1
|
Stockbauer A, Beyer L, Huber M, Kreuzer A, Palleis C, Katzdobler S, Rauchmann BS, Morbelli S, Chincarini A, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Kramberger MG, Trost M, Garibotto V, Nicastro N, Lathuilière A, Lemstra AW, van Berckel BNM, Pilotto A, Padovani A, Ochoa-Figueroa MA, Davidsson A, Camacho V, Peira E, Bauckneht M, Pardini M, Sambuceti G, Aarsland D, Nobili F, Gross M, Vöglein J, Perneczky R, Pogarell O, Buerger K, Franzmeier N, Danek A, Levin J, Höglinger GU, Bartenstein P, Cumming P, Rominger A, Brendel M. Metabolic network alterations as a supportive biomarker in dementia with Lewy bodies with preserved dopamine transmission. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1023-1034. [PMID: 37971501 PMCID: PMC10881642 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06493-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metabolic network analysis of FDG-PET utilizes an index of inter-regional correlation of resting state glucose metabolism and has been proven to provide complementary information regarding the disease process in parkinsonian syndromes. The goals of this study were (i) to evaluate pattern similarities of glucose metabolism and network connectivity in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) subjects with subthreshold dopaminergic loss compared to advanced disease stages and to (ii) investigate metabolic network alterations of FDG-PET for discrimination of patients with early DLB from other neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy) at individual patient level via principal component analysis (PCA). METHODS FDG-PETs of subjects with probable or possible DLB (n = 22) without significant dopamine deficiency (z-score < 2 in putamen binding loss on DaT-SPECT compared to healthy controls (HC)) were scaled by global-mean, prior to volume-of-interest-based analyses of relative glucose metabolism. Single region metabolic changes and network connectivity changes were compared against HC (n = 23) and against DLB subjects with significant dopamine deficiency (n = 86). PCA was applied to test discrimination of patients with DLB from disease controls (n = 101) at individual patient level. RESULTS Similar patterns of hypo- (parietal- and occipital cortex) and hypermetabolism (basal ganglia, limbic system, motor cortices) were observed in DLB patients with and without significant dopamine deficiency when compared to HC. Metabolic connectivity alterations correlated between DLB patients with and without significant dopamine deficiency (R2 = 0.597, p < 0.01). A PCA trained by DLB patients with dopamine deficiency and HC discriminated DLB patients without significant dopaminergic loss from other neurodegenerative parkinsonian disorders at individual patient level (area-under-the-curve (AUC): 0.912). CONCLUSION Disease-specific patterns of altered glucose metabolism and altered metabolic networks are present in DLB subjects without significant dopaminergic loss. Metabolic network alterations in FDG-PET can act as a supporting biomarker in the subgroup of DLB patients without significant dopaminergic loss at symptoms onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Stockbauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Huber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Kreuzer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Katzdobler
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- Nuclear Medicine Uni, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Chincarini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Genoa Section, Genoa, Italy
| | - Rose Bruffaerts
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
- Experimental Neurobiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Department of Neurology and Department for Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Trost
- Department of Neurology and Department for Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and NIMTLab, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Nicastro
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurélien Lathuilière
- LANVIE (Laboratoire de Neuroimagerie du Vieillissement), Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Pilotto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation Centre, FERB ONLUS - S. Isidoro Hospital, Trescore Balneario, BG, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Miguel A Ochoa-Figueroa
- Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anette Davidsson
- Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Valle Camacho
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrico Peira
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Genoa Section, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine Uni, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Pardini
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Clinical Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianmario Sambuceti
- Nuclear Medicine Uni, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Centre of Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Clinical Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mattes Gross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Vöglein
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Perneczky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2HQ, UK
- Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Oliver Pogarell
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Buerger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Institut for Stroke and Dementia Research, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Adrian Danek
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Günter U Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Cumming
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- School of Psychology and Counselling and IHBI, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coomans EM, de Koning LA, Rikken RM, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, den Braber A, Tomassen J, van de Beek M, Collij LE, Lemstra AW, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Golla SSV, Visser PJ, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, van Berckel BNM, van de Giessen E. Performance of a [ 18F]Flortaucipir PET Visual Read Method Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum and in Dementia With Lewy Bodies. Neurology 2023; 101:e1850-e1862. [PMID: 37748892 PMCID: PMC10663007 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the tau-binding radiotracer [18F]flortaucipir and an accompanying visual read method to support the diagnostic process in cognitively impaired patients assessed for Alzheimer disease (AD). Studies evaluating this visual read method are limited. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the visual read method in participants along the AD continuum and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) by determining its reliability, accordance with semiquantitative analyses, and associations with clinically relevant variables. METHODS We included participants who underwent tau-PET at Amsterdam University Medical Center. A subset underwent follow-up tau-PET. Two trained nuclear medicine physicians visually assessed all scans. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen κ. To examine the concordance of visual read tau positivity with semiquantification, we defined standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) positivity using different threshold approaches. To evaluate the prognostic value of tau-PET visual read, we performed linear mixed models with longitudinal Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS We included 263 participants (mean age 68.5 years, 45.6% female), including 147 cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants, 97 amyloid-positive participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia (AD), and 19 participants with DLB. The visual read inter-reader agreement was excellent (κ = 0.95, CI 0.91-0.99). None of the amyloid-negative CU participants (0/92 [0%]) and 1 amyloid-negative participant with DLB (1/12 [8.3%]) were tau-positive. Among amyloid-positive participants, 13 CU participants (13/52 [25.0%]), 85 with AD (85/97 [87.6%]), and 3 with DLB (3/7 [42.9%]) were tau-positive. Two-year follow-up visual read status was identical to baseline. Tau-PET visual read corresponded strongly to SUVr status, with up to 90.4% concordance. Visual read tau positivity was associated with a decline on the MMSE in CU participants (β = -0.52, CI -0.74 to -0.30, p < 0.001) and participants with AD (β = -0.30, CI -0.58 to -0.02, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION The excellent inter-reader agreement, strong correspondence with SUVr, and longitudinal stability indicate that the visual read method is reliable and robust, supporting clinical application. Furthermore, visual read tau positivity was associated with prospective cognitive decline, highlighting its additional prognostic potential. Future studies in unselected cohorts are needed for a better generalizability to the clinical population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that [18F]flortaucipir visual read accurately distinguishes patients with low tau-tracer binding from those with high tau-tracer binding and is associated with amyloid positivity and cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden.
| | - Lotte A de Koning
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Roos M Rikken
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Denise Visser
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Anouk den Braber
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Jori Tomassen
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Marleen van de Beek
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Elsmarieke van de Giessen
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tuncel H, Visser D, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Head-to-head comparison of relative cerebral blood flow derived from dynamic [ 18F]florbetapir and [ 18F]flortaucipir PET in subjects with subjective cognitive decline. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:93. [PMID: 37889456 PMCID: PMC10611685 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01041-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dynamic PET imaging studies provide accurate estimates of specific binding, but also measure the relative tracer delivery (R1), which is a proxy for relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Recently, studies suggested that R1 obtained from different tracers could be used interchangeably and is irrespective of target tissue. However, the similarities or differences of R1 obtained from different PET tracers still require validation. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to compare R1 estimates, derived from dynamic [18F]florbetapir (amyloid) and [18F]flortaucipir (tau) PET, in the same subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). RESULTS Voxel-wise analysis presented a small cluster (1.6% of the whole brain) with higher R1 values for [18F]flortaucipir compared to [18F]florbetapir in the Aβ-negative group. These voxels were part of the hippocampus and the left middle occipital gyrus. In part of the thalamus, midbrain and cerebellum, voxels (2.5% of the whole brain) with higher R1 values for [18F]florbetapir were observed. In the Aβ-positive group, a cluster (0.2% of the whole brain) of higher R1 values was observed in part of the hippocampus, right parahippocampal gyrus and in the left sagittal stratum for [18F]flortaucipir compared to [18F]florbetapir. Furthermore, in part of the thalamus, left amygdala, midbrain and right parahippocampal gyrus voxels (0.4% of the whole brain) with higher R1 values for [18F]florbetapir were observed. Despite these differences, [18F]florbetapir R1 had high correspondence with [18F]flortaucipir R1 across all regions of interest (ROIs) and subjects (Aβ-:r2 = 0.79, slope = 0.85, ICC = 0.76; Aβ+: r2 = 0.87, slope = 0.93, ICC = 0.77). CONCLUSION [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir showed similar R1 estimates in cortical regions. This finding, put together with previous studies, indicates that R1 could be considered a surrogate for relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the cortex and may be used interchangeably, but with caution, regardless of the choice of these two tracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schoonhoven DN, Coomans EM, Millán AP, van Nifterick AM, Visser D, Ossenkoppele R, Tuncel H, van der Flier WM, Golla SSV, Scheltens P, Hillebrand A, van Berckel BNM, Stam CJ, Gouw AA. Tau protein spreads through functionally connected neurons in Alzheimer's disease: a combined MEG/PET study. Brain 2023; 146:4040-4054. [PMID: 37279597 PMCID: PMC10545627 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggest that tau proteins spread through the brain following neuronal connections. Several mechanisms could be involved in this process: spreading between brain regions that interact strongly (functional connectivity); through the pattern of anatomical connections (structural connectivity); or simple diffusion. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated which spreading pathways influence tau protein spreading by modelling the tau propagation process using an epidemic spreading model. We compared the modelled tau depositions with 18F-flortaucipir PET binding potentials at several stages of the AD continuum. In this cross-sectional study, we analysed source-reconstructed MEG data and dynamic 100-min 18F-flortaucipir PET from 57 subjects positive for amyloid-β pathology [preclinical AD (n = 16), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (n = 16) and AD dementia (n = 25)]. Cognitively healthy subjects without amyloid-β pathology were included as controls (n = 25). Tau propagation was modelled as an epidemic process (susceptible-infected model) on MEG-based functional networks [in alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands], a structural or diffusion network, starting from the middle and inferior temporal lobe. The group-level network of the control group was used as input for the model to predict tau deposition in three stages of the AD continuum. To assess performance, model output was compared to the group-specific tau deposition patterns as measured with 18F-flortaucipir PET. We repeated the analysis by using networks of the preceding disease stage and/or using regions with most observed tau deposition during the preceding stage as seeds. In the preclinical AD stage, the functional networks predicted most of the modelled tau-PET binding potential, with best correlations between model and tau-PET [corrected amplitude envelope correlation (AEC-c) alpha C = 0.584; AEC-c beta C = 0.569], followed by the structural network (C = 0.451) and simple diffusion (C = 0.451). Prediction accuracy declined for the MCI and AD dementia stages, although the correlation between modelled tau and tau-PET binding remained highest for the functional networks (C = 0.384; C = 0.376). Replacing the control-network with the network from the preceding disease stage and/or alternative seeds improved prediction accuracy in MCI but not in the dementia stage. These results suggest that in addition to structural connections, functional connections play an important role in tau spread, and highlight that neuronal dynamics play a key role in promoting this pathological process. Aberrant neuronal communication patterns should be taken into account when identifying targets for future therapy. Our results also suggest that this process is more important in earlier disease stages (preclinical AD/MCI); possibly, in later stages, other processes may be influential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah N Schoonhoven
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ana P Millán
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M van Nifterick
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Hillebrand
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Systems and Network Neuroscience, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Stam
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alida A Gouw
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coomans EM, Tomassen J, Ossenkoppele R, Tijms BM, Lorenzini L, ten Kate M, Collij LE, Heeman F, Rikken RM, van der Landen SM, den Hollander ME, Golla SSV, Yaqub M, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, de Geus EJC, Visser PJ, van Berckel BNM, den Braber A. Genetically identical twin-pair difference models support the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Brain 2023; 146:3735-3746. [PMID: 36892415 PMCID: PMC10473566 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The amyloid cascade hypothesis has strongly impacted the Alzheimer's disease research agenda and clinical trial designs over the past decades, but precisely how amyloid-β pathology initiates the aggregation of neocortical tau remains unclear. We cannot exclude the possibility of a shared upstream process driving both amyloid-β and tau in an independent manner instead of there being a causal relationship between amyloid-β and tau. Here, we tested the premise that if a causal relationship exists, then exposure should be associated with outcome both at the individual level as well as within identical twin-pairs, who are strongly matched on genetic, demographic and shared environmental background. Specifically, we tested associations between longitudinal amyloid-β PET and cross-sectional tau PET, neurodegeneration and cognitive decline using genetically identical twin-pair difference models, which provide the unique opportunity of ruling out genetic and shared environmental effects as potential confounders in an association. We included 78 cognitively unimpaired identical twins with [18F]flutemetamol (amyloid-β)-PET, [18F]flortaucipir (tau)-PET, MRI (hippocampal volume) and cognitive data (composite memory). Associations between each modality were tested at the individual level using generalized estimating equation models, and within identical twin-pairs using within-pair difference models. Mediation analyses were performed to test for directionality in the associations as suggested by the amyloid cascade hypothesis. At the individual level, we observed moderate-to-strong associations between amyloid-β, tau, neurodegeneration and cognition. The within-pair difference models replicated results observed at the individual level with comparably strong effect sizes. Within-pair differences in amyloid-β were strongly associated with within-pair differences in tau (β = 0.68, P < 0.001), and moderately associated with within-pair differences in hippocampal volume (β = -0.37, P = 0.03) and memory functioning (β = -0.57, P < 0.001). Within-pair differences in tau were moderately associated with within-pair differences in hippocampal volume (β = -0.53, P < 0.001) and strongly associated with within-pair differences in memory functioning (β = -0.68, P < 0.001). Mediation analyses showed that of the total twin-difference effect of amyloid-β on memory functioning, the proportion mediated through pathways including tau and hippocampal volume was 69.9%, which was largely attributable to the pathway leading from amyloid-β to tau to memory functioning (proportion mediated, 51.6%). Our results indicate that associations between amyloid-β, tau, neurodegeneration and cognition are unbiased by (genetic) confounding. Furthermore, effects of amyloid-β on neurodegeneration and cognitive decline were fully mediated by tau. These novel findings in this unique sample of identical twins are compatible with the amyloid cascade hypothesis and thereby provide important new knowledge for clinical trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, 205 02 Lund, Sweden
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Lorenzini
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara ten Kate
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roos M Rikken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie M van der Landen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke E den Hollander
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eco J C de Geus
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Engelen MPE, Verfaillie SCJ, Dols A, Oudega ML, Boellaard R, Golla SSV, den Hollander M, Ossenkoppele R, Scheltens P, van Berckel BNM, Pijnenburg YAL, Vijverberg EGB. Altered brain metabolism in frontotemporal dementia and psychiatric disorders: involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:71. [PMID: 37493827 PMCID: PMC10371967 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01020-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural symptoms and frontotemporal hypometabolism overlap between behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary psychiatric disorders (PPD), hampering diagnostic distinction. Voxel-wise comparisons of brain metabolism might identify specific frontotemporal-(hypo)metabolic regions between bvFTD and PPD. We investigated brain metabolism in bvFTD and PPD and its relationship with behavioural symptoms, social cognition, severity of depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning. RESULTS Compared to controls, bvFTD showed decreased metabolism in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) (p < 0.001), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), temporal pole, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and caudate, whereas PPD showed no hypometabolism. Compared to PPD, bvFTD showed decreased metabolism in the dACC (p < 0.001, p < 0.05FWE), insula, Broca's area, caudate, thalamus, OFC and temporal cortex (p < 0.001), whereas PPD showed decreased metabolism in the motor cortex (p < 0.001). Across bvFTD and PPD, decreased metabolism in the temporal cortex (p < 0.001, p < 0.05FWE), dACC and frontal cortex was associated with worse social cognition. Decreased metabolism in the dlPFC was associated with compulsiveness (p < 0.001). Across bvFTD, PPD and controls, decreased metabolism in the PFC and motor cortex was associated with executive dysfunctioning (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate subtle but distinct metabolic patterns in bvFTD and PPD, most strongly in the dACC. The degree of frontotemporal and cingulate hypometabolism was related to impaired social cognition, compulsiveness and executive dysfunctioning. Our findings suggest that the dACC might be an important region to differentiate between bvFTD and PPD but needs further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Paule E van Engelen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Dols
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mardien L Oudega
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Sleep & Stress Program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke den Hollander
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences Partners, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Everard G B Vijverberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Visser D, Verfaillie SCJ, Bosch I, Brouwer I, Tuncel H, Coomans EM, Rikken RM, Mastenbroek SE, Golla SSV, Barkhof F, van de Giessen E, van Berckel BNM, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R. Tau pathology as determinant of changes in atrophy and cerebral blood flow: a multi-modal longitudinal imaging study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2409-2419. [PMID: 36976303 PMCID: PMC10250461 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06196-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tau pathology is associated with concurrent atrophy and decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF) in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but less is known about their temporal relationships. Our aim was therefore to investigate the association of concurrent and longitudinal tau PET with longitudinal changes in atrophy and relative CBF. METHODS We included 61 individuals from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (mean age 65.1 ± 7.5 years, 44% female, 57% amyloid-β positive [Aβ +], 26 cognitively impaired [CI]) who underwent dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET and structural MRI at baseline and 25 ± 5 months follow-up. In addition, we included 86 individuals (68 CI) who only underwent baseline dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET and MRI scans to increase power in our statistical models. We obtained [18F]flortaucipir PET binding potential (BPND) and R1 values reflecting tau load and relative CBF, respectively, and computed cortical thickness from the structural MRI scans using FreeSurfer. We assessed the regional associations between i) baseline and ii) annual change in tau PET BPND in Braak I, III/IV, and V/VI regions and cortical thickness or R1 in cortical gray matter regions (spanning the whole brain) over time using linear mixed models with random intercepts adjusted for age, sex, time between baseline and follow-up assessments, and baseline BPND in case of analyses with annual change as determinant. All analyses were performed in Aβ- cognitively normal (CN) individuals and Aβ+ (CN and CI) individuals separately. RESULTS In Aβ+ individuals, greater baseline Braak III/IV and V/VI tau PET binding was associated with faster cortical thinning in primarily frontotemporal regions. Annual changes in tau PET were not associated with cortical thinning over time in either Aβ+ or Aβ- individuals. Baseline tau PET was not associated with longitudinal changes in relative CBF, but increases in Braak III/IV tau PET over time were associated with increases in parietal relative CBF over time in Aβ + individuals. CONCLUSION We showed that higher tau load was related to accelerated cortical thinning, but not to decreases in relative CBF. Moreover, tau PET load at baseline was a stronger predictor of cortical thinning than change of tau PET signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Bosch
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Iman Brouwer
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos M Rikken
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie E Mastenbroek
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elsmarieke van de Giessen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Verveen A, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, Csorba I, Coomans EM, Koch DW, Appelman B, Barkhof F, Boellaard R, de Bree G, van de Giessen EM, Golla S, van Heugten CM, Horn J, Hulst HE, de Jong MD, Kuut TA, van der Maaden T, van Os YMG, Prins M, Slooter AJC, Visser-Meily JMA, van Vugt M, van den Wijngaard CC, Nieuwkerk PT, Knoop H, Tolboom N, van Berckel BNM. Neurobiological basis and risk factors of persistent fatigue and concentration problems after COVID-19: study protocol for a prospective case-control study (VeCosCO). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072611. [PMID: 37399444 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The risk factors for persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the underlying pathophysiology are largely unknown. Both clinical factors and cognitive-behavioural factors have been suggested to play a role in the perpetuation of complaints. A neurobiological aetiology, such as neuroinflammation, could be the underlying pathophysiological mechanism for persisting complaints.To unravel factors associated with persisting complaints, VeCosCO will compare individuals with and without persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints >3 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The study consists of two work packages. The first work package aims to (1) investigate the relation between persisting complaints and neuropsychological functioning; (2) determine risk factors and at-risk phenotypes for the development of persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints, including the presence of postexertional malaise and (3) describe consequences of persistent complaints on quality of life, healthcare consumption and physical functioning. The second work package aims to (1) determine the presence of neuroinflammation with [18F]DPA-714 whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with persisting complaints and (2) explore the relationship between (neuro)inflammation and brain structure and functioning measured with MRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective case-control study in participants with and without persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints, >3 months after laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants will be mainly included from existing COVID-19 cohorts in the Netherlands covering the full spectrum of COVID-19 acute disease severity. Primary outcomes are neuropsychological functioning, postexertional malaise, neuroinflammation measured using [18F]DPA-714 PET, and brain functioning and structure using (f)MRI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Work package 1 (NL79575.018.21) and 2 (NL77033.029.21) were approved by the medical ethical review board of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (The Netherlands). Informed consent is required prior to participation in the study. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and shared with the key population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Verveen
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Csorba
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dook W Koch
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brent Appelman
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Godelieve de Bree
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsmarieke M van de Giessen
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep Golla
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Horn
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke E Hulst
- Anatomy & Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical, Health and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Menno D de Jong
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Microbiology & Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja A Kuut
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa van der Maaden
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne M G van Os
- Human Resources, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Prins
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J C Slooter
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Center, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Neurology, UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michele van Vugt
- Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cees C van den Wijngaard
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - P T Nieuwkerk
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Coomans EM, Verberk IMW, Ossenkoppele R, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, Gouda M, Tuncel H, Wolters EE, Timmers T, Windhorst AD, Golla SSV, Scheltens P, van WM, Flier D, van Berckel BNM, Teunissen CE. A Head-to-Head Comparison Between Plasma pTau181 and Tau PET Along the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:437-443. [PMID: 36229187 PMCID: PMC10071811 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Both plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (pTau181) and tau PET show potential for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and predicting clinical progression. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison between plasma pTau181 and tau PET along the AD continuum. Methods: We included participants from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort who underwent 18F-flortaucipir (tau) PET and had a plasma sample biobanked within 12 mo from tau PET. Fifty subjective cognitive decline (SCD) participants (31 Aβ-negative and 19 Aβ-positive) and 60 Aβ-positive participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to AD were included. A subset had 2-y longitudinal plasma pTau181 and tau PET available (n = 40). Longitudinal neuropsychological test data covering 3.2 ± 2.7 y from both before and after tau PET were available. Plasma pTau181 and tau PET were compared in their accuracies in discriminating between cognitive stage (MCI/AD vs. SCD) and preclinical Aβ status (SCD Aβ-positive vs. SCD Aβ-negative), their associations with cross-sectional and longitudinal neuropsychological test performance, and their longitudinal changes over time. Results: When discriminating between preclinical Aβ status, the area under the curve (AUC) for plasma pTau181 (0.83) and tau PET (entorhinal, 0.87; temporal, 0.85; neocortical, 0.67) were equally high (all DeLong P > 0.05), but tau PET outperformed plasma pTau181 in discriminating MCI/AD from SCD (AUC for plasma pTau181: 0.74; AUCs for tau PET: entorhinal, 0.89; temporal, 0.92; neocortical, 0.89) (all P < 0.01). Overall, tau PET showed stronger associations with cognitive decline and was associated with a wider variety of cognitive tests than plasma pTau181 (plasma pTau181, -0.02 > β < -0.12; tau PET, -0.01 > β < -0.22). Both plasma pTau181 and tau PET increased more steeply over time in MCI/AD than in SCD (P < 0.05), but only tau PET annual changes were associated with cognitive decline. Conclusion: Our results suggest that plasma pTau181 and tau PET perform equally well in identifying Aβ pathology but that tau PET better monitors disease stage and clinical progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Inge M W Verberk
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariam Gouda
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brugulat-Serrat A, Sánchez-Benavides G, Cacciaglia R, Salvadó G, Shekari M, Collij LE, Buckley C, van Berckel BNM, Perissinotti A, Niñerola-Baizán A, Milà-Alomà M, Vilor-Tejedor N, Operto G, Falcon C, Grau-Rivera O, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Minguillón C, Fauria K, Molinuevo JL, Suárez-Calvet M, Gispert JD. APOE-ε4 modulates the association between regional amyloid deposition and cognitive performance in cognitively unimpaired middle-aged individuals. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:18. [PMID: 36856866 PMCID: PMC9978048 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00967-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether the APOE-ε4 allele modulates the relationship between regional β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation and cognitive change in middle-aged cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants. METHODS The 352 CU participants (mean aged 61.1 [4.7] years) included completed two cognitive assessments (average interval 3.34 years), underwent [18F]flutemetamol Aβ positron emission tomography (PET), T1w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as APOE genotyping. Global and regional Aβ PET positivity was assessed across five regions-of-interest by visual reading (VR) and regional Centiloids. Linear regression models were developed to examine the interaction between regional and global Aβ PET positivity and APOE-ε4 status on longitudinal cognitive change assessed with the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC), episodic memory, and executive function, after controlling for age, sex, education, cognitive baseline scores, and hippocampal volume. RESULTS In total, 57 participants (16.2%) were VR+ of whom 41 (71.9%) were APOE-ε4 carriers. No significant APOE-ε4*global Aβ PET interactions were associated with cognitive change for any cognitive test. However, APOE-ε4 carriers who were VR+ in temporal areas (n = 19 [9.81%], p = 0.04) and in the striatum (n = 8 [4.14%], p = 0.01) exhibited a higher decline in the PACC. The temporal areas findings were replicated when regional PET positivity was determined with Centiloid values. Regionally, VR+ in the striatum was associated with higher memory decline. As for executive function, interactions between APOE-ε4 and regional VR+ were found in temporal and parietal regions, and in the striatum. CONCLUSION CU APOE-ε4 carriers with a positive Aβ PET VR in regions known to accumulate amyloid at later stages of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum exhibited a steeper cognitive decline. This work supports the contention that regional VR of Aβ PET might convey prognostic information about future cognitive decline in individuals at higher risk of developing AD. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT02485730. Registered 20 June 2015 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02485730 and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02685969. Registered 19 February 2016 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02685969 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Brugulat-Serrat
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain ,grid.512357.7Global Brain Health Institute, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raffaele Cacciaglia
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.5612.00000 0001 2172 2676Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lyduine E. Collij
- grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher Buckley
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Center for Medical Image Computing, and Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrés Perissinotti
- grid.410458.c0000 0000 9635 9413Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Biomedical Research Networking Center of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aida Niñerola-Baizán
- grid.410458.c0000 0000 9635 9413Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Biomedical Research Networking Center of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Milà-Alomà
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain ,grid.5612.00000 0001 2172 2676Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natàlia Vilor-Tejedor
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.5612.00000 0001 2172 2676Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.473715.30000 0004 6475 7299Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Grégory Operto
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carles Falcon
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811Neurologia Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Grau-Rivera
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811Neurologia Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eider M. Arenaza-Urquijo
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carolina Minguillón
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Karine Fauria
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.424580.f0000 0004 0476 7612H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marc Suárez-Calvet
- grid.430077.7Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain ,grid.411142.30000 0004 1767 8811Neurologia Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005, Barcelona, Spain. .,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain. .,Biomedical Research Networking Center of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
den Braber A, Verberk IMW, Tomassen J, den Dulk B, Stoops E, Dage JL, Collij LE, Barkhof F, Willemsen G, Nivard MG, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, Visser PJ, de Geus EJC, Teunissen CE. Plasma biomarkers predict amyloid pathology in cognitively normal monozygotic twins after 10 years. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad024. [PMID: 36824390 PMCID: PMC9942541 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers could prove useful to predict Alzheimer's disease core pathologies in advance of clinical symptoms. Implementation of such biomarkers requires a solid understanding of their long-term dynamics and the contribution of confounding to their association with Alzheimer's disease pathology. Here we assess the value of plasma amyloid-β1-42/1-40, phosphorylated-tau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein to detect early Alzheimer's disease pathology, accounting for confounding by genetic and early environmental factors. Participants were 200 monozygotic twins, aged ≥60 years with normal cognition from the european medical information framework for Alzheimer's disease study. All twins had amyloid-β status and plasma samples available at study enrolment. For 80 twins, additional plasma samples were available that had been collected approximately 10 years prior to amyloid-β status assessment. Single-molecule array assays were applied to measure amyloid-β1-42/1-40, phosphorylated-tau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Predictive value of and longitudinal change in these biomarkers were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and linear mixed models. Amyloid pathology could be predicted using blood-based biomarkers obtained at the time of amyloid status assessment (amyloid-β1-42/1-40: area under the curve = 0.65, P = 0.01; phosphorylated-tau181: area under the curve = 0.84, P < 0.001; glial fibrillary acidic protein: area under the curve = 0.74, P < 0.001), as well as using those obtained 10 years prior to amyloid status assessment (amyloid-β1-42/1-40: area under the curve = 0.69, P = 0.03; phosphorylated-tau181: area under the curve = 0.92, P < 0.001; glial fibrillary acidic protein: area under the curve = 0.84, P < 0.001). Longitudinally, amyloid-β1-42/1-40 levels decreased [β (SE) = -0.12 (0.01), P < 0.001] and phosphorylated-tau181 levels increased [β (SE) = 0.02 (0.01), P = 0.004]. Amyloid-β-positive individuals showed a steeper increase in phosphorylated-tau181 compared with amyloid-β-negative individuals [β (SE) = 0.06 (0.02), P = 0.004]. Also amyloid-β-positive individuals tended to show a steeper increase in glial fibrillary acidic protein [β (SE) = 0.04 (0.02), P = 0.07]. Within monozygotic twin pairs, those with higher plasma phosphorylated-tau181 and lower amyloid-β1-42/1-40 levels were more likely to be amyloid-β positive [β (SE) = 0.95 (0.26), P < 0.001; β (SE) = -0.28 (0.14), P < 0.05] indicating minimal contribution of confounding by genetic and early environmental factors. Our data support the use of amyloid-β1-42/1-40, phosphorylated-tau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein as screening tools for Alzheimer's disease pathology in the normal aging population, which is of importance for enrolment of high-risk subjects in secondary, or even primary, prevention trials. Furthermore, these markers show potential as low-invasive monitoring tool of disease progression and possibly treatment effects in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk den Braber
- Correspondence to: Anouk den Braber, PhD Alzheimer Center Amsterdam & Netherlands Twin Register Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc PK-1X, De Boelelaan 1118 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: ,
| | - Inge M W Verberk
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Neurochemistry Laboratory Department of Clinical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben den Dulk
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Neurochemistry Laboratory Department of Clinical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeffrey L Dage
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Gonneke Willemsen
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel G Nivard
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eco J C de Geus
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Neurochemistry Laboratory Department of Clinical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dubbelman MA, Sikkes SAM, Ebenau JL, van Leeuwenstijn MSSA, Kroeze LA, Trieu C, van Berckel BNM, Teunissen CE, van Harten AC, van der Flier WM. Changes in self- and study partner-perceived cognitive functioning in relation to amyloid status and future clinical progression: Findings from the SCIENCe project. Alzheimers Dement 2023. [PMID: 36642977 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated changes in self- and study partner-reported self-perceived cognitive decline in relation to amyloid pathology and clinical progression, in a sample of cognitively normal individuals. METHODS A total of 404 participants (63 ± 9 years, 44% female) and their study partners completed the Cognitive Change Index (CCI) yearly (0.7-6.8 follow-up years; n visits = 1436). Baseline and longitudinal associations between (change in) CCI scores, amyloid, and clinical progression were modeled in linear mixed models and Cox regressions. RESULTS CCI-study partner scores of amyloid-positive individuals increased over time (B = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.51, 3.06]), while CCI-self scores remained stable (B = -0.45, 95% CI = [-1.77, 0.87]). Ten-point higher baseline CCI-study partner (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.75, 95% CI = [1.30, 2.36]) and CCI-self scores (HR = 1.90, 95% CI = [1.40, 2.58]) were associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk of progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. DISCUSSION Study partner-reported but not self-perceived complaints increase over time in amyloid-positive individuals, supporting the value of longitudinal study partner report, even in initially cognitively normal individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Dubbelman
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sietske A M Sikkes
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Clinical Developmental Psychology & Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jarith L Ebenau
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mardou S S A van Leeuwenstijn
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lior A Kroeze
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Calvin Trieu
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Argonde C van Harten
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ebenau JL, Visser D, Verfaillie SCJ, Timmers T, van Leeuwenstijn MSSA, Kate MT, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Prins ND, Boellaard R, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM. Cerebral blood flow, amyloid burden, and cognition in cognitively normal individuals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:410-422. [PMID: 36071221 PMCID: PMC9816289 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05958-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease is complex and largely unknown. We investigated cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between CBF, amyloid burden, and cognition, in cognitively normal individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). METHODS We included 187 cognitively normal individuals with SCD from the SCIENCe project (65 ± 8 years, 39% F, MMSE 29 ± 1). Each underwent a dynamic (0-70 min) [18F]florbetapir PET and T1-weighted MRI scan, enabling calculation of mean binding potential (BPND; specific amyloid binding) and R1 (measure of relative (r)CBF). Eighty-three individuals underwent a second [18F]florbetapir PET (2.6 ± 0.7 years). Participants annually underwent neuropsychological assessment (follow-up time 3.8 ± 3.1 years; number of observations n = 774). RESULTS A low baseline R1 was associated with steeper decline on tests addressing memory, attention, and global cognition (range betas 0.01 to 0.27, p < 0.05). High BPND was associated with steeper decline on tests covering all domains (range betas - 0.004 to - 0.70, p < 0.05). When both predictors were simultaneously added to the model, associations remained essentially unchanged. Additionally, we found longitudinal associations between R1 and BPND. High baseline BPND predicted decline over time in R1 (all regions, range betasBP×time - 0.09 to - 0.14, p < 0.05). Vice versa, low baseline R1 predicted increase in BPND in frontal, temporal, and composite ROIs over time (range betasR1×time - 0.03 to - 0.08, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that amyloid accumulation and decrease in rCBF are two parallel disease processes without a fixed order, both providing unique predictive information for cognitive decline and each process enhancing the other longitudinally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarith L Ebenau
- Alzheimer Centre, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mardou S S A van Leeuwenstijn
- Alzheimer Centre, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara Ten Kate
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Centre, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels D Prins
- Alzheimer Centre, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Research Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Centre, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fruijtier AD, van der Schaar J, van Maurik IS, Zwan MD, Scheltens P, Bouwman F, Pijnenburg YAL, van Berckel BNM, Ebenau J, van der Flier WM, Smets EMA, Visser LNC. Identifying best practices for disclosure of amyloid imaging results: A randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:285-295. [PMID: 35366050 PMCID: PMC10084251 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Empirical studies on effective communication for amyloid disclosure in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are lacking. We aimed to study the impact of six communication strategies. METHOD We performed a randomized controlled trial with seven randomly assigned, video-vignette conditions: six emphasizing a communication strategy and one basic condition. All showed a scripted consultation of a neurologist disclosing positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan results to an MCI patient. Healthy individuals (N = 1017; mean age ± SD 64 ± 8, 808 (79%) female) were instructed to imagine themselves in the video, answered questionnaires assessing information recall, emotional state, and behavioral intentions, and evaluate the physician/information. RESULTS "Risk best practice" resulted in highest free recall compared to other strategies (P < .05), except "emotional support". Recall in "emotional support" was better compared to "basic-' and elaborate information"(P < .05). "Risk best practice" resulted in the highest uncertainty (P < .001). "Teach-back" and "emotional support" contributed to the highest evaluations (P -values < .01). CONCLUSION Risk communication best practices, attending to emotions, and teach-back techniques enhance information recall of amyloid-PET results, and could contribute to positive care evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnetha D Fruijtier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jetske van der Schaar
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S van Maurik
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa D Zwan
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jarith Ebenau
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie N C Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kronenburg A, Deckers PT, van den Berg E, van Schooneveld MM, Vonken EJ, van der Zwan A, van Berckel BNM, Yaqub M, Otte W, Klijn CJM, Braun KPJ. The profile of cognitive impairment and hemodynamic compromise in moyamoya: a single-center prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:173-184. [PMID: 35523260 DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.jns212844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with moyamoya vasculopathy often experience cognitive impairments. In this prospective single-center study, the authors investigated the profile of neurocognitive impairment and its relation with the severity of ischemic brain lesions and hemodynamic compromise. METHODS Patients treated in a Dutch tertiary referral center were prospectively included. All patients underwent standardized neuropsychological evaluation, MRI, digital subtraction angiography, and [15O]H2O-PET (to measure cerebrovascular reactivity [CVR]). The authors determined z-scores for 7 cognitive domains and the proportion of patients with cognitive impairment (z-score < -1.5 SD in at least one domain). The authors explored associations between patient characteristics, imaging and CVR findings, and cognitive scores per domain by using multivariable linear regression and Bayesian regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 40 patients (22 children; 75% females) were included. The median age for children was 9 years (range 1-16 years); for adults it was 39 years (range 19-53 years). Thirty patients (75%) had an infarction, and 31 patients (78%) had impaired CVR (steal phenomenon). Six of 7 cognitive domains scored below the population norm. Twenty-nine patients (73%) had cognitive impairment. Adults performed better than children in the cognitive domain visuospatial functioning (p = 0.033, Bayes factor = 4.0), and children performed better in processing speed (p = 0.041, Bayes factor = 3.5). The authors did not find an association between infarction, white matter disease, or CVR and cognitive domains. CONCLUSIONS In this Western cohort, cognitive functioning in patients with moyamoya vasculopathy was below the population norm, and 73% had cognitive impairment in at least one domain. The cognitive profile differed between adults and children. The authors could not find an association with imaging findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annick Kronenburg
- 1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht
| | - Pieter T Deckers
- 1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht
| | | | | | | | - Albert van der Zwan
- 1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht
| | | | - Maqsood Yaqub
- 5Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Research, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam
| | - Willem Otte
- 6Department of Pediatric Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht; and
| | - Catharina J M Klijn
- 1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht
- 7Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Center for Neuroscience, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kees P J Braun
- 1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huiskamp M, Yaqub M, van Lingen MR, Pouwels PJW, de Ruiter LRJ, Killestein J, Schwarte LA, Golla SSV, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Geurts JJG, Hulst HE. Cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis: what is the role of the gamma-aminobutyric acid system? Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad140. [PMID: 37180993 PMCID: PMC10174207 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairment occurs in 40-65% of persons with multiple sclerosis and may be related to alterations in glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine how glutamatergic and GABAergic changes relate to cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis in vivo. Sixty persons with multiple sclerosis (mean age 45.5 ± 9.6 years, 48 females, 51 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis) and 22 age-matched healthy controls (45.6 ± 22.0 years, 17 females) underwent neuropsychological testing and MRI. Persons with multiple sclerosis were classified as cognitively impaired when scoring at least 1.5 standard deviations below normative scores on ≥30% of tests. Glutamate and GABA concentrations were determined in the right hippocampus and bilateral thalamus using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. GABA-receptor density was assessed using quantitative [11C]flumazenil positron emission tomography in a subset of participants. Positron emission tomography outcome measures were the influx rate constant (a measure predominantly reflecting perfusion) and volume of distribution, which is a measure of GABA-receptor density. Twenty persons with multiple sclerosis (33%) fulfilled the criteria for cognitive impairment. No differences were observed in glutamate or GABA concentrations between persons with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls, or between cognitively preserved, impaired and healthy control groups. Twenty-two persons with multiple sclerosis (12 cognitively preserved and 10 impaired) and 10 healthy controls successfully underwent [11C]flumazenil positron emission tomography. Persons with multiple sclerosis showed a lower influx rate constant in the thalamus, indicating lower perfusion. For the volume of distribution, persons with multiple sclerosis showed higher values than controls in deep grey matter, reflecting increased GABA-receptor density. When comparing cognitively impaired and preserved patients to controls, the preserved group showed a significantly higher volume of distribution in cortical and deep grey matter and hippocampus. Positive correlations were observed between both positron emission tomography measures and information processing speed in the multiple sclerosis group only. Whereas concentrations of glutamate and GABA did not differ between multiple sclerosis and control nor between cognitively impaired, preserved and control groups, increased GABA-receptor density was observed in preserved persons with multiple sclerosis that was not seen in cognitively impaired patients. In addition, GABA-receptor density correlated to cognition, in particular with information processing speed. This could indicate that GABA-receptor density is upregulated in the cognitively preserved phase of multiple sclerosis as a means to regulate neurotransmission and potentially preserve cognitive functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijn Huiskamp
- Correspondence to: M. Huiskamp Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail:
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Marike R van Lingen
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J W Pouwels
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk R J de Ruiter
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Joep Killestein
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J G Geurts
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke E Hulst
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mank A, van Maurik IS, van Harten AC, Rhodius‐Meester HFM, Teunissen CE, van Berckel BNM, Berkhof J, van der Flier WM, Rijnhart JJM. Life satisfaction across the entire trajectory of Alzheimer's disease: A mediation analysis. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2022; 14:e12389. [PMID: 36579132 PMCID: PMC9780509 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We studied life satisfaction across Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages and studied mobility and meaningful activities as mediators of the associations between these AD stages and life satisfaction. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we included n = 269 amyloid-positive patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. Life satisfaction was measured with the satisfaction with life scale. The mediating role of transportation, work, sports, and hobbies on life satisfaction was examined in single and multiple mediator models. Results Patients with dementia are less satisfied with life compared to SCD and MCI. These differences in life satisfaction are explained by reduced participation in meaningful activities, which in turn, was largely attributable to decreased transportation use. Discussion Our findings suggest that improving access to transportation, therewith allowing participation in meaningful activities help to maintain life satisfaction and may be an important target for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arenda Mank
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, NeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, NeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam Public Health InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S. van Maurik
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, NeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, NeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam Public Health InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Argonde C. van Harten
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, NeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, NeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke F. M. Rhodius‐Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, NeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of Internal MedicineGeriatric Medicine SectionVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, NeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, NeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam Public Health InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, NeurologyAmsterdam UMC location VUmcVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam Neuroscience, NeurodegenerationAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam Public Health InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Judith J. M. Rijnhart
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam Public Health InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Deckers PT, Kronenburg A, van den Berg E, van Schooneveld MM, Vonken EJPA, Otte WM, van Berckel BNM, Yaqub M, Klijn CJM, van der Zwan A, Braun KPJ. Clinical Outcome, Cognition, and Cerebrovascular Reactivity after Surgical Treatment for Moyamoya Vasculopathy: A Dutch Prospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247427. [PMID: 36556043 PMCID: PMC9786028 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It remains unclear whether revascularization of moyamoya vasculopathy (MMV) has a positive effect on cognitive function. In this prospective, single-center study, we investigated the effect of revascularization on cognitive function in patients with MMV. We report clinical and radiological outcome parameters and the associations between clinical determinants and change in neurocognitive functioning. Methods: We consecutively included all MMV patients at a Dutch tertiary referral hospital who underwent pre- and postoperative standardized neuropsychological evaluation, [15O]H2O-PET (including cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR)), MRI, cerebral angiography, and completed standardized questionnaires on clinical outcome and quality of life (QOL). To explore the association between patient characteristics, imaging findings, and change in the z-scores of the cognitive domains, we used multivariable linear- and Bayesian regression analysis. Results: We included 40 patients of whom 35 (27 females, 21 children) were treated surgically. One patient died after surgery, and two withdrew from the study. TIA- and headache frequency and modified Rankin scale (mRS) improved (resp. p = 0.001, 0.019, 0.039). Eleven patients (seven children) developed a new infarct during follow-up (31%), five of which were symptomatic. CVR-scores improved significantly (p < 0.0005). The language domain improved (p = 0.029); other domains remained stable. In adults, there was an improvement in QOL. We could not find an association between change in imaging and cognitive scores. Conclusion: In this cohort of Western MMV patients, TIA frequency, headache, CVR, and mRS improved significantly after revascularization. The language domain significantly improved, while others remained stable. We could not find an association between changes in CVR and cognitive scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Thomas Deckers
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meander Medisch Centrum, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Annick Kronenburg
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Willem M. Otte
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Research, Amsterdam UMC, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Research, Amsterdam UMC, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina J. M. Klijn
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Center for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert van der Zwan
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kees P. J. Braun
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Soliman A, Chang JR, Etminani K, Byttner S, Davidsson A, Martínez-Sanchis B, Camacho V, Bauckneht M, Stegeran R, Ressner M, Agudelo-Cifuentes M, Chincarini A, Brendel M, Rominger A, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Kramberger MG, Trost M, Nicastro N, Frisoni GB, Lemstra AW, Berckel BNMV, Pilotto A, Padovani A, Morbelli S, Aarsland D, Nobili F, Garibotto V, Ochoa-Figueroa M. Adopting transfer learning for neuroimaging: a comparative analysis with a custom 3D convolution neural network model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:318. [PMID: 36476613 PMCID: PMC9727842 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02054-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, neuroimaging with deep learning (DL) algorithms have made remarkable advances in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. However, applying DL in different medical domains is usually challenged by lack of labeled data. To address this challenge, transfer learning (TL) has been applied to use state-of-the-art convolution neural networks pre-trained on natural images. Yet, there are differences in characteristics between medical and natural images, also image classification and targeted medical diagnosis tasks. The purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of specialized and TL in the classification of neurodegenerative disorders using 3D volumes of 18F-FDG-PET brain scans. RESULTS Results show that TL models are suboptimal for classification of neurodegenerative disorders, especially when the objective is to separate more than two disorders. Additionally, specialized CNN model provides better interpretations of predicted diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS TL can indeed lead to superior performance on binary classification in timely and data efficient manner, yet for detecting more than a single disorder, TL models do not perform well. Additionally, custom 3D model performs comparably to TL models for binary classification, and interestingly perform better for diagnosis of multiple disorders. The results confirm the superiority of the custom 3D-CNN in providing better explainable model compared to TL adopted ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Soliman
- Center for Applied Intelligent Systems Research (CAISR), Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
| | - Jose R Chang
- Center for Applied Intelligent Systems Research (CAISR), Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
- National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kobra Etminani
- Center for Applied Intelligent Systems Research (CAISR), Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Stefan Byttner
- Center for Applied Intelligent Systems Research (CAISR), Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Anette Davidsson
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Institution of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Begoña Martínez-Sanchis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging Area, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Valle Camacho
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Roxana Stegeran
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marcus Ressner
- Department of Medical Physics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marc Agudelo-Cifuentes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging Area, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrea Chincarini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Genoa section, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rose Bruffaerts
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU, Leuven, Belgium
- Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Maja Trost
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nicolas Nicastro
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- LANVIE (Laboratoire de Neuroimagerie du Vieillissement), Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- VU Medical Center Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Pilotto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Morbelli
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals and NIMTLab, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Miguel Ochoa-Figueroa
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Institution of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Maurik IS, Broulikova HM, Mank A, Bakker ED, de Wilde A, Bouwman FH, Stephens AW, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM. A more precise diagnosis by means of amyloid PET contributes to delayed institutionalization, lower mortality, and reduced care costs in a tertiary memory clinic setting. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 19:2006-2013. [PMID: 36419238 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aim to study the effect of a more precise diagnosis, by means of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), on institutionalization, mortality, and health-care costs. METHODS Between October 27, 2014 and December 31, 2016, we offered amyloid PET to all patients as part of their diagnostic work-up. Patients who accepted to undergo amyloid PET (n = 449) were propensity score matched with patients without amyloid PET (n = 571, i.e., no PET). Matched groups (both n = 444) were compared on rate of institutionalization, mortality, and health-care costs in the years after diagnosis. RESULTS Amyloid PET patients had a lower risk of institutionalization (10% [n = 45] vs. 21% [n = 92]; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48 [0.33-0.70]) and mortality rate (11% [n = 49] vs. 18% [n = 81]; HR = 0.51 [0.36-0.73]) and lower health-care costs in the years after diagnosis compared to matched no-PET patients (β = -4573.49 [-6524.76 to -2523.74], P-value < 0.001). DISCUSSION A more precise diagnosis in tertiary memory clinic patients positively influenced the endpoints of institutionalization, death, and health-care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid S. van Maurik
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Methodology Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Hana M. Broulikova
- Department of Health Sciences Faculty of Science Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Arenda Mank
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Methodology Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Els D. Bakker
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Arno de Wilde
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Femke H. Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Methodology Amsterdam the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mank A, Rijnhart JJM, van Maurik IS, Jönsson L, Handels R, Bakker ED, Teunissen CE, van Berckel BNM, van Harten AC, Berkhof J, van der Flier WM. A longitudinal study on quality of life along the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14:132. [PMID: 36109800 PMCID: PMC9476356 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-01075-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome from the perspective of patients and their caregivers, in both dementia and pre-dementia stages. Yet, little is known about the long-term changes in QoL over time. We aimed to compare the trajectories of QoL between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative SCD or MCI patients and to evaluate QoL trajectories along the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum of cognitively normal to dementia. METHODS We included longitudinal data of 447 subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 276 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 417 AD dementia patients from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. We compared QoL trajectories (EQ-5D and visual analog scale (VAS)) between (1) amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative SCD or MCI patients and (2) amyloid-positive SCD, MCI, and dementia patients with linear mixed-effect models. The models were adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), education, and EQ-5D scale (3 or 5 level). RESULTS In SCD, amyloid-positive participants had a higher VAS at baseline but showed a steeper decline over time in EQ-5D and VAS than amyloid-negative participants. Also, in MCI, amyloid-positive patients had higher QoL at baseline but subsequently showed a steeper decline in QoL over time compared to amyloid-negative patients. When we compared amyloid-positive patients along the Alzheimer continuum, we found no difference between SCD, MCI, or dementia in baseline QoL, but QoL decreased at a faster rate in the dementia stage compared with the of SCD and MCI stages. CONCLUSIONS QoL decreased at a faster rate over time in amyloid-positive SCD or MCI patients than amyloid-negative patients. QoL decreases over time along the entire AD continuum of SCD, MCI and dementia, with the strongest decrease in dementia patients. Knowledge of QoL trajectories is essential for the future evaluation of treatments in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arenda Mank
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith J M Rijnhart
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S van Maurik
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linus Jönsson
- Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Ron Handels
- Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Els D Bakker
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Argonde C van Harten
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ebenau JL, Visser D, Kroeze LA, van Leeuwenstijn MSSA, van Harten AC, Windhorst AD, Golla SVS, Boellaard R, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, van Berckel BNM, van der Flier WM. Longitudinal change in ATN biomarkers in cognitively normal individuals. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14:124. [PMID: 36057616 PMCID: PMC9440493 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-01069-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biomarkers for amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) have predictive value for clinical progression, but it is not clear how individuals move through these stages. We examined changes in ATN profiles over time, and investigated determinants of change in A status, in a sample of cognitively normal individuals presenting with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). METHODS We included 92 individuals with SCD from the SCIENCe project with [18F]florbetapir PET (A) available at two time points (65 ± 8y, 42% female, MMSE 29 ± 1, follow-up 2.5 ± 0.7y). We additionally used [18F]flortaucipir PET for T and medial temporal atrophy score on MRI for N. Thirty-nine individuals had complete biomarker data at baseline and follow-up, enabling the construction of ATN profiles at two time points. All underwent extensive neuropsychological assessments (follow-up time 4.9 ± 2.8y, median number of visits n = 4). We investigated changes in biomarker status and ATN profiles over time. We assessed which factors predisposed for a change from A- to A+ using logistic regression. We additionally used linear mixed models to assess change from A- to A+, compared to the group that remained A- at follow-up, as predictor for cognitive decline. RESULTS At baseline, 62% had normal AD biomarkers (A-T-N- n = 24), 5% had non-AD pathologic change (A-T-N+ n = 2,) and 33% fell within the Alzheimer's continuum (A+T-N- n = 9, A+T+N- n = 3, A+T+N+ n = 1). Seventeen subjects (44%) changed to another ATN profile over time. Only 6/17 followed the Alzheimer's disease sequence of A → T → N, while 11/17 followed a different order (e.g., reverted back to negative biomarker status). APOE ε4 carriership inferred an increased risk of changing from A- to A+ (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.2-22.8)). Individuals who changed from A- to A+, showed subtly steeper decline on Stroop I (β - 0.03 (SE 0.01)) and Stroop III (- 0.03 (0.01)), compared to individuals who remained A-. CONCLUSION We observed considerable variability in the order of ATN biomarkers becoming abnormal. Individuals who became A+ at follow-up showed subtle decline on tests for attention and executive functioning, confirming clinical relevance of amyloid positivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarith L Ebenau
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Denise Visser
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lior A Kroeze
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mardou S S A van Leeuwenstijn
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Argonde C van Harten
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep V S Golla
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Epidemiology & Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Altomare D, Collij L, Caprioglio C, Scheltens P, van Berckel BNM, Alves IL, Berkhof J, de Gier Y, Garibotto V, Moro C, Poitrine L, Delrieu J, Payoux P, Saint-Aubert L, Molinuevo JL, Grau-Rivera O, Gispert JD, Minguillón C, Fauria K, Sanchez MF, Rădoi A, Drzezga A, Jessen F, Escher C, Zeyen P, Nordberg A, Savitcheva I, Jelic V, Walker Z, Lee HY, Lee L, Demonet JF, Plaza Wuthrich S, Gismondi R, Farrar G, Barkhof F, Stephens AW, Frisoni GB. Description of a European memory clinic cohort undergoing amyloid-PET: The AMYPAD Diagnostic and Patient Management Study. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 19:844-856. [PMID: 35715930 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AMYPAD Diagnostic and Patient Management Study (DPMS) aims to investigate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of amyloid-PET in Europe. Here we present participants' baseline features and discuss the representativeness of the cohort. METHODS Participants with subjective cognitive decline plus (SCD+), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia were recruited in eight European memory clinics from April 16, 2018, to October 30, 2020, and randomized into three arms: ARM1, early amyloid-PET; ARM2, late amyloid-PET; and ARM3, free-choice. RESULTS A total of 840 participants (244 SCD+, 341 MCI, and 255 dementia) were enrolled. Sociodemographic/clinical features did not differ significantly among recruiting memory clinics or with previously reported cohorts. The randomization assigned 35% of participants to ARM1, 32% to ARM2, and 33% to ARM3; cognitive stages were distributed equally across the arms. DISCUSSION The features of AMYPAD-DPMS participants are as expected for a memory clinic population. This ensures the generalizability of future study results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Altomare
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lyduine Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Camilla Caprioglio
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne de Gier
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers (NIMTlab), Geneva University Neurocenter and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Moro
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Léa Poitrine
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Julien Delrieu
- Gérontopôle, Department of Geriatrics, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- Maintain Aging Research team, CERPOP, Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Payoux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Saint-Aubert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), Université de Toulouse, Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Oriol Grau-Rivera
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan-Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolina Minguillón
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Karine Fauria
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Felez Sanchez
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andreea Rădoi
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-2), Molecular Organization of the Brain, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claus Escher
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philip Zeyen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center of Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irina Savitcheva
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Section for Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vesna Jelic
- Cognitive Disorders Clinic, Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital-Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zuzana Walker
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- St. Margaret's Hospital, Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK
| | - Ho-Yun Lee
- St. Margaret's Hospital, Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK
| | - Lean Lee
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Sonia Plaza Wuthrich
- Leenaards Memory Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) - Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | | | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Heeman F, Yaqub M, Hendriks J, van Berckel BNM, Collij LE, Gray KR, Manber R, Wolz R, Garibotto V, Wimberley C, Ritchie C, Barkhof F, Gispert JD, Vállez García D, Lopes Alves I, Lammertsma AA. Impact of cerebral blood flow and amyloid load on SUVR bias. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:29. [PMID: 35553267 PMCID: PMC9098761 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00898-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite its widespread use, the semi-quantitative standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) may be biased compared with the distribution volume ratio (DVR). This bias may be partially explained by changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and is likely to be also dependent on the extent of the underlying amyloid-β (Aβ) burden. This study aimed to compare SUVR with DVR and to evaluate the effects of underlying Aβ burden and CBF on bias in SUVR in mainly cognitively unimpaired participants. Participants were scanned according to a dual-time window protocol, with either [18F]flutemetamol (N = 90) or [18F]florbetaben (N = 31). The validated basisfunction-based implementation of the two-step simplified reference tissue model was used to derive DVR and R1 parametric images, and SUVR was calculated from 90 to 110 min post-injection, all with the cerebellar grey matter as reference tissue. First, linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses were used to compare (regional) SUVR with DVR. Then, generalized linear models were applied to evaluate whether (bias in) SUVR relative to DVR could be explained by R1 for the global cortical average (GCA), precuneus, posterior cingulate, and orbitofrontal region. Results Despite high correlations (GCA: R2 ≥ 0.85), large overestimation and proportional bias of SUVR relative to DVR was observed. Negative associations were observed between both SUVR or SUVRbias and R1, albeit non-significant. Conclusion The present findings demonstrate that bias in SUVR relative to DVR is strongly related to underlying Aβ burden. Furthermore, in a cohort consisting mainly of cognitively unimpaired individuals, the effect of relative CBF on bias in SUVR appears limited. EudraCT Number: 2018-002277-22, registered on: 25-06-2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-022-00898-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Heeman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janine Hendriks
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Garibotto
- NIMTLab, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Catriona Wimberley
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,UCL, Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Centre, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Vállez García
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lorenzini L, Ansems LT, Lopes Alves I, Ingala S, Vállez García D, Tomassen J, Sudre C, Salvadó G, Shekari M, Operto G, Brugulat-Serrat A, Sánchez-Benavides G, ten Kate M, Tijms B, Wink AM, Mutsaerts HJMM, den Braber A, Visser PJ, van Berckel BNM, Gispert JD, Barkhof F, Collij LE, Beteta A, Brugulat A, Cacciaglia R, Cañas A, Deulofeu C, Cumplido I, Dominguez R, Emilio M, Fauria K, Fuentes S, Hernandez L, Huesa G, Huguet J, Marne P, Menchón T, Polo A, Pradas S, Rodriguez-Fernandez B, Sala-Vila A, Sánchez-Benavides G, Soteras A, Vilanova M. Regional associations of white matter hyperintensities and early cortical amyloid pathology. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac150. [PMID: 35783557 PMCID: PMC9246276 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) have a heterogeneous aetiology, associated with both vascular risk factors and amyloidosis due to Alzheimer’s disease. While spatial distribution of both amyloid and WM lesions carry important information for the underlying pathogenic mechanisms, the regional relationship between these two pathologies and their joint contribution to early cognitive deterioration remains largely unexplored.
We included 662 non-demented participants from three Amyloid Imaging to Prevent Alzheimer’s disease (AMYPAD)-affiliated cohorts: EPAD-LCS (N = 176), ALFA+ (N = 310), and EMIF-AD PreclinAD Twin60++ (N = 176). Using PET imaging, cortical amyloid burden was assessed regionally within early accumulating regions (medial orbitofrontal, precuneus, and cuneus) and globally, using the Centiloid method. Regional WMH volume was computed using Bayesian Model Selection. Global associations between WMH, amyloid, and cardiovascular risk scores (Framingham and CAIDE) were assessed using linear models. Partial least square (PLS) regression was used to identify regional associations. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and APOE-e4 status. Individual PLS scores were then related to cognitive performance in 4 domains (attention, memory, executive functioning, and language).
While no significant global association was found, the PLS model yielded two components of interest. In the first PLS component, a fronto-parietal WMH pattern was associated with medial orbitofrontal–precuneal amyloid, vascular risk, and age. Component 2 showed a posterior WMH pattern associated with precuneus-cuneus amyloid, less related to age or vascular risk. Component 1 was associated with lower performance in all cognitive domains, while component 2 only with worse memory.
In a large pre-dementia population, we observed two distinct patterns of regional associations between WMH and amyloid burden, and demonstrated their joint influence on cognitive processes. These two components could reflect the existence of vascular-dependent and -independent manifestations of WMH-amyloid regional association that might be related to distinct primary pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Lorenzini
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Loes T Ansems
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Ingala
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - David Vállez García
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Carole Sudre
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Departments of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science, University College London , UK
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing - University College London , UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering , King’s College London UK
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation , Barcelona , Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation , Barcelona , Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona , Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Gregory Operto
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation , Barcelona , Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona , Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES) , Madrid , Spain
| | - Anna Brugulat-Serrat
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation , Barcelona , Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona , Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES) , Madrid , Spain
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health at the University of California San Francisco , SanFrancisco, California , USA
| | - Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation , Barcelona , Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona , Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad Y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES) , Madrid , Spain
| | - Mara ten Kate
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Betty Tijms
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Henk J M M Mutsaerts
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Department. of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuroscience Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation , Barcelona , Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona , Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra , Barcelona , Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales Y Nanomedicina , Madrid , Spain
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London , London , UK
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tuncel H, Boellaard R, Coomans EM, Hollander-Meeuwsen MD, de Vries EFJ, Glaudemans AWJM, Feltes PK, García DV, Verfaillie SCJ, Wolters EE, Sweeney SP, Ryan JM, Ivarsson M, Lynch BA, Schober P, Scheltens P, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, De Deyn PP, van Berckel BNM, Golla SSV. Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [11C]UCB-J PET. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:3. [PMID: 35072802 PMCID: PMC8786991 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
[11C]UCB-J is a PET radioligand that binds to the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Therefore, [11C]UCB-J PET may serve as an in vivo marker of synaptic integrity. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative accuracy and the 28-day test–retest repeatability (TRT) of various parametric quantitative methods for dynamic [11C]UCB-J studies in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC). Eight HCs and seven AD patients underwent two 60-min dynamic [11C]UCB-J PET scans with arterial sampling over a 28-day interval. Several plasma-input based and reference-region based parametric methods were used to generate parametric images using metabolite corrected plasma activity as input function or white matter semi-ovale as reference region. Different parametric outcomes were compared regionally with corresponding non-linear regression (NLR) estimates. Furthermore, the 28-day TRT was assessed for all parametric methods. Spectral analysis (SA) and Logan graphical analysis showed high correlations with NLR estimates. Receptor parametric mapping (RPM) and simplified reference tissue model 2 (SRTM2) BPND, and reference Logan (RLogan) distribution volume ratio (DVR) regional estimates correlated well with plasma-input derived DVR and SRTM BPND. Among the multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM) methods, MRTM1 had the best correspondence with DVR and SRTM BPND. Among the parametric methods evaluated, spectral analysis (SA) and SRTM2 were the best plasma-input and reference tissue methods, respectively, to obtain quantitatively accurate and repeatable parametric images for dynamic [11C]UCB-J PET.
Collapse
|
27
|
Coomans EM, Tomassen J, Ossenkoppele R, Golla SSV, den Hollander M, Collij LE, Weltings E, van der Landen S, Wolters EE, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, de Geus EJ, Scheltens P, Visser PJ, van Berckel BNM, den Braber A. Genetically identical twins show comparable tau PET load and spatial distribution. Brain 2022; 145:3571-3581. [PMID: 35022652 PMCID: PMC9586544 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Tau accumulation starts during the preclinical phase of Alzheimer’s disease and is closely associated with cognitive decline. For preventive purposes, it is important to identify factors associated with tau accumulation and spread. Studying genetically identical twin-pairs may give insight into genetic and environmental contributions to tau pathology, as similarities in identical twin-pairs largely result from genetic factors, while differences in identical twin-pairs can largely be attributed to non-shared, environmental factors. This study aimed to examine similarities and dissimilarities in a cohort of genetically identical older twin-pairs in (i) tau load; and (ii) spatial distribution of tau, measured with 18F-flortaucipir PET. We selected 78 genetically identical twins (39 pairs; average age 73 ± 6 years), enriched for amyloid-β pathology and APOE ε4 carriership, who underwent dynamic 18F-flortaucipir PET. We extracted binding potentials (BPND) in entorhinal, temporal, widespread neocortical and global regions, and examined within-pair similarities in BPND using age and sex corrected intra-class correlations. Furthermore, we tested whether twin-pairs showed a more similar spatial 18F-flortaucipir distribution compared to non-twin pairs, and whether the participant’s co-twin could be identified solely based on the spatial 18F-flortaucipir distribution. Last, we explored whether environmental (e.g. physical activity, obesity) factors could explain observed differences in twins of a pair in 18F-flortaucipir BPND. On visual inspection, Alzheimer’s disease-like 18F-flortaucipir PET patterns were observed, and although we mainly identified similarities in twin-pairs, some pairs showed strong dissimilarities. 18F-flortaucipir BPND was correlated in twins in the entorhinal (r = 0.40; P = 0.01), neocortical (r = 0.59; P < 0.01) and global (r = 0.56; P < 0.01) regions, but not in the temporal region (r = 0.20; P = 0.10). The 18F-flortaucipir distribution pattern was significantly more similar between twins of the same pair [mean r = 0.27; standard deviation (SD) = 0.09] than between non-twin pairings of participants (mean r = 0.01; SD = 0.10) (P < 0.01), also after correcting for proxies of off-target binding. Based on the spatial 18F-flortaucipir distribution, we could identify with an accuracy of 86% which twins belonged to the same pair. Finally, within-pair differences in 18F-flortaucipir BPND were associated with within-pair differences in depressive symptoms (0.37 < β < 0.56), physical activity (−0.41 < β < −0.42) and social activity (−0.32 < β < −0.36) (all P < 0.05). Overall, identical twin-pairs were comparable in tau load and spatial distribution, highlighting the important role of genetic factors in the accumulation and spreading of tau pathology. Considering also the presence of dissimilarities in tau pathology in identical twin-pairs, our results additionally support a role for (potentially modifiable) environmental factors in the onset of Alzheimer’s disease pathological processes, which may be of interest for future prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M. Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S. V. Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke den Hollander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E. Collij
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Weltings
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie van der Landen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E. Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D. Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Eco J.C. de Geus
- Department of Biological Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biological Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ingala S, Tomassen J, Collij LE, Prent N, van 't Ent D, Ten Kate M, Konijnenberg E, Yaqub M, Scheltens P, de Geus EJC, Teunissen CE, Tijms B, Wink AM, Barkhof F, van Berckel BNM, Visser PJ, den Braber A. Amyloid-driven disruption of default mode network connectivity in cognitively healthy individuals. Brain Commun 2021; 3:fcab201. [PMID: 34617016 PMCID: PMC8490784 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Cortical accumulation of amyloid beta is one of the first events of Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology, and has been suggested to follow a consistent spatiotemporal ordering, starting in the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus and medio-orbitofrontal cortex. These regions overlap with those of the default mode network, a brain network also involved in memory functions. Aberrant default mode network functional connectivity and higher network sparsity have been reported in prodromal and clinical Alzheimer’s disease. We investigated the association between amyloid burden and default mode network connectivity in the preclinical stage of Alzheimer’s disease and its association with longitudinal memory decline. We included 173 participants, in which amyloid burden was assessed both in CSF by the amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, capturing the soluble part of amyloid pathology, and in dynamic PET scans calculating the non-displaceable binding potential in early-stage regions. The default mode network was identified with resting-state functional MRI. Then, we calculated functional connectivity in the default mode network, derived from independent component analysis, and eigenvector centrality, a graph measure recursively defining important nodes on the base of their connection with other important nodes. Memory was tested at baseline, 2- and 4-year follow-up. We demonstrated that higher amyloid burden as measured by both CSF amyloid beta 42/40 ratio and non-displaceable binding potential in the posterior cingulate cortex was associated with lower functional connectivity in the default mode network. The association between amyloid burden (CSF and non-displaceable binding potential in the posterior cingulate cortex) and aberrant default mode network connectivity was confirmed at the voxel level with both functional connectivity and eigenvector centrality measures, and it was driven by voxel clusters localized in the precuneus, cingulate, angular and left middle temporal gyri. Moreover, we demonstrated that functional connectivity in the default mode network predicts longitudinal memory decline synergistically with regional amyloid burden, as measured by non-displaceable binding potential in the posterior cingulate cortex. Taken together, these results suggest that early amyloid beta deposition is associated with aberrant default mode network connectivity in cognitively healthy individuals and that default mode network connectivity markers can be used to identify subjects at risk of memory decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Ingala
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi Prent
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Vesalius, Centre for Neuropsychiatry, GGZ Altrecht, 3447 GM Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis van 't Ent
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuroscience Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara Ten Kate
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elles Konijnenberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eco J C de Geus
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuroscience Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Betty Tijms
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neuroscience Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eikelboom WS, van den Berg E, Singleton EH, Baart SJ, Coesmans M, Leeuwis AE, Teunissen CE, van Berckel BNM, Pijnenburg YAL, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, Papma JM. Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Symptoms Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Associations. Neurology 2021; 97:e1276-e1287. [PMID: 34413181 PMCID: PMC8480405 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives To investigate the prevalence and trajectories of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in relation to cognitive functioning in a cohort of β-amyloid–positive (A+) individuals across the Alzheimer disease (AD) clinical spectrum. Methods In this single-center observational study, we included all individuals who visited the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and had a clinical diagnosis of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or probable AD dementia and were A+. We measured NPS with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), examining total scores and the presence of specific NPI domains. Cognition was assessed across 5 cognitive domains and with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We examined trajectories including model-based trends for NPS and cognitive functioning over time. We used linear mixed models to relate baseline NPI scores to cognitive functioning at baseline (whole-sample) and longitudinal time points (subsample n = 520, mean 1.8 [SD 0.7] years follow-up). Results We included 1,524 A+ individuals from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort with A+ SCD (n = 113), A+ MCI (n = 321), or A+ AD dementia (n = 1,090). NPS were prevalent across all clinical AD stages (≥1 NPS 81.4% in SCD, 81.2% in MCI, 88.7% in dementia; ≥1 clinically relevant NPS 54.0% in SCD, 50.5% in MCI, 66.0% in dementia). Cognitive functioning showed a uniform gradual decline; while in contrast, large intraindividual heterogeneity of NPS was observed over time across all AD groups. At baseline, we found associations between NPS and cognition in dementia that were most pronounced for NPI total scores and MMSE (range β = −0.18 to −0.11, false discovery rate [FDR]–adjusted p < 0.05), while there were no cross-sectional relationships in SCD and MCI (range β = −0.32 to 0.36, all FDR-adjusted p > 0.05). There were no associations between baseline NPS and cognitive functioning over time in any clinical stage (range β = −0.13 to 0.44, all FDR-adjusted p > 0.05). Discussion NPS and cognitive symptoms are both prevalent across the AD clinical spectrum, but show a different evolution during the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem S Eikelboom
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Esther van den Berg
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ellen H Singleton
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sara J Baart
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Michiel Coesmans
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Annebet E Leeuwis
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Janne M Papma
- From the Departments of Neurology (W.S.E., E.v.d.B., J.M.P.), Biostatistics (S.J.B.), and Psychiatry (M.C.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (E.H.S., A.E.L., Y.A.L.P., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T.), and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.N.M.v.B.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wolters EE, Papma JM, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, Weltings E, Groot C, van der Ende EL, Giannini LAA, Tuncel H, Timmers T, Boellaard R, Yaqub M, van Assema DME, Kuijper DA, Segbers M, Rozemuller AJM, Barkhof F, Windhorst AD, van der Flier WM, Pijnenburg YAL, Scheltens P, van Berckel BNM, van Swieten JC, Ossenkoppele R, Seelaar H. [ 18F]Flortaucipir PET Across Various MAPT Mutations in Presymptomatic and Symptomatic Carriers. Neurology 2021; 97:e1017-e1030. [PMID: 34210823 PMCID: PMC8448551 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the [18F]flortaucipir binding distribution across MAPT mutations in presymptomatic and symptomatic carriers. METHODS We compared regional [18F]flortaucipir binding potential (BPND) derived from a 130-minute dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET scan in 9 (pre)symptomatic MAPT mutation carriers (4 with P301L [1 symptomatic], 2 with R406W [1 symptomatic], 1 presymptomatic L315R, 1 presymptomatic S320F, and 1 symptomatic G272V carrier) with 30 cognitively normal controls and 52 patients with Alzheimer disease. RESULTS [18F]Flortaucipir BPND images showed overall highest binding in the symptomatic carriers. This was most pronounced in the symptomatic R406W carrier in whom tau binding exceeded the normal control range in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, amygdala, temporal, parietal, and frontal lobe. Elevated medial temporal lobe BPND was observed in a presymptomatic R406W carrier. The single symptomatic carrier and 1 of the 3 presymptomatic P301L carriers showed elevated [18F]flortaucipir BPND in the insula, parietal, and frontal lobe compared to controls. The symptomatic G272V carrier exhibited a widespread elevated cortical BPND, with at neuropathologic examination a combination of 3R pathology and encephalitis. The L315R presymptomatic mutation carrier showed higher frontal BPND compared to controls. The BPND values of the S320F presymptomatic mutation carrier fell within the range of controls. CONCLUSION Presymptomatic MAPT mutation carriers already showed subtle elevated tau binding, whereas symptomatic MAPT mutation carriers showed a more marked increase in [18F]flortaucipir BPND. Tau deposition was most pronounced in R406W MAPT (pre)symptomatic mutation carriers, which is associated with both 3R and 4R tau accumulation. Thus, [18F]flortaucipir may serve as an early biomarker for MAPT mutation carriers in mutations that cause 3R/4R tauopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E Wolters
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden.
| | - Janne M Papma
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Denise Visser
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Emma Weltings
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Colin Groot
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Emma L van der Ende
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Lucia A A Giannini
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Tessa Timmers
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Danielle M E van Assema
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Dennis A Kuijper
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Marcel Segbers
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Annemieke J M Rozemuller
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - John C van Swieten
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Harro Seelaar
- From the Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.E.W., S.C.J.V., D.V., E.W., H.T., T.T., R.B., M.Y., F.B., A.D.W., B.N.M.v.B.) and Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology (E.E.W., C.G., W.M.v.d.F., Y.A.L.P., P.S., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC; Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center (J.M.P., E.L.v.d.E., L.A.A.G., J.C.v.S., H.S.), and Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (D.M.E.v.A., D.A.K., M.S.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Department of Pathology (A.J.M.R.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL, London, UK; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tuncel H, Visser D, Yaqub M, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Effect of Shortening the Scan Duration on Quantitative Accuracy of [ 18F]Flortaucipir Studies. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:604-613. [PMID: 33496930 PMCID: PMC8277654 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01581-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) protocols allow for accurate quantification of [18F]flortaucipir-specific binding. However, dynamic acquisitions can be challenging given the long required scan duration of 130 min. The current study assessed the effect of shorter scan protocols for [18F]flortaucipir on its quantitative accuracy. PROCEDURES Two study cohorts with Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC) were included. All subjects underwent a 130-min dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET scan consisting of two parts (0-60/80-130 min) post-injection. Arterial sampling was acquired during scanning of the first cohort only. For the second cohort, a second PET scan was acquired within 1-4 weeks of the first PET scan to assess test-retest repeatability (TRT). Three alternative time intervals were explored for the second part of the scan: 80-120, 80-110 and 80-100 min. Furthermore, the first part of the scan was also varied: 0-50, 0-40 and 0-30 min time intervals were assessed. The gap in the reference TACs was interpolated using four different interpolation methods: population-based input function 2T4k_VB (POP-IP_2T4k_VB), cubic, linear and exponential. Regional binding potential (BPND) and relative tracer delivery (R1) values estimated using simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) and/or receptor parametric mapping (RPM). The different scan protocols were compared to the respective values estimated using the original scan acquisition. In addition, TRT of the RPM BPND and R1 values estimated using the optimal shortest scan duration was also assessed. RESULTS RPM BPND and R1 obtained using 0-30/80-100 min scan and POP-IP_2T4k_VB reference region interpolation had an excellent correlation with the respective parametric values estimated using the original scan duration (r2 > 0.95). The TRT of RPM BPND and R1 using the shortest scan duration was - 1 ± 5 % and - 1 ± 6 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that [18F]flortaucipir PET scan can be acquired with sufficient quantitative accuracy using only 50 min of dual-time-window scanning time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Babapour Mofrad R, Scheltens P, Kim S, Kang S, Youn YC, An SSA, Tomassen J, van Berckel BNM, Visser PJ, van der Flier WM, Teunissen CE. Plasma amyloid-β oligomerization assay as a pre-screening test for amyloid status. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13:133. [PMID: 34311775 PMCID: PMC8311929 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00873-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed the performance of plasma amyloid oligomerization tendency (OAβ) as a marker for abnormal amyloid status. Additionally, we examined long-term storage effects on plasma OAβ. METHODS We included 399 subjects regardless of clinical diagnosis from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort and European Medical Information Framework for AD project (age, 63.8 ± 6.6; 44% female). Amyloid status was determined by visual read on positron emission tomography (PET; nabnormal = 206). Plasma OAβ was measured using the multimer detection system (MDS). Long-term storage effects on MDS-OAβ were assessed using general linear models. Associations between plasma MDS-OAβ and Aβ-PET status were assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses. Correlations between plasma MDS-OAβ and CSF biomarker levels were evaluated using Pearson correlation analyses. RESULTS MDS-OAβ was higher in individuals with abnormal amyloid, and it identified abnormal Aβ-PET with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81), especially in samples with a storage duration < 4 years. Combining APOEe4 and age with plasma MDS-OAβ revealed an AUC of 81% for abnormal amyloid PET status (95% CI, 74-87%). Plasma MDS-OAβ correlated negatively with MMSE (r = - 0.29, p < .01) and CSF Aβ42 (r = - 0.20, p < 0.05) and positively with CSF Tau (r = 0.20, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Plasma MDS-OAβ combined with APOEe4 and age accurately identifies brain amyloidosis in a large Aβ-confirmed population. Using plasma MDS-OAβ as a screener reduced the costs and number of PET scans needed to screen for amyloidosis, which is relevant for clinical trials. Additionally, plasma MDS-OAβ levels appeared affected by long-term storage duration, which could be of interest for others measuring plasma Aβ biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosha Babapour Mofrad
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology Amsterdam, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology Amsterdam, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - SangYun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungmin Kang
- Department of Research and Development, PeopleBio Inc, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Chul Youn
- Department of Neurology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Soo A An
- Department of Bionanotechnology, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology Amsterdam, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology Amsterdam, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology Amsterdam, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ulugut H, Stek S, Wagemans LEE, Jutten RJ, Keulen MA, Bouwman FH, Prins ND, Lemstra AW, Krudop W, Teunissen CE, van Berckel BNM, Ossenkoppele R, Barkhof F, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Pijnenburg YAL. The natural history of primary progressive aphasia: beyond aphasia. J Neurol 2021; 269:1375-1385. [PMID: 34216263 PMCID: PMC8857134 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10689-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is divided into three prototypical subtypes that are all characterized by their single core symptom of aphasia. Although later in their course, other cognitive, behavioral, and motor domains may become involved, little is known about the progression profile of each subtype relative to the other subtypes. METHODS In this longitudinal retrospective cohort study, based on the recent biomarker-supported diagnostic criteria, 24 subjects diagnosed with semantic variant (svPPA), 22 with non-fluent variant (nfvPPA), and 18 with logopenic variant (lvPPA) were collected and followed up for 1-6 years. Symptom distribution, cognitive test and neuropsychiatric inventory scores, and progression into another syndrome were assessed. RESULTS Over time, lvPPA progressed with broader language problems (PPA-extended) and nfvPPA progressed to mutism, whereas semantic impairment remained the major problem in svPPA. Apart from linguistic problems, svPPA developed pronounced behavioral disturbances, whereas lvPPA exhibited a greater cognitive decline. By contrast, in nfvPPA motor deficits were more common. Furthermore, within 5 years (IQR = 2.5) after clinical onset, 65.6% of the patients additionally fulfilled the clinical criteria for another neurodegenerative syndrome (PPA-plus). Fourteen out of 24 (58%) svPPA patients additionally met the diagnostic criteria of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (5.1 years, IQR = 1.1), whereas the clinical features of 15/18 (83%) lvPPA patients were consistent with Alzheimer disease dementia (4.5 years IQR = 3.4). Furthermore, 12/22 (54%) of the subjects with the nfvPPA progressed to meet the diagnostic criteria of corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, or motor neuron disease (5.1 years IQR = 3.4). DISCUSSION Despite aphasia being the initial and unique hallmark of the syndrome, our longitudinal results showed that PPA is not a language limited disorder and progression differs widely for each subtype, both with respect to the nature of symptoms and disease duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hulya Ulugut
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Simone Stek
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne E E Wagemans
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos J Jutten
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Antoinette Keulen
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke H Bouwman
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels D Prins
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Welmoed Krudop
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurological Laboratory Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Willemse EAJ, Tijms BM, van Berckel BNM, Le Bastard N, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Teunissen CE. Comparing CSF amyloid-beta biomarker ratios for two automated immunoassays, Elecsys and Lumipulse, with amyloid PET status. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2021; 13:e12182. [PMID: 33969174 PMCID: PMC8088096 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluated for two novel automated biomarker assays how cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ)1- 42-ratios improved the concordance with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity compared to Aβ1- 42 alone. METHODS We selected 288 individuals from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort across the Alzheimer's disease clinical spectrum when they had both CSF and amyloid PET visual read available, regardless of diagnosis. CSF Aβ1- 42, phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and total tau (t-tau) were measured with Elecsys and Lumipulse assays, and Aβ1-40 with Lumipulse. CSF cut-points were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for amyloid PET positivity. RESULTS For both Elecsys and Lumipulse the p-tau/Aβ1- 42, Aβ1- 42/Aβ1- 40, and t-tau/Aβ1- 42 ratios showed similarly good concordance with amyloid PET (Elecsys: 93,90,90%; Lumipulse: 94,92,90%) and were higher than Aβ1- 42 alone (Elecsys 85%; Lumipulse 84%). DISCUSSION Biomarker ratios p-tau/Aβ1- 42, Aβ1- 42/Aβ1- 40, t-tau/Aβ1- 42 on two automated platforms show similar optimal concordance with amyloid PET in a memory clinic cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline A. J. Willemse
- Department of Clinical ChemistryNeurochemistry LaboratoryAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Betty M. Tijms
- Department of NeurologyAlzheimer CenterAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Department of NeurologyAlzheimer CenterAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of NeurologyAlzheimer CenterAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Department of Clinical ChemistryNeurochemistry LaboratoryAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Deckers PT, van Hoek W, Kronenburg A, Yaqub M, Siero JCW, Bhogal AA, van Berckel BNM, van der Zwan A, Braun KPJ. Contralateral improvement of cerebrovascular reactivity and TIA frequency after unilateral revascularization surgery in moyamoya vasculopathy. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 30:102684. [PMID: 34215154 PMCID: PMC8102652 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Contralateral cerebrovascular reactivity may improve after unilateral surgery in moyamoya. TIA frequency from the contralateral hemisphere can decrease after unilateral moyamoya surgery. These findings support staged rather than direct bilateral surgery in moyamoya.
Objective Moyamoya vasculopathy is a rare, often bilateral disease characterized by progressive stenosis and occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery, leading to a progressive deterioration of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and increased risk of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), infarction and hemorrhage. Surgical revascularization is a widely accepted symptomatic treatment, often performed bilaterally in one or two stages. To possibly further optimize treatment strategy, we investigated the effect of unilateral revascularization surgery on the CVR of, and TIA frequency originating from, the contralateral hemisphere. Methods From our database of 143 moyamoya vasculopathy patients we selected those with bilateral disease, who underwent hemodynamic imaging ([15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET)-CT with acetazolamide challenge) before and 14 months (median) after unilateral revascularization. We evaluated CVR in three regions per hemisphere, and averaged these per hemisphere for statistical comparison. Conservatively treated patients were showed as a comparison group. To examine TIA frequency, we selected patients who presented with TIAs that (also) originated from the contralateral – not to be operated – hemisphere. We scored changes in CVR and TIA frequency of the ipsilateral and contralateral hemisphere over time. Results Seven surgical and seven conservative patients were included for CVR comparison. Of the 20 scored contralateral regions in the surgical group, 15 showed improved CVR after unilateral revascularization, while 5 remained stable. The averaged scores improved significantly for both hemispheres. In conservatively treated patients, however, only 3 of the 20 scored regions improved in the least-affected (contralateral) hemispheres, and 9 deteriorated. From the 6 patients with contralateral TIAs at presentation, 4 had a decreased TIA frequency originating from the contralateral hemisphere after unilateral surgery, while 2 patients remained stable. Conclusion Both CVR and TIA frequency in the contralateral hemisphere can improve after unilateral revascularization surgery in bilateral MMV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter T Deckers
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Wytse van Hoek
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annick Kronenburg
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen C W Siero
- Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Utrecht Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht the Netherlands; Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alex A Bhogal
- Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Utrecht Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Albert van der Zwan
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kees P J Braun
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Heeman F, Hendriks J, Lopes Alves I, Tolboom N, van Berckel BNM, Yaqub M, Lammertsma AA. Test-Retest Variability of Relative Tracer Delivery Rate as Measured by [ 11C]PiB. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:335-339. [PMID: 33884565 PMCID: PMC8099850 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01606-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Moderate-to-high correlations have been reported between the [11C]PiB PET-derived relative tracer delivery rate R1 and relative CBF as measured using [15O]H2O PET, supporting its use as a proxy of relative CBF. As longitudinal PET studies become more common for measuring treatment efficacy or disease progression, it is important to know the intrinsic variability of R1. The purpose of the present study was to determine this through a retrospective data analysis. Procedures Test-retest data belonging to twelve participants, who underwent two 90 min [11C]PiB PET scans, were retrospectively included. The voxel-based implementation of the two-step simplified reference tissue model with cerebellar grey matter as reference tissue was used to compute R1 images. Next, test-retest variability was calculated, and test and retest R1 measures were compared using linear mixed effect models and a Bland-Altman analysis. Results Test-retest variability was low across regions (max. 5.8 %), and test and retest measures showed high, significant correlations (R2=0.92, slope=0.98) and a negligible bias (0.69±3.07 %). Conclusions In conclusion, the high precision of [11C]PiB R1 suggests suitable applicability for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Heeman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Janine Hendriks
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lopes Alves I, Heeman F, Collij LE, Salvadó G, Tolboom N, Vilor-Tejedor N, Markiewicz P, Yaqub M, Cash D, Mormino EC, Insel PS, Boellaard R, van Berckel BNM, Lammertsma AA, Barkhof F, Gispert JD. Strategies to reduce sample sizes in Alzheimer's disease primary and secondary prevention trials using longitudinal amyloid PET imaging. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13:82. [PMID: 33875021 PMCID: PMC8056524 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00819-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detecting subtle-to-moderate biomarker changes such as those in amyloid PET imaging becomes increasingly relevant in the context of primary and secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This work aimed to determine if and when distribution volume ratio (DVR; derived from dynamic imaging) and regional quantitative values could improve statistical power in AD prevention trials. METHODS Baseline and annualized % change in [11C]PIB SUVR and DVR were computed for a global (cortical) and regional (early) composite from scans of 237 cognitively unimpaired subjects from the OASIS-3 database ( www.oasis-brains.org ). Bland-Altman and correlation analyses were used to assess the relationship between SUVR and DVR. General linear models and linear mixed effects models were used to determine effects of age, sex, and APOE-ε4 carriership on baseline and longitudinal amyloid burden. Finally, differences in statistical power of SUVR and DVR (cortical or early composite) were assessed considering three anti-amyloid trial scenarios: secondary prevention trials including subjects with (1) intermediate-to-high (Centiloid > 20.1), or (2) intermediate (20.1 < Centiloid ≤ 49.4) amyloid burden, and (3) a primary prevention trial focusing on subjects with low amyloid burden (Centiloid ≤ 20.1). Trial scenarios were set to detect 20% reduction in accumulation rates across the whole population and in APOE-ε4 carriers only. RESULTS Although highly correlated to DVR (ρ = .96), cortical SUVR overestimated DVR cross-sectionally and in annual % change. In secondary prevention trials, DVR required 143 subjects per arm, compared with 176 for SUVR. Both restricting inclusion to individuals with intermediate amyloid burden levels or to APOE-ε4 carriers alone further reduced sample sizes. For primary prevention, SUVR required less subjects per arm (n = 855) compared with DVR (n = 1508) and the early composite also provided considerable sample size reductions (n = 855 to n = 509 for SUVR, n = 1508 to n = 734 for DVR). CONCLUSION Sample sizes in AD secondary prevention trials can be reduced by the acquisition of dynamic PET scans and/or by restricting inclusion to subjects with intermediate amyloid burden or to APOE-ε4 carriers only. Using a targeted early composite only leads to reductions of sample size requirements in primary prevention trials. These findings support strategies to enable smaller Proof-of-Concept Phase II clinical trials to better streamline drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Natàlia Vilor-Tejedor
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pawel Markiewicz
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Cash
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth C Mormino
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Philip S Insel
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Heeman F, Yaqub M, Hendriks J, Bader I, Barkhof F, Gispert JD, van Berckel BNM, Lopes Alves I, Lammertsma AA. Parametric imaging of dual-time window [ 18F]flutemetamol and [ 18F]florbetaben studies. Neuroimage 2021; 234:117953. [PMID: 33762215 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimal pharmacokinetic models for quantifying amyloid beta (Aβ) burden using both [18F]flutemetamol and [18F]florbetaben scans have previously been identified at a region of interest (ROI) level. The purpose of this study was to determine optimal quantitative methods for parametric analyses of [18F]flutemetamol and [18F]florbetaben scans. Forty-six participants were scanned on a PET/MR scanner using a dual-time window protocol and either [18F]flutemetamol (N=24) or [18F]florbetaben (N=22). The following parametric approaches were used to derive DVR estimates: reference Logan (RLogan), receptor parametric mapping (RPM), two-step simplified reference tissue model (SRTM2) and multilinear reference tissue models (MRTM0, MRTM1, MRTM2), all with cerebellar grey matter as reference tissue. In addition, a standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated for the 90-110 min post injection interval. All parametric images were assessed visually. Regional outcome measures were compared with those from a validated ROI method, i.e. DVR derived using RLogan. Visually, RPM, and SRTM2 performed best across tracers and, in addition to SUVR, provided highest AUC values for differentiating between Aβ-positive vs Aβ-negative scans ([18F]flutemetamol: range AUC=0.96-0.97 [18F]florbetaben: range AUC=0.83-0.85). Outcome parameters of most methods were highly correlated with the reference method (R2≥0.87), while lowest correlation were observed for MRTM2 (R2=0.71-0.80). Furthermore, bias was low (≤5%) and independent of underlying amyloid burden for MRTM0 and MRTM1. The optimal parametric method differed per evaluated aspect; however, the best compromise across aspects was found for MRTM0 followed by SRTM2, for both tracers. SRTM2 is the preferred method for parametric imaging because, in addition to its good performance, it has the advantage of providing a measure of relative perfusion (R1), which is useful for measuring disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Heeman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janine Hendriks
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ilona Bader
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL, Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Centre, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Konijnenberg E, Tomassen J, den Braber A, Ten Kate M, Yaqub M, Mulder SD, Nivard MG, Vanderstichele H, Lammertsma AA, Teunissen CE, van Berckel BNM, Boomsma DI, Scheltens P, Tijms BM, Visser PJ. Onset of Preclinical Alzheimer Disease in Monozygotic Twins. Ann Neurol 2021; 89:987-1000. [PMID: 33583080 PMCID: PMC8251701 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective The present work was undertaken to study the genetic contribution to the start of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with amyloid and tau biomarkers in cognitively intact older identical twins. Methods We studied in 96 monozygotic twin‐pairs relationships between amyloid‐beta (Aβ) aggregation as measured by the Aβ1–42/1–40 ratio in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; n = 126) and positron emission tomography (PET, n = 194), and CSF markers for Aβ production (beta‐secretase 1, Aβ1–40, and Aβ1–38) and CSF tau. Associations among markers were tested with generalized estimating equations including a random effect for twin status, adjusted for age, gender, and apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype. We used twin analyses to determine relative contributions of genetic and/or environmental factors to AD pathophysiological processes. Results Twenty‐seven individuals (14%) had an abnormal amyloid PET, and 14 twin‐pairs (15%) showed discordant amyloid PET scans. Within twin‐pairs, Aβ production markers and total‐tau (t‐tau) levels strongly correlated (r range = 0.73–0.86, all p < 0.0001), and Aβ aggregation markers and 181‐phosphorylated‐tau (p‐tau) levels correlated moderately strongly (r range = 0.50–0.64, all p < 0.0001). Cross‐twin cross‐trait analysis showed that Aβ1–38 in one twin correlated with Aβ1–42/1–40 ratios, and t‐tau and p‐tau levels in their cotwins (r range = −0.28 to 0.58, all p < .007). Within‐pair differences in Aβ production markers related to differences in tau levels (r range = 0.49–0.61, all p < 0.0001). Twin discordance analyses suggest that Aβ production and tau levels show coordinated increases in very early AD. Interpretation Our results suggest a substantial genetic/shared environmental background contributes to both Aβ and tau increases, suggesting that modulation of environmental risk factors may aid in delaying the onset of AD pathophysiological processes. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:987–1000
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elles Konijnenberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mara Ten Kate
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra D Mulder
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel G Nivard
- Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo Vanderstichele
- Biomarkable bv, working for this study on behalf of ADx NeuroSciences, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dorret I Boomsma
- Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Instutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Collij LE, Salvadó G, Shekari M, Lopes Alves I, Reimand J, Wink AM, Zwan M, Niñerola-Baizán A, Perissinotti A, Scheltens P, Ikonomovic MD, Smith APL, Farrar G, Molinuevo JL, Barkhof F, Buckley CJ, van Berckel BNM, Gispert JD. Visual assessment of [ 18F]flutemetamol PET images can detect early amyloid pathology and grade its extent. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2169-2182. [PMID: 33615397 PMCID: PMC8175297 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05174-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the sensitivity of visual read (VR) to detect early amyloid pathology and the overall utility of regional VR. Methods [18F]Flutemetamol PET images of 497 subjects (ALFA+ N = 352; ADC N = 145) were included. Scans were visually assessed according to product guidelines, recording the number of positive regions (0–5) and a final negative/positive classification. Scans were quantified using the standard and regional Centiloid (CL) method. The agreement between VR-based classification and published CL-based cut-offs for early (CL = 12) and established (CL = 30) pathology was determined. An optimal CL cut-off maximizing Youden’s index was derived. Global and regional CL quantification was compared to VR. Finally, 28 post-mortem cases from the [18F]flutemetamol phase III trial were included to assess the percentage agreement between VR and neuropathological classification of neuritic plaque density. Results VR showed excellent agreement against CL = 12 (κ = .89, 95.2%) and CL = 30 (κ = .88, 95.4%) cut-offs. ROC analysis resulted in an optimal CL = 17 cut-off against VR (sensitivity = 97.9%, specificity = 97.8%). Each additional positive VR region corresponded to a clear increase in global CL. Regional VR was also associated with regional CL quantification. Compared to mCERADSOT-based classification (i.e., any region mCERADSOT > 1.5), VR was in agreement in 89.3% of cases, with 13 true negatives, 12 true positives, and 3 false positives (FP). Regional sparse-to-moderate neuritic and substantial diffuse Aβ plaque was observed in all FP cases. Regional VR was also associated with regional plaque density. Conclusion VR is an appropriate method for assessing early amyloid pathology and that grading the extent of visual amyloid positivity could present clinical value. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-020-05174-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Juhan Reimand
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.,Radiology Centre, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marissa Zwan
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aida Niñerola-Baizán
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona & Biomedical Research Networking Center of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Perissinotti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona & Biomedical Research Networking Center of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Milos D Ikonomovic
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh HS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Centre for Medical Image Computing, and Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | | | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1108 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain. .,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain. .,Alzheimer Prevention Program, BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), C/ Wellington, 30, 08005, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Coomans EM, Schoonhoven DN, Tuncel H, Verfaillie SCJ, Wolters EE, Boellaard R, Ossenkoppele R, den Braber A, Scheper W, Schober P, Sweeney SP, Ryan JM, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Golla SSV, Hillebrand A, Gouw AA, van Berckel BNM. In vivo tau pathology is associated with synaptic loss and altered synaptic function. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13:35. [PMID: 33546722 PMCID: PMC7866464 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00772-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mechanism of synaptic loss in Alzheimer's disease is poorly understood and may be associated with tau pathology. In this combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we aimed to investigate spatial associations between regional tau pathology ([18F]flortaucipir PET), synaptic density (synaptic vesicle 2A [11C]UCB-J PET) and synaptic function (MEG) in Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Seven amyloid-positive Alzheimer's disease subjects from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort underwent dynamic 130-min [18F]flortaucipir PET, dynamic 60-min [11C]UCB-J PET with arterial sampling and 2 × 5-min resting-state MEG measurement. [18F]flortaucipir- and [11C]UCB-J-specific binding (binding potential, BPND) and MEG spectral measures (relative delta, theta and alpha power; broadband power; and peak frequency) were assessed in cortical brain regions of interest. Associations between regional [18F]flortaucipir BPND, [11C]UCB-J BPND and MEG spectral measures were assessed using Spearman correlations and generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS Across subjects, higher regional [18F]flortaucipir uptake was associated with lower [11C]UCB-J uptake. Within subjects, the association between [11C]UCB-J and [18F]flortaucipir depended on within-subject neocortical tau load; negative associations were observed when neocortical tau load was high, gradually changing into opposite patterns with decreasing neocortical tau burden. Both higher [18F]flortaucipir and lower [11C]UCB-J uptake were associated with altered synaptic function, indicative of slowing of oscillatory activity, most pronounced in the occipital lobe. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that in Alzheimer's disease, tau pathology is closely associated with reduced synaptic density and synaptic dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Deborah N Schoonhoven
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiep Scheper
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Department of Functional Genomics, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schober
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Hillebrand
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alida A Gouw
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bauckneht M, Chincarini A, Brendel M, Rominger A, Beyer L, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Kramberger MG, Trost M, Garibotto V, Nicastro N, Frisoni GB, Lemstra AW, van Berckel BNM, Pilotto A, Padovani A, Ochoa-Figueroa MA, Davidsson A, Camacho V, Peira E, Arnaldi D, Pardini M, Donegani MI, Raffa S, Miceli A, Sambuceti G, Aarsland D, Nobili F, Morbelli S. Associations among education, age, and the dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) metabolic pattern: A European-DLB consortium project. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17:1277-1286. [PMID: 33528089 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the influence of education as a proxy of cognitive reserve and age on the dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) metabolic pattern. METHODS Brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and clinical/demographic information were available in 169 probable DLB patients included in the European DLB-consortium database. Principal component analysis identified brain regions relevant to local data variance. A linear regression model was applied to generate age- and education-sensitive maps corrected for Mini-Mental State Examination score, sex (and either education or age). RESULTS Age negatively covaried with metabolism in bilateral middle and superior frontal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate, reducing the expression of the DLB-typical cingulate island sign (CIS). Education negatively covaried with metabolism in the left inferior parietal cortex and precuneus (making the CIS more prominent). DISCUSSION These findings point out the importance of tailoring interpretation of DLB biomarkers considering the concomitant effect of individual, non-disease-related variables such as age and cognitive reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Chincarini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Genoa Section, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rose Bruffaerts
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Trost
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and NIMTLab, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Nicastro
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- LANVIE (Laboratoire de Neuroimagerie du Vieillissement), Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Pilotto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.,Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation Centre, FERB ONLUS-S, Isidoro Hospital, Trescore Balneario, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Miguel A Ochoa-Figueroa
- Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anette Davidsson
- Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Valle Camacho
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrico Peira
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Genoa Section, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Dario Arnaldi
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Clinical Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Pardini
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Clinical Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Raffa
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Miceli
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianmario Sambuceti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Clinical Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of dementia worldwide places a high demand on healthcare providers to perform a diagnostic work-up in relatively early stages of the disease, given that the pathologic process usually begins decades before symptoms are evident. Structural imaging is recommended to rule out other disorders and can only provide diagnosis in a late stage with limited specificity. Where PET imaging previously focused on the spatial pattern of hypometabolism, the past decade has seen the development of novel tracers to demonstrate characteristic protein abnormalities. Molecular imaging using PET/SPECT is able to show amyloid and tau deposition in Alzheimer disease and dopamine depletion in parkinsonian disorders starting decades before symptom onset. Novel tracers for neuroinflammation and synaptic density are being developed to further unravel the molecular pathologic characteristics of dementia disorders. In this article, the authors review the current status of established and emerging PET tracers in a diagnostic setting and also their value as prognostic markers in research studies and outcome measures for clinical trials in Alzheimer disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor L Villemagne
- From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (V.L.V.); Department of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (V.L.V.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (F.B., B.N.M.v.B.); UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, England (F.B.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (V.G.); Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.); and Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.)
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (V.L.V.); Department of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (V.L.V.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (F.B., B.N.M.v.B.); UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, England (F.B.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (V.G.); Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.); and Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.)
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (V.L.V.); Department of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (V.L.V.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (F.B., B.N.M.v.B.); UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, England (F.B.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (V.G.); Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.); and Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.)
| | - Susan M Landau
- From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (V.L.V.); Department of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (V.L.V.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (F.B., B.N.M.v.B.); UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, England (F.B.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (V.G.); Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.); and Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.)
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (V.L.V.); Department of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (V.L.V.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (F.B., B.N.M.v.B.); UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, England (F.B.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (V.G.); Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.); and Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.)
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (V.L.V.); Department of Medicine, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (V.L.V.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (F.B., B.N.M.v.B.); UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, England (F.B.); Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland (V.G.); Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif (S.M.L.); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.); and Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (A.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Vries BM, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, Verfaillie SCJ, Schuit RC, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Windhorst AD, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [ 18F]Flortaucipir and [ 18F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:550-559. [PMID: 33443720 PMCID: PMC8277631 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) is commonly applied for the quantification of brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies, particularly because it avoids arterial cannulation. SRTM requires a validated reference region which is obtained by baseline-blocking or displacement studies. Once a reference region is validated, the use should be verified for each new subject. This verification normally requires volume of distribution (VT) of a reference region. However, performing dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not always possible, specifically in elderly subjects and in advanced disease stages. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of non-invasive standardised uptake value (SUV) approaches, in comparison to VT, as a verification of the previously validated grey matter cerebellum reference region for [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls. Procedures Dynamic 130-min [18F]flortaucipir PET scans obtained from nineteen subjects (10 AD patients) and 90-min [18F]florbetapir dynamic scans obtained from fourteen subjects (8 AD patients) were included. Regional VT’s were estimated for both tracers and were considered the standard verification of the previously validated reference region. Non-invasive SUVs corrected for body weight (SUVBW), lean body mass (SUL), and body surface area (SUVBSA) were obtained by using later time intervals of the dynamic scans. Simulations were also performed to assess the effect of flow and specific binding (BPND) on the SUVs. Results A low SUV corresponded well with a low VT for both [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir. Simulation confirmed that SUVs were only slightly affected by flow changes and that increases in SUV were predominantly determined by the presence of specific binding. Conclusions In situations where dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not possible, a low SUV(80–100 min) for [18F]flortaucipir and a low SUV(50–70 min) for [18F]florbetapir may be used as indication for absence of specific binding in the grey matter cerebellum reference region. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart M de Vries
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pelkmans W, Legdeur N, Ten Kate M, Barkhof F, Yaqub MM, Holstege H, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Visser PJ, Tijms BM. Amyloid-β, cortical thickness, and subsequent cognitive decline in cognitively normal oldest-old. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2021; 8:348-358. [PMID: 33421355 PMCID: PMC7886045 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relationship between amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposition and markers of brain structure on cognitive decline in oldest‐old individuals with initial normal cognition. Methods We studied cognitive functioning in four domains at baseline and change over time in fifty‐seven cognitively intact individuals from the EMIF‐AD 90+ study. Predictors were Aβ status determined by [18F]‐flutemetamol PET (normal = Aβ − vs. abnormal = Aβ+), cortical thickness in 34 regions and hippocampal volume. Mediation analyses were performed to test whether effects of Aβ on cognitive decline were mediated by atrophy of specific anatomical brain areas. Results Subjects had a mean age of 92.7 ± 2.9 years, of whom 19 (33%) were Aβ+. Compared to Aβ−, Aβ+ individuals showed steeper decline on memory (β ± SE = −0.26 ± 0.09), and processing speed (β ± SE = −0.18 ± 0.08) performance over 1.5 years (P < 0.05). Furthermore, medial and lateral temporal lobe atrophy was associated with steeper decline in memory and language across individuals. Mediation analyses revealed that part of the memory decline observed in Aβ+ individuals was mediated through parahippocampal atrophy. Interpretation These results show that Aβ abnormality even in the oldest old with initially normal cognition is not part of normal aging, but is associated with a decline in cognitive functioning. Other pathologies may also contribute to decline in the oldest old as cortical thickness predicted cognitive decline similarly in individuals with and without Aβ pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiesje Pelkmans
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Legdeur
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara Ten Kate
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, UCL, London, UK
| | - Maqsood M Yaqub
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henne Holstege
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology I Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Reimand J, Groot C, Teunissen CE, Windhorst AD, Boellaard R, Barkhof F, Nazarenko S, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, Ossenkoppele R, Bouwman F. Why Is Amyloid-β PET Requested After Performing CSF Biomarkers? J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 73:559-569. [PMID: 31796674 PMCID: PMC7081099 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 are considered interchangeable for clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical reasoning for requesting additional amyloid-β PET after performing CSF biomarkers. METHODS We retrospectively identified 72 memory clinic patients who underwent amyloid-β PET after CSF biomarkers analysis for clinical diagnostic evaluation between 2011 and 2019. We performed patient chart reviews to identify factors which led to additional amyloid-β PET. Additionally, we assessed accordance with appropriate-use-criteria (AUC) for amyloid-β PET. RESULTS Mean patient age was 62.0 (SD = 8.1) and mean Mini-Mental State Exam score was 23.6 (SD = 3.8). CSF analysis conflicting with the clinical diagnosis was the most frequent reason for requesting an amyloid-β PET scan (n = 53, 74%), followed by incongruent MRI (n = 16, 22%), unusual clinical presentation (n = 11, 15%) and young age (n = 8, 11%). An amyloid-β PET scan was rarely (n = 5, 7%) requested in patients with a CSF Aβ+/tau+ status. Fifteen (47%) patients with a post-PET diagnosis of AD had a predominantly non-amnestic presentation. In n = 11 (15%) cases, the reason that the clinician requested amyloid-β was not covered by AUC. This happened most often (n = 7) when previous CSF analysis did not support current clinical diagnosis, which led to requesting amyloid-β PET. CONCLUSION In this single-center study, the main reason for requesting an amyloid-β PET scan after performing CSF biomarkers was the occurrence of a mismatch between the primary clinical diagnosis and CSF Aβ/tau results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhan Reimand
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.,Radiology Centre, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Colin Groot
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre for Medical Image Computing, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, United Kingdom
| | - Sergei Nazarenko
- Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reimand J, Boon BDC, Collij LE, Teunissen CE, Rozemuller AJM, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, Ossenkoppele R, Bouwman F. Amyloid-β PET and CSF in an autopsy-confirmed cohort. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:2150-2160. [PMID: 33080124 PMCID: PMC7664271 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Accumulation of amyloid-β is among the earliest changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) both assess amyloid-β pathology in-vivo, but 10-20% of cases show discordant (CSF+/PET- or CSF-/PET+) results. The neuropathological correspondence with amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance is unknown. METHODS We included 21 patients from our tertiary memory clinic who had undergone both CSF Aβ42 analysis and amyloid-β PET, and had neuropathological data available. Amyloid-β PET and CSF results were compared with neuropathological ABC scores (comprising of Thal (A), Braak (B), and CERAD (C) stage, all ranging from 0 [low] to 3 [high]) and neuropathological diagnosis. RESULTS Neuropathological diagnosis was AD in 11 (52%) patients. Amyloid-β PET was positive in all A3, C2, and C3 cases and in one of the two A2 cases. CSF Aβ42 was positive in 92% of ≥A2 and 90% of ≥C2 cases. PET and CSF were discordant in three of 21 (14%) cases: CSF+/PET- in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (A0B0C0), CSF+/PET- in a patient with FTLD-TDP type B (A2B1C1), and CSF-/PET+ in a patient with AD (A3B3C3). Two CSF+/PET+ cases had a non-AD neuropathological diagnosis, that is FTLD-TDP type E (A3B1C1) and adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids (A1B1C0). INTERPRETATION Our study demonstrates neuropathological underpinnings of amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance. Furthermore, amyloid-β biomarker positivity on both PET and CSF did not invariably result in an AD diagnosis at autopsy, illustrating the importance of considering relevant comorbidities when evaluating amyloid-β biomarker results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhan Reimand
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Health TechnologiesTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
- Radiology CentreNorth Estonia Medical CentreTallinnEstonia
| | - Baayla D. C. Boon
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E. Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Clinical ChemistryAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Annemieke J. M. Rozemuller
- Department of PathologyAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research UnitLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Heeman F, Hendriks J, Lopes Alves I, Ossenkoppele R, Tolboom N, van Berckel BNM, Lammertsma AA, Yaqub M. [ 11C]PIB amyloid quantification: effect of reference region selection. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:123. [PMID: 33074395 PMCID: PMC7572969 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00714-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The standard reference region (RR) for amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET studies is the cerebellar grey matter (GMCB), while alternative RRs have mostly been utilized without prior validation against the gold standard. This study compared five commonly used RRs to gold standard plasma input-based quantification using the GMCB. Methods Thirteen subjects from a test–retest (TRT) study and 30 from a longitudinal study were retrospectively included (total: 17 Alzheimer’s disease, 13 mild cognitive impairment, 13 controls). Dynamic [11C]PiB PET (90 min) and T1-weighted MR scans were co-registered and time–activity curves were extracted for cortical target regions and the following RRs: GMCB, whole cerebellum (WCB), white matter brainstem/pons (WMBS), whole brainstem (WBS) and eroded subcortical white matter (WMES). A two-tissue reversible plasma input model (2T4k_Vb) with GMCB as RR, reference Logan and the simplified reference tissue model were used to derive distribution volume ratios (DVRs), and standardized uptake value (SUV) ratios were calculated for 40–60 min and 60–90 min intervals. Parameter variability was evaluated using TRT scans, and correlations and agreements with the gold standard (DVR from 2T4k_Vb with GMCB RR) were also assessed. Next, longitudinal changes in SUVs (both intervals) were assessed for each RR. Finally, the ability to discriminate between visually Aβ positive and Aβ negative scans was assessed. Results All RRs yielded stable TRT performance (max 5.1% variability), with WCB consistently showing lower variability. All approaches were able to discriminate between Aβ positive and Aβ negative scans, with highest effect sizes obtained for GMCB (range − 0.9 to − 0.7), followed by WCB (range − 0.8 to − 0.6). Furthermore, all approaches provided good correlations with the gold standard (r ≥ 0.78), while the highest bias (as assessed by the regression slope) was observed using WMES (range slope 0.52–0.67), followed by WBS (range slope 0.58–0.92) and WMBS (range slope 0.62–0.91). Finally, RR SUVs were stable across a period of 2.6 years for all except WBS and WMBS RRs (60–90 min interval). Conclusions GMCB and WCB are considered the best RRs for quantifying amyloid burden using [11C]PiB PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Janine Hendriks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Neurology and Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Verberk IMW, Thijssen E, Koelewijn J, Mauroo K, Vanbrabant J, de Wilde A, Zwan MD, Verfaillie SCJ, Ossenkoppele R, Barkhof F, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Stoops E, Vanderstichele HM, Teunissen CE. Combination of plasma amyloid beta (1-42/1-40) and glial fibrillary acidic protein strongly associates with cerebral amyloid pathology. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020; 12:118. [PMID: 32988409 PMCID: PMC7523295 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-020-00682-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) might facilitate identification of participants for clinical trials targeting amyloid beta (Abeta) accumulation, and aid in AD diagnostics. We examined the potential of plasma markers Abeta(1-42/1-40), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL) to identify cerebral amyloidosis and/or disease severity. METHODS We included individuals with a positive (n = 176: 63 ± 7 years, 87 (49%) females) or negative (n = 76: 61 ± 9 years, 27 (36%) females) amyloid PET status, with syndrome diagnosis subjective cognitive decline (18 PET+, 25 PET-), mild cognitive impairment (26 PET+, 24 PET-), or AD-dementia (132 PET+). Plasma Abeta(1-42/1-40), GFAP, and NfL were measured by Simoa. We applied two-way ANOVA adjusted for age and sex to investigate the associations of the plasma markers with amyloid PET status and syndrome diagnosis; logistic regression analysis with Wald's backward selection to identify an optimal panel that identifies amyloid PET positivity; age, sex, and education-adjusted linear regression analysis to investigate associations between the plasma markers and neuropsychological test performance; and Spearman's correlation analysis to investigate associations between the plasma markers and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA). RESULTS Abeta(1-42/1-40) and GFAP independently associated with amyloid PET status (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001 respectively), and GFAP and NfL independently associated with syndrome diagnosis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.048 respectively). The optimal panel identifying a positive amyloid status included Abeta(1-42/1-40) and GFAP, alongside age and APOE (AUC = 88% (95% CI 83-93%), 82% sensitivity, 86% specificity), while excluding NfL and sex. GFAP and NfL robustly associated with cognitive performance on global cognition and all major cognitive domains (GFAP: range standardized β (sβ) = - 0.40 to - 0.26; NfL: range sβ = - 0.35 to - 0.18; all: p < 0.002), whereas Abeta(1-42/1-40) associated with global cognition, memory, attention, and executive functioning (range sβ = 0.22 - 0.11; all: p < 0.05) but not language. GFAP and NfL showed moderate positive correlations with MTA (both: Spearman's rho> 0.33, p < 0.001). Abeta(1-42/1-40) showed a moderate negative correlation with MTA (Spearman's rho = - 0.24, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Combination of plasma Abeta(1-42/1-40) and GFAP provides a valuable tool for the identification of amyloid PET status. Furthermore, plasma GFAP and NfL associate with various disease severity measures suggesting potential for disease monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge M W Verberk
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Elisabeth Thijssen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jannet Koelewijn
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Arno de Wilde
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa D Zwan
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Legdeur N, Badissi M, Yaqub M, Beker N, Sudre CH, Ten Kate M, Gordon MF, Novak G, Barkhof F, van Berckel BNM, Holstege H, Muller M, Scheltens P, Maier AB, Visser PJ. What determines cognitive functioning in the oldest-old? The EMIF-AD 90+ Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2020; 76:1499-1511. [PMID: 32898275 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Determinants of cognitive functioning in individuals aged 90 years and older, the oldest-old, remain poorly understood. We aimed to establish the association of risk factors, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), hippocampal atrophy and amyloid aggregation with cognition in the oldest-old. METHODS We included 84 individuals without cognitive impairment and 38 individuals with cognitive impairment from the EMIF-AD 90+ Study (mean age 92.4 years) and tested cross-sectional associations between risk factors (cognitive activity, physical parameters, nutritional status, inflammatory markers and cardiovascular risk factors), brain pathology biomarkers (WMH and hippocampal volume on MRI, and amyloid binding measured with PET) and cognition. Additionally, we tested whether the brain pathology biomarkers were independently associated with cognition. When applicable, we tested whether the effect of risk factors on cognition was mediated by brain pathology. RESULTS Lower values for handgrip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), nutritional status, HbA1c and hippocampal volume, and higher values for WMH volume and amyloid binding were associated with worse cognition. Higher past cognitive activity and lower BMI were associated with increased amyloid binding, lower muscle mass with more WMH, and lower SPPB scores with more WMH and hippocampal atrophy. The brain pathology markers were independently associated with cognition. The association of SPPB with cognition was partially mediated by hippocampal volume. DISCUSSION In the oldest-old, physical parameters, nutritional status, HbA1c, WMH, hippocampal atrophy and amyloid binding are associated with cognitive impairment. Physical performance may affect cognition through hippocampal atrophy. This study highlights the importance to consider multiple factors when assessing cognition in the oldest-old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke Legdeur
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maryam Badissi
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Beker
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carole H Sudre
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mara Ten Kate
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gerald Novak
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henne Holstege
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Majon Muller
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea B Maier
- Department of Medicine and Aged Care, @AgeMelbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Human Movement Sciences, @AgeAmsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research Institute Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|