1
|
Glynn SM, Gaillard S, Stone RL, Fader AN, Beavis AL. Pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A case series. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 53:101374. [PMID: 38633673 PMCID: PMC11021942 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Treatment for recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is clinically challenging as response rates to traditional chemotherapy are low, and recurrence rates are high. Immunotherapy has shown promise for this ovarian cancer (OC) subtype, and tumor molecular testing allows for the identification of a patient population that might benefit most from this treatment. We describe the clinical course and somatic genomic testing of 4 patients who received pembrolizumab for recurrent OCCC concurrent with a combination of bevacizumab and/or cyclophosphamide. Methods All patients with OCCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) within a single health system between 2018 and 2023 (excluding those on clinical trials) were identified via retrospective chart review. Results Four patients were included. The average age at diagnosis was 56.5 years, and the number of prior treatments ranged from 1 to 6. All patients received pembrolizumab combined with either bevacizumab and/or cyclophosphamide. All patients (n = 3) who received pembrolizumab and bevacizumab experienced a partial response. Responses were durable, ranging from 6 to 15 months. Somatic genomic testing results demonstrated microsatellite stability and low tumor mutational burden in all patient tumors, and 3 had AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A gene (ARID1A) mutations. Notably, two patients had treatment-limiting toxicities, one with presumed immune-mediated grade 2 myocarditis, and another with grade 5 hepatitis. Conclusions Pembrolizumab, combined with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, is a promising treatment option for patients with recurrent OCCC, though careful risk assessment and counseling regarding toxicities is necessary to maximize the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen. Prospective studies are needed for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M. Glynn
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Stephanie Gaillard
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Rebecca L. Stone
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Anna L. Beavis
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davis JM, Rushton T, Nsiah F, Stone RL, Beavis AL, Gaillard SL, Dobi A, Fader AN. Long-term disease-free survival with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in a patient with unmeasurable, advanced stage dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 53:101380. [PMID: 38601712 PMCID: PMC11004511 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is a rare, highly aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer associated with poor survival outcomes. Current guidelines recommend treatment of advanced-stage disease with surgical staging or cytoreduction and platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy. Despite these approaches, the achievement of long-term remission or prolonged survival is challenging. Recent Phase III studies demonstrate that the addition of PD-1 inhibitors to standard chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival in patients with measurable, mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and proficient (pMMR) advanced-stage or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. However, the role of PD-1 blockade in the treatment of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma remains unclear, as very few patients with these cancer subtypes were included in the trials. In this case report, we present a patient with dMMR dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, treated with primary surgery to no gross residual disease, followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy and a short course of maintenance pembrolizumab. To date, the patient remains with a prolonged disease-free survival of 61 months, supporting the potential use of PD-1 inhibitors in the upfront treatment of unmeasurable, advanced-stage, dMMR dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy M. Davis
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tullia Rushton
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Felicity Nsiah
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Stone
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anna L. Beavis
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stéphanie L. Gaillard
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alice Dobi
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wethington SL, Rositch AF, Yu R, Bielman M, Topel K, Stone RL, Ferriss JS, Fader AN, Beavis AL. Integrating Social Needs Screening and Resource Referral Into Standard Ambulatory Oncology Care: A Quality Improvement Project. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:566-571. [PMID: 38277618 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We previously implemented paper-based screening for health-related social resource needs (HRSN) in our gynecologic oncology clinic and found that 36% of patients who completed the screening reported HRSN. We identified two primary deficiencies with our process. First, only 52% of patients completed the screening. Second, 37% of patients with needs failed to indicate if they desired resource referral or not. Therefore, we conducted a quality improvement project to integrate screening and referral processes into the electronic medical record (EMR) and routine clinic workflow to achieve at least 90% screening compliance and 90% elicited referral preference. METHODS A multidisciplinary team consisting of physicians, a health outcomes researcher, a computer programmer, project assistants, and the staff of a partner community organization designed and implemented an intervention that screened for HRSN online via the EMR patient platform or in person during visits. The primary outcome was the percentage of eligible patients who completed the HRSN screening (ie, reach). Outcomes were reviewed weekly, and feedback was provided to stakeholders monthly. Iterative changes were incorporated into five successive Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles completed from January 2021 to March 2023. RESULTS Screening compliance increased from the baseline of 52% (paper-based) to 97% in PDSA 4. Completion via the online patient portal increased from 17% in prelaunch to 49% in PDSA 4. Of patients who reported needs, 100% had a documented referral preference. CONCLUSION Compared with paper-based screening, an EMR-integrated HRSN screening and referral system significantly improved reach to patients at a gynecologic oncology clinic. Implementation efforts to expand to other ambulatory clinic settings are in process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L Wethington
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Ruoxi Yu
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marie Bielman
- The Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kristin Topel
- Hopkins Community Connection, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - James Stuart Ferriss
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anna L Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beavis AL, Hirani Z, Rushton T, Rush MC, Fader AN, Yenokyan G, Rositch AF. Overweight and obese women's symptoms, knowledge, and preferences regarding endometrial biopsy for endometrial cancer detection: A threshold technique survey. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 52:101361. [PMID: 38469133 PMCID: PMC10925928 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) in the United States continues to rise, driven mainly by the obesity epidemic. We sought to determine overweight and obese women's cancer risk knowledge and preferences regarding diagnostic endometrial biopsy (EMB) for EC detection. Methods An online survey was administered to overweight and obese women without EC recruited through the electronic medical record's online patient portal. Baseline questions queried gynecologic history, cancer risk knowledge, and factors potentially influencing decision-making for EMB. We used the threshold survey technique to identify the minimum acceptable risk (MAR) threshold at which each respondent would be willing to undergo an EMB to detect EC. Results Of 357 respondents (median age 45 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 38-54); median BMI 39 [IQR: 36.0-44.6]), fewer than half (48.7 %) were aware that obesity is a risk factor for EC, and 10 % considered their risk of EC to be high. Almost half (42 %) of respondents reported MAR thresholds characterized as very low (0-1 %), and these were more common among respondents with higher BMIs. Forty percent identified their weight as a factor influencing their MAR threshold decision, while 76 % identified their perceived personal risk as a factor. Less than half cited immediate risks of the procedure. Conclusion Many patients reported being willing to undergo an EMB at very low risk thresholds for EC. Perceived personal risk is a stronger factor in decision-making than immediate procedural risks. Providers should focus on communicating patients' risk to motivate EMB to detect EC where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L. Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Zishan Hirani
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Stafford, TX, United States
| | - Tullia Rushton
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Mary Catherine Rush
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Gayane Yenokyan
- Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Anne F. Rositch
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fader AN, Ko EM, Pollock BD, Blank SV, Cohn DE, Huh W, Shahin MS, Dowdy SC. An SGO commentary: U.S. News and World Report gynecologic oncology procedural ratings-Do they reflect high-quality care? Gynecol Oncol 2024; 182:188-191. [PMID: 38493022 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda N Fader
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Emily M Ko
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Benjamin D Pollock
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Warner Huh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Mark S Shahin
- Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Willow Grove, PA, United States of America
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Santos ES, Oliver TK, Lacchetti C, Geisel R, Wilfong LS, Fader AN, Eng C. Drug Shortages in Oncology: ASCO Clinical Guidance for Alternative Treatments. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:19-32. [PMID: 37963306 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer clinical guidance on navigating the complexities of treatment planning amid antineoplastic drug shortages. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of oncologists, ethicists, and patient advocates was assembled to provide rapid clinical guidance to help providers navigate appropriate patient care in cases where rationing or alternative therapies must be considered. The groups of content experts developed general principles for resource allocation during shortages and clinical guidance on alternative therapies for specific disease sites. The recommendations are supported by evidence when available. RESULTS A total of 44 volunteers with content expertise formed the Advisory Group that developed general guidance on the prioritization of antineoplastic agents in limited supply. Disease site-specific clinical guidance was then produced by subgroups on the basis of members' specialties and expertise. The majority of alternative treatment options were developed in consideration of cisplatin and carboplatin shortages. All guidance is posted on ASCO's website. RECOMMENDATIONS The prioritization of antineoplastic agents in limited supply should be based on specific goals of the therapy where evidence-based medicine has shown survival outcome and life-extending benefit in both early and advanced stages. Recommendations for specific disease sites are presented. While management options vary according to the disease site, alternatives are presented. For settings in which there are no alternatives with comparable efficacy and safety, it is recommended that patients are referred to an area where the necessary drug is available or can be obtained.Additional information is available at asco.org/drug-shortages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rachel Geisel
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen CCG, Malpani A, Waldram MM, Romanczyk C, Tanner EJ, Fader AN, Scheib SA, Hager GD, Vedula SS. Effect of pre-operative warm-up on trainee intraoperative performance during robot-assisted hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:2751-2758. [PMID: 37449987 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05595-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The objective was to study the effect of immediate pre-operative warm-up using virtual reality simulation on intraoperative robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) performance by gynecology trainees (residents and fellows). METHODS We randomized the first, non-emergent RALH of the day that involved trainees warming up or not warming up. For cases assigned to warm-up, trainees performed a set of exercises on the da Vinci Skills Simulator immediately before the procedure. The supervising attending surgeon, who was not informed whether or not the trainee was assigned to warm-up, assessed the trainee's performance using the Objective Structured Assessment for Technical Skill (OSATS) and the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) immediately after each surgery. RESULTS We randomized 66 cases and analyzed 58 cases (30 warm-up, 28 no warm-up), which involved 21 trainees. Attending surgeons rated trainees similarly irrespective of warm-up randomization with mean (SD) OSATS composite scores of 22.6 (4.3; warm-up) vs 21.8 (3.4; no warm-up) and mean GEARS composite scores of 19.2 (3.8; warm-up) vs 18.8 (3.1; no warm-up). The difference in composite scores between warm-up and no warm-up was 0.34 (95% CI: -1.44, 2.13), and 0.34 (95% CI: -1.22, 1.90) for OSATS and GEARS respectively. Also, we did not observe any significant differences in each of the component/subscale scores within OSATS and GEARS between cases assigned to warm-up and no warm-up. CONCLUSION Performing a brief virtual reality-based warm-up before RALH did not significantly improve the intraoperative performance of the trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Chiung Grace Chen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Anand Malpani
- Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Edward J Tanner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stacey A Scheib
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Gregory D Hager
- Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - S Swaroop Vedula
- Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mao SPH, Desravines N, Zarei S, Viswanathan AN, Fader AN. Combined trastuzumab and radiation therapy for HER2-positive uterine serous carcinoma: A case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 49:101250. [PMID: 37575611 PMCID: PMC10415829 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Overexpression of HER2 in endometrial cancer is associated with poor prognosis, aggressive disease, and resistance to standard therapies. Recent studies have shown that HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, can be effective in treating HER2-positive endometrial cancer in combination with chemotherapy. Currently, the management of advanced-stage HER2-positive uterine serous carcinoma (USC) consists of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab followed by trastuzumab maintenance therapy until disease recurrence or prohibitive toxicity. In the setting of persistent pelvic disease following systemic therapy, consolidation with tumor-directed radiation therapy also offers an opportunity to eradicate residual disease. With the emergence of molecular tumor classifications and systemic therapies (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies), the landscape of adjuvant multi-modality therapy is ever changing and increasingly individualized. Currently, there is no prospective evidence to guide pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab in endometrial cancer, and as a result, no reported toxicity in endometrial cancer patients. In this case report, we present two patients with HER2-positive USC who received multi-agent chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by pelvic radiation therapy and concurrent trastuzumab. Both patients tolerated this multimodal treatment without significant or persistent moderate or severe adverse events. These two cases provide insight into the safety and feasibility of administering radiation therapy with trastuzumab in endometrial cancer in the maintenance phase. Our report suggests that trastuzumab-based therapy may be a promising treatment option for HER2-positive endometrial cancer patients who receive concurrent or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SPH Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - N Desravines
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - S Zarei
- Gynecologic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - AN Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - AN Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nasioudis D, Fernandez ML, Wong N, Powell DJ, Mills GB, Westin S, Fader AN, Carey MS, Simpkins F. The spectrum of MAPK-ERK pathway genomic alterations in gynecologic malignancies: Opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:86-94. [PMID: 37657193 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence of MAPK/ERK pathway genomic alterations among patients with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS We accessed the American Association of Cancer Research Genomics Evidence of Neoplasia Information Exchange publicly available dataset (v13.0). Patients with malignant tumors of the ovary, uterus, and cervix were identified. Following stratification by tumor site and histology, we examined the prevalence of MAPK/ERK pathway gene alterations (somatic mutation, and/or structural chromosome alterations). We included the following RAS-MAPK pathway genes known to be implicated in the dysregulation of the pathway; KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HRAS, MAP2K1, RAF1, PTPN11, NF1, and ARAF. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, were utilized to determine pathogenic gene alterations. RESULTS We identified a total of 10,233 patients with gynecologic malignancies; 48.2% (n = 4937) with ovarian, 45.2% (n = 4621) with uterine and 6.6% (n = 675) with cervical cancer respectively. The overall incidence of MAPK pathway gene alterations was 21%; the most commonly altered gene was KRAS (13%), followed by NF1 (7%), NRAS (1.3%), and BRAF (1.2%). The highest incidence was observed among patients with mucinous ovarian (71%), low-grade serous ovarian (48%), endometrioid ovarian (37%), and endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (34%). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 1 in 5 patients with a gynecologic tumor harbor a MAPK/ERK pathway genomic alteration. Novel treatment strategies capitalizing on these alterations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Nasioudis
- Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marta Llaurado Fernandez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nelson Wong
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer, BC, Canada
| | - Daniel J Powell
- Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Shannon Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark S Carey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Fiona Simpkins
- Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grisham RN, Slomovitz BM, Andrews N, Banerjee S, Brown J, Carey MS, Chui H, Coleman RL, Fader AN, Gaillard S, Gourley C, Sood AK, Monk BJ, Moore KN, Ray-Coquard I, Shih IM, Westin SN, Wong KK, Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1331-1344. [PMID: 37591609 PMCID: PMC10511962 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Compared with high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is a less frequent epithelial ovarian cancer type that is poorly sensitive to chemotherapy and affects younger women, many of whom endure years of ineffective treatments and poor quality of life. The pathogenesis of this disease and its management remain incompletely understood. However, recent advances in the molecular characterization of the disease and identification of novel targeted therapies with activity in low-grade serous carcinoma offer the promise of improved outcomes. To update clinicians regarding recent scientific and clinical trial advancements and discuss unanswered questions related to low-grade serous carcinoma diagnosis and treatment, a panel of experts convened for a workshop in October 2022 to develop a consensus document addressing pathology, translational research, epidemiology and risk, clinical management, and ongoing research. In addition, the patient perspective was discussed. The recommendations developed by this expert panel-presented in this consensus document-will guide practitioners in all settings regarding the clinical management of women with low-grade serous carcinoma and discuss future opportunities to improve research and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA
- Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Nicole Andrews
- STAAR Ovarian Cancer Foundation, Western Springs, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jubilee Brown
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Wake Forest University, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark S Carey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Herman Chui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie Gaillard
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Honor Health, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kwong-Kwok Wong
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Desjardins MR, Desravines N, Fader AN, Wethington SL, Curriero FC. Geographic Disparities in Potential Accessibility to Gynecologic Oncologists in the United States From 2001 to 2020. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:688-697. [PMID: 37535956 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To use a spatial modeling approach to capture potential disparities of gynecologic oncologist accessibility in the United States at the county level between 2001 and 2020. METHODS Physician registries identified the 2001-2020 gynecologic oncology workforce and were aggregated to each county. The at-risk cohort (women aged 18 years or older) was stratified by race and ethnicity and rurality demographics. We computed the distance from at-risk women to physicians. Relative access scores were computed by a spatial model for each contiguous county. Access scores were compared across urban or rural status and racial and ethnic groups. RESULTS Between 2001 and 2020, the gynecologic oncologist workforce increased. By 2020, there were 1,178 active physicians and 98.3% practiced in urban areas (37.3% of all counties). Geographic disparities were identified, with 1.09 physicians per 100,000 women in urban areas compared with 0.1 physicians per 100,000 women in rural areas. In total, 2,862 counties (57.4 million at-risk women) lacked an active physician. Additionally, there was no increase in rural physicians, with only 1.7% practicing in rural areas in 2016-2020 relative to 2.2% in 2001-2005 ( P =.35). Women in racial and ethnic minority populations, such as American Indian or Alaska Native and Hispanic women, exhibited the lowest level of access to physicians across all time periods. For example, 23.7% of American Indian or Alaska Native women did not have access to a physician within 100 miles between 2016 and 2020, which did not improve over time. Non-Hispanic Black women experienced an increase in relative accessibility, with a 26.2% increase by 2016-2020. However, Asian or Pacific Islander women exhibited significantly better access than non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaska Native women across all time periods. CONCLUSION Although the U.S. gynecologic oncologist workforce increased steadily over 20 years, this has not translated into evidence of improved access for many women from rural and underrepresented areas. However, health care utilization and cancer outcomes may not be influenced only by distance and availability. Policies and pipeline programs are needed to address these inequities in gynecologic cancer care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ge J, Fader AN, Dudley JC. Early detection of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:A1-A2. [PMID: 37356825 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxin Ge
- Ludwig Center, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan C Dudley
- Ludwig Center, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith AJB, Puttaraju T, Applebaum J, Fader AN. Long-term impact of the Affordable Care Act's dependent coverage mandate on young women with gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 175:121-127. [PMID: 37356312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The dependent coverage mandate in the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) allows young adults to stay on a parent's private insurance through age 26. While this mandate is associated with gains in insurance and early-stage cancer diagnosis, its long-term impact on survival is unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare insurance coverage, stage at diagnosis, and overall survival in patients with gynecologic cancer before and after the ACA's dependent coverage mandate. METHODS Using difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis, we conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes before and after the implementation of the ACA's dependent coverage mandate in young patients with gynecologic cancer, ages 18-26 years (exposure group) to patients ages 27-35 (control group). We analyzed insurance coverage, stage at diagnosis, and 1, 2, and 3-year overall survival, adjusted for age and comorbidities, utilizing the 2004-2017 National Cancer Database. IRB exemption was obtained. RESULTS A total of 3553 cases pre-reform and 4535 cases post-reform were identified for patients 18-26 years compared to 14,420 pre-reform and 19,821 post-reform for patients age 27-35. The ACA's dependent coverage mandate was associated with significant gains in insurance (DiD 2%, 95% CI 0.6-3.5) and early-stage diagnosis (3.1%, 95% CI 0.6-5.7). The ACA's dependent coverage mandate was associated with significant gains in 3-year survival (2.4%, 95% CI 0.4-4.3) and non-significant gains in 1 and 2-year survival. CONCLUSION The ACA's dependent coverage mandate is associated with improvements in early-stage diagnosis and survival for young patients with gynecologic cancer. Maintaining insurance gains-and expanding to the remaining uninsured-are critical for the health of young patients with gynecologic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | - Jeremy Applebaum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, Moore RG, Hope JM, Musa FB, Mannel R, Shahin MS, Cantuaria GH, Girda E, Mathews C, Kavecansky J, Leath CA, Gien LT, Hinchcliff EM, Lele SB, Landrum LM, Backes F, O'Cearbhaill RE, Al Baghdadi T, Hill EK, Thaker PH, John VS, Welch S, Fader AN, Powell MA, Aghajanian C. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2159-2170. [PMID: 36972022 PMCID: PMC10351614 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2302312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard first-line chemotherapy for endometrial cancer is paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The benefit of adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy remains unclear. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 trial, we assigned 816 patients with measurable disease (stage III or IVA) or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab or placebo along with combination therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The administration of pembrolizumab or placebo was planned in 6 cycles every 3 weeks, followed by up to 14 maintenance cycles every 6 weeks. The patients were stratified into two cohorts according to whether they had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease. Previous adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted if the treatment-free interval was at least 12 months. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the two cohorts. Interim analyses were scheduled to be triggered after the occurrence of at least 84 events of death or progression in the dMMR cohort and at least 196 events in the pMMR cohort. RESULTS In the 12-month analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival in the dMMR cohort were 74% in the pembrolizumab group and 38% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.48; P<0.001), a 70% difference in relative risk. In the pMMR cohort, median progression-free survival was 13.1 months with pembrolizumab and 8.7 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). Adverse events were as expected for pembrolizumab and combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than with chemotherapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; NRG-GY018 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03914612.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramez N Eskander
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Michael W Sill
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Lindsey Beffa
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Richard G Moore
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Joanie M Hope
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Fernanda B Musa
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Robert Mannel
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Mark S Shahin
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Guilherme H Cantuaria
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Eugenia Girda
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Cara Mathews
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Juraj Kavecansky
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Charles A Leath
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Lilian T Gien
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Emily M Hinchcliff
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Shashikant B Lele
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Lisa M Landrum
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Floor Backes
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Tareq Al Baghdadi
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Emily K Hill
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Premal H Thaker
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Veena S John
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Stephen Welch
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Amanda N Fader
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Matthew A Powell
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (R.N.E.), and the Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Antioch Medical Center, Antioch (J.K.) - both in California; the Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (M.W.S., S.B.L.), the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester (R.G.M.), the Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (R.E.O., C.A.), and the Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park (V.S.J.) - all in New York; the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (L.B.), and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus (F.B.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Alaska Women's Cancer Care, and Providence Alaska Cancer Center, Anchorage (J.M.H.); the Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Swedish Medical Center-First Hill, Seattle (F.B.M.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (R.M.); Jefferson Abington Hospital, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA (M.S.S.); Georgia NCORP, Atlanta (G.H.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick (E.G.); Women and Infants Hospital, Legoretta Cancer Center, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (C.M.); the University of Alabama at Birmingham-Deep South Research Consortium, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham (C.A.L.); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (L.T.G.), and the London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON (S.W.) - both in Canada; Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago (E.M.H.); the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (L.M.L.); the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, NCORP, Trinity Health IHA Medical Group, Ypsilanti (T.A.B.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (E.K.H.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (P.H.T., M.A.P.); and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (A.N.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Beavis AL, Blechter B, Najjar O, Fader AN, Katebi Kashi P, Rositch AF. Identifying women 45 years and younger at elevated risk for endometrial hyperplasia or cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:98-105. [PMID: 37172411 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of, and identify risk factors associated with, endometrial hyperplasia and/or cancer (EH/EC) in patients ≤45 years old undergoing endometrial sampling for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients 18-45 years old with AUB who underwent endometrial sampling between 2016 and 2019 within a US-based multi-hospital system using billing code queries. We used multivariable Poisson regression to identify factors associated with EH/EC and calculated prevalence stratified by these factors. We estimated predicted probabilities within combinations of characteristics in order to examine the range of risk in this population. RESULTS Among 3175 patients, median age was 39 years (interquartile range [IQR]:35-43) and BMI was 29.7 kg/m2 (IQR: 24.2-36.9). Thirty-nine percent were non-Hispanic White, 41% non-Hispanic Black, 9% Hispanic, and 11% Asian/Other/Unknown. BMI and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) were associated with higher EH/EC risk; non-Hispanic Black race was associated with lower risk. EH/EC prevalence ranged from 2% in BMI <25 to 16% in BMI ≥50 kg/m2 (p-trend <0.001). These prevalence estimates differed by race/ethnicity with the lowest estimates in non-Hispanic Black patients (0.5% BMI <25 vs. 9% BMI ≥50) and highest in Hispanic patients (1.5% BMI <25 vs. 33% BMI ≥50). Accounting for combinations of risk factors, predicted probabilities were highest - 34-36% - among patients with PCOS, diabetes, BMI ≥50, and Hispanic or Asian/Other/Unknown race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS When accounting for combinations of key risk factors, risk of EH/EC in patients ≤45 years old with AUB ranges widely; the more nuanced estimates of risk presented here could help inform clinical decision-making about endometrial sampling in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Batel Blechter
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Omar Najjar
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Payam Katebi Kashi
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Anne F Rositch
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rushton T, Satin AJ, Fader AN. Engendered Perceptions About Surgeon Gender and Patient Outcomes After Cesarean Delivery. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:282-283. [PMID: 36696122 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tullia Rushton
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrew J Satin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beavis AL, Fader AN. Surveillance Strategies in Endometrial Cancer Care: Why Less Represents Progress. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3790-3795. [PMID: 36201708 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L Beavis
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Glaser GE, Lara OD, Pothuri B, Grimaldi CG, Prescott LS, Mastroyannis SA, Kim S, ElNaggar AC, Torres D, Conrad LB, McGree M, Weaver A, Huh WK, Cohn DE, Yamada SD, Fader AN. Clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and gynecologic cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology COVID-19 and gynecologic cancer registry study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:146-151. [PMID: 36154761 PMCID: PMC9499739 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with gynecologic malignancies may have varied responses to COVID-19 infection. We aimed to describe clinical courses, treatment changes, and short-term clinical outcomes for gynecologic oncology patients with concurrent COVID-19 in the United States. METHODS The Society of Gynecologic Oncology COVID-19 and Gynecologic Cancer Registry was created to capture clinical courses of gynecologic oncology patients with COVID-19. Logistic regression models were employed to evaluate factors for an association with hospitalization and death, respectively, within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS Data were available for 348 patients across 7 institutions. At COVID-19 diagnosis, 125 patients (36%) had active malignancy. Delay (n = 88) or discontinuation (n = 10) of treatment due to COVID-19 infection occurred in 28% with those on chemotherapy (53/88) or recently receiving surgery (32/88) most frequently delayed. In addition to age, performance status, diabetes, and specific COVID symptoms, both non-White race (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.93, 95% CI 2.06-7.50) and active malignancy (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.30-4.20) were associated with an increased odds of hospitalization. Eight percent of hospitalized patients (8/101) died of COVID-19 complications and 5% (17/348) of the entire cohort died within 30 days after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Gynecologic oncology patients diagnosed with COVID-19 are at risk for hospitalization, delay of anti-cancer treatments, and death. One in 20 gynecologic oncology patients with COVID-19 died within 30 days after diagnosis. Racial disparities exist in patient hospitalizations for COVID-19, a surrogate of disease severity. Additional studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes and the impact of race.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen E Glaser
- Mayo Clinic Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States of America.
| | - Olivia D Lara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Kim
- University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Adam C ElNaggar
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Memphis, TN, United States of America
| | | | - Lesley B Conrad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States of America
| | - Michaela McGree
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Amy Weaver
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Warner K Huh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Ohio State University, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, United States of America
| | - S Diane Yamada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Medicine, United States of America
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Frost AS, Smith AJB, Fader AN, Wethington SL. Modifiable risk factors associated with long-term survival in women with serous ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Database study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:769-780. [PMID: 35459709 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify patient, clinical and hospital factors associated with long-term survival (≥10 years) in women with serous ovarian cancer. METHODS This National Cancer Database cohort study included women with stage II-IV serous ovarian cancer. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association of long-term survival with patient (race, insurance, location, household income, education, distance traveled), clinical (age, comorbidities, stage, grade, primary treatment) and hospital factors (region, institution, hospital volume ≥20). RESULTS Of the 4640 women identified, 12% (n=561) experienced long-term survival. Median overall survival was 41 months (95% CI 39 to 42). The odds of long-term survival were lower for women with public or no insurance (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.92), age ≥75 years (0.33, 0.22 to 0.50), any comorbidities (0.70, 0.54 to 0.92), higher stage (stage III: 0.31, 0.25 to 0.41; stage IV: 0.16, 0.12 to 0.22), and moderately/poorly differentiated, undifferentiated, or tumors of unknown grade (moderately/poorly differentiated: 0.30, 0.20 to 0.47; undifferentiated: 0.28, 0.17 to 0.47; unknown: 0.30, 0.18 to 0.50). The odds of long-term survival among women who were publicly insured were lower with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (0.13, 0.04 to 0.044) and higher with optimal cytoreduction (2.24, 1.49 to 3.36). Among women who were privately insured, the odds of long-term survival were higher with optimal cytoreduction (1.99, 1.46 to 2.70) and unaffected by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS While immutable clinical factors such as age, stage, and grade are associated with long-term survival in women with serous ovarian cancer, modifiable factors, such as insurance type, optimal cytoreductive status, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide an opportunity for targeted improvement in care with potential to affect long-term patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Sophia Frost
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie L Wethington
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liang AL, Katebi Kashi P, Hopkins M, Beavis A, Gaillard S, Shih IM, Fader AN. Progestin and aromatase inhibitor therapy in recurrent, estrogen/progestin receptor positive uterine carcinosarcoma: A case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 38:100877. [PMID: 34926758 PMCID: PMC8651896 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L. Liang
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Payam Katebi Kashi
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Mark Hopkins
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Anna Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Stephanie Gaillard
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
- Corresponding author at: 600 N Wolfe St, Phipps Bldg, Rm 287, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Levinson K, Beavis AL, Purdy C, Rositch AF, Viswanathan A, Wolfson AH, Kelly MG, Tewari KS, McNally L, Guntupalli SR, Ragab O, Lee YC, Miller DS, Huh WK, Wilkinson KJ, Spirtos NM, Le LV, Casablanca Y, Holman LL, Waggoner SE, Fader AN. Corrigendum to "Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis" [Gynecologic Oncology 162 (2021) 532-538]. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:616-617. [PMID: 34654574 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Levinson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Anna L Beavis
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Christopher Purdy
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Anne F Rositch
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Akila Viswanathan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Aaron H Wolfson
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Michael G Kelly
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | | | - Leah McNally
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States
| | | | - Omar Ragab
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Yi-Chun Lee
- SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - David S Miller
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9032, United States
| | - Warner K Huh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Kelly J Wilkinson
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| | | | - Linda Van Le
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | - Laura L Holman
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, 800 Northeast Tenth St., Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | | | - Amanda N Fader
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tymon-Rosario J, Siegel ER, Bellone S, Harold J, Adjei N, Zeybek B, Mauricio D, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Ratner E, Clark M, Andikyan V, Huang GS, Azodi M, Schwartz PE, Fader AN, Santin AD. Trastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:93-99. [PMID: 34372971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Due to previously reported trastuzumab safety concerns and the scant data available in endometrial cancer patients, we sought to assess the safety, tolerability and toxicity profile of trastuzumab in patients with advanced/recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC) that overexpress HER2/neu in our multicenter randomized phase II trial. METHODS Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) for 6 cycles ± trastuzumab (T) with the experimental arm continuing to receive single agent trastuzumab maintenance treatment until disease progression/toxicity. Progression-free-survival was the primary endpoint; overall-survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment arms. RESULTS There were 28 patients in the C/P arm and 32 patients in the experimental (C/P + T) arm. Fifty-eight patients (97%) experienced 977 treatment-related AEs of which 875 (89.6%) were low-grade (grade 1-2) and 102 (10.4%) were high-grade (grade 3-5). The mean ± standard deviation of AEs per patient was 15.5 ± 16.3 in the C/P arm and 17.0 ± 16.0 in the C/P + T arm. Gastrointestinal AEs were the most common in both arms (n = 155, 15.7%) of which 94.2% were low-grade (n = 146). Importantly, no significant difference between treatment arms was detected in any system-organ class of AE including cardiac AE. Five (17%) of 29 patients who received prolonged trastuzumab maintenance therapy had no sign of cumulative toxicity after an average (range) of 5.1 (4.2-6.3) years. CONCLUSIONS Trastuzumab appears to be safe and has a manageable toxicity profile both when used in combination with chemotherapy and when used for single agent maintenance in patients with HER2/neu positive USC. This safety profile is reassuring given the proven efficacy of trastuzumab in advanced/recurrent HER2/neu positive USC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Eric R Siegel
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Stefania Bellone
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Justin Harold
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Naomi Adjei
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Burak Zeybek
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Dennis Mauricio
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gary Altwerger
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gulden Menderes
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Elena Ratner
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Mitchell Clark
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Vaagn Andikyan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gloria S Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Masoud Azodi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Peter E Schwartz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | | | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Levinson K, Beavis AL, Purdy C, Rositch AF, Viswanathan A, Wolfson AH, Kelly MG, Tewari KS, McNally L, Guntupalli SR, Ragab O, Lee YC, Miller DS, Huh WK, Wilkinson KJ, Spirtos NM, Van Le L, Casablanca Y, Holman LL, Waggoner SE, Fader AN. Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:532-538. [PMID: 34217544 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Sedlis criteria define risk factors for recurrence warranting post-hysterectomy radiation for early-stage cervical cancer; however, these factors were defined for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at an estimated recurrence risk of ≥30%. Our study evaluates and compares risk factors for recurrence for cervical SCC compared with adenocarcinoma (AC) and develops histology-specific nomograms to estimate risk of recurrence and guide adjuvant treatment. METHODS We performed an ancillary analysis of GOG 49, 92, and 141, and included stage I patients who were surgically managed and received no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate independent risk factors for recurrence by histology and to generate prognostic histology-specific nomograms for 3-year recurrence risk. RESULTS We identified 715 patients with SCC and 105 with AC; 20% with SCC and 17% with AC recurred. For SCC, lymphvascular space invasion (LVSI: HR 1.58, CI 1.12-2.22), tumor size (TS ≥4 cm: HR 2.67, CI 1.67-4.29), and depth of invasion (DOI; middle 1/3, HR 4.31, CI 1.81-10.26; deep 1/3, HR 7.05, CI 2.99-16.64) were associated with recurrence. For AC, only TS ≥4 cm, was associated with recurrence (HR 4.69, CI 1.25-17.63). For both histologies, there was an interaction effect between TS and LVSI. For those with SCC, DOI was most associated with recurrence (16% risk); for AC, TS conferred a 15% risk with negative LVSI versus a 25% risk with positive LVSI. CONCLUSIONS Current treatment standards are based on the Sedlis criteria, specifically derived from data on SCC. However, risk factors for recurrence differ for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Histology-specific nomograms accurately and linearly represent risk of recurrence for both SCC and AC tumors and may provide a more contemporary and tailored tool for clinicians to base adjuvant treatment recommendations to their patients with cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Levinson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Anna L Beavis
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Christopher Purdy
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
| | - Anne F Rositch
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Akila Viswanathan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Aaron H Wolfson
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, United States of America.
| | - Michael G Kelly
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
| | | | - Leah McNally
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | | | - Omar Ragab
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| | - Yi-Chun Lee
- SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America.
| | - David S Miller
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9032, United States of America.
| | - Warner K Huh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
| | - Kelly J Wilkinson
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States of America.
| | | | - Linda Van Le
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Walter Reed National Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
| | - Laura L Holman
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, 800 Northeast Tenth St., Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
| | - Steven E Waggoner
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ferriss JS, Erickson BK, Shih IM, Fader AN. Uterine serous carcinoma: key advances and novel treatment approaches. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1165-1174. [PMID: 34210768 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence and mortality rates from endometrial cancer continue to increase worldwide, while rates in most other cancers have either plateaued or declined considerably. Uterine serous carcinoma represents a fraction of all endometrial malignancies each year, yet this histology is responsible for nearly 40% of all endometrial cancer-related deaths. These deaths disproportionately affect black women, who have higher rates of advanced disease at diagnosis. Molecular genetic analyses reveal major alterations including TP53 mutation, PIK3CA mutation/amplification, ERBB2 amplification, CCNE1 amplification, FBXW7 mutation/deletion, PPP2R1A mutation, and somatic mutations involving homologous recombination genes. Clinical risk factors for uterine serous carcinoma include advancing age, a history of breast cancer, tamoxifen usage, and the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Recent advances in our understanding of uterine serous carcinoma molecular drivers have led to development of targeted therapeutics that promise improved outcomes for patients. Overexpression or amplification of HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma carries a poor prognosis; yet this actionable target has led to the incorporation of several anti-HER2 therapies, including trastuzumab which, when added to conventional chemotherapy, is associated with improved survival for women with advanced and recurrent HER2-positive disease. The combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is also a promising targeted treatment strategy for women with uterine serous carcinoma, with a recent phase II study suggesting a 50% response rate in women with recurrent disease. Several trials examining additional targeted agents are ongoing. Despite years of stalled progress, meaningful, tailored treatment options are emerging for patients with this uncommon and biologically aggressive endometrial cancer subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Stuart Ferriss
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Britt K Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- TeLinde Gynecologic Pathology Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sisodia RC, Dewdney SB, Fader AN, Wethington SL, Melamed A, Von Gruenigen VE, Zivanovic O, Carter J, Cohn DE, Huh W, Wenzel L, Doll K, Cella D, Dowdy SC. Patient reported outcomes measures in gynecologic oncology: A primer for clinical use, part I. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 158:194-200. [PMID: 32580886 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, United States of America.
| | - Summer B Dewdney
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Stephanie L Wethington
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Vivian E Von Gruenigen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, United States of America
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10065, United States of America
| | - Jeanne Carter
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10065, United States of America
| | - David E Cohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America
| | - Warner Huh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University and Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Lari Wenzel
- Universtiy of California, Irvine, United States of America
| | - Kemi Doll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, United States of America
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Walsh EM, Xing D, Lippitt MH, Fader AN, Wethington SL, Meyer CF, Gaillard SL. Molecular Tumor Board Guides Successful Treatment of a Rare, Locally Aggressive, Uterine Mesenchymal Neoplasm. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.20.00189. [PMID: 34250413 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine M Walsh
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.,Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deyin Xing
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Melissa H Lippitt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.,NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Stephanie L Wethington
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christian F Meyer
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Stephanie L Gaillard
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hazell SZ, Fader AN, Viswanathan AN. Porphyria cutanea tarda exacerbation as a paraneoplastic syndrome in vaginal cancer resolved with chemoradiation. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 35:100682. [PMID: 33426257 PMCID: PMC7779318 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Porphyria Cutanea Tarda (PCT) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome. The effects of therapeutic ionizing radiation in patients with PCT are not well understood. We report the case of a 55 year-old woman with a past medical history significant for kidney transplant with rejection and removal on hemodialysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, porphyria cutanea tarda, undifferentiated connective tissue disease probably systemic lupus, and hepatitis C, who underwent curative chemoradiation treatment for a recurrent vaginal squamous cell carcinoma. There was no increased acute toxicity and active porphyria cutanea tarda improved over the course of radiation treatment and fully resolved within 1 year. However, there was significant myofibrotic late toxicity within the treated region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Z Hazell
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 401 N Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Phipps 287, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 401 N Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Miao D, Fader AN. Surgical Clinical Trials in Gynecology: Rare, Challenging but Desperately Needed. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:379-383. [PMID: 33253959 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Miao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (all authors)
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (all authors)..
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li L, Yue P, Song Q, Yen TT, Asaka S, Wang TL, Beavis AL, Fader AN, Jiao Y, Yuan G, Shih IM, Song Y. Genome-wide mutation analysis in precancerous lesions of endometrial carcinoma. J Pathol 2020; 253:119-128. [PMID: 33016334 DOI: 10.1002/path.5566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Clinicopathological evidence supports endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia as the precursor of uterine endometrioid carcinoma (EC), the most common gynecologic malignancy. However, the pathogenic progression from AH to EC remains unclear. Here, we employed whole-exome sequencing to identify somatic mutations and copy number changes in micro-dissected lesions from 30 pairs of newly diagnosed AH and EC. We found that all but one pair of AHs shared the same DNA mismatch repair status as their corresponding ECs. The percentage of common mutations between AH lesions and corresponding ECs varied significantly, ranging from 0.1% to 82%. Microsatellite stable AHs had fewer cancer driver mutations than ECs (5 versus 7, p = 0.017), but among microsatellite unstable AHs and ECs there was no difference in mutational numbers (36 versus 38, p = 0.65). As compared to AH specimens, 19 (79%) of 24 microsatellite stable EC tumors gained new cancer driver mutations, most of which involved PTEN, ARID1A, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, or CHD4. Our results suggest that some AH lesions are the immediate precursor of ECs, and progression depends on acquisition of additional cancer driver mutations. However, a complex clonal relationship between AH and EC can also be appreciated, as in some cases both lesions diverge very early or arise independently, thus co-developing with distinct genetic trajectories. Our genome-wide profile of mutations in AH and EC shines new light on the molecular landscape of tumor progression. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihong Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.,Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pinli Yue
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Qianqian Song
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Ting-Tai Yen
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shiho Asaka
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anna L Beavis
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yuchen Jiao
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Guangwen Yuan
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yan Song
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Beavis AL, Najjar O, Cheskin LJ, Mangal R, Rositch AF, Langham G, Fader AN. Prevalence of endometrial cancer symptoms among overweight and obese women presenting to a multidisciplinary weight management center. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2020; 34:100643. [PMID: 32995455 PMCID: PMC7502818 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
44% of overweight or obese women reported abnormal bleeding symptoms associated with endometrial cancer (EC). Many obese women have not talked to their providers about these symptoms. Gynecologists should collaborate with providers of obese women to facilitate prevention and early detection of EC.
Endometrial cancer rates are rising in parallel with the obesity epidemic. We aimed to determine the prevalence of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer (EH/EC) bleeding symptoms among at-risk women. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of overweight and obese women at a multidisciplinary weight management center who had completed a gynecologic/menstrual history questionnaire from May 2018 to October 2019. The primary outcome of any EH/EC symptom was defined as follows: in premenopausal women, any recent abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); in postmenopausal women: any bleeding/discharge. The prevalence of EH/EC symptoms was compared by menopausal status using Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariable regression identified independent factors associated with having EH/EC symptoms. A total of 103 women were included, and 4 (4%) had a history of EH/EC. Of the 84 (n = 82%) of women with no prior hysterectomy, 57% (n = 33/58) of premenopausal women reported any EH/EC symptom compared to 15% (n = 15/26) of postmenopausal women (p < 0.001). Two-thirds of symptomatic premenopausal women had two or more symptoms, most commonly heavy menses (49% (n = 25/51)) and irregular periods (39% (n = 17/44)). Sixty percent (n = 20/33) had discussed these with a gynecologist, and one third had undergone an endometrial biopsy. A history of polycystic ovarian syndrome (RR:1.72, 95% CI 1.24–2.38) was associated with EH/EC symptoms, while being postmenopausal was not (RR:0.32, 95%CI: 0.12–0.87). We demonstrate that EH/EC bleeding symptoms are prevalent in this at-risk population, but frequently are not discussed with gynecologists. Providers who care for obese women should ask about EH/EC symptoms, and provide prompt referrals to facilitate prevention and early detection of this cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L. Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Corresponding author at: 600 North Wolfe St, Phipps 281, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Omar Najjar
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lawrence J. Cheskin
- Department of Nutrition and Food Services, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | | | - Anne F. Rositch
- Department Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Geri Langham
- Meharry Medical College School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stone R, Carey E, Fader AN, Fitzgerald J, Hammons L, Nensi A, Park AJ, Ricci S, Rosenfield R, Scheib S, Weston E. Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:179-203. [PMID: 32827721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Stone
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs. Stone, Fader, and Weston).
| | - Erin Carey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Dr. Carey)
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs. Stone, Fader, and Weston)
| | - Jocelyn Fitzgerald
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr. Fitzgerald)
| | - Lee Hammons
- Allegheny Women's Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr. Hammons)
| | - Alysha Nensi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr. Nensi)
| | - Amy J Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs. Park and Ricci)
| | - Stephanie Ricci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs. Park and Ricci)
| | | | - Stacey Scheib
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana (Dr. Scheib)
| | - Erica Weston
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs. Stone, Fader, and Weston)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Son J, Chambers LM, Carr C, Michener CM, Yao M, Beavis A, Yen TT, Stone RL, Wethington SL, Fader AN, Burkett WC, Richardson DL, Staley AS, Ahn S, Gehrig PA, Torres D, Dowdy SC, Sullivan MW, Modesitt SC, Watson C, Veade A, Ehrisman J, Havrilesky L, Secord AA, Loreen A, Griffin K, Jackson A, Viswanathan A, Ricci S. Adjuvant treatment improves overall survival in women with high-intermediate risk early-stage endometrial cancer with lymphovascular space invasion. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1738-1747. [PMID: 32771986 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy in early-stage endometrial cancer has not shown a clear overall survival benefit, and hence, patient selection remains crucial. OBJECTIVE To determine whether women with high-intermediate risk, early-stage endometrial cancer with lymphovascular space invasion particularly benefit from adjuvant treatment in improving oncologic outcomes. METHODS A multi-center retrospective study was conducted in women with stage IA, IB, and II endometrial cancer with lymphovascular space invasion who met criteria for high-intermediate risk by Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 99. Patients were stratified by the type of adjuvant treatment received. Clinical and pathologic features were abstracted. Progression-free and overall survival were evaluated using multivariable analysis. RESULTS 405 patients were included with the median age of 67 years (range 27-92, IQR 59-73). 75.0% of the patients had full staging with lymphadenectomy, and 8.6% had sentinel lymph node biopsy (total 83.6%). After surgery, 24.9% of the patients underwent observation and 75.1% received adjuvant therapy, which included external beam radiation therapy (15.1%), vaginal brachytherapy (45.4%), and combined brachytherapy + chemotherapy (19.1%). Overall, adjuvant treatment resulted in improved oncologic outcomes for both 5-year progression-free survival (77.2% vs 69.6%, HR 0.55, p=0.01) and overall survival (81.5% vs 60.2%, HR 0.42, p<0.001). After adjusting for stage, grade 2/3, and age, improved progression-free survival and overall survival were observed for the following adjuvant subgroups compared with observation: external beam radiation (overall survival HR 0.47, p=0.047, progression-free survival not significant), vaginal brachytherapy (overall survival HR 0.35, p<0.001; progression-free survival HR 0.42, p=0.003), and brachytherapy + chemotherapy (overall survival HR 0.30 p=0.002; progression-free survival HR 0.35, p=0.006). Compared with vaginal brachytherapy alone, external beam radiation or the addition of chemotherapy did not further improve progression-free survival (p=0.80, p=0.65, respectively) or overall survival (p=0.47, p=0.74, respectively). CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy improves both progression-free survival and overall survival in women with early-stage endometrial cancer meeting high-intermediate risk criteria with lymphovascular space invasion. External beam radiation or adding chemotherapy did not confer additional survival advantage compared with vaginal brachytherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Son
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura M Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Caitlin Carr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Chad M Michener
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Meng Yao
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anna Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ting-Tai Yen
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie L Wethington
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wesley C Burkett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Debra L Richardson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Allison S Staley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susie Ahn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paola A Gehrig
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diogo Torres
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mackenzie W Sullivan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Susan C Modesitt
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Catherine Watson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Veade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jessie Ehrisman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amy Loreen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Griffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Amanda Jackson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Akila Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephanie Ricci
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Erickson BK, Najjar O, Damast S, Blakaj A, Tymon-Rosario J, Shahi M, Santin A, Klein M, Dolan M, Cimino-Mathews A, Buza N, Ferriss JS, Stone RL, Khalifa M, Fader AN. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:17-22. [PMID: 32709539 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has emerged as an important prognostic and therapeutic target in advanced stage and recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC). The significance of tumoral HER2 expression in early-stage disease has not been established. METHODS This multi-center cohort study included women with stage I USC treated from 2000 to 2019. Demographic, treatment, recurrence, and survival data were collected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for HER2 and scored 0-3+. Equivocal IHC results (2+) were further tested with fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 positivity was defined as 3+ IHC or FISH positive. RESULTS One hundred sixty-nine patients with stage I USC were tested for HER2; 26% were HER2-positive. There were no significant differences in age, race, stage, adjuvant therapy, or follow-up duration between the HER2-positive and negative cohorts. Presence of lymph-vascular space invasion was correlated with HER2-positive tumors (p = .003). After a median follow-up of 50 months, there were 43 (25.4%) recurrences. There were significantly more recurrences in the HER2-positive cohort (50.0% vs 16.8%, p < .001). HER2 positive tumors were associated with worse progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < .001 and p = .024). On multivariate analysis, HER2 positive tumors were associated with inferior PFS (aHR 3.50, 95%CI 1.84-6.67; p < .001) and OS (aHR 2.00, 95%CI 1.04-3.88; p = .039) compared to HER2-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS Given its significant association with worse recurrence and survival outcomes, HER2 positivity appears to be a prognostic biomarker in women with stage I uterine serous carcinoma. These data provide support for clinical trials with anti-HER2-directed therapy in early-stage disease.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
- Biomarkers, Tumor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/diagnosis
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Hysterectomy
- Immunohistochemistry
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Progression-Free Survival
- Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data
- United States/epidemiology
- Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Uterine Neoplasms/mortality
- Uterine Neoplasms/pathology
- Uterine Neoplasms/therapy
- Uterus/pathology
- Uterus/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt K Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Omar Najjar
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shari Damast
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Adriana Blakaj
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Maryam Shahi
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alessandro Santin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Molly Klein
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Michelle Dolan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - J Stuart Ferriss
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mahmoud Khalifa
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pothuri B, Alvarez Secord A, Armstrong DK, Chan J, Fader AN, Huh W, Kesterson J, Liu JF, Moore K, Westin SN, Naumann RW. Anti-cancer therapy and clinical trial considerations for gynecologic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:16-24. [PMID: 32386911 PMCID: PMC7177100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic has consumed considerable resources and has impacted the delivery of cancer care. Patients with cancer may have factors which place them at high risk for COVID 19 morbidity or mortality. Highly immunosuppressive chemotherapy regimens and possible exposure to COVID-19 during treatment may put patients at additional risk. The Society of Gynecologic Oncology convened an expert panel to address recommendations for best practices during this crisis to minimize risk to patients from deviations in cancer care and from COVID-19 morbidity. METHODS An expert panel convened to develop initial consensus guidelines regarding anti-neoplastic therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to gynecologic cancer care and clinical trials. RESULTS COVID-19 poses special risks to patients who are older, have medical co-morbidities, and cancer. In addition, this pandemic will likely strain resources, making delivery of cancer care or conduct of clinical trials unpredictable. Recommendations are to limit visits and contact with health care facilities by using telemedicine when appropriate, and choosing regimens which require less frequent visits and which are less immunosuppressive. Deviations will occur in clinical trials as a result of limited resources, and it is important to understand regulatory obligations to trial sponsors as well as to the IRB to ensure that clinical trial and patient safety oversight are maintained. CONCLUSIONS The ongoing crisis will strain resources needed to deliver cancer care. When alterations to the delivery of care are mandated, efforts should be taken to minimize risks and maximize safety while approximating standard practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavana Pothuri
- NYU Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| | | | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John Chan
- California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Warner Huh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | - Joyce F Liu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen Moore
- University of Oklahoma, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | - Shannon N Westin
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - R Wendel Naumann
- Levine Cancer Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sisodia RC, Dewdney SB, Fader AN, Wethington SL, Melamed A, Von Gruenigen VE, Zivanovic O, Carter J, Cohn DE, Huh W, Wenzel L, Doll K, Cella D, Dowdy SC. Patient reported outcomes measures in gynecologic oncology: A primer for clinical use, Part II. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:201-207. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
36
|
Borahay MA, Wethington SL, Wang KC, Christianson MS, Martin S, Lawson SM, Esguerra C, Lippitt MH, Wu H, Handa VL, Satin AJ, Fader AN. Patient-Centered, Gynecology-Specific Prioritization of Nonurgent Surgeries during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Proposal of a Novel Scoring System. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27:1429-1433. [PMID: 32504823 PMCID: PMC7837225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
37
|
Najjar O, Varghese A, Shahi M, Vang R, Gaillard S, Smith T, Fader AN. Aromatase inhibitor therapy in recurrent, estrogen-receptor positive uterine serous carcinoma: A case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2020; 32:100555. [PMID: 32215315 PMCID: PMC7091228 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a critical need for therapeutic options in uterine serous carcinoma (USC). A substantial proportion of USC cases express estrogen receptors (ER). This report describes use of letrozole therapy in recurrent, ER-positive USC. Zoledronic acid may enhance letrozole efficacy against hormone-sensitive tumors. Aromatase inhibitors could be a potential treatment option in ER-positive USC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Najjar
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Aaron Varghese
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Maryam Shahi
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Russell Vang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Stephanie Gaillard
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Thomas Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Acosta-Torres S, Fader AN. Laparoscopic splenectomy for secondary cytoreduction of ovarian cancer in a woman with localized splenic recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:744-745. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
39
|
Acosta-Torres S, Murdock T, Matsuno R, Beavis AL, Stone RL, Wethington SL, Levinson K, Grumbine F, Ferriss JS, Tanner EJ, Fader AN. The addition of metformin to progestin therapy in the fertility-sparing treatment of women with atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or endometrial cancer: Little impact on response and low live-birth rates. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:348-356. [PMID: 32085863 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objectives were 1) to compare the efficacy of progestin therapy combined with metformin (Prog-Met) to Prog alone as primary fertility sparing treatment in women with atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) or early-stage endometrioid carcinoma (EC), and 2) to analyze the proportion of women achieving live birth following treatment. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of all reproductive-aged women with AH/IN or EC treated with Prog ± Met from 1999-2018 was conducted. Complete response (CR) was assessed and Kaplan-Meier analysis used to calculate time to CR. Comparison of potential response predictors was performed with multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS Ninety-two women met criteria; 59% (n = 54) were treated for AH/EIN and 41% (n = 38) for EC. Their median age, body mass index, and follow up time was 35 years, 37.7 kg/m2, and 28.4 months, respectively. Fifty-eight women (63%) received Prog and 34 (37%) received Prog-Met. Overall, 79% (n = 73) of subjects responded to treatment with a CR of 69% (n = 63). There was no difference in CR (p = 0.90) or time to CR (p = 0.31) between the treatment cohorts. Overall, 22% experienced a disease recurrence. On multivariable analysis, EC histology was the only covariate associated with a decreased Prog response (HR 0.48; p = 0.007). Only 17% of the cohort achieved a live-birth pregnancy, the majority of which required assisted reproductive technologies (81%) and occurred in the Prog treatment group. CONCLUSIONS Our study does not support the use of Prog-Met therapy for treatment of AH/EIN or EC. Additionally, fewer than 20% of women achieved a live-birth pregnancy during the study period, with most requiring ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefany Acosta-Torres
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tricia Murdock
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rayna Matsuno
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anna L Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie L Wethington
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kimberly Levinson
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Francis Grumbine
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - J Stuart Ferriss
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Edward J Tanner
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Slomovitz B, Gourley C, Carey MS, Malpica A, Shih IM, Huntsman D, Fader AN, Grisham RN, Schlumbrecht M, Sun CC, Ludemann J, Cooney GA, Coleman R, Sood AK, Mahdi H, Wong KK, Covens A, O'Malley DM, Lecuru F, Cobb LP, Caputo TA, May T, Huang M, Siemon J, Fernández ML, Ray-Coquard I, Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: State of the science. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:715-725. [PMID: 31969252 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Slomovitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark S Carey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - David Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Schlumbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Charlotte C Sun
- Division of Surgery, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jane Ludemann
- Cure Our Ovarian Cancer, cureourovariancancer.org, New Zealand
| | - Gail Austin Cooney
- University of Miami/JFK Medical Center Palm Beach Regional Graduate Medical Education Consortium, Hospice and Palliative Medicine Program, West Palm Beach, FL, United States
| | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Haider Mahdi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Kwong K Wong
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Allan Covens
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The James CCC at the Wexner Medical Center-The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Service de Chirurgie Cancérologique Gynécologique et du Sein, Hôpital Européen George Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Lauren P Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Thomas A Caputo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marilyn Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - John Siemon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Leon Bèrard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO), Lyon, France
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beavis AL, Yen TT, Stone RL, Wethington SL, Carr C, Son J, Chambers L, Michener CM, Ricci S, Burkett WC, Richardson DL, Staley AS, Ahn S, Gehrig PA, Torres D, Dowdy SC, Sullivan MW, Modesitt SC, Watson C, Veade A, Ehrisman J, Havrilesky L, Secord AA, Loreen A, Griffin K, Jackson A, Viswanathan AN, Jager LR, Fader AN. Adjuvant therapy for early stage, endometrial cancer with lymphovascular space invasion: Is there a role for chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:568-574. [PMID: 31948730 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an independent risk factor for recurrence and poor survival in early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC), but optimal adjuvant treatment is unknown. We aimed to compare the survival of women with early-stage EEC with LVSI treated postoperatively with observation (OBS), radiation (RAD, external beam and/or vaginal brachytherapy), or chemotherapy (CHEMO)+/-RAD. METHODS This was a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of women with stage I or II EEC with LVSI who underwent hysterectomy+/-lymphadenectomy from 2005 to 2015 and received OBS, RAD, or CHEMO+/-RAD postoperatively. Progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS In total, 478 women were included; median age was 64 years, median follow-up was 50.3 months. After surgery, 143 (30%) underwent OBS, 232 (48.5%) received RAD, and 103(21.5%) received CHEMO+/-RAD (95% of whom received RAD). Demographics were similar among groups, but those undergoing OBS had lower stage and grade. A total of 101 (21%) women recurred. Progression-free survival (PFS) was improved in both CHEMO+/-RAD (HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09-0.39) and RAD (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.54) groups compared to OBS, though neither adjuvant therapy was superior to the other. However, in grade 3 tumors, the CHEMO+/-RAD group had superior PFS compared to both RAD (HR 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12-0.52) and OBS cohorts (HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.03-0.32). Overall survival did not differ by treatment. CONCLUSIONS In early-stage EEC with LVSI, adjuvant therapy improved PFS compared to observation alone. In those with grade 3 EEC, adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation improved PFS compared to observation or radiation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Ting-Tai Yen
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie L Wethington
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Caitlin Carr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ji Son
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Laura Chambers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chad M Michener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephanie Ricci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Wesley C Burkett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Debra L Richardson
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Allison-Stuart Staley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Susie Ahn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paola A Gehrig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Diogo Torres
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mackenzie W Sullivan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Susan C Modesitt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Catherine Watson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashely Veade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jessie Ehrisman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura Havrilesky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amy Loreen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Griffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Amanda Jackson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Leah R Jager
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liu C, Dillon J, Beavis AL, Liu Y, Lombardo K, Fader AN, Hung CF, Wu TC, Vang R, Garcia JE, Xing D. Prevalence of somatic and germline mutations of Fumarate hydratase in uterine leiomyomas from young patients. Histopathology 2020; 76:354-365. [PMID: 31564060 DOI: 10.1111/his.14007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) syndrome is caused by germline mutations in the Fumarate hydratase (FH) gene. In young women, the syndrome often presents with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas, leading to myomectomy or hysterectomy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence and mutational profiles of FH-negative leiomyomas from young patients, thus allowing for early identification and triage of syndromic patients for surveillance. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated 153 cases of uterine leiomyomas from women aged up to 30 years for loss of FH expression by tissue microarray (TMA)-based immunohistochemical staining. Mutational analysis of tumours with loss of FH was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 10 exons within the FH gene and subsequent Sanger sequencing. The status of promoter methylation was assessed by bisulphite sequencing. Loss of FH protein expression was detected in seven (4.6%) of 153 tested uterine leiomyomas from young patients. All FH-negative leiomyomas displayed staghorn vasculature and fibrillary/neurophil-like cytoplasm. We found that six (86%) of seven FH-negative tumours detected by immunohistochemistry harboured FH mutations, 50% of which contained germline mutations. In particular, the germline mutational rate in FH gene was 2.0% (three of 153 cases). Bisulphite sequencing analysis failed to detect promoter methylation in any of the seven tumours. CONCLUSION Our study showed a relatively high rate of FH germline mutation in FH-negative uterine leiomyomas from patients aged up to 30 years. While genetic mutations confer protein expression loss, epigenetic regulation of the FH gene appears to be unrelated to this phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengbao Liu
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jessica Dillon
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anna L Beavis
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yuehua Liu
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kara Lombardo
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Hung
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tzyy-Choou Wu
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Russell Vang
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jairo E Garcia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Deyin Xing
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kurnit KC, Sinno AK, Fellman BM, Varghese A, Stone R, Sood AK, Gershenson DM, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, Fader AN, Frumovitz M. Effects of Gastrointestinal-Type Chemotherapy in Women With Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134:1253-1259. [PMID: 31764736 PMCID: PMC7100606 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with standard gynecologic regimens for women with ovarian mucinous carcinoma. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic centers. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy contained 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin. Gynecologic regimens included standard carboplatin or cisplatin. Bevacizumab treatment was allowed in both groups. Summary statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics; Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-two patients received either gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy (n=26; 50%) or a standard gynecologic regimen (n=26; 50%). Three-quarters of tumors were early-stage (I or II), 68% grade 1 or 2 and 88% of patients had no gross residual disease after surgery. Patients receiving gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy were more likely to receive bevacizumab (50% vs 4%; P<.001), but there were no other differences in clinical or demographic characteristics. Unadjusted overall survival analyses showed that gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), as were early stage tumors and having no gross residual disease. CONCLUSION Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab was associated with improved survival and should be considered in patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma requiring adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C. Kurnit
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdulrahman K. Sinno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View/UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aaron Varghese
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anil K. Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David M. Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ferriss JS, Fader AN. Enough already: Is this the end of comprehensive lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer or are further trials needed? Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:175-176. [PMID: 31677650 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James Stuart Ferriss
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang Y, Li L, Douville C, Cohen JD, Yen TT, Kinde I, Sundfelt K, Kjær SK, Hruban RH, Shih IM, Wang TL, Kurman RJ, Springer S, Ptak J, Popoli M, Schaefer J, Silliman N, Dobbyn L, Tanner EJ, Angarita A, Lycke M, Jochumsen K, Afsari B, Danilova L, Levine DA, Jardon K, Zeng X, Arseneau J, Fu L, Diaz LA, Karchin R, Tomasetti C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Fader AN, Gilbert L, Papadopoulos N. Evaluation of liquid from the Papanicolaou test and other liquid biopsies for the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers. Sci Transl Med 2019; 10:10/433/eaap8793. [PMID: 29563323 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aap8793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We report the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers based on genetic analyses of DNA recovered from the fluids obtained during a routine Papanicolaou (Pap) test. The new test, called PapSEEK, incorporates assays for mutations in 18 genes as well as an assay for aneuploidy. In Pap brush samples from 382 endometrial cancer patients, 81% [95% confidence interval (CI), 77 to 85%] were positive, including 78% of patients with early-stage disease. The sensitivity in 245 ovarian cancer patients was 33% (95% CI, 27 to 39%), including 34% of patients with early-stage disease. In contrast, only 1.4% of 714 women without cancer had positive Pap brush samples (specificity, ~99%). Next, we showed that intrauterine sampling with a Tao brush increased the detection of malignancy over endocervical sampling with a Pap brush: 93% of 123 (95% CI, 87 to 97%) patients with endometrial cancer and 45% of 51 (95% CI, 31 to 60%) patients with ovarian cancer were positive, whereas none of the samples from 125 women without cancer were positive (specificity, 100%). Finally, in 83 ovarian cancer patients in whom plasma was available, circulating tumor DNA was found in 43% of patients (95% CI, 33 to 55%). When plasma and Pap brush samples were both tested, the sensitivity for ovarian cancer increased to 63% (95% CI, 51 to 73%). These results demonstrate the potential of mutation-based diagnostics to detect gynecologic cancers at a stage when they are more likely to be curable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxuan Wang
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lu Li
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Christopher Douville
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joshua D Cohen
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Ting-Tai Yen
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | | | - Karin Sundfelt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 405 30, Sweden
| | - Susanne K Kjær
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.,Unit of Virus, Lifestyle, and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Robert J Kurman
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Simeon Springer
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Janine Ptak
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Maria Popoli
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joy Schaefer
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Natalie Silliman
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lisa Dobbyn
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Edward J Tanner
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ana Angarita
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 405 30, Sweden
| | - Kirsten Jochumsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark
| | - Bahman Afsari
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Ludmila Danilova
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Centre, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kris Jardon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, and Pathology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Xing Zeng
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, and Pathology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jocelyne Arseneau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, and Pathology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Lili Fu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, and Pathology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Rachel Karchin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Cristian Tomasetti
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. .,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Lucy Gilbert
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, and Pathology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dumas K, Wilbur M, Dillon J, Cliby W, Langstraat C, Fader AN, Xing D, Stone RL. Paraneoplastic nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver associated with placental site trophoblastic tumor. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2019; 29:16-19. [PMID: 31193692 PMCID: PMC6541757 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
•NRH-L is a rare disease that may lead to non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.•NRH-L may present as a paraneoplastic disorder, complicating oncologic treatment.•This is the first case of NRH-L as a potential paraneoplastic disorder due to PSTT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Dumas
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - MaryAnn Wilbur
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Jessica Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - William Cliby
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Carrie Langstraat
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Deyin Xing
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Rebecca L. Stone
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
- Corresponding author at: Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda N Fader
- From the Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pisanic TR, Cope LM, Lin SF, Yen TT, Athamanolap P, Asaka R, Nakayama K, Fader AN, Wang TH, Shih IM, Wang TL. Methylomic Analysis of Ovarian Cancers Identifies Tumor-Specific Alterations Readily Detectable in Early Precursor Lesions. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:6536-6547. [PMID: 30108103 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) typically remains undiagnosed until advanced stages when peritoneal dissemination has already occurred. Here, we sought to identify HGSOC-specific alterations in DNA methylation and assess their potential to provide sensitive and specific detection of HGSOC at its earliest stages. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MethylationEPIC genome-wide methylation analysis was performed on a discovery cohort comprising 23 HGSOC, 37 non-HGSOC malignant, and 36 histologically unremarkable gynecologic tissue samples. The resulting data were processed using selective bioinformatic criteria to identify regions of high-confidence HGSOC-specific differential methylation. Quantitative methylation-specific real-time PCR (qMSP) assays were then developed for 8 of the top-performing regions and analytically validated in a cohort of 90 tissue samples. Lastly, qMSP assays were used to assess and compare methylation in 30 laser-capture microdissected (LCM) fallopian tube epithelia samples obtained from cancer-free and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) positive women. RESULTS Bioinformatic selection identified 91 regions of robust, HGSOC-specific hypermethylation, 23 of which exhibited an area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) value ≥ 0.9 in the discovery cohort. Seven of 8 top-performing regions demonstrated AUC values between 0.838 and 0.968 when analytically validated by qMSP in a 90-patient cohort. A panel of the 3 top-performing genes (c17orf64, IRX2, and TUBB6) was able to perfectly discriminate HGSOC (AUC 1.0). Hypermethylation within these loci was found exclusively in LCM fallopian tube epithelia from women with STIC lesions, but not in cancer-free fallopian tubes. CONCLUSIONS A panel of methylation biomarkers can be used to accurately identify HGSOC, even at precursor stages of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Pisanic
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Leslie M Cope
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Departments of Oncology and Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shiou-Fu Lin
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ting-Tai Yen
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Pornpat Athamanolap
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ryoichi Asaka
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kentaro Nakayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tza-Huei Wang
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. .,Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Varma S, Mehta A, Hutfless S, Stone RL, Wethington SL, Fader AN. Is there evidence of a July effect among patients undergoing hysterectomy surgery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:176.e1-176.e9. [PMID: 29870735 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is hypothesized that the quality of health care decreases during trainee turnovers at the beginning of the academic year. The influx of new gynecology and surgery residents into hospitals in this setting may be associated with poorer surgical outcomes, known as the July effect. OBJECTIVE We sought to systematically study hysterectomy outcomes in the state of Maryland during the 3-month period July through September as compared to all other months of the academic year, in order to assess for the presence of a July effect in hysterectomy surgery. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective study of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission Database from July 2012 through September 2015 focused on women undergoing hysterectomies for benign or malignant disease, either by obstetricians and gynecologists or gynecologic oncologists, during July through September vs October through June. Multivariable logistic regressions accounted for clustering by hospitals and adjusted for several cofactors. The primary outcome includes at least 1 of 11 major perioperative in-hospital complications; the secondary outcomes were extended postoperative length of stay (defined as >2 days) and 30-day inpatient readmission rates. RESULTS We identified 6311 hysterectomies (78.2% benign) performed by 424 surgeons at 20 academic hospitals. Patients were primarily white (42.8%), 45-64 years old (54.4%), and had private insurance (66.3%). The unadjusted rate of in-hospital complications was 16.8%, extended length of stay was 30.3%, and 30-day readmissions was 6.6%. After adjustment, patients undergoing hysterectomies during July through September did not have more adverse outcomes relative to those undergoing surgery at other times of the year: complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.01), length of stay >2 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.19), and 30-day readmissions (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.23). Sensitivity analyses assessing individual complications, hysterectomy outcomes at nonacademic hospitals, and benign vs malignant indications for hysterectomies yielded similar findings. CONCLUSION Women in Maryland undergoing hysterectomy surgery at academic hospitals during July through September of the academic year did not experience worse outcomes relative to women having surgery in other months. Additional studies are necessary to further assess the possibility of a July effect in hysterectomy on a national basis. Institutions should continue to provide effective surgical training environments for new interns and residents transitioning to more senior roles, while maintaining optimal patient safety.
Collapse
|
50
|
Anderson R, Armour E, Beeckler C, Briner V, Choflet A, Cox A, Fader AN, Hannah MN, Hobbs R, Huang E, Kiely M, Lee J, Morcos M, McMillan PE, Miller D, Ng SK, Prasad R, Souranis A, Thomsen R, DeWeese TL, Viswanathan AN. Interventional Radiation Oncology (IRO): Transition of a magnetic resonance simulator to a brachytherapy suite. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:587-596. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 12/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|