median: 17 months). Before transplantation, according to the Eurodiab Study classification, 12 patients (25%) had nonproliferative retinopathy (NPDR; mild, moderate or severe), and 36 patients (75%) had laser-treated and/or proliferative retinopathy (LT/PDR). During the follow-up, in the NPDR group improvement/deterioration was defined as regression/progression to a lower/higher retinopathy grade; in the LT/PTD group, stabilization was defined as no new neo-vessel formation or development of new lesions requiring laser-treatment. In the NPDR group, five (41.7%) patients improved of one or more lesion grading, three (25%) patients showed no change, and four (33.3%) patients progressed of one grade. In the LT/PDR group, the post-transplant data were: stabilization in 35 (97%) patients, and worsening in one (3%) patient. The number of improved/stabilized patients was significantly higher in the transplanted than in a control group of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic patients. In conclusion, despite a relatively short follow-up period, successful PTx in our cohort of patients was associated with improvement and/or stabilization of DR in the majority of recipients.

Successful solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage following unsuccessful islet cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

There are no data regarding the outcome of solitary pancreas transplantation (SPT) with portal venous drainage (PVD) following unsuccessful islet transplantation (ITx) after multiple islet injections into the portal vein. We herein describe the outcome of three SPTs with PVD performed after failed ITx.

METHODS

Between October 2002 and December 2003, three SPTs with PVD were performed following unsuccessful ITx with multiple intraportal islet injections (mean 2.3 injections: range 2 to 3 injections) in two women and one man, aged 26, 49, and 60 years. Panel reactive antibody titer was 0% in all recipients. Immunosuppression was based on induction with either basiliximab (n = 2) or thymoglobulin (n = 1); maintenance therapy included steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. During the recipient operation, the absence of venous hypertension was established by direct measurement of portal pressure, before making the final decision to drain the pancreas into the portal vein.

RESULTS

Portal pressures were 16 cm H2O, 14 cm H2O, and 13 cm H2O. Pancreas grafts were reperfused after a period of cold preservation of 638, 695, and 835 minutes, respectively. All grafts showed immediate endocrine function, maintaining their recipients insulin-independent for longest follow-ups of 8, 21, and 23 months, respectively. One recipient developed a nonocclusive venous thrombus that resolved with intravenous heparin infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed that unsuccessful ITx with multiple intraportal injections does not necessarily preclude the possibility of subsequent successful SPT with PVD. Further experience is needed to define contraindications and possible complications of SPT with PVD following ITx.

Ninety-Five Percent Insulin Independence Rate 3 Years After Pancreas Transplantation Alone With Portal-Enteric Drainage

AIMS

Portal-enteric drainage (PED) might be particularly suitable for pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), since it has been associated with an immunologic advantage and achieves excellent metabolic results. We describe our experience with a consecutive series of 40 PTAs with PED.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and March 2004, 40 consecutive PTAs were performed with PED. Recipients were selected according to the American Diabetic Association recommendations. Donors were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although matching for A and B loci was considered at the time of graft allocation. Immunosuppression consisted of induction treatment with basiliximab (n = 34) or thymoglobulin (n = 6), and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus.

RESULTS

After a mean cold ischemia time of 690 minutes (range, 517-965 min) all pancreases functioned immediately. Three grafts were lost due to hyperacute or accelerated rejection. No graft was lost to vascular thrombosis, although 5 (12.5%) nonocclusive thromboses were identified and the grafts were rescued with intravenous heparin infusion. A repeat laparotomy was required in 7 recipients (17.5%) No patient required multiple repeat laparotomies, and none died. After a mean follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 1-36 mo), 2 recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes, which were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 3-year patient, and graft survival rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The following parameters showed significant improvement compared with pretransplantation evaluation: hemoglobin A1C concentration, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, arterial blood pressure, cardiac performance, retinopathy, proteinuria, and neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation alone with PED provides high rates of long-term insulin-independence.

Retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

Portal-enteric drainage (PED) is the latest refinement in the surgical technique for pancreas transplantation (PTx). We herein describe the results of a modified technique for PED that places the pancreas in a totally retroperitoneal position.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and June 2003, 79 PTx were performed using a retroperitoneal PED technique.

RESULTS

No graft was lost due to surgical complications and the relaparotomy rate was 11.4%. Mean hospital stay averaged 25.9 days (+/-14.4 days) with a 30-day readmission rate of 12.7%. One graft was lost due to delayed (6 months) arterial thrombosis and three to acute rejection. The overall 1-year patient and graft survivals were 98.7% and 93.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that PED of pancreas grafts is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. Whether retroperitoneal graft placement has actual advantages over the "classical" intraperitoneal position remains to be ascertained.

Pancreas transplantation from marginal donors

BACKGROUND

Marginal donor organs are a supplementary source of grafts that has not been fully exploited for pancreas transplantation (PTx).

METHODS

A total of 100 PTx were performed with grafts procured from either 48 nonmarginal donors (NMD) or 52 marginal donors (MD), namely age greater than 45 years and/or severe hemodynamic instability at the time of procurement. PTx outcome was evaluated as the incidence of delayed endocrine pancreas function (DEPF), the complication rate, and the patient and graft survivals.

RESULTS

The DEPF rate was 6.2% for NMD as compared to 0 for MD (P >.05). Relaparotomy rate was 12.5% for NMD and 9.6% for MD (P >.05). Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% and 94.2% for NMD and MD, respectively (P >.05). Equivalent figures for patients were 97.9% and 98.1%, respectively (P >.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas from MD may be safely employed and significantly expand the donor pool for PTx.

Portal enteric–drained solitary pancreas transplantation without surveillance biopsy: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

Most solitary pancreas transplants (SPTx) fail due to unrecognized rejection episodes. Consequently, SPTx are monitored by drainage into the bladder or by surveillance biopsies.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and June 2003, a consecutive series of 48 SPTx were performed using portal enteric drainage (PED). Rejection episodes were diagnosed empirically, based on the elevated pancreatic enzymes without a surveillance biopsy. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (n = 42) or ATG (n = 6), low-dose steroids, MMF, and tacrolimus. Donors (mean age 28.9 year; range 9 to 54 year) were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although the best HLA matching was considered at the time of graft allocation.

RESULTS

After a mean cold ischemia time of 676 minutes (range 475 to 900 minutes), all but two pancreata (95.8%) functioned immediately. Relaparotomy was required in seven cases (14.6%). Three grafts were lost in the early posttransplant period due to hyperacute rejection. Two additional grafts were lost later due to arterial thrombosis or to chronic rejection. After a median follow-up period of 12.2 months (range 0.2 to 27 months) three further recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes that were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 93.1% and 2-year figures 100% and 88.7%, respectively. At the longest follow-up no recipient was diagnosed with a malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

With current immunosuppression protocols SPTx achieves high rates of insulin independence even without surveillance biopsy or routine use of T-cell-depleting therapies.

Solitary pancreas transplantation: preliminary findings about early reduction of proteinuria in incipient or evident diabetic type I nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

Our work was aimed to evaluate the precocious reduction of proteinuria in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus type 1 with incipient and evident nephropathy after isolated pancreas transplantation (PTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2000 to March 2003, we followed 24 PTA grafts in 24 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (mean age 37.8 years; mean duration of diabetes 24.8 years). The pancreas was transplanted with portal-enteric drainage in 23 patients and systemic-enteric in 1 patient. The immunosuppressive therapy used basilixmab induction and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mophetil (MMF), and low dose steroid maintenance therapy. The renal function, proteinuria, and the glucose metabolic parameters were evaluated before and during the following months after transplant.

RESULTS

All patients are alive and twenty-one have a well-functioning pancreas with three grafts lost. All patients had persistence of normal renal function. Before transplantation 12 patients displayed proteinuria that was clearly reduced in 11 and gone in three patients, all of whom were insulin-independent.

CONCLUSIONS

TPA seems to reduce, and in some cases to regress, the proteinuria associated with early diabetic nephropathy.

Pancreas transplant alone

Pancreas transplant alone (PTA) represents a growing proportion of overall pancreas transplantations, with 1-year patient and graft survivals of almost 100% and higher than 80%, respectively. PTA can restore normoglycemia without exogenous insulin administration and eliminate acute diabetic complications. In our series of 28 PTA, performed with portal-enteric drainage, 2-year patient and pancreas survivals were 100% and 87%, respectively. In patients with successful transplantation, rapid normalization of blood glucose level and HbA1c concentration was observed, due to restored endogenous insulin secretion. Several classical cardiovascular risk factors were measured before and after transplant, with significant improvements shortly after transplantation. Diabetic retinopathy improved in 58.8% of examined eyes, stabilized in 35.3%, and worsened in 5.9%. In conclusion, PTA represents a clinically relevant option for patients with type 1 diabetes without advanced renal disease. It restores normoglycemia in the vast majority of patients and seems to have a positive impact on late diabetic complications.

Echocardiographic evaluation in type 1 diabetic patients on waiting list for isolated pancreas or kidney-pancreas transplantation

Type 1 diabetic patients may display abnormalities of left ventricular geometry and systolic and diastolic function. Patients on the waiting list for solitary pancreas or kidney-pancreas transplantation were evaluated by Doppler echocardiography to assess left ventricular geometry and systolic and diastolic function, and correlate these parameters with clinical characteristics. We evaluated 78 patients including 45 men with an overall mean age of 39.5 +/- 7.2 years and a disease duration of 24 +/- 9.8 years. Among these 78 patients, 13 showed isolated retinopathy, 9 isolated arterial hypertension, 45 concomitant retinopathy and hypertension and overt nephropathy, while 11 were free of complications. The results of our study showed an increased left ventricular mass and abnormal diastolic function among patients with simultaneous target organ complications and with hypertension, as has been reported in many previous studies. In contrast study patients with no complications showed normal left ventricular structure and function. This finding conflicts with data from several reports in the medical literature in which diastolic impairment was present in type 1 diabetic patients at an early stage of disease and with no evident microvascular and macrovascular complications.

Reducing insulin resistance with metformin: the evidence today

Insulin resistance, defined as the inability of insulin to exert a normal biological action at the level of its target tissues, is one of the principal pathogenetic defects of type 2 diabetes. Metformin, the most widely-prescribed insulin-sensitizing agent in current clinical use, improves blood glucose control mainly by improving insulin-mediated suppression of hepatic glucose production, and by enhancing insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle. Experimental studies show that metformin-mediated improvements in insulin sensitivity may be associated with several mechanisms, including increased insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity, enhanced glycogen synthesis, and an increase in the recruitment and activity of GLUT4 glucose transporters. In adipose tissue, metformin promotes the re-esterification of free fatty acids and inhibits lipolysis, which may indirectly improve insulin sensitivity through reduced lipotoxicity. The improved glycaemia with metformin is not associated with increased circulating levels of insulin, and the risk of hypoglycaemia with metformin is minimal. The therapeutic profile of metformin supports its use for the control of blood glucose, in diabetic patients and for the prevention of diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Moreover, the improvement by metformin of cardiovascular risk factors associated with the dysmetabolic syndrome may account for the significant improvements in macrovascular outcomes observed in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study.

Pancreas transplant alone determines early improvement of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac function in type 1 diabetic patients1

BACKGROUND

The effects of pancreas transplant alone (PTA) on cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) and cardiac function in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients are still unsettled.

METHODS

We studied 13 T1DM patients who received PTA with portal drainage and 11 matched control patients. Parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism and several additional classic CRF were assessed before and up to 6 months posttransplant. Cardiac morphology and function were assessed by Doppler echocardiographic examination.

RESULTS

Insulin independence was promptly achieved and then maintained after PTA. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly lower after transplantation, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations did not change. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values and fibrinogen levels improved significantly. In addition, PTA determined a significant amelioration of several morphologic and functional cardiac indices. None of the measured parameters changed in the control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PTA with portal drainage induces an early improvement of CRF and ameliorates cardiac function in patients with T1DM.

Dissociation between carotid artery lesions and lipid parameters in recipients of successful kidney graft

BACKGROUND

The relationships between lipid levels and atherosclerotic lesions of carotid arteries in kidney graft recipients are still unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated carotid morphology in 53 recipients of functioning renal transplantation, and studied the relationship of carotid artery wall lesions with relevant clinical and laboratory risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The patients were on stable, cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

The main clinical characteristics of patients were: age, 46.5 +/- 10.1 years; males/females, 40/13; body mass index, 25.8 +/- 4.4 kg/m2; duration of transplantation, 43 +/- 52 months. Ultrasonographic scanning of carotid arteries showed the presence of lesions (intimal-media thickness and/or plaque) in 28 patients (52.8%). These recipients differed from patients without carotid lesions in terms of age (50.4 +/- 9.0 vs 42.2 +/- 9.7 years, p < 0.01) and duration of pre-transplant dialysis (4.6 +/- 3.4 vs 2.3 +/- 1.9 years, p < 0.01), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed as for total cholesterol (230 +/- 44 vs 235 +/- 35 mg/dl), LDL-cholesterol (142 +/- 32 vs 143 +/- 30 mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (52 +/- 12 vs 58 +/- 20 mg/dl) and triglycerides (178 +/- 94 vs 167 +/- 89 mg/dl). The percentage of post-transplant diabetes was 3-fold higher in patients with carotid lesions (25 vs 8%). No difference was observed as for the following parameters: body mass index, duration of transplantation, fibrinogen levels, DDimer concentrations, reactive C-protein values, prevalence of hypertension, percentage of smokers vs non-smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the view that carotid artery lesions in kidney graft recipients on stable, cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy may not be related to circulating lipid values.

The biguanide compound metformin prevents desensitization of human pancreatic islets induced by high glucose

Pancreatic islet desensitization by high glucose concentrations is a temporary and reversible state of beta-cell refractoriness to glucose (and possibly other secretagogues), due to repeated or prolonged pre-exposure to increased glucose concentrations. We evaluated whether the oral antidiabetic agent metformin affects this phenomenon in isolated, human pancreatic islets, and whether the possible effects of the biguanide are influenced by the presence of a sulphonylurea, glyburide. Islets prepared from five human pancreases were incubated for 24 h in M199 culture medium containing either 5.5 or 22.2 mmol/l glucose, with or without a therapeutic concentration (2.4 microg/ml) of metformin. Then, the islets were challenged with either 3.3 mmol/l glucose, 16.7 mmol/l glucose, or 3.3 mmol/l glucose + 10 mmol/l arginine, and insulin release was measured. After incubation in the absence of metformin, the human islets exposed to 22.2 mmol/l glucose showed no significant increase in insulin release when challenged with 16.7 mmol/l glucose (confirming that hyperglycemia desensitizes pancreatic beta-cells). In the presence of metformin, the islets fully maintained the ability to significantly increase their insulin release in response to glucose, even when previously exposed to 22.2 mmol/l glucose. No major effect on arginine-induced insulin release was observed, whatever the culture conditions. The protective action of metformin was observed also when glyburide was present in the incubation medium, whereas the sulphonylurea alone did not affect insulin release from the islets previously exposed to high glucose concentrations. These in vitro results suggest that metformin can prevent the desensitization of human pancreatic islets induced by prolonged exposure to increased glucose concentrations.