Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Ten new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients without driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

A Phase II Trial of Pevonedistat and Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Postimmunotherapy (IO) treatment options for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited. Docetaxel alone or in combination with ramucirumab remains a standard of care, but response rates and survival benefit are suboptimal. Cullin-RING ligases (CRL) catalyze degradation of tumor suppressor proteins and are overactivated in NSCLC. Neddylation, which is catalyzed by the NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE), is required for the activation of CRLs. Pevonedistat, a first-in-class small molecule NAE inhibitor, exerted antitumor activity when combined with docetaxel in preclinical studies.

METHODS

We conducted a phase II, single-arm, investigator-initiated study evaluating the efficacy of pevonedistat plus docetaxel in patients with relapsed/refractory stage IV NSCLC. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and pevonedistat 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

From March 5, 2018 to January 26, 2021, we enrolled 31 patients. The ORR was 22% (1 CR, 5 PR), median PFS was 4.1 months, and median OS was 13.2 months. The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) was 53% in patients (n = 30) who received at least 1 dose of both drugs, with the most frequent being neutropenia and AST/ALT elevation. One patient was taken off study for a Grade 4 transaminase elevation. There were no Grade 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the combination of docetaxel and pevonedistat is safe and exerts activity in patients with relapsed NSCLC. These encouraging results suggest that the neddylation pathway is an antitumor pathway that should be further studied.

Pneumatosis intestinalis in cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy may give rise to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI), or gas within the bowel wall, has very rarely been observed following ICI therapy, and its clinical significance is unclear. We described the clinical characteristics and outcomes of PI as a possible irAE in cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 12 adult cancer patients with radiologic evidence of PI within 1 year after ICI exposure during January 2010-January 2023. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age of our sample was 64 years. The most common cancer types were thoracic/head & neck and gastrointestinal. Eleven patients (92%) received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy, while 1 patient (8%) received a combination of anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4. PI occurred a median of 7 months after the first ICI dose. Half the patients (50%) were asymptomatic on diagnosis, and the most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (42%). Six patients experienced complications, namely pneumoperitoneum (n = 6, 50%) and microperforation (n = 1, 8%), identified on imaging. Nine patients were treated with antibiotics and 3 patients were monitored conservatively. Nine patients (75%) resumed cancer treatment after PI.

CONCLUSION

PI may develop as an irAE. While half of cases were incidental radiologic findings, management with antibiotics as well as hospitalization for observation may still be appropriate. The decision to restart cancer therapy and possibly resume ICI therapy remains to be elucidated. Further large-scale studies may be warranted to clarify the association between PI and ICI therapy.

Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO/ESTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This joint guideline by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) was initiated to review evidence and provide recommendations regarding the use of local therapy in the management of extracranial oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Local therapy is defined as the comprehensive treatment of all known cancer-primary tumor, regional nodal metastases, and metastases-with definitive intent.

METHODS

ASTRO and ESTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of local (radiation, surgery, other ablative methods) and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic NSCLC. The questions address clinical scenarios for using local therapy, sequencing and timing when integrating local with systemic therapies, radiation techniques critical for oligometastatic disease targeting and treatment delivery, and the role of local therapy for oligoprogression or recurrent disease. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using ASTRO guidelines methodology.

RESULTS

Based on the lack of significant randomized phase 3 trials, a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach was strongly recommended for all decision-making regarding potential treatment. Integration of definitive local therapy was only relevant if technically feasible and clinically safe to all disease sites, defined as 5 or fewer distinct sites. Conditional recommendations were given for definitive local therapies in synchronous, metachronous, oligopersistent, and oligoprogressive conditions for extracranial disease. Radiation and surgery were the only primary definitive local therapy modalities recommended for use in the management of patients with oligometastatic disease, with indications provided for choosing one over the other. Sequencing recommendations were provided for systemic and local therapy integration. Finally, multiple recommendations were provided for the optimal technical use of hypofractionated radiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy as definitive local therapy, including dose and fractionation.

CONCLUSIONS

Presently, data regarding clinical benefits of local therapy on overall and other survival outcomes is still sparse for oligometastatic NSCLC. However, with rapidly evolving data being generated supporting local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC, this guideline attempted to frame recommendations as a function of the quality of data available to make decisions in a multidisciplinary approach incorporating patient goals and tolerances.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.2

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis; as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2). Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.

Confirmatory DPYD Testing in Patients Receiving Fluoropyrimidines who are Suspected DPYD Variant Carriers Based on a Genetic Data Repository

Using pharmacogenetics (PGx) to inform clinical decision making can benefit patients but clinical use of PGx testing has been limited. Existing genetics data obtained in the course of research could be used to identify patients who are suspected, but have not yet been confirmed, to carry clinically actionable genotypes, in whom confirmatory genetic testing could be conducted for highly efficient PGx implementation. Herein we demonstrate that it is regulatorily and technically feasible to implement PGx by identifying suspected carriers of actionable genotypes within an institutional genetics data repository and conduct confirmatory PGx testing immediately prior to that patient receiving the PGx-relevant drug, using a case study of DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. In two years since launching this program, ~3,000 suspected DPYD carriers have been passively monitored and one confirmed DPYD carrier was prevented from receiving unacceptably toxic fluoropyrimidine treatment, for minimal cost and effort. Now that we have demonstrated the feasibility of this strategy, we plan to transition to PGx panel testing and expand implementation to other genes and drugs for which the evidence of clinical benefit of PGx-informed treatment is high but PGx testing is not generally conducted. This highly efficient implementation process will maximize the clinical benefits of testing and could be explored at other institutions that have research-only genetic data repositories to expand the number of patients who benefit from PGx-informed treatment while we continue to work toward wide-scale adoption of PGx testing and implementation.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2022.2

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See Appendix 1 (online only) for disclaimers and other important information. Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-non-da-living-guideline.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2022.2

Living guidelines are developed for selected topic areas with rapidly evolving evidence that drives frequent change in recommended clinical practice. Living guidelines are updated on a regular schedule by a standing expert panel that systematically reviews the health literature on a continuous basis, as described in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Living Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Living Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See Appendix 1 (online only) for disclaimers and other important information. Updates are published regularly and can be found at https://ascopubs.org/nsclc-da-living-guideline.

Liver injury during durvalumab-based immunotherapy is associated with poorer patient survival: A retrospective analysis

Background

Durvalumab is approved for the treatment of lung cancer, advanced biliary tract cancers, and is also being evaluated in many other solid organ tumors. The aim of our study is to define the incidence, etiology, and outcomes of liver injury in consecutive patients receiving durvalumab-based immunotherapy.

Patients and methods

Durvalumab treated patients between 1/2016 - 7/2020 were identified from the electronic medical record. Liver injury was defined as serum AST or ALT ≥ 5x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP ≥ 2x ULN, bilirubin ≥ 2.5 mg/dl, or INR ≥ 1.5. Potential drug induced liver injury (DILI) cases were adjudicated using expert opinion scoring and confirmed with Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM).

Results

Amongst 112 patients, 58 (52%) had non-small cell lung cancer, the median age was 65 years, and 60% were male. The 21 (19%) liver injury patients were significantly more likely to harbor hepatic metastases (52% vs 17%, p=<0.001), experience tumor progression (67% vs 32%, p=0.01) or die (48% vs 11%, p<0.001) during follow-up compared to the 91 without liver injury. Using multivariate regression analysis, the development of liver injury during treatment as well as baseline hepatic metastases were independently associated with mortality during follow-up. Six of the 21 (29%) liver injury cases were adjudicated as probable DILI with four attributed to durvalumab and two due to other drugs (paclitaxel, pembrolizumab). Durvalumab was permanently discontinued in two DILI patients, three received corticosteroids, and one was successfully rechallenged. Only one patient with DILI developed jaundice, and none required hospitalization. Liver biochemistries normalized in all 6 DILI cases, while they only normalized in 27% of the 15 non-DILI cases (p=0.002). The 6 DILI patients also had a trend towards improved survival compared to those with other causes of liver injury.

Conclusion

Liver injury was observed in 19% of durvalumab-treated patients and is associated with a greater likelihood of tumor progression and death during follow-up. The four durvalumab DILI cases were mild and self-limited, highlighting the importance of causality assessment to determine the cause of liver injury in oncology patients receiving immunotherapy.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2021 ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver alterations.

METHODS

ASCO updated recommendations on the basis of an ongoing systematic review of randomized control trials from 2020 to 2021.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Two studies provide the evidence base. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety.

RECOMMENDATIONS

For patients with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement, a performance status (PS) of 0-2, and previously untreated NSCLC, clinicians should offer alectinib or brigatinib or lorlatinib. For patients with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement, a PS of 0-2, and previously untreated NSCLC, if alectinib, brigatinib, or lorlatinib are not available, clinicians should offer ceritinib or crizotinib. For patients with a RET rearrangement, a PS of 0-2, and previously untreated NSCLC, clinicians may offer selpercatinib or pralsetinib. In second line, for patients with a RET rearrangement who have not received RET-targeted therapy, clinicians may offer selpercatinib or pralsetinib.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2020 ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer without driver alterations.

METHODS

ASCO updated recommendations on the basis of an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials from 2018 to 2021.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Five randomized clinical trials provide the evidence base. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety.

RECOMMENDATIONS

In addition to 2020 options for patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%), nonsquamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC), and performance status (PS) 0-1, clinicians may offer single-agent atezolizumab. With high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%), non-SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilumumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy. With negative (0%) and low positive PD-L1 expression (TPS 1%-49%), non-SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy. With high PD-L1 expression, SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer single-agent atezolizumab. With high PD-L1 expression, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or in combination with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. With negative and low positive PD-L1 expression, SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or in combination with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. With non-SCC who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy as first-line therapy, clinicians may offer second-line paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. With non-SCC, who received chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, clinicians should offer the options of third-line single-agent pemetrexed, docetaxel, or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Cellular engagement and interaction in the tumor microenvironment predict non-response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents have improved the survival of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Tumor PD-L1 expression is an imperfect biomarker as it does not capture the complex interactions between constituents of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Using multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC), we modeled the TME to study the influence of cellular distribution and engagement on response to ICI in mNSCLC. We performed mfIHC on pretreatment tissue from patients with mNSCLC who received ICI. We used primary antibodies against CD3, CD8, CD163, PD-L1, pancytokeratin, and FOXP3; simple and complex phenotyping as well as spatial analyses was performed. We analyzed 68 distinct samples from 52 patients with mNSCLC. Patients were 39–79 years old (median 67); 44% were male and 75% had adenocarcinoma histology. The most used ICI was atezolizumab (48%). The percentage of PD-L1 positive epithelial tumor cells (EC), degree of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) engagement with EC, and degree of CTL engagement with helper T lymphocytes (HTL) were significantly lower in non-responders versus responders (p = 0.0163, p = 0.0026 and p = 0.0006, respectively). The combination of these 3 characteristics generated the best sensitivity and specificity to predict non-response to ICI and was also associated with shortened overall survival (p = 0.0271). The combination of low CTL engagement with EC and HTL along with low expression of EC PD-L1 represents a state of impaired endogenous immune reactivity. Together, they more precisely identified non-responders to ICI compared to PD-L1 alone and illustrate the importance of cellular interactions in the TME.

ASO Perspectives: Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Never Stop Questioning

This ASO perspective reviews the findings of a randomized placebo-controlled, clinical trial evaluating adjuvant nivolumab in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma, reported recently by the Checkmate 577 investigators. The use of postoperative immunotherapy represents a significant paradigm shift for managing patients who have had limited evidence-based treatment options after completing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection for these aggressive malignancies.

The Role of Tissue Biopsy in the Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and are now omnipresent. However, immune-related adverse events can present with varying phenotypes and timing, which can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the treating oncologist as well as subspecialty consultants. Biopsies of affected organs may provide insight into biologic mechanisms as well as potentially guide management in certain circumstances.

Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The aim of the NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities is to provide guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events resulting from cancer immunotherapy. The NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions, consisting of medical and hematologic oncologists with expertise across a wide range of disease sites, and experts from the areas of dermatology, gastroenterology, endocrinology, neurooncology, nephrology, cardio-oncology, ophthalmology, pulmonary medicine, and oncology nursing. The content featured in this issue is an excerpt of the recommendations for managing toxicities related to CAR T-cell therapies and a review of existing evidence. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines, including recommendations for managing toxicities related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, visit NCCN.org.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialists, and advocacy experts was convened to update the guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on evidence published from 2017 through 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 175 studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review and were pertinent to the development of the recommendations. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, recommendations are based on expert consensus.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to the organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, except for some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert ≤ grade 1. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids. Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4-6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, except for endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialists, and advocacy experts was convened to develop the guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on evidence published from 2017 to 2021.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 35 eligible publications. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, recommendations are based on expert consensus.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The multidisciplinary team issued recommendations to aid in the recognition, workup, evaluation, and management of the most common CAR T-cell-related toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, B-cell aplasia, cytopenias, and infections. Management of short-term toxicities associated with CAR T cells begins with supportive care for most patients, but may require pharmacologic interventions for those without adequate response. Management of patients with prolonged or severe CAR T-cell-associated cytokine release syndrome includes treatment with tocilizumab with or without a corticosteroid. On the basis of the potential for rapid decline, patients with moderate to severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome should be managed with corticosteroids and supportive care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2020

The NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities provide interdisciplinary guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) resulting from cancer immunotherapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights describe symptoms that may be caused by an irAE and should trigger further investigation, and summarize the NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel discussions for the 2020 update to the guidelines regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diarrhea/colitis and cardiovascular irAEs.

Multicenter, randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)

4005

Background: Recent transformative studies in the treatment of EAC support adjuvant nivolumab for patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (Checkmate 577) and pembrolizumab (P) with chemotherapy in untreated metastatic disease (Keynote 590). We hypothesized that pre-operative P combined with CRT can further improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced EAC. Methods: Patients with cT3-4Nx or T2N1 M0 EAC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma eligible for curative surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive either full-dose paclitaxel (T)/ carboplatin (C) or T/C + P induction therapy. All patients then received CRT with weekly T/C, RT 41.4Gy in 23 fractions, and P every 3 weeks. Following resection, patients received P for one year. The primary endpoint is rate of major pathologic response (MPR), defined as pathologic complete response or near complete response ( < 10% residual cancer), with 80% power and 0.1 one-sided significance level to detect the difference between a MPR proportion of 30% (historical control) and an alternative hypothesis of 47% (with preoperative P). Tissue was collected for tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) analysis including bulk and single cell RNA(scRNA) expression analysis, DNA sequencing, and flow cytometry. Results: From 8/4/17 to 10/26/20, 40 patients were enrolled: median age 68 [38-81], male 32, esophagus/GEJ type I (n = 16), GEJ II/III (n = 24). CRT was well tolerated, with no grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to P. Notable toxicity included grade 3-4 pneumonitis (13%), anastomotic leak (13%), infection (35%). In 31 evaluable patients to date, the MPR rate was 50.0% (95% CI, 32.7%-67.3%). 1-yr disease free survival was 100% for patients with MPR vs. 31.8% without MPR, p = 0.002. Esophageal/GEJ type I cancers had a significantly higher MPR rate when compared with GEJ type II/III (76.9% vs 37.5%, p = 0.03). scRNA seq on > 100,000 tumor cells revealed EAC/GEJ type I had higher infiltration of activated dendritic cells (p = 0.12), whereas GEJ tumors have significantly higher infiltration of activated B cells (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The addition of P to preoperative CRT for EAC is safe and associated with a significantly higher MPR rate compared to historical data. We found MPR to be significantly enriched in EAC/GEJ type I tumors compared with GEJ II/III, associated with important differences in the baseline tumor immune microenvironment. Clinical trial information: NCT02998268.

Bone Metastases, Skeletal-Related Events, and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) are a frequent cause of morbidity in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Data are limited on bone metastases and SREs in patients with mNSCLC treated using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and on the efficacy of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in this setting. Here we report the incidence, impact on survival, risk factors for bone metastases and SREs, and impact of BMAs in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs in a multi-institutional cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs at 2 tertiary care centers from 2014 through 2017. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with and without baseline bone metastases using a log-rank test. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association between OS and the presence of bone metastases at ICI initiation, controlling for other confounding factors.

RESULTS

We identified a cohort of 330 patients who had received ICIs for metastatic disease. Median patient age was 63 years, most patients were treated in the second line or beyond (n=259; 78%), and nivolumab was the most common ICI (n=211; 64%). Median OS was 10 months (95% CI, 8.4-12.0). In our cohort, 124 patients (38%) had baseline bone metastases, and 43 (13%) developed SREs during or after ICI treatment. Patients with bone metastases had a higher hazard of death after controlling for performance status, histology, line of therapy, and disease burden (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.19-2.08; P=.001). Use of BMAs was not associated with OS or a decreased risk of SREs.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of bone metastases at baseline was associated with a worse prognosis for patients with mNSCLC treated with ICI after controlling for multiple clinical characteristics. Use of BMAs was not associated with reduced SREs or a difference in survival.

Radiation Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Endorsement of an ASTRO Guideline

PURPOSE

The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) produced an evidence-based guideline on radiation therapy (RT) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Because of the relevance of this topic to ASCO membership, ASCO reviewed the guideline, applying a set of procedures and policies used to critically examine guidelines developed by other organizations.

METHODS

The ASTRO guideline on RT for SCLC was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. Then, an ASCO Expert Panel reviewed the content and the recommendations.

RESULTS

The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the recommendations from ASTRO guideline on RT for SCLC, published in June 2020, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorsed ASTRO guideline on RT for SCLC with a few discussion points.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations addressed thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage SCLC, role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in stage I or II node-negative SCLC, prophylactic cranial radiotherapy, and thoracic consolidation for extensive-stage SCLC. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines .

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2017 ASCO guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver alterations. A guideline update for systemic therapy for patients with stage IV NSCLC without driver alterations was published separately.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) NSCLC Expert Panel updated recommendations based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from December 2015 to January 2020 and meeting abstracts from ASCO 2020.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Twenty-seven RCTs, 26 observational studies, and one meta-analysis provide the evidence base (total 54). Outcomes of interest included efficacy and safety. Additional literature suggested by the Expert Panel is discussed.

RECOMMENDATIONS

All patients with nonsquamous NSCLC should have the results of testing for potentially targetable mutations (alterations) before implementing therapy for advanced lung cancer, regardless of smoking status recommendations, when possible, following other existing high-quality testing guidelines. Most patients should receive targeted therapy for these alterations: Targeted therapies against ROS-1 fusions, BRAF V600e mutations, RET fusions, MET exon 14 skipping mutations, and NTRK fusions should be offered to patients, either as initial or second-line therapy when not given in the first-line setting. New or revised recommendations include the following: Osimertinib is the optimal first-line treatment for patients with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (exon 19 deletion, exon 21 L858R, and exon 20 T790M); alectinib or brigatinib is the optimal first-line treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusions. For the first time, to our knowledge, the guideline includes recommendations regarding RET, MET, and NTRK alterations. Chemotherapy is still an option at most stages.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Abstract B45: High-throughput label-free isolation and expansion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for personalized treatments

Background: Circulating tumor cell (CTC) clusters are emerging as clinically significant harbingers of metastases in solid organ cancers. Prior to engaging these CTC clusters in animal models of metastases, it is imperative for technology to identify them with high sensitivity. These clusters often present heterogeneous surface markers, and current methods for isolation of clusters may fall short.

Methods: We have applied the inertial microfluidic Labyrinth device for high-throughput, biomarker-independent, size-based isolation of CTCs and CTC clusters from patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Results: Using the Labyrinth device, CTCs (PanCK+/DAPI+/CD45-) were isolated from metastatic NSCLC patients (n=25). Heterogeneous CTC populations were detected, including CTCs expressing epithelial (EpCAM), mesenchymal (vimentin), or both markers. CTCs were isolated from 100% of patients (417±1023 CTCs/mL), and CTCs that were EpCAM negative were significantly higher in numbers than EpCAM+ CTCs. Cell clusters of ≥2 CTCs were observed in 96% of patients, of which 75% were negative for EpCAM. Patients with higher number of CTC clusters than single CTCs had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.05). Recovered CTCs from patients with RET, ROS1, and ALK-rearranged tumors revealed identical genetic aberrations as the primary tumor for each gene using FISH analysis. We have successfully expanded the recovered CTCs from 2 patients and screened for therapeutic targeting. We have found that TPX-0005 might be effective in these patients and would direct them to a clinical trial using this compound.

Conclusions: The label-free Labyrinth device demonstrated the capability of collecting recovered CTCs from the device using a continuous processing technique while in a suspension state. This advantage opens the opportunities not only for CTC expansion off-chip, but also for ex vivo drug testing to direct patient-specific therapies.

Citation Format: Mina Zeinali, Wei Huang, Maggie Lee, Arthi Nadhan, Anvya Mathur, Casey Hedman, Eric Lin, Ramdane Harouaka, Max S. Wicha, Lili Zhao, Nallasivam Palanisamy, Mathias Hafner, Rishindra Reddy, Gregory P. Kalemkerian, Bryan J. Schneider, Khaled A. Hassan, Nithya Ramnath, Sunitha Nagrath. High-throughput label-free isolation and expansion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for personalized treatments [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr B45.

Durvalumab following multimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma: Updated survival and early translational results from Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium Study

4572

Background: Concurrent chemoradiation(CRT) followed by esophagectomy is a standard of care for locally advanced esophageal(LA-EAC) and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Approximately 50% of patients(pts) experience disease relapse within the 1st yr after treatment(tx) completion. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity in metastatic PD-L1 positive EAC. Preclinical studies have shown radiation +/- chemotherapy upregulates PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab(durva) in pts with LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma who had residual disease in surgical specimen after neoadjuvant CRT and R0 resection. Pts received durva 1500mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1yr. Results: Initially 24 pts were enrolled, study was expanded to enroll additional 13 pts. Median age: 61yrs (range, 43-73). 31 received carbo/paclitaxel and 6 received cis/5-FU concurrently with RT. 24(64.9%) pts had positive lymph nodes(LN) at the time of surgery following CRT: N3(n = 3,8.1%), N2(n = 10, 27%), N1(n = 11,29.7%).17 pts relapsed: 11 on tx, 6 had late relapses. 3/5 late relapses were locoregional and were re-treated with chemo-RT. Remaining relapses were systemic with lung and LN being the most common sites. 2 of 3 pts who developed grade 3 irAEs are alive and disease free at 17 and 23 mo. RFS/OS:1 yr- 79.2%/95.5%, 2yr-55.5%/67.4%. 20/37 pts have HER-2 status available: 5/6 HER2 positive pts had disease relapse, 1 is undergoing tx. Molecular profiling is available on 8 relapsed pts: all were microsatellite stable with low TMB and PD-L1 < 10% CPS. Mutations in DNA repair genes ( ARID1A, ATM, ATR, CHEK2), and PIK3CA E542K were more prevalent among late relapsing pts. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) analysis is available for 10/37 pts. 4/5 pts where CTCs increased from C1 to C4 had disease relapse. Molecular profiling of the remaining pts and correlation of PD-L1 expression, TMB, specific genes mutations, CTCs, and Immunoscore with outcomes with durva is being evaluated will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Adjuvant durva following trimodality therapy for LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma improved 1-yr RFS to 79.2% compared to historical rate of 50%.2-yr RFS and OS data are encouraging in this high risk pt population. HER-2 positivity may be associated with lack of benefit from durva. Mutations in DNA repair genes are prevalent in pts with delayed relapse. Rise in CTCs during durva tx may be an early marker of disease relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT02639065 .

Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

Several sentinel phase III randomized trials have recently been published challenging traditional radiation therapy (RT) practices for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline reviews the evidence for thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for both limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on indications, dose fractionation, techniques and timing of thoracic RT for LS-SCLC, the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional RT in stage I or II node negative SCLC, PCI for LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, and thoracic consolidation for ES-SCLC. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

The task force strongly recommends definitive thoracic RT administered once or twice daily early in the course of treatment for LS-SCLC. Adjuvant RT is conditionally recommended in surgically resected patients with positive margins or nodal metastases. Involved field RT delivered using conformal advanced treatment modalities to postchemotherapy volumes is also strongly recommended. For patients with stage I or II node negative disease, SBRT or conventional fractionation is strongly recommended, and chemotherapy should be delivered before or after SBRT. In LS-SCLC, PCI is strongly recommended for stage II or III patients who responded to chemoradiation, conditionally not recommended for stage I patients, and should be a shared decision for patients at higher risk of neurocognitive toxicities. In ES-SCLC, radiation oncologist consultation for consideration of PCI versus magnetic resonance surveillance is strongly recommended. Lastly, the use of thoracic RT is strongly recommended in select patients with ES-SCLC after chemotherapy treatment, including a conditional recommendation in those responding to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

RT plays a vital role in both LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC. These guidelines inform best clinical practices for local therapy in SCLC.

ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsements and Adaptations

ASCO engages in the endorsement and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines to recognize the high-quality work of other guideline-developing organizations, to avoid duplication of effort, and to offer harmonized recommendations across guideline development groups. ASCO develops guidelines in accordance with the principles of the National Academy of Medicine and Council of Medical Specialty Societies. Guidelines developed in a similar manner by other organizations make endorsement by ASCO more likely. If allowed by the partnering organization, ASCO may consider an adaptation of a guideline, building on the original guideline with further inquiry or modifications. Organizations seeking ASCO endorsement consideration are provided with ASCO’s endorsement and adaptation procedures at the time of endorsement submission They can request either Endorsement or Endorsement or Adaptation. ASCO endorsement entails a formal review by an independent ASCO Expert Panel, and, if modifications to the recommendations are made, depending upon the original endorsement request, guidelines will be adapted or discontinued, rather than endorsed. The process begins with approval from ASCO’s Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CPGC) leadership to proceed with endorsement development. An ASCO Expert Panel of approximately 10 multidisciplinary content experts, patient representatives, community oncologists, and relevant health providers is formed to develop an ASCO endorsement. ASCO’s Conflict of Interest Policy Implementation for Clinical Practice Guidelines and procedures apply to all ASCO expert panels. The CPGC reviews and approves all ASCO guideline products on behalf of ASCO. The endorsement process described in this report is designed to preserve a high-quality and resource-efficient approach for potential ASCO endorsement or adaptation of guidelines developed by other health professional organizations, while maintaining the objectivity, quality, and high standards reflective of ASCO’s guiding principles.

Safety and efficacy of durvalumab following multimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma: Two-year follow-up results from Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium study

404

Background: Concurrent chemoradiation(CRT) followed by esophagectomy is a standard of care for locally advanced esophageal(LA-EAC) and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Approximately 50% of patients(pts) experience disease relapse within the 1st yr after treatment(tx) completion. No adjuvant tx has been shown to improve survival in these pts. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity in metastatic PD-L1 positive EAC. Preclinical studies have shown radiation +/- chemotherapy upregulate PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of durvalumab(durva) in pts with LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma who have residual disease in surgical specimen after neoadjuvant CRT and R0 resection. Pts received durva 1500mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1yr. Results: 24 pts were enrolled from 4/2016-1/2018(median age: 60yrs (range, 43-70). 18 received carbo/paclitaxel and 6 received cis/5-FU concurrently with radiation. Staging at diagnosis: T2N0(n = 3, 12.5%), T2N2(n = 3, 12.5%),T3N0(n = 6, 25%), T3N1(n = 6, 25%), T3N2(n = 4, 17%), T3N3(n = 1, 4%), T3Nx(n = 1, 4%).19 pts(79%) had positive lymph nodes(LNs) at the time of surgery following CRT. 12 pts completed 1yr of tx, 12 came off tx because of relapse(6), AEs(5), and consent withdrawal(1). Most common AEs were fatigue(n = 8, 33.3%) and nausea(n = 6, 25%). 3pts (12.5%) developed grade 3 irAEs: pneumonitis(1), hepatitis(1), colitis(1). At median follow up of 21.9mo(range, 1.7-23.9mo), 11 pts have relapsed: 9 distant and 2 locoregional. Two of 3 pts with grade 3 irAEs are alive and disease free at 17 and 23 mo respectively. 1-yr RFS and OS were 79.2% and 95.5%, respectively. RFS at 26 mo was 20.6%. Overall mOS and mOS after relapse were 28.1mo(range, 22.9-28.1) and 11.1 mo(range, 0.1-11.3mo) respectively. The study was expanded to enroll 14 additional pts who are currently undergoing tx. Conclusions: Adjuvant durvalumab following trimodality therapy for LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma is safe with improvement in 1-yr RFS to 79.2% compared to historical rate of 50%. RFS was 20.6% at 26 months. Evaluation of predictive biomarkers of RFS with durva is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02639065.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2017 ASCO guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations. A guideline update for patients with stage IV NSCLC with driver alterations will be published separately.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) NSCLC Expert Panel made updated recommendations based on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from December 2015 to 2019.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous guideline update. Five randomized controlled trials provide the evidence base. Additional literature suggested by the Expert Panel is discussed.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations apply to patients without driver alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor or ALK. For patients with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%) and non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC), the Expert Panel recommends single-agent pembrolizumab. Additional treatment options include pembrolizumab/carboplatin/pemetrexed, atezolizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, or atezolizumab/carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel. For most patients with non-SCC and either negative (0%) or low positive (1% to 49%) PD-L1, the Expert Panel recommends pembrolizumab/carboplatin/pemetrexed. Additional options are atezolizumab/carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel, atezolizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, platinum-based two-drug combination chemotherapy, or non-platinum-based two-drug therapy. Single-agent pembrolizumab is an option for low positive PD-L1. For patients with high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%) and SCC, the Expert Panel recommends single-agent pembrolizumab. An additional treatment option is pembrolizumab/carboplatin/(paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel). For most patients with SCC and either negative (0%) or low positive PD-L1 (TPS 1% to 49%), the Expert Panel recommends pembrolizumab/carboplatin/(paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel) or chemotherapy. Single-agent pembrolizumab is an option in select cases of low positive PD-L1. Recommendations are conditional on the basis of histology, PD-L1 status, and/or the presence or absence of contraindications. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/lung-cancer-guidelines.

A phase 1 study of nevanimibe HCl, a novel adrenal-specific sterol O-acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) inhibitor, in adrenocortical carcinoma

Background Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with very limited treatment options. Nevanimibe HCl (formerly ATR-101), a novel adrenal-specific sterol O-acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) inhibitor, has been shown in nonclinical studies to decrease adrenal steroidogenesis at lower doses and to cause apoptosis of adrenocortical cells at higher doses. Methods This phase 1, multicenter, open-label study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of nevanimibe in adults with metastatic ACC (NCT01898715). A "3 + 3" dose-escalation design was used. Adverse events (AEs), PK, and tumor response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were evaluated every 2 months. Results 63 patients with metastatic ACC, all of whom had previously failed systemic chemotherapy and only 2 of whom were mitotane-naïve, were dosed with oral nevanimibe at doses ranging from 1.6 mg/kg/day to 158.5 mg/kg/day. Subjects who did not experience tumor progression or a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) could continue to receive additional cycles. No patients experienced a complete or partial response; however, 13 of the 48 (27%) patients who underwent imaging at 2 months had stable disease (SD), and 4 of these had SD > 4 months. In addition, drug-related adrenal insufficiency, considered a pharmacologic effect of nevanimibe, was observed in two patients. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were gastrointestinal disorders (76%), including diarrhea (44%) and vomiting (35%). A maximum tolerated dose (MTD) could not be defined, as very few dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred. Because the large number of tablets required at the highest dose (i.e., ~24 tablets/day) resulted in low-grade gastrointestinal adverse effects, a maximum feasible dose of 128.2 mg/kg/day was established as a dose that could be taken on a long-term basis. Conclusions This study demonstrated the safety of nevanimibe at doses of up to ~6000 mg BID. As the total number of tablets required to achieve an MTD exceeded practical administration limits, a maximum feasible dose was defined. Given that the expected exposure levels necessary for an apoptotic effect could not be achieved, the current formulation of nevanimibe had limited efficacy in patients with advanced ACC.

High-Throughput Label-Free Isolation of Heterogeneous Circulating Tumor Cells and CTC Clusters from Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

(1) Background: Circulating tumor cell (CTC) clusters are emerging as clinically significant harbingers of metastases in solid organ cancers. Prior to engaging these CTC clusters in animal models of metastases, it is imperative for technology to identify them with high sensitivity. These clusters often present heterogeneous surface markers and current methods for isolation of clusters may fall short. (2) Methods: We applied an inertial microfluidic Labyrinth device for high-throughput, biomarker-independent, size-based isolation of CTCs/CTC clusters from patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (3) Results: Using Labyrinth, CTCs (PanCK+/DAPI+/CD45−) were isolated from patients (n = 25). Heterogeneous CTC populations, including CTCs expressing epithelial (EpCAM), mesenchymal (Vimentin) or both markers were detected. CTCs were isolated from 100% of patients (417 ± 1023 CTCs/mL). EpCAM− CTCs were significantly greater than EpCAM+ CTCs. Cell clusters of ≥2 CTCs were observed in 96% of patients—of which, 75% were EpCAM−. CTCs revealed identical genetic aberrations as the primary tumor for RET, ROS1 , and ALK genes using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. (4) Conclusions: The Labyrinth device recovered heterogeneous CTCs in 100% and CTC clusters in 96% of patients with metastatic NSCLC. The majority of recovered CTCs/clusters were EpCAM−, suggesting that these would have been missed using traditional antibody-based capture methods.

Lung Cancer Surveillance After Definitive Curative-Intent Therapy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on radiographic imaging and biomarker surveillance strategies after definitive curative-intent therapy in patients with stage I-III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, radiology, primary care, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2019. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 14 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients should undergo surveillance imaging for recurrence every 6 months for 2 years and then annually for detection of new primary lung cancers. Chest computed tomography imaging is the optimal imaging modality for surveillance. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging should not be used as a surveillance tool. Surveillance imaging may not be offered to patients who are clinically unsuitable for or unwilling to accept further treatment. Age should not preclude surveillance imaging. Circulating biomarkers should not be used as a surveillance strategy for detection of recurrence. Brain magnetic resonance imaging should not be used for routine surveillance in stage I-III NSCLC but may be used every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months for the second year in patients with stage I-III small-cell lung cancer who have undergone curative-intent treatment.

Nivolumab-induced large-duct cholangiopathy treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and tocilizumab

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has become a cornerstone in the management of many oncologic diseases. Although it is well tolerated in most patients, a wide spectrum of adverse events has been described as a result of immune system alteration. We present a case of a woman with metastatic bronchogenic adenocarcinoma who was initially thought to have immune-mediated hepatitis, but eventually discovered to have a rarely described immune-mediated cholangiopathy. Her cholangiopathy appeared to stabilize following ursodeoxycholic acid and tocilizumab after several lines of guideline-directed therapy. Awareness of this unique toxicity following immune checkpoint inhibitor, and potential treatment options may help clinicians manage this rare but serious complication.

A Pilot Study of Atezolizumab Plus Hypofractionated Image Guided Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Preclinical data and subset analyses from immunotherapy clinical trials indicate that prior radiation therapy was associated with better progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We present a prospective study of hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy (HIGRT) to a single site of metastatic disease concurrently with atezolizumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients meeting eligibility criteria received 1200 mg of atezolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks with concurrent 3- or 5-fraction HIGRT starting no later than the second cycle. The 3-fraction regimen employed a minimum of 8 Gy per fraction compared with 6 Gy for the 5-fraction regimen. Imaging was obtained every 12 weeks to assess response.

RESULTS

From October 2015 to February 2017, 12 patients were enrolled in the study (median age 64; range, 55-77 years). The best response by the Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors criteria was partial response in 3 and stable disease in 3, for a disease control rate of 50%. Five patients had a grade 3 immune-related adverse event, including choreoretinitis (n = 1), pneumonitis (n = 1), transaminitis (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 1). The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months, and the median overall survival was 6.9 months (range, 0.4-not reached). There was no clear association between peripheral blood T cell repertoire characteristics at baseline, PD-L1, or tumor mutations and response or outcome. One long-term survivor exhibited oligoclonal T cell populations in a baseline tumor biopsy that were consistently detected in peripheral blood over the entire course of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

HIGRT plus atezolizumab resulted in an overall response rate of 25% and disease control rate of 50% in this pilot study. The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was similar to that of atezolizumab alone. Alhough it was a pilot study with limited sample size, the results generated hypotheses worthy of further investigation.

Abstract 1332: High Throughput isolation and expansion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for personalized treatments

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have emerged as important blood-based surrogate markers of primary tumors. Current methods for isolation of lung CTCs mostly rely on biomarker dependent antibody-based capture, missing populations that may be stem-like in nature. Results: We have applied the microfluidic Labyrinth device for high throughput, label-free, size-based isolation of CTCs from non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC). The Labyrinth device was optimized and tested for inertial separation of cancer cells using the human lung cancer cell line H1650. The recovery and purity were &gt;82% and &gt;78%, respectively, operating at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/min. Using the biomarker-independent Labyrinth separation device, heterogeneous CTC populations were isolated from metastatic NSCLC patients (n=21). Heterogeneous CTC populations were detected, including CTCs (PanCK+ and CD45-), CTCs expressing EpCAM or Vimentin, and CTCs expressing both markers representing an EMT-like population of CTCs. Using Labyrinth, we were able to isolate CTCs from 100% of patients with an average yield of 180±168 CTCs/mL. Among the captured CTCs, EpCAM- CTCs were significantly more common than EpCAM+ CTCs (115.7 vs. 39.1 CTCs/mL respectively). Cell clusters of 2 or more CTCs were also observed in 95% of patients; 79% of these clusters were negative for EpCAM expression, whereas 35% expressed Vimentin, suggestive of an EMT phenotype. Recovered CTCs from patients with RET, ROS1 and ALK rearranged tumors showed aberrations matching with the primary tumor for each gene using FISH analysis. We have successfully expanded the recovered CTCs from 2 patients and screened for therapeutic targeting. We have found that TPX-0005 might be effective in these patients and would direct them to a clinical trial using this compound. Conclusion: The label-free Labyrinth device demonstrated the capability of collecting recovered CTCs from the device using a continuous processing technique while in a suspension state. This advantage opens the opportunities not only for CTC expansion off-chip, but also for ex-vivo drug testing to direct patient-specific therapies.

Citation Format: Mina Zeinali, Maggie Lee, Arthi Nadhan, Anvya Mathur, Wei Huang, Eric Lin, Ramdane Harouaka, Max S. Wicha, Nallasivam Palanisamy, Mathias Hafner, Rishindra Reddy, Gregory P. Kalemkerian, Bryan J. Schneider, Khaled A. Hassan, Nithya Ramnath, Sunitha Nagrath. High Throughput isolation and expansion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for personalized treatments [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1332.

Immune related adverse events in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint therapy who received the influenza vaccination versus no vaccination

e20657

Background: Influenza vaccination is recommended by the CDC for cancer patients to reduce the risk of influenza-related complications. There is concern that the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may be greater in vaccinated patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI). We sought to interrogate if influenza vaccination in patients with NSCLC receiving ICPI therapy had an increased incidence of irAEs compared to non-vaccinated patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy between 3/2015 – 12/2018. Influenza immunization records from both institutional and state-wide registries were obtained from 2014 -2019. Comparisons of adverse event incidence between flu vaccinated and control patients were tested using chi-square statistics. Results: 117 patients were included in our analysis, 33 (28%) were vaccinated during ICPI therapy, 19 (58%) received quadrivalent influenza vaccine, 13 (39%) received trivalent influenza vaccine and 1 (3%) was undetermined. 22 (67%) vaccinated patients had an irAE vs 53 (63%) patients who were not vaccinated during ICPI therapy (p = 0.720). 8 (24%) vaccinated patients had an irAE leading to discontinuation of therapy vs 12 (14%) patients who were not vaccinated during ICPI therapy (p = 0.198). The most frequent irAE in both groups was fatigue 16 (48%) vs 28 (33%) (p = 0.128). Notable irAEs included colitis (0 vs 1), pneumonitis (3 vs 3), hepatitis (1 vs 4) in vaccinated patients vs without vaccine, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline demographics between both groups including age, race, gender, tumor histology or ECOG performance status. Conclusions: Our study suggests that irAEs are not significantly increased with vaccination for influenza during ICPI therapy. However, there is a slight trend toward increased incidence of irAE warranting ICPI discontinuation for which further investigation is needed. Limitations of this study include a small sample size and inability to grade irAE retrospectively.

Safety and efficacy of durvalumab following multimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma: Results from Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium study

4058

Background: Concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) followed by esophagectomy is a standard of care for locally advanced esophageal (LA-EAC) and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Approximately 50% of patients (pts) experience disease relapse within the 1st yr after treatment(tx) completion. No adjuvant tx has been shown to improve survival in these pts. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity in metastatic PD-L1 positive EAC. Preclinical studies have shown upregulation of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway with RT +/- chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of durvalumab (durva), a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1, in pts with LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma who have viable tumor in surgical specimen after neoadjuvant CRT and R0 resection. Pts received durva 1500mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1yr. Results: 24 pts were enrolled from 4/2016-1/2018 (median age: 60yrs (range, 43-70). 18 received carbo/paclitaxel and 6 received cis/5-FU concurrently with radiation. Staging at diagnosis: T2N0 (n=3, 12.5%), T2N2 (n=3, 12.5%),T3N0 (n=6, 25%), T3N1 (n=6, 25%), T3N2 (n=4, 17%), T3N3 (n=1, 4%), T3Nx (n=1, 4%).19 pts (79%) had positive lymph nodes (LNs) at the time of surgery following CRT. 12 pts completed 1yr of tx, 12 came off tx before 1yr because of relapse(6), AEs(5), and consent withdrawal (1). Median number of tx cycles was 12.5 (range, 2-13). Most common AEs were fatigue (n=8, 33.3%) and nausea (n=6, 25%). 3pts (12.5%) developed grade 3 irAEs: pneumonitis (1), hepatitis (1), colitis (1). At median follow up of 14.5 mo (range, 1.7-24mo), 17 are disease free (including 5 who came off tx before 1yr). 7pts (29%) have relapsed (3 alive, 4 died). 6/7pts had distant relapse (lung, brain, bone, cervical LNs) and 1 had locoregional relapse. 1-yr RFS and OS were 79.2% and 95.5%, respectively. 2-yr OS was 59.2%. RFS probability at 26 mo was 67.9%. Median survival after relapse was 11.1 mo (range, 0.1-11.3mo). Conclusions: Adjuvant durvalumab following trimodality therapy for LA-EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma was safe and feasible with improvement in 1-yr RFS to 79.2% compared to historical rate of 50%. OS results are encouraging in this high risk pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT02639065.

A phase II trial of nintedanib in recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

e20061

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease that is resistant to chemotherapy and there remains an unmet need for better therapeutic options. Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) is an oral multikinase inhibitor impacting VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, and other kinase activity such as TGFß signaling pathways. VEGF, FGF, and TGFβ are commonly expressed in MPM. We conducted a phase II trial in patients with recurrent MPM after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: Patients (pts) with MPM previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, performance status (PS) 0-1, adequate organ function, and no contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy were eligible for treatment. Nintedanib 200 mg twice per day was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS). A two-stage design was used and > 4 pts had to have a PFS of ≥4 months to proceed to the second stage. Results: Twenty pts. were enrolled. The median age was 70 yrs. (32-81), 90% were male, and 80% were PS = 1. The histology was 70% epithelioidal, 5% sarcomatoid, 10% biphasic, and 15% unknown. 15% had prior bevacizumab. The median follow-up is 16.4 mo. A median of 2 treatment cycles (range 1-18) were delivered. There were no responses but 40% had stable disease. The median PFS was 1.8 mo. (95% CI: 1.68, 3.55) and the PFS rate at 4 mo. was 13%. The median OS was 4.2 mo. (95% CI: 2.53, 8.74) and the OS rate at 4 mo. was 55%. Toxicities were usually grade 1-2 and included diarrhea, fatigue, edema, transaminase elevation, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and dyspnea. Conclusions: The activity of nintedanib in previously treated MPM pts. was modest. The trial did not meet the primary PFS endpoint. However, there was a small subset of pts. that had prolonged stable disease for > 4 months thus potentially deriving some clinical benefit from treatment. Supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Clinical trial information: NCT02568449.

Chemotherapy and Radiation Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Elderly Patients With N3 Stage IIIB NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (chemo-RT). However, N3 stage IIIB disease portends a worse prognosis and the tolerability of chemo-RT in patients ≥70 years old is a concern. In this analysis, we evaluate the survival of patients with N3 stage IIIB NSCLC who were treated with chemo-RT or chemotherapy alone with a focus on elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with N3 stage IIIB NSCLC between 2010 and 2013 using the National Cancer Database. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who underwent chemo-RT versus chemotherapy alone. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for median OS with log rank tests. Multivariable Cox models were used for multivariable and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

We included 9769 patients in our analysis, 7770 of whom received chemo-RT and 1999 who received chemotherapy alone. The median OS for patients who received chemo-RT was 16.4 months versus 12.7 months with chemotherapy alone (P < .0001). The median OS for patients ≥70 years old who received chemo-RT was 15.0 months versus 12.4 months with chemotherapy alone (P < .0001). In multivariable analyses, the benefit of chemo-RT was similar regardless of age. Subgroup analyses in patients ≥70 years indicated a benefit of chemo-RT (hazard ratio, <1.0) across all patient and disease strata.

CONCLUSION

Survival was improved in elderly patients who received chemo-RT versus chemotherapy alone for N3 stage IIIB NSCLC. Our findings suggest that age and comorbidities should not preclude clinicians from recommending chemo-RT to these patients.

Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The aim of the NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities is to provide guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events resulting from cancer immunotherapy. The NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions and ASCO, consisting of medical and hematologic oncologists with expertise in a wide array of disease sites, and experts from the fields of dermatology, gastroenterology, neuro-oncology, nephrology, emergency medicine, cardiology, oncology nursing, and patient advocacy. Several panel representatives are members of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC). The initial version of the NCCN Guidelines was designed in general alignment with recommendations published by ASCO and SITC. The content featured in this issue is an excerpt of the recommendations for managing toxicity related to immune checkpoint blockade and a review of existing evidence. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines, including recommendations for managing toxicities related to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, visitNCCN.org.

Safety and efficacy of durvalumab following trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma: Early efficacy results from Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium study

5

Background: The standard of care for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma(LA-EAC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) followed by esophagectomy. Approximately 30% of patients (pts) achieve complete pathologic response (pCR) with this approach. The risk of relapse in the remaining 70% of pts is high, with 1-yr relapse free survival (RFS) of 50%. No adjuvant therapies have been shown to improve survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity in metastatic PD-L1 positive EAC. Preclinical studies have shown upregulation of PD-1 pathway with radiation +/- chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of durvalumab (durva), a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1, in pts with LA-EAC and GE junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma who do not achieve pCR after neoadjuvant CRT and R0 resection. Pts received durva 1500mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1 yr after surgery. Primary objective was 1-yr RFS. Secondary objectives were incidence and severity of treatment related adverse events (AEs). Results: Twenty-four pts were enrolled from Apr 2016 to Jan 2018 (median age: 60yrs (range, 43-74)). Fourteen pts had GEJ adenocarcinoma and 10 had distal EAC. Eighteen received carboplatin/paclitaxel and six received cisplatin/5-FU concurrently with 50-50.4Gy radiation. Nineteen pts (79%) had positive lymph nodes at the time of surgery after neoadjuvant CRT, including three (12.5%) with N3, nine (37.5%) with N2, and seven (29%) with N1 disease. Among N0 pts, two had T3N0, one had T2N0, and two had T1N0 disease. At median follow-up of 11.7 mo (range 1.7-23.9 mo), seven pts (29%) have relapsed (five alive, two died); 17(67%) are disease free (six on treatment, seven completed treatment, three off-treatment); 1-yr and projected 26 mo RFS are 78.6% and 62.9%, respectively. Five pts (20.8%) developed grade 3 AEs: diarrhea (n = 1), hepatitis (n = 1), encephalopathy (n = 1), hyperglycemia (n = 1), hypoglycemia (n = 1). Most common grade 1 and 2 AEs were fatigue (33.3%), nausea (25.0%), and cough (20.8%). Conclusions: Adjuvant durva in pts with residual disease following trimodality therapy for EAC and GEJ adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible with 1-yr RFS of 78.6% compared to historical rate of 50%. Clinical trial information: NCT02639065.

Use of Bone-Modifying Agents in Myeloma and Bone Metastases: How Recent Dosing Interval Studies Have Affected Our Practice

The management of bone lesions from advanced solid tumors and multiple myeloma typically includes use of a bone-modifying agent to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events. Recent data demonstrate that when using zoledronic acid to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events in metastatic breast cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma, the dosing interval of zoledronic acid may be extended from every 4 weeks to every 12 weeks. The ASCO guidelines on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer and multiple myeloma address zoledronic acid dosing intervals. Herein, we discuss how new data on dosing of bone-modifying agents influence our clinical practice.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. Methods A multidisciplinary, multi-organizational panel of experts in medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialist, and advocacy was convened to develop the clinical practice guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic review of the literature and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case series published from 2000 through 2017. Results The systematic review identified 204 eligible publications. Much of the evidence consisted of systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guidelines, case series, and case reports. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence on management of immune-related adverse events, recommendations are based on expert consensus. Recommendations Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, with the exception of some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert to grade 1 or less. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d or methylprednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d). Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4 to 6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require infliximab or other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, with the exception of endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy. Methods A multidisciplinary, multi-organizational panel of experts in medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialist, and advocacy was convened to develop the clinical practice guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic review of the literature and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case series published from 2000 through 2017. Results The systematic review identified 204 eligible publications. Much of the evidence consisted of systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guidelines, case series, and case reports. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence on management of immune-related adverse events, recommendations are based on expert consensus. Recommendations Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, with the exception of some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert to grade 1 or less. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d or methylprednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/d). Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4 to 6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require infliximab or other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, with the exception of endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .